Total Therapy 6: Initial Results of Dose-Dense Strategy for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3081-3081
Author(s):  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Alan Mitchell ◽  
Bijay Nair ◽  
Sarah Waheed ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Total Therapy ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Initial Results

Abstract Abstract 3081 Background: We have reported extensively on applying dose-intense total therapy approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), yielding long CR durations in ∼80% GEP-defined low-risk myeloma patients. Herein, we present for the first time the initial results of a phase II trial employing a dose-dense approach in previously treated MM. Patients & Methods: Patients received 5 cycles of combination chemotherapy (Figure 1) followed by maintenance with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone until relapse or disease progression by IMWG 2006 criteria. Overall survival and progression free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival distributions were compared using the log-rank test. Results: 63 patients with previously treated MM were enrolled. The median follow-up from enrollment was 15.6 months. Baseline characteristics included age >=65yr in 37%, ISS stage II/III was seen in 41%/19% of patients, cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) in 37%, and GEP-70 high risk-MM (HRMM) in 26% of patients with available gene expression data. 11 patients (17%) had >2 prior lines of therapy including regimens that contained bortezomib (91%), thalidomide(45%), lenalidomide(81%), melphalan(27%) and steroids(100%). 14 patients (22%) discontinued therapy primarily due to progression, death or toxicity. Cumulative incidence of PR/VGPR/CR at 18 months was 69.4%, 54.8% and 37.0% respectively. Of the 60 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up, 33% had stable disease as the best overall response. The time to achieving PR or better at 6 months was more rapid in HR-MM vs LRMM (63.6% vs. 50%, p=0.008). Hematologic toxicities occurred in all patients (100%), whereas the most common non-hematologic toxicities counting all toxicities (>grades 3) included metabolic/electrolyte disturbances (95%) followed by infections (31%), hepatobiliary (20%) and gastrointestinal (16%) toxicities. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) at 12 months was 90% and 87%, respectively (Figure 2). The OS (96% vs 60%, p=0.0002) and PFS (92% vs 53%, p<0.0001) at 12 months was markedly superior in GEP-70 defined low-risk MM (LRMM) compared with high-risk MM (HRMM). ISS staging and GEP-defined p53 deletion did not impact OS/PFS at 12 months. Conclusions: Dose-dense strategy is highly effective in previously treated LRMM. Even though time to achieving best response was quicker in HRMM, response duration was shorter thus augmenting the significance of sustaining best response rather than depth of response in HR-MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

Outcomes Following Syngeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: A Matched Comparison to Autologous Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 50-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asad Bashey ◽  
Waleska S. Perez ◽  
Mei-Jie Zhang ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Propensity Scores ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Graft ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Hct

Abstract Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure following autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). Syngeneic HCT offers the advantage of a myeloma-free-graft. However, a potential disadvantage is the lack of a graft versus myeloma effect (GVM). We compared the probabilities of treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease progression, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after syngeneic versus autologous HCT for MM done between 1988 and 2003. Median follow up was &gt;70 months in both groups. 43 syngeneic HCT recipients were matched to 170 autologous HCT recipients using a propensity score. A numerical propensity score for each syngeneic HCT recipient was calculated using the variables of age, Durie-Salmon stage at diagnosis, sensitivity to pretransplant therapy, time from diagnosis to HCT and year of HCT. Propensity scores ranged from 0.004–0.286. Syngeneic HCT recipients (cases) were matched in random order to autologous transplant (control) recipients with similar propensity scores. Patients who underwent tandem transplants were excluded. Median age (range) was 53 and 52 years in cases and controls. Most patients in both groups (60% of cases, 64% of controls) were transplanted within 12 months of diagnosis. Except for a higher proportion of patients with IgG myeloma (59% vs. 39%, p&lt;0.01) and PBSC grafts (92% vs. 51%, p&lt;0.01) in the control group there were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics of the two groups. 5-year outcomes are summarized in the table. 5-year outcome, probability (95% CI) Syngeneic Autologous Treatment-related mortatlity 14 (5–26) 10 (6–15) Disease progression 42 (26–58) 71 (64–78) Progression-free survival 44 (28–60) 19 (13–26) Overall survival 59 (43–74) 40 (32–48) Medican follow up survivors, months 71 (23–161) 85 (3–145) In multivariate analysis, risks of progression and treatment failure were significantly lower after syngeneic than autologous HCT [disease progression RR= 0.43 (95%CI, 0.23–0.78, p=0.004); treatment failure RR= 0.59 (95%CI 0.35–0.98, p=0.04)]. TRM at 1 year was 14% (5–26) in the syngeneic group and 9% (5–13%) in controls (p=0.33). The 5-year risk of mortality was lower in the syngeneic group but the difference was not statistically significant (RR= 0.61, 95%CI 0.36–1.05, p=0.07). Disease recurrence accounted for 79% of deaths in the autologous and 47% in the syngeneic cohort. We conclude that syngeneic HCT for MM results in superior PFS and lower progression rates compared to autologous HCT, confirming previous smaller analyses and emphasizing the importance of a disease-free graft. Interestingly, these data suggest that relapse rates similar to those observed after nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation – another source of tumor free grafts – can occur in the absence of clinical graft versus host disease.

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Patient Outcomes with Proteosome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma at an English District General Hospital

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5745-5745
Author(s):  
Anil Vaikunth Kamat ◽  
Tariq Shafi ◽  
Raphael A. Ezekwesili
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Second Primary Malignancies

Abstract Bortezomib is a targeted proteosome inhibitor licensed & approved for in multiple myeloma both as first line and in relapsed setting. This is a retrospective non experimental cross sectional quantitative comparative group study using clinical case notes, laboratory & pharmacy records for patients treated with Bortezomib in 2011 & 2012. Outcomes studied included remission status, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival at follow up. The study also looked at the comparative responses of cohort of patients administered Bortezomib through intravenous & subcutaneous route. The cohort consisted of 33 patients, 21 male, 11 female, median age 71 years, first line 10 patients, second line 23 , median number of cycles in 2011 & 2012 – first line 3 & 8 , second line 5 & 4, respectively. In 2011, 8 received intravenous treatment, 9 were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous route whilst all patients from 2012 received subcutaneous Bortezomib. The most frequently used regimen was Bortezomib Dexamethasone ( VD). The overall response rate ( ORR >/= Minor Response) was: First line 70% (7/10) ; Second line 47.8% ( 11/23); median PFS ( Figure 1) 6 months ( First line: 7 months ; Second line : 6 months) and median overall survival ( Figure 2) at follow up: 9 months ; 39.4 % ( 13/33) First line 8.5 months, Second line 11 months. Subcutaneous Bortezomib was equivalent to intravenous Bortezomib in terms of efficacy & tolerance. Of 33 patients, there were 12 dose reductions. Adverse events reported included: peripheral Neuropathy - grade 3 - 6% ( all grades 27.3%); Diarrhoea - grade 3 - 3% (all grades 6%); Nausea / Vomiting - grade 3 - 3% ( all grades 6%) and Second Primary Malignancies - 12% ( 4 of 33). Mortality at follow up was 20 patients from cohort of 33 ; causes included disease progression in 11, second primary malignancy with disease progression in 4, COPD 2, Systemic Amyloidosis 2, Tuberculosis 1 , Multiple co morbidities 1 and Asthma with mechanical failure in single patient. Second primary malignancies ( 4/33) included Prostate carcinoma ( 1), Renal Cell Carcinoma (1), Neuroendocrine tumour ( 1 ) and Unknown Primary in single patient. Beyond second line treatment, majority (14 of 23 patients; 60.9 %) did not have further active treatment. These data indicate that patient outcomes were modest compared to published data from VISTA and APEX trials. Majority of patients did not have further active treatment beyond second line which suggests the most effective treatment strategy should be used upfront as patients may not be fit to have further lines of therapy despite availability of recently introduced novel targeted agents. A higher percentage of second primary malignancies were noticed in this cohort which should be an area of further clinical research. Figure 1: Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Progression free survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Figure 2:. Overall survival with Bortezomib as first line & second line in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

Phase (Ph) I/II study of pembrolizumab (P) with gemcitabine (G) in patients (pts) with previously-treated advanced (Adv) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20652-e20652
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Sanborn ◽  
Regan M. Duffy ◽  
Brenda K Fisher ◽  
Kelly Shea Perlewitz ◽  
Herschel D. Wallen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cross Presentation ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Alternate Source ◽  
Immune Profiling

e20652 Background: P has demonstrated improved survival alone or with chemotherapy in untreated adv NSCLC. G may increase antigen cross-presentation and prime CD8 T cell response via tumor apoptosis. This study evaluated P + G in pts with previously-treated adv NSCLC naïve to anti-PD1. Methods: The study included ph 1 (previously reported), then single arm ph II, 1-3 prior therapies, regardless of PD-L1 status. Treatment: G, 1250 mg/m2, Days (D) 1 & 8 + P 200 mg D 1; 21-day cycles. G given max 6 cycles, P max 2 years. Tumor tissue was collected for PD-L1 (22C3). Immune response via whole blood immunophenotyping and ProtoArray was conducted. Results: 16 pts enrolled. Male/Female: 8/8; Age 53-75 (Median 64.5); ECOG 0/1: 2/14 pts, respectively. Median prior therapies: 1 (Range (R) 1-3). Median cycles: 4 (R 1-24). Primary reason for discontinuation: progression. Toxicity was primarily attributed to G, including Gr 3: neutropenia (5), leukopenia (3), anemia (2); lymphopenia, URI, hyponatremia (1 each). Gr 4: 1 hypoxia attributed to intrapulmonary hemorrhage from G. Other toxicities attributed to both G and P included dyspnea (2), pneumonitis (2) (Gr 3). Progression free survival (PFS): 3.2 months (m) (R 0.6-18.5 m). Overall survival (OS) is not yet mature (4 pts in follow up). 14/16 pts were evaluable for response. Stable disease (SD): 9 (56%); partial response (PR): 2 (13%); progression (PD): 3 (19%). 2 pts discontinued prior to first evaluation (1 pulmonary hemorrhage; 1 clinical progression). 1 pt had SD as best response for 18.5 m before PD. Disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + SD): 56%. 12 pts were PD-L1 evaluable (central). 2 pts had PD-L1 testing through alternate source (22C3). Of the 14 pts with PD-L1 result: PD-L1 0%: 8 (50%); PD-L1 10-40%: 3; ≥50%: 3 (19% each) PFS of 0% PD-L1: 3.75 m (1 PR, 6 SD; DCR 88%). PFS ≥50% PD-L1: 3 m (1 SD, 0 PR). Exploratory immune profiling showed late peripheral immune activation in 3 of 6 pts with Cycle 6 samples (all SD; PFS 5.8 m). ProtoArray analysis is pending. Conclusions: P+G was a feasible combination, without unexpected toxicity. The majority of pts had 0% PD-L1 expression. PFS was not associated with PD-L1 level. PFS did not differ from G or P alone. OS pending. Clinical trial information: NCT02422381.

Achievement of CR and nCR Before and After First High-Dose Therapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Major Marker for Long-Term Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3400-3400
Author(s):  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Gerlinde Egerer ◽  
Ute Hegenbart ◽  
Markus Munder ◽  
Thomas Hielscher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract Abstract 3400 Poster Board III-288 To analyse the impact of complete response (CR), near CR (nCR) and very good partial response (VGPR) before and after first high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), we evaluated all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent an ASCT in frontline treatment at our centre. The transplantations were performed between June 1992 and February 2009 giving a minimum follow up of 5 months after ASCT. The retrospective analysis included a total of 994 patients (579 males and 415 females) with a median age of 58 years at time of first ASCT (range 25 - 76 years). Median follow-up after first ASCT was 5.8 years. All patients suffered from symptomatic MM. Before induction treatment 48%, 31% and 21% of patients were in ISS-stage I, II and III, respectively. The following induction regimes were applied prior to HDT: VAD (n=683), TAD (n=74), PAD (n=64), and other regimes (n= 173). The patients were treated with HDT once (n= 460), twice (n=437) or thrice (n=97). 91 patients received an allogeneic SCT, 30 of these before first progression after ASCT. These were censored for PFS at time of allogeneic SCT. Maintenance therapy (interferon n=332, thalidomide n=203, bortezomib n=48 or others n=13) was administered in 596 patients. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated from the time of first ASCT. The median OS time was 5.7 years and the median PFS was 2.2 years. Log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox PH regression as well as landmark analyses were utilized to assess the prognostic impact of response. We analysed the effect of achievement of CR, of nCR or CR and of VGPR or CR or nCR before and after HDT, respectively. Achieving CR or nCR is a highly significant prognostic factor for PFS and OS before (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively) and after first HDT (both p<0.001). The group including VGPR showed superior outcome when assessed after HDT, driven by the effect of CR/nCR. When adjusting for the effect of age, beta-2 microglobulin before ASCT, albumin before ASCT, new drugs before ASCT (thalidomide and bortezomib; yes/no), second ASCT within 9 months (yes/no), maintenance therapy (yes/no), and date of first ASCT, achieving CR or nCR remained a significant prognostic factor (PFS after ASCT: HR=0.66 [0.54;0.80], p<0.001; OS after ASCT: HR=0.65 [0.51;0.83], p=0.001). In addition, we analyzed the effect of duration of response compared to response achievement per se. Patients who sustained their remission (overall response = PR and better) at 3 yrs after first ASCT had a favourable prognosis with respect to OS compared to patients losing remission. Conclusion: In our single-center cohort achieving CR or nCR before and after first HDT is highly prognostic for PFS and OS in MM. Sustained duration of response is also associated with an improved prognosis (3 years landmark analysis). At our centre we recommend that patients not achieving at least an nCR should be treated with a second cycle of HDT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Phase I/II Study of the Tolerability of Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma Patients with Impaired Renal Function: Pre1003, a Precog LLC Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1856-1856
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Judith Manola ◽  
Amylou Constance Dueck ◽  
Suzanne R Hayman ◽  
Kurt Oettel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Insufficiency ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1856 Background: Lenalidomide has proven to be a highly effective treatment in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), particularly when used in combination with dexamethasone. However, over 30% of patients with myeloma have renal insufficiency and as lenalidomide is renally excreted, little information is available about its use in myeloma patients with impaired kidney function. Defining a safe and effective dose of lenalidomide in this context is critical. Objective: We undertook this study to establish the maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide in three cohorts of patients with different levels of impaired renal function: Group A - patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) between 30 and 60 mL/min, Group B - patients with CrCl <30 mL/min not on dialysis, and Group C - patients with CrCl < 30mL/min who are on dialysis. Secondary endpoints included response rate, progression free survival and overall survival. Methods: Eligible patients had previously treated MM with renal impairment defined as creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min measured within 21 days prior to registration. Patients previously treated with lenalidomide were required to demonstrate clinical response (any duration) or stable disease with progression-free interval of > 6 months from start of that therapy. All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Prophylactic anticoagulation consisted of either 81 mg or 325 mg per day of aspirin. Patients also received lenalidomide orally every 1 or 2 days on days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle, as described below (Table 1). Starting doses were as in US Product Insert. Dose escalation follows a standard 3+3 design. Results: There have been 23 patients enrolled into groups and cohorts as shown in Table 1. Median age was 73 (range 49–89) and 13 (57%) were women. ISS stage was advanced in all patients, 0 in stage 1, 4 (18%) in stage 2 and 19 (82%) in stage 3. The regimen was well tolerated. Indeed, the MTD has not been reached in any of the groups, as no DLTs have occurred to date. The most commonly reported clinical adverse events (all grades, independent of attribution) across all patients included infections, hyperglycemia, constipation, dizziness, hyponatremia, hypocalcemia and tremor. Hematological toxicities (grade 3–4) occurred in 13 out of 21 pts (62%), mostly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Grade 3–4 events at least possibly related to the regimen occurred in 70% and included pneumonia (26%) and otitis media (9%). Response was seen in 14 patients, resulting in an overall response rate of 61%. CR was seen in 1 patient (4%), VGPR in 2 patients (9%), PR in 11 patients (43%), and SD for 9 patients. With median follow-up of 15.5 months, median progression-free survival is 9.8 months and median overall survival is 22 months. Conclusion: Lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a safe and effective regimen in patients with multiple myeloma and renal insufficiency. It is also very well tolerated, although cytopenias are common but manageable. MTD has yet to be reached in each group, allowing for higher doses to be given than previously thought, including 25mg daily (for 21/28 days) in patients with CrCl 30–60 mL/min, 25 mg every other day (for 21/28 days) in patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min not on dialysis, and 10mg daily (for 21/28 days) in patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min on dialysis. These results will provide needed, clinically relevant dosing for lenalidomide in MM patients with renal insufficiency. Disclosures: Kaufman: Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Analysis of 179 Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Treated with Novel Agents Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT): a Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1343-1343
Author(s):  
Joyce Habib ◽  
Neil Dunavin ◽  
Gary Phillips ◽  
Patrick Elder ◽  
Meaghan Tranovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Genetic Profile ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 1343 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy in the United States with an estimated 20,580 new cases in 2009. Over the past decade, the introduction of novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib) have played a pivotal role in improving response rates, duration of response, overall survival (OS) and quality of life. In this study we describe a single center experience with novel agents used for induction followed by high dose chemotherapy (HDT) and first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with MM. Method: A retrospective review of the medical records of 179 newly diagnosed patients with MM seen between October 2006 and December 2009 at The Ohio State University was performed. All patients received novel therapy containing thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide as part of an induction regimen followed by ASCT. All patients received melphalan 140mg/m2 or 200mg/m2 as preparative regimen. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to plot progression free survival and overall survival. Results: Of the 181 patients seen, 2 were excluded because they did not receive a novel agent as part of induction treatment. Of the 179 patients analyzed, median age was 56.8 years (29-80) with 30% of patients older than 60 years. African American represented 19%. Fifty-nine percent were male, 80% had Durie-Salmon (DS) stage III while 25%, 28%, 18% represented International prognostic score (IPS) stage I, II, and III respectively with 27% unknown. Median comorbidity index score was 2 (2-7) and median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90% (70-100). Thirty percent had high risk genetic profile, and 73% received one line of treatment before ASCT. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 8.33 months (4-58). The overall response rate (ORR) prior to transplant was 84% (9% complete (CR), 29% very good partial (VGPR), and 46% partial (PR)). The ORR post ASCT was 89% (CR 45%, VGPR 22%, PR 21%). Non relapse mortality was 1% and 3% at 100 days and 1 year respectively. At a median follow up of 31 months (7-90), 69 patients (38%) had relapsed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 29 months with 1 and 3 years PFS of 79.3% and 61.5% respectively (Fig. 1). The OS was not reached. One and 3 years OS were 93% and 88% respectively (Fig. 1). Univariate analysis showed that time to transplant > 12 months was associated with poor outcome and decreased overall survival (HR 3.30, p = 0.008). High risk genetic profile was also found to be associated with decreased overall survival although this was not statistically significant (HR 2.31, p = 0.070). Multivariate analysis found that only time to transplant > 12 months was an independent predictor of decreased OS. Significant predictors for disease progression were high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months in patients receiving 2 or more treatments before ASCT. Conclusion: Induction with novel agents followed by HDT and ASCT improves CR rate, in our case from 9% to 45%. Median PFS (29 months) was comparable to other published data. OS was not been reached after a median follow up of 31 months. Predictors of progression include high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months. The only significant predictor for survival was time to transplant. Our study suggests that an early transplant may improve OS and PFS. An extended analysis will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Phillips: NCI/NIH: Research Funding; NCCM Grant: Research Funding; ARRA RC2 Grant: Research Funding. Byrd:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding.

Pulsed Cyclophoshamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (CTD) Regimen for Previously Treated Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Long Term Follow up and Disease Control after Subsequent Treatments.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3565-3565
Author(s):  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Athanasios Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Efstathios Kastrtis ◽  
Charis Matsouka ◽  
Despina Barmparoussi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Introduction: The effectiveness of thalidomide based regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma is well established. However, there is still limited data regarding the long term follow up after such regimens and the outcome of patients when they progress and they receive further treatment. In order to answer these questions we reassessed our original series of 43 patients with previously treated multiple myeloma who were treated with a pulsed, oral CTD regimen between December 2000 and April 2002 (Dimopoulos MA, Hematol J2004;5:112). The CTD regimen consisted of oral cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 every 12 hours before meals on days 1 to 5, thalidomide 400 mg p.o. in the evening on days 1 to 5 and 14 to 18 and dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 in the morning after breakfast on days 1 to 5 and 14 to 18. The CTD combination was repeated every 28 days for three courses. Subsequently, responding patients were scheduled to receive maintenance treatment with monthly courses of CTD administered only for the first five days of each month. Patients and Methods: Progression free survival after initiation of CTD was updated in June 2006,ie more than 4 years after inclusion of the last patient. Type of treatment at the time of progression after CTD, response to this treatment and progression free survival were recorded for each patient. Results: Among the 43 patients, 14 had not responded to CTD and 29 (67%) had achieved at least a partial response. The median PFS for all patients was 10 months. As of June 2006, 3 patients remain off treatment and without progression for 55+, 55+ and 56+ months respectively. Thus, 40 patients were analyzed for further treatment and outcome. Ten patients (25%) died before receiving further treatment, 9 patients(23%) received conventional chemotherapy and 21 patients (52%) received continuous thalidomide and dexamethasone(15 patients), melphalan-bortezomib-dexamethasone and intermittent thalidomide (3 patients) or lenalidomide with dexamethasone (3patients). Among the 21 latter patients,6(28%)achieved at least partial response. A response was documented in 31% of CTD-sensitive patients (ie patients who had responded to CTD and then progressed) and in 20% of CTD-resistant patients (ie patients who had not responded to CTD). The median progression free survival of the 21 patients who received retreatment with novel agents plus dexamethosone was 5,3 months and the median survival was 10 months. Among the 9 patients who received conventional chemotherapy only one patient responded and the progression free survival was 2,8 months. Conclusions: After an oral pulsed CTD regimen 7% of patients remain without treatment and free of progression for more than 4 years. Further control of myeloma was achieved in one-third of patients who progressed after CTD and who received further treatment which included a novel agent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document