Achievement of CR and nCR Before and After First High-Dose Therapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Major Marker for Long-Term Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3400-3400
Author(s):  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Gerlinde Egerer ◽  
Ute Hegenbart ◽  
Markus Munder ◽  
Thomas Hielscher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract Abstract 3400 Poster Board III-288 To analyse the impact of complete response (CR), near CR (nCR) and very good partial response (VGPR) before and after first high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), we evaluated all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent an ASCT in frontline treatment at our centre. The transplantations were performed between June 1992 and February 2009 giving a minimum follow up of 5 months after ASCT. The retrospective analysis included a total of 994 patients (579 males and 415 females) with a median age of 58 years at time of first ASCT (range 25 - 76 years). Median follow-up after first ASCT was 5.8 years. All patients suffered from symptomatic MM. Before induction treatment 48%, 31% and 21% of patients were in ISS-stage I, II and III, respectively. The following induction regimes were applied prior to HDT: VAD (n=683), TAD (n=74), PAD (n=64), and other regimes (n= 173). The patients were treated with HDT once (n= 460), twice (n=437) or thrice (n=97). 91 patients received an allogeneic SCT, 30 of these before first progression after ASCT. These were censored for PFS at time of allogeneic SCT. Maintenance therapy (interferon n=332, thalidomide n=203, bortezomib n=48 or others n=13) was administered in 596 patients. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated from the time of first ASCT. The median OS time was 5.7 years and the median PFS was 2.2 years. Log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox PH regression as well as landmark analyses were utilized to assess the prognostic impact of response. We analysed the effect of achievement of CR, of nCR or CR and of VGPR or CR or nCR before and after HDT, respectively. Achieving CR or nCR is a highly significant prognostic factor for PFS and OS before (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively) and after first HDT (both p<0.001). The group including VGPR showed superior outcome when assessed after HDT, driven by the effect of CR/nCR. When adjusting for the effect of age, beta-2 microglobulin before ASCT, albumin before ASCT, new drugs before ASCT (thalidomide and bortezomib; yes/no), second ASCT within 9 months (yes/no), maintenance therapy (yes/no), and date of first ASCT, achieving CR or nCR remained a significant prognostic factor (PFS after ASCT: HR=0.66 [0.54;0.80], p<0.001; OS after ASCT: HR=0.65 [0.51;0.83], p=0.001). In addition, we analyzed the effect of duration of response compared to response achievement per se. Patients who sustained their remission (overall response = PR and better) at 3 yrs after first ASCT had a favourable prognosis with respect to OS compared to patients losing remission. Conclusion: In our single-center cohort achieving CR or nCR before and after first HDT is highly prognostic for PFS and OS in MM. Sustained duration of response is also associated with an improved prognosis (3 years landmark analysis). At our centre we recommend that patients not achieving at least an nCR should be treated with a second cycle of HDT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

scholarly journals Primary Clinical Response of Relmacabtagene Autoleucel in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (r/r FL) in China

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2434-2434
Author(s):  
Yuqin Song ◽  
Zhitao Ying ◽  
Haiyan Yang ◽  
Ye Guo ◽  
Wenyu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract Background Most patients (pts) with r/r FL remain incurable and eventually relapse or progress. Previously, a Ph1 study of relma-cel (NCT03344367) had demonstrated preliminary safety and efficacy in r/r B-NHL pts, including those with r/r FL. A Ph2 pivotal study in r/r FL pts had been enrolled and preliminary efficacy, safety and PK was presented. Methods Adult pts were eligible with histologically confirmed grade (Gr)1-3a r/r FL on the basis of the 2016 WHO Classification, having failed ≥ 2-line prior therapies or relapsed after auto-HSCT, without allogeneic transplant within 90 days or primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, and with ECOG performance score of 0-1. Pts were randomized to receive either 100×10 6 (low dose) or 150×10 6 (high dose) relma-cel (1:1) following fludarabine 25 mg/m 2 & cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m 2 daily×3. Pts were evaluated for efficacy (Cheson, 2014), toxicity (cytokine release syndrome [CRS] by Lee 2014, and others by CTCAE v4.03), and PK (by qPCR and flow cytometry). Primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), frequency/severity of AEs, duration of response (DOR), duration of complete response (DoCR), duration of partial response (DoPR), time to primary remission (TTR), time to primary complete remission (TTCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and CAR-T cell expansion. Disease response was by investigator assessment, a sensitivity analysis was also conducted using an independent review committee. Results Between June 2018 and June 2021, 28 r/r FL pts were enrolled and treated. As of the data cut-off of June 11, 2021, 20 pts were treated with relma-cel with ≥ 1 month of follow-up. Among these 20 pts, the median age was 54.5 years (range, 36-71), 50% of pts were male, 85% had ECOG 0, 10% had a sum of perpendicular diameters (SPD) ≥ 5000 mm 2, and 36% (5/14) had a FLIPI2 score≥ 3. Pts had received a median of 3.5 prior lines of therapy, 6 (30%) pts had received at least five lines of treatment and 65% were refractory to last prior treatment, 85% were relapsed, 50% were both relapsed and refractory. Relma-cel was successfully manufactured in all pts. Best ORR was 100% (19/19), and best CRR was 95% (18/19). For the mITT (n=19, one pt who developed gastric adenocarcinoma, was excluded, but also achieved CR), ORR at 1 month was 100%(19/19) and CRR was 63% (12/19). CRR at 3 months for 17 pts &gt; 3 months post treatment, was 82%(14/17). At a median follow-up of 8.9 months, the median duration of response [DOR], progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. Twenty pts who received relma-cel were evaluable for safety. Gr ≥3 AEs related to relma-cel occurred in 80% of pts, most commonly neutrophil count decreased (35%), lymphocyte count decreased (30%) and white blood cell count decreased (25%). CRS occurred in 35% (all Gr 1), and only 2 pts received tocilizumab. Median CRS onset was 7 days (range, 5-9), with median duration of 5 days. Two (10%) pts experience neurotoxicity (NT), both Gr 1, with onsets of 4 and 9 days, and duration of 25 and 7 days, respectively. No deaths occurred. Safety data, tocilizumab/steroids usage and PK parameters are shown in the Table. Conclusion With median follow-up of 8.9 months, relma-cel treatment in r/r FL pts had resulted in high tumor remission rates and a manageable toxicity profile in the first 20 pts treated. Data for additional patients will be presented. Table： The summary of AEs (AE, TEAE, CRS, NT), the usage of tocilizumab/steroids and PK Parameters Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Yang: JW Therapeutics: Current Employment. Zhang: JW Therapeutics: Current Employment. Ma: JW Therapeutics: Current Employment. Zhou: JW Therapeutics: Current Employment. Zheng: JW Therapeutics: Current Employment.

High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT) for Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin’s Disease.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3061-3061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Bierman ◽  
Hina Naushad ◽  
Fausto Loberiza ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Disease ◽  
Hodgkin’S Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nodular Sclerosis ◽  
Blood Stem Cells

Abstract Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin’s Disease (LPHD) is a B-cell lymphoma that may require different treatment and may have a different natural history than classical Hodgkin’s disease. Although AHSCT is accepted therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin’s disease, there is little information regarding transplantation for LPHD. We performed a retrospective analysis of 19 patients who were treated with AHSCT for relapsed or refractory LPHD at the University of Nebraska Medical Center between April, 1987 and October, 2002. Biopsies of all LPHD patients were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis according to the WHO classification. Patients with a prior or concurrent diagnosis of classical Hodgkin’s disease or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma were excluded. There were 18 men and 1 woman. Median age was 33 years (range 19–52). Thirteen patients (68%) received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens prior to AHSCT, and 6 patients (32%) received 3 or more regimens. Nine patients (47%) received radiation therapy prior to AHSCT. Five patients (26%) had extranodal disease at the time of AHSCT. Five patients (26%) were transplanted with autologous bone marrow, and 14 patients (74%) received peripheral blood stem cells. Six patients (32%) were transplanted with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan), and 13 patients (68%) were treated with CBV (cyclophosphamide, carmustine, etoposide). The results of AHSCT for the 19 patients with LPHD were compared with 229 patients in our database who received AHSCT for relapsed and refractory nodular sclerosis Hodgkin’s disease during the same time period. The characteristics of the groups were similar with respect to age, disease status at the time of AHSCT, stage at AHSCT, amount of treatment prior to AHSCT, and interval between diagnosis and AHSCT. Patients with LPHD were more likely to be males (p<0.001), less likely to have received radiation prior to AHSCT (p=0.06), and more likely to have been transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (p=0.05). The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival following AHSCT for patients with LPHD and nodular sclerosis Hodgkin’s disease was 40% (95% CI 18% to 61%) and 39% (95% CI 33% to 45%), respectively (p=0.30). The actuarial 5-year overall survival following AHSCT for patients with LPHD and classical Hodgkin’s disease was 56% (95% CI 30% to 75%) and 53% (95% CI 46% to 59%), respectively (p=0.36). A multivariate analysis comparing patients with LPHD and those with nodular sclerosis Hodgkin’s disease was performed. The relative risk of treatment failure following AHSCT for patients with nodular sclerosis histology was 1.14 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.12; p=0.67), and the relative risk of death was 1.22 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.41; p=0.56). These results demonstrate that long-term progression-free survival and overall survival can be achieved following high-dose therapy and AHSCT for patients with LPHD. Furthermore, no significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival were identified when results of AHSCT for LPHD and nodular sclerosis Hodgkin’s disease were compared. Although none of the LPHD patients were treated with newer agents such as gemcitabine or rituximab prior to AHSCT, this analysis suggests that high-dose therapy followed by AHSCT may be used for patients with relapsed and refractory LPHD as well as classical Hodgkin’s disease.

Outcomes Following Syngeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: A Matched Comparison to Autologous Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 50-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asad Bashey ◽  
Waleska S. Perez ◽  
Mei-Jie Zhang ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Propensity Scores ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Graft ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Hct

Abstract Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure following autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). Syngeneic HCT offers the advantage of a myeloma-free-graft. However, a potential disadvantage is the lack of a graft versus myeloma effect (GVM). We compared the probabilities of treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease progression, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after syngeneic versus autologous HCT for MM done between 1988 and 2003. Median follow up was &gt;70 months in both groups. 43 syngeneic HCT recipients were matched to 170 autologous HCT recipients using a propensity score. A numerical propensity score for each syngeneic HCT recipient was calculated using the variables of age, Durie-Salmon stage at diagnosis, sensitivity to pretransplant therapy, time from diagnosis to HCT and year of HCT. Propensity scores ranged from 0.004–0.286. Syngeneic HCT recipients (cases) were matched in random order to autologous transplant (control) recipients with similar propensity scores. Patients who underwent tandem transplants were excluded. Median age (range) was 53 and 52 years in cases and controls. Most patients in both groups (60% of cases, 64% of controls) were transplanted within 12 months of diagnosis. Except for a higher proportion of patients with IgG myeloma (59% vs. 39%, p&lt;0.01) and PBSC grafts (92% vs. 51%, p&lt;0.01) in the control group there were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics of the two groups. 5-year outcomes are summarized in the table. 5-year outcome, probability (95% CI) Syngeneic Autologous Treatment-related mortatlity 14 (5–26) 10 (6–15) Disease progression 42 (26–58) 71 (64–78) Progression-free survival 44 (28–60) 19 (13–26) Overall survival 59 (43–74) 40 (32–48) Medican follow up survivors, months 71 (23–161) 85 (3–145) In multivariate analysis, risks of progression and treatment failure were significantly lower after syngeneic than autologous HCT [disease progression RR= 0.43 (95%CI, 0.23–0.78, p=0.004); treatment failure RR= 0.59 (95%CI 0.35–0.98, p=0.04)]. TRM at 1 year was 14% (5–26) in the syngeneic group and 9% (5–13%) in controls (p=0.33). The 5-year risk of mortality was lower in the syngeneic group but the difference was not statistically significant (RR= 0.61, 95%CI 0.36–1.05, p=0.07). Disease recurrence accounted for 79% of deaths in the autologous and 47% in the syngeneic cohort. We conclude that syngeneic HCT for MM results in superior PFS and lower progression rates compared to autologous HCT, confirming previous smaller analyses and emphasizing the importance of a disease-free graft. Interestingly, these data suggest that relapse rates similar to those observed after nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation – another source of tumor free grafts – can occur in the absence of clinical graft versus host disease.

Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone as Induction Therapy for Patients with Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3605-3605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Charise Gleason ◽  
Leonard Heffner ◽  
Sagar Lonial
Keyword(s):  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
One Year

Abstract The optimal induction regimen for patients with symptomatic myeloma who are eligible for transplantation is currently unknown. While thalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective regimen, it only has a 60 to 65% response rate and few complete responses (CR). Bortezomib based inductions have demonstrated a high response rate and an improved CR as well. Recently the IFM reported the initial results of the randomized bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus VAD induction followed by transplant, which demonstrated that fewer patients treated with bortezomib required tandem transplants. Wang et al reported a high induction response rate with the combination of BTD for only 2 cycles given over a 28 day cycle. Here we report our experience with the combination of BTD as induction therapy. 38 patients with symptomatic myeloma were treated with BTD as induction therapy. Patients received standard dose and schedule bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with thalidomide at 100 mg/day, and 8 days of 40 mg dexamethasone every 21 days. The median age was 58 years (38–70) with 19 males. This was first line therapy for 29 patients, second line for 7 patients and 3rd line for 2. 12 patients had ISS stage 2 and 8 had ISS stage 3. The median β2M was 3.4 (1.66–41.89). Median creatinine was 1.1 (0.6–21.0). Nineteen patients had an IgG paraprotein, 6 an IgA, and 16 patients had light chain disease. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (2–8). Fifteen patients developed neuropathy of any grade. One patient developed grade 3 neuropathy. The overall response rate (CR, VGPR, plus PR) was 92%, with 58% of patients achieving a VGPR or better, and 21% of patients achieving an immunofixation negative CR. 1 patient had a minimal response and 2 patients had progressive disease (both patients presented with plasma cell leukemia). These two patients were treated with the combination of BTD with PACE chemotherapy. One of the two died from progressive disease and the other patient remains in complete remission after high dose therapy and autologous transplantation. 29 patients had consolidation therapy with high dose melphalan and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Eight patients have collected stem cells without proceeding with immediate consolidation therapy. After a median follow up of 373 days, median progression free survival and overall survival have not been reached. One year overall survival is 97%. One year progression free survival is 87%. In conclusion, we report a very high response rate with a short course of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone with an acceptable toxicity profile. Follow up of patients in CR treated without high dose therapy and autologous transplant is in progress. Further studies of this active regimen are warranted.

Durable Remission with Salvage Autotransplants in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1227-1227
Author(s):  
Nina Shah ◽  
Khawaja Fraz Ahmed ◽  
Sofia Qureshi ◽  
Jatin Shah ◽  
Robert Z Orlowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Remission Duration

Abstract Abstract 1227 Poster Board I-249 Background In comparison with single autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto HCT), tandem autologous HCT has resulted in longer event-free and overall survival in randomized trials for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Most myeloma patients, however, only receive a single auto HCT. Many of these patients are eligible for a second auto HCT as salvage at the time of relapse. We evaluated the outcome of salvage auto HCT for MM patients treated at our institution. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review and identified 62 MM patients (38 males, 24 females) who received a second auto HCT as salvage between 1/3/1992 and 11/4/2008.. Preparative regimen was high-dose melphalan alone or in combination with other chemotherapy agents, including busulfan, topotecan and bortezomib. Three patients received a combination of thiotepa, busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Results Median interval between the first and salvage auto HCT was 21 months (range 2-81). Median age at salvage HCT was 55 years (37-73) and median prior treatment regimens were 4 (range 2-16). Twelve patients had chromosomal abnormalities on conventional cytogenetic studies. Patients received a median CD34 cell dose of 4 ×106 / kg (range 2.3-11.2). Fourteen patients (22%) experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity after the salvage auto HCT. Two patients died within 100 days with a TRM of 3%. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days (8-38). Responses after salvage auto HCT were as follows: CR+ near CR 15%, PR 48%, with an overall response rate of 63%. Twenty-seven (44%) patients received post auto HCT maintenance therapy. Median follow-up from salvage HCT was 25 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 15.5 and 43.3 months, respectively. Median time to progression after the first and salvage auto HCT was 20 and 12 months, respectively, with total remission duration of 32 months from two HCTs. Median OS from the time of diagnosis was 72 months, comparable to reported results with tandem auto HCT. At last follow up, 20 patients were alive and in remission. Conclusions In selected MM patients a second auto HCT for salvage therapy is well tolerated with acceptable toxicity. The combined remission duration and overall survival are comparable to outcomes with tandem autotransplants. Disclosures Qazilbash: Cephalon: Speakers Bureau.

Combination of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (VD) or Bortezomib, Adriamycine and Dexamethasone (PAD) Followed by High Dose Therapy and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in First-Line Treatment of T(4;14) Multiple Myeloma : a Prospective Study of the MAG Group.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3408-3408
Author(s):  
Lionel Karlin ◽  
David Ghez ◽  
Marie-Olivia Chandesris ◽  
Sylvain Choquet ◽  
Margaret Macro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract Abstract 3408 Poster Board III-296 The t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), leading to the ectopic expression of two potential oncogenes, the Multiple Myeloma Set Gene (MMSET) and the Fibroblast Growth Factor 3 (FGFR3), is found in 15% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with a very poor prognosis. We previously shown in patients under 65 years of age that High Dose Therapy followed by Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (HDT-PBSCT) provides a high response rate (RR) but a very short median relapse-free survival of only 11 months. In addition, relapses are often aggressive and chemoresistant. Thus, more effective regimen is urgently needed. We prospectively studied 23 t(4;14) MM patients treated with 3 or 4 cycles of a combination of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (VD) (n=4) or of Bortezomib, Adriamycine and Dexamethasone (PAD) (n=19) as induction treatment before HDT-PBSCT (Melphalan 200 mg/m2). T(4;14) was detected using real time quantitative PCR searching for IGH/MMSET and FGFR3 transcripts. RR, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range, 33-64). Isotype was IgA in 12 (52%) patients. All patients had stage II or III MM. An elevated serum β2m level (>3.5 mg/L) was found in 14 (61%) patients, and a low haemoglobin (Hb) level (<10 g/dL) in 10. Four presented with renal failure and 5 with hypercalcemia. Three (16%) of 19 patients had a t(4;14) without expression of FGFR3. After induction treatment with VD or PAD, PBSC were successfully harvested with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor only (n=15) or following a cycle of high-dose cyclophosphamide (n= 7). RR after induction treatment was complete response (CR) in 6 (26%) patients, very good partial response (VGPR) in 9 (39%), partial response (PR) in 3. Five patients had refractory or progressive disease (PD), including 1 who died before stem cell mobilization. RR after HDT was CR in 11 (48%), VGPR in 4 (17%) and PR in 4 (overall RR of 82%). Three had PD. With a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 3-32), 9 (39%) patients are alive without relapse, including 4 with a 19, 27, 30 and 32 months follow-up respectively. Twelve (52%) patients relapsed. Two patients died in the first month post HDT from PD. We found a median EFS and OS from initiation of therapy of 14.7 and 30.9 months respectively. EFS was not influenced by Hb and/or serum β2m level. However, we found a significantly longer OS in patients with low β2m (median non reached) as compared to patients with high β2m (median=23.1 months, p=0.04). These preliminary results illustrate the heterogeneity of this disease and indicate that some t(4;14) MM patients seem to benefit from bortezomib containing regimen as induction treatment before HDT in term of EFS and OS. A larger series with a longer median time of follow up will be presented. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Total Therapy 6: Initial Results of Dose-Dense Strategy for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3081-3081
Author(s):  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Alan Mitchell ◽  
Bijay Nair ◽  
Sarah Waheed ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Total Therapy ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Initial Results

Abstract Abstract 3081 Background: We have reported extensively on applying dose-intense total therapy approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), yielding long CR durations in ∼80% GEP-defined low-risk myeloma patients. Herein, we present for the first time the initial results of a phase II trial employing a dose-dense approach in previously treated MM. Patients & Methods: Patients received 5 cycles of combination chemotherapy (Figure 1) followed by maintenance with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone until relapse or disease progression by IMWG 2006 criteria. Overall survival and progression free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival distributions were compared using the log-rank test. Results: 63 patients with previously treated MM were enrolled. The median follow-up from enrollment was 15.6 months. Baseline characteristics included age >=65yr in 37%, ISS stage II/III was seen in 41%/19% of patients, cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) in 37%, and GEP-70 high risk-MM (HRMM) in 26% of patients with available gene expression data. 11 patients (17%) had >2 prior lines of therapy including regimens that contained bortezomib (91%), thalidomide(45%), lenalidomide(81%), melphalan(27%) and steroids(100%). 14 patients (22%) discontinued therapy primarily due to progression, death or toxicity. Cumulative incidence of PR/VGPR/CR at 18 months was 69.4%, 54.8% and 37.0% respectively. Of the 60 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up, 33% had stable disease as the best overall response. The time to achieving PR or better at 6 months was more rapid in HR-MM vs LRMM (63.6% vs. 50%, p=0.008). Hematologic toxicities occurred in all patients (100%), whereas the most common non-hematologic toxicities counting all toxicities (>grades 3) included metabolic/electrolyte disturbances (95%) followed by infections (31%), hepatobiliary (20%) and gastrointestinal (16%) toxicities. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) at 12 months was 90% and 87%, respectively (Figure 2). The OS (96% vs 60%, p=0.0002) and PFS (92% vs 53%, p<0.0001) at 12 months was markedly superior in GEP-70 defined low-risk MM (LRMM) compared with high-risk MM (HRMM). ISS staging and GEP-defined p53 deletion did not impact OS/PFS at 12 months. Conclusions: Dose-dense strategy is highly effective in previously treated LRMM. Even though time to achieving best response was quicker in HRMM, response duration was shorter thus augmenting the significance of sustaining best response rather than depth of response in HR-MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Patient Outcomes with Proteosome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma at an English District General Hospital

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5745-5745
Author(s):  
Anil Vaikunth Kamat ◽  
Tariq Shafi ◽  
Raphael A. Ezekwesili
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

Abstract Bortezomib is a targeted proteosome inhibitor licensed & approved for in multiple myeloma both as first line and in relapsed setting. This is a retrospective non experimental cross sectional quantitative comparative group study using clinical case notes, laboratory & pharmacy records for patients treated with Bortezomib in 2011 & 2012. Outcomes studied included remission status, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival at follow up. The study also looked at the comparative responses of cohort of patients administered Bortezomib through intravenous & subcutaneous route. The cohort consisted of 33 patients, 21 male, 11 female, median age 71 years, first line 10 patients, second line 23 , median number of cycles in 2011 & 2012 – first line 3 & 8 , second line 5 & 4, respectively. In 2011, 8 received intravenous treatment, 9 were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous route whilst all patients from 2012 received subcutaneous Bortezomib. The most frequently used regimen was Bortezomib Dexamethasone ( VD). The overall response rate ( ORR >/= Minor Response) was: First line 70% (7/10) ; Second line 47.8% ( 11/23); median PFS ( Figure 1) 6 months ( First line: 7 months ; Second line : 6 months) and median overall survival ( Figure 2) at follow up: 9 months ; 39.4 % ( 13/33) First line 8.5 months, Second line 11 months. Subcutaneous Bortezomib was equivalent to intravenous Bortezomib in terms of efficacy & tolerance. Of 33 patients, there were 12 dose reductions. Adverse events reported included: peripheral Neuropathy - grade 3 - 6% ( all grades 27.3%); Diarrhoea - grade 3 - 3% (all grades 6%); Nausea / Vomiting - grade 3 - 3% ( all grades 6%) and Second Primary Malignancies - 12% ( 4 of 33). Mortality at follow up was 20 patients from cohort of 33 ; causes included disease progression in 11, second primary malignancy with disease progression in 4, COPD 2, Systemic Amyloidosis 2, Tuberculosis 1 , Multiple co morbidities 1 and Asthma with mechanical failure in single patient. Second primary malignancies ( 4/33) included Prostate carcinoma ( 1), Renal Cell Carcinoma (1), Neuroendocrine tumour ( 1 ) and Unknown Primary in single patient. Beyond second line treatment, majority (14 of 23 patients; 60.9 %) did not have further active treatment. These data indicate that patient outcomes were modest compared to published data from VISTA and APEX trials. Majority of patients did not have further active treatment beyond second line which suggests the most effective treatment strategy should be used upfront as patients may not be fit to have further lines of therapy despite availability of recently introduced novel targeted agents. A higher percentage of second primary malignancies were noticed in this cohort which should be an area of further clinical research. Figure 1: Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2:. Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document