scholarly journals EPCT-17. A PHASE I AND SURGICAL STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS IN CHILDREN WITH RECURRENT OR REFRACTORY MALIGNANT BRAIN TUMORS: PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR CONSORTIUM INTERIM REPORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Olivia Campagne ◽  
Tong Lin ◽  
Haitao Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽  
Pi3k Pathway ◽  
Neurosurgical Procedures ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and PI3K pathway are commonly observed in recurrent childhood brain tumors. Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus was determined in the Phase I study and ribociclib concentrations were characterized in plasma and tumor in children undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Following resection, eligible patients were enrolled in the Phase I study according to a rolling 6 design and received ribociclib and everolimus once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively. Patients undergoing surgery received ribociclib at the pediatric RP2D (350 mg/m2/day) for 7–10 days pre-operatively. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on both cohorts and analyzed in nine patients on phase I study. Sixteen eligible patients enrolled on phase I study (median age 10.3 years; range: 3.9–20.4) and 5 patients were enrolled on the surgical cohort (median age 11.4 years; range: 7.2–17.1). Six patients enrolled at dose level 1 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Two of the three patients at dose level 2 experienced DLT (grade 3 hypertension and grade 4 ALT). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia, neutropenia, and leucopenia. Everolimus concentrations following administration of everolimus alone were lower than those following drug combination, suggesting an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus in recurrent CNS tumors is 120 mg/m2 and 1.2 mg/ m2 daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively.

scholarly journals A Phase I Study of Lenalidomide and Cytarabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2318-2318
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Griffiths ◽  
William Brady ◽  
Wei Tan ◽  
Carlos E Vigil ◽  
James E. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Abstract Background: Relapsed/refractory (r/r) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) remains a therapeutic challenge. Although cytarabine arabinoside (AraC) is the most active drug, constituting the backbone of a majority of r/r regimens, the benchmark response to therapy remains a dismal 17 to 20% (Burnett, Wetzler et al. JCO, 2011.). The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide (Len), is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for multiple myeloma and myelodysplasia and has demonstrated activity as a single agent in AML at doses as high as 50 mg for 21 days (d) of a 28 d cycle (Blum et al, JCO, 2010.). Based upon this activity profile we developed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Len in combination with AraC in patients with r/r AML. Methods: Eligible patients were older than 18 years(y), had r/r AML with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status better than 2 and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients were excluded for active CNS disease, uncontrolled infections, congestive heart failure, adrenal insufficiency, anti-cancer therapy within 14 d of enrollment, or prior exposure to Len. All enrolled patients had to practice appropriate contraception. Patients received AraC 1.5 g/m2/d over 3 hours on d 1-5 of a 28 day cycle, with a plan for standard 3+3 Len dose escalation. Initial patients received Len 25 mg on d 6-10 (n= 3), subsequent patients received doses between 25 and 10 mg (dose de-escalation) on d 6-26 with 2 d of rest prior to the next cycle. Following induction, patients who had residual AML (>5%) could receive a second identical course of therapy, provided they demonstrated an improvement in blast percentage relative to baseline. Patients who achieved CR received maintenance with Len 10 mg/d continuously. A 12 patient expanded cohort was enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to assess efficacy. Responses were assessed by International Working Group Criteria for AML (Cheson B et al. JCO, 2003.). Patient Characteristics: Fifty-one patients were consented and 45 were treated on study, 32 of these were evaluable for response, all patients were evaluated for toxicity. Approximately half the patients were female (20/45). The median age was 66 y (range 33-82) and median WBC 2.42x109/L (range 0.18-63.15). Four patients (8%) had an antecedent hematological disorder. By European LeukemiaNet criteria 2 patients (4%) had favorable risk disease, 8 (18%) were Int-1, 12(27%) were Int-2 and 11 (24%) were adverse risk; 12(27%) patients were not evaluable by ELN due to lack of karyotype or molecular data from diagnosis. Twelve patients had primary refractory AML. Results: The MTD for Len given on d 6-26 in combination with AraC at 1.5 g/m2/d x 5 d was 10 mg. Dose de-escalation from the starting dose of 25 mg on this schedule was required due to excess toxicity. The most commonly observed non-hematologic drug related adverse events seen on the study (all < grade 2 unless indicated) were nausea, increased liver function tests (>grade 3), rash (grade >3), hypokalemia (> grade 3) and fatigue. At the 25 mg dose level the dose limiting toxicity was rash, while patients enrolled at the 15 mg dose level experienced dose limiting elevation in LFTs, fatigue and bleeding. Five patients achieved a CR (16%), 5 demonstrated CRi (16%) and there were 3 hematological improvements (HI) for an overall response rate (CR+Cri+HI) of 41% (13/32). The median overall survival (OS) (95% confidence interval) for patients treated on study was 5.8 (2.5, 10.6) months and disease free survival was 3.4 (2.3, 6.2) months. Conclusions: Although prior interesting data support the activity of single agent high dose Len in r/r AML, our single institute phase I study of intermediate dose AraC followed by Len was associated with marked skin and other toxicities at the Len 25 mg dose level, precluding dose escalation to the historically more active 50 mg dose. The CR rate in this study was not dissimilar to previously reported responses with single agent or combination AraC based regimens. Issues of dose and schedule for this combination may have had a significant impact on the potential benefit for these two drugs in combination. Nevertheless, the overall low CR rate from this study does not suggest any superiority for this combination in comparison with the historical single agent response rate for intermediate dose AraC in r/r AML. Disclosures Griffiths: Celgene, Incyte and Alexion: Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Other. Wetzler:MedPace: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sigma Tau: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Plexus: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding.

A Phase I Trial of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in Combination with Rituximab (R) and Bendamustine in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1643-1643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
Beth Christian ◽  
Joseph M. Flynn ◽  
Samantha M. Jaglowski ◽  
Jeffrey Alan Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Irreversible Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Abstract 1643 Introduction: Ibrutinib is an orally available, irreversible inhibitor of BTK, a downstream protein in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway critical for normal B-cell development. In a phase I study in patients with relapsed B-cell malignancies (Fowler ASH 2010), the overall response rate (ORR) was 43%, with responses observed in patients with relapsed mantle cell (MCL), diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), follicular (FL), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). In a phase II single agent study in MCL (Wang ASH 2011), ORR was 67% with several responding patients remaining on ibrutinib over 1 year. Rituximab (R) and bendamustine is a highly active regimen with ORR ranging from 52–92% in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicities, and preliminary efficacy of R-bendamustine in combination with ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL. Methods: Eligibility included patients with relapsed/refractory FL, MZL, MCL, transformed NHL, and DLBCL, and patients with previously untreated MCL not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ANC ≥1000/mm3, platelets ≥50,000/mm3, and creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL were required at study entry. Prior ASCT, rituximab, bendamustine, and ibrutinib were permitted. Treatment consisted of R 375 mg/m2 day 1, bendamustine 90 mg/m2days 1 and 2, and escalating doses of ibrutinib (280 mg or 560 mg) days 1–28 every 28 days for 6 cycles. Six patients were enrolled at each dose level. Responding patients could continue ibrutinib alone after cycle 6 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pegfilgrastim was permitted for patients with grade 4 neutropenia during cycles 1–6. Response was assessed after cycles 3 and 6 by International Harmonization Criteria (Cheson, JCO 2007). Results: Eleven patients (9 males) with a median age of 72 (range 45–84) previously treated with a median of 3 prior therapies (range 0–10) were enrolled. Six patients were refractory to their most recent therapy, 4 patients had prior ASCT, 2 patients had received prior bendamustine, and no patients had prior ibrutinib. Other characteristics included stage III-IV disease in 82%, extranodal involvement in 64%, elevated IPI ≥3 in 55%, bulky adenopathy ≥5 cm in 45%, B-symptoms in 45%, and elevated LDH in 36%. Histologies included MCL (n=3), DLBCL (n=3, all germinal center origin by Hans immunohistochemical criteria), transformed NHL (n=2), FL (n=2), MZL (n=1). Nine patients completed two or more cycles of therapy (median 3, range 1–6) with 280 mg of ibrutinib (n=6) and 560 mg of ibrutinib (n=3). Two patients who discontinued therapy prior to completing cycle 1 for progressive disease (PD) at 280 mg and 560 mg of ibrutinib, respectively, were replaced. Six patients continue to receive protocol treatment. The 5 patients off study included the 2 patients with DLBCL and transformed NHL who were replaced for PD prior to completing cycle 1, 2 patients with DLBCL and PD after cycles 3 and 4, and 1 patient with MCL receiving 280 mg ibrutinib with R-bendamustine who discontinued due to grade 3 neutropenia lasting > 14 days after cycle 4. No DLTs have been observed. Grade 3–4 events included lymphopenia (64%), neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (18%), pancreatitis (9%), vomiting (9%), shingles (9%), and rash (9%). Dose reductions from 280 mg ibrutinib to 140 mg were required in 3 patients for grade 3 thrombocytopenia, pancreatitis, and rash. Bendamustine dose reductions to 60 mg/m2were required in 1 patient for grade 3 thrombocytopenia. ORR was 38% in 8 evaluable patients, with 3 patients currently receiving protocol treatment who have not yet undergone restaging scans. Responses included 2 complete responses and 1 partial response in the 3 patients with MCL. Conclusions: Combined ibrutinib with R-bendamustine appears well tolerated without unexpected toxicity and with preliminary activity in patients with previously untreated and relapsed MCL. Three additional patients will be accrued to the 560 mg dose level and expansion cohorts examining this combination specifically in patients with FL, DLBCL, and MCL are planned. Disclosures: Blum: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ibrutinib is not approved for the treatment of NHL. Jaglowski:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Maddocks:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

A Phase I Study of ENMD-2076 In Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3307-3307
Author(s):  
Karen W.L. Yee ◽  
Hsaio-Wei Tina Chen ◽  
Joseph Brandwein ◽  
Sue Chow ◽  
Deborah Sanfelice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Signaling ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Aurora A Kinase ◽  
Sensitivity Testing ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3307 Background: ENMD-2076 is a novel, orally-active molecule that inhibits Aurora A kinase and FLT3, as well as multiple receptor tyrosine kinases that drive tumor vascularization, including VEGFR2 (KDR), PDGFR and FGFR. A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of ENMD-2076 in patients with refractory hematological malignancies. Methods. Patients (cohorts of 6 evaluable patients per dose level) received escalating doses of ENMD-2076 administered orally daily [225 mg (n=7), 375 mg (n=6), 325 mg (n=9), or 275 mg (n=5)]. Plasma levels of ENMD-2076 were measured on Days 1, 8, & 29 of cycle 1 and at the end of study. Peripheral blood and/or bone marrow were obtained at baseline for ex vivo drug sensitivity testing, and on Days 8 & 29 of cycle 1 for pharmacodynamic (PD) monitoring to assess the effects of ENMD-2076 on cell signaling pathways. The latter flow cytometry-based assay used combined pERK, pAkt, pSTAT5, and pS6 labelling, and tested the effects of acute stimulation with SCF and FLT3 ligands in the presence or absence of pathway inhibitors, including ENMD-2076. Results. Twenty-seven patients have been treated to date (26 AML; 1 CMML-2). Median age is 69 years (range, 43–84 years). Median ECOG status 1 (range, 0 to 2). Eighteen patients (89%) had received prior therapy (median, 2 regimens; range, 0 to 6 regimens); 2 had received a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. A total of 42 cycles have been administered, with a median of 1 cycle (range, 0 to 8 cycles); 10 patients (37%) have received 2 or more cycles of therapy. The most common nonhematological toxicities of any grade, regardless of association with drug, were fatigue, diarrhea, dysphonia, dyspnea, hypertension, constipation, and abdominal pain. Two of 6 patients treated at the 375 mg/day dose level developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), consisting of grade 3 fatigue. The dose was therefore decreased to 325 mg/day; one patient on this dose level developed a DLT with grade 3 fatigue. However, as 2 additional patients subsequently developed grade 2 or 3 fatigue (during cycles 1 and 2, respectively), the 325 mg/day dose was not believed to be tolerable for chronic administration in this patient population. The dose was therefore decreased to 275 mg/day; 2 patients subsequently developed DLTs consisting of grade 3 typhilitis and grade 3 syncope, respectively. Overall, no patient experienced grade 4 toxicities or death from ENMD-2076. Of the 20 evaluable patients, one patient achieved a CRi (transfusion-independent with platelets <100 × 109/L), three a morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) with a major HI-P and/or HI-E, and 4 other patients had an 11%, 14%, 23%, and 65% reduction in marrow blast count, respectively. Ex vivo studies showed that pre-incubation with ENMD-2076 in concentrations in the range of 0.5–2 mM suppressed growth factor stimulation in the blast cells of most patients tested to date. Decreases in the stimulation of ERK, Akt, STAT5, and S6 were seen in the Day 8 & 29 samples, including a striking inhibition of cell signaling in one patient who achieved a CRi. Conclusions. Single agent ENMD-2076 has activity in a heavily pretreated group of AML patients that may correlate with inhibition of ERK, Akt, STAT5, and S6 activity. The recommended phase two dose (RPTD) is 225 mg/day. Enrollment, as well as PK and PD monitoring of this study, is ongoing. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clinical trial investigating ENMD-2076 in patients with relapsed or refractory leukemia. Sidor:EntreMed, Inc.: Employment. Fletcher:EntreMed, Inc.: Employment. Arnott:EntreMed, Inc.: Employment. Bray:EntreMed, Inc.: Employment.

scholarly journals EPCT-19. A PHASE I STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED NON-BIOPSIED DIFFUSE PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPG) AND RB+ BIOPSIED DIPG AND HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS (HGG)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.

Phase I Study of Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin and Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine (ARA-C) in Patients (PTS) with Relapsed and Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Myeloid Blast Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1809-1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajolil ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Farhad Ravandi-Kashani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Acute Leukemias ◽  
First Remission ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Phase I and II clinical studies demonstrated activity of Clofarabine in acute leukemias. In previous studies we have investigated clofarabine, plus ara-C combinations and reported a CR rate of 24% in relapsed AML and 52% in previously untreated AML ≥ 50 years (yrs) with acceptable toxicity profile. Anthracyclines are active in AML. To explore clofarabine further in AML combinations we conducted a phase I study of clofarabine with idarubicin with or without ara-C in pts with relapsed AML, MDS, and CML. Considered as dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are ≥ grade 3 drug-related toxicities. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined by “3+3” dose escalation scheme. On the clofarabine (C)/idarubicin (I) combination (CI), 9 AML pts are enrolled (2 primary refractory, 7 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs (range 24–71). Median first remission duration (CRD1): 3.1 mos. (0–7.6). For the first dose level, C was given at 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d and I at 12mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d. Among the first 6 pts, 2 ≥ gr. 3 toxicities (diarrhea, rash, ↑ bili) occurred necessitating dose de-escalation of C to 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5 and I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3. Among 3 pts, 1 ≥ gr.3 toxicity (↑ bili) was observed. No responses occurred. On the CI + ara-C arm (CIA), 7 AML pts are enrolled (1 primary refractory, 6 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs. (24–78). Median CRD1: 11.2 mos. (0–13.1). First dose level: C 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 1g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 3 pts, 2 developed ≥ gr.3 toxicities (↑ bili, diarrhea) leading to the following de-escalation: C 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 6mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 0.75g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 4 pts (1 ≥ gr. 3 rash, ↑ bili), 3 pts achieved CR. The phase I study is ongoing until determination of DLT and MTD for each arm. Our preliminary results indicate clinical activity of CIA even at the low dose level.

Phase I Study of AVE9633, an AntiCD33-Maytansinoid Immunoconjugate, Administered as an Intravenous Infusion in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4548-4548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Giles ◽  
Rodica Morariu-Zamfir ◽  
John Lambert ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Disulfide Bonds ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Specific Tumor ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract AVE9633 is an immunoconjugate created by conjugation of the cytotoxic maytansinoid, DM4, to the monoclonal IgG1 antibody, huMy9-6 (average of 3.5 molecules of DM4 per antibody). The huMy9-6 antibody is a humanized version of a murine monoclonal antibody, My9-6, which is specific for the CD33 antigen expressed on the surface of myeloid cells, including the majority of cases of AML. Because CD33 has little expression outside the hematopoietic system, it represents an attractive target for antibody-based therapy in patients with AML. The humanized antibody, huMy9-6, binds to the CD33 antigen with an apparent KD in the range of 10−10 M. Maytansinoids are anti-mitotics that inhibit tubulin polymerization and microtubule assembly, inhibiting cells during the G2/M phase of the mitotic cycle. In order to link maytansinoids to antibodies via disulfide bonds, a new thiol-containing maytansinoid (DM4) was synthesized. Attachment of potent maytansinoids to an antibody via disulfide bonds provides a satisfactory stability in the bloodstream. After the conjugate is bound at the specific tumor site it is internalized and the cytotoxic agent is released within the target cell. A phase I study of AVE9633 is being conducted in patients with refractory/relapsed CD33+ AML. The study regimen consists of AVE9633 IV infusion on Day 1 of a 3 weeks cycle. To date dose levels of 15 (N=3), 30 (N=5), 50 (N=4), 75 (N=4), 105 (N=2), 200 (N=3) and 260 (N=1) mg/m2 have been investigated. Hypersensitivity reactions during perfusion were noted, requiring prophylaxis with steroids. No other AVE9633- attributable extramedullary Grade 3 AE has been observed to date. Free DM4, measured by LC/MS/MS was detectable from the 75 mg/m2 dose level; its Cmax (at the end of infusion) increased from 10 ng/mL at the 75 mg/m2 dose level to 70 ng/mL at 200 mg/m2. Neither AVE9633-associated myelosuppression nor responses have been noted. Using Flow Cytometry Assay on peripheral blasts and monocytes, total saturation and down regulation of CD33 were observed following administration of doses ≥ 30 mg/m2. AVE9633 exposure (measuring, by ELISA method, all antibodies containing at lease one molecule of DM4) increased proportionally with the administered dose in the dose range 15 to 200 mg/m2. Updated PK results and potential explanations for the lack of efficacy using this treatment schedule will be presented.

Phase I dose and schedule finding study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (D) and weekly docetaxel (T)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12012-12012 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shaye ◽  
A. B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
A. Garcia ◽  
D. Wei ◽  
S. Groshen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Salivary Gland Carcinomas ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

12012 Background: The combination of D and T has many potential applications, particularly in breast and ovarian cancers. A phase 3 trial is examining D + T versus T in first-line metastatic breast cancer ( NCT00091442 ). D has better tumor localization and penetration in solid tumors than conventional doxorubicin. In previous studies, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was identified as D 30 mg/m2 and T 75 mg/m2 q4 weeks (wks), with a recommended dose and schedule of D 30 mg/m2 and T 60 mg/m2 q3wks without G-CSF. We conducted a phase I study to determine the MTD of D with weekly T. Our hypothesis was that the lower incidence of myelosuppression with weekly T would allow for higher doses of both drugs. Methods: There were 2 schedules. Arm A: D q4wks starting at 25 mg/m2 with weekly T for 3 wks starting at 30 mg/m2. Arm B: D q2wks starting at 15 mg/m2 with weekly T for 3 wks starting at 30 mg/m2. One cycle was 28 days. Standard 3+3 design was used with MTD defined as the highest dose level causing dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in ≥ 2/6 patients (pts). Results: 32 pts were treated; 13 females, 19 males, median age of 60 years. Median number of cycles administered was 2 (1–13) with a median follow-up of 11.5 months. Tumor types included lung (16%), thyroid (9%), esophagus (9%), nasopharynx, breast, colorectal, stomach and kidney (6% each). Arm A (13 pts) was closed after 2/7 evaluable pts at dose level 2 (D 33mg/m2; T 30 mg/m2) experienced DLT in the form of grade 3 stomatitis. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (3/13), stomatitis (3/13) and fatigue (3/13). Arm B accrued 19 pts. The trial was closed at the highest planned dose in Arm B (D 20mg/m2 q2wks and T 35 mg/m2 weekly) with only 1/6 evaluable pts experiencing DLT in the form of grade 4 fatigue and weakness. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities in Arm B included neutropenia (5/19 pts), fatigue (5/19 pts) and stomatitis (2/19 pts). There was no grade 3/4 hand-foot syndrome or cardiotoxicity. 2 partial responses were observed in nasopharyngeal and salivary gland carcinomas, with 13 pts achieving stable disease. Conclusions: The combination of D q2 wks and T weekly for 3/4 wks is well tolerated and results in a higher dose intensity of both drugs than in previously evaluated regimens. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of tirapazamine in combination with radiation and weekly cisplatin in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5543-5543
Author(s):  
D. Rischin ◽  
K. Narayan ◽  
A. Oza ◽  
L. Mileshkin ◽  
D. Bernshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

5543 Background and Purpose: Hypoxia is an adverse prognostic factor in locoregionally advanced cervical cancer treated with radiation. GOG are currently studying the hypoxic cytotoxin, tirapazamine (TPZ) in combination with biweekly intermediate dose cisplatin (CIS) and radiation in a large phase III trial. The aim of this phase I study was to develop a better tolerated regimen that added TPZ to the standard regimen of radiation and weekly low dose CIS. Methods: Eligible patients had previously untreated carcinoma of the cervix, Stages IB2 - IVA. The starting schedule was radiotherapy (45 to 50.4 Gy external beam radiation followed by brachytherapy), with concomitant weekly CIS 40 mg/m2 weeks 1–6 and weekly TPZ 290 mg/m2 (prior to CIS) in weeks 1–5. Results: Between 3/05 and 7/06 eleven patients were enrolled, median age (range) 52 (31–65), squamous cell carcinoma 10, adenocarcinoma 1, 1B2–5, IIA-1, IIB-3, IIIB- 1, IVA-1. The first 2 patients on dose level 1 experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT), one grade 3 ALT (SGPT) elevation and grade 4 pulmonary embolism and one grade 3 ototoxicity. Doses were decreased to dose level -1 CIS 30 mg/m2 and TPZ 260 mg/m2. Three patients were treated without any DLTs. Six patients were then treated on dose level -1a, CIS 35 mg/m2 and TPZ 260 mg/m2, with 2 DLTs: grade 3 neutropenia with dose omission and grade 4 pulmonary embolism with major hemodynamic compromise. The sixth patient on dose level -1a withdrew from the trial in week 2 after being advised about the DLTs observed on this dose level. 3 additional patients will be accrued on dose level -1 to confirm safety of this dose level. One patient has relapsed in pelvic nodes, all other patients remain disease-free with a median followup of 10 months (range 5 - 21) Conclusions: The combination of weekly TPZ and CIS with radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer was associated with more toxicity than anticipated with the recommended dose level being TPZ 260 mg/m2, CIS 30 mg/m2. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

ITCC phase I study of erlotinib as single agent in children with refractory and relapsed malignant brain tumors and in combination with irradiation in newly diagnosed brain stem glioma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9556-9556 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Geoerger ◽  
D. Hargrave ◽  
A. Ndiaye ◽  
D. Frappaz ◽  
F. Doz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Glioneuronal Tumor ◽  
Brain Stem Glioma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

9556 Background: Erlotinib hydrochloride (OSI-774), a selective inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase, may be active in childhood brain tumors, particularly in combination with irradiation. Methods: Multicenter, non-randomized phase I study with separate dose findings for erlotinib as single agent in children with refractory or relapsing brain tumors (group 1), and combined to irradiation in newly diagnosed brain stem glioma (group 2). Erlotinib was administered orally daily at 75, 100, 125 or 150 mg/m2. Dose escalation was performed in a classical 3+3 methodology for group 1 and according to the continuous reassessment method for group 2; dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated at 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. Results: In total, 31 patients have been entered to date, 30 received treatment, 17 in group 1 (3 relapsing brain stem glioma, 4 ependymoma, 4 oligodendroglioma, 6 other) and 13 in group 2 with a median age of 9 and 6 years (range 4–16 and 2–12), respectively. Median treatment duration was 1.5 and >5 months, respectively. In group 1, 3 patients each were treated at 75 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2, 7 at 125 mg/m2, 4 at 150 mg/m2. One patient with a glioneuronal tumor treated at 125 mg/m2 experienced G5 intra-tumoral hemorrhage at day 4 which was considered as DLT; at 150 mg/m2, 1 patient with an oligodendroglioma experienced G3 asthenia at day 18 and G3 intratumoral hemorrhage at day 29, and 1 patient with an ependymoma experienced G5 intra-tumoral hemorrhage at day 49. In group 2, 1/6 patients treated with erlotinib 75 mg/m2 and irradiation experienced seizures and died, no DLT occurred in 6 patients at 100 mg/m2. Non-hematological toxicities included G1-G2 erythema, folliculitis, dry skin, trichomegaly, G1 transaminitis, bilirubinemia, G1–3 asthenia, G1–5 intra-tumoral hemorrhage. Minor tumor response was observed in an oligodendroglioma. Pharmacokinetic and biological evaluations are ongoing. Conclusions: Erlotinib was well tolerated in children with cutaneous symptoms being the most frequent treatment toxicity. However, neurological toxicity and intra-tumoral hemorrhage was notable in these children with brain tumors. Inclusion at 125 mg/m2 is ongoing to confirm the MTD. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of tipifarnib and sorafenib in patients with biopsiable advanced cancers (NCI protocol 7156 supported by NCI grant UO1 CA062461)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3549-3549 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Hong ◽  
L. Camacho ◽  
C. Ng ◽  
J. Wright ◽  
R. A. Newman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Grade 3

3549 Background: The Ras and Raf kinases are sequential signaling proteins in the MAPK pathway and inhibition of both targets may confer synergistic effects, particularly in tumors with activation of either kinase through mutation or other mechanisms. Therefore, we sought to combine sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor (Raf, VEGFR, PDGFR) and tipifarnib an inhibitor of farnesyltransferase that is critical for Ras activity in a phase I study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and tumor response. Methods: The trial was a phase I trial of advanced cancer patients(pts) with a conventional dose escalation design. Each cycle consisted of 28 days of sorafenib and 21 days of tipifarnib. Dose levels are listed in the table . Results: To date, a total of 27 pts have been enrolled (median age 54.5 yrs, M:F 1:1. 3 RCC, 3 breast, 4 sarcoma, 4 melanoma, 3 CRC, 4 thyroid, 2 H&N, one thymic, one adrenal cortical, one SCC of the lung, and one unknown primary SCC). Two pts developed grade 3 DLT-skin rash on the first dosing level (tipifarnib at 100 mg po BID and sorafenib at 400 mg po BID). Dose escalation was modified as per table below. At dose level 4, 2/5 pts entered experienced a DLT of grade 3 rash and grade 3 drug fever, therefore MTD has been determined to be tipifarnib 100 mg BID, sorafenib 400 mg qam, 200 mg qpm. The most common treatment related toxicities included lymphopenia (18), hyperglycemia (17), and skin rash (14). Currently, 19 of the 27 pts are evaluable; 13 pts had SD (8–44 weeks); 2 RCC pts for 32 weeks, an adrenal cortical ca pt for 32 weeks, one melanoma pt for 44 weeks. PK analysis suggested findings similar to single agent PK profiles, no PK interactions were apparent. Conclusions: Significant toxicity with the combination of these two agents, even doses well below single agent maximum levels were observed. The MTD was determined to be tipifarnib at 100 mg BID, sorafenib at 400 mg qam, 200 mg qpm. PK analysis, to date show,no pharmacokinetic interaction between tipifarnib and sorafenib. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document