A Phase I/II Study of Bendamustine, Low-Dose Dexamethasone, and Lenalidomide (BdL) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1851-1851
Author(s):  
Stefano Sacchi ◽  
Samantha Pozzi ◽  
Stefania Badiali ◽  
Attilio Guarini ◽  
Carla Mazzone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1851 Background: Bendamustine, an agent sharing properties of alkylators and purine analogous, showed a strong efficacy and safe toxicity profile in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with a maximally tolerated dose (MTD) ranging from 100 mg/m2/die day 1 and 2 as single agent to 60 mg/m2/die in association with thalidomide. In a pooled analysis of two large phase 3 trials Lenalidomide, an analogous of thalidomide with strong activities in MM, significantly improved overall response rate and progression-free survival. Since the role of Lenalidomide in the treatment of naïve and relapsed/refractory pts has been well established, the current research is focused on the combination of Lenalidomide with chemotherapy to further improve patient outcome. Methods: This multicenter phase I/II trial was designed to investigate the combination of Bendamustine, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (BdL) in repeating 4-week cycles as treatment for relapsed MM. Pts over 18 years with measurable stage II or III MM who relapsed after 1 to 3 previous lines of therapy, including bone marrow transplantation were considered eligible. Prior Lenalidomide and Bortezomib were allowed. The phase I study was conducted using a 3+3 cohort design beginning at a dose level 0 of intravenous Bendamustine 40 mg/m2/die days 1 and 2, oral Lenalidomide 10 mg/die days 1–21 and oral Dexamethasone 40 mg/die days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (28-day cycle). The dose of Bendamustine and Lenalidomide (from 0 to 5) were increased from one cohort to the next, in a 3+3 dose escalation scheme to reach the MTD (Table 1). The MTD of Bendamustine and Lenalidomide were evaluated during the first treatment course (cycle 1). Enrollment at each subsequent dose level was permitted only if the first 3 patients at the previous level received 1 cycle with an acceptable dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLTs were defined as any adverse event (AE) possibly related to the study drug ≥grade 3 CTC. If 1 of the 3 subjects experienced DLT during the first cycle, 3 more subjects were to be recruited and treated at the same dose level of Bendamustine and Lenalidomide. Treatment was given until plateau of best response according to the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: Herein, we present the results from phase I of the study which established MTD. Fifteen pts with a median age of 69 years (range 49 to 88) were enrolled between October 2011 and February 2012. The number of prior therapies was at maximum 3 as per protocol: Lenalidomide (27% of pts), thalidomide (33% of pts), Bortezomib (67% of pts) and 13% of the pts had a prior autologous stem cell transplant. Because 3 DTL were observed in Phase I, the MTD was set at 40 mg/m2/die for Bendamustine and 10 mg/die for Lenalidomide. DLTs at dose level 1 included: 1 grade 4 cutaneous rash; at dose level 2: 1 grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 1 grade 3 bronchopneumonia with renal dysfunction (Table 2). Among the 15 patients with evaluable data, the grade 3 or 4 AEs observed in ≥10% of patients included neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (13%) and anemia (20%). Two patients died of treatment-related complications: 1 for hematological toxicity and CNS hemorrhage, and 1 for cardiac ischemia. Fifteen patients received at least 2 cycles and were included in the response assessment. The overall response rate was 40% with 1 case achieving complete response and 1 a very good partial response. Until now 7 pts entered the phase II part of the trial. Conclusions: In pretreated patients with relapsed MM, MTD was determined to be Bendamustine 40 mg/m2/die on days 1 and 2, and Lenalidomide 10 mg/m2/die on days 1–21, plus Dexametasone 40 mg/die on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This BdL schedule was relatively tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Based on the mainly myelosuppressive properties, concomitant treatment with growth factors are recommended for all patients. The toxicity profile of BdL scheme resulted in an acceptable treatment-related toxicity and mortality and induced a good quality responses in a pretreated population of MM pts. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib and Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan (BM) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Heather E. Oakervee ◽  
Nicola Foot ◽  
Samir Agrawal ◽  
Patricia Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background: Bortezomib as a single agent has known efficacy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 35% in the SUMMIT study and 46% in the APEX study. In-vitro studies including our own have demonstrated potent synergy with other chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan. It therefore follows that responses to bortezomib may be further improved by the combination of such drugs. Aims: The primary objectives of this Phase I/II study was to assess the safety, tolerability and response rates in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma; secondary objectives being time to progression (TTP) and overall surival (OS). Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised trial for patients with relapsed myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8 and 11 of each 28 day cycle with melphalan on day 2 at increasing dose levels. This was initially at 10mg/m2, but due to cytopenias subsequently at 2.5 and 5mg/m2 (levels 1a, 1 and 2) and we plan to escalate to 7.5mg/m2. Up to 8 cycles were given with dexamethasone added for stable or progressive disease after 4 or 2 cycles respectively. Responses were determined by EBMT criteria. Results: To date, 18 patients have been enrolled (12 male 6 female; median age 60 [range 44–73]; median number of prior therapies 3 [range 1–5] of which 17 have had at least one autologous stem cell procedure with high dose melphalan; 10 prior thalidomide and 2 prior bortezomib). 12 patients received melphalan at 10mg/m2 but due to unacceptable delays predominantly due to thrombocytopaenia, subsequent treatment levels commenced at 2.5mg/m2. The median number of cycles completed thus far is 4 (range 0–8) and of the 16 evaluable, the overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 50% rising to 75% following the addition of dexamethasone as per protocol. At level 1a (melphalan 10mg/m2 ,N=12, median number of cycles completed =5) the best responses (with dexamethasone as indicated) were: 1CR, 1 VGPR, 5 PR, 2 MR; at level 1 (melphalan 2.5mg/m2, N=4) 1 PR, 2 MR (after 2 cycles only). The median time to any response was 1 cycle (range 1–3 ). Three patients have progressive disease, but the median TTP and OS have not yet been reached (median follow-up 3 months). Non-haematological toxicities have been modest with 7 SAEs reported of which only 1 was possibly drug related (myocardial infarction), and 4 episodes of Grade 3 neuropathy (2 resulting in study withdrawal). The commonest grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was thrombocytopaenia (N=10) complicated by bleeding in one patient, followed by neutropenia (N=6). Summary: The combination of bortezomib and intravenous melphalan can be given safely to patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and dose escalation is ongoing. Myelosupression was the commonest grade 3–4 adverse event. A response rate of 50% was seen, which was further improved to 75% with the addition of dexamethasone. This combination may therefore result in higher responses than single agent bortezomib in heavily pretreated patients.

A Phase I/II Trial of Bortezomib, Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan and Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3542-3542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Catherine Williams ◽  
Mark Cook ◽  
Charles Craddock ◽  
Supratik Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib is an effective treatment for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with an overall response rate (MR+PR+CR) of 46% and time to progression of 6.2 months (APEX study). We and others have previously demonstrated potent in-vitro synergy with chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan and it is likely that this will translate into improved responses in the clinical setting. Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on Days 1,4,8 and 11 of a 28 day cycle, and intravenous melphalan on Day 2 for a maximum of 8 cycles. In the Phase I component melphalan was given at 2.5, 5,7.5 and 10mg/m2 in a dose escalation scheme and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 7.5mg/m2 was taken forward to an expanded Phase II component. Dexamethasone 20mg on the day of and the day after each dose of bortezomib was permitted for progressive or stable disease after 2 or 4 cycles respectively. Responses were classified by EBMT criteria. Results: To date 39 patients have been enrolled (median age 61years [range 40–77]) with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy [range 1–5] of which 26 (67%) have had one previous autologous stem cell procedure and 4 (10%) have had two. 23 (59%) have had prior exposure to thalidomide and 4 (10%) to bortezomib. 36 have now completed at least 1 cycle and are therefore evaluable for response. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 75% rising to 81% (CR 11%; nCR 3%; VGPR 8%; PR 39%; MR 19%) with the addition of dexamethasone in 13 cases for suboptimal response. Rapid responses were seen with the median time to response being 1 month [range 1–6]. The median time to progression is 10.1 months and the median overall survival has not yet been reached at a median follow-up of 7.4 months. Of the patients that have had disease progression 7 (35%) had responses of longer duration than their previous therapy. The MTD was defined by unacceptable delays in administering treatment due to myelosuppresion. The toxicities have been acceptable with 13 SAEs reported of which 8 were hospitalisation due to infection. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were: thrombocytopenia (53%), infections (25%), neutropenia (17%) and neuropathy (17%). Three grade 3 cardiac events were seen (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure) and GCSF was administered to 13 patients as treatment and prophylaxis of grade 4 neutropenia. 13 patients were withdrawn from the study due to toxicity of which 7 were for neuropathy and 3 for delayed haematological recovery. Of note, 11 patients (28%) had pre-existing grade 1 neuropathy prior to starting therapy. Summary: The combination of bortezomib, low dose intravenous melphalan and dexamethasone appears to be highly effective in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma where a response rate of 81% is seen with 14% achieving nCR/CR. The toxicity profile associated is predictable, manageable and predominantly haematological. Recruitment is ongoing to a total of 53 patients.

Bortezomib, Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan and Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Final Results of a Phase I/II Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2713-2713
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Catherine Williams ◽  
Mark Cook ◽  
Charles Craddock ◽  
Supratik Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib is an effective treatment for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with an overall response rate (≥PR) of 43% and time to progression of 6.2 months (APEX study). We and others have previously demonstrated potent in-vitro synergy with chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan and it is likely that this will translate into improved responses in the clinical setting. Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on Days 1,4,8 and 11 of a 28 day cycle, and intravenous melphalan on Day 2 for a maximum of 8 cycles. In the Phase I component melphalan was given at 2.5, 5,7.5 and 10mg/m2 in a dose escalation scheme and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 7.5mg/m2 was taken forward to an expanded Phase II component. Dexamethasone 20mg on the day of and the day after each dose of bortezomib was permitted for progressive or stable disease after 2 or 4 cycles respectively. Responses were defined by EBMT criteria. Results: 53 patients were enrolled (median age 61years [range 40–77]) with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy [range 1–5] of which 26 (67%) have had one previous autologous stem cell procedure and 4 (10%) have had two. 23 (59%) have had prior exposure to thalidomide and 4 (10%) to bortezomib. The overall response rate (≥PR) across all treatment levels (n=52) was 65% rising to 69% (CR 19%; nCR 4%; VGPR 6%; PR 40%; MR 15%) with the addition of dexamethasone in 27 cases for suboptimal response. Of the 32 patients treated at the MTD the overall response rate (≥PR) was 78% (CR 28%; nCR 6%; VGPR 6%; PR 38%; MR 9%). Rapid responses were seen with the median time to response being 1 month [range 1–6]. The median time to progression was 10 months and the median overall survival has not yet been reached at a median follow-up of 17 months. Of the patients that have had disease progression 7 (35%) had responses of longer duration than their previous therapy. The MTD was defined by unacceptable delays in administering treatment due to myelosuppresion. The toxicities have been acceptable with 13 SAEs reported of which 8 were hospitalisation due to infection. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were: thrombocytopenia (53%), infections (25%), neutropenia (17%) and neuropathy (17%). Three grade 3 cardiac events were seen (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure) and GCSF was administered to 13 patients as treatment and prophylaxis of grade 4 neutropenia. 19 patients were withdrawn from the study due to toxicity of which 7 were for neuropathy and 3 for delayed haematological recovery. Of note, 11 patients (28%) had pre-existing grade 1 neuropathy prior to starting therapy. Summary: The combination of bortezomib, low dose intravenous melphalan and dexamethasone appears to be highly effective in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with a response rate (≥PR) at the MTD of 78% including 34% nCR/CR. The toxicity profile is predominantly haematological.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1874-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Saima Dean ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

Phase I-II Trial of Bortezomib Plus Oral Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (29) ◽  
pp. 4777-4783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Giovanni Piza Rodriguez ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Vishal Kukreti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PurposeThe combination of oral weekly cyclophosphamide and alternate day prednisone is a convenient regimen for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), and we sought to improve its efficacy by adding bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor with proven antimyeloma activity.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a phase I-II trial evaluating six dose levels to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination in relapsed/refractory MM. An additional 10 patients were evaluated at the highest dose level reached.ResultsThirty-seven patients were treated on this study. The MTD was not defined. Both of the highest dose levels of bortezomib tested (1.3 mg/m2on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and 1.5 mg/m2on days 1, 8, and 15, each on a 28-day cycle) could be safely given with cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2per week and prednisone. At these dose levels, the overall response rate was 95% (complete responses [CR] plus partial response plus minimal response), with CR observed in more than 50% of patients. The weekly bortezomib regimen resulted in fewer instances of grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 1 to 2 peripheral neuropathy; the 1-year progression-free and overall survival probabilities with this dose level were 83% (95% CI, 73% to 96%) and 100%, respectively.ConclusionWeekly bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2plus oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone produces an unprecedented response rate and encouraging 1-year survival in relapsed/refractory patients with MM. Further evaluation of this promising regimen is warranted both in relapsed and newly diagnosed disease.

Bortezomib in Combination with Dexamethasone and Subsequent Thalidomide for Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Chinese Patients.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4827-4827
Author(s):  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Weiyan Zheng ◽  
Guoqing Wei ◽  
Xiujin Ye ◽  
Jingsong He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
International Staging System ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib-dexamethasone-thalidomide has been reported to be effective in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with an overall response rate of 92% and a CR rate of 18% (Alexanian et al, Hematology12(3):235–239, 2007), but this regimen has not been reported in Chinese patients. We now report our experience with this combination. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in combination of dexamethasone plus subsequent thalidomide as primary treatment for MM. Patients and Method: Between June 2006 and August 2007, 11 consecutive newly-diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM were treated with bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, dexamethasone at 20 mg/m2 IV daily on the day of bortezomib and the day after. All patients received daily oral thalidomide that was escalated from 100 mg to 200 mg. Seven of 11 patients were male and 4 were female. Median age was 57 years (range 47–86). Seven of 11 patients were stage 2 according to the International Staging System, 4 out of 11 patients were stage 3. Eleven patients received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range 1–6). The Blade criteria were used for response evaluation. Toxicities were evaluated according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 3. Results: Nine out of 11 patients (82%) achieved PR and 2 (18%) achieved CR; therefore the overall response rate was 100%. With a median follow-up duration of 5 months (1– 14 months), no patients died. Grade 3–4 toxicities included fatigue (3/11), thrombocytopenia (3/11), diarrhea (3/11) and orthostatic hypotension (2/11). Grade 2 neuropathy occurred in 3 out of 11 patients, herpes zoster occurred in 3 out of 11 patients. Routine anticoagulation or anti-thrombosis was not used. There was no DVT/PE in 11 patients. Conclusion: Our preliminary experience indicated that bortezomib-dexamethasone-thalidomide is highly effective in newly-diagnosed MM. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare after median 2 cycles of therapy. The relative lower rates of neuropathy and DVT/PE in this report with Chinese MM patients are being cautiously observed.

Interim Results of An Ongoing Clinical Study Suggests Efficacy and Improved Toxicity Profile with Once a Week Bortezomib with Dexamethasone In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with Older Age and Co-Morbidities

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3061-3061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil C. Munshi ◽  
Saem Lee ◽  
Suman Kambhampati ◽  
Abid Mohiuddin ◽  
Michal Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Current Time ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Abstract 3061 The current bortezomib schedule involves administration of the drug twice a week at 1.3 mg/m2 for 2 weeks every 21 days. This regimen although effective is inconvenient and associated with side effects including neuropathy and gastrointestinal toxicities that limits its use in a proportion of patients. Therefore, to improve convenience and compliance, we have investigated efficacy and safety of a weekly regimen of bortezomib. In this one-stage phase II multi-center, open-label single-arm study bortezomib is administered once a week at 1.6 mg/m2 in combination with dexamethasone in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not considered for autologous stem cell transplant in participating Veterans Hospitals nationwide. The objective is to evaluate overall response rate and toxicity of this regimen. Patients received bortezomib at 1.6 mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 weeks followed by 1 week off and dexamethasone 40mg PO on the day of and day after each dose of bortezomib. Patients may receive 6 such 5-week cycles. At the current time 32 patients (median age - 73; range 50–88) have been enrolled at 11 Veterans Administration Hospital across the U.S. Patients had significant co-morbidities including 61% with cardiovascular problems, 58% with diabetes and/or hyperlipidemia, 58% with elevation of serum creatinine, 26% with respiratory problems and 23% with previous history of cancer. All patients were at least on 5 daily medications. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 25 patients have received at least one cycle of therapy and were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy, while 6 patients have received less than one cycle of therapy and one patient has inadequate data. With a median of 4 cycles administered, this regimen was well tolerated. None of the patients have developed grade 3 neuropathy, while grade 1 neuropathy was observed only in 2 patients and one patient with grade 1 neuropathy at diagnosis had increase to grade 2. Dexamethasone dose was reduced in 29% patients while 6% required reduction in bortezomib dose to 1.3 mg/m2. Additionally, Grade ≥1 asthenia was observed in 42%, diarrhea in 35%, and thrombocytopenia in 26%. Four patients have died of co-morbidities which were considered unrelated or probably unrelated to the treatment with bortezomib. The partial response or better was achieved in 68% patients receiving at least 1 cycle of therapy; 20% patients achieved CR/nCR and additional 12% achieved VGPR. Including MR in the analysis, overall response was observed in all evaluable patients. On intent to treat analysis including all 32 patients, overall response rate (≥ MR) was observed in 78% patients and PR or better in 53% patients. These preliminary results suggest that the once a week bortezomib regimen is effective and tolerable with reduced toxicity even in this older patient population with significant co-morbidities. Disclosures: Munshi: Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Millennium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

Phase 1b Dose Escalation Study Of Oral Quisinostat, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor (HDACi), In Combination With Velcade (Bortezomib) and Dexamethasone For Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1932-1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Cyrille Touzeau ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
Martine Delain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background HDACi inhibits aggresome function by acetylation of the tubulin-dynein complex that transports unfolded proteins via aggresomes to lysosomes for degradation, thereby serving as a mechanism for reversal of resistance to proteasome inhibitors. In vivo data have shown that quisinostat, a new oral pan HDACi, has a synergistic activity with bortezomib in preclinical models of MM. Methods Patients were treated with: quisinostat (Q) at escalated doses from 6 to 8 to 10 to 12 mg on days 1, 3, and 5 weekly, subcutaneous VELCADE (V) at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 3-week cycle, and oral dexamethasone (D) at 20 mg on the day of and the day after VELCADE dosing. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Q in the combination (Q+V+D). The secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate, and pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Results The study has completed enrollment and eighteen patients with relapsed MM (3, 3, 6, and 6 in the 6, 8, 10 and 12 mgQ+D+V cohorts, respectively) were enrolled: 56% male; median age of 69 (range 50-82) years; all subjects received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy (39% received 1, 50% received 2 and 11% received 3 prior lines) and half of the patients were previously exposed and sensitive to bortezomib. To date, 17 out of 18 patients (94%) discontinued treatment, among which 5 completed 11 cycles of therapy. One patient is currently ongoing. At the highest dose level (i.e., 12 mg), 2 of 6 (33%) patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT): QTc prolongation and atrial fibrillation. The MTD was therefore established at 10 mg Q for the Q+V+D regimen. Quisinostat oral absorption was rapid, with maximum plasma concentrations achieved approximately between 1 and 3 hours after drug intake. The estimated effective half-life was between 2.5 to 15 hours. Quisinostat Cmaxand AUC were comparable to previous clinical observations and increased approximately proportional with increased dose. VELCADE exposure was in line with previous clinical observations. Most common (≥15% of patients) drug related adverse events were asthenia (56%), thrombocytopenia (56%), diarrhea (44%), oedema peripheral (39%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (39%), constipation (33%), insomnia (28%), neuralgia (28%), vomiting (28%) and nausea (28%); most of them were grade 2 or lower in toxicity. The most common (≥10% of patients) grade ≥3 drug related events included thrombocytopenia (39%), QT prolongation (11%), asthenia (11%) and insomnia (11%). Dose reduction for myelosuppression (thrombocytopenia ≥G3) was required for VELCADE in 4 patients in the 10 and 12 mg cohorts. Quisinostat dose reductions were required for asthenia G2 and G3 in 2 patients (dose level 8 and 10mg). The overall response rate was 88.2% (15 of 17 patients, 95% CI: 63.6% to 98.5%), including 1 complete response, 3 very good partial responses, and 11 partial responses. The median duration of response was 6.8 months, ranging between 2.8 and 19.6 months. The observed pharmacokinetic profiles of quisinostat and bortezomib were in line with historical data. Two of 5 patients showed an increase in acetylated histone 3 from baseline as measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Conclusion Preliminary results indicate that the MTD is 10 mg quisinostat in combination with standard doses of VELCADE and dexamethasone. The combination is active in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma with a high response rate and has an acceptable safety profile. Disclosures: Moreau: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Facon:Janssen: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Benboubker:Celgene: Consultancy. Badamo-Dotzis:Quintiles: Employment. Phelps:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Doty:Janssen: Employment. Smit:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fourneau:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forslund:Janssen: Employment. Hellemans:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leleu:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium : Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Phase I/II study of R-ICE (rituximab-ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide) with lenalidomide (R2-ICE) in patients with first-relapse/primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in academic and community cancer research united (ACCRU) network.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8073-TPS8073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Guerra-Bauman ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
William R. Macon ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Umar Farooq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Lymphoma Therapy

TPS8073 Background: Response rates to salvage immunochemotherapy in patients with DLBCL relapsing after or refractory (R/R DLBCL) to front line therapy remain unsatisfactory. Lenalidomide (Len) has significant single agent activity in relapsed/refractory DLBCL. The addition of lenalidomide (Len) days 1-7 to rituximab plus ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide (RICE) was shown to be feasible with promising efficacy in phase 1b study (Feldman T, et al. BJH, 2014). We developed phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of Len (extended to 14 day schedule) to RICE (R2-ICE) for R/R-DLBCL patients who are candidates for stem cell transplant. Methods: The phase I portion was designed to determine the maximally tolerated dose Len in combination with RICE using the standard cohort 3+3 design. The escalation dose levels were 15 mg and 20 mg daily x 14 days. Prophylactic aspirin and growth factor support is mandatory. After 2 cycles of therapy response is evaluated with a PET/CT scan; the responding patients are eligible for 1-2 additional cycles of R2ICE as a bridging before HDC/SCT. The estimated overall response rate for two cycles of R-ICE in R/R DLBCL to RCHOP was estimated to be approximate 45%. We hypothesize that the addition of lenalidomide in the relapse setting could increase the overall response rate by approximately 20%. The one-stage design with an interim analysis being utilized in phase 2 requires 45 evaluable patients (one sided alpha = 0.09, power 90%). For Phase I, all types of B-cell lymphomas were eligible. For phase II portion only DLBCL patients are eligible per central pathology review. Other eligibility criteria include: received one line of previous anti-lymphoma therapy, ≥ 2 weeks from completion of prior anti-lymphoma therapy, candidate for HDC and SCT, adequate organ (creatinine clearance ≥ 60ml/min by Cockcroft-, total bilirubin ≤ 2 × ULN) and bone marrow function (ANC) ≥1500/mm3; platelet count ≥75,000/mm3). The use of steroids and/or rituximab up to 1 week prior to registration for management of symptoms is allowed. 9 patients cleared phase 1 without DLT and dose of 20 mg days 1 -14 was recommend for phase 2 part (RP2D) of the study. The phase 2 study passed interim futility analysis and accrual continues. Correlatives include cell of origin by Nanostring, Myc/bcl2 expression and by FISH and minimal residual disease. PET scans are centrally reviewed including metabolic tumor volume. Clinical trial information: NCT02628405 .

Presentation Characteristics, Risk Profiles and Response to Thalidomide in a Public Health System, Minority Patient Population with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5189-5189
Author(s):  
Shylendra B Sreenivasappa ◽  
Mousami Shah ◽  
Rosalind Catchatourian ◽  
Luciano Fochesatto ◽  
Barbara Yim
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
Historical Controls

Abstract Background: Multiple Myeloma is a clonal plasma cell malignancy which accounts for about 10% of all hematological malignancies. Introduction of thalidomide has revolutionized the treatment. We have characterized the risk profiles and response to thalidomide in a minority cohort socio-economically ineligible for stem cell transplant. Methods: 113 patients (pts) with Multiple myeloma who were treated with thalidomide between the periods of 2002–2008 were identified and studied as a retrospective cohort. Demographics, presentation, dosage schedule, tolerability and response were analyzed. Categorical data via Fisher’s exact test and time to progression data was analyzed via Kaplan Meier life table analysis and log rank test. Results: Demographic and disease characteristics of 113 pts are as follows: 73 (64.6%) females, 40(35.4%) males, 71(62.8%) african american, 23(20.4%) hispanic, 10(8.8%) caucasian and 9(8%) others. The median age at diagnosis was 58.5 years, with 86(76.1%) being 65 or younger and 27 (23.9%) older than 65. 90(79.6%) pts had 2 or less co morbidities. 99(87.6%) pts could not receive stem cell transplant. Bone pain was the most common presenting symptom (35%). 68 had lytic lesions (60%). 21(18.6%) pts were Durie Salmon stage I, 26(23%) stage II, 56(49.5%) Stage III and 10 had missing data. 65(57.5%) had IgG disease, 27(23.8%) IgA and 20(17.7% light chain disease. 64 (56.6%) pts had received a prior therapy. Almost all patients received thalidomide and dexamethsone. Thalidomide was started at 50 or 100mg and the dose was escalated by 50 mg upon progression. 54 (47.8%) pts were started on 50 mg of thalidomide, 55 (48.7%) on 100mg, 3 (2.7%) on 200mg and 1 (0.9%) on 150mg. Thalidomide was discontinued either due to intolerance or disease progression. Patients receiving 50 mg of thalidomide as starting dose (n=54), had an overall response rate (ORR) of 61%. Of these 4 (7.4%) had VGPR, 10 (18.5%) PR and 19(35.2%) stable disease (SD). Median time to dose escalation was 4 months (range 1–36 months). 19 pts were dose escalated to 100mg and achieved an ORR of 79%. Of these 19 pts, 11(57.8%) had SD, 4 (21%) had PR and 4 (21%) had progression of disease. The mean duration of thalidomide therapy in this sub group was 9.94 months. 10 deaths were noted in the group. In pts on 100mg of thalidomide upfront, (n=55) ORR was 69.1%.1 pt (1.8%) had a CR, 3 (5.5%) had VGPR, 18 (32.7%) had PR and 16 (29.1%) had SD. The median time to dose escalation was 7 months (range 1–84 months). Thalidomide dose was increased in 8 pts and ORR of this subgroup was 50%, 1 pt (12.5%) had a CR and 3 (37.5%) had SD. The median duration of therapy in this sub group is 19.5 months and 8 deaths were noted. In the entire cohort the overall response rate to thalidomide and dexamethasone was 69.1%. The median duration of therapy was 8 months (range of 1 to 84 months) and median follow up was 22 months (range 1 to 173). The incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 toxicity are as follows: 12 (10.5%) had neurologic, 2(1.8%) had constitutional side effects, 3 (2.5%) gastrointestinal, 5 (4.4%) venous thromboembolism. 7 (6.3%) infection related complications, 3(2.7%) musculoskeletal, 3 (2.7%) had renal. We documented 18 deaths (12 stage III and 6 stage II). Aspirin for DVT prophylaxis was used in 80(70.8%) pts, coumadin in 4 (3.5%). Discussion: In our minority cohort the median age at diagnosis was much younger than the historical control (58.5 yr vs 62). More than 75% of pts were younger than 65 years and more than half presented with advanced stage. The frequency of monoclonal immunoglobulin was similar to historical controls and so was the overall response to treatment. The incidence of adverse events was much lower than historical controls and this was inspite of longer duration of thalidomide therapy. Conclusion: Ethnic minority patients present with advanced disease and at younger age. Transplant ineligible patients may benefit from a stepwise increment in the dosing of thalidomide and this may account for fewer side effects even on prolonged therapy. Step wise dosing schedule needs to be tested in a prospective randomized trial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document