Vincristine Sulfate Liposomes Injection (Marqibo®) Facilitates Durable Remissions and Potentially Curative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adults with Advanced, Relapsed and/or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4235-4235
Author(s):  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
John Lister ◽  
Leonard T. Heffner ◽  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Lloyd E. Damon ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4235 A durable response in advanced, relapsed and/or refractory adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be defined as remission that results in a meaningful prolongation of life or response that facilitates “bridging” to a subsequent, potentially curative, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Vincristine sulfate liposomes injection (VSLI, Marqibo®) is a sphingomyelin/cholesterol (SM/Chol) nanoparticle formulation of standard vincristine sulfate (VCR) designed to facilitate dose intensification, prolonged drug delivery and enhanced lymphoid malignancy penetration and concentration without increased toxicity. Recently, VSLI was evaluated in a multi-institutional, Phase 1/2 (VSLI-06; NCT00144963) clinical trial and a multi-national, Phase 2 (HBS407; NCT00495079) clinical trial in a combined 101 adults (median age 31 years [range 18 to 83 years]) with advanced, relapsed and/or refractory ALL. All but 1 patient had Philadelphia chromosome negative disease. Thirteen patients (13%) had extramedullary disease, 37 (37%) had undergone a prior HSCT, and 100% had received at least one prior line of therapy including standard VCR. Study VSLI-06 (N = 36) was a dose-ascending trial of weekly VSLI (1.5 to 2.4 mg/m2) combined with pulse dexamethasone. Study HBS407 was a single-arm trial of weekly single-agent VSLI at the maximum tolerated dose established in VSLI-06 of 2.25 mg/m2. Overall, 19 (19%) patients received VSLI as a first salvage therapy, 57 (56%) patients received VSLI as a second salvage therapy, and 25 (25%) patients received VSLI as a third or greater salvage therapy. All patients had to be deemed ineligible for immediate HSCT in order to enroll in VSLI-06 or HBS407. In the combined study population, the overall response rate (complete remission [CR], CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi], partial remission [PR], and bone marrow blast response [BMB]) was 31% (95% CI: 22–41) with a 20% (95% CI: 13–29) rate of CR+CRi. Despite delivering intensified individual (2.8–5.5 mg) and cumulative (up to 70.1 mg) doses of VCR, VSLI had a similar safety profile to that reported for the approved dose of standard VCR. VSLI enabled bridging to a post-VSLI HSCT in 12 of 65 (18%) patients in HBS407 and 5 of 36 (14%) patients in VSLI06 for a total of 17 of 101 (17%). All 17 post-VSLI HSCT patients were under the age of 60 years. Three of 12 post-VSLI HSCT patients from HBS407 remain alive at greater than 28, 33, and 35 months following VSLI, respectively. All 12 patients lived for greater than 100 days after post-VSLI HSCT. Long-term survival (greater than 12 months) was achieved in 27% of those able to receive post-VSLI HSCT. These outcomes, that are important to patients, may reflect the effectiveness of the VCR dose intensification facilitated by VSLI. The neuropathy associated with the dose intensified VCR administered as VSLI was predictable, manageable, and comparable to that published for standard VCR. The lack of early, pre-day 100, mortality following post-VSLI HSCT suggests that the sphingomyelin-based liposomal formulation did not adversely affect subsequent transplantation procedures. In conclusion, VSLI produced both clinically important endpoints of prolonged survival and achievement of response allowing for a bridge to HSCT for advanced, relapsed and/or refractory ALL. Disclosures: Schiller: Talon Therapeutics: Research Funding. Silverman:Talon Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Deitcher:Talon Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 861-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Selwyn Stein ◽  
Max S. Topp ◽  
Hagop M Kantarjian ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Ralf C Bargou ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Current therapies for patients with r/r ALL who have had prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have very poor outcomes. Improvements in the therapeutic options available for adult r/r ALL are required. Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that redirects cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19-positive B cells. The aim of the present analysis was to characterize a subset of patients with r/r ALL and prior alloHSCT before treatment with blinatumomab from a large confirmatory open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 study (Topp MS et al Lancet Oncol 2015;16(1):57-66). Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years) had Philadelphia chromosome-negative r/r ALL with 1 of the following negative prognostic factors: primary refractory, first relapse within 12 months of first remission, relapse within 12 months of alloHSCT, or second or greater salvage. Patients with active acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were excluded. Patients were required to stop all immunosuppressive GvHD therapy within 2 weeks before starting blinatumomab. A total of 189 patients were enrolled and received blinatumomab by continuous intravenous infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles. The primary endpoint was complete remission or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) within the first 2 cycles. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and adverse events (AEs). Results: 64 (34%) patients had received alloHSCT before study enrollment; 10 patients had 2 prior alloHSCTs. Donor types primarily included 29 (45%) matched sibling and 31 (48%) unrelated, with 34 (59%) patients receiving myeloablative conditioning regimens (donor chimerism data were unavailable). Among those with prior alloHSCT, median age (range) was 32 (19-74) years. At baseline, 23 (36%) patients had 1 prior relapse, 24 (38%) had 2 prior relapses, and 17 (27%) had ≥3 prior relapses; 28 (44%) patients had relapsed post-alloHSCT. Of the 55 patients who had received previous salvage therapy, 38 (69%) had received salvage therapy after last alloHSCT and prior to blinatumomab. Median time (range) between the last alloHSCT and subsequent relapse was 6 (1-33) months. Median time from last prior alloHSCT to first dose of blinatumomab was 10 (3-40) months. Nineteen (30%) patients had a history of GvHD, and 42 (66%) had ≥50% bone marrow blasts at start of treatment as assessed by a central laboratory. Patients received blinatumomab for a median of 2 (1-5) cycles. Efficacy data are presented in Table 1. Overall, 45% (29/64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33-58) of patients achieved CR/CRh within the first 2 cycles, with similar rates of remission also observed in the alloHSCT-naïve (42%; 52/125) group. With a median follow-up of 8.8 months, median (95% CI) OS was 8.4 (4.2-9.4) months for the 64 patients with prior alloHSCT treated with blinatumomab. Of the 29 responders (CR, n=18 and CRh, n=11), 22 (76%) had a minimal residual disease (MRD) response and 19 (66%) achieved a complete MRD response. Median RFS (95% CI) was 6.1 (5.0-7.7) months. 9/29 (31%) responders subsequently underwent another alloHSCT. In total, 56 (88%) patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs, with the most frequent including neutropenia (22%), febrile neutropenia (20%), anemia (17%), and thrombocytopenia (14%). Six patients reported treatment-emergent GvHD (two grade ≥ 3) during blinatumomab treatment, 3 of whom had GvHD in skin. Eight patients had fatal treatment-emergent AEs, which included 1 due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 1 due to respiratory failure, and 6 due to infection/infestation; 1 of these (candida infection) was considered to be possibly related to treatment by the investigator. Of the subjects who had treatment-emergent fatal AEs, none were in remission at the time of death. Summary: In this heavily pretreated group of patients with r/r ALL and prior alloHSCT, single-agent blinatumomab was able to induce a CR/CRh rate of 45%, with an AE profile consistent with that previously reported. Post-alloHSCT patients who had relapsed performed equally as well as those without prior alloHSCT. To prolong remission in this poor outcome patient group, the addition of other immunotherapies to the treatment regimen may be considered for future investigations. Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Topp:Astra: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Goekbuget:Erytech: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Equity Ownership; Sanofi: Equity Ownership; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eusapharma/Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bargou:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Patent for blinatumomab; University of Wuerzburg, Germany: Employment; GEMoaB GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rambaldi:Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria. Zhang:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zimmerman:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forman:Mustang: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3102-3102
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Kaci Wilhelm ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Marcos De Lima ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3102 No highly effective salvage therapy exists for patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) is a CD22 monoclonal antibody attached to calicheamycin and targets B lymphocytes in early stages of development. A 56% overall response rate was noted in a Phase I study of single agent IO in patients with refractory ALL (Jabbour ASCO 2011), enabling subsequent transplant in remission in a relatively large number of patients. Of note, in the year prior to the availability of IO, we consulted on 13 patients will ALL beyond second remission and transplanted 5 (38%), and after the availability of IO, we consulted on 41 patients and transplanted 27 (67%). Methods: We describe our findings in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following treatment with IO between June 2010 and May 2011. IO was administered at 1.8 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks. Results: 19 patients with median age 32 years (range 5–60) received an allogeneic matched sibling (n=6), matched unrelated donor (n=8), mismatched unrelated donor (n=4), or cord blood HSCT (n=1) in complete remission (CR) (n=2), CR without platelet recovery (n=14), and active disease (n=3); 10 patients were MRD negative at time of HSCT as determined by multiparameter flow cytometry. Patients had received 2 (n=3), 3 (n=9), 4 (n=4), 5 (n=2), or 6 (n=1) lines of salvage therapy prior to HSCT, including 3 patients who had received a prior allogeneic HSCT; IO was the last agent in 17 patients (2 patients refractory to IO received other therapy prior to HSCT). Patients received 1 (n=1), 2 (n=9), 3 (n=6), 4 (n=2), or 5 (n=1) courses of IO a median of 35 days (range 18–69) prior to transplant conditioning with busulfan (Bu) and colafarabine (Clo) (n=8), BuClo+ thiotepa (TT) (n=4), fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) (n=1), FluMelTT (n=3), or etoposide and total body irradiation (TBI) (n=3); GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus-based for all patients, with post-HSCT cyclophosphamide added for patients receiving mismatched unrelated donors. With a median follow-up of 3 months among surviving patients (0.6–8.2), overall and progression-free survival is 59% at 3 months. There were 11 deaths, 6 from relapse, 4 from multi-organ failure involving VOD, and 1 from pneumonia. Transient liver enzyme elevations were noted in all of the patients, with 26% (n=5) patients developing VOD. The development of VOD was associated with greater lines of prior therapy prior to HSCT (3–5 lines prior salvage therapy, including 2 patients who had a prior allo-HSCT) and more intense transplant conditioning regimens (4 of the 5 patients received BuCloTT or FluMelTT). Conclusions: IO is an effective salvage therapy in patients with advanced ALL, allowing more patients to receive HSCT with encouraging response rates. Longer follow-up is needed to more completely assess disease control. Using reduced intensity HSCT conditioning regimens and avoiding multiple lines of prior therapies may result in less hepatic toxicity. Disclosures: O'Brien: Pfizer: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document