Outcome of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Low Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3306-3306
Author(s):  
Ziad U. Khan ◽  
Rima M Saliba ◽  
Suhail Qureshi ◽  
Chitra Hosing ◽  
Sergio A Giralt ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy and Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies. A high risk of regimen-related toxicity limits this treatment only for patients with excellent organ-system function. A low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 45% is considered to be a major risk factor for post-transplant cardiac toxicity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). However, several patients with advanced hematologic malignancies and low LVEF can potentially benefit from this therapy. To address this issue, we evaluated the frequency of cardiac toxicity and NRM in 56 patients with low LVEF undergoing allo SCT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on 56 patients with baseline low LVEF who received allo SCT between January 2000 and February 2006 at our institution. Pre-transplant evaluation included an electrocardiogram and bidimensional echocardiogram or gated cardiac scan. Cardiac toxicity was defined as congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial/ventricular arrhythmia or an acute coronary syndrome. Of the 56 patients, 22 received a myeloablative regimen (16 busulfan-based, 6 total body irradiation-based) while 34 patients received a fludarabine-based reduced intensity conditioning regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (41%) received allo SCT from an unrelated donor. Acute leukemia was the reason for allo SCT in 32 (57%) patients. Baseline LVEF within 30 days pre-transplant ranged 20 to 45%. At their 6 month follow-up, cardiac toxicity was seen in 7 (12%) patients. Toxicity included congestive heart failure (CHF) in 4 (7%) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 4 (7%). One patient had both CHF and AF. There were no documented episodes of acute coronary syndrome. Cumulative incidence of NRM at 100 days was 12%; none of the deaths were attributable to cardiac causes. These results were comparable to allo SCT performed in patients with normal LVEF. Variables such as age, LVEF, type of transplant, or the underlying disease did not emerge as significant predictors of post-transplant cardiac toxicity or NRM. CONCLUSION: Patients with low LVEF (<45%) are acceptable candidates for allo SCT. A prospective study with stratification of cardiac risk factors is warranted in patients with low LVEF.

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Rajib Rajbhandari

Acule coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure are still among challenging problems in the field of cardiovascular medicine despite many advances in the field. Stem cell therapy has come as a new hope and a promise for the hopeless.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-hua Han ◽  
Chang-qian Wang ◽  
Jun-feng Zhang ◽  
Jun Gu

Abstract BackgroundIt was indicated that sacubitril-valsartan could improve the clinical prognosis in specific phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients compared with valsartan. However, there is lack of evidence of the comparative effectiveness in HFpEF patients following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the selection between sacubitril-valsartan and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in HFpEF after ACS confered a prognostic benefit. MethodsUsing a propensity score matching of 1:2 ratio, this retrospective claims database study compared sacubitril-valsartan prescription (n=85) and ACEI/ARB therapy (n=170) in patients with HFpEF following ACS. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between treatment and composite endpoints (all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure). ResultsWith a follow-up of 2 years, 52 patients (20.4%) either died from any cause or were hospitalized for heart failure, in which 10 patients (11.8%) with prescribed with sacubitril-valsartan and 42 patients (24.7%) treated with ACEI/ARB (P=0.016). Sacubitril-valsartan therapy was beneficial in N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptid (NT-proBNP) reduction as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change. And Cox proportional hazards regression model revealed that sacubitril-valsartan prescription (HR 0.473, 95% CI: 0.233-0.961, P=0.038) was associated with a reduced risk of the occurrence of composite endpoints.ConclusionLong-term sacubitril-valsartan exposure was associated with protective effects in terms of the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with HFpEF following ACS.


Angiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 886-893
Author(s):  
María Cespón-Fernández ◽  
Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín ◽  
Emad Abu-Assi ◽  
Isabel Muñoz Pousa ◽  
Berenice Caneiro Queija ◽  
...  

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) showed comparable survival results in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, there is lack of evidence of the comparative effectiveness in preserved LVEF patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the selection between ACEi and ARB in preserved LVEF after an ACS confers a prognostic benefit, based on real life results. We analyzed a cohort of 3006 contemporary patients with LVEF ≥40% after an ACS. A propensity score matching and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the association between treatment and events (death, acute myocardial infarction [AMI], HF, and combined event) for a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 2.1 years. We found no significant differences between ACEi/ARB for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] for ARB: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.70-1.29), AMI (HR for ARB: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.95-1.89), HF (HR for ARB: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.85-1.45), or combined end point (death, AMI and HF: HR for ARB: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.92-1.40). In conclusion, there are no prognostic differences between the use of ACEi and ARB in patients with LVEF ≥40% after ACS. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175394472097774
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saad ◽  
Andrisael Garcia Lacoste ◽  
Pooja Balar ◽  
Aiyi Zhang ◽  
Timothy J. Vittorio

Introduction: Thyroid hormone (TH) has an essential role on the functional capability of cardiac muscle with its gene modulation and induction of vasodilatory effects. There is considerable evidence to suggest the role of TH in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but less is known about its prognostic role in heart failure (HF) patients. We aim to evaluate the association between subclinical hypothyroid state (SCHS) and event rates including 30-day all-cause and HF readmission in patients with an index hospitalization for acute HF syndrome (AHFS). Methodology: A retrospective chart review analysis of 2335 patients admitted with the diagnosis of AHFS between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 was conducted. SCHS was defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level >4.50 mIU/L with a normal thyroxine (T4) level. Patients with pre-existing thyroid disease or receiving thyroid replacement therapy were excluded. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was defined as having LVEF ⩽40%. Percentage of 30-day, 3-month and 6-month all-cause readmission and mortality rates were calculated in both cohorts of AHFS (HFpEF and HFrEF) with and without SCHS. Results: The mean age of the 2335 AHFS population was 65 (±14.8) years. Of the 2335 patients admitted with AHFS, 1228 (52.6%) patients were found to have HFrEF and 1107 (47.4%) with HFpEF. There were 170 (7.3%) patients with AHFS found to have SCHS. There were more males than females (54% versus 46%). The percentage of hospital readmission within 30 days was higher for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFrEF group (42% versus 30%, p = 0.001). Hospital readmission within 30 days for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFpEF group did not differ (36.5% versus 31%, p = 0.47). Additionally, all-cause mortality was higher among patients with SCHS compared with patients without SCHS in the HFrEF group (18.7% versus 7.0%, p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was found similar in both arms of the HFpEF group (9.5% versus 7.7%, p = 0.73). Conclusion: During an index hospital admission for AHFS, SCHS was an independent predictor of readmission in 30 days in patients with HFrEF but not in patients with HFpEF. Additionally, it was related to adverse outcome such as all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients but not in HFpEF patients. Further studies regarding the concept of tissue thyroid and the potential for a therapeutic target are warranted.


2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 382-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Nagashima ◽  
Naomi Kawashiro-Hirata ◽  
Kimiharu Imamura ◽  
Ken Shimamoto ◽  
Masatoshi Kawana ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document