Transfusional Iron Overload: An Underappreciated Danger in AML Patients?

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4133-4133
Author(s):  
Jacob Rozmus ◽  
Louis D. Wadsworth ◽  
John K. Wu

Abstract Abstract 4133 The survival rate for childhood cancer has improved steadily over the last 3 decades creating an increasing population of survivors. Though this is one of the great successes in medicine, there is a growing awareness that survivors are at increased risk for late therapy related adverse effects including cardiovascular toxicity. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study showed that the standardized mortality ratio for cardiac causes was > 8 times higher than expected and cumulative probability of cardiac death increased 15-25 years after cancer diagnosis.[i] The cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines are well documented in the literature. They are an essential component of treatment for AML. However, their use is limited by dose-related cardiomyopathy. An important factor in anthracycline toxicity is iron's role in promoting the formation of toxic oxygen species. Cardiac tissue is recognized to be especially vulnerable to free radical damage. Anthracyclines cause altered expression of iron-regulated genes and change intracellular iron trafficking. It is known that, dexrazoxane-an iron chelator, is an effective cardioprotective agent against doxorubicin effects in animal models. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends its use in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving a doxorubicin dose of >300 mg/m2.[ii] Dexrazoxane was found to prevent or reduce cardiac injury associated with doxorubicin use in childhood ALL without compromising the anti-leukemic effect.[iii] We hypothesize that cardiomyocytes damaged by anthracyclines are more susceptible to iron accumulation, potentiating anthracycline toxicity in patients with a heavy transfusion burden. Consecutive adolescent patients with AML admitted to our institution were reviewed. These patients received a cumulative anthracycline dose of 200 to 300 mg/m2. Iron loading was estimated from the number of red cell units given. The iron content of a single red cell unit is approximately 200 mg. 10 AML patients received 24-59 units of blood (median 35) over a median of 222 days. This equates to 65-235 mg of iron/kg (median of 129 mg/kg). Iron loading was identified in AML patients due to transfusion. The iron load is less than seen in children with thalassemia but in AML patients, who are known to have increased adverse cardiac events, it is possible that anthracycline induced cardiomyopathy could have been exacerbated by transfused iron. To prove the hypothesis the next step is to investigate T2* MRI detectable myocardial iron deposition and cardiac dysfunction and markers of myocardial injury in AML patients. These observations may provide evidence for using iron chelation therapy in the treatment of AML. [i] Lipshultz S, Alvarez JA, Scully RE. Anthracycline associated cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer. Heart 2008; 94: 525-533 [ii] Carver JR, Shapiro CL, Ng A, et al. ASCO Cancer Survivorship Expert Panel. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical evidence review on the ongoing care of adult cance survivors: cardiac and pulmonary late effects. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3991-4008 [iii] Lipshultz SE, Rifai N, Dalton VM, et al. The effect of dexrazoxane on myocardial injury in doxorubicin-treated children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 145-53 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kelsey Kirkwood ◽  
Michael P. Kosty ◽  
Dean F. Bajorin ◽  
Suanna S. Bruinooge ◽  
Michael A. Goldstein

Reports generated by the workforce information system can be used by ASCO and others in the oncology community to advocate for needed health care system and policy changes to help offset future workforce shortages.


2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 269-274
Author(s):  
Latha Shivakumar ◽  
Marissa Shrader ◽  
Sonia Cunningham ◽  
Jorge E. Cortés ◽  
Diane Gambill

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 880-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Smith ◽  
Sarah Temin ◽  
Erin R. Alesi ◽  
Amy P. Abernethy ◽  
Tracy A. Balboni ◽  
...  

Purpose An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership following publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This PCO addresses the integration of palliative care services into standard oncology practice at the time a person is diagnosed with metastatic or advanced cancer. Clinical Context Palliative care is frequently misconstrued as synonymous with end-of-life care. Palliative care is focused on the relief of suffering, in all of its dimensions, throughout the course of a patient's illness. Although the use of hospice and other palliative care services at the end of life has increased, many patients are enrolled in hospice less than 3 weeks before their death, which limits the benefit they may gain from these services. By potentially improving quality of life (QOL), cost of care, and even survival in patients with metastatic cancer, palliative care has increasing relevance for the care of patients with cancer. Until recently, data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating the benefits of palliative care in patients with metastatic cancer who are also receiving standard oncology care have not been available. Recent Data Seven published RCTs form the basis of this PCO. Provisional Clinical Opinion Based on strong evidence from a phase III RCT, patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer should be offered concurrent palliative care and standard oncologic care at initial diagnosis. While a survival benefit from early involvement of palliative care has not yet been demonstrated in other oncology settings, substantial evidence demonstrates that palliative care—when combined with standard cancer care or as the main focus of care—leads to better patient and caregiver outcomes. These include improvement in symptoms, QOL, and patient satisfaction, with reduced caregiver burden. Earlier involvement of palliative care also leads to more appropriate referral to and use of hospice, and reduced use of futile intensive care. While evidence clarifying optimal delivery of palliative care to improve patient outcomes is evolving, no trials to date have demonstrated harm to patients and caregivers, or excessive costs, from early involvement of palliative care. Therefore, it is the Panel's expert consensus that combined standard oncology care and palliative care should be considered early in the course of illness for any patient with metastatic cancer and/or high symptom burden. Strategies to optimize concurrent palliative care and standard oncology care, with evaluation of its impact on important patient and caregiver outcomes (eg, QOL, survival, health care services utilization, and costs) and on society, should be an area of intense research. NOTE. ASCO's provisional clinical opinions (PCOs) reflect expert consensus based on clinical evidence and literature available at the time they are written and are intended to assist physicians in clinical decision making and identify questions and settings for further research. Because of the rapid flow of scientific information in oncology, new evidence may have emerged since the time a PCO was submitted for publication. PCOs are not continually updated and may not reflect the most recent evidence. PCOs cannot account for individual variation among patients and cannot be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other treatments. It is the responsibility of the treating physician or other health care provider, relying on independent experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine the best course of treatment for the patient. Accordingly, adherence to any PCO is voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding its application to be made by the physician in light of each patient's individual circumstances. ASCO PCOs describe the use of procedures and therapies in clinical trials and cannot be assumed to apply to the use of these interventions in the context of clinical practice. ASCO assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage to persons or property arising out of or related to any use of ASCO's PCOs, or for any errors or omissions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document