Identification Of aHUS and Complement Mutations In Patients Presenting With Acute Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1073-1073
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H Phillips ◽  
John Connolly ◽  
John-Paul Westwood ◽  
Siobhan McGuckin ◽  
Daniel P Gale ◽  
...  

Abstract Increasing understanding of abnormalities within the alternative complement pathway in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is changing the way the disease is both diagnosed and treated. It is rarely possible to definitively diagnose aHUS at the time of initial acute presentation and treatment, with plasma exchange, is initiated on clinical grounds. With the risk of further acute episodes and increasing availability of terminal complement inhibitors accurate molecular diagnosis is imperative. Aim to determine the clinical phenotype and nature of complement abnormalities within a cohort of aHUS patients referred to a large thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) referral centre. Patients and methods Data from 14 patients with a clinical diagnosis of aHUS was retrospectively analysed. 13 patients were referred with thrombotic microangiopathy not initially requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). 1 patient presented to another institution requiring urgent RRT and was subsequently transferred to our care following recovery of renal function. All patients had ADAMTS13 levels above 30% and negative anti-ADAMTS13 antibody levels at presentation to exclude a diagnosis of TTP. 3 patients had diarrhoea at presentation; all were enterotoxin negative. Patients were subsequently assessed for mutations within complement factors H (CFH), I (CFI), B (CFB), C3 and membrane cofactor protein (MCP), at risk haplotypes and CFH antibodies. A control group of 14 acute acquired TTP patients with confirmed ADAMTS13 levels <5% were assessed for the same abnormalities within complement regulatory proteins. Results In the aHUS cohort, the median age of presentation was 25.5 years (11 months to 72 years). The median serum creatinine was 275 µmol/l (range 79-1812 µmol/l), platelet count 27 x109/l (10-115) and LDH was 2016 IU (342-4621). In the TTP group, presenting creatinine was 106 µmol/l (61-353) µmol/l, platelets 13 x109/l (5-74) and LDH 1954 IU (756-3518). aHUS precipitants at initial presentation or relapse included pregnancy (n=2), upper respiratory tract infection (n=6), vaccination (n=1), abdominal sepsis (n=4). In 3 cases, there was no identified trigger. Headache was a common presenting symptom; only one hypertensive patient (72 years) had a transient ischemic attack; no other neurological events were documented in the aHUS group. In 57% (8/14 patients) variants of the alternative complement pathway were identified; 5 with MCP mutations, encoding p.R59X, p.C157Y (present in 2 brothers), p.C64F and c.286+2T>C/c.286+2T>G (both present in the same patient); 2 with CFH mutations, encoding c.3134-5T>C and p.R1215X; and 1 with a CFB mutation (p.D371G). All of the mutations identified, except CFH c.3134-5T>C, are of clear functional significance. 2 of the patients with MCP mutations had a normal serum creatinine at presentation. C3/4 levels were low in 3/8 patients. In the control group of TTP patients with ADAMTS13 <5% no complement mutations were identified. 13/14 aHUS patients were treated initially with plasma exchange; 1 received eculizumab subsequently. 3 patients required temporary RRT and 1 died within 24 hours of presentation with progressive cardiorespiratory failure. At follow-up, all patients had platelet counts >150 x109/l and 12/13 had normal serum creatinine levels; one patient had a creatinine of 122 µmol/l. 5/13 patients had recurrent episodes, 4 of whom had confirmed complement pathway abnormalities (3 MCP mutated, 1 CFB mutated). None required long-term RRT or progressed to end-stage renal failure (ESRD) at a median follow-up of 2 years (range 0.25-28 years). Conclusions This aHUS cohort, without ESRD, demonstrates the difficulty in clinically differentiating TTP from complement mediated TMAs. We demonstrate that diagnostic differentiation based on platelet count, renal function and serum C3/C4 levels is insufficient to predict an underlying complement mutation. This distinction is increasingly important with the proven efficacy of complement inhibitor therapy in targeting complement activation in aHUS. Specifically, we demonstrate a very high frequency of functionally significant MCP mutations which mimic relapsing/remitting TTP. An ADAMTS13 activity >5% in a patient with a TMA should necessitate genetic screening for complement gene mutations prior to consideration of complement inhibitor therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. J. Hoste ◽  
J. Damen ◽  
R. C. Vanholder ◽  
N. H. Lameire ◽  
J. R. Delanghe ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobien C. Verhave ◽  
Pierre Fesler ◽  
Jean Ribstein ◽  
Guilhem du Cailar ◽  
Albert Mimran

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahdi Sagheb ◽  
Soha Namazi ◽  
Bita Geramizadeh ◽  
Amin Karimzadeh ◽  
Mohammad Bagher Oghazian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Temesgen Fiseha ◽  
Tizita Mengesha ◽  
Rahel Girma ◽  
Edosa Kebede ◽  
Angesom Gebreweld

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 2460-2462
Author(s):  
Seher Abdurasool Almedeny ◽  
Jabbar Yasir AL- Mayah ◽  
Mohanmed S. Abdulzahra ◽  
Najah R. Hadi

The aim: To evaluate the effect of single daily 25 mg of spironolactone on serum electrolytes and kidney function tests in patients with severe chronic left sided heart failure. Materials and methods: 60 patients with severe chronic left sided heart failure were enrolled in this study and they were divided in to 2 equal groups’ one group with standard therapy of HF and the other with spironolactone in a dose of 25 mg / day, as an additive therapy to the standard one. Serum electrolytes and kidney function tests were assessed at the beginning of the study and after 3 months. Results: A significant increment in serum potassium (p<0.05) was observed in the spironolactone group after 3 months treatment, while no significant reduction in serum sodium (p>0.05) and no significant increase in serum creatinine and blood urea (p>0.05) was noticed in the same group, control group showed no significant changes (p>0.05), in both serum electrolytes (S.K and S.Na) and renal function tests (S.C and B.U). Conclusions: Spironolactone caused a significant elevation of serum potassium level but this elevation is still with the clinically accepted ranges when low dose of spironolactone is used and with intact renal function. Serum creatinine level was not significantly increased with 25 mgl day of spironolactone. We conclude that Renal function tests namely blood urea and serum Creatinine, and serum potassium should be closely monitored in patients on spironolactone therapy especially those patients who use ACEI and ARBs in addition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Escamilla Cabrera Beatriz ◽  
Nuria Victoria Sánchez Dorta ◽  
Natalia Negrã­n Mena ◽  
Sergio Luis-Lima ◽  
Federico Gonzalez Rinne ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Serum creatinine is the most used biomarker of renal function in clinical practice. However, the correlation between creatinine and measured GFR is poor with a variability as wide as 200%. The causes of this phenomena are not clear. Some studies observed tubular handling (reabsorption and secretion) as well as intestinal secretion of creatinine, and depends of nutritional status . Importantly, these changes increased with the loss of renal function, masking changes in the evolution of real renal function. However, scarce evidence is available about the reliability of creatinine in reflecting the changes of renal function over the time in predialysis patients, compared to measured GFR. This information is relevant in the setting of clinical decisions. Method Spanish unicenter study developed at the Hospital Universitario de Canarias (Tenerife). In the pre-dialysis outpatient clinic, subjects are followed with measured GFR (clearance of iohexol by DBS). Measured GFR is performed at baseline and repeated as suggested by the clinical evolution. For this study we included all patients with repeated determinations of creatinine and measured GFR. The changes of creatinine in terms of increase (&gt;10%), decrease (&lt;10%) and stability (±10%) were compared with the changes in measured GFR. Results 89 cases with repeated measurement of GFR and creatinine were evaluated. In 61 cases (68.53%) discrepancies between changes in creatinine and measured GFR were evident. Graphic 1 shows differents discordancing cases with 39 cases (43.8%) overestimation, 7 (7.8%) of infraestimation and 15 cases (24.7%) not change of mGFR with changes on Cr. Conclusion Changes in creatinine do not reflect real changes in real renal function in about 70% of the cases. Whenever possible, the measurement of GFR by whichever method available should be considered in the renal care and follow-up of these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document