Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms: Report Of The Italian Network On Secondary Leukemias

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2659-2659
Author(s):  
Luana Fianchi ◽  
Maria Teresa Voso ◽  
Anna Candoni ◽  
Gianluca Gaidano ◽  
Marianna Criscuolo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In 2001, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) as a distinct entity including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodisplastic syndromes (MDS). At present, about 10% of all AML patients have a previous history of exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiation for a primary malignancy or autoimmune disease. In 2009, we initiated a Web-based epidemiological registry, with the purpose of collecting t-MN diagnosed at Italian Hematological or Oncological Divisions. Methods Demographic and clinical information on t-MN patients were included in the database whose access was restricted to selected users and was password-protected. Between May 2009 and June 2013, 279 t-MN patients [121 males and 158 females; median age 64 years (range 23-88 years)], observed at 22 Italian Centers between 1999 and 2012, were registered in the web-database. Results The primary malignancy (PM) was a hematological neoplasm (HM) in 123 cases (44%), a solid tumor in 145 cases (52%), and an autoimmune disease in 11 patients (4%). Twenty patients (7%) had a history of two or more previous cancers. Among hematological malignancies, the most frequent PM were lymphoproliferative diseases (92/122 cases), while breast cancer (65/146 cases) was the most frequent primary solid tumor. In particular, hematological PM were: 92 lymphoprolipherative diseases (68 Non Hodgkin and 18 Hodgkin lymphoma, 6 chronic lymphocytic leukemia); 12 Multiple myeloma; 14 myeloproliferative neoplasms (7 Myelofibrosis; 3 polycitemia vera; 3 essential thrombocythemia; 1 Hypereosinophilic syndrome.); 1 Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; 4 Acute myeloid leukemia (acute promielocytic leukemia in 2 cases). Sites of primary solid tumors were: 65 Breast; 32 Uro-genital (14 prostate; 5 bladder; 8 uterus; 5 ovarium); 17 Colon-rectal; 8 Lung; 8 Thyroid; 15 others (2 stomach; 5 CNS; 2 skin, 4 oropharynx; 2 sarcoma). Eleven patients had previously received immunosuppressive therapy for an autoimmune disease (5 with mitoxantrone, 5 with methotrexate, 1 with chlorambucil). Two-hundred-thirty-six patients had previously received chemotherapy for their primary malignancy, associated to radiotherapy (RT) in 94 cases. RT represented the only primary treatment in 43 cases. Median latency between PM and t-MN was 5.6 years (range 0.5-48). There were no differences between t-MN after lymphoprolipherative diseases or after breast cancer when considering patients’ age (p=0.09) or median latency (p 0.20) between PM and t-MN. According to morphology, t-MN were classified as 164 AML, 108 MDS and 7 ALL. Karyotype was available for 204 patients and was unfavorable in 81 patients (complex in 54 patients including del(7) in 19 cases; 15 cases with isolated del(7)]. A recurrent chromosomal translocation was present in 13 patients [1 t(8;21), 8 t(15;17) and 1 inv(16); 3 t(9;22)], while 75 patients had a normal karyotype. One-hundred-thirty-five patients received chemotherapy for t-MN, while the hypomethylating drug Azacitidine was administered to 63 patients. Fifty-six patients underwent bone marrow transplantation (45 allogeneic and 11 autologous). Median OS from the t-MN diagnosis was 7.7 months (range 0.2-158+). Conclusions The incidence of t-MN is rising as a result of the increasing number of cancer survivors. Lymphoprolipherative diseases and breast cancer are the most common primary malignancies at risk of developing a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. Disclosures: Santini: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen : Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; gsk: Honoraria.

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1235-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Alexis Ogdie ◽  
Elizabeth O. Hexner ◽  
Noelle V. Frey ◽  
Alison W. Loren ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun Gupta ◽  
Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽  
Harris V. Naina

Although rare, clinicians and patients must be aware that therapy related malignancies, specifically acute myeloid leukemia (AML), can occur as a complication of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Vigilance for signs and symptoms is appropriate. AML with t (8;16) is a specific translocation leading to formation of a fusion protein (MYST3/CREBBP). TheMYST3/CREBBPAML tends to develop within 2 years of adjuvant chemotherapy, especially for breast cancer, without preceding myelodysplasia. It usually presents with disseminated intravascular coagulation and osteolytic lesions and has a poor prognosis despite aggressive resuscitation and therapy. With the increasing use of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, we are seeing a definite increase in the incidence of therapy related myelodysplastic syndromes and AML. One must keep this complication in mind while counseling and following up breast cancer patients who have received adjuvant chemotherapy. New osteolytic bone lesions in a patient with history of breast cancer do not necessarily mean metastatic disease and should be fully evaluated.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Ali ◽  
Batool Yassin ◽  
Ali Almothaffar

Background: Studies demonstrated that there are several germline mutations that lead to a familial predisposition for acute myeloid leukemia and Myelodysplastic syndrome. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the minimum cancer family history was defined as including first- and second-degree family history, type of primary cancer, and age at diagnosis. The current study aimed to estimate the frequency of positive family history for hematologic and solid malignancies in patients with Myeloid Neoplasms / Aplastic anemia. Patients and Methods: A cross-section study was carried out at the Center of Blood Diseases, Medical City Campus during the period from March-December 2020. A purposeful sample of all adult patients with Myeloid Neoplasms [Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, and Aplastic Anemia] was included in the study. A data collection form was prepared, based on the Hereditary Hematopoietic Malignancies Screening form adopted by the University of Chicago, and modified by the researchers; The data were collected by direct interview with the patients. Patients with hematologic malignancy and one or more first-degree relatives, or ≥2 second-degree relatives, with hematologic malignancies and individuals with Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia and two first or second-degree relatives with a diagnosis of solid tumor malignancy, were considered potential carriers of such genetic predisposition. Results: A total of 153 patients were included; males were nearly equal to females with a male to female ratio of nearly 1:1. Acute Myeloid Leukemia was found in 57.5%, Aplastic Anemia was found in 19%, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 17% and only four patients (6.5%) were known cases of Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Nine patients (5.9%) reported a family history of hematological malignancies, 29 (19.0%) reported a family history of solid malignancies and only one patient reported a family history of both hematological and solid malignancies. Regarding the official medical reports of the patients, no patient had been interviewed properly about this crucial point. Conclusion: Positive family history for hematological and solid malignancies in Iraqi patients with myeloid neoplasms is prevalent. Our current approach to this critical issue in Iraq needs to be re-considered.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 934-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Bullinger ◽  
Konstanze Döhner ◽  
Hartmut Döhner

In recent years, our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of myeloid neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), has been greatly advanced by genomics discovery studies that use novel high-throughput sequencing techniques. AML, similar to most other cancers, is characterized by multiple somatically acquired mutations that affect genes of different functional categories, a complex clonal architecture, and disease evolution over time. Patterns of mutations seem to follow specific and temporally ordered trajectories. Mutations in genes encoding epigenetic modifiers, such as DNMT3A, ASXL1, TET2, IDH1, and IDH2, are commonly acquired early and are present in the founding clone. The same genes are frequently found to be mutated in elderly individuals along with clonal expansion of hematopoiesis that confers an increased risk for the development of hematologic cancers. Furthermore, such mutations may persist after therapy, lead to clonal expansion during hematologic remission, and eventually lead to relapsed disease. In contrast, mutations involving NPM1 or signaling molecules (eg, FLT3, RAS) typically are secondary events that occur later during leukemogenesis. Genetic data are now being used to inform disease classification, risk stratification, and clinical care of patients. Two new provisional entities, AML with mutated RUNX1 and AML with BCR- ABL1, have been included in the current update of the WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and AML, and mutations in three genes— RUNX1, ASXL1, and TP53—have been added in the risk stratification of the 2017 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for AML. Integrated evaluation of baseline genetics and assessment of minimal residual disease are expected to further improve risk stratification and selection of postremission therapy. Finally, the identification of disease alleles will guide the development and use of novel molecularly targeted therapies.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1364-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Kelda Gardner ◽  
Genevieve Alcorn ◽  
Mary-Elizabeth M. Percival ◽  
...  

Background: Optimal treatment for medically less fit adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains uncertain. Retrospective data suggest intensive therapy may lead to better outcomes in these patients. However, these findings must be interpreted cautiously because of the possibility of selection bias and other confounders. Ideally, the optimal treatment intensity is defined via randomized trial but whether patients and their physicians are amenable to such a study is unknown. We therefore designed a trial (NCT03012672) to 1) evaluate the feasibility of randomization between intensive and non-intensive therapy in this population and 2) examine the impact of treatment intensity on response rate and survival. We used CLAG-M as high-dose cytarabine-based intensive induction therapy. Rather than selecting different classes of drugs in the 2 treatment arms- which may have different modes of action and therefore confound the question of treatment intensity - we used reduced-dose ("mini") CLAG-M as the non-intensive comparator. Methods: Adults ≥18 years were eligible if they had untreated AML or high-grade myeloid neoplasms (≥10% blasts in blood or marrow) and were medically less fit as defined by having a "treatment related mortality" (TRM) score of ≥13.1, corresponding to a >10-15% 28-day mortality with intensive chemotherapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% was the only organ function exclusion. Patient-physician pairs were first asked if they were amenable to randomized treatment allocation. If so, they were randomized 1:1 to mini- vs. regular-dose CLAG-M. If not, in order to evaluate our secondary endpoints, the patient or physician could choose the treatment arm and still enroll on study. Patients and physicians then completed surveys elucidating their decision-making processes. Up to 2 induction courses were given with mini- vs. regular-dose CLAG-M: cladribine 2 or 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), cytarabine 100 or 2,000 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), G-CSF 300 or 480µcg/day for weight </≥76kg in both arms (days 0-5), and mitoxantrone 6 or 18 mg/m2/day (days 1-3). CLAG at identical doses was used for post-remission therapy for up to 4 (regular-dose CLAG) or 12 (mini-CLAG) cycles. The primary endpoint was feasibility of randomization, defined as ≥26/50 of patient-physician pairs agreeing to randomization. Secondary outcomes included rate of complete remission (CR) negative for measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD), rate of CR plus CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR+CRi), and overall survival (OS). Results: This trial enrolled 33 patients. Only 3 (9%) patient/physician pairs agreed to randomization and thus randomization was deemed infeasible (primary endpoint). Eighteen pairs chose mini-CLAG-M and 12 regular-dose CLAG-M for a total of 19 subjects in the lower dose and 14 subjects in the higher dose arms. The decision favoring lower dose treatment was made largely by the physician in 5/18 (28%) cases, the patient in 11/18 (61%) cases and both in 2/18 (11%). The decision favoring the higher dose arm was made by the patient in most cases 9/12 (75%), both physician and patient in 2/12 (16%) and the physician in only 1/12 (8%) cases. Despite the limitations of lack of randomization, patients' baseline characteristics were well balanced with regard to age, performance status, TRM score, lab values and cytogenetic/mutational risk categories (Table 1). One patient was not yet evaluable for response or TRM at data cutoff. Rates of MRDneg CR were comparable: 6/19 (32%) in the lower and 3/14 (21%) in the higher dose groups (p=0.70). CR+CRi rates were also similar in both arms (43% vs. 56% in lower vs. higher dose arms; p=0.47). Three (16%) patients experienced early death in the lower dose arm vs. 1 (7%) in the higher dose arm (p=0.43). With a median follow up of 4.2 months, there was no survival difference between the two groups (median OS of 6.1 months in the lower vs. 4.7 months in the higher dose arm; p=0.81; Figure 1). Conclusions: Randomization of medically unfit patients to lower- vs. higher-intensity therapy was not feasible, and physicians rarely chose higher intensity therapy in this patient group. Acknowledging the limitation of short follow-up time and small sample size, our trial did not identify significant differences in outcomes between intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy. Analysis of differences in QOL and healthcare resource utilization between groups is ongoing. Disclosures Halpern: Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Othus:Celgene: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. Gardner:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Percival:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Nohla Therapeutics: Research Funding. Scott:Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Becker:AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glycomimetics, Invivoscribe, JW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Trovagene: Research Funding; Accordant Health Services/Caremark: Consultancy; The France Foundation: Honoraria. Oehler:Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy. Walter:BioLineRx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Argenx BVBA: Consultancy; BiVictriX: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Covagen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Race Oncology: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; New Link Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Cladribine is FDA-approved for Hairy Cell Leukemia. Here we describe its use for AML, where is is also widely used with prior publications supporting its use


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 829-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safaa M. Ramadan ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Marian J.P.L. Stevens-Kroef ◽  
Roelof Willemze ◽  
Sergio Amadori ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) describes patients (pts) with a history of malignant or non-malignant disease or AML secondary to environmental, occupational or therapeutic exposures. They are generally associated with poor outcome despite the use of intensive treatments. The impact of clinical features and type of treatment on pts' outcome is still not well established. In the current analysis we evaluated sAML pts who were treated in 13 EORTC collaborative trials conducted between May 1986 and January 2008. sAML pts in the database were pooled to characterize clinical features of the disease and evaluate changes in survival over these years (yrs). Method Main selection criteria were AML with bone marrows blasts ≥20% and documented history of prior malignancy, non-malignant disease and/or toxic exposure. AML-M3 and MDS without confirmed diagnosis ≥2 months before AML were excluded. All pts were eligible for standard treatment. Induction regimens were anthracycline and AraC based: 7+3, including etoposide, intensified with high dose (HD)-AraC randomized to standard doses (SD) in younger (AML12) or gemtuzumab ozogamicin in elderly pts. Consolidation regimens were age adapted. In mid-1980s, autologous transplant was tested vs a 2nd consolidation cycle (AML8A) in pts ≤45 yrs and thereafter used systematically in pts ≤60 yrs without available donor. Allogeneic transplant (Allo-SCT) was offered to pts ≤46 yrs with HLA-compatible sibling since mid-1980s and expanded in the last decade to pts up to 59 yrs. Selected pts were divided into 3 sAML cohorts, cohort A after MDS, cohort B after other malignant diseases and cohort C after non-malignant conditions and/or toxic exposure. Results Of 8858 pts enrolled in the 13 evaluated studies, 962 were sAML. Median age was 63 yrs (range 16-85), 413 were young (≤60 yrs) and 549 were elderly (≥61 yrs); 54% were males. Cohort A consisted of 509 pts (median age 64 yrs), cohort B of 362 pts (median age 59 yrs) and cohort C of 91 pts (median age 61 yrs). In cohort B, breast cancer (24%) and lymphoma (14%) were the most frequent primary tumors. Autoimmune diseases represented 22% of non-malignant conditions. In young pts, complete remissions (CR/CRi) rate was 59%; 55% in SD-AraC vs 89% in HD-AraC treated pts. Allo-SCT in CR1 was performed in 21% of all pts. The Allo-SCT rate increased from 5% before 1990, 20% in 1990-1999 to 25% from 2000 (20% in SD-AraC vs 31% of HD-AraC treated pts). CR/CRi was achieved in 45% of elderly pts. Median follow-up was 6 yrs. Median overall-survival (OS) was 14.5 months in young and 9 months in elderly pts. The 5-yr OS was 28% and 7% respectively. Five-yr OS was 11% in cohort A and 22% in both cohort B and C. Treatment outcome of younger pts according to disease features and treatment type over time in cohort A and B are detailed in table 1 & 2. Using Cox model stratified by cohort age, gender, WBC, risk group, year of treatment and HD-AraC were independent prognostic factors for OS. In the AML12 study, compared to denovo pts, sAML pts ≤45 yrs had worse outcome if treated with SD-AraC whereas a better OS was seen if treated with HD-AraC. In elderly pts only the good/intermediate risk group of cohort B had a relatively better 5-yr OS (15%). Conclusions The outcome of sAML in younger pts has improved over the yrs in parallel with HD-AraC introduction in induction of remission. HD-AraC should be considered for younger pts with sAML. Disclosures: Ramadan: Alwaleed Bin Talal Foundation : A research funding is under advanced negotiation with the foundation Other. Suciu:Alwaleed Bin Talal Foundation : A research funding is under advanced negotiation with the foundation Other. Meert:Alwaleed Bin Talal Foundation : A research funding is under advanced negotiation with the foundation Other. de Schaetzen:Alwaleed Bin Talal Foundation : A research funding is under advanced negotiation with the foundation Other Other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document