Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis with Everolimus and Tacrolimus in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Receiving Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (PBSCT).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2886-2886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Caroline Pabst ◽  
Alexander Kiani ◽  
Johannes Schetelig ◽  
Martin Wermke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract Introduction: The use of a calcineurin-inhibitor in combination with methotrexate is the current standard in the prophylaxis of graft versus host disease (GVHD). Everolimus is a newly developed m-TOR inhibitor, which, besides a potent immunosuppressive action including the stimulation of regulatory CD4+foxp3+ T-cells (Tregs), seems to mediate anti-neoplastic effects in MDS and AML. Methods: We report results of a prospective study investigating for the first time a combination of everolimus (days 0–56) with tacrolimus (starting day 0) in 16 patients with MDS (RCMD n=3, RAEB-1 n=3, RAEB-2 n=3, CMMOL-1 n=1, CMMOL-2 n=1, MDS/AML n=1) or de novo AML (n=4) undergoing allogeneic myeloablative conditioning (busulfan 16 mg/kg over 4 days, fludarabine 120 mg/m² over 4 days) followed by a median of 7.0 x 106/kg CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from related (n=2) or unrelated donors (n=14). It is of note that 5 unrelated donor/recipient pairs displayed one allel-mismatch whereas all others were matched in 10 out 10 HLA characters. The median age of the patients was 61 years (range 47–69) and the majority (n=7) of MDS patients were classified INT-2 or HIGH according to IPSS. Results: All patients engrafted a median of 14 days (platelets) and 17 days (neutrophils) after transplant. On day 21 and 56 after PBSCT the median number of CD4+foxp3+ cells in the blood was not significantly different from normal donors (patients, n=5: 3.2 and 2.3 x 104/ul, controls n=4: 3.7 x 104/ul) Nevertheless, the rate of acute GVHD was moderate with five patients (31 %) developing acute GVHD grade II and only one patient experiencing grade IV GVHD after cessation of immunosuppression due to thrombotic-thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Decrease of thrombocytes together clinical signs of TTP were seen in two additional patients while four patients developed VOD of the liver, which was fatal in one case. Extensive chronic GVHD was seen in 50 % of evaluable patients. Mucositis CTC grade III was observed in 5 patients only. The total day 100 mortality rate was 19 % and currently eleven out of sixteen patients (69%) are alive and in remission. Conclusion: Everolimus and tacrolimus are highly efficient in preventing GVHD after unrelated PBSCT in older patients with MDS and AML, which seems not to be mediated by an increase in Tregs. Nevertheless, side effects associated with thrombotic microangiopathy might be more prevalent compared to other regimens.

Use of Peripheral Blood Grafts Is Associated with Increased Acute and Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease without Improved Survival after Unrelated Donor Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 443-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Eapen ◽  
Michael Haagenson ◽  
Brent Logan ◽  
Dennis Confer ◽  
Mary Horowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Single Locus ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract Data from the CIBMTR indicate that approximately 70% of unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCT) in the U.S. utilize peripheral blood (PB) rather than bone marrow (BM) as a graft source. Comparative studies verifying its benefit, however, are lacking. We, therefore, performed a retrospective analysis comparing the results of 275 unrelated PB and 620 unrelated BM transplants in adults 18–60 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), transplanted in 2000–2002. 73% of PB grafts were matched at HLA A, B, C (low resolution) and DRB1, 21% were mismatched at a single locus and 6% were mismatched at ≥ 2 loci. 69% of BM grafts were matched, 26% were mismatched at a single locus and 5% were mismatched at ≥ 2 loci. Median follow-up was 24 (range, 6–48) and 34 (range, 6–54) months for PB and BM recipients, respectively. Groups were similar except PB recipients were less likely to have CML, were more likely to have MDS and were transplanted more recently. Incidences of neutrophil recovery (95% vs. 90% at day 100, p=0.01) and platelets ≥20,000/ul (81% vs. 66%, at 1-year, p <0.0001) were significantly higher after PB than BM transplants. Incidences of grades 2–4 but not grades 3–4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were significantly higher after PB than BM transplants (56% vs.45%, at day 100, p=0.003). Chronic GVHD was also significantly higher after PB transplants (54% vs. 39%, at 3 years, p<0.0001). Despite higher rates of grade 2–4 acute and chronic GVHD after PB transplantation, incidence of relapse was similar in the two groups for both early and advanced leukemia. In multivariate analysis, risks of treatment-related mortality (TRM), treatment failure (relapse or death) and overall mortality during the first 9 months after transplantation were similar. However, among patients surviving the first 9 months, subsequent risks of TRM (relative risk [RR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–3.17, p=0.01) and treatment failure (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.06–2.44, p=0.03) were significantly higher in the PB cohort. Three-year adjusted (from multivariate models) probabilities of leukemia-free survival were 29% and 31%, p=0.5, after PB and BM transplantation, respectively; corresponding probabilities of overall survival were 31% and 32%, p=0.8. While these data do not indicate a survival advantage with either stem cell source by disease or risk group, PB is associated with earlier engraftment. This advantage is offset by higher rates of grades 2–4 acute and chronic GVHD, leading to a higher risk of late adverse events. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to better define the relative risks and benefits of PB in the setting of unrelated donor HCT.

Does Donor Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Seropositivity Affect Recipient's Risk of Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-HSCT)?

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5766-5766
Author(s):  
Erden Atilla ◽  
Esmanur Kaplan ◽  
Pinar Ataca Atilla ◽  
Selami Kocak Toprak ◽  
Pervin Topcuoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract Introduction: EBV seropositivity in general population is 80%. Reactivation of latent infection in pre-transplant seropositive patients causes post-transplant lenfoproliferative disease (PTLD) following Allo-HSCT. The effect of donor EBV positivity on recipient's risk of graft versus host disease is not clear. Our aim is to present EBV seroprevalence and PTLD incidence as well as demonstrating the relation of EBV seropositivity with GVHD. Patients and Methods: A total of 364 allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients and donors were evaluated retrospectively from 2006 to 2015. During Allo-HSCT preparation procedures all recipients and donors were serologically tested. EBV specific IgG (VCA-IgG, EBNAIgG, EA-IgG) and IgM (VCA-IgM) antibodies were determined by Chemiluminescence by ARCHITECT lab analyzers using commercially available kits (Abbott, USA). All patients were followed for reactivation. Results: EBV IgG positivity was detected in 338 of recipients (92.8%) and 283 of donors (77.7%). There was no statistically difference detected between related or unrelated transplants. The mean age was 37 (range 16-67). 217 recipients were male (60%). 295 (81%) patients were transplanted for malign hematological diseases. The majority of patients were grafted from full-matched related donors (258, 71%). The most common source of stem cell was peripheral blood in 299 patients (82%) followed by bone-marrow in 56 patients (15%), bone-marrow plus peripheral blood in 9 patients (3%). 273 (75%) patients received myeloablative conditioning regimen. All patients received prophylactic acyclovir (in related transplants 400mg 3 times daily, in un-related transplants 800mg 3 times daily) starting from conditioning and up to three months posttranplant period. One pretransplant seropositive 26 year-old aplastic anemia patient had PTLD with EBV IgM positivity within 3 months posttransplant. He received 4 cycles of rituximab and prednisolone and achieved complete response. Three patients had EBV IgM positivity in posttransplant 4, 9 and 24th months with symptoms of infectious mononucleosis. The seropositivity resolved without treatment. Acute GVHD developed in 223 patients (61%) whereas chronic GVHD was detected in 285 (78%) of patients. The incidence of acute GVHD was similar when donor was EBV seropositive compared to seronegative (78% vs 22%, p=0.72). Chronic GVHD incidence was similar between donor EBV seropositive group compared to seronegative group (80% vs 20%, P=0.199). Conclusion: EBV seropositivity is common detected in 92.8% of our allo-HSCT recipient cohort. Donor EBV status did not have an effect on developing acute or chronic GVHD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Cyclosporine or Cyclosporine Plus Methylprednisolone for Prophylaxis of Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 3880-3887 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
Danyu Lin ◽  
Wendy Leisenring ◽  
Michael Boeckh ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
To Receive

Patients with a lymphohematopoietic malignancy considered to be at high risk for posttransplant relapse were enrolled in a study to compare the use of cyclosporine (CSP) as a single agent with a combination of methylprednisolone (MP) and CSP for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Sixty patients were randomized to receive CSP only and 62 were randomized to receive CSP plus MP. Daily CSP was started on day −1 (5 mg/kg/d intravenously) and administered at gradually reduced doses until day 180. MP was started on day 7 at 0.5 mg/kg/d, increased to 1.0 mg/kg/d on day 15, started on a taper schedule on day 29, and discontinued on day 72. All 104 evaluable patients (surviving ≥28 days) had sustained engraftment. The incidence rates of grades II-IV acute GVHD were 73% and 60% for patients receiving CSP and CSP plus MP, respectively (P = .01). No difference was seen for grades III-IV GVHD. However, chronic GVHD occurred somewhat more frequently in patients receiving CSP plus MP (44%) than in patients receiving only CSP (21%; P = .02). The incidence of de novo chronic GVHD was marginally higher in patients receiving CSP plus MP (P = .08). No significant differences in the risk of infections were observed. There was a suggestion that the risk of relapse was lower in patients receiving CSP plus MP (P = .10) and, although the overall survival in the two groups was not different (P = .44), there was a slight advantage in favor of CSP plus MP-treated patients for relapse-free survival (P = .07). These results suggest that prophylactic MP, when combined with CSP, has only limited efficacy in acute GVHD prevention and may increase the probability of chronic GVHD.

Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. A Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium Study..

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4984-4984
Author(s):  
Mark P. Atlas ◽  
Greg Yanik ◽  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
Rakesh K. Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Matched Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Incidence of acute GVHD is a major risk factor for chronic GVHD. Calcineurin inhibitors form the backbone of graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. When comparing cyclosporine to tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis, we previously reported a trend toward superiority of cyclosporine as prophylaxis against acute GVHD. We now analyze their effect on the incidence and severity of chronic GVHD. In a multi-institutional trial, we prospectively collected the clinical data on 141 evaluable patients receiving either cyclosporine/methotrexate or tacrolimus/methotrexate based prophylactic regimens for 6/6 matched unrelated donor, transplant. Conditioning regimens were fully ablative; no T-cell depletion was permitted; cord blood donors were excluded. Patients were required to receive either cyclosporine or tacrolimus, but the choice was per investigator preference. The two arms were reasonably balanced: 60.1% of patients received cyclosporine and 39.9% of patients received tacrolimus. Rates for acute GVHD were 60.4% for cyclosporine and 73.8% for tacrolimus (p = 0.086). Rates for chronic GVHD were 44.2% for cyclosporine and 47.3% for tacrolimus (p = 0.7). In the 61 patients with chronic GVHD, extensive disease was present in 82.9% of cyclosporine group and 80.8% of the tacrolimus group (p = 1.0) Those graded as moderate or severe comprised 80% of the cyclosporine group and 56% of the tacrolimus group (p = 0.46) and those both extensive and moderate or severe were 71.4% and 52%, respectively (p = 0.12). In pediatric matched unrelated donor transplantation, the incidence and severity of chronic graft versus host disease in patients receiving either tacrolimus/methotrexate or cyclosporine/methotrexate based regimens for prophylaxis of GVHD are not significantly different.

scholarly journals Cyclosporine or Cyclosporine Plus Methylprednisolone for Prophylaxis of Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 3880-3887 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
Danyu Lin ◽  
Wendy Leisenring ◽  
Michael Boeckh ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Patients with a lymphohematopoietic malignancy considered to be at high risk for posttransplant relapse were enrolled in a study to compare the use of cyclosporine (CSP) as a single agent with a combination of methylprednisolone (MP) and CSP for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Sixty patients were randomized to receive CSP only and 62 were randomized to receive CSP plus MP. Daily CSP was started on day −1 (5 mg/kg/d intravenously) and administered at gradually reduced doses until day 180. MP was started on day 7 at 0.5 mg/kg/d, increased to 1.0 mg/kg/d on day 15, started on a taper schedule on day 29, and discontinued on day 72. All 104 evaluable patients (surviving ≥28 days) had sustained engraftment. The incidence rates of grades II-IV acute GVHD were 73% and 60% for patients receiving CSP and CSP plus MP, respectively (P = .01). No difference was seen for grades III-IV GVHD. However, chronic GVHD occurred somewhat more frequently in patients receiving CSP plus MP (44%) than in patients receiving only CSP (21%; P = .02). The incidence of de novo chronic GVHD was marginally higher in patients receiving CSP plus MP (P = .08). No significant differences in the risk of infections were observed. There was a suggestion that the risk of relapse was lower in patients receiving CSP plus MP (P = .10) and, although the overall survival in the two groups was not different (P = .44), there was a slight advantage in favor of CSP plus MP-treated patients for relapse-free survival (P = .07). These results suggest that prophylactic MP, when combined with CSP, has only limited efficacy in acute GVHD prevention and may increase the probability of chronic GVHD.

T Regulatory Cells in Graft-Versus-Host Disease of the Skin

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4354-4354
Author(s):  
Jose Azar ◽  
Steven Billings ◽  
Jennifer E. Schwartz ◽  
Yunlong Liu ◽  
Menggang Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Treg Cells ◽  
P Value ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract FoxP3+ CD25+ T regulatory (Treg) cells are known to be present in normal skin. Treg cell functional deficiency resulting in loss of suppression of activation, differentiation or expansion of effector T cells could conceivably contribute to the pathophysiology of graft-versus- host disease (GVHD). Rezvani et al. suggest that levels of peripheral blood Treg cells in donors and recipients may predict the risk of acute GVHD. Rieger et al. found a significantly lower number of Treg cells in human colonic biopsies with GVHD versus CMV colitis or normal samples. There are no reports that evaluate tissue Treg cells in human skin affected by GVHD. This study was conducted to evaluate the distribution of Treg cells in skin affected by acute GVHD versus chronic GVHD. Archived samples from patients previously reported by routine histopathological methods as acute or chronic GVHD were collected, coded and entered into a database. For immunostaining, 4-μm thick serial sections were cut and deparaffinized. Immunohistochemical stains for CD4 (Neomarkers, 1:20), CD8 (Dako, prediluted), CD25 (Dako, 1:100), and Foxp3 (Serotec, 1:250) were performed using standard techniques. The dermatopathologist evaluating the samples was blinded to the clinical outcomes. Results were scored as 0 (&lt;10% of lymphocytes positive), 1+ (10–25% positive), 2+ (26–50% positive), and 3+ (≥50% positive). Fourteen patients with acute skin GVHD and seventeen with chronic GVHD were identified from a database of patients who had undergone nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood transplantation in the recent past. The average scores for each immunostain were calculated and are summarized in table 1. The average FoxP3 score in acute GVHD specimens was significantly lower than that in chronic GVHD specimens (average, 0.57 versus 1.41; p-value = 0.011). The average scores of CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD25 immunostains were not significantly different between acute and chronic GVHD biopsies. These findings represent the initial observation of a distinction between the distribution of regulatory T cells in acute and chronic GVHD of the skin. These observations should be confirmed in a larger sample, supported by functional assays of Treg cells, and correlated with clinical outcomes. Such studies may help to elucidate the role of Treg cells in acute and chronic skin GVHD. Table 1. Average score CD 3 CD 4 CD 8 CD 25 Fox P3 Acute GVHD 2.93 2.21 2.14 0.29 0.57 Chronic GVHD 2.82 2.44 2.24 0.71 1.41 p-value 1.00 0.42 0.43 0.34 0.011

Tregs In Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Task Force In Trouble?.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3748-3748
Author(s):  
Sya N. Ukena ◽  
Jens Grosse ◽  
Stefanie Buchholz ◽  
Michael Stadler ◽  
Arnold Ganser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Peripheral Tolerance ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 3748 Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains the major clinical complication in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) resulting in severe morbidity and significant mortality. This alloreactive immune response is mainly induced by donor T cells transplanted with the graft. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an essential role in the induction and maintenance of peripheral tolerance. In addition, data from murine models have shown that Tregs can prevent GvHD while preserving the graft-versus-leukemia effect. In order to functionally and dynamically characterize human Tregs after allogeneic SCT, we analyzed CD4+CD25highCD127dim T cells isolated from the peripheral blood of more than 80 patients with hematological malignancies every 30 days over half a year following SCT. Patients were divided into the following clinical groups: (A) no signs of acute or chronic GvHD, (B) acute GvHD, (C) chronic GvHD and (D) acute GvHD passed into chronic GvHD. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were separated by Ficoll gradient and CD4+CD14−CD25highCD127dim T cells were isolated by MoFlow cell sorting. Isolated RNA was pooled and microarray analysis was performed by using Affymetrix HG_U133_Plus2.0 Arrays. Results were verified by using quantitative realtime RT-PCR. Additionally, Tregs were phenotypically analyzed by FACS. We monitored a continous but slower recovery of Tregs in GvHD within the first 6 months following PBSCT. Manifestation of acute and chronic GvHD correlated with significantly reduced frequencies of peripheral Tregs in the first month after PBSCT compared to patients without GvHD. Microarray data revealed a high stability of the Treg transcriptome in the first half year representing the most sensitive time window for tolerance induction. Moreover, comparison of the Treg gene expression profiles from patients with and without GvHD point to a reduced suppressive function of Tregs with diminished migration capacity to the target organs likely contributing to the development of GvHD. Our findings corroborate the impact of human Tregs in the pathophysiology of GvHD and identify novel targets for the manipulation of Tregs to optimize strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of life-threatening GvHD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Increased risk of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using unrelated donors

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 548-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Remberger ◽  
Dietrich W. Beelen ◽  
Axel Fauser ◽  
Nadezda Basara ◽  
Oliver Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Unrelated Donors

AbstractThe long-term follow-up of a study including 214 patients receiving either peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) from an HLA-A, -B, and -DR–compatible unrelated donor is presented. Median follow-up was 4.4 (2.3-7.3) and 5.0 (0.7-8.4) years in the 2 groups, respectively. Cumulative incidence of overall chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was similar in the 2 groups (78% vs 71%), while extensive chronic GVHD was significantly more common in the PBSC group compared with the BM group (39% vs 24%, P = .03). The 5-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 37% in the PBSC group and 35% in the BM controls (P = .7), and overall survival was 42% in both groups. The relapse incidences were 26% and 27% in the 2 groups, respectively, resulting in a disease-free survival of 41% in both groups. In conclusion, PBSCs from HLA-compatible unrelated donors results in similar outcome compared to BM but implies an increased risk for extensive chronic GVHD.

scholarly journals Abatacept Is Effective for Gvhd Prophylaxis after Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation (URD SCT) for Severe Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 370-370
Author(s):  
Alexander I. Ngwube ◽  
Niketa C. Shah ◽  
David Jacobsohn ◽  
Edward Dela Ziga ◽  
Shalini Shenoy
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
One Year

Background In 2016, results from the first URD SCT for SCD (the SCURT Trial) revealed a 2-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of 79% (95% CI 59-90) and 69% (95% CI, 48-82) respectively following reduced intensity conditioning (RIC).1 Though the RIC approach provided successful engraftment in the majority, the transplant approach was not considered safe for widespread adoption due to high rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) especially in children &gt;13 years, a predominant cause of mortality. Strategies to minimize GVHD were essential if URD SCT was to be considered with curative intent in SCD. Aim/Method Multicenter trial (NCT03128996) with the primary objective of determining EFS in non-malignant disorders at one-year was amended as follows. The phase I SCD cohort included conditioning with hydroxyurea, proximal alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan in patients with 8/8 HLA-matched URD (-A, -B, - C and -DRB1).1 Thiotepa (8 mg/kg) was added in 7/8 HLA-mismatched SCT. GVHD prophylaxis included a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate as previously described. Abatacept (10 mg/kg) was administered on days -1, +5, +14, +28, +60, +100, +180, +270 and +365 based on efficacy described against acute GVHD with early dosing after SCT for malignant disorders.2,3 The latter 3 doses were omitted in cord transplant recipients. Result Thirteen children (7-21 years) underwent SCT (8/8 URD marrow- 7; 7/8 URD marrow or cord-6) primarily for stroke (N=6), ≥3 severe vaso-occlusive pain crises (N=4) or ≥2 acute chest syndrome episodes per year (N=3). The conditioning regimen was well tolerated. One patient had primary graft rejection after CMV infection (7%) and had autologous recovery. All other patients engrafted; neutrophils at median of 18 days (10-24), platelets at median of 28 days (16-39) and are surviving free of SCD with median follow-up of 12 months (range 4-59). Myeloid lineage donor chimerism was &gt;95% and lymphoid was 39%- 100% at day+100. Two-year OS and EFS was 100% and 92.3% (95% CI, 6.57-35.7), respectively. The day+100 incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD incidence was 23% and 15% respectively. One-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 38%. However, only one patient (7%) developed extensive cGVHD. One patient (7%) developed posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and recovered. Viral replication in blood was detected in 7 of 13 patients (7 CMV, 1 EBV reactivation). No patient developed EBV PTLD or required EBV-related intervention. Conclusion In comparison to previous experience1 with RIC and URD SCT, our early observations are (1) a lower incidence of PRES (7 vs 34%) (2) low incidence of severe acute GVHD (15% vs 17% grade III -IV) despite mismatched donors, (3) low incidence of extensive chronic GVHD (7% vs 38%) and (4) no mortality despite patient age (10/13 were &gt;13 years old). We attribute this gain to avoiding steroid use, and the benefit of including abatacept into the treatment regimen. The engraftment, safety, and immune reconstitution profile continue to be monitored in this ongoing trial now accruing in a Phase II cohort. As we and others work toward expanding donor options for SCD transplants, we submit that all alternate donor transplants for severe SCD are experimental and should be performed on clinical trials that track success and pitfalls. Reference: 1. Shenoy S et al. A trial of unrelated donor marrow transplantation for children with severe sickle cell disease. Blood. 2016 Nov 24; 128(21): 2561-2567. 2. Koura et al. In vivo T cell costimulation blockade with abataceptfor acute graft-versus-host disease prevention: a first-in-disease trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Nov; 19(11): 1638-49. 3. Watkins BK et al. T cell co-stimulation blockade with CTLA-4 Ig (Abatacept) for acute GVHD prevention in HLA-matched and mismatched unrelated donor transplantation: Results of a Phase 2 trial. Abstract 65. ASTCT Meetings, Houston 2019. Figure Disclosures Shah: Jazz pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Abatacept, FDA approved for rheumatoid arthritis is a fusion protein that inhibits T-cell activation by binding to CD80/CD86 on antigen-presenting cells (APCs).It is used for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prevention during unrelated-donor hematopoietic cell transplantation in this study

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document