A Phase I Study of Lenalidomide and Cytarabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract Background: Relapsed/refractory (r/r) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) remains a therapeutic challenge. Although cytarabine arabinoside (AraC) is the most active drug, constituting the backbone of a majority of r/r regimens, the benchmark response to therapy remains a dismal 17 to 20% (Burnett, Wetzler et al. JCO, 2011.). The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide (Len), is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for multiple myeloma and myelodysplasia and has demonstrated activity as a single agent in AML at doses as high as 50 mg for 21 days (d) of a 28 d cycle (Blum et al, JCO, 2010.). Based upon this activity profile we developed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Len in combination with AraC in patients with r/r AML. Methods: Eligible patients were older than 18 years(y), had r/r AML with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status better than 2 and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients were excluded for active CNS disease, uncontrolled infections, congestive heart failure, adrenal insufficiency, anti-cancer therapy within 14 d of enrollment, or prior exposure to Len. All enrolled patients had to practice appropriate contraception. Patients received AraC 1.5 g/m2/d over 3 hours on d 1-5 of a 28 day cycle, with a plan for standard 3+3 Len dose escalation. Initial patients received Len 25 mg on d 6-10 (n= 3), subsequent patients received doses between 25 and 10 mg (dose de-escalation) on d 6-26 with 2 d of rest prior to the next cycle. Following induction, patients who had residual AML (>5%) could receive a second identical course of therapy, provided they demonstrated an improvement in blast percentage relative to baseline. Patients who achieved CR received maintenance with Len 10 mg/d continuously. A 12 patient expanded cohort was enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to assess efficacy. Responses were assessed by International Working Group Criteria for AML (Cheson B et al. JCO, 2003.). Patient Characteristics: Fifty-one patients were consented and 45 were treated on study, 32 of these were evaluable for response, all patients were evaluated for toxicity. Approximately half the patients were female (20/45). The median age was 66 y (range 33-82) and median WBC 2.42x109/L (range 0.18-63.15). Four patients (8%) had an antecedent hematological disorder. By European LeukemiaNet criteria 2 patients (4%) had favorable risk disease, 8 (18%) were Int-1, 12(27%) were Int-2 and 11 (24%) were adverse risk; 12(27%) patients were not evaluable by ELN due to lack of karyotype or molecular data from diagnosis. Twelve patients had primary refractory AML. Results: The MTD for Len given on d 6-26 in combination with AraC at 1.5 g/m2/d x 5 d was 10 mg. Dose de-escalation from the starting dose of 25 mg on this schedule was required due to excess toxicity. The most commonly observed non-hematologic drug related adverse events seen on the study (all < grade 2 unless indicated) were nausea, increased liver function tests (>grade 3), rash (grade >3), hypokalemia (> grade 3) and fatigue. At the 25 mg dose level the dose limiting toxicity was rash, while patients enrolled at the 15 mg dose level experienced dose limiting elevation in LFTs, fatigue and bleeding. Five patients achieved a CR (16%), 5 demonstrated CRi (16%) and there were 3 hematological improvements (HI) for an overall response rate (CR+Cri+HI) of 41% (13/32). The median overall survival (OS) (95% confidence interval) for patients treated on study was 5.8 (2.5, 10.6) months and disease free survival was 3.4 (2.3, 6.2) months. Conclusions: Although prior interesting data support the activity of single agent high dose Len in r/r AML, our single institute phase I study of intermediate dose AraC followed by Len was associated with marked skin and other toxicities at the Len 25 mg dose level, precluding dose escalation to the historically more active 50 mg dose. The CR rate in this study was not dissimilar to previously reported responses with single agent or combination AraC based regimens. Issues of dose and schedule for this combination may have had a significant impact on the potential benefit for these two drugs in combination. Nevertheless, the overall low CR rate from this study does not suggest any superiority for this combination in comparison with the historical single agent response rate for intermediate dose AraC in r/r AML. Disclosures Griffiths: Celgene, Incyte and Alexion: Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Other. Wetzler:MedPace: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sigma Tau: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Plexus: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Trial of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in Combination with Rituximab (R) and Bendamustine in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1643.1643 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1643-1643 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Kristie A. Blum ◽

Beth Christian ◽

Joseph M. Flynn ◽

Samantha M. Jaglowski ◽

Jeffrey Alan Jones ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

B Cell ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Single Agent ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Irreversible Inhibitor ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Reductions

Abstract Abstract 1643 Introduction: Ibrutinib is an orally available, irreversible inhibitor of BTK, a downstream protein in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway critical for normal B-cell development. In a phase I study in patients with relapsed B-cell malignancies (Fowler ASH 2010), the overall response rate (ORR) was 43%, with responses observed in patients with relapsed mantle cell (MCL), diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), follicular (FL), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). In a phase II single agent study in MCL (Wang ASH 2011), ORR was 67% with several responding patients remaining on ibrutinib over 1 year. Rituximab (R) and bendamustine is a highly active regimen with ORR ranging from 52–92% in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicities, and preliminary efficacy of R-bendamustine in combination with ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Methods: Eligibility included patients with relapsed/refractory FL, MZL, MCL, transformed NHL, and DLBCL, and patients with previously untreated MCL not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ANC ≥1000/mm3, platelets ≥50,000/mm3, and creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL were required at study entry. Prior ASCT, rituximab, bendamustine, and ibrutinib were permitted. Treatment consisted of R 375 mg/m2 day 1, bendamustine 90 mg/m2days 1 and 2, and escalating doses of ibrutinib (280 mg or 560 mg) days 1–28 every 28 days for 6 cycles. Six patients were enrolled at each dose level. Responding patients could continue ibrutinib alone after cycle 6 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pegfilgrastim was permitted for patients with grade 4 neutropenia during cycles 1–6. Response was assessed after cycles 3 and 6 by International Harmonization Criteria (Cheson, JCO 2007). Results: Eleven patients (9 males) with a median age of 72 (range 45–84) previously treated with a median of 3 prior therapies (range 0–10) were enrolled. Six patients were refractory to their most recent therapy, 4 patients had prior ASCT, 2 patients had received prior bendamustine, and no patients had prior ibrutinib. Other characteristics included stage III-IV disease in 82%, extranodal involvement in 64%, elevated IPI ≥3 in 55%, bulky adenopathy ≥5 cm in 45%, B-symptoms in 45%, and elevated LDH in 36%. Histologies included MCL (n=3), DLBCL (n=3, all germinal center origin by Hans immunohistochemical criteria), transformed NHL (n=2), FL (n=2), MZL (n=1). Nine patients completed two or more cycles of therapy (median 3, range 1–6) with 280 mg of ibrutinib (n=6) and 560 mg of ibrutinib (n=3). Two patients who discontinued therapy prior to completing cycle 1 for progressive disease (PD) at 280 mg and 560 mg of ibrutinib, respectively, were replaced. Six patients continue to receive protocol treatment. The 5 patients off study included the 2 patients with DLBCL and transformed NHL who were replaced for PD prior to completing cycle 1, 2 patients with DLBCL and PD after cycles 3 and 4, and 1 patient with MCL receiving 280 mg ibrutinib with R-bendamustine who discontinued due to grade 3 neutropenia lasting > 14 days after cycle 4. No DLTs have been observed. Grade 3–4 events included lymphopenia (64%), neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (18%), pancreatitis (9%), vomiting (9%), shingles (9%), and rash (9%). Dose reductions from 280 mg ibrutinib to 140 mg were required in 3 patients for grade 3 thrombocytopenia, pancreatitis, and rash. Bendamustine dose reductions to 60 mg/m2were required in 1 patient for grade 3 thrombocytopenia. ORR was 38% in 8 evaluable patients, with 3 patients currently receiving protocol treatment who have not yet undergone restaging scans. Responses included 2 complete responses and 1 partial response in the 3 patients with MCL. Conclusions: Combined ibrutinib with R-bendamustine appears well tolerated without unexpected toxicity and with preliminary activity in patients with previously untreated and relapsed MCL. Three additional patients will be accrued to the 560 mg dose level and expansion cohorts examining this combination specifically in patients with FL, DLBCL, and MCL are planned. Disclosures: Blum: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ibrutinib is not approved for the treatment of NHL. Jaglowski:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Maddocks:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Tipifarnib Combined with Conventional Induction and Consolidation Therapy for Previously Untreated Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Age 60 and Over.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.899.899 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 899-899 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Joseph M. Brandwein ◽

Brian F. Leber ◽

Kang Howson-Jan ◽

Aaron D. Schimmer ◽

Andre C. Schuh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Grade Iii ◽

Acute Myeloid

Standard induction therapy for patients over age 60 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has produced complete response (CR) rates of around 55%, but most patients eventually relapse. Tipifarnib (R115777, ZarnestraR) has shown activity as a single agent in AML, and is well tolerated in older patients at doses up to 600 mg BID. This agent also has additive/synergistic effects on AML cell lines when combined with daunorubicin (DNR). From 2005–2007, patients age 60 and over with previously untreated AML (de novo or secondary) were enrolled in a Phase I study combining tipifarnib with standard induction therapy. The regimen consisted of cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion on days 1–7, DNR 60 mg/m2/day IV push x 3 on days 6–8 and tipifarnib orally twice daily on days 6–15. Tipifarnib was escalated over four doses levels in successive patient cohorts (200, 300, 400 and 600 mg). Patients achieving CR were eligible to received one consolidation using the same regimen. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade III–IV non–hematologic toxicity or hematologic recovery times > 40 days unless due to persistent leukemia. Up to 2/6 DLTs were permitted at each dose level. The following DLT’s were identified during induction: Dose level I: 2/6 (grade III hyperbilirubinemia, grade IV transient respiratory arrest), dose level II: 0/3, dose level III: 0/3 and dose level IV: 2/6 (grade III typhlitis, grade III supraventricular tachycardia). Four additional patients were enrolled at dose level IV, with one DLT (grade III diarrhea). There were no DLTs during consolidation. There were no cases of delayed hematologic recovery. Of 22 evaluable patients, there were 9 CR, 3 MLFS, 2 PR and 8 non-responders. Of 7 patients with adverse risk cytogenetics, there were 3 CR, 1 MLFS and 1 PR. In summary, this regimen was well tolerated and the DLT was not reached, although somewhat more GI toxicity was seen at dose level IV. Because of the inherent toxicity of the underlying regimen and the elderly population, it was decided not to escalate further, and tipifarnib 600 mg BID has been chosen as the recommended dose for further study using this regimen.

Download Full-text

EPCT-17. A PHASE I AND SURGICAL STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS IN CHILDREN WITH RECURRENT OR REFRACTORY MALIGNANT BRAIN TUMORS: PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR CONSORTIUM INTERIM REPORT

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.139 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽

pp. iii307-iii307

Author(s):

Mariko DeWire ◽

Christine Fuller ◽

Olivia Campagne ◽

Tong Lin ◽

Haitao Pan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Brain Tumors ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Single Agent ◽

Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽

Pi3k Pathway ◽

Neurosurgical Procedures ◽

Common Grade ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and PI3K pathway are commonly observed in recurrent childhood brain tumors. Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus was determined in the Phase I study and ribociclib concentrations were characterized in plasma and tumor in children undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Following resection, eligible patients were enrolled in the Phase I study according to a rolling 6 design and received ribociclib and everolimus once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively. Patients undergoing surgery received ribociclib at the pediatric RP2D (350 mg/m2/day) for 7–10 days pre-operatively. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on both cohorts and analyzed in nine patients on phase I study. Sixteen eligible patients enrolled on phase I study (median age 10.3 years; range: 3.9–20.4) and 5 patients were enrolled on the surgical cohort (median age 11.4 years; range: 7.2–17.1). Six patients enrolled at dose level 1 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Two of the three patients at dose level 2 experienced DLT (grade 3 hypertension and grade 4 ALT). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia, neutropenia, and leucopenia. Everolimus concentrations following administration of everolimus alone were lower than those following drug combination, suggesting an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus in recurrent CNS tumors is 120 mg/m2 and 1.2 mg/ m2 daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin and Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine (ARA-C) in Patients (PTS) with Relapsed and Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Myeloid Blast Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.1809.1809 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 1809-1809 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Stefan Faderl ◽

Alessandra Ferrajolil ◽

William Wierda ◽

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Farhad Ravandi-Kashani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Acute Leukemias ◽

First Remission ◽

First Relapse ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Phase I and II clinical studies demonstrated activity of Clofarabine in acute leukemias. In previous studies we have investigated clofarabine, plus ara-C combinations and reported a CR rate of 24% in relapsed AML and 52% in previously untreated AML ≥ 50 years (yrs) with acceptable toxicity profile. Anthracyclines are active in AML. To explore clofarabine further in AML combinations we conducted a phase I study of clofarabine with idarubicin with or without ara-C in pts with relapsed AML, MDS, and CML. Considered as dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are ≥ grade 3 drug-related toxicities. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined by “3+3” dose escalation scheme. On the clofarabine (C)/idarubicin (I) combination (CI), 9 AML pts are enrolled (2 primary refractory, 7 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs (range 24–71). Median first remission duration (CRD1): 3.1 mos. (0–7.6). For the first dose level, C was given at 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d and I at 12mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d. Among the first 6 pts, 2 ≥ gr. 3 toxicities (diarrhea, rash, ↑ bili) occurred necessitating dose de-escalation of C to 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5 and I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3. Among 3 pts, 1 ≥ gr.3 toxicity (↑ bili) was observed. No responses occurred. On the CI + ara-C arm (CIA), 7 AML pts are enrolled (1 primary refractory, 6 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs. (24–78). Median CRD1: 11.2 mos. (0–13.1). First dose level: C 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 1g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 3 pts, 2 developed ≥ gr.3 toxicities (↑ bili, diarrhea) leading to the following de-escalation: C 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 6mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 0.75g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 4 pts (1 ≥ gr. 3 rash, ↑ bili), 3 pts achieved CR. The phase I study is ongoing until determination of DLT and MTD for each arm. Our preliminary results indicate clinical activity of CIA even at the low dose level.

Download Full-text

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1874.1874 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1874-1874 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Donna E. Reece ◽

Esther Masih-Khan ◽

Arooj Khan ◽

Saima Dean ◽

Peter Anglin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1951.1951 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1951-1951 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Early Results Of a Phase I/II Trial Of Midostaurin (PKC412) and 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) For Patients (Pts) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3949.3949 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3949-3949

Author(s):

Paolo Strati ◽

Hagop M Kantarjian ◽

Aziz Nazha ◽

Gautam Borthakur ◽

Naval G. Daver ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Flt3 Mutations ◽

Flt3 Inhibitors ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) affect primarily elderly pts. Their treatment with aggressive chemotherapy is frequently challenging. Moreover, pts with FLT3 mutations have very poor prognosis. We hypothesized that the combination of midostaurin, a FLT3 inhibitor, and 5-AZA, a hypomethylating agent, may be an effective and safe regimen. Methods Both untreated (8) and previously treated (36) pts with AML or MDS were eligible for this study, regardless of FLT3 mutation and prior exposure to FLT3 inhibitors. Pts received 5-AZA 75 mg/mq subcutaneously or intravenously on day 1-7 and midostaurin 25 mg bid (in cohort 1 of phase I) or 50 mg bid (in cohort 2 of Phase I and in Phase II) orally on day 8-21 during the first cycle and continuously thereafter, for 12 cycles of 28 days duration. Cytogenetic risk was defined according to MRC criteria. Differences between categorical variables were compared by the chi2 test. CR duration (CRD) was calculated from the time of CR achievement until relapse and estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results Fourty-four pts were enrolled, 13 included in Phase I and 31 in Phase II. Baseline pts’ characteristics are shown in the Table. Thirty-eight pts (86%) received 50 mg bid of midostaurin, and 6 (14%; Phase I) received 25 mg bid. The median number of administered cycles was 2 (1-9). Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities consisted of 95% neutropenia, 64% anemia and 93% thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities consisted of 45% infections, 23% hypokalemia, 16% hyponatremia, 7% reduction in ejection fraction, 7% hyperuricemia, 4% hyperglycemia, 4% nausea/vomiting, 4% QTc prolongation, 4% hyperbilirubinemia, and 4% elevated AST. Eleven pts (25%) achieved a CR, 9 with incomplete platelet recovery (20%), after a median time of 13 (10-16) weeks from treatment start. Five (11%) of these pts relapsed after achieving CR. Two pts (5%) received an allogeneic stem cell transplant while on study, one in CR and one primary refractory (after a blast count drop from 27 to 7%), and they are both still in CR and alive. Among 26 pts with FLT3 ITD and no D835 mutation, 9 (35%) achieved CR/CRp. Six of 18 (33%) pts not previously exposed to FLT3 inhibitors responded. There was no significant correlation of dose with response (24% with 50 mg bid vs 33% with 25 mg bid, p=0.63). After a median follow-up of 15 (3-72) weeks, 20 pts (64%) died, 3 (7%) while on study (2 died of sepsis, 1 of unknown causes with progressive disease). The median CRD was 16 (9-23) months. Factors significantly associated with a longer CRD were male sex (p=0.04), age older than 65 years (0.03) and use of 50 mg bid of midostaurin (p=0.02). Conclusions The combination of midostaurin and 5-AZA is safe and well tolerated. Its efficacy is most noticeable among pts with FLT3 mutations. A longer response duration is observed using midostaurin at 50 mg bid dose and in elderly male pts. Disclosures: Ravandi: CELGENE: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; ASTELLAS: Research Funding; AMBIT: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Idarubicin Dose Escalation for Remission Induction Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1344.1344 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1344-1344

Author(s):

Mark Lee ◽

Sung-Yong Kim

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2 ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of idarubicin has been acknowledged to be 12-15 mg/m2/day for 3 days for acute leukemias. Its MTD should be reevaluated in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the era of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and better supportive care. We conducted a phase I study to investigate the safety of escalating doses of idarubicin in combination with cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days for previously untreated AML. The starting dose of idarubicin was 12 mg/m2/day for 3 days with dose escalations by 3 mg/m2/day. Cohorts of three patients were treated at each dose level, and the idarubicin dose was escalated up to 18 mg/m2/day until at least two patients among a cohort of three to six patients experienced the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (traditional 3+3 design for phase I clinical trials: J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:708). Hematologic DLTs were defined as the time to recovery of neutrophils {absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥500/μL} or platelets (platelet count ≥20,000/μL) exceeded 42 days after the start of induction therapy (J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4290). Non-hematologic DLTs were defined as grade 4 or 5 toxicities (Leukemia 1998;12:865). We adopted the NCI CTCAE v3.0 to grade the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Thirteen adult patients were enrolled in the study, but two and two were excluded at level 1 and level 2, respectively, because they received reinduction therapy for resistant disease within 4 weeks after the start of the assigned induction therapy. Consequently, nine patients were evaluable for the phase I study. The median times to recovery of neutrophils (ANC ≥500/μL) after the start of induction therapy at level 1, level 2, and level 3 were day 20 (range, 19-22), day 19 (range, 17-20), and day 25 (range, 21-26), respectively. The median times to recovery of platelet (platelet count ≥20,000/μL) at each level were day 20 (range, 19-23), day 20 (range, 16-34), and day 24 (range, 20-35), respectively. Therefore, grade 4 hematologic toxicities were observed at all 3 levels; however, these hematologic toxicities did not meet the criteria of the hematologic DLTs as defined in this study. There was any instance of grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity at each dose level. No death associated with the induction treatment was observed in this trial. Hematologic and non-hematologic DLTs as defined above were not observed at all 3 dose levels; therefore, idarubicin 18 mg/m2/day for 3 days could be defined as the MTD for this trial. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of PRO131921, a Novel Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CD20+ Indolent NHL: Correlation Between Clinical Responses and AUC Pharmacokinetics.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3742.3742 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3742-3742 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽

Julie M. Vose ◽

Brad S Kahl ◽

Mark W. Brunvand ◽

Andre Goy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Phase I ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Drug Exposure ◽

Single Agent ◽

Dose Cohort ◽

Clinical Responses ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 3742 Poster Board III-678 PRO131921 is a third-generation, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody engineered to have significantly increased antibody-dependent cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity compared to rituximab as shown in in vitro models. In preclinical in vivo lymphoma models, PRO131921 has superior anti-tumor efficacy compared to rituximab. In this Phase I study, PRO131921 was administered as a single agent to patients (pts) with CD20+, relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who had been treated with a prior rituximab-containing regimen. The aim of the study was to determine the safety and tolerability of PRO131921, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), its pharmacokinetics (PK), and to establish a Phase II dose. Pts were treated with PRO131921 by intravenous infusion (premedication with acetaminophen and anti-histamine) weekly for 4 weeks on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. The dose of the first infusion was approximately 50% that of subsequent infusions. The dose was escalated based on safety in a 3+3 design. PK samples were obtained pre- and post-infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, and once each on days 2, 23, 29, 50, and 78 (and at later time points for up to a year). Twenty-four pts were treated with PRO131921 at doses from 25 mg/m2 to 800 mg/m2. Median age was 58 yrs (38-78). Histologies were follicular NHL (n=20), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=3) or marginal zone NHL (n=1). Pts had received a median of 2 (range 1-6) prior regimens. PRO131921 was generally well-tolerated and no MTD was reached in the study. The most common adverse events were Grade 1 or 2 (CTCAE V3.0) chills, flushing, itching, fatigue, fever, nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, and hypotension, most of which were part of infusion-related reactions limited in general to the first infusion. These responded well to slowing or interruption of the infusion, and symptomatic treatment (including steroids). Grade 3 AEs (related and unrelated to study drug) included 3 episodes each of transient neutropenia and hypoxia, and single episodes of throat tightness, bronchospasm, syncope, fatigue, periarthritis, pneumonia, and deep venous thrombosis. There was 1 unrelated Grade 4 pulmonary embolism. Two pts did not receive all 4 doses of therapy due to DLTs. One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in the 200/400 mg/m2 dose cohort due to a significant infusion reaction, and a second was observed at the 300/800 mg/m2 dose cohort due to Grade 3 joint pain and fatigue after 2 infusions. Detailed PK studies of PRO131921 in all patients were broadly similar to rituximab with a dose-dependent increase in exposure, but with significant inter- and intra-patient variability. Analysis of PK data demonstrated a correlation between higher normalized drug exposure (normalized AUC) and both tumor shrinkage (p=0.049) and clinical response (p=0.034), consistent with the hypothesis that rapid drug clearance (e.g. by tumor in excess of drug) may result in decreased clinical efficacy. Best investigator-assessed responses to treatment in the 22 evaluable pts by day 78 or later were 6 PR, 13 SD, and 3 PD; 5/10 pts in the two highest dose cohorts responded. In conclusion, PRO131921 has shown clinical activity in rituximab-relapsed and refractory indolent NHL pts. The observation that higher normalized AUC may be associated with improved clinical responses has potential implications in future trials of monoclonal antibody-based therapies, and emphasizes the importance of early PK studies to optimize antibody efficacy. Disclosures: Friedberg: Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vose:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kahl:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brunvand:Genentech, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Goy:Genentech/Biogen IDEC: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kasamon:Genentech/Biogen IDEC: Research Funding. Burington:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Li:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Ho:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Cheson:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of a Phase I Study of Ibrutinib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3983.3983 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3983-3983 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Beth A Christian ◽

John G. Kuruvilla ◽

Sonali M. Smith ◽

Pierluigi Porcu ◽

Kami J. Maddocks ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

B Cell ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Off Label ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, and ibrutinib, a selective and covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, are orally bioavailable agents with single-agent activity in several histologic subtypes of relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We are conducting a phase I study of the combination of ibrutinib and lenalidomide to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and preliminary efficacy in pts with relapsed/refractory NHL and updated results are presented. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL including diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), transformed, mantle cell (MCL), marginal zone (MZL), lymphoplasmacytic (LPL), and follicular (FL) lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy were eligible. Prior autologous but not allogeneic stem cell transplant and prior lenalidomide were permitted. Prior ibrutinib, CNS involvement, and pts requiring anticoagulation were not permitted. ANC > 1000/mm3, platelets > 50,000/mm3, and creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL, ALT/AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and ECOG PS 0-2 were required at study entry. Treatment consisted of escalating doses of lenalidomide days 1-21 and ibrutinib days 1-28 of a 28 day cycle. A standard 3+3 dose escalation schema was followed. DLTs included: treatment delays > 14 days for toxicity; grade 5 toxicity; tumor lysis syndrome requiring dialysis; tumor flare reaction nonresponsive to corticosteroids; ANC < 500/mm3 or platelets <25, 000/mm3 persisting > 7 days; grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia or infection; and any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: DVT, diarrhea, nausea or vomiting amenable to medical therapy, correctable electrolyte abnormalities; grade 3 fatigue, or grade 3 maculopapular rash that resolved within 7 days. Pts without significant toxicity could continue treatment until disease progression. Response was assessed every 3 months for 12 months and then every 6 months until disease progression. Results: Twenty-five pts have been treated. Median age is 67 years (range 45-85) with 16 males. Histologies include DLBCL/transformed lymphoma (n=9), MCL (n=7), FL (n=4), MZL (n=2), and LPL (n=3). Four pts were treated at dose level (DL) 1 (lenalidomide 15 mg/ibrutinib 420 mg). One pt was replaced for rapid disease progression and 1 pt experienced DLT consisting of a grade 2 ischemic stroke. As a result of this DLT, DL 1 was expanded to 6 evaluable pts. A second DLT was observed, a grade 3 rash that resolved within 7 days but recurred on day 22. A total of 6 pts were then treated at DL-1 (lenalidomide 10 mg/ibrutinib 280 mg), and no DLTs were encountered. The protocol was amended to include additional dose levels. Pts enrolled on dose level -1A with lenalidomide 10 mg and ibrutinib 420 mg. One DLT occurred at this dose level, a grade 3 rash that failed to resolve within 7 days. The dose level was expanded to 6 pts without further DLT. DL-1B includes an intra-pt dose escalation of the lenalidomide from 10 mg in cycle 1 to 15 mg in cycle 2 with ibrutinib 420 mg. Six pts have been enrolled on this dose level. Three pts have been replaced including 2 with cytopenias not meeting DLT criteria but precluding dose escalation and one with progressive disease. Three pts at DL-1B remain on treatment. Related grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 16/24 currently evaluated pts (67%), including primarily hematologic toxicity, rash, increased LFTs, pneumonia, hypokalemia, and syncope. Pts have received a median of 3 cycles of therapy to date (range 1-19) and 9 remain on therapy. At DL 1, a pt with DLBCL achieved a complete response (CR) and a pt with transformed follicular achieved a partial response (PR). At DL-1, a pt with DLBCL achieved a CR and 1 pt each with MCL and FL achieved PR. At DL -1A, 1 pt each with MCL and MZL achieved a PR. Overall response rate for 18 assessable pts is 39%. Five pts had best response of stable disease. Sixteen pts have discontinued the study including 3 pts with DLTs, 2 for alternative treatment, 2 for toxicity, and 9 pts with progression. Conclusions: Combined therapy with lenalidomide and ibrutinib in pts with relapsed NHL is well-tolerated, although DLTs of recurrent rash and stroke were encountered. Lenalidomide 10 mg and ibrutinib 420 mg was tolerated and pts are currently enrolling in an intra-pt dose escalation cohort. Preliminary efficacy has been observed in pts with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, MCL, FL, MZL, and transformed NHL. Disclosures Christian: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Other: IDSM; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of ibrutnib and lenalidomide in combination in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is off-label. Kuruvilla:Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche Canada: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Porcu:Cell Medica: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Shape: Research Funding. Maddocks:Acerta: Research Funding; Pharamcyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Blum:Celgene: Research Funding; cephalon: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text