Myelodysplasia after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5329-5329
Author(s):  
Gregory Franz ◽  
Brian McClune ◽  
Francis Buadi ◽  
William Walsh ◽  
Frank White ◽  
...  

Abstract Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) increases the overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), and it has become standard of care in this setting. Long-term survivors of ASCT transplanted for lymphoma or Hodgkin’s disease are known to have a high risk of developing myelodysplasia (MDS), but the risk of MDS is not clear for patients transplanted for MM. From 1996 through 2005, 82 patients underwent ASCT for MM at our center, survived at least 6 months and have adequate documentation of follow-up for review. The group included 47 males and 35 females of median age 56 years (range, 37–74 yrs). Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 8.2 mos (range, 2.6–86.1 mos). Prior to coming to transplantation, 28% had received melphalan (MEL), 98% received some form of chemotherapy, and 34% received radiation. This prior therapy included 1 or 2 regimens for 48% of the patients, and more than 2 regimens for 52% of patients. Mobilization was effected using CYC plus growth factor for 79% of the patients, CAD or VAD plus growth factor for 17%, and growth factor alone for 4%. The median mobilization rate was 28.7 × 106 CD34/L blood processed (range, 2.0–250.1 × 106 CD34/L blood processed). A single ASCT was provided for 68%, and 32% underwent ASCT more than once. High-dose MEL alone was used as the preparative regimen for 83%, and the remainder received at least one ASCT with a more intensive preparative regimen. The median CD34 dose for the first ASCT was 5.1 × 106/kg (range, 0.4–113.0 × 106/kg). Nine patients developed MDS. The 5-yr actuarial risk was 26% (95% CI, 8–43%). On multivariate analysis, there was a trend for an increased risk of developing MDS with a CD34 cell dose <3 × 106/kg (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.0–16.2, p=0.059), but there were otherwise no significant prognostic factors. Eight of the 9 patients with MDS had a PR or better as the best response to ASCT for MM. Five of the MDS patients had relapse of MM as well. Median survival after the diagnosis of MDS was 18.1 mos. Five patients with MDS have died, two from recurrent myeloma, two from AML, and one from sepsis and MDS. The median survival for all patients was 51.7 mos from ASCT and 69.1 mos from diagnosis, and there were no differences in survivals between those with or without MDS. We conclude that there is a relatively high risk of MDS after ASCT for MM, but development of MDS does not appear to worsen overall survival.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tianmei Zeng ◽  
Lili Zhou ◽  
Hao Xi ◽  
Weijun Fu ◽  
Juan Du ◽  
...  

Aim.To evaluate whether patients with multiple myeloma at various risks can still benefit the same from autologous stem cell transplantation consolidation in the era of novel agents. We retrospectively analyzed 67 consecutive myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation after bortezomib and/or thalidomide based inductions. Totally 17 high-risk, 24 intermediate-risk, and 26 low-risk patients were enrolled, based on fluorescence in situ hybridization and ISS stage. Meanwhile, another 67 risk-, response depth-, and age-matched patients not proceeding to autologous stem cell transplantation were chosen as controls. Our preliminary data indicated that, in the high-risk subgroup, progression-free survival and overall survival were both significantly prolonged after autologous stem cell transplantation (P<0.001andP=0.015) while, in the intermediate-risk subgroup, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival was prolonged significantly after autologous stem cell transplantation (P>0.05), and in the low-risk subgroup, only progression-free survival was extended significantly (P=0.012) after autologous stem cell transplantation. Multiple variables analysis further indicated that autologous stem cell transplantation and risk stratification were two independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Our results indicated that myeloma patients at different risks all benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation consolidation even in the era of novel agents.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (19) ◽  
pp. 1617-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam H. Ahmedzai ◽  
John A. Snowden ◽  
Andrew John Ashcroft ◽  
David Allan Cairns ◽  
Cathy Williams ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (sASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after a prior autologous stem-cell transplantation leads to increased remission duration and overall survival. We report a comprehensive study on patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life (QoL) and pain in sASCT. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to either sASCT or nontransplantation consolidation (NTC). Pain and QoL were assessed as secondary outcomes using validated QoL instruments (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and myeloma-specific module, QLQ-MY20; the Brief Pain Inventory [Short Form]; and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [Self-Assessment] scale). RESULTS A total of 288 patients (> 96%) consented to the QoL substudy. The median follow-up was 52 months. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 Global health status scores were higher (better) in the NTC group at 100 days after random assignment ( P = .0496), but not at later time points. Pain interference was higher (worse) in the sASCT group than in the NTC group at 6 months after random assignment ( P = .0267), with patients with sASCT reporting higher scores for Pain interference with daily living for up to 2 years after random assignment. Patients reporting lower concerns about adverse effects of treatment after sASCT had a time to progression advantage. CONCLUSION Patients with sASCT with relapsed MM demonstrated a comparative reduction in QoL and greater impact of treatment adverse effects lasting for 6 months and up to 2 years for pain, after which patients who had received sASCT reported better outcomes. Patients who experienced lower adverse effects after sASCT had longer time to progression and overall survival, showing the need to improve symptom management peritransplantation. To our knowledge, this study provides the most comprehensive picture of QoL before and after sASCT in patients with relapsed MM.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 3474-3480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Garban ◽  
Michel Attal ◽  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Jean H. Bourhis ◽  
...  

The Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) initiated 2 trials in 1999 to study patients with high-risk (β2-microglobulin level greater than 3 mg/L and chromosome 13 deletion at diagnosis) de novo multiple myeloma. In both protocols, the induction regimen consisted of vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by first autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prepared by melphalan 200 mg/m2. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor were subsequently treated with dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation (IFM99-03 trial), and patients without an HLA-identical sibling donor were randomly assigned to undergo second ASCT prepared by melphalan 220 mg/m2 and 160 mg dexamethasone with or without anti–IL-6 monoclonal antibody (IFM99-04 protocol). Two hundred eighty-four patients—65 in the IFM99-03 trial and 219 in the IFM99-04 trial—were prospectively treated and received at least one course of VAD. On an intent-to-treat basis, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly in the studies (medians 35 and 25 months in the IFM99-03 trial vs 41 and 30 months in the IFM99-04 trial, respectively). With a median follow-up time of 24 months, the EFS of the 166 patients randomly assigned in the tandem ASCT protocol was similar to the EFS of the 46 patients who underwent the entire IFM99-03 program (median, 35 vs 31.7 months), with a trend for a better OS in patients treated with tandem ASCT (median, 47.2 vs 35 months; P = .07). In patients with high-risk de novo MM, the combination of ASCT followed by dose-reduced allogeneic transplantation was not superior to tandem dose–intensified, melphalan-based ASCT.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4548-4548
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Marco Bua ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4548 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In the face of almost inevitable disease relapse, there is growing evidence for second ASCT as salvage therapy in certain patient groups. However, few published data exist regarding efficacy and safety of third ASCT in relapsed disease. We retrospectively analysed the results of eight patients treated at a single UK institution who each received three separate autologous stem cell transplants for relapsed MM between May 1997 and April 2012. There were four men and four women. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range, 25–64 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgA in two patients and IgG in the remaining six patients. At the time of 1st transplant, seven patients were in partial response (PR) and one in complete response (CR). Conditioning melphalan dose was 200mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 140mg/m2. Three patients entered CR following 1st transplant and four patients showed PR. Median time to disease progression was 31 months (range, 11.8–52.9 months). Prior to 2nd transplant, five patients achieved very good partial response (VGPR) and three PR with induction chemotherapy. Melphalan dose was 200mg/m2 in five patients and 140mg/m2 in the remaining three. Median time to disease progression was 22.3 months (range, 10.1– 39.6 months). At the time of 3rd transplant, two patients had achieved VGPR following induction chemotherapy, one showed PR, two stable disease (SD) and three evidence of disease progression. For the 3rd transplant, melphalan dose was reduced in most cases. Median follow up post 3rd transplant was 8.3 months (range 1.1–29.3 months). One patient died of overwhelming sepsis within one month of transplantation (treatment related mortality). At the time of analysis, five patients had relapsed following 3rd ASCT, with median time to disease progression of 10.4 months (range, 2.7–23.7 months). Three of these patients died at 3.5, 17.6 and 27.1 months post 3rd transplant. The remaining two patients are alive with no evidence of disease relapse (progression free survival (PFS) time of 3.3 and 1.3 months). Overall survival (OS) for the group from diagnosis is 62% at 10 years with a median OS from diagnosis of 149 months (range 68.5 – 189.2 months) (Figure 1). Median OS for the group from 3rd transplant is 17.6 months (range, 1.1–29.3 months) (Figure 2). Median PFS is 10.4 months (range 1.1–23.7 months). These results demonstrate that third ASCT is a possible treatment strategy for patients with relapsed MM and may prolong patient survival. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis for patients receiving 3rd autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis for patients receiving 3rd autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival from time of 3rd autologous stem cell transplant Figure 2:. Overall survival from time of 3rd autologous stem cell transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1485-1485
Author(s):  
Lia Angela Moulopoulos ◽  
Dimitra Gika ◽  
Kay Dellasale ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Athanasios Anagnostopoulos ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To determine the prognostic value of spinal bone MRI in symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma requiring treatment. Materials and methods: Between January 1990 and Decmber 2001, 142 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) underwent MRI of the spine before initiation of treatment. All patients received primary treatment based on high dose pulse dexamethasone (D) such as VAD or Melphalan + D. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation was administered to 61 patients. MRI patterns of involvement were correlated with known prognostic variables of myeloma (including the International Staging System (ISS)), with response to treatment and with survival. Results: Focal marrow lesions with intervening normal marrow were identified in 50% of patients, diffuse marrow replacement in 28%, a variegated pattern consisting of innumerable small foci of marrow replacement on a background of normal marrow in 14% and normal MRI pattern in 8% of patients. When patients with diffuse pattern were compared to patients with other MRI patterns, they had features of more advanced disease such as higher ISS, anemia, hypercalcemia, extensive bone marrow plasmacytosis, elevated serum LDH and impaired renal function. Patients and disease features were similar among patients with normal, focal or variegated MRI patterns. The frequency of response to primary treatment was similar among patients with different MRI patterns. Median survival was 24 months for patients with a diffuse pattern, 51 months for those with a focal pattern, 52 months for variegated and 56 months for patients with normal pattern (p=0.001). The presence or absence of diffuse MRI pattern separated the patients with ISS 1 and 2 into two subgroups with significantly different survival times of 28 months and 61 months respectively (p=0.01). Among patients with ISS 3, those with a diffuse pattern had a median survival of 18 months, whereas the remaining patients survived for a median of 30 months (p=0.5). Furthermore, a diffuse pattern predicted an inferior outcome both in patients who did or did not receive high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Conclusion: MRI of the spine before treatment provides prognostic information for symptomatic patients with myeloma, especially for those with ISS 1 or 2. Diffuse marrow replacement on MRI of the spine identifies patients with advanced MM who have a poor prognosis. Such patients are candidates for innovative treatments.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4884-4884
Author(s):  
Xiao Ying Qi ◽  
Qi Long Yi ◽  
Donna Reece ◽  
A. Keith Stewart ◽  
Hong Chang

Abstract We investigated the relevance of p53 deletions to the clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Hemizygous p53 gene deletions were detected by cytoplasmic Ig-enhanced interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (cIg-FISH) in 10 of 105 (9.5%) patients studied. p53 deletions were associated with higher serum calcium (p=0.0062) and creatinine (p=0.013) levels but there were no association with patient age, gender, β-2 microglobulin, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, albumin, bone lytic lesions, or immunoglobulin isotype. There were no association of p53 deletions with chromosome 13q deletions, translocation t(11;14) or t(4;14). The overall response rates were similar in patients with and without p53 deletions (67% vs 71%). However, patients with p53 deletions had significantly shorter progression free (median 7.9 vs. 25.7 months, p=0.0324) and overall survival (median 14.7 vs. 48.1 months, p=0.0008) than patients without a p53 deletion. A multivariate analysis confirmed p53 deletion was an independent prognostic factor predicting shortened progression free (p=0.0009) or overall survival (p=0.0002) in myeloma patients after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4502-4502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Necamp ◽  
Sulsal Haque ◽  
Saulius K Girnius

Abstract Introduction:The management of multiple myeloma has become increasingly complex, given late age of onset, underlying co-morbidities, plethora of drugs, and variable clinical presentation and natural history. Practice patterns likely vary based on practice type, physician experience, and geographic distributions. The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation's (MMRF) CoMMpass Trial (Relating Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile) is a prospective, longitudinal, observation trial in NDMM with the primary goal of correlating patient data and response with molecular profiles. Here, we evaluate practice patterns in NDMM the CoMMpass Trial based on staging, high-risk features, and demographics. Methods: Clinical data were derived from MMRF's CoMMpass IA8, accessed in late July 2016 on https://research.themmrf.org/rp/explore. Independent categorical variables analyzed include International Staging System (ISS), Revised-ISS (R-ISS), LDH (normal vs. above upper limit of normal), Fluorescence-In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) (standard vs. high risk (t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14:20), del17p)), race, performance status (PS) (0-1, 2, 3-4), age (>65, 65-75, 76-80, >80 years), and gender. Dependent variables include use of doublets vs. triplets, the use of triplets using combined immunomodulatory/proteosome inhibition (IMID/PI), receiving or not receiving an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and timing of transplant (<10 vs. >10 months). For high-risk MM, defined as ISS 3, R-ISS 3, elevated LDH, or high risk FISH, patients receiving doublet therapy without an autologous stem cell transplantation were further analyzed for performance status and age. Descriptive statistics were used. Chi-square testing was used to compare variables, using STATA v14.1. Results: Data on 921 patients has been released and was reviewed. Although men and women had similar upfront therapy, including the use of triplet (57% vs. 61%, p=0.483) and IMID/PI combinations (56% vs. 62%, p=0.181), women were more likely to have an ASCT (44% vs. 34%, p=0.002). When compared to European Americans (EA), African-Americans (AA) were less likely to receive triplets (47% vs. 61%, p=0.004), IMID/PI combination (55% vs. 59%, p=0.001), and ASCT (30% vs. 40%, p=0.034). Patients with high-risk disease were not more likely to be treated more aggressively. Patients with ISS Stage 3 disease were less likely to receive triplets (50% vs. 64%, p=0.002), IMID/PI combinations (51% vs. 66%, p=0.001), or an ASCT (26% vs. 48%, p=<10-3). When comparing standard-risk MM, as defined by LDH or FISH, high-risk patients were not more likely to receive triplet therapy or ASCT. Performance status did not correlate triplet use, but lower rates of IMID/PI combinations and ASCT were noted in those with worse PS. We subsequently reviewed patients with high-risk features who were treated with doublet therapy and without ASCT, specifically looking performance status and age. Of those with elevated LDH, 12 (46%) were younger than 65 years and 12 (46%) had PS<1. Of those with high risk FISH, 20 (49%) were younger than 65 years and 37 (76%) had PS<1. Of those with ISS 3, 24 (26%) were younger than 65 years and 49 (56%) had PS<1. Of those with R-ISS 3, 12 (44%) were younger than 65 years and 17 (63%) had PS<1. Conclusions: The MMRF CoMMpass trial allowed assessment of practice patterns in the United States both inside and outside of academic medical centers. AA appear to be treated less aggressively, possibly explaining shorter survival despite more favorable cytogenetics. Second, high-risk disease does not appear to be treated more aggressively, even in younger patients with excellent performance status. This presented data must be interpreted with caution since this trial does not capture the treating physician's decision-making, nor survival data. Disclosures Girnius: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document