Clinical Outcome of CML Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome Complex Variants.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4499-4499
Author(s):  
Santiago del Castillo ◽  
Regina Garcia Delgado ◽  
Laura Entrena ◽  
Agustin M Hernandez ◽  
Arturo Campos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Current State ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Abstract Abstract 4499 INTRODUCTION: The presence of translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 that characterizes the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is occasionally accompanied by more complex variations involving additional exchange of genetic material with other chromosomes. This variants of Philadelphia chromosome have no worse prognosis than those others with the common translocation. MATERIAL: Since 1997 we have diagnosed in our hospital 5 CML patients who didn't show any of these variants. Three women 17, 23 and 76 years old and two men of 36 and 65. All of them diagnosed in chronic phase. Risk stage at diagnosis by Sokal were 1 high, 1 intermediate and 3 low. By Hasford 2 were intermediate end 3 low. Philadelphia chromosome variants involve a third chromosome in 4 cases (translocations 2;9;22, 9;22;12, 9;22;9 and 6;9;22) and in one case involving four chromosomes (translocation 1;2;9;22). Three patients diagnosed before the imatinib approval started treatment with IFN and Ara-C and subsequently changed to Imatinib treatment. Two others started treatment with imatinib directly. RESULTS: All patients had a good outcome with treatment being the current state of 2 patients in complete molecular response (105 and 60 months of follow-up) and 2 patients in Major Molecular Response (146 and 143 months). The 5th patient, a 17 years old woman, has been treated for three months with Imatinib and showed complete haematological response at first month and major cytogenetic response at third month. It is striking in this last patient the fact that two years earlier had been referred for study of myeloid moderate leukocytosis (20,000 leukocytes with circulating myeloid progenitors without anemia, thrombocytosis, or splenomegaly). The patient didn't come to clinic when Bone Marrow Test was cited and two years later resumes the visit continuing with the same leukocytosis in peripheral blood and without splenomegaly unchanged despite not having received any treatment. CONCLUSION: Our experience confirm that this type of patients with complex translocation variants have no worse prognosis than normal translocation under imatinib treatment and suggests that may have a more benign clinical behavior. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Dasatinib Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Pre-Existing BCR-ABL Mutations

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 449-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin C Müller ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
Philipp Erben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Imatinib Resistant ◽  
Dasatinib Treatment

Abstract Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) is an effective BCR-ABL inhibitor that is 325-fold more potent than imatinib and 16-fold more potent than nilotinib in vitro against unmutated BCR-ABL. Across a series of phase II and III trials, dasatinib has demonstrated durable efficacy in patients with CML following resistance, suboptimal response, or intolerance to imatinib. BCR-ABL mutations are an important cause of imatinib failure and suboptimal response. Here, the efficacy of dasatinib in patients with CML-CP who had baseline BCR-ABL mutations following imatinib treatment was analyzed using data from three trials (CA180-013, -017, and -034). Mutational assessment of the BCR-ABL kinase domain was performed using RT-PCR and direct sequencing of peripheral blood cell mRNA. Hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular response rates were reported after ≥24 mos of follow-up. Duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS; in 013/034) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and rates were estimated at the 24-mo time point. Of 1,150 patients with CML-CP who received dasatinib, 1,043 had a baseline mutational assessment and were analyzed further. Of these, 402 patients (39%) had a BCR-ABL mutation, including 8% of 238 imatinib-intolerant and 48% of 805 imatinib-resistant patients. Excluding known polymorphisms, 64 different BCR-ABL mutations were detected affecting 49 amino acids, with G250 (n=61), M351 (n=54), M244 (n=46), F359 (n=42), H396 (n=37), Y253 (n=26), and E255 (n=25) most frequently affected. Dasatinib treatment in patients with or without a baseline BCR-ABL mutation, respectively, resulted in high rates of major cytogenetic response (MCyR; 56% vs 65%), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR; 44% vs 56%), major molecular response (MMR; 33% vs 45%); PFS (70% vs 83%), and OS (89% vs 94%) (Table). After 24 mos, CCyRs in patients with or without a BCR-ABL mutation had been maintained by 84% vs 85%, respectively, of those achieving this response. Among patients with mutations who received dasatinib 100 mg once daily, which has a more favorable clinical safety profile, efficacy and durability were similar (MCyR: 55%; CCyR: 41%; MMR: 36%; PFS: 73%; OS: 90%). In general, high response rates and durable responses were observed in patients with different mutation types, including highly imatinib-resistant mutations in amino acids L248, Y253, E255, F359, and H396. When responses were analyzed according to dasatinib cellular IC50 for individual BCR-ABL mutations, dasatinib efficacy was observed in 44 patients who had any of 5 imatinib-resistant mutations with a dasatinib cellular IC50 >3 nM (Q252H, E255K/V, V299L, and F317L, excluding T315I), including MCyR in 34%, CCyR in 25%, MMR in 18%, PFS in 48%, and OS in 81%. Among patients whose mutations had a dasatinib IC50 ≤3 nM (n=254) or unknown IC50 (n=83), responses and durability were comparable to patients with no BCR-ABL mutation. As expected, few patients with a T315I mutation (IC50 >200 nM; n=21) achieved a response. Among 70 patients with >1 mutation, a MCyR was achieved in 53% and a CCyR in 37%. Among patients with mutational analysis at last follow-up (n=162), 42 (26%) retained a BCR-ABL mutation (20 retained a mutation with IC50 >3 nM), 42 (26%) lost a mutation (5 lost a mutation with IC50 >3 nM), and 44 (27%) developed a new mutation (39 developed a mutation with IC50 >3 nM), with some patients counted in more than one category. Overall, this analysis demonstrates that dasatinib has broad efficacy against all BCR-ABL mutations except for T315l. For patients with BCR-ABL mutations, dasatinib treatment is associated with durable responses and favorable long-term outcomes. Table Analysis by dasatinib IC50 No BCR-ABL mutation BCR-ABL mutation BCR-ABL mutation treated with 100 mg QD >3 nM (excl. T315I) 3 nM* Unknown IC50** Some patients had >1 mutation. *Excluding patients with a concurrent mutation with dasatinib IC50 >3 nM. **Excluding patients with a concurrent mutation with known dasatinib IC50. Patients, n 641 402 49 44 254 83 Response rates (≥24 mos of follow-up), % CHR 93 90 90 82 94 96 MCyR 65 56 55 34 58 73 CCyR 56 44 41 25 47 54 MMR 45 33 36 18 34 43 Median time to MCyR, mos 2.8 2.9 2.8 5.7 2.9 2.8 Median time to CcyR, mos 3.0 5.3 3.0 5.7 5.4 3.4 24-mo PFS (95% CI), % 83 (79.8–86.5) 70 (65.3–75.2) 73 (60.1–86.3) 48 (31.2–64.7) 73 (66.6–78.9) 89 (82.3–96.3) 24-mo OS (95% CI), % 94 (91.4– 95.7) 89 (85.1– 92.1) 90 (81.2– 98.3) 81 (68.8– 93.8) 90 (85.8– 94.2) 96 (91.2–100)

Results of Imatinib Dose Escalation After 36 Months of Follow-up in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Failure or Sub-Optimal Response According to 2006 EuropeanLeukemia Net (ELN) Criteria.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3302-3302
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Paolo Vigneri ◽  
Laura Cannella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 3302 Poster Board III-190 Introduction Imatinib mesylate (IM) given at a daily dose of 400 mg currently represents the gold standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines propose IM dose escalation to rescue those CML patients with either suboptimal response or drug resistance. We report on the long-term efficacy of IM dose escalation in 74 patients with CP-CML after suboptimal response or failure to IM conventional dose. Patients and methods Median age was 50 years (range 19-85), there were 52 males and 22 females. Thirteen patients were classified as hematologic failure (10 primary and 3 secondary), 57 patients as cytogenetic resistance (24 primary and 33 acquired). Three patients escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response and one patient for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months. Fifty-four received IM dose escalation from 400 to 600 mg and 20 patients from 400 to 800 mg. Results Overall, after a median follow-up of 36 months, 68/74 (91.8%) patients maintained or achieved a complete haematologic response (CHR); this was maintained in all patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure or suboptimal response. A major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 41 patients (72%) who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 6/13 (46%) patients who escalated imatinib for hematologic failure (p=0.002). Overall, complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) were achieved in 27 (37%) out of 74 CML patients: of the 13 hematologic failure patients, only 5 achieved CCyR: all patients had prior acquired resistance to imatinib. Of the 57 cytogenetic failure, 22 reached CCR: this response was obtained in 27% of the primary cytogenetic resistant, and in 50% of the acquired cytogenetic resistant patients (p=0.02). Three patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response obtained CCR and complete molecular response (CMR), whereas one patient who escalated the dose for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months did not obtain CMR. Median time to cytogenetic response was 3.5 months. Cytogenetic responses occurred in 37/50 patients who escalated the dose to 600 mg and in 10/20 patients who escalated to 800 mg daily (p=0.234). CMR was obtained in 10 patients: in 7 patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 3 patients who escalated imatinib for suboptimal cytogenetic response. Estimated 2 year-progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) is 87% and 85% respectively. Sixteen patients (21.6%) experienced toxicities and had temporarily IM interruption. Conclusions Imatinib dose escalation can induce sustained responses in a subset of patients with cytogenetic resistance and a prior suboptimal cytogenetic response to standard-dose imatinib, whereas it appears less effective in haematologic failure patients or in molecular sub-optimal responders. The availability of second generation TKI should be taken into account in these letter categories of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

BCR-ABL RNA Levels at the Time of a Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCR) Predict the Duration of CCR in Imatinib-Treated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1098-1098
Author(s):  
Richard D. Press ◽  
Zac Love ◽  
Ashlie A. Tronnes ◽  
Gwen Kurilik ◽  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Log P ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Complete Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Rna Levels

Abstract Background : Imatinib induces a complete cytogenetic response (CCR) in the majority of patients with chronic phase CML. CCR is durable in the majority of patients, but relapse occurs in a subset. To determine the potential of quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) of BCR-ABL to predict cytogenetic relapse, we serially monitored residual disease in 90 CML patients with an imatinib-induced CCR. Methods and patients : mRNA was prepared from total nucleated cells from blood or bone marrow, and cDNA was synthesized using random hexamer primers. Relative BCR-ABL expression was then measured by real-time fluorescent PCR normalized for G6PDH expression. This assay has a detection limit of 1 CML cell in 100,000 and an analytical precision of 6% (CV). At the start of imatinib therapy, 85% of patients were in chronic phase, at a median 9.5 months after diagnosis. Patients were treated with imatinib alone (64%) or in combination with interferon or cytarabine (32%). One patient each was treated with imatinib in combination with either the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib, donor leukocytes (after allogeneic BMT), or an experimental heat shock protein (hsp70) vaccine. During the imatinib follow-up time of 28 months (median), disease monitoring occurred by cytogenetics and qPCR (median 6 samples per patient). The CCR was achieved after 9.7 months (median) of imatinib therapy. Results : At the time of first achieving CCR, BCR-ABL RNA levels had decreased by a median of 1.8 logs below the median baseline level. During further follow-up, 26 patients (29%) experienced cytogenetic relapse (defined as any Ph-positive metaphase cell) at a median 6.0 months after CCR and a median 20 months after starting imatinib. There was no difference in the imatinib treatment time, the time to achieve CCR, or the post-CCR follow-up period between the patients with and without subsequent cytogenetic progression. qPCR data at the time of first CCR were available for 78 patients, including 25 of 26 with a subsequent cytogenetic relapse. The reduction of BCR-ABL RNA at the time of first achieving CCR was significantly less in those patients with a subsequent cytogenetic relapse (median 1.4 log) compared to those with a sustained CCR (median 2.0 log) (P=0.002). In the 64 patients with a sustained CCR, the molecular response progressively improved over time to reach a median reduction of 4.0 log at 15 months after CCR. Of the 29 patients achieving at least a 2 log reduction of BCR-ABL RNA at the time of first reaching CCR, only 3 (10%) had a subsequent cytogenetic relapse. In comparison, 22 of 49 patients (45%) with a less than 2 log reduction at the time of achieving CCR had a subsequent cytogenetic relapse (odds ratio = 7.1; 95% CI 1.9–26). At the time of first achieving CCR, a reduction in BCR-ABL RNA of less than 2 logs thus had a diagnostic sensitivity of 88% and a diagnostic specificity of 49% for predicting subsequent cytogenetic relapse. Conclusions : We conclude that, in the majority of imatinib-treated CML patients reaching CCR, the level of BCR-ABL RNA at the time that the CCR is first achieved is a sensitive predictor of the durability of the CCR. The availability of a laboratory marker capable of stratifying the subsequent risk of disease progression (early in remission) will be useful in targeting additional (or alternative) therapies to those patients with the highest risk.

Results of Imatinib Therapy In Patients with Early and Late Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In a South Brazilian Cohort.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4487-4487
Author(s):  
Marcelo Capra ◽  
Mariza Shaan ◽  
Katia Fassina ◽  
Mario Sérgio Fernandes ◽  
Marco Antônio Schilling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Sokal Score ◽  
Hasford Score

Abstract Abstract 4487 Background: Imatinib treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) was first introduced in Brazil in 2001, initially used as second line therapy for patients resistant or intolerant to interferon (IFN). In 2008 imatinib was adopted as front-line therapy for chronic-phase (CP-CML) and clinical experience is improving since then, but little is known about the result of its introduction in our clinical practice. Aims: To evaluate the impact of imatinib treatment in the outcomes of a cohort of CP-CML and the prognostic significance of Sokal and Hasford scores and late-onset treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients with CP-CML from a south Brazilian database. All patients received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the European LeukemiaNet. The outcomes were response to treatment, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: We analyzed data from 185 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (4 – 85). The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 months (0 – 178) and 29% of pts had more than 12 months lapse. Prior therapy with IFN was used in 70% pts. All pts had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. At baseline, 57 pts (31%) were in complete hematological response (CHR) due to the use of previous treatment. Of the 127 pts not in CHR at baseline, 98% achieved CHR early during imatinib treatment. 177 pts had cytogenetic evaluation during treatment and 9 pts were in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) due to the use of previous IFN. Of the 168 pts not in CCyR at baseline, 86,4% achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) during imatinib treatment (84% had a CCyR and 2,4% had a partial cytogenetic response). The rate of pts achieving MCyR any point during treatment differed significantly in the low, intermediate and high risk Sokal score groups (97%, 81% and 78% respectively, P=0,04), but not in the Hasford score groups (90%, 85% and 72%, P=0,22). Minor cytogenetic response was seen in 3,6% of pts, minimal cytogenetic response in 6% and 9,5% had no cytogenetic response. The median time to a MCyR was 9 months, with 62% of pts achieving MCyR at 12 months. The rate of pts achieving MCyR in 12 months differed significantly between pts who start imatinib before 12 months from diagnosis (68%) and those late treated (47%, P=0,02). Evaluation of minimal residual disease at the molecular level was available for 155 pts: 25,5% of pts had a complete molecular response (CMR), 43% had a major molecular response (MMR) and 2 pts were in MMR at baseline due to previous IFN. The projected EFS and OS rates at 4 years were, respectively, 68% and 92% after a median follow-up time of 4 years. The rate of EFS differed significantly in the low, intermediate and high risk Sokal score groups (80%, 66% and 52% respectively, P=0,04), but not in the Hasford score groups (78%, 62% and 44%, P=0,09). During treatment with imatinib, 120 pts (65%) had a register of any grade hematologic adverse event (21% being grades 3 or 4) and 165 pts (90%) had a register of any grade nonhematologic adverse event (9,3% being grades 3 or 4). Of the 185 pts who received treatment, 134 (72%) continue to receive imatinib and 51 (28%) discontinued treatment. The reasons for discontinuation were: 11 (6%) pts had drug-related adverse events (3 [1,6%] hematologic and 8 [4,3%] nonhematologic), 17 (9,2%) had disease progression (5 [2,7%] loss of CHR, 10 [5,4%] loss of CCyR, 2 [1%] had progression to accelerate or blastic phase), 22 (11,9%) had treatment failure (3 [1,6%] had no CHR, 13 [7%] had no CCyR and 6 [3,2%] had no MMR), 1 pt (0,5%) discontinued due to comorbidity. For the 51 (100%) pts that discontinued imatinib, 31 (61%) switched to dasatinib, 17 (33%) to nilotinib, 1 (2%) to hydroxyurea, 1 (2%) to other treatment and 1 (2%) remained without treatment. Sixteen pts (8,6%) died during imatinib treatment or during long-term follow-up after discontinuation of imatinib. Conclusions: In our population of CP-CML pts treated with imatinib, a majority of patients achieved complete cytogenetic and major molecular responses, with a prolonged of OS and EFS and good safety profile. Sokal score showed better prognosis prediction than Hasford. Early onset of imatinib therapy led to better outcomes and justifies imatinib as front-line treatment of our patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with Generic Imatinib in patients from Northeastern part of India

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3107-3113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Samrat ◽  
Lalit Prashant Meena ◽  
Jaya Chakravarty ◽  
Madhukar Rai
Keyword(s):  
Side Effect ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
One Year

Imatinib is now used as the first-line drug to treat CML patient. However, the emergence of resistance to Imatinib in CML patient, the side effect of bone marrow suppression, fluid overload and gastritis are a major limitation of the use of Imatinib in the treatment of CML. This study was conducted to see the therapeutic response and side effect profile of generic Imatinib Mesylate in newly diagnosed CML patients. All cases of CML were given generic Imatinib and followed prospectively with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. They were followed at an interval of 2 weeks till complete hematologic response, thereafter at an interval of 6 to 8 weeks. Cytogenetic and molecular response at the end of one year also evaluated. Among 36 CML patients, 33 were in chronic phase 2 in accelerated phase and 1 in blast crisis while 35 were Philadelphia+ve and 1 was ph–ve at initial presentation. Minimum duration to achieve CHR was 2 week with a mean of 5 weeks. At 3 month except one 35 patients achieved CHR (97%). Out of 36 patients, 27 were subjected for Philadelphia chromosome at one year which shown 23 patients (85.18%) achieved a major cytogenetic response. 8 (38%) patients achieved a major molecular response and one patient (4.76%) was having a complete molecular response at one year. 8 (22.22%) patients developed hematological toxicity to Imatinib with Pancytopenia most common. In conclusion, Generic Imatinib is having an excellent therapeutic response in CML patients although higher response rate may be due to smaller sample size and lesser duration of follow up.

Imatinib In Very Elderly CML Patients: What Can We Achieve?.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1229-1229
Author(s):  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Dario Ferrero ◽  
Francesco Cavazzini ◽  
Malgorzata Monika Trawinska ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Initial Dosage ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Early Toxicity

Abstract Abstract 1229 In the “real world” of clinical practice, many very elderly CML patients have been treated with imatinib (IM), but there are few data on the results and the best initial dosage in such patients. To highlight peculiar aspects of toxicity and efficacy of IM in this subset which accounts for at least 10–15% of all CML cases, we retrospectively revised 156 CML patients in chronic phase treated with IM when aged > 75 years from 23 haematological Institutions in Italy; there were 85 males and 71 females, median age at IM start was 78.4 years (IR 76.1 – 81.4), Sokal Risk at diagnosis was low in 2 patients, intermediate in 90, high in 50 and not evaluable in 14. One or more concomitant diseases requiring specific treatments were present in 144/156 patients (92.3%), with 94 patients (60.2%) assuming 3 or more concomitant drugs. Thirty patients (19.2%) were in late chronic phase (≥ 12 months from diagnosis) and pretreated (25 with HU and 5 with IFN) before starting IM; on the whole, median time from diagnosis to IM was 1.2 months (IR 0.5 – 3.6). Starting dose of IM was 400 mg/day in 117 patients (75.0%) and 300 mg/day or less in 39 patients (25.0%); overall, 59 patients (37.8%) (52/117 at 400 mg starting dose and 7/39 at 3 300 mg starting dose) needed a dose reduction and 18 (11.5%) discontinued IM for toxicity (early toxicity in 13 and late toxicity in 5). Excluding the 13 patients who discontinued IM due to early toxicity, maximum tolerated daily dose during treatment was 400 mg in 63 patients, 300 mg in 51 patients and < 300 mg in 29 patients. According to CTC-AE, grade 3 – 4 hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were observed in 34 (21.7%) and 34 (21.7%) patients, respectively; 5 patients (3.2%) presented a pleural effusion during IM treatment. After a median treatment period of 29.4 months (IR 7.9 – 54.4), 8 patients (5.1%) are still too early (< 6 months of treatment), 13 (8.3%) discontinued IM due to early toxicity, 3 (1.9%) were resistant and 1 (0.7%) died from unrelated cause early after IM initiation: the remaining 131 patients (84.6%) achieved a complete haematological response (CHR). Among these 131 patients in CHR, 11 refused any other karyotipic or molecular evaluation (1 lost CHR and shifted to hydroxyurea, 4 are still alive in CHR, 6 died in CHR from unrelated causes), 17 achieved CHR only and 103 (66.0% of all 156 patients) achieved a cytogenetic response (CyR), which was major in 11 patients and complete (CCyR) in 92 (58.9% of all 156 patients). In addition, among the 92 patients in CCyR, 62 (39.7% of all 156 patients) achieved a molecular response (major molecular response in 40 patients and complete molecular response with an undetectable BCR/ABL hybrid gene at qualitative nested PCR in 22 patients). After a median follow-up of 34.0 months (IR 12.9 – 60.0), 36 patients have died (5 from disease progression and 31 from unrelated causes), 4 patients were lost to follow-up and 116 are still alive: 2-year and 4-year overall survival were 90.2% (CI95% 84.8 – 95.6) and 76.8% (CI95% 68.6 – 85.0), respectively. In conclusion, results from this large unselected cohort of patients show that should be definitely considered unethical to avoid IM therapy to any elderly patient; no upper age limit should be given but also very elderly (and with concomitant severe diseases) patients should have this chance of cure. The role of a reduced starting dose of IM warrants further studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prognostic Significance of the Lost of a Major Molecular Response In Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Ph+CML).

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3435-3435
Author(s):  
J. Valentin García-Gutiérrez ◽  
Pilar Herrera ◽  
Marta Jimenez-Rolando ◽  
María Tenorio ◽  
María Calbacho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 3435 Background: Albeit of well-known, dramatic improvements, there remain some questions to be solved around Ph+CML in treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Among these, the significance of the amount of minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by RT-PCR. For instance, loss of a so-called major molecular response (MMR) is claimed to be a Òsuboptimal responseÓ and following the ELN recommendations, a change in treatment should be considered in these patients. Aims: To evaluate the relevance of a loss of MMR in patients with complete cytogenetic response (CCR). Study Group and Methods: We have analized 81 patients treated with imatinib for CML in chronic phase with a median follow up of 66 months. 36 patients started imatinib after interferon failure and 45 as front line therapy. Major Molecular Response (MMR; BCR-ABL/ABL ratio<0.1% IS) at any time was achieved by 63 patients. Results: 22 patients (34%) lost MMR (documented al least twice). The risk of losing MMR was higher in late MMR (>18 months) compared with those cases whose MMR came much earlier (<18 months): 70% vs 18% (p=. 000). We have found no correlation among the lost of MMR and classical prognostic factors (Sokal-Index, mutations at the TK domain or imatinib plasma levels). Of these 22 patients, 7 (32 %) recovered MMR later with no therapy changes, 8 (36%) experienced fluctuations in the BCR-ABL transcript-levels without losing CCR, 4 (19%) did not attain a MMR but remained in stable CRR, and 3 (13%) lost CCR. These regained MMR after being treated on second generation TKI. The results show how the stability of the early MMR is greater than late MMR (table1). Conclusions: In our experience, one third of the patients who lost MMR recovered it later on the same treatment. And only 13% went on to treatment failure. Perhaps some similar cases (after first losing MMR) should be closely monitored before a change in treatment. Also of note is, of course regarding only our experience, that the risk of a loss of MMR seems to be maximal in patients who achieve a late MMR. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

CD117 (c-kit) Expression On CD34+ Cells Participates In The Cytogenetic Response To Imatinib In CML Patients In First Chronic Phase

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3990-3990
Author(s):  
Jaroslaw Dybko ◽  
Ewa Medras ◽  
Olga Haus ◽  
Bozena Jazwiec ◽  
Joanna Urbaniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Level ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Annexin V ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Background Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) biology seemed to be perfectly explored especially at the beginning of tyrosine kinase inhibitors era (TKI). Later years with imatinib and second generation TKI showed variety of resistance mechanisms and it became obvious bcr-abl chimeric gene is not the only enemy to fight. Some studies assumed the decreased rate of programmed cell death (apoptotic) to be the primary mechanism by which BCR-ABL effects expansion of the leukemic clone in CML. Other studies showed the important role of patients adherence in achieving best possible response for imatinib. Imatinib plasma level was recognized as a useful tool for adherence evaluation. In this study we evaluate the expression of apoptotic marker, Annexin V in CD34+CD117+ cells of CML patients in first chronic phase treated with imatinib and try to find the correlation between this expression and cytogenetic response or imatinib plasma level. Patients The group of 54 CML patients (F/M = 30/24, median age, 50.5) in first chronic phase treated with imatinib (400 mg daily) was analyzed. The median time of treatment was 17 months (min. 12 months, max. 24 months. Only patients with the conventional translocation (Philadelphia chromosome) without additional chromosomal aberrations or clonal evolution during the treatment period were included in the study. Patients were categorized according to ELN criteria for cytogenetic response: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) vs. no cytogenetic response (NCyR, defined as everything less than CCyR), and for molecular response: major molecular response (MMR) vs. no molecular response (NMR). Results In the cohort of 54 patients, 39 achieved CCyR in a median time of 12 months. Among these patients, 30 achieved MMR within the same time. Bone marrow CD34 positive cells were assessed for expression of CD117 and Annexin V in all groups of patients (CCyR with MMR, CCyR with NMR, and NCyR). The mean percentage of CD34+CD117+ cells was significantly higher in the NCyR group (7.67±5.62) in comparison with the CCyR group (2.27±1,78; p=0.002). The difference between MMR and NMR subgroups was not significant. While analyzing the CD34+CD117+ population, we found a significantly higher percentage of apoptotic cells (Annexin V positive) in the CCyR group (4.65±4.55) than in the NCyR group (1.67±1.22; p=0.004). Once again this difference was not significant between MMR and NMR subgroups. Serum imatinib levels were quantified in both CCyR and NCyR groups. We found higher values in the CCyR group (1244 μg/l±599) than in the NCyR group (1192 μg/l±593) but this difference was insignificant. Conclusions It was recently reported that c-kit must be inhibited to allow apoptosis of CML cells. Our results also correspond with these data. Not only was a lower percentage of CD34+CD117+ cells found in the CCyR group, but the fraction of these cells that were apoptotic was significantly greater compared with the NCyR group. Although other studies have indicated that trough plasma concentration of imatinib reflects clinical response in chronic phase of CML, we did not observe this. Our results showed higher imatinib levels in CCyR, but these data were insignificant. In conclusion, our results indicate that to achieve optimal treatment response in CML patients, c-kit kinase inhibition may be a requirement for successful proapoptotic activity of imatinib. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Imatinib Mesylate Induces High Complete Cytogenetic and Molecular Response Rates in Children and Adolescents with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase (CP)

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4273-4273
Author(s):  
Fiorina Giona ◽  
Maria Caterina Putti ◽  
Maria Luisa Moleti ◽  
Mauro Nanni ◽  
Anna Maria Testi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Real Time Quantitative Pcr

Abstract Imatinib mesylate (IM), a BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is an effective therapy for CML in adults and has shown efficacy in children with Ph+ leukemias. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IM in Ph+ CML patients (pts) in CP aged &lt;18 years at diagnosis, previously untreated or resistant to Interferon (IFN). In all pts, IM therapy, started at a dose of 340 mg/m2/day, was modulated according to the hematologic parameters. Cytogenetic studies were performed on bone marrow (BM) cells at baseline and, during IM therapy, every 3 months (mo). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was also confirmed by FISH. BCR-ABL transcripts were measured in the peripheral blood (PB) cells every mo and in the BM cells every 3 mo by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). Molecular response (MolR) was defined as major in the presence of a BCRABL: ABL ratio &lt;0.05% and as complete with a ratio &lt;0.001. Between February 2001 and October 2007, 13 Ph+ CML pts (9 M and 4 F; median age 128/12 years) in CP were recruited from 2 pediatric centers (Rome and Padua). Eight of the 13 pts (7 M and 1 F; median age 11 years) received IM at diagnosis and 5 (3 F and 1 M; median age 146/12 years) after IFN therapy given at a mean dose of 6.000.000 UI/day for a median of 18 mo. All but 1 pt tolerated well IM treatment. The mean dose of IM administered was 326 mg/m2/day for untreated pts and 227 mg/m2/day for those resistant to IFN. The characteristics and followup of the pts are summarized in the Table: Sex/Age at diagn/Age at treat (yrs) IFN duration/%Ph+ IM mg/m2/day CCyR/time (mo) Max Bcr-Abl:Abl (%)/time (mo) (BM) Max Bcr-Abl:Abl (%)/time (mo) (PB) CCyR duration (mo) Follow-up .F/11/146/12 40 mo/100 193.5 4 0/60 0/4 +80 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%)BM 0 PB 0.0023 F/179/12/1810/12 9 mo/100 182 6 1.27/9 0.89/9 +7 Lost to follow-up in CCyR at + 13 mo M/91/12/117/12 26 mo/50 208 3 0/36 0/12 +65 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%)BM 0 PB 0 F/89/12/910/12 13 mo/50 350 3 0/44 0/66 +66 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%)BM 0.009 PB 0 M/172/12/189/12 18 mo/80 205 9 0.029/68 0.114/72 +82 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%)BM 0.05 PB 0.15 M/126/12 −/100 310 4 0/42 0/30 +66 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%): BM 0 PB 0 M/161/12 −/100 327 n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. IM tox; alive CCyR after SCT (sibl) (+40 mo) M/144/12 −/100 291 4 0/42 0/24 +61 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%) BM 0 PB 0 M/811/12 −/100 357.5 6 0.044/9 0.057/9 CyRel/33 Alive CCyR after SCT (+ 8 mo) M/95/12 −/100 326 3 0.013/12 0.028/9 +12 Alive CCyR,Bcr-Abl:Abl (%) BM 0.013 PB 0.15 M/410/12 −/100 328.5 3 0.02/9 0/12 BMT/+13 SCT (sibl) in CCyR-&gt;Alive in CCyR +43 mo M/137/12 −/100 349 6 0.012/30 0.025/30 +32 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%) BM 0.012 PB 0.025 F/94/12 −/100 320 3 0.009/9 0.003/9 +7 Alive CCyR, Bcr-Abl:Abl (%) BM 0.02 PB 0.003 Twelve of the 13 pts (92%) achieved a CCyR after a median of 4 mo (range 3–9). Eleven of the latter 12 pts were evaluated for MolR: 11/11 (100%) pts achieved a MolR, 6 major (54.5%) and 5 complete (45.5%), on BM cells after a median of 36 mo (range 9–68) and 9/11 pts (82%) on PB cells, 4 major (44.4%) and 5 complete (55.6%), after a median of 12 mo (range 4–66). To date, 12 evaluable pts are alive in CCyR: 3 after a stem cell transplantation (SCT) and 9 still receiving IM for a median time of 68 mo (range 10–89). MolR persists on BM cells in 9/9 pts (100%), 4 complete (44%), and on PB cells in 7/9 pts (78%), 4 complete. Our experience indicates that IM is highly effective in children and adolescents with Ph+ CML in CP, capable also of inducing high and persistent CCyR and MolR rates also in pts resistant to IFN.

Does pre-imatinib (IM) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) predict myelosuppression and outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)?

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7071-7071
Author(s):  
L. Lima ◽  
S. E. Assouline ◽  
D. Saxe ◽  
K. Mann ◽  
M. McLemore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Selective Inhibition ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Resistant Disease ◽  
Advanced Phase

7071 Background: IM-associated myelosuppression occurs in 4–40% of CML patients (pts) vs. 1–16% in GIST. Selective inhibition of predominantly Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) driven hematopoiesis may explain development of myelosuppression. In the absence of clinically applicable methods to quantitate Ph+/Ph- progenitor ratio, we hypothesized that the pre-IM percentage of BCR-ABL+ cells measured by FISH predicts myelosuppression. Methods: FISH pre-IM was available in 58 CML pts with chronic phase (CP, n=52), or advanced phase (AP, accelerated =3, blast =3) at 2 institutions. Grade >3 myelosuppression occurred < 60 days from starting IM in 9 pts (400 mg/d=6, > 600 mg/d=3), leading to dose reduction (4), discontinuation (1) or continuation same dose IM despite myelosuppression (4). Cryopreserved marrow CD34+/CD38- cells from 14 pts with (7) or without (7) post-IM myelosuppression were sorted using flow cytometry and subjected to FISH analyses. Results: Median FISH was higher for myelosuppression (90%) vs. no myelosuppression (80%) pts (p= 0.03), and in AP vs. CP (97 % vs. 80%, p=0.003). Results of FISH on CD34+/CD38- cells will be reported. Table summarizes outcomes of CP pts. Median follow-up was 14 and 45 months for myelosuppression and no myelosuppression AP pts, respectively. Myelosuppression AP pts expired (CML=2, GVHD=1); 1 after complete hematologic (CHR) and minor cytogenetic response (CTGR), 1 after partial HR, and 1 resistant disease. All 3 pts without myelosuppression achieved CHR with major CTGR, and 2 had partial molecular response. 1 died from GVHD. Conclusions: Higher FISH pre-IM identifies a group of CML pts who develop myelosuppression and are less likely to respond to IM. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document