The Effect of Rituximab on Mobilization with AMD3100 Plus G-CSF in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory NHL or HD.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1912-1912
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Amanda M. Cook ◽  
Christopher Flowers ◽  
Amelia A. Langston ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  

Abstract The optimal therapy for patients with chemotherapy sensitive relapsed or refractory lymphoma is high dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell rescue. Rituximab (R) has been added to salvage regimens to increase response rate, thereby making more patients eligible for high dose therapy. However, when R is used prior to the salvage regimen, it has been associated with a delay in platelet engraftment (Hoerr et al, J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 15;22:4561–6). We have previously noted in a retrospective review of 117 patients with lymphoma treated with high dose therapy and autologous HSC transplant that concurrent treatment with R did not impact stem cell collection or post transplant engraftment (Kaufman et al, BBMT, February 2005, Sup 1, [11.2] 6). AMD3100 (plerixafor) is a CXCR4 inhibitor that, when used with G-CSF, more effectively mobilizes stem cells than G-CSF alone. In order to test the hypothesis that R does not negatively impact stem cell collection or post-transplant engraftment when AMD3100 is used with G-CSF, we performed a prospective trial of the use of AMD3100, G-CSF and R for patients with CD20 (+) relapsed chemosensitive lymphoma versus the use of AMD3100 and G-CSF for patients with CD20 (−) relapsed chemosensitive lymphoma. Patients were treated with 2 cycles of ICE ± R depending on CD20 status of the malignant cell. Patients who had a response proceeded to mobilization with AMD3100 and G-CSF for the CD20 (−) group (Arm A) or AMD3100, G-CSF, and four weekly doses of R at 375 mg/m2 (two doses prior to G-CSF and AMD3100, and two doses after) for the CD20 (+) group (Arm B). After collection, patients were treated with high dose therapy with targeted intravenous busulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide followed by autologous HSC transplantation. Patient demographics, mobilization characteristics, graft yield, engraftment data, and toxicity were assessed. 21 patients have been accrued. 11 in Arm A (10 Hodgkin Lymphoma {HL} and 1 with Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma) and 10 in Arm B (2 HL and 7 NHL, and 1 with a composite HL/NHL). The median number of days of collection was 2 for each arm. The median CD34 (+) collected was 4.64 * 106 CD34+ cells/kg in Arm A compared to 5.25 * 106 CD34+ cells/kg in Arm B (p=0.6) The median number of CD34(+)/CD38(−) was similar for both arms. As expected from in vivo B-cell depletion, the percentage of CD19 (+) cells in the product was decreased in Arm B compared to Arm A (2.24% vs. 0.09%, p<0.002). R treated patients did not experience increased serious adverse events. All patients in both arms had durable and equivalent neutrophil and platelet engraftment (Table 1). In conclusion, rituximab can be administered safely to patients when AMD3100 and G-CSF are used for collection of hematopoietic stem cells. Importantly, no negative impact on graft characteristics or engraftment was perceived. Further trials are planned. Table 1: Engraftment Arm A Arm B p value N 11 10 CD 20 status negative positive Median Day to Neutrophil Engraftment 12 11.5 0.39 Median Day to Platelet Engraftment 17 17 0.72 Median Day 100 Total WBC 4.0 3.5 0.55 Median Day 100 Platelet Count 179 178 0.77

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5822-5822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Sauer ◽  
Andreas Marco Fischer ◽  
Andrea Fraenzle ◽  
Christina Kunz ◽  
Maximilian Merz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Bone disease is a hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) and destructive osteolytic bone lesions affect more than 80 % of patients resulting in pain, spinal cord compression and a reduced quality of life. Local radiation therapy (RT) is generally used to achieve rapid improvement of bone pain, control of local tumor growth and recalcification of osseous lesions. However, patients with a high tumor burden, eligible for high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) require systemic treatment with three to four cycles of induction therapy followed by stem cell harvest and high dose therapy. So far, it remains uncertain, if RT prior to mobilization influences stem cell harvest in newly diagnosed patients with MM. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the impact of RT on stem cell harvest and outcome in 168 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM (median age 57 years, range 28-73 years). All patients received RT to symptomatic lytic bone lesions before (n=114) or after (n=54) stem cell harvest and high dose therapy. A median of three cycles induction therapy was applied followed by mobilization therapy before stem cell harvest and high dose therapy. We analyzed, whether RT before stem cell collection influenced the number of leukaphereses needed to achieve stem cell yield, the number of stem cells collected per leukapheresis and the total number of collected stem cells. Additionally, we investigated if timing of RT influenced progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after high-dose therapy and ASCT. Results: Patients receiving RT before stem cell harvest needed more than one leukapheresis to collect the planned number of stem cells (before: 68.8%; after: 44.2%; p=0.09). The median number of stem cells collected per leukapheresis was significantly lower in patients treated with RT before harvest (before: 2.6 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg / bodyweight, after: 3.8 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg / bodyweight; p<0.001). Also the total median number of collected stem cells was significantly lower in the group treated with RT before stem cell harvest (before: 9.0 x 106 CD34+ cells per kg/bodyweight, after: 10.3 x 106CD34+ cells per kg/bodyweight; p<0.02). Patients treated with RT after stem cell harvest showed a longer PFS (48.9 months) compared to the group receiving RT before harvest (36.3 months; p=0.09). No effect on OS was observed. Conclusion: We demonstrate that RT before stem cell harvest negatively influences stem cell collection in patients with symptomatic MM. Furthermore, we observed a negative trend towards shorter PFS in the group treated with RT before stem cell collection. Therefore, we suggest applying RT after stem cell mobilization in transplant-eligible patients with MM if clinically possible. Disclosures Wuchter: Sanofi: Honoraria; ETICHO: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Polyphor: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.


1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4-10
Author(s):  
Gerald J. Elfenbein

Objective. Discussion of the roles of hematopoietic growth factors and the role of stem cells in shortening aplasia after transplant. In addition, the role of the treatment regimen in determining the length of aplasia. Data Sources. A series of original research stud ies from H. Lee Moffitt Cancer center which was published from 1993 to the present. In addition, selected references were reviewed and quoted to support selective arguments. Study Selection. Since 1989 data from four allo cated, parallel, high-dose phase I/II trials conducted at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fla and include the following treatment regimens: (1) ifosfamide, carbo platin, and etoposide (ICE); (2) mitoxantrone and thio tepa (MITT); (3) busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BUCY2); and (4) Taxol, Novantrone, thiotepa (TNT). The results of hematopoietic recovery from consecutive patients allocated on these trials will be discussed. Data Extraction. Granulocyte engraftment was defined as having occurred when an absolute granu locyte count of 500/μL has been surpassed on 3 or more consecutive days. The period of aplasia was defined as the number of days from the day of stem cell infusion to the day of engraftment. The period of granulocyte engraftment and aplasia was examined comparatively as a function of the source of stem cells given to the patient at their initial reinfusion. Time to engraftment was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Method and probability curves were compared by logrank analysis. Data Synthesis. The duration of aplasia after high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation deter mines the risk of opportunistic infection and the cost of the transplant. Prospective, randomized, controlled trials for both sargramostim and filgrastim have clearly demonstrated a significantly shorter period of aplasia produced by high-dose therapy by several days. From sequential comparison trials, it appears that filgrastim may be superior to sargramostim in shortening aplasia after bone marrow stem cell transplantation following high-dose therapy. Erythropoietin, while not shorten ing the period of aplasia, has been demonstrated to reduce erythrocyte transfusion requirements; whereas the question about cost-effectiveness remains to be unanswered. In comparing granulocyte recovery of bone marrow stem cell transplants with peripheral blood stem cell transplants, both perform similarly, especially, if collected under identical stimulatory conditions. Both the mobilizing regimen and the treatment regimen, but not the anatomic compart ment, are significant factors which determine the speed of engraftment after high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem cells are transplanted. Conclusions. The purpose of high-dose therapy is to improve the cure rate for selected malignancies. Shortening aplasia can reduce the death rate from infections but only has a marginal impact on the cure rate as the death rate is relatively low. It behooves us, then, to develop the best treatment and with that regimen determine how best to shorten the period of aplasia.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2926-2926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Nicholas M. Fisher ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Michael H. Tomasson ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
...  

Abstract Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a selective inhibitor of the proteasome approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Emerging evidence indicates that bortezomib is also effective alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents in the front-line treatment of myeloma. Given the superiority of high dose therapy with autologous transplant compared to conventional therapy in myeloma, the application of bortezomib to novel front-line therapies depends in part on its effects on subsequent stem cell mobilization and engraftment. Previous reports have demonstrated successful chemotherapy induced mobilization of stem cells following bortezomib. To determine the effects of bortezomib on cytokine mobilization and engraftment of stem cells, we conducted a study of bortezomib administered prior to high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant. Following induction therapy, two cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 were administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. One week after the last dose of bortezomib, stem cells were mobilized with G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day for 5 days and harvested by large volume apheresis (20 L/day) until a minimum of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Melphalan 100 mg/m2/day x 2 days was administered followed by reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells 48 hours later. GM-CSF 250 mcg/m2/day was given post-transplant until the ANC ≥ 1,500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days. Forty patients were enrolled in this study with 37 continuing on to autologous transplant. Study population consists of 24 male and 16 female patients with the median age at enrollment of 56 years (range 38–69). Myeloma characteristics at diagnosis were as follows (number of patients): IgG (29), IgA (10), light chain only (1), with stage I (1), II (12), or stage III (27) disease. Prior to receiving bortezomib, 20 patients had been previously treated with an anthracycline containing regimen and 22 with thalidomide for induction therapy. Two patients did not receive any prior chemotherapy. Two patients did not proceed to stem cell harvest, one secondary to disease progression on bortezomib and the other because of a stroke suffered during G-CSF mobilization. Stem cell collection was successful in 37 of 38 patients with the first collection containing a median of 4.24 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The majority of patients (29) required a single pheresis session, 7 required two sessions, and 1 patient required 5 sessions. The only patient failing stem cell collection had received extensive radiation to the pelvis in addition to a prior history of breast cancer for which she received adjuvant chemotherapy. All transplanted patients successfully engrafted with a median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥ 500/mm3) of 11 days (range 9–14 days). Platelet engraftment (platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 sustained for 7 days without transfusion) occurred at a median of 11 days (range 9–31 days). In an intention-to-treat analysis at 100 days post-transplant, we observed a compete response (CR) in 6 patients (15%), a near CR in 10 patients (25%) with an additional 19 partial responses (48%) for an overall response rate of 88%. We conclude that pre-transplant treatment with 2 cycles of bortezomib following anthracycline or thalidomide containing chemotherapy does not adversely affect stem cell yield or time to engraftment and results in high CR / near CR rates.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4848-4848
Author(s):  
Brad Rybinski ◽  
Ashraf Z. Badros ◽  
Aaron P. Rapoport ◽  
Mehmet Hakan Kocoglu

Abstract Introduction: Standard induction therapy for multiple myeloma consists of 3-6 cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) or carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). Receiving greater than 6 cycles of a lenalidomide containing regimen is thought to negatively impact the ability to collect sufficient CD34+ stem cells for autologous stem cell transplant (Kumar, Dispenzieri et al. 2007, Bhutani, Zonder et al. 2013). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, at least 20 patients at University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMGCC) had transplant postponed, potentially resulting in prolonged exposure to lenalidomide containing induction regimens. Here, in the context of modern stem cell mobilization methods, we describe a retrospective study that suggests prolonged induction does not inhibit adequate stem cell collection for transplant. Methods: By chart review, we identified 56 patients with multiple myeloma who received induction with VRd or KRd and underwent apheresis or stem cell transplant at UMGCC between 10/1/19 and 10/1/20. Patients were excluded if they received more than 2 cycles of a different induction regimen, had a past medical history of an inborn hematological disorder, or participated in a clinical trial of novel stem cell mobilization therapy. We defined 1 cycle of VRd or KRd as 1 cycle of "lenalidomide containing regimen". In accordance with routine clinical practice, we defined standard induction as having received 3-6 cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen and prolonged induction as having received 7 or more cycles. Results: 29 patients received standard induction (Standard induction cohort) and 27 received prolonged induction (Prolonged induction cohort) with lenalidomide containing regimens. The median number of cycles received by the Standard cohort was 6 (range 4-6), and the median number of cycles received by the Prolonged cohort was 8 (range 7-13). The frequency of KRd use was similar between patients who received standard induction and prolonged induction (27.58% vs. 25.93%, respectively). Standard induction and Prolonged induction cohorts were similar with respect to clinical characteristics (Fig 1), as well as the mobilization regimen used for stem cell collection (p = 0.6829). 55/56 patients collected sufficient stem cells for 1 transplant (≥ 4 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg), and 40/56 patients collected sufficient cells for 2 transplants (≥ 8 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg). There was no significant difference in the total CD34+ stem cells collected at completion of apheresis between standard and prolonged induction (10.41 and 10.45 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.968, Fig 2). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the number of cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen a patient received and total CD34+ cells collected (R 2 = 0.0073, p = 0.5324). Although prolonged induction did not affect final stem yield, prolonged induction could increase the apheresis time required for adequate collection or result in more frequent need for plerixafor rescue. There was no significant difference in the total number of stem cells collected after day 1 of apheresis between patients who received standard or prolonged induction (8.72 vs. 7.96 x 10 6 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.557). However, patients who received prolonged induction were more likely to require 2 days of apheresis (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.1625) and there was a trend toward significance in which patients who received prolonged induction underwent apheresis longer than patients who received standard induction (468 vs 382 minutes, respectively, p = 0.0928, Fig 3). In addition, longer apheresis time was associated with more cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen, which neared statistical significance (R 2 = 0.0624, p = 0.0658, Fig 4). There was no significant difference between standard and prolonged induction with respect to the frequency of plerixafor rescue. Conclusions: Prolonged induction with lenalidomide containing regimens does not impair adequate stem cell collection for autologous transplant. Prolonged induction may increase the apheresis time required to collect sufficient stem cells for transplant, but ultimately clinicians should be re-assured that extending induction when necessary is not likely to increase the risk of collection failure. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badros: Janssen: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1396-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Joseph G. Rajendran ◽  
Ted A. Gooley ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Darrell R. Fisher ◽  
...  

Purpose The majority of patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are older than 60 years, yet they are often denied potentially curative high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantations (ASCT) because of the risk of excessive treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Myeloablative anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) can deliver curative radiation doses to tumor sites while limiting exposure to normal organs and may be particularly suited for older adults requiring high-dose therapy. Patients and Methods Patients older than 60 years with relapsed B-cell NHL (B-NHL) received infusions of tositumomab anti-CD20 antibody labeled with 185 to 370 Mbq (5 to 10 mCi) [131I]-tracer for dosimetry purposes followed 10 days later by individualized therapeutic infusions of [131I]tositumomab (median, 19.4 Gbq [525 mCi]; range, 12.1 to 42.7 Gbq [328 to 1,154 mCi]) to deliver 25 to 27 Gy to the critical normal organ receiving the highest radiation dose. ASCT was performed approximately 2 weeks after therapy. Results Twenty-four patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 60 to 76 years), who had received a median of four prior regimens (range, two to 14 regimens), were treated. Thirteen patients (54%) had chemotherapy-resistant disease. The estimated 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 59% and 51%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 2.9 years (range, 1 to 6 years). All patients experienced expected myeloablation with engraftment of platelets (≥ 20 K/μL) and neutrophils (≥ 500/μL), occurring at a median of 9 and 15 days after ASCT, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths, and only two patients experienced grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Conclusion Myeloablative RIT and ASCT is a safe and effective therapeutic option for older adults with relapsed B-NHL.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2258-2258
Author(s):  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Roger N Pearse ◽  
Morton Coleman ◽  
David Bernstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2258 Background: Prior use of lenalidomide beyond 6 cycles of therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to negatively impact stem cell yield, but this phenomenon can be overcome with the addition of high-dose cyclophosphamide to standard G-CSF mobilization. We hypothesized that the use of plerixafor (Mozobil®) would compare similarly to chemotherapy in rescuing the ability to collect stem cells in lenalidomide-treated myeloma. Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization (PG) to chemotherapy + G-CSF (CG) (either high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3g/m2 or DCEP [4-day infusional dexamethasone/ cyclophosphamide/ etoposide/cisplatin]) in 49 consecutive stem cell collection attempts in patients with MM exposed to prior lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was the ability to collect sufficient stem cells for at least two transplants (minimum 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg), comparing results in terms of total exposure to lenalidomide and time elapsed from lenalidomide exposure until the mobilization attempt. The secondary endpoint was number of apheresis days required to meet collection goal. Resilts: Twenty-four patients underwent PG mobilization and twenty-five with CG (21 with G-CSF + cyclophosphamide, 4 with G-CSF+DCEP). The two groups did not differ in terms of total amount of lenalidomide exposure: median number of lenalidomide cycles for patients mobilized with PG was 6.5 (range 1.2–86.6), vs. 6 (range 2–21.6), for patients mobilized with CG (P = 0.663). The median time between mobilization and last lenalidomide dose was also similar between the two groups: 57.5 (range 12–462) days for PG vs. 154 (range 27–805) days for CG (P = 0.101). There was an equivalent rate of successful collection of 100% for PG and 96% for CG, P = 0.322. One patient failed collection in the CG group due to emergent hospitalization for septic shock during a period of neutropenia; no patient collected with PG had a serious adverse event that interrupted the collection process. Stem cell yield did not differ between the two arms (13.9 vs. 18.8 × 106 million CD34+ cells/kg for PG vs. CG respectively, P = 0.083). Average time to collection goal was also equal, with a median of time of 1 day required in both groups, (range 1–2 days for PG, 1–5 days for CG, P = 0.073). There was no relationship between amount of lenalidomide exposure and stem cell yield with either PG (P = 0.243) or CG (P = 0.867). Conclusion: A plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization schedule is equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy + G-CSF in obtaining adequate numbers of stem cells for two autologous stem cell transplants in patients with MM exposed to lenalidomide; however, PG may be a less toxic approach than chemomobilization. Number of lenalidomide cycles has no impact on chances of stem cell collection success using either method. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Corp: Speakers Bureau. Zafar: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 316-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Landau ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
James E. Hoffman ◽  
Christina Bello ◽  
Elizabeth Hoover ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 316 Introduction: Hematopoietic stem cell migration out of the bone marrow is essential for effective and successful stem cell transplantation. Sympathetic nervous system signaling has been shown to regulate hematopoietic stem cell egress from bone marrow. Ablation of adrenergic neurotransmission in animal models indicates that norepinephrine signaling controls granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) -induced osteoblast suppression, CXCL-12 (or stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1)) down regulation and hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization (Katayama Y, et al. Cell 2006). In addition, β adrenergic agonists and antagonists enhance and reduce stem cell mobilization, respectively. High dose therapy and stem cell rescue following G-CSF mobilization is a standard approach to the treatment of patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. In patients with AL amyloidosis, we prospectively studied the relationship between catecholamine levels and the efficiency of stem cell collection. Methods: In AL amyloidosis patients enrolled on a phase II clinical trial using G-CSF mobilization and high dose melphalan conditioning, 24 h urine samples were collected and analyzed for epinephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine excretion before G-CSF administration and after stem cell collection was completed. Statistical analysis included the Spearman Rank Coefficient (r), Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and Signed rank test. Results: In 39 patients with AL Amyloidosis collected on study, median CD34+ cells collected per kg was 8.3 × 106 (IQR 5,12.3) in a median of 2 (IQR 2,3) collections. The median number of CD34+ cells infused on day 0 was 4.7 × 106 (IQR 3.8, 6) per kg and time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC > 500 × 2 days) was 9 (IQR 9, 11) days. Baseline urinary excretion of epinephrine and dopamine correlated with total number of CD34+ cells per kg collected (r = 0.33, P = 0.005; and r = 0.47, P = 0.05, respectively). An optimal collection outcome defined as > 5 × 106CD34+ cells in 2 collections was achieved by 25/39 patients and was associated with higher baseline epinephrine (median 7 versus 4mcg/24h, P = 0.02) and dopamine (median 220 versus 156mcg/24h, P = 0.05) but not norepinephrine levels. When comparing baseline and post collection catecholamine levels, only dopamine values changed significantly from before to after stem cell collection (P = <0.0001). Patients with renal involvement as the only site of disease (N= 16) collected greater total CD34+ stem cells per kg (median 11.4 versus 6, P = 0.002) than patients with other sites or more than one site of disease (N=23). There was no correlation between the number of stem cells infused and the time to engraftment. Conclusion: Consistent with the notion that the sympathetic nervous system regulates the egress of progenitor cells from their niche, we found that baseline epinephrine and dopamine excretion is associated with greater total and more efficiently collected CD34+ stem cells following G-CSF mobilization in patients with AL amyloidosis. In mouse models G-CSF-induced mobilization requires peripheral adrenergic signals and reduces norepinephrine in the bone (Katayama Y, et al. Cell 2006). Reduced dopamine excretion following G-CSF administration in this study may indicate that circulating catecholamines may provide a marker for the overall sympathetic tone that could predict mobilization efficiency in humans. Further, this study supports other results on the role of dopamine in progenitor migration (Spiegel A, et al. Nat Immunol. 2007) and suggests an important role of dopamine in G-CSF-induced mobilization in patients with AL amyloidosis. Together, these data suggest that modulation of the sympathetic nervous system to enhance hematopoietic stem cell mobilization should be explored and that approaches such as the one we describe may guide G-CSF mobilization with respect to the need for Plerixafor. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document