The Outcomes Of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation In Patients With Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia (MPAL) Are Comparable To Those In Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Results Of a Matched-Pair Analysis

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3403-3403
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Shimizu ◽  
Takayuki Saitoh ◽  
Shinichiro Machida ◽  
Shinichi Kako ◽  
Noriko Doki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background MPAL is a rare subtype of acute leukemia that accounts for 2-5% of all acute leukemia cases. It has been reported that patients with MPAL tend to have worse prognosis compared with those with AML or ALL. However, the efficacy and safety of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for adult MPAL patients has yet to be elucidated. Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the outcomes of allo-SCT for adult MPAL and compared with those for AML/ALL using a matched pair analysis method. Patients and Methods This study included patients over 15 years of age who were diagnosed with MPAL according to the WHO classification and underwent allo-SCT for the first time between January 2001 and December 2010. Their clinical data were collected from the database of the Kanto Study Group for Cell Therapy. The clinical features and transplant outcomes of MPAL patients were then compared with those of adult patients with AML, ALL, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute leukemia (Ph+AL). We selected control cohorts at the rate of one to five using an optimal matching method with the following seven matching factors: age, sex, disease status at the time of transplant, the intensity of conditioning, human leukocyte antigen disparity between donor and recipient, donor type (related or not), and time of transplant (2001-2005 or 2006-2010). Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidences (CI) of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were compared using the stratified Gray test. P <0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance. Results Eighteen MPAL patients (9 men, 9 women) with a median age of 40 years (range, 16–61 years) were identified. Immunophenotypic analysis showed B+M phenotype in 12 patients, B+T phenotype in five, and B+T+M phenotype in one. Seven patients possessed Ph. Fourteen patients were in remission at the time of transplant. Sixteen patients were conditioned with myeloablative regimens. Stem cell sources were related donor bone marrow in four patients, unrelated donor bone marrow in 13, and cord blood in one. Among 18 MPAL patients, 5-year OS and RFS rates were 48.1% and 39.7%, respectively, and 5-year CI of relapse and NRM were 43.3% and 17.1%, respectively. Patients in remission at the time of transplant showed significantly better outcomes than those not in remission (5-year OS: 71.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001; 5-year RFS: 58.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.004). By contrast, no significant difference was seen in OS and RFS when stratifying patients according to immunophenotype and cytogenetic abnormalities. In matched pair analysis, 90 AML, 90 ALL, and 35 Ph+AL patients were extracted from the database as control. The 5-year OS rate of MPAL patients was similar to those of AML patients (48.1% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.855) and ALL patients (48.1% vs. 37.8%; p = 0.426). Similarly, the 5-year OS rate of Ph+MPAL patients was not significantly different from that of Ph+AL patients (68.6% vs. 39.9%; p = 0.234). No significant difference was observed in RFS, CI of relapse, and CI of NRM when comparing MPAL patients with AML and ALL patients, and Ph+MPAL patients with Ph+AL patients. Conclusion Transplant outcomes of adult MPAL patients were comparable to those of both AML and ALL patients, although the statistical power was possibly insufficient due to the relatively small cohort. The existing transplant procedures were not satisfactory for MPAL patients who were not in remission at the time of transplant. On the other hand, MPAL patients who underwent allo-SCT while in remission showed excellent outcomes. Therefore, transplant early in the disease course may lead to improved outcomes for patients with this serious disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4211-4211
Author(s):  
Jimin Shi ◽  
Xiaojian Meng ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Yamin Tan ◽  
Xiaoli Zhu ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4211 Isolated extramedullary relapse (EMR) of acute leukemia (AL) is a rare occurrence although it appears to be more common following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). To characterize what has been observed in isolated EMR, we investigated a total of 287 consecutive AL patients (144 acute myeloid leukemia, 138 acute lymphocytic leukemia and 5 acute mixed lineage leukemia) who underwent allo-SCT. Forty-seven (16.4%) patients experienced relapse after allo-SCT. 12 cases (4.2%) experienced relapse of extramedullary sites without concomitant bone marrow involvement. Isolated EMR accounted for 25.5% of the overall initial relapse. The time to relapse after allo-SCT was longer in the extramedullary sites than in the marrow (median, 10 months vs. 5.5 months, P<0.05,). Sites of EMR varied widely including central nervous system, skin, bone, pelvis and breasts. The variables considered for univariate analysis included donor gender, age, primary disease, disease status, cytogenetics/molecular abnormalities, preconditioning regimen, donor type, HLA match, aGVHD and cGVHD. The variables that showed significant correlation with isolated EMR were the cytogenetics abnormalities at diagnosis. The prognosis for patients who develop EMR remained poor but was relatively better than that after bone marrow (BM) relapse (overall survival, 10 vs. 18 months, P<0.05). Compared with local or single therapy, patients treated with systemic in combination with local treatment could yield favorable prognosis. Three patients survived 63, 55 and 49 months after transplant respectively, of whom two received DLI with subsequent chemotherapy and (or) irradiation and one had surgery with subsequent chemotherapy. In conclusion, we observed a significant number of isolated EMR of AL after allo-SCT and intensive approaches combined of local and systemic therapy can produce favorable response which may cure a percentage of these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 3835-3839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Borgmann ◽  
Arend von Stackelberg ◽  
Reinhard Hartmann ◽  
Wolfram Ebell ◽  
Thomas Klingebiel ◽  
...  

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is frequently considered as treatment for relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For patients without a matched sibling donor, SCT from unrelated donors (UD-SCT) has been increasingly performed during the past years. However, UD-SCT–related mortality and morbidity is still considerable, and the question remains as to which patients are at such high risk of recurrence that UD-SCT is indicated and, conversely, which patients do not require transplantation for long-term disease control. A matched-pair analysis was performed among patients treated according to Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapse Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (ALL-REZ BFM) Study Group protocols after first relapse with chemotherapy or UD-SCT. Altogether 81 pairs were identified that could be matched exactly for site of relapse and immunophenotype, and as closely as possible for duration of first remission, age, diagnosis date, and peripheral blast cell count at relapse. No significant difference in the probability of event-free survival (pEFS) between UD-SCT and chemotherapy existed regarding 28 pairs with an intermediate prognosis (0.39 ± 0.10 vs 0.49 ± 0.11,P = .105), whereas the pEFS was significantly different in the 53 pairs with a poor prognosis (0.44 ± 0.07 vs 0.00 ± 0.00, P < .001). The major reasons of treatment failure among patients who underwent UD-SCT were therapy-related death (TRD; 24/81) and relapses (20/81). In contrast, TRD rarely occurred in patients treated with chemotherapy alone (3/81), but relapse was much more common (62/81). In conclusion, UD-SCT provides better event-free survival for children with high-risk relapsed ALL. However, there is no clear advantage of UD-SCT in patients with intermediate prognosis.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2508-2508
Author(s):  
Norbert Claude Gorin ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Simona Piemontese ◽  
Fabio Ciceri ◽  
Arnon Nagler ◽  
...  

Abstract Adult patients with acute leukemia in need of a transplant but with no genoidentical donor, are nowadays usually considered upfront for an alternative donor transplant, while autologous stem cell transplantation is seldom done. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome after T cell-replete haploidentical transplant and autologous transplant. We used data from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry. From January 2007 to December 2012, 234 adult patients with acute leukemia, transplanted with marrow from a haploidentical family donor, and 2259 autografted patients were reported to the EBMT registry. We performed a matched pair analysis on 188 haploidentical and 356 autologous transplants using age, diagnosis, disease status, cytogenetics, and interval from diagnosis to transplant as matching factors. The median follow-up was 15 months. The two-year non-relapse mortality rate was higher post-haploidentical transplant ( 27% versus 4%; p <10-5 ) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.16, p<0.0001], and the relapse incidence was higher after autologous transplantation ( 49% versus 31%, p <10-4) (HR: 1.69, p=0.02). Regarding LFS, there was no difference between haploidentical transplants and ASCT (Figure 1 A and 1 C). Overall survival was higher after autologous transplantation (HR: 0.69, p=0.02) with 63% versus 53% (p=0.01) in all patients, 67% versus 54% (p=0.006) in patients transplanted in first complete remission (Figure 1B), and 45% versus 47% in second complete remission (Figure 1 D). Thirty-six patients with Ph+ ALL received an autograft and 19 received a haploidentical transplant. ASCT was associated with better NRM (8% versus 46%; p=0.002), LFS (53% versus 22%; p= 0.01), and OS (70% versus 19%; p 0.001), while RI was identical (39% versus 32%; p=0.83). When comparing haploidentical transplants performed in “haplo expert” centers to ASCT, there was no difference in LFS (haplo: 53% versus ASCT 46%, p=0.17) and OS (haplo: 59% versus ASCT 63%, p=0.58) (Figure 2). These findings indicate that autologous stem cell transplantation remains a valuable therapeutic option for patients with no identical donors. Figure 1: Leukemia-free survival and overall survival in patients transplanted in first (A, B) and second remission (C, D). Overall survival in patients transplanted in CR1 (C) is significantly higher following autologous stem cell transplantation (p=0.006 ). Figure 1:. Leukemia-free survival and overall survival in patients transplanted in first (A, B) and second remission (C, D). Overall survival in patients transplanted in CR1 (C) is significantly higher following autologous stem cell transplantation (p=0.006 ). Figure 2: Leukemia-free survival of patients autografted and patients receiving a haploidentical transplant in “haplo expert” versus regular transplant centers. Figure 2:. Leukemia-free survival of patients autografted and patients receiving a haploidentical transplant in “haplo expert” versus regular transplant centers. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 614-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document