Long-Term Use of Open-Label Romiplostim in Children with Chronic/Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Abstract Abstract 621 Background: Treatment options for children with chronic/refractory ITP are not well characterized. In a phase 1/2 16-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 22 patients (romiplostim n = 17, placebo n = 5), the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist romiplostim was well tolerated and 15 of 17 romiplostim-treated patients achieved platelet counts ≥50×109/L (Bussel et al, Blood 2011). Twenty-one of 22 patients from this phase 1/2 study subsequently entered an open-label extension study; 1/21 patients discontinued the extension study before receiving romiplostim. For the 20 patients who received romiplostim in the first extension study, the mean duration of treatment was 1.6 years (range, 0.1 to 2.1 years); all 20 achieved platelet counts >50×109/L (Nugent et al, 2011 ASPHO abstracts). Of the 17 patients who completed this extension study, 12 rolled over into a second open-label extension study for up to 2.5 years of further romiplostim treatment. Results from those 12 patients are described here. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of romiplostim in pediatric ITP. Methods: During the second extension study, patients received weekly subcutaneous injections of romiplostim with the initial dose being the same as the last dose in the prior study. Dose adjustment was allowed to maintain platelet counts in the target range of 50–200×109/L. The maximum allowed romiplostim dose was 10 μg/kg. The primary endpoint of this study was incidence of adverse events; platelet response was a secondary endpoint. The protocol did not require bone marrow biopsies to be conducted at pre-defined intervals, but any bone marrow biopsies performed as clinically indicated were to be analyzed. As deemed appropriate by investigators, patients or their caregivers had the option to administer romiplostim at home during this study; those patients who administered romiplostim at home used diary cards to record dosing date, time, volume administered, and any dosing errors. Patients who turned 18 years of age during this study were permitted to remain on study. Results: Baseline demographics for this second extension study included a median age of 12 years (range 3, 16 years), 67% male, and 33% with a prior splenectomy. Median romiplostim treatment duration in this second extension study was 118.9 weeks (range 100.1, 125.9 weeks); median average weekly romiplostim dose was 5.2 μg/kg (range 1, 10 μg/kg). Of the 3 patients who discontinued the study, 2 withdrew consent and 1 was noncompliant; no patients withdrew due to safety issues and 9 continued on study. Median platelet counts for all 12 patients were above 50×109/L throughout, and were in the target range of 50–200×109/L for all visits but Weeks 3 and 76 (Figure). Interestingly, the median dose decreased over time from a median (Q1, Q3) of 8.0 (5.5, 9.0) μg/kg at Week 1 to 1.0 (0.0, 6.0) μg/kg at Week 116 (last timepoint for which data are available) (Figure). Two patients received rescue medications (defined as medications used for platelet counts <10×109/L, bleeding/wet purpura, or investigator decision); one patient received platelet transfusions and another prednisone. Four patients (33.3%) had serious adverse events (asthma, epistaxis, hemangioma, hypotension, pyrexia, thrombocytopenia, and transfusion reaction) and one had a life-threatening adverse event (thrombocytopenia). None of the adverse events were deemed treatment-related by the investigators. There were no fatal adverse events. Eight patients had bleeding adverse events; one of which (gingival bleeding) was deemed treatment-related. These bleeding adverse events included epistaxis (4 patients), petechiae (3 patients), gingival bleeding (2 patients), and (in 1 patient each) bleeding from the anus, injection site, lip, and mouth; 1 patient also had unspecified bleeding. No bone marrow biopsies were reported to have been performed. Conclusion: In this open-label extension study, romiplostim increased platelet counts in pediatric patients with chronic ITP without significant toxicity. Thus, romiplostim has been well tolerated and shown to be of clinical benefit to pediatric patients with refractory severe chronic ITP. As this study is ongoing, future results will provide additional data regarding even longer-term use of TPO receptor agonists in this patient population. Disclosures: Bussel: Cangene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Family owns GSK stock, Family owns GSK stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Amgen: Family owns Amgen stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of romiplostim in pediatric patients was examined in this study. Nie:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy Of Long-Term Open-Label Romiplostim Dosing In Thrombocytopenic Pediatric Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3530.3530 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3530-3530

Author(s):

Michael D. Tarantino ◽

James B. Bussel ◽

Amy Geddis ◽

Michael F. Guerrera ◽

Alan K. Ikeda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Chronic pediatric ITP is an autoimmune disorder characterized by increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production, resulting in low platelet counts. Romiplostim is a peptibody that stimulates platelet production via activation of the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor. Romiplostim increased and maintained platelet counts in thrombocytopenic children with ITP in a phase 1/2 trial. Patients who completed this study or an ongoing phase 3 trial were given the option of rolling over into an open-label long-term extension study. Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of romiplostim in pediatric ITP. Methods Patients received weekly subcutaneous injections of romiplostim; the starting dose was the last dose in the prior study. Patients who had received placebo started at 1 μg/kg. Dose adjustments targeted platelet counts in the range of 50–200 x 109/L. The maximum allowed romiplostim dose was 10 µg/kg. Assessments of adverse events, concomitant medications, and local platelet counts were performed weekly. The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. The protocol did not require bone marrow biopsies to be performed, but when performed, specimens were submitted to a central lab for analysis. Patients who were on a stable dose had the option to receive romiplostim at home; patients and their caregivers then recorded dosing date, time, volume administered, and any dosing errors. Patients who turned 18 years of age during this study were permitted to remain on study. Results Twenty-two patients (N = 12 from the phase 1/2 study and N = 10 from the phase 3 study) were treated with romiplostim for up to 172 weeks (3.3 years). Baseline demographics included a median age of 12.0 years (range 3–16), 50% male, and 18.2% with prior splenectomy. Median romiplostim treatment duration was 89.0 weeks (range 3–172); median total number of doses was 64 (range 3–171); median average weekly romiplostim dose was 4.0 µg/kg (range 1–10), including ramp up to stable dose; and median maximum dose was 8.0 µg/kg (range 1–10). Of the 4 patients who discontinued the study, 3 withdrew consent and 1 was noncompliant; no patients withdrew due to safety issues and 18 continued on study. After the first week of this extension study, which for some patients was the first week of romiplostim, median platelet counts remained above 50 x 109/L throughout the study, and were in the target range of 50–200 x 109/L for all visits but weeks 76 and 156 (Figure). The median romiplostim dose (Q1, Q3) was 6.0 (2.0, 8.0) µg/kg at week 1 and 3.5 (0.0, 7.0) µg/kg at week 168 (Figure). Four patients discontinued romiplostim. Eight patients received rescue medications (defined as medications used for platelet counts < 10 x 109/L, bleeding/wet purpura, or investigator decision) which included immunoglobulins (3 patients), tranexamic acid (3 patients), platelet transfusion (1 patient), aminocaproic acid (1 patient), and prednisone (1 patient). Four patients had serious adverse events (asthma, hemangioma, hypotension, infection, thrombocytopenia, and transfusion reaction) and 1 had life-threatening adverse events (infection and thrombocytopenia). None of the serious adverse events were deemed treatment-related by the investigators. There were no fatal adverse events. Twelve patients had bleeding adverse events; 2 of which were deemed treatment-related (gingival bleeding and petechiae). Bleeding adverse events included epistaxis (4 patients); petechiae (3 patients); gingival bleeding (2 patients); hemorrhage (2 patients); and bleeding from the anus, injection site, lip, and mouth (1 patient each). No bone marrow biopsies were performed as part of this study. Conclusion In this open-label extension study, long term treatment with romiplostim maintained platelet counts in pediatric patients with chronic ITP without significant toxicity. Future results from this ongoing study will provide additional safety and efficacy data regarding long-term use of romiplostim in children with ITP. Disclosures: Tarantino: Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BPL: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Romiplostim is approved for the treatment of adults with chronic ITP. Romiplostim is not approved for the treatment of pediatric patients with chronic ITP. Bussel:Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Symphogen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nie:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Sustained Hemostatic Platelet Counts in Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Following Cessation of Treatment with the TPO Receptor Agonist Romiplostim: Report of 9 Cases,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3281.3281 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3281-3281 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

James B Bussel ◽

Francesco Rodeghiero ◽

Roger M. Lyons ◽

Barry Firstenberg ◽

Joanne Joseph ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Extension Study ◽

Open Label ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Long Term Treatment ◽

Open Label Extension ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3281 Background: While romiplostim is often perceived as a long-term treatment for adults with chronic ITP, previous data suggest that some patients can maintain hemostatic platelet counts when romiplostim is permanently discontinued, as occurred in 7 of 83 romiplostim-treated patients in the pivotal trials (Kuter et al, Lancet 2008) and as presented at the 2011 EHA meeting (Newland et al, 2011). Methods: We describe 9 patients from an open-label extension study (N = 291, Bussel et al, Blood 2009) who had ITP of various durations unresponsive to treatments such as splenectomy, corticosteroids, IVIg, anti-D, danazol, azathioprine, and rituximab. Romiplostim was administered at the same dose as in the previous study or at 1 μg/kg (if patients had previously received placebo) and adjusted by no more than 1 μg/kg weekly to maintain platelet counts at 50–200×109/L. These patients were selected for this report because romiplostim was discontinued and hemostatic platelet counts maintained for at least 6 months. Results: In these cases, patients had ITP ranging in duration from 0.1 to 5.5 years and between 2 and 5 prior ITP therapies before entering romiplostim clinical trials (Table). The duration over which romiplostim was received in these cases (previous study and extension study combined) ranged from 37 to 139 weeks. No clinically significant bleeding (grade ≥3) was observed with romiplostim in these patients during the initial studies; during the open-label extension, epistaxis in Week 10 and gastrointestinal hemorrhage in Week 18 were reported for Case 6. Examination of these 9 cases indicates that there are no factors that appear to predict which patients, after discontinuing romiplostim, will achieve hemostatic platelet counts off treatment. Of note, as this was a post hoc analysis and not a prespecified endpoint, there may be other cases in which hemostatic platelet counts were maintained without romiplostim treatment. Summary/conclusions: Dose adjustment rules allow romiplostim to be discontinued when appropriate. These case reports indicate that some patients may not require romiplostim indefinitely. In the absence of other ITP treatments (e.g., immunosuppressive therapies), hemostatic platelet counts can be maintained in certain cases after cessation of romiplostim. We believe that more such cases will become known, allowing us to gain greater insights into which ITP patients are able to discontinue romiplostim and to the relationship to the natural history of ITP and possible remission. Potential mechanisms for this phenomenon should be explored, including what role is played by the improvement of T-regulatory cell function in the presence of hemostatic platelet counts (Bao et al, Blood 2010). Table Patient data Disclosures: Bussel: Portola: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sysmex: Research Funding. Rodeghiero:GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Suppremol: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lyons:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kessler:Amgen: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Griffols: Consultancy, Research Funding. Terriou:Amgen: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Stasi:GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Suppremol: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nycomed: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Baxter: Honoraria. Chang:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jun:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Hang Quach ◽

Simon J Harrison ◽

Je-Jung Lee ◽

Nichloas Murphy ◽

Jae Hoon Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Romiplostim in over 200 Children with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Results of an Integrated Database of 5 Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-109763 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2428-2428 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael D. Tarantino ◽

Jenny M. Despotovic ◽

John Roy ◽

John Grainger ◽

Nichola Cooper ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Response ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Baseline Platelet Count ◽

Platelet Counts

Abstract Background: Romiplostim is approved globally for use in adults with ITP and in the EU for children with ITP. More comprehensive data are needed on the use of romiplostim in children with ITP. Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in trials in children with ITP. Methods: Data were combined from 5 romiplostim trials in children with ITP, both placebo-controlled (a phase 1/2 and a phase 3 trial) and open-label (a 3-year trial and 2 extension trials); trial data have been reported previously (Bussel Blood 2011, Bussel PBC 2014, Tarantino Lancet 2016, Tarantino ASH 2017, Grainger ASH 2017). Platelet counts in the 4 weeks after use of rescue medication were excluded from analyses. Descriptive statistics were used. Number (n), mean, standard deviation (SD), median, quartile range (Q1, Q3), minimum (min), and maximum (max) for continuous variables, and number and percentage for categorical variables were provided. Results: Patients (N=286, 24 initially placebo and 262 initially romiplostim) had median (Q1, Q3) age of 10 (6, 13) years, ITP duration of 1.9 (1, 4) years, and baseline platelet count of 14 (8, 23)×109/L. Previously, 88% had received corticosteroids, 87% IVIg, and 21% rituximab; 23% had received >3 prior treatments and 7% had prior splenectomy. Of the 282 patients exposed to romiplostim (20 initially received placebo), the median (min, max) duration of treatment was 65 (8, 471) weeks, with a median (min, max) average weekly dose of 6.6 (0.1, 9.7) μg/kg; total exposure was 468 patient-years. The most common reasons for discontinuing the parent study for romiplostim-treated patients were per protocol (19%; eg, sponsor decision, death, lost to follow-up), consent withdrawn (3%), noncompliance (1%), and administrative decision (1%). Of romiplostim-treated patients, 24% had serious adverse events (SAEs), most commonly epistaxis, low platelet counts, and headache (Table). There were 7 cases of postbaseline neutralizing antibody against romiplostim: 2 transient and 5 persistent. There were no neutralizing antibodies against endogenous TPO. For patients undergoing bone marrow biopsies in the 3-year open-label trial, there were no findings of collagen or bone marrow abnormalities (Year 1 n=27, Year 2 n=5, vs. baseline) (Grainger et al, ASH 2017). One patient had an increase in modified Bauermeister bone marrow grade from 0 to 2 (fine reticulin fiber network) with no associated AEs (the only AEs were a cold and injection site pain); per protocol, there was no follow-up biopsy. Once at a steady dose of 10 μg/kg, most (11/16) of this patient's platelet counts were ≥30×109/L. Investigators reported thrombocytosis AEs; 1 patient had a platelet count of 1462×109/L at Week 14 for 1 week and another had elevated platelet counts 10 times between Weeks 20-172 (max of 872×109/L); there were no associated thrombotic events. Median platelet counts rose quickly and were over 50×109/L from Week 12 on (Figure). Platelet response rates also rose quickly. Overall, 89% of romiplostim-treated patients (vs 8% of placebo) had a platelet response (platelet counts ≥50×109/L; Figure). For romiplostim-treated patients, the first platelet responses occurred after a median of 6 weeks. The median % (Q1, Q3) of months responding was 76% (25%, 93%) and # of months responding was 11 (3, 20); from time of first monthly response, the median (Q1, Q3) % of months responding was 92% (75%, 100%) and # of months responding was 14 (7, 23). Nineteen romiplostim-treated patients discontinued all ITP therapies including romiplostim for ≥6 months while maintaining platelet counts ≥50×109/L (here defined as remission). These treatment-free periods lasted a median (Q1, Q3) of 12 (8, 14) months; no placebo patients remained free of treatment. There were no clear differences between those who did and did not enter remission (ie, age, sex, race, past treatment, ITP duration, baseline platelet count). Bleeding was reported for most (68%) patients: mostly grade 1/2, with 10% having grade 3 bleeding (most commonly epistaxis in 13 patients) and 2 patients having grade 4 bleeding (both reported as "ITP"). Conclusions: In this comprehensive database of romiplostim ITP trials in 286 children with 468 patient-years of romiplostim exposure, romiplostim was well tolerated. With romiplostim, the vast majority (89%) of patients had a platelet response, with some children able to discontinue all ITP treatments for ≥6 months. Disclosures Tarantino: Health Resources and Services Administration: Research Funding; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: Reviews grants; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Despotovic:AmGen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Grainger:Biotest: Consultancy; Ono Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cooper:Amgen, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

An Interim Analysis Of a Phase 2, Single-Arm Study Of Platelet Responses and Remission Rates In Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Receiving Romiplostim

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1074.1074 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1074-1074 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Roberto Stasi ◽

Adrian Newland ◽

Bertrand Godeau ◽

Victor Priego ◽

Jean-Francois Viallard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Treatment Period ◽

Research Funding ◽

Alternative Therapy ◽

Platelet Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Platelet Counts

Abstract Background We describe here platelet response and remission observed with romiplostim treatment in patients with ITP. Methods Patients with an ITP diagnosis for less than 6 months who received first-line therapies only (ie, corticosteroids, IVIG, anti-D) received QW romiplostim for up to 12 months in the treatment period (Fig 1). The primary objective was to describe the number of months with a platelet response during the 12-month treatment period; secondary objectives included incidence of ITP remission and splenectomy. The romiplostim dose was increased QW by 1 μg/kg from 1 μg/kg up to 10 μg/kg to reach a platelet count of ≥50x109/L, adjusting to maintain a platelet count of 50-200x109/L. Patients who maintained platelet counts ≥50x109/L on romiplostim only entered a dose-tapering period in which the romiplostim dose was decreased by 1 μg/kg Q2W as long as platelet counts remained ≥50x109/L. Starting when the dose tapered to 0 during either the 12-month treatment period or at the end of the dose-tapering period, patients were followed to determine whether they had ITP remission (24 weeks platelet counts ≥50x109/L without any treatment for ITP, including romiplostim). At the end of 12 months, patients who 1) had platelet counts ≤20x109/L for <4 consecutive weeks, 2) had platelet counts of 20-50x109/L, and/or 3) were receiving treatment for ITP besides romiplostim had the option to enter a stabilization period (≤8 weeks) while the investigator determined suitable post-study therapy. Patients with platelet counts ≤20x109/L for ≥4 consecutive weeks on the highest romiplostim dose were discontinued from the study for non-response. Interim data up to March 2013 are reported here. Results Of the patient population (N = 71), 59.2% were women, median (Q1, Q3) age was 37 (28, 56) years, median (Q1, Q3) time since ITP diagnosis was 2.2 (0.9, 4.4) months, and median (Q1, Q3) platelet count at screening was 20 (12, 25) x109/L. Past treatments included steroids (96%), IVIG (42%), and anti-D (1%). Prior to the study, platelet transfusions were received by 9% of patients. 30 patients (42%) completed treatment, 31 (44%) are continuing treatment, and 10 (14%) discontinued romiplostim (due to consent withdrawn n = 2, adverse event n = 3, requirement for alternative therapy n = 3, lost to follow-up n = 1, death n = 1). Patients had a median (Q1, Q3) of 51 (34, 52) weeks of treatment with a median (Q1, Q3) average QW dose of 2.1 (1, 3.8) μg/kg. 66 (93%) patients had a peak platelet count ≥50x109/L. The median (Q1, Q3) time with a platelet response was 9 (6, 12) months; the median (95% CI) time to platelet response was 2.1 (1.1, 3.1) weeks; platelet counts are in Fig 2. Of 38 evaluable patients (ie, known remission status), 11 (29%, 95% CI 15% to 46%) had ITP remission. One patient had a splenectomy and 6 had treatment failure (defined as platelet count ≤20x109/L for 4 consecutive weeks at 10 μg/kg QW, requirement of alternative therapy, or death). Of the 71 patients receiving romiplostim, 9 patients had serious adverse events (2 treatment-related: 1 case each of gastritis and increased transaminases). There were also 3 adverse events leading to discontinuation of romiplostim (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, leukocytosis, and the aforementioned increased transaminases, these last 2 treatment-related). Other serious adverse events, also occurring in 1 patient each, included atrial fibrillation, dapsone syndrome, fecaloma, the aforementioned non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, pleuritic pain, and tendon rupture. There were no fatalities reported as adverse events; the death leading to discontinuation was due to cerebral hemorrhage which began before the patient received romiplostim. The most common adverse events were headache (17%), arthralgia (13%), and nasopharyngitis (10%). The most common hemorrhage adverse events were hematoma (7%), petechiae (7%), and epistaxis (7%). No bone marrow findings were reported. Conclusions In this trial, patients with an ITP diagnosis for less than 6 months treated with romiplostim had a high response rate (over 90%), with platelet responses occurring quickly (median time to response of 2 weeks) and median number of months with a platelet response of 9 months. To date, 29% of evaluable patients have shown remission (24 weeks of platelet counts ≥50x109/L without any ITP treatment). There were no new safety signals. Updated data from this ongoing study will be presented in the future. Disclosures: Stasi: Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Suppremol: Consultancy. Newland:Geron: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Research Funding. Godeau:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; LFB: Consultancy. Jia:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lopez:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled, ASPIRE Study (TRC114968) of Eltrombopag (EPAG) Treatment of Thrombocytopenia (TCP) in Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Assessment of Clinical Benefit, Safety, and Tolerability

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1661.1661 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1661-1661 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Moshe Mittelman ◽

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

Boris V Afanasyev ◽

Sebastian Grosicki ◽

Raymond SM Wong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Research Funding ◽

Open Label ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Once Daily ◽

Thrombopoietin Receptor ◽

Open Label Extension ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Thrombocytopenia (TCP) is a serious and life-threatening complication of advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Eltrombopag (EPAG), an oral thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, is approved for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura and severe aplastic anemia. Preclinical studies showed that EPAG has potential antileukemic effects. A phase 1 study in advanced MDS/AML demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at doses up to 300 mg, with no worsening of leukemia, and it also showed a trend towards efficacy. Eltrombopag as monotherapy in MDS/AML has not been studied in a randomized fashion. Methods: In Study TRC114968 (ASPIRE), after 8 weeks of open-label, dose-defining EPAG treatment (Study Part 1), patients with highly advanced MDS or AML were randomized 2:1 to EPAG 100-300 mg or placebo (PBO) once daily for 12 weeks (Part 2), then entered a 6-month, open-label extension (Part 3). Patients were stratified by baseline platelet count (<10 Gi/L vs ≥10 Gi/L), and by MDS vs AML. Eligibility included 10-50% baseline bone marrow blasts and a baseline platelet count of <25 Gi/L. The primary endpoint was improvement in the clinically relevant thrombocytopenic event (CRTE) rate during the 12-week double-blind period. CRTE was a composite of a platelet transfusion requirement, significant bleeding event, or platelet count <10 Gi/L. Part 1 results have been presented previously. Blinded results for patients randomized in Part 2 of the study are presented below. Analyses of results by treatment arm, including those for the primary endpoint of CRTE, are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Results: A total of 145 patients were enrolled and randomized. According to WHO criteria, 72 (50%) had MDS and 73 (50%) had AML. See Table 1 for baseline characteristics. The majority of patients (n=91, 63%) were escalated to 300 mg (150 mg for East Asians) once daily. 70 patients (48%) completed the randomized portion of the study, and 58 (40%) entered the open-label extension. Patient disposition is described in Table 2. Out of the 144 treated patients, 97 patients (67%) have died (67 patients in Part 2 and 30 patients in Part 3). The main reasons for withdrawal from the study were adverse events (49 patients, 34%) and progressive disease (39 patients, 27%). The most common adverse events in Part 2 were petechiae, epistaxis, fatigue, pyrexia, and diarrhea. The main serious adverse events in Part 2 were pneumonia, sepsis, and febrile neutropenia. Liver test abnormality occurred in 1 (<1%). The median number of platelet transfusions for both groups was 10. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate EPAG as monotherapy in a randomized fashion in patients with advanced MDS or AML and severe thrombocytopenia. Overall safety was as expected for this patient population with no unexpected adverse events. This study provides evidence for the safety of EPAG in this mostly heavily pretreated patient population. An Independent Response Committee (IRC) is currently assessing responses and disease progression centrally by arm, and final data will be presented at the meeting. Funding: This study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline; eltrombopag is an asset of Novartis AG as of March 2, 2015. Disclosures Mittelman: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Eltrombopag is a once daily oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for treatment of chronic ITP, hepatitis C associated thrombocytopenia, severe aplastic anemia, and pediatric cITP. Data will be presented on use in myeloid malignancies for which eltrombopag is not approved.. Platzbecker:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen, Inc.: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wong:Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Research Funding; Biogen-Idec: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Anagnostopoulos:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Nagler:Novaratis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mannino:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership; GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stone:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chan:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mostafa Kamel:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership; GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Selleslag:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN) in Pediatric Patients with Tagraxofusp, a CD123-Targeted Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150393 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2317-2317

Author(s):

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Branko Cuglievan ◽

Joseph L Lasky ◽

Albert Kheradpour ◽

Nobuko Hijiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell ◽

Case Series ◽

Complete Response ◽

Retrospective Case ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and clinically aggressive hematological malignancy that overexpresses CD123, the interleukin-3 (IL3) receptor alpha subunit. Although BPDCN predominantly affects older adults (median age of 65 years at diagnosis), cases of BPDCN have been reported across all age groups, including infants and children. There is limited data available in the literature on the efficacy and safety of treatments for pediatric patients with BPDCN. Tagraxofusp (TAG, SL-401) is a CD123-directed targeted therapy consisting of recombinant human IL3 linked to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload. A published multicohort prospective study, with prespecified multisystem endpoints, demonstrated the benefit of TAG in adult patients with untreated or relapsed BPDCN. Among the untreated patients, 72% had a complete response and 90% overall response rate; of these patients, 45% were bridged to stem cell transplantation. Adverse events included transaminase elevations, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and capillary leak syndrome (CLS). In a previous case report including 3 pediatric patients with BPDCN, TAG was well-tolerated without significant toxicities and showed encouraging initial clinical responses. TAG was FDA approved in 2018 for BPDCN treatment in adult and pediatric (≥2 years) patients and was recently approved in the EU as monotherapy for first-line treatment in adults. METHODS Here, we report on a multicenter, retrospective case series investigation involving pediatric patients diagnosed with BPDCN at 3 centers in the United States. All patients were treated with TAG according to local institutional guidelines as either first-line treatment (1L) or as a therapy for relapsed/refractory disease (R/R). Data was collected retrospectively via chart review and summarized descriptively. Assessments included tumor response to therapy, survival and safety (adverse events and laboratory abnormalities). RESULTS A total of 6 pediatric patients diagnosed with BPDCN and treated with TAG were included in this analysis. The median age for patients in this study was 15.5 years (range 10 - 21 years), and 4 of the 6 patients were female. Three patients were R/R and received systemic therapy prior to TAG administration, while 3 patients were treatment-naive. Four patients had bone marrow involvement, 2 patients had lymph node involvement, and all 6 patients had skin lesions at diagnosis. All patients received a TAG dose of 12 mcg/kg, with the exception of 1 patient who received 9 mcg/kg. At the time of data cut off, the number of cycles administered ranged from 1 to 4. TAG was well tolerated in these 6 patients. One patient experienced headaches, hot flashes, fatigue, and mouth sores, and low albumin was observed in one patient. No other adverse events were reported and CLS was not observed in these patients. One patient had a complete response to TAG therapy (bone marrow minimal residual disease negative), 2 patients had stable disease, and 3 patients did not have an observed response. In the three 1L patients, one patient had stable disease (no progression after 4 TAG cycles), and 1 patient with extensive disease (skin, bone marrow and central nervous system) had a complete response. Three patients bridged to a stem cell transplant (SCT); 2 were R/R and 1 was 1L. Median survival data for this cohort will be presented (5 of 6 patients remain alive). CONCLUSIONS This multicenter, retrospective case series of 6 pediatric patients with BPDCN expands our base of knowledge of BPDCN treatment in younger individuals. At the time of data cut off for this abstract, TAG, an approved treatment for BPDCN, was well tolerated in all patients. Treatment with TAG was associated with promising efficacy, including half of the patients with responses that allowed for bridging to SCT. Disclosures Pemmaraju: CareDx, Inc.: Consultancy; Plexxicon: Other, Research Funding; Samus: Other, Research Funding; ASH Communications Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptitude Health: Consultancy; Springer Science + Business Media: Other; HemOnc Times/Oncology Times: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy; Dan's House of Hope: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASCO Leukemia Advisory Panel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sager Strong Foundation: Other; Cellectis S.A. ADR: Other, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Other, Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy; Roche Diagnostics: Consultancy; MustangBio: Consultancy, Other; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; LFB Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Clearview Healthcare Partners: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Affymetrix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Research Support, Research Funding; ImmunoGen, Inc: Consultancy; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Hijiya: Novartis: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Durability, Safety and Efficacy of Fitusiran Prophylaxis in People with Hemophilia a or B, with or without Inhibitors - Results from the Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136501 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3-4

Author(s):

Steven W. Pipe ◽

John Pasi ◽

Toshko Lissitchkov ◽

Margaret V. Ragni ◽

Claude Négrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Principal Investigator ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

Scientific Advisory ◽

Open Label Extension

Introduction: Hemophilia is a bleeding disorder characterized by ineffective clot formation due to insufficient thrombin generation. The burden of disease for individuals with hemophilia is high, and less invasive treatment approaches are needed (Machin and Ragni. J Blood Med. 2018). Fitusiran is a once a month subcutaneously administered investigational RNA interference therapeutic targeting antithrombin as a means to improve thrombin generation and promote hemostasis in people with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. A completed Phase I study demonstrated that monthly subcutaneous administration of fitusiran was generally well tolerated and lowered antithrombin in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in increased thrombin generation and decreased bleeding frequency (Pasi et al. New Engl J Med. 2017). The aim of this abstract is to describe long-term durability, safety and efficacy of monthly fitusiran treatment for patients with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors, in the Phase II open-label extension study. Methods: The fitusiran Phase I study (NCT02035605) followed by the Phase II open-label extension study (NCT02554773) included male patients, >18 years of age, with moderate or severe hemophilia A and B, with or without inhibitors. Patients received monthly fixed doses of fitusiran 50 mg or 80 mg subcutaneously. Exploratory post-hoc analysis of bleed events was used to calculate median annualized bleed rate in patients with hemophilia A and B, with or without inhibitors. Results: Thirty-four patients (hemophilia A, n=27 [13 with inhibitors and 14 without inhibitors]; hemophilia B, n=7 [2 with inhibitors and 5 without inhibitors) were enrolled in the Phase 2 open-label extension study, and were treated for up to 4.7 years with a median exposure of approximately 2.6 years (as of March 10, 2020). Once-monthly subcutaneous dosing of fitusiran prophylaxis lowered antithrombin (a reduction of between 85% to 72% from baseline) across patients over a sustained period of time. An exploratory analysis of bleeding events showed an overall median annualized bleed rate of 0.84 during the observation period (see figure). Breakthrough bleeds were managed successfully in accordance with the revised bleed management guidelines for reduced doses of bypassing agents and replacement factors. As of March 10, 2020, fitusiran was generally well tolerated and no anti-drug antibody formation was detected. Conclusions: Monthly fitusiran prophylaxis provided sustained antithrombin lowering in people with hemophilia A and B, with or without inhibitors, resulting in a low annualized bleeding rate over a median of 2.6 years in an open-label extension study. Disclosures Pipe: Medical and Scientific Advisory Council to the National Hemophilia Foundation; Medical Advisory Board to World Federation of Hemophilia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apcintex, Bayer, BioMarin, Catalyst Biosciences, CSL Behring, HEMA Biologics, Freeline, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc., Sangamo Therapeutics, Sanofi, Takeda, Spark Therapeutics, uniQure: Consultancy; Siemens: Research Funding. Pasi:Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees and nonfinancial support; honoraria as member of scientific advisory boards and symposia; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees and nonfinancial support; honoraria as member of scientific advisory boards and symposia; Alnylam (Sanofi): Other: Personal fees and nonfinancial support ; Octapharma: Honoraria, Other: Personal fees and nonfinancial support; honoraria as member of scientific advisory boards and symposia , Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Other: Personal fees and nonfinancial support; honoraria as member of scientific advisory boards and symposia ; Roche: Honoraria, Other; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Tremeau: Research Funding; Sigilon: Research Funding; ApcinteX: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees ; uniQure: Other: Grants and nonfinancial support , Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support; honoraria as member of scientific advisory boards and symposia; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: Personal fees and nonfinancial support; honoraria as member of scientific advisory boards and symposia, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; honoraria as member of scientific advisory boards and symposia . Lissitchkov:CSL Behring: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Bayer: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Novo Nordisk: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Octapharma: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Sanofi: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials ; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecturer; Shire: Other: lecturer; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecturer; Catalyst Biosciences: Other: Principal investigator of clinical trials . Ragni:Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Baxalta/Takeda, BioMarin, Bioverativ, and Spark Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sangamo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alnylam/Sanofi, ATHN, BioMarin, Bioverativ, Sangamo, Spark: Research Funding; Alnylam/Sanofi, BioMarin, Bioverativ, Spark: Consultancy; American Thrombosis Hemostasis Network: Other: Committee work; Baxalta/Takeda, CSL Behring, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, OPKO Biologics, and Vascular Medicine Institute: Research Funding. Négrier:CSL, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Sobi: Other: Travel support; CSL Behring, Octapharma, Shire/Takeda, Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer, Biomarin, CSL Behring, Freeline, LFB, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Sanofi, Shire/Takeda, Sobi, Spark: Consultancy. Yu:Sanofi: Other: was an employee and stockholder of Sanofi, at the time of study; Albireo Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Poloskey:Sanofi: Current Employment. Mei:Sanofi: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Andersson:Sanofi: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text

Ibrutinib and Obinutuzumab in CLL: Improved MRD Response Rates with Substantially Enhanced MRD Depletion for Patients with >1 Year Prior Ibrutinib Exposure

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-181 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 181-181 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Andy Rawstron ◽

Talha Munir ◽

Kristian Brock ◽

Nichola Webster ◽

Samuel Munoz Vicente ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Response Rates ◽

Extension Study ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Anti Cd20 ◽

Support Research

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib inhibits CLL cell proliferation and results in prolonged remission, but MRD responses are rare. Obinutuzumab is a second generation anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is effective in CLL and can result in MRD responses. In the IcICLLe study (ISRCTN12695354), 40 participants with CLL requiring treatment (20 treatment-naïve, 20 with relapsed/refractory [R/R] disease) received ibrutinib until complete remission with <0.01% Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in the bone marrow or disease progression. The IcICLLe Extension Study expanded IcICLLe to examine the efficacy and safety of the combination of obinutuzumab and ibrutinib in 40 patients with R/R CLL, of which 10/40 had received prior ibrutinib on the IcICLLe trial. Initial results after 1 month of combination treatment indicated that adding obinutuzumab to ibrutinib improved CLL depletion, and 18 month follow-up data is now available. Aim: to determine the MRD response rates for patients with R/R CLL treated with ibrutinib and obinutuzumab in ibrutinib-naïve trial participants compared to those treated with >1 year prior ibrutinib. Patients: The IcICLLe Extension Study recruited 40 participants with relapsed/refractory CLL requiring treatment. They received continuous ibrutinib (420mg OD) with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab given over 6 months (M). Ten participants had >1 year of prior ibrutinib monotherapy in IcICLLe and 30 were ibrutinib-naïve with obinutuzumab started 24 hours after first ibrutinib dose. Patient characteristics and Adverse Events (AEs, collected from registration until 30 days after treatment cessation and reported at 1, 3, and 6M, and 6-monthly thereafter using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0) are shown in Table 1. MRD assessment was performed according to ERIC guidelines with a maximum detection limit of 0.001%/10-5. Results: In the 20 R/R patients treated with ibrutinib monotherapy there were no IWCLL CR/CRi responses and no patients achieved <0.01% CLL in the PB or BM at the 6 month response assessment. PB MRD levels either remained stable or improved at subsequent timepoints, with 1/20 achieving <0.01% PB MRD at 18M. The addition of obinutuzumab did not have a discernible impact on safety but was associated with a higher response rates and greater depth of MRD depletion than observed in patients treated with ibrutinib monotherapy, particularly in patients who had received ibrutinib for >1 year prior to combination with obinutuzumab (see Table 1). Patients receiving obinutuzumab after >1 year prior ibrutinib monotherapy achieved a higher response rate compared to ibrutinib-naive patients (IWCLL CR/CRi 50% vs. 30%), with a higher proportion of patients achieving <0.01% BM MRD (50% vs. 6%) and a greater depth of disease depletion (3.1 vs. 1.5 log reduction). PB MRD levels continued to improve in ibrutinib-naïve patients after cessation of obinutuzumab with 30% (9/30 with 4/30 inevaluable) achieving PB MRD <0.01% rate at 12 months post-obinutuzumab, compared to 60% (6/10 with 2/10 inevaluable) of patients at the same timepoint (12 months post-obinutuzumab) who had received ibrutinib for >1 year prior to starting obinutuzumab. The difference in extent of disease depletion observed with obinutuzumab may be related to the pre-obinutuzumab disease bulk because the majority of patients (7/10) with >1 year prior ibrutinib treatment had already resolved any lymphadenopathy prior to receiving obinutuzumab. Conclusions: The results suggest that the addition of obinutuzumab to ibrutinib may result in a substantial improvement in the depletion of CLL cells from the PB and BM for ibrutinib-naïve patients. However, a greater impact in MRD response rate and depth of depletion was seen when obinutuzumab was introduced after >1 year of ibrutinib treatment and tumour bulk was low. For patients with persistent disease during/ following pathway inhibition treatments, the addition of anti-CD20 antibody therapy may be effective at improving MRD response rates. Disclosures Rawstron: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BD Bio-sciences: Research Funding; Beckman Coulter: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Munir:MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Brock:GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; Merck Sharp Dohme: Other: Reimbursement of conference fees; Roche: Other: Reimbursement of expenses; Lilly: Honoraria. Pettitt:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; GSK/Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Napp: Research Funding. Fox:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees and non-financial support, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sunesis: Consultancy. Devereux:Janssen: Other: Personal fees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fegan:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Napp: Honoraria. Bloor:Janssen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Hillmen:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Randomized Open Label Pilot Study of Clostridium Butyricum Miyairi 588 (CBM588) in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153821 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 334-334

Author(s):

Karamjeet S. Sandhu ◽

Dongyun Yang ◽

Sally Mokhtari ◽

Sanjeet S Dadwal ◽

Vinod A. Pullarkat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Gut Microbiome ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Study Drug ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

And Control ◽

To Receive

Abstract The gut microbiota plays an important role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis by regulating the maturation of the mucosal immune system, which constitutes an immune barrier for the integrity of the intestinal tract. In recent years, the role of the human GI microbiota in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and other outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been increasingly evaluated in observational studies. However, there have been limited interventional trials specifically designed to alter the microbiota of HCT recipients. CBM588 (clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588) is a novel Live Biotherapeutic Product (LBP) that produces short chain organic acids, mainly butyric acid, which plays a key role in the maintenance of colonic homeostasis by regulating fluid and electrolyte uptake, epithelial cell growth, and inflammatory responses. In this pilot trial (NCT03922035) we sought to determine the safety, feasibility, biologic activities, and preliminary efficacy of CBM588 in HCT recipients. Patients age ≥18 years, scheduled to undergo HCT from an 8/8 or 7/8 matched related/unrelated donor with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) were eligible. Following the patient safety lead-in (SLI; n=6), 30 patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive either standard peri-transplant supportive care alone (control arm) or with CBM588 (treatment arm, open label) at the fixed dose of 160 mg orally (2x/day) from day -8 or hospital admission until day +28 or discharge (figure 1). Patients received prophylactic antibiotics per intuitional SOPs. Study objectives were to evaluate the safety/feasibility of CBM588 (Primary), and to compare the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE), HCT outcomes including GVHD, and gut microbiome diversity between the Treatment and Control arms. Feasibility was defined as the ability to consume CDM588 for 14 days during the SLI phase. For microbiome analysis, we isolated DNA from weekly collected stool samples, and amplified the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene from each total DNA sample. Between April, 2018 and January, 2020, we enrolled 36 patients (20 were female) at the median age of 66 years (range: 34-77). The indication for HCT was Leukemias (n=22), MDS (n=5), lymphoma (n=3), myeloma (n=3), or other (n=3). All but one patient received fludarabine/melphalan-based RIC and tacrolimus/sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis. Graft source was peripheral blood stem cell from a matched related (n=13) or unrelated (n=23) donor (Table 1). One patient assigned to the Treatment arm declined to receive CBM588 before the first dose; but remained on the study with clinical data/biospecimen collections and safety/feasibility/biologic endpoints were analyzed as treated for this patient. All the other patients who were assigned to the treatment arm (n=21, including the patients in SLI segment) were able to take the prescribed study drug; with the median 52 doses (range: 0-55), and 19 of 21 subjects (90.5%) consumed at least 14 days of the study drug. There were no serious adverse events (SAE) related to CBM588. The overall AEs and infection- or GI-specific AEs were similar between the Treatment and Control arms. All but one patient (who died of sepsis in the Control arm - on day 8) engrafted with a median of 15 days for neutrophils. The 100-day non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 0% in the Treatment and 6.7% in the Control arm. According to the intent-to-treat principle, acute GVHD (grade 2-4) was observed in 4 of 15 patients in the Treatment arm and 5 of 15 in the Control arm. The lower GI GVHD was seen in 2 patients in the Treatment and 4 in the control arm. As treated analyses showed the overall grade 2-4 GVHD in 3 of 14 (21.4%) with the use of CBM588 and 6 of 16 (37.5%) without CBM588 (one case of lower GI GVHD with CBM, 5 cases without; (Table 2). The Shannon Diversity Index was similar between the two groups at each time point tested. (Figure 1). However, had favorable microbial profile was detected as the pathogens Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridium baratii, and Clostridiodes difficile were reduced in the treatment group. (Figure 2) In summary, our data demonstrate the feasibility and safety of CBM588 administration during the peri-transplant period, which was associated with an intended biologic impact on the gut microbiome, and an early favorable sign of GI-GVHD incidence and HCT outcomes in this older population who underwent RIC HCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dadwal: Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Aseptiscope: Consultancy; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; AlloVir: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: Investigator; Karius: Other: Investigator. Pullarkat: AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Dova, and Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Al Malki: CareDx: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Ali: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Artz: Radiology Partners: Other: Spouse has equity interest in Radiology Partners, a private radiology physician practice. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau. Budde: Roche: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Merck, Inc: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Mustang Bio, Inc: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding. Popplewell: Hoffman La Roche: Other: Food; Pfizer: Other: Travel; Novartis: Other: Travel. Marcucci: Novartis: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Agios: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Abbvie: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings. Forman: Lixte Biotechnology: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Mustang Bio: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Allogene: Consultancy.

Download Full-text