Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Alone Is Equivalent To Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone With Autologous Stem Cell Transplant In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Study Results Of a Randomized Trial

Abstract The current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) aged less than 65 years is high-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) based on improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with conventional chemotherapy. The introduction of novel agents, for example lenalidomide and bortezomib over the last decade, has substantially improved MM outcomes providing similar response rates to ASCT. As a consequence, the role of upfront ASCT has become more controversial. Therefore, this randomized clinical trial aims to determine the role of upfront ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM patients receiving lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as induction therapy. Patients enrolled into the study were aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed MM, transplant eligible, and meeting CRAB criteria. Patients were randomized to receive 4 cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg days 1–21) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22) followed by ASCT conditioned with 200 mg/m2 melphalan (Arm A; LD+ASCT) or 8 cycles of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Arm B; LD alone). Both groups received lenalidomide maintenance therapy 10-15 mg for up to 2 years. Patients in both treatment arms received stem cell collection after 4 cycles of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone if at least a partial response was achieved. Patients with stable disease or progressive disease (PD) went off study. The primary objective was to compare the best response between patients treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone followed by ASCT and patients treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone alone. Secondary objectives were to compare the duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS between the two treatment arms and to evaluate the secondary malignancies in both arms. Fifty patients with newly diagnosed MM were randomized between February 2008 and May 2013, and 47 patients were eligible for evaluation in this interim analysis; 25 patients randomized to Arm A (LD+ASCT) and 22 patients randomized to Arm B (LD alone). Overall, patients had a median age of 61.6 years (range 48–75), 60% were male, 34% ISS Stage I, 49% ISS Stage II, 17% ISS Stage III. The data were analyzed according to the IMWG response criteria (Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4691-5). In an intention-to-treat analysis, there was a trend towards improved overall response rate (ORR) in patients receiving LD+ASCT (96%) compared with patients receiving LD alone (77%; p=0.08) (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 36.8 months (range 1.1–62.7), the median DOR was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0–34.1) in the LD+ASCT group compared with 21.2 months (95% CI 11.0–22.9) in the LD group. Overall, 18 patients have PD (10 patients in the LD+ASCT arm and 8 patients in LD arm), and 8 patients have died (4 patents in the LD+ASCT arm and 4 patients in the LD arm). Median PFS for LD+ASCT versus LD was 17.0 months (95% CI 15.5–not estimable) versus 25.2 months (95% CI 9.0–not estimable; p=0.94). Median OS for LD+ASCT versus LD was 57.6 months (95% CI 48.0–not estimable) versus not reached (p=0.94). Two patients in the LD alone arm developed a secondary malignancy, including 1 patient with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) 13 months after the start of therapy. This interim analysis of an ongoing randomized clinical study comparing lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone induction with and without upfront ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM suggests that addition of ASCT resulted in a trend towards improved ORR. This did not result in a significant difference in terms of PFS or OS between the two treatment arms. In contrast there was a trend of better DOR in the LD alone arm. The data show that LD alone can achieve similar results as LD+ASCT, however careful interpretation is required due to the low patient number and relatively short follow-up. The incidence of secondary malignancy was low, including the development of 1 MDS. Disclosures: Schecter: Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mapara:Celgene: Research Funding, RO1 Other. Lentzsch:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone with and without Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Study Results,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4142.4142 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4142-4142 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Lijun Dai ◽

Amy O'Sullivan ◽

Ryan Kennedy ◽

Mohammad Abbas ◽

Yongli Shuai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Low Dose ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4142 Introduction: High dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as opposed to conventional chemotherapy improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM) and is currently the standard of care for newly diagnosed MM patients less than 65 years old. Over the last decade, novel agents such as lenalidomide or bortezomib have dramatically improved MM outcomes with similar response rates as ASCT and the role of upfront ASCT has become more controversial. Therefore the goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the role of upfront ASCT in newly diagnosed myeloma patients receiving novel agent lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone induction. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with newly confirmed, measurable MM in stage 2 and 3 (Salmon Durie) and meeting CRAB criteria were enrolled. Patients were randomized to transplant (Arm A) or to non-transplant (Arm B). Patients in Arm A received 4 cycles of lenalidomide (25mg days 1 – 21) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40mg days 1,8,15,22) followed by ASCT conditioned with 200 mg/m2 melphalan (LD+ASCT); Arm B patients received 8 cycles of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (LD alone). Both arms received stem cell collection after 4 cycles of therapy if patients achieved at least a partial remission (PR). Patients with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) went off study. The primary objective was to compare best response. The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and evaluation of secondary malignancies in both arms. Results: From February 2008 to May 2011, 44 patients with newly diagnosed MM were randomized. The patient characteristics were as follow: median age of the patients was 61.7 years (range 48∼75), 45.5% female and 55.5% male patients, ISS stage I 31%, II 51% and III 18%. 40 patients were eligible for evaluation and 20 patients were randomized to Arm A or Arm B, respectively. The data were analyzed according to latest IMWG response criteria (Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4691–5). In an intention to treat analysis, patients in Arm A (LD + ASCT), achieved a 100% Overall Response Rate (ORR) with 40% PR (n=8) and 60% Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) (n=12). In Arm B (LD only) the ORR was 75% (n=15), including 15% CR (n=3), 35% VGPR (n=7), 25% PR (n=5), 20% SD (n=4) and 5% PD (n=1). The ORR was significantly superior in the LD+ASCT group compared to LD alone (p=0.047). After a median follow-up of 25.3 months, 17 patients have PD (8 in LD+ASCT and 9 in LD alone), 6 have died (1 in LD+ASCT and 5 in LD alone). DOR, PFS and OS were not significantly different in both groups. OS showed a trend to be superior in patients treated with LD+ASCT (p=0.08). (Table 1). One patient in the LD+ASCT arm developed MDS 13 months after start of therapy. Conclusion: Our interim analysis of an ongoing clinical study suggests that treatment of newly diagnosed MM patients with lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone induction followed by upfront ASCT resulted in significantly improved ORR. There was no difference in terms of DOR or PFS with a trend of superior OS in the LD+ASCT group. The study requires careful interpretation based on the low patient number and relatively short follow up, but supports the continued role of upfront consolidative ASCT in newly diagnosed MM patients. The incidence of secondary malignancy was low with the development of 1 MDS. Updated data on response and overall survival will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Roodman: Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Raptis:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Speakers Bureau. Lentzsch:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; prIME Oncology: Honoraria; Imedex: Honoraria; Clinical Care Options: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.631.631 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 631-631 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽

Dominik Dytfeld ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

David H. Vesole ◽

Tara B. Anderson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Growth Factors ◽

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 631 Introduction: In relapsed and/or refractory MM, the combination of carfilzomib (CFZ) with lenalidomide (Len), and low-dose dexamethasone (Dex) (CRd) has shown very promising efficacy (78% ≥partial response [PR], 40% ≥very good partial response [VGPR], and 24% CR/nCR) and good tolerability including a low rate of peripheral neuropathy (Wang et al, ASCO, 2011). In a Phase I/II study of newly diagnosed MM, the regimen was well tolerated in the Phase I portion of the study up to a maximum dose of CFZ 36 mg/m2, Len 25 mg, and Dex 40 mg, and very active with 96% ≥PR, 70% ≥VGPR, and 55% CR/nCR (Jakubowiak et al, ASH 2010). The lack of overlapping toxicities has allowed these agents to be used at full doses and for extended periods. Here we report the results for all patients (pts) enrolled in both phases of this first prospective trial of CFZ combination in new MM. Methods: In the initial eight 28-day cycles, pts were treated with CFZ at 20 mg/m2, 27 mg/m2 (Phase I), and 36 mg/m2 (Phase I and II), given IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16, Len at 25 mg PO (days 1–21), and Dex at 40/20 mg PO weekly (cycles 1–4/5–8). Pts achieving ≥PR could proceed to stem cell collection (SCC) using growth factors alone (protocol recommendation) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) after 4 cycles. Per protocol, ASCT candidates were offered the option to continue CRd treatment after SCC. After 8 cycles, pts received 28-day maintenance cycles of CFZ (days 1, 2, 15, 16), Len days 1–21, and Dex weekly at the doses tolerated at the end of 8 cycles. Responses were assessed by IMWG criteria with the addition of nCR. Results: Enrollment was completed (53 pts): 4 pts at CFZ 20 mg/m2, 13 at CFZ 27 mg/m2 and 36 at CFZ 36 mg/m2 (18 in Phase I and 18 in Phase II). Median age was 59 years (range 35–81; 23 pts ≥65), 60% had ISS stage II/III, and 33% (of 49 with available data) had unfavorable cytogenetics: del 13 or hypodiploidy by metaphase, or t(4;14), t (14;16), del 17p by FISH. As of June 30, 2011, toxicity data (cycles 1–8) were available for 51 pts. Hematologic toxicities were reversible and included Grade (G) 3/4: anemia (18%), neutropenia (12%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). The most common non-hematologic toxicities (all G) were hyperglycemia (76%), hypophosphatemia (61%), and infection (53%). G3/4 non-hematologic AEs included hyperglycemia (24%), DVT/PE while on ASA prophylaxis (10%), infection (6%), and mood alteration (2%). PN was limited to G1/2 sensory (24%). Forty-five pts continue treatment with 22 pts in the maintenance phase. Six pts discontinued treatment: 2 proceeded to ASCT, 1 due to toxicity, and 3 due to events unrelated to treatment or per pt wish. The majority of pts did not require dose modifications, either in the initial (31%) or in the maintenance (25%) phase. After a median of 8 cycles (range 1–20), the best responses per IMWG criteria for 49 response-evaluable pts (all pts who completed 1+ cycle) are shown in the Table. Responses were rapid with 46/49 pts achieving at least PR after 1 cycle, and improved with the duration of treatment reaching 100% ≥PR after 4 cycles and 100% ≥VGPR, 79% CR/nCR after 12 cycles. Responses were deep even at the 2 lower dose levels with the majority of pts at 36 mg/m2 still early in treatment. Responses in pts with unfavorable cytogenetics were similar to response rates in all remaining pts and included a 100% ≥PR in 6 pts with del 17p. Twenty-four pts proceeded to SCC after a median of 5 cycles of CRd (range 4–9); using growth factors only in 23 pts and cyclophosphamide and growth factors in 1 pt, with a median 6.55 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected (range 3.75–9.6); all resumed CRd treatment. After a median of 9.5 months of follow-up, only 1 pt has progressed, and all are alive Conclusions: CRd is highly active and well-tolerated allowing the use of full doses for an extended time in newly-diagnosed MM pts with limited need for dose modification. Responses are rapid and improve over time reaching 100% ≥VGPR and early time-to-event data are very encouraging. These results compare favorably to the best frontline regimens in MM. Disclosures: Jakubowiak: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent carfilzomib, proteasome inhibitor, in the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; OrthoBiotec.Imedex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medicom World Wide: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Optum Health Education: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PER Group: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vesole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Hussein:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Leveque:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Vij:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Japanese Transplantation-Ineligible Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3452.3452 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3452-3452

Author(s):

Takaaki Chou ◽

Atsushi Shinagawa ◽

Toshiki Uchida ◽

Masafumi Taniwaki ◽

Hirokazu Hirata ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Prolonged Treatment ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Once Daily

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide (LEN) plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) has been shown to be effective and to have a manageable safety profile in non-Japanese patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) (Rajkumar, Lancet Oncol 2010). Recently, the FIRST trial showed prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and favorable overall survival (OS) benefits for pts who were administered continuous Rd until progressive disease (PD) vs. the standard of care melphalan-prednisolone-thalidomide (Facon, Blood 2013). In Japan, the combination of melphalan- prednisolone -Velcade®(MPV) is the current standard of care for transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. However, prolonged treatment (Tx) with MPV is associated with increased toxicity including peripheral neuropathy (PN) and bone marrow suppression. Consequently, continuous Tx with MPV may have limited benefits due to toxicity and related Tx discontinuation. MM-025 is a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, registration, single-arm trial. It aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the continuous Rd regimen in Japanese NDMM pts who are transplant-ineligible. Methods: The study enrolled Japanese NDMM pts who were aged ≥ 65 years (yrs), or were not candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pts with an ECOG performance status (PS) score > 2 or with grade ≥ 2 PN were excluded from the study. Tx consisted of LEN (25 mg once daily on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle) and dexamethasone (40 mg for pts aged ≤ 75 yrs or 20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs, once daily on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle) until PD or discontinuation. The dose of LEN was adjusted according to baseline renal function: 25 mg/day for pts with normal or mild renal impairment (RI) (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 60 mL/min); 10 mg/day for moderate RI (CrCl ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min); and 15 mg every other day for those with severe RI (CrCl < 30 mL/min, not requiring dialysis). Pts who discontinued Tx were followed up every 2 months (mos) for ≥ 5 yrs from the start of Tx. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; defined as complete response [CR] + very good partial response [VGPR] + partial response [PR]) based on the IMWG criteria. The secondary endpoints included time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and safety. Statistical analyses included the one-sample binomial test for ORR and Kaplan-Meier analysis for DOR, PFS, and OS. The data cutoff date for this analysis was November 2013. Results: A total of 26 pts were enrolled. Of these, 46.2% of pts (n = 12) were aged > 75 yrs, 50.0% (n = 13) were male, 19.2% (n = 5) had ISS stage III disease, 23.1% (n = 6) had an ECOG PS score of 2, and 7.7% (n = 2) had severe RI (CrCl < 30 mL/min). With a median follow-up of 7.4 mos, the median Tx duration was 6.4 mos. The ORR was 83.3%, including VGPRs (12.5%) (n=3) and PRs (70.8%) (n=17). The median TTR was 2.0 mos. Due to the short follow-up DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached at data cutoff. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs; reported in > 10% of pts) were anemia (19.2%), neutropenia (15.4%), and rash (11.5%). The most frequently reported AEs (≥ 20% incidence) were rash, constipation, anemia, nasopharyngitis, and insomnia. A total of 8 pts (30.8%) discontinued the study: 4 due to AEs, 3 through the investigator’s decision and 1 due to protocol deviation. No deaths, thromboembolic events, or second primary malignancies were reported. Conclusion: Continuous Rd was effective and well tolerated by Japanese transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. These findings are consistent with those reported in the FIRST trial (Facon, Blood 2013) and support the use of the Rd combination regimen as a first-line Tx for this pt group. Disclosures Off Label Use: Lenalidomide used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Taniwaki:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Iida:Celgene K.K.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Matsumura:Celgene: Honoraria. Ogaki:Celgene K.K.: Employment. Midorikawa:Celgene K.K.: Employment. Houck:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

Ixazomib or Lenalidomide Maintenance Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Consolidation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Large Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130644 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 602-602 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Ravi Vij ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

Nitya Nathwani ◽

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Feng Gao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Background: Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in multiple myeloma (MM), and has largely become the standard of care. However, toxicity leads to early discontinuation in nearly one-third of patients and additional options are needed (McCarthy, et al, JCO, 2017). Ixazomib is another maintenance option that has been shown to improve PFS; however, studies comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib are lacking. In this randomized phase 2 study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of using lenalidomide and ixazomib as part of consolidation and maintenance therapies after ASCT (NCT02253316). Methods: Eligible patients, age 18-70 with newly diagnosed MM undergoing ASCT during first-line treatment, were consented prior to ASCT. Approximately 4 months following ASCT, patients received 4 cycles of consolidation therapy with IRd [ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, lenalidomide 15 mg on days 1 through 21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8 and 15]. Primary data on IRd consolidation were presented at ASH 2018 (Abstract 109920). One month after the last consolidation cycle, patients were randomized (1:1) to maintenance therapy with single-agent ixazomib (4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or lenalidomide (10 mg daily months 1-3 followed by 15 mg for months 4+). The arms were stratified based on MRD-status post-consolidation. In total, 237 patients were enrolled from 10 US centers. This abstract coincides with planned interim analysis 3 which is the first comparison of ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance. While the study was not powered to compare PFS between the two arms, the sample will provide a reasonable power to estimate non-inferiority. There is a planned stopping rule for non-inferiority set at a hazard ratio of >1.3 in favor of lenalidomide. Secondary end-points include MRD-negativity following 12 cycles and toxicity. Results: At time of abstract submission, 215 patients had completed IRd consolidation and 191 had begun maintenance. 90 were randomized to ixazomib and 94 to lenalidomide. 7 patients were not randomized due to toxicity during consolidation; data from these patients are not included in the analyses. The characteristics of the two arms are summarized in Table 1. Hematologic toxicity has been infrequent with ixazomib with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 11% and 23% of patients. In comparison, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 45% and 35% of patients on lenalidomide. The most common non-hematologic toxicities in both arms have been GI-related and infections, both expected events. 16% of patients on ixazomib have experienced Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity compared to 34% on lenalidomide. No grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy has been reported in either arm. 11% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued due to toxicity and another 9% have required a dose reduction to 3mg. Lenalidomide toxicity has led to discontinuation in 15% of patients and another 12% were dose reduced to 5mg. Only 45% of patients receiving 4+ cycles of lenalidomide were able to titrate to the 15mg dose. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months from randomization (19.7 months post-ASCT), 30% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. After a median follow-up of 12.3 months from randomization (20.2 months post-ASCT), 18% patients on lenalidomide have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Conclusion: Ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance have been well tolerated to date. A comparison of PFS is currently being conducted as part of interim analysis 3 and final results will be presented, representing the first report directly comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib maintenance. Table 1: Disclosures Vij: Genentech: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Martin:Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Roche and Juno: Consultancy. Fiala:Incyte: Research Funding. Deol:Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Hofmeister:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Nektar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory:Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Chari:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosko:Vyxeos: Other: Travel support.

Download Full-text

Thalidomide Combined With High Dose Melphalan Improves Event Free and Overall Survival In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Extended Follow-Up Of The HOVON-50 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3332.3332 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3332-3332 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Henk Lokhorst ◽

Bronno van der Holt ◽

Sonja Zweegman ◽

Edo Vellenga ◽

Sandra Croockewit ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Previous Analysis ◽

Alpha Interferon ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background The randomised, open-label, phase III trial HOVON-50 was designed to evaluate the effect of thalidomide during induction and maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. The previous analysis showed that thalidomide improved the primary endpoint EFS, but had no impact on OS (Lokhorst et al; Blood 2010 115: 1113-1120). Method Patients with Salmon & Durie stage II or III, age 18-65 years inclusive, were randomly assigned to arm A: 3 cycles of VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) or to arm B, 3 cycles of TAD (Thalidomide 200 orally, days 1-28 instead of Vincristine) Thalidomide was given from day 1 until 2 weeks before the stem cell mobilization with CAD (Cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 iv day 1)and G-CSF. After induction therapy patients received 1 or 2 courses of high dose Melphalan (HDM) 200 mg/m2 with autologous stem cell rescue followed by maintenance therapy with alpha-Interferon (Arm A) or Thalidomide 50 mg daily (arm B) until relapse or progression. Between November 27, 2001 and May 31, 2005, 556 patients were randomised of which 536 patients were eligible for evaluation. As of July 2013 the median follow up of the 201 patients still alive is 99 months, range 65 – 130 months. Results The best responses achieved on protocol after extended follow-up were improved and significantly higher in the patients randomized to thalidomide: ≥ PR 88% vs 80 % (p<0.01), at least VGPR 66 % vs 55% (p<0.01), CR 31% vs 24 % (p=0.04), respectively. Similar to the previous analysis thalidomide improved EFS (censored at allo-SCT) from median 22 months to 33 months,; HR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.51 - 0.78], p<0.001) and PFS from median 25 to 33 months (HR =0.70, 95% CI [0.58 - 0.84], p<0.001). After 5 years of randomization the overall OS curves diverged and thalidomide improved median OS from 65 to 75 months. 10 years from randomization 27 % of patients randomized to alpha-Interferon are still alive and 35% of patients randomized to Thalidomide. For OS multivariate analysis showed prognostic significance for the whole group of patients for LDH (HR=1.52, 95% CI [1.15-2.00], P= 0.004) and ISS (HR=1.31, 95% CI [1.11-1.53, P=0.001]. For the secondary endpoint OS the thalidomide arm was superior when adjusted for covariates in multivariate analysis (HR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.64 – 0.99], P=0.045). The incidence of second primary malignancies (SPM) was similar between the two arms, as well as the actuarial probability to get an SPM within 5 years from start of the therapy (5-6%) or 10 years (9-10%) Conclusion After long term follow-up thalidomide in induction and maintenance treatment and in combination with HDM improves the quality of response and achieves superior EFS and OS. No increased incidence of SPM was observed as compared to patients not receiving thalidomide. This trial was registered on www. Trialregister.nl as NTR238 and was supported by the Dutch Cancer Foundation. Disclosures: Lokhorst: Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson-Cilag: Honoraria; Mudipharma: Honoraria. Minnema:Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sonneveld:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Effect of Autologous Transplantation on PFS2 in Myeloma Patients Receiving Front-Line Bird (clarithromycin, lenalidomide, dexamethasone)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5778.5778 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5778-5778

Author(s):

Ekta Aneja ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Tomer M Mark ◽

David Jayabalan ◽

Roger Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Line ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Progression Of Disease

Abstract Background: BiRd (clarithromycin, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) combination therapy yields >90% overall response rates in newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). Long term follow up of the phase II BiRd study revealed 49% of patients went on to receive autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (ASCT), either as consolidation or salvage. Here we evaluate progression free survival 2 (PFS2) and overall survival (OS) in our cohort of patients, and assess the impact of ASCT. Methods: Seventy-two patients with newly diagnosed MM were enrolled on the BiRd trial between Dec 2004 and Nov 2006. BiRd is lenalidomide 25mg PO daily (d1-21), clarithromycin 500mg PO BID, dexamethasone 40mg PO weekly, for 28 day cycle. Patients remained on BiRd until progression of disease, consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), or unacceptable toxicity, and all continued to be monitored through subsequent lines of therapy. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients enrolled in the BiRd trial. PFS2 was defined as the time elapsed from start of BiRd until progression of disease on 2nd line therapy. Results: With over 8 years of follow up, 6 patients remain on continuous BiRd, 28 received ASCT consolidation, and another 6 received ASCT as salvage. Nine patients died on induction therapy and the remaining patients received second line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by no ASCT, consolidation ASCT and salvage ASCT. Median PFS2 was 98 months, 94 months, and 53 months, respectively (p<0.22). Twenty-three patients died during second line therapy. Median OS was not reached, 102 months, and 55 months respectively (p<0.92). Discussion: Advances in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma over the past decade have introduced increasing numbers of therapeutic options, improving survival considerably. While multiple myeloma is still considered an incurable disease, patients today will likely receive several lines of therapy. The contribution and timing of each option must be considered. In our cohort of patients, receiving ASCT in the salvage setting trended toward shorter PFS, however failed to reach statistical significance. Consolidation with ASCT in our patient cohort did not translate into survival advantage. The optimal timing and utility of ASCT in the era of novel agents and increasing treatment options warrants further review, and is an area of active investigation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Rossi: celgene: Speakers Bureau; millenium: Speakers Bureau. Mark:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Coleman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Trial of Daratumumab, Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Modified Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131476 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 864-864 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Prashant Kapoor ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Betsy Laplant ◽

Gabriella C Malave ◽

Eric Wolfe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk

Background: The current commonly used regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) utilize steroids (dexamethasone or prednisone) in various combinations: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd), bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd), daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) and daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (DVMP). However, steroid therapy may be associated with various adverse effects, including, but not limited to mood changes, insomnia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, osteoporosis, adrenal suppression, muscle weakness, and increased risk of opportunistic infections. A recent trial demonstrated improved tolerability of a regimen (Rd-R) involving an abbreviated course of dexamethasone, without compromising the efficacy in patients with intermediate-fit NDMM (Lorocca A., et al., ASH 2018). We designed a phase 2 clinical trial to examine the safety and efficacy of daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody in combination with an all-oral regimen of ixazomib, a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, and modified dose dexamethasone (IRd). Patients and Methods: NDMM patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function were enrolled, irrespective of their transplant eligibility. The primary objective was to determine the rate of complete response (CR) to daratumumab-IRd. Treatment consisted of daratumumab, 16 mg/kg, weekly for two cycles, every other week during cycles 3-6 and then every 4 weeks, ixazomib, 4 mg days 1, 8, 15, lenalidomide, 25 mg days 1-21, and dexamethasone upto 40 mg intravenously weekly for no more than two cycles, followed by use only as a prophylactic premedication for daratumumab-associated infusion reactions. Myeloma risk stratification was assessed by cytoplasmic immunoglobulin fluorescence in-situ hybridization (cIg FISH) analysis. Results: Overall, 40 patients were accrued, with data available on all patients for analysis at the cutoff date of July 19, 2019. The median age at enrollment was 64.5 (33-81) years; 37.5% were female. Eight (20%) patients were high risk by FISH. The median number of cycles was 6 (2-11) and the median follow up was 6.1 (2-11.7) months. Among 40 patients who had received at least 2 cycles of therapy, responses were attained rapidly; at the end of cycle 2, 88% patients achieved at least a partial response and 33% at least a very good partial response (VGPR) that improved to 52% at the end of 4 cycles among 29 patients who had completed at least 4 cycles. The overall best confirmed response rate among all 40 patients (Figure 1) was 95%, including 10% stringent CR, 5% CR and 23% near CR (13% VGPR excluding nCR). Stem cell collection was completed in 17 patients so far, all of whom required filgrastim and plerixafor. The median CD34+ cell count was 7.7 (range 2.9-11.6) million/kg . All patients were alive and 39 (97.5%) patients were progression-free at last follow up. Four (10%) patients proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation off study, per patient and/or investigator discretion (1 in CR, 2 in PR, 1 with progressive disease). Overall, 224 cycles have been administered across the study, with dose reduction/ hold required in a subset of patients; ixazomib (10%), lenalidomide (20%), daratumumab (0%) and dexamethasone (13%); the most frequent reasons for dose adjustment were skin rash and hematologic toxicities. A grade 3 or higher adverse event, at least possibly attributed to the study drugs, was observed in 40% of patients; hematologic in 30% (lymphopenia 25%, neutropenia 15%, thrombocytopenia 5% and anemia 2.5%) and non-hematologic in 18% of patients (hyperglycemia 8%, diarrhea 5%, infections 5%, ileus 2.5%, maculopapular rash 2.5%, and fatigue 2.5%). Updated results with additional 6 months of follow up and minimal residual disease assessment related data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Our early results suggest that the combination of daratumumab, ixazomib, lenalidomide and modified dose dexamethasone is well-tolerated, with excellent activity, and does not adversely impact stem-cell mobilization in patients with NDMM. Disclosures Kapoor: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy. Gertz:Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Ionis: Honoraria. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Leung:Takeda: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab in combination with Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Download Full-text

Hevylite and Freelite Tests in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Utility and Correlations with Clinical Features

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5625.5625 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5625-5625

Author(s):

Paola Omedé ◽

Valter Redoglia ◽

Monica Astolfi ◽

Alessandra Larocca ◽

Stefano Spada ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Bone Marrow Infiltration ◽

Newly Diagnosed

Abstract Introduction Heavy light chain (HLC) assay is a recently developed method that separately quantifies the k and L-bounded amounts of a given intact immunoglobulin (Ig). It allows an accurate quantification of both the involved/uninvolved Ig and permits to quantify even small monoclonal protein. Free light chain (FLC) and HLC can provide prognostic information for multiple myeloma patients. We evaluated the role of HLC and FLC tests in the assessment and evolution of the disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Methods From February 2011 to April 2014, 1510 patients aged ≤65 years with symptomatic newly diagnosed MM were enrolled in the EMN02/HO95 study. Details about treatments and preliminary results of the main study were previously reported (Cavo M et al, abs8000, J Clin Oncol 34, 2016). In this analysis, we focused on patients enrolled in Italy (N=718). Serum samples from each enrolled patient were collected at diagnosis, before starting maintenance, and thereafter every 6 months. Samples from 665 patients at diagnosis and 156 at pre-maintenance were analyzed. Involved HLC ratio (iHLCR) was calculated with the involved Ig (either G or A) as numerator. Involved FLC ratio (iFLCR) was calculated as K/L or L/K with the monoclonal chain as numerator. FLC ratio (FLCR) and HLC ratio (HLCR) were calculated as K/L. The analyses were performed using Spearman correlation. Results Median follow-up was 32 months. At baseline the type of paraprotein was IgG in 428 (298 IgG-k, 130 IgG-L), IgΑ in 123 (77 IgΑ-k, 46 IgΑ-L) or light chain in 104 patients (k 73, L 31); 10 patients were IgD or IgM. International Staging System (ISS) stages were well distributed in all the isotypes. The median involved HLC values were IgG-K 28.97, IgG-L 30.6, IgA-K 41.7, IgA-L 35.7 g/L, light chain K 2719.58 mg/L, and light chain L 3369.75 mg/L. HLC IgG was significantly correlated with B2-microglobulin (r=0.31), extensive bone marrow infiltration >60% (r=0.31) and hemoglobin (r=-0.39). HLC IgA was not correlated with any disease parameter. In light chain MM, iFLC was correlated to B2-microglobulin (r=0.41), creatinine (r=0.39), extensive bone marrow infiltration >60% (r=0.39) and hemoglobin (r=-0.36). The increase of iFLCR (≥ median value) was significantly associated with IgG, ISS III, anemia, extensive bone marrow infiltration and higher creatinine (p<0.001), but not with the presence of high risk chromosomal abnormalities. High iFLCR (> third quartile) was significantly associated with inferior TTP (median 43.4 versus NR, HR 1.75 95% CI 1.22-2.53, p 0.003). The increase of iHLCR (≥ median value) was significantly associated with ISS III, anemia, and extensive bone marrow infiltration (p<0.001), whereas the presence of high risk chromosomal abnormalities was not. At pre-maintenance, 17% of patients had an abnormal HLCR, whereas 82% had a normalization of HLCR. The normalization of HLCR before starting maintenance was significantly related with the achievement of complete response (CR) (p=0.02) and a trend towards a longer 3-years TTP was observed (83% versus 74%, Log-rank test 0.05). Before start of maintenance, 27% of patients had a normalization of FLCR. No significant correlation with response or outcome was observed for patients who had a normalization of FLCR. At pre-maintenance, 67% IgG or IgA MM patients were immunofixation (IFX) negative. Among them, 8% had still an abnormal HLCR compared to IFX positive patients (8% versus 36%, p<0.001). Conclusions This preliminary analysis confirms the prognostic role of high iFLCR and iHLCR in newly diagnosed MM patients. HLCR normalization may be a valuable parameter to better define CR and predict outcome. HLC can quantify even small monoclonal protein when immunofixation is negative. Further follow-up is needed to assess the prognostic impact of HLC and FLC on survival outcome. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Larocca: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cavo:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria. Petrucci:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Patriarca:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory board; Mundipharma: Other: Advisory board; MSD: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Advisory board; Celgene: Consultancy. Corradini:Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gentium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Sonneveld:Celgene: Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Onyx: Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Millennium: Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Advisory board, Research Funding. Boccadoro:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria, Research Funding; SANOFI: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbivie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding. Palumbo:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Takeda: Employment, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Maintenance Therapy With Lenalidomide Significantly Improved Survival Of Yong Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2089.2089 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2089-2089 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Francesca Gay ◽

Federica Cavallo ◽

Tommaso Caravita ◽

Maide Cavalli ◽

Arnon Nagler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplant improves outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients in comparison to conventional chemotherapy. The incorporation of new drugs into induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy is changing the treatment paradigm and is questioning the role of HDT in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients <65 years. Previous finding have been presented (Boccadoro, ASCO 2013) and this analysis provides a longer follow-up. Aims To compare in a prospective randomized trial melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) with tandem melphalan (200 mg/m2) (MEL200) both followed by maintenance with lenalidomide or no maintenance in NDMM patients. Methods A 2x2 factorial randomized trial was designed. The induction treatment consisted of four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (25 mg d 1-21) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg d 1,8,15,22) (Rd). As consolidation, patients were randomized to MPR (N=202) [six 28-day cycles of melphalan (0.18 mg/k g d 1-4), prednisone (2 mg/kg d 1-4) and lenalidomide (10 mg d 1-21)] or MEL200 (N=200)[tandem melphalan 200 mg/m2 with stem-cell support]. Patients were further randomized, within each group, to receive lenalidomide maintenance (10 mg, days 1-21, N=198) or no maintenance (N=204). Primary study endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). The secondary study endpoints included response rates, safety and overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results From November 2007 to July 2009, 402 patients with NDMM <65 years of age were enrolled. All patients were stratified according to International Staging System (ISS) and age. Patient characteristics were well balanced in all groups. In the MPR group, the Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) rate was 50% with 13% of Complete Response (CR) while the VGPR rate was 52% including 19% of CR in the MEL200 group. In the MPR group the CR rate improved from 13% after consolidation to 17% after maintenance. In the MEL200 group the CR rate improved from 19% after consolidation to 25% after maintenance. After a median follow-up of 48 months, the median PFS was 24.2 months in MPR group and 38.6 months in MEL200 group ( P< 0.0001). A multivariate analysis confirms the PFS benefit associated with MEL200 across all subgroups of patients defined by stratification factors and baseline characteristics. The 5-year OS rate was similar between MPR (62%) and MEL200 (71%; P= 0.27). In a landmark analysis, lenalidomide maintenance significantly extended PFS from the start of maintenance (median 42,7 months) compared with no maintenance (median 17.5 months; P<.0001). The 4-year OS rate from the start of maintenance was higher in patients who received lenalidomide maintenance (80%) compared with patients who did not (62%; P= 0,01). No significant interaction was detected between MPR/MEL200 (P=0.704) and maintenance/observation (P=0.984) effects. During consolidation, the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) between MPR and MEL200 were as follow: neutropenia (50% vs. 90%), thrombocytopenia (8% vs. 89%), infections (1% vs. 15%) and gastrointestinal (0% vs. 18%), with complications being higher with MEL200. During the maintenance phase, grade 3-4 hematologic AEs were reported in 17% of patients receiving lenalidomide (16% neutropenia). For individual group comparisons during maintenance, grade 3-4 hematologic AEs were observed in 20% of patients receiving MPR plus lenalidomide maintenance compared with 15% receiving MEL200 plus lenalidomide maintenance. Second primary malignancies were observed in 11 patients (3%), and were mainly solid tumors. Four solid tumors were observed in the MEL200 group and one in the MPR group in the maintenance arm, while three solid tumors were observed in the MEL200 group and three in the MPR group in no maintenance arm. Conclusion The administration of MPR was significantly inferior to MEL200 in terms of PFS. Toxicities were significantly higher in MEL200 group, but manageable. OS is similar between MPR and MEL200. Lenalidomide maintenance significantly reduced the risk of progression and of death independently from the previous treatment. Disclosures: Gay: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Caravita:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Utilization of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130689 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5701-5701

Author(s):

Justin King ◽

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Scott R. Goldsmith ◽

Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽

Mark A. Schroeder ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Small Sample ◽

Poor Performance Status ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Equity Ownership

Historically, high-dose therapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) was reserved for younger patients. In more recent years, the use of ASCT has expanded in the older population. However, there is still limited data on the utilization and efficacy of ASCT in older patients, particularly those over the age of 75. To further evaluate this issue, we retrospectively analyzed all patients with newly diagnosed MM between the ages of 75-78, the institutional cutoff for ASCT eligibility, that were referred to the stem cell transplant unit at our institution for consultation from the years 2012-2018. Baseline characteristics, anti-myeloma treatments, and patient outcomes were abstracted through chart review. Seventy-five patients were referred to our institution. 71% were male, 29% female. 39% patients were considered ineligible for ASCT by the consulting transplant physician. Most patients were considered transplant ineligible due to comorbidities or poor performance status. Of the 46 patients eligible for ASCT, 52% underwent the procedure during their first-line therapy. The majority of those patients received reduced intensity melphalan (140 mg/m2) while 2 patients received conventional dosing (200 mg/m2). The other 22 patients eligible for ASCT declined or elected to defer the procedure and to be treated with conventional therapy. The characteristics of these three groups were similar and are detailed in Table 1. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 25% of the patients had expired. Estimated median overall survival (OS) was 71.3 months (unable to quantitate 95% CI) for all patients. Compared to transplant eligible patients, regardless of transplant receipt, those who were transplant ineligible had a 186% increase risk for death (HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.12-7.35; p = 0.029). There was also a notable trend for longer OS in those who underwent ASCT compared to those who were eligible but declined the procedure, but it was not statistically significant (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.10-1.28; p = 0.114). At a transplant center, two-thirds of patients referred for newly diagnosed MM between the ages 75-78 were considered eligible for ASCT and one-third underwent the procedure. Outcomes were better for patients eligible for ASCT, regardless of whether they underwent the procedure. There was also a trend for better OS in patients who underwent the procedure compared to those who declined. While small sample sizes and the retrospective nature of the study limit our ability to draw conclusions, it appears that ASCT has an OS benefit among patients age 75-78. Disclosures Fiala: Incyte: Research Funding. Stockerl-Goldstein:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Abbott: Equity Ownership. Vij:Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wildes:Janssen: Research Funding; Carevive: Consultancy.

Download Full-text