Salvage Treatment with Ofatumumab and ESHAP (O-ESHAP) for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma After First-Line Chemotherapy: Interim Analysis of a Phase II Trial of the Spanish Group of Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplantation (GELTAMO)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1630-1630
Author(s):  
Carmen Martinez ◽  
Mercedes Rodriguez-Calvillo ◽  
María José Terol ◽  
Blanca Xicoy ◽  
Ramón García-Sanz ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1630 The management of recurrent or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) remains challenging. Previous published data have suggested that infiltrating normal B lymphocytes in classic HL lesions may contribute to the survival of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells in vivo. The objective of this prospective, multicenter, phase II trial was to investigate the activity of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, ofatumumab, in combination to a standard platinum-based salvage regimen, ESHAP (O-ESHAP) followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with classical HL failing to first line chemotherapy. Forty- five patients (25 M / 21 F, median age 34 years, range 18–66) were enrolled in the study between June 2010 and June 2012. Treatment consisted on three cycles of ESHAP plus ofatumumab 1,000 mg days 1 and 8 on first cycle and day 1 on second and third cycles. At the time of study entry, 66% of patients had III-IV Ann Arbor stage, 16% bulky disease, 18% B symptoms, 40% extranodal HL and 52% ≥3 involved nodal areas. We respect to response to first-line therapy, 46% patients had achieved a completed response (CR) and then relapsed, 6% had a partial remission (PR), whereas the remaining 48% were primary refractory. Eighty-one percent patients have received 3 cycles of O-ESHAP as scheduled, three patients 2, and five 1 cycle (1 patient due to toxicity, 1 patient's decision, 2 HL progression, and 4 treatments ongoing). Grade 3–4 WHO hematological toxicity was observed in 16%, 19%, and 20% after cycles 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity was reported in 32%, 10%, and 20%, respectively. Overall response (OR) rate was 63% (49% CR and 14% PR). Response to O-ESHAP according to prior response to first-line chemotherapy is shown in table 1. Adequate PBSCs collection was achieved in 94% mobilized patients. Twenty-six out of 33 patients have already proceeded to ASCT. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis after ASCT and HL progression, respectively. Preliminary results of this ongoing trial suggest that addition of ofatumumab to ESHAP is safe and has a promising clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory HL candidates to ASCT. Table 1. Response to O-ESHAP according to previous response to first-line treatment Response to first-line chemotherapy Relapsed or partial response (n=17) Refractory (n=16) Response after O-ESHAP OR 16 (94%) 7 (44%) CR 14 (82%) 3 (22%) PR 2 (12%) 4 (22%) Refractory 1 (6%) 9 (56%) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
Sharlene Litchy ◽  
M. Ray Lamb ◽  
Gladys I. Rodriguez ◽  
Jr. Carroll Scroggin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4139-4139
Author(s):  
Chris Poki Leung ◽  
Minal A. Barve ◽  
Ming-Shiang Wu ◽  
Kathleen F. Pirollo ◽  
James F. Strauss ◽  
...  

4139 Background: Nearly all stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients progress after first-line treatment, and second-line options are limited. SGT-53 is an investigational product for tumor-targeted TP53 gene therapy that has completed phase Ia/Ib trials [Senser et al (2013), Mol Ther 21:1096; Pirollo et al (2016) Mol Ther 24:1697]. Methods: Here we provide an interim analysis of a Phase II trial (SGT53-02-1; NCT02340117) combining SGT-53 with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEM/ABX). Eligible were first-line patients or those who had progressed after FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and/or gemcitabine-based therapy (second-line). In a 7-week treatment cycle, SGT-53 (3.6 mg DNA) was given once or twice weekly with GEM/ABX (1000 mg/m2/wk and 125 mg/m2/wk, respectively, for 3 of 4 weeks). Progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) are primary endpoints.Overall survival (OS) and PFS are estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Of all evaluable patients (n=20), best response in 7 patients was determined to be partial response (PR) and 13 had stable disease (SD); none had progressive disease. In the second-line patients (n=11) there were 5 PR and 6 SD after 9 had failed FFX treatment, 3 had failed gemcitabine-based treatment and 1 had failed both. For patients with elevated CA19-9, SGT-53 + GEM/ABX resulted in marked reductions in the tumor marker. Published data for patients with PAC after therapy failure [Mita et al (2019) J Clin Med 8: 761; Portal et al (2015) Br J Cancer 113:989; Wang-Gillam et al (2016) Lancet 387:545] are shown for comparison. Notably, mPFS in our second-line patients was 7.4 months versus 3.1 months for the approved second-line therapy [Wang-Gillam et al (2016)]. This improvement in PFS exceeds the benchmark proposed to predict a clinically meaningful Phase III trial [Rahib et al (2016) Lancet Oncol 2:1209]. Conclusions: Our data suggest a clinically meaningful benefit of adding SGT-53 to GEM/ABX particularly for second-line PAC patients, most of whom had failed prior FFX treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT02340117. [Table: see text]


2022 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
T. I. Bogatyreva ◽  
A. O. Afanasov ◽  
A. Yu. Terekhova ◽  
N. A. Falaleeva

Rationale. In the early stages of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL), the cure rate reaches 85–95 %, but the long-term effects of therapy can worsen overall survival. Current trials for early stages of Hodgkin’s lymphoma with favorable prognosis address the task of maintaining cure rates while reducing sequelae. For early unfavorable stages, the challenge is to improve cure rate without increasing toxicity.Purpose. To assess the potential significance of individual risk factors for optimal choice of the first line chemotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.Materials and methods. This single-center retrospective study included 290 patients with early stage cHL who had received ABVD – based (n = 249; 86 %) or BEACOPP‑21 – based (n = 41; 14 %) combined modality therapy from 2000 to 2017. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed in Cox regression analysis including 12 clinical parameters.Main results. At a median follow up of 60 months for the entire group, OS was 95 % and PFS was 89 %. In a multivariate analysis PFS, at 5 years, was significantly inferior in patients with mediastinal bulk, baseline lymphocytopenia (≤ 0.6 × 109/L, р = 0.002; < 1.0 × 109/L, р = 0.000) and male gender; OS was inferior only in patients with an absolute lymphocytopenia (AL). In patients with AL, PFS after ABVD-based regimen was, respectively, 12 % in the high-risk group with mediastinal bulk and 56 % without it. PFS of patients without AL when treated with ABVD did not differ compared to BEACOPP‑21 within the same prognostic group: 95.2 % vs. 92.3 % for non-bulky and 86.4 % vs. 84.2 % for bulky disease. In the absence of AL, mediastinal bulk remained the main and only risk factor in multivariate analysis.Conclusions. The ABVD regimen is highly effective in the first line of chemotherapy for cHL, except for cases with baseline lymphocytopenia, in which the early usage of the BEACOPP regimen in the escalated or 14-day variants might be justified. In patients with mediastinal bulk, standard chemotherapy is not effective enough even in the absence of AL; therefore, if an intermediate PET/CT scan is available, it seems more appropriate to use a milder ABVD regimen on the first line and leave intensive therapy for patients with proven refractory disease. Prospects for improving the efficiency are opened with the new N-AVD and A-AVD schemes, the benefits of which should be evaluated, first of all, in patients with AL and mediastinal bulk.


2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-290
Author(s):  
Jean‐Marie Michot ◽  
Maxime Annereau ◽  
Alina Danu ◽  
Clémence Legoupil ◽  
Louis Bertin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document