Activity and Tolerability of Azacitidine in Patients Who Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplasia (MDS): a Survey from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT

Abstract Disease relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure after allo-SCT for high risk AML and MDS. Treatment options for patients with recurrent disease are extremely limited and re-induction chemotherapy, when administered, is often either poorly tolerated or ineffective. Azacitidine (AZA) is a DNMT inhibitor which is well tolerated and clinically active in high risk AML/MDS. Of interest AZA also up-regulates the expression of tumor antigens and plausibly augments a graft-versus-leukemia effect. A number of small studies have suggested clinical activity of AZA in patients who relapse after an allograft for AML/MDS but both overall response rate and predictors of response remain unknown. We report the first systematic study of the activity and tolerability of AZA in patients who relapsed after allo-SCT for AML/MDS. 204 patients who relapsed at a median of 6.5 months (range, 1-49) after an allograft for AML (n=130) or MDS (n=74) were studied. The median age was 58 years (range 22-76). 89 patients were transplanted using a matched sibling donor and 115 from an adult unrelated donor. 47 patients received a myeloablative and 157 a reduced intensity conditioning regimen. AZA was administered for 5-7 consecutive days every month. The median duration of AZA treatment was 68 days (inter-quartile range 24-154 days). 66 patients received additional donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) at a median of 43 days after commencement of AZA. AZA was well tolerated in the majority of patients. 57 patients developed Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicities 47 of which were infectious complications and likely also attributable to relapsed disease. 4 patients developed Grade 3-4 acute GVHD after AZA treatment. 45 (22%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or partial remission after AZA administration at a median of 114 days after commencement of treatment. 31 (15%) patients achieved a CR. The median number of courses of AZA to achieve a clinical response was three. In multivariable analysis the only significant factor determining improved response to AZA was relapse occurring more than 12 months post-transplant. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 6 months after the commencement of AZA therapy. In patients who achieved a CR the 2 year OS after commencement of AZA was 38.5% versus 11% for the whole population (p= 0.001). In multivariable analysis OS was determined by the occurrence of disease relapse more than 6 months post-transplant and achievement of a CR after AZA therapy. Of note, there was no significant difference in response rates to AZA between patients with relapsed AML or MDS. Concurrent administration of DLI did not improve either response or survival rates. In conclusion, these data confirm the ability of AZA to salvage a proportion of patients with AML or MDS who relapse after an allogeneic SCT and identify prognostic factors of response. The response and survival rates achieved with salvage AZA are comparable to those previously reported with either intensive chemotherapy or DLI. We conclude AZA represents an important and relatively well-tolerated new treatment option in the management of selected patients with AML and MDS who relapse after allo-SCT. Disclosures Craddock: Celgene: Grants Other, Honoraria. Kroger:Celgene: Research Funding. Mohty:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Maintenance Therapy with 5-Azacytidine (5-AC) after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): A Dose and Schedule Finding Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.3668.3668 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 3668-3668 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Andres O. Soriano ◽

Richard Champlin ◽

Gloria McCormick ◽

Sergio Giralt ◽

Peter Thall ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Mononuclear Cells ◽

Methylation Status ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Surrogate Marker ◽

Dose Schedule ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Post Transplant

Abstract Background: Relapse is the most frequent cause of treatment failure after allo-SCT in patients (pts) with AML or MDS. Median time to relapse after reduced-intensity allo-SCT is 3–5 months, indicating that if post-transplant interventions are to be proposed, they have to be implemented early. 5-AC is a DNA hypomethylating agent that may induce leukemic cell differentiation and increased immunogenicity, therefore potentially increasing the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Furthermore, lower doses are likely to be better tolerated after allo-SCT and to be as effective as larger doses in inducing hypomethylation. We hypothesized that 5-AC after allo-SCT will result in lower relapse rates, and designed a phase I clinical trial to determine the safest dose and schedule combination of 5-AC used as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT in pts with AML or MDS. Methods: Pts with AML or high-risk MDS not in first remission are eligible. Donors are HLA-compatible related or unrelated. Conditioning regimen is gemtuzumab ozogamicin 2 mg/m2 (day -12), fludarabine, and melphalan 140 mg/m2. GVHD prophylaxis is tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate. ATG is administered to recipients of unrelated donor transplants. Three doses of 5-AC are to be studied: 8, 16, and 24 mg/m2 daily × 5 starting on day 42 post transplant. Four schedules consisting of 1, 2, 3 or 4 28-day courses of 5-AC are being explored for a total of 3×4 = 12 dose-schedule combinations. The continual reassessment method with toxicity probabilities is used to determine the safest dose schedule combination. Results: Twelve pts were evaluable. Median age was 55.5 years (range 25–66). Eight pts had AML and 4 had MDS. At the time of the transplant 4 pts were in remission and 8 had refractory disease. Donors were HLA compatible related (n=7) and unrelated (n=5). Based on the Bayesian model, 3 pts (25 %) were assigned to 8 mg/m2 × 1 cycle, 2 pts (16%) to 8 mg/m2× 2 cycles, 2 (16%) to 8 mg/m2× 3 cycles and 3 to 16 mg/m2×3 cycles. All evaluable pts have received the assigned 5AC doses, and there has been no major drug-related toxicity (at 8 or 16 mg/m2). Two pts died before receiving 5-AC due to bleeding (n=1, in CR) and bacterial sepsis (n=1) post allo-SCT. With a median follow up of 5 months (2–9) after allo-SCT, none of the pts has relapsed and no drug related induction of GVHD has been observed. All pts were 100% donor chimeras at start of 5AC. To assess the DNA hypomethylating effect of 5-AC, the methylation status of long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE) was analyzed by pyrosequencing and used as a surrogate marker of global DNA methylation in mononuclear cells of 7 patients that have completed 1 cycle at the dose of 8 mg/m2. Mean LINE methylation pretreatment was 64.9%(±5), while it was 60.7%(±2.5) by day 5 (p=0.06) (last day of 5-AC administration), returning to baseline by day 1 of the next cycle. Analysis of gene specific methylation is ongoing. Conclusions: At the dose of 8 mg/m2 5AC is well tolerated and may produce detectable levels of hypomethylation. It is unknown if this effect will translate in reduced relapse rate or if higher doses will be as well tolerated.

Download Full-text

Alemtuzumab Plus Oral Dexamethasone, Followed by Alemtuzumab Maintenance or Allogeneic Transplantation in Ultra High-Risk CLL: Interim Analysis of a Phase II Study of the GCLLSG and fcgcll/MW

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2854.2854 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2854-2854 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽

Florence Cymbalista ◽

Véronique Leblond ◽

Alain Delmer ◽

Dirk Winkler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Long Term Results ◽

High Dose ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Ultra High Risk ◽

Grade 3 ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2854 Alemtuzumab (A) proved to be efficacious in CLL patients (pts) with very poor prognosis, either due to fludarabine (F) refractoriness or due to unfavorable cytogenetics (17p-). However, rate and duration of remissions still remain unsatisfactory. Therefore, the French and German CLL study groups jointly embarked on this trial, trying to achieve higher overall response rates (ORR) by adding high-dose dexamethasone (D) to A and, simultaneously, investigating the consolidation effect of prolonged A maintenance or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT), respectively. Induction treatment consisted of subcutaneous A 30 mg weekly × 3 for 28 days, combined with oral D 40 mg on days 1–4 and 15–18, and prophylactic pegfilgrastim 6 mg on days 1 and 15. Depending on the remission status, pts were treated for up to 12 weeks. If CR was documented at 4 or 8 weeks, or at least SD was achieved at 12 weeks, consolidation was scheduled with either allo-SCT or A maintenance with 30 mg every 14 days for up to 2 years (y), at the discretion of pt and physician. Between January 2008 and July 2011, 124 pts were recruited at 26 centers, 120 of whom were eligible. Pts were generally subdivided into three cohorts: 55 pts were refractory (i.e. no response or relapse within 6 months) to regimens containing F or a similar drug (i.e. pentostatin, cladribine, bendamustine). Non-refractory pts all exhibited 17p- and had either untreated (n=39) or relapsed CLL (n = 26) requiring therapy. The median age was high with 66/64/66 y in 17p- 1st line, 17p- relapse, and F-refractory pts, respectively. The three cohorts had 46/54/75% Binet C disease, 41/35/27% B symptoms, 38/42/53% reduced performance status (ECOG 1/2), median thymidine kinase levels of 35/49/24 U/L, median ß2MG levels of 3.8/5.5/4.6 mg/L, and IGHV was unmutated in 89/96/87%. In the F-refractory group, 53% exhibited 17p deletion and 22% had 11q deletion. Pretreated patients had received a median of 3 (F-refractory) or 2 prior lines (17p- relapse). 5 pts had previously undergone autologous and 1 pt allo-SCT. Treatment and efficacy data are currently available for 87 pts who completed induction therapy :17p- 1st-line (n=30), 17p- relapse (n=17), and F-refractory (n=40). Of these, 80/53/55% received the full induction of 12 weeks. ORR (best observed status) was generally high with 97/76/70%. CR was achieved in 20/0/5%. After a median follow-up of 11.8 months (mo), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.9/10.4/8.4 mo. Deaths are recorded in 13/27/36% of pts, with median overall survival (OS) not yet reached (>24 mo) in the 17p- 1st line group, and 15/12 mo in 17p- relapse/F-refractory pts. Consolidation treatment was performed as maintenance A (median duration 32 weeks, range 2 – 89) in 34%, and allo-SCT in 30%, with a median age of 66 and 61 y in these subgroups. The main reasons for going off-study without consolidation were death due to infection (14%, n=11, of these 6 without response, and 10 in the F-refractory cohort), CLL progression (12%), and other toxicity (5%). Among the 28 pts not receiving consolidation, there were 19 (68%) deaths, 15 of them in the F-refractory cohort. When comparing A maintenance and allo-SCT for consolidation, there were 9 (35%) and 7 (30%) PD events, respectively and there was so far no significant difference in PFS (median 17 mo in both groups) or OS. During induction, grade 3/4 hematotoxicity consisted of anemia in 28%, neutropenia in 47%, and thrombopenia in 44%. Grade 3/4 non-CMV infection occurred in 29% of 17p- 1st-line, 15% of 17p- relapsed, and 56% of F-refractory pts. CMV reactivation was observed in 54/25/40%, without severe sequelae recorded. During A maintenance, grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of neutropenia in 39% pts and thrombopenia in 4% pts with 6 SAEs (ITP, diarrhea, infection, erythema, tachycardia, and thrombosis). Conclusions: The combination of A and D shows high response rates in ultra high-risk CLL, with promising preliminary findings for PFS and OS, despite the high median age of the pts. The results compare favorably to ORR/CR of 68%/5%, and median PFS of 11.3 mo in the 17p- subgroup of the CLL8 study treated with FCR, consisting of younger pts (median 61 y). In F-refractory CLL however, when compared to the preceding CLL2H study with single agent A, the improved initial response by adding dexamethasone does not seem to translate into improved long-term results. More mature follow-up is needed, especially with respect to the impact of allo-SCT. Disclosures: Stilgenbauer: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Alemtuzumab in 1st line CLL treatment. Cymbalista:Roche (d) Mundipharma (e) Genzyme (e): Honoraria, Research Funding. Hinke:WiSP (CRO): Employment.

Download Full-text

The Combination of Pixantrone, Etoposide, Bendamustine and, in CD20+ Tumors, Rituximab (PREBEN) Shows Promising Feasibility/Efficacy in Heavily Pre-Treated Aggressive Lymphomas of B- and T-Cell Phenotype - Results of the Pre-Trial Experience Leading to a Nordic Phase 1/2 Study (the PREBEN Trial)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1782.1782 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1782-1782 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Michael Roost Clausen ◽

Sirpa Leppa ◽

Peter de Nully Brown ◽

Jette Soenderskov Goerloev ◽

Michael Panny ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Life Sciences ◽

Cell Phenotype ◽

Allogeneic Transplant ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL) relapsing after high-dose therapy or, in not transplant-eligible patients, after 1st-line chemotherapy represents an unmet clinical need. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating a salvage combination regimen based on pixantrone, an aza-anthracenadione recently approved in Europe for patients with multiply relapsed aNHL. Etoposide and bendamustine were chosen as companion compounds due to available feasibility data in combination with anthracenadions, and a well-documented efficacy in salvage regimens for relapsed aNHL. Rituximab was added, if the relapse tumor biopsy was CD20+. Aim: The aim of the present analysis was to summarize the preliminary clinical experience with the PREBEN/PEBEN regimen gathered, on a compassionate need basis, at different European sites and representing the platform for a currently ongoing Nordic phase 1/2 trial in relapsed aNHL. Methods: The adopted schedule consisted of pixantrone 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1+8, etoposide 100 mg i.v. day 1, bendamustine 90 mg i.v. day 1 with or without the addition of rituximab 375 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 (PREBEN/PEBEN). If feasible, each cycle was given at 3-weekly intervals for a maximum of 6 cycles. All patients were assessed for chemosensitivity with PET/CT, already after cycle 1 or 2. G-CSF support was applied and administered according to local practice. Results: A total of 30 heavily pre-treated patients (19 males and 11 females, age range 49-81 yrs; mean N of previous regimens: 3, range 1-7) with aNHL were treated according to the PREBEN/PEBEN schedule. Seventeen had diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), six transformed indolent (tIND), and seven peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). All patients had intermediate or high risk IPI prior to start of salvage therapy. Eight patients (27%) had a complete metabolic response (CMR) and seven (23%) a partial one (PMR), resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 50%. Among the histological subtypes, the patients with DLBCL, PTCL and tIND had an ORR of 53% (CMR 35%), 57% (CMR 14%), and 33% (CMR in one out of two responders), respectively. Most responses were achieved early (prior to course nr. 4). Response durations ranged between 2 and 23+ months. Among the 17 patients with DLBCL, nine were frail, non transplant-eligible with relapsed disease, six had primary refractory lymphoma progressing through anthracycline-containing 1st line and platinum-containing salvage therapies, and two had relapses occurring after a post-transplant remission period. While most of the relapsed patients with DLBCL responded , i.e. seven (five CMR and two PMR) of the nine (78%) frail relapsed patients and one of the two (50%) patients with post-transplant relapses, only one out six (17%) primary refractory patients exhibited some chemosensitivity. Interestingly, four out of seven PTCL patients achieved a PMR or CMR allowing them to undergo non-myeloablative allogeneic transplant with subsequent sustained response durations. The treatment schedule was feasible and most patients received it on an out-patient basis. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was of hematological type (mainly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia), occurring in 52% of the patients. Grade 3-4 infections were observed at a frequency of 21%. No septic deaths were recorded. A previously anthracycline exposed, heavily pre-treated 60-year old female PTCL patient developed symptomatic congestive heart failure effectively reversed by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors with normalization of the myocardial ejection fraction. One previously ibritumomab tiuxetan exposed, heavily pretreated patient with tIND developed acute myeloid leukemia with therapy-related cytogenetic features. Conclusions: The PREBEN/PEBEN salvage regimen was feasible in a heavily pre-treated cohort of elderly patients with high-risk aNHL. In individual patients it elicited substantial and durable responses early in the course of therapy. In some younger patients, it proved useful as bridging strategy to a non-myeloablative allogeneic transplant. A phase 1/2 study in relapsed (non-refractory) aNHL was launched in June 2016 (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02678299; EudraCT number: 2015-000758-39) and is currently accruing (N=5 pr. Aug 1st, 2016). Disclosures Clausen: Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Travel expences; Abbvie: Other: Travel expences. Leppa:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; CTI Life Sciences: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Merck: Other: Travel expenses. Willenbacher:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; European Commision: Research Funding. d'Amore:Servier: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Boards; CTI LIfe Sciences: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Boards.

Download Full-text

Survival after T-Cell Replete Haplo-Identical Related Donor Transplant Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Compared with Matched Unrelated Donor Transplant for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.679.679 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 679-679 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Stefan O. Ciurea ◽

Mei-Jie Zhang ◽

Andrea Bacigalupo ◽

Asad Bashey ◽

Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Reduced Intensity ◽

Donor Transplant

Abstract Background: Increasing numbers of haplo-identical transplants are being performed and the most common approach in the United States includes transplantation of an unmanipulated graft with tacrolimus, mycophenolate and post-transplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis. In this analysis we compare the early outcomes after haplo-identical transplantation with this GVHD prophylaxis with that after conventional HLA-matched unrelated donor transplant approaches (MUD). Methods: Included are 2174 patients with AML aged 21-70 years and transplanted between 2008 and 2012. Cox regression models were built for recipients of myeloablative (N=1245 MUD compared with N=104 haplo-identical) and reduced intensity (N=737 MUD compared with 88 haplo-identical) conditioning transplants. Primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival. With median follow-ups of 2-3 years, surviving patients in all treatment groups were censored at 2-years. Results: Characteristics of recipients of myeloablative transplantation were similar across the two treatment groups except peripheral blood (PB) was the predominant graft with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with methotrexate the predominant GVHD prophylaxis for the MUD group compared to predominantly BM grafts with CNI, mycophenolate and post-transplant cyclophosphamide for the haplo-identical group. Most regimens were non-irradiation containing, 74% for MUD and 78% for haplo-identical transplants. Characteristics of recipients of reduced intensity conditioning transplants differed by treatment groups; recipients of MUD transplants were older (median age 62 vs. 57 years), more likely to report performance score 80 or lower, be in first complete remission at transplantation and shorter interval from diagnosis to transplantation. PB was the predominant graft for MUD and BM, for haplo-identical transplants. The conditioning regimen for reduced intensity haplo-identical transplants was uniform (TBI 200 cGy, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine) and for MUD transplants, it was predominantly an alkylating agent and fludarabine (79%). Day-30 cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery was higher after myeloabative MUD compared with haplo-identical transplants (97% vs. 90%, p=0.01). Neutrophil recovery was not different after MUD and haplo-identical reduced intensity conditioning transplants (96% vs. 93%, p=0.25). Table 1 shows the results of multivariate analysis for non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse and overall survival. Overall survival is not significantly different after haplo-identical and MUD transplants with either the myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning approaches. The 2-year survival rates adjusted for age, disease status and interval from diagnosis to transplant after myeloablative MUD and haplo-identical transplantation were 54% (95% CI 51-57) and 47% (95% CI 37-57), respectively (p=0.22). The corresponding 2-year survival rates after reduced intensity conditioning transplantation were 49% (95% CI 45-53) and 53% (95% CI 42-63), p=0.25. We also explored for difference in survival with in vivo T-cell depletion in the myeloablative (HR 0.81, p=0.19) and reduced intensity (HR 1.18, p=0.33) MUD groups compared with the corresponding haplo-identical groups (baseline HR 1.00) and found none. We tested for a transplant center effect on survival and found none. Conclusion: With the available data, 2-year survival rates for AML after myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning transplants are comparable after conventional MUD transplant approaches and haplo-identical transplant with the post-transplant cyclophosphamide approach. Longer follow-up of haplo-identical transplant recipients as well as confirmation of these findings in a larger population, are needed before wide spread adoption of selecting haplo-identical donors over HLA-matched unrelated donors. Table Transplant Conditioning Regimen Outcomes Myeloablative Hazard Ratio Reduced intensity Hazard Ratio NRM Haplo-identical 1.00 1.00 MUD 1.07; p=0.82 2.35; p=0.03 Relapse Haplo-identical 1.00 1.00 MUD 0.88; p=0.40 0.76; p=0.09 Survival Haplo-identical 1.00 1.00 MUD 0.93; p=0.61 1.13; p=0.46 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Age on the Outcome of Primary Treatment for Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: 70 Years of Age Is a Clinical Relevant Cutpoint and the Most Important Predictor of Overall Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130282 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1559-1559

Author(s):

Lourdes Calvente ◽

Manjula Maganti ◽

Mary Gospodarowicz ◽

David C. Hodgson ◽

Danielle Rodin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Treatment Outcomes ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Age Group ◽

Grade 3 ◽

The Impact

Introduction: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) typically affects younger patients but 15-35% are >60 years. The age used to define an elderly population has varied but age 60 is frequently used. A clinically relevant definition of older age could be based on the use of alternate treatments due to different efficacy and/or toxicity. Treatment outcomes may also be influenced by tumor biology and patient comorbidity that vary with age. We evaluated the effect of age on treatment outcomes in cHL. Methods: All cHL patients treated at our centre between Jan 1999 and Dec 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data were obtained from prospectively collected Lymphoma database and additional data was manually retrieved. Treatment for localized disease was combined modality (2-4 cycles of ABVD and potentially 6 cycles for bulk disease > 10 cm; radiation doses 20-35 Gy) with advanced disease typically receiving chemotherapy alone (ABVD 6-8 cycles). Older patients received individualized treatment. We used the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), (Sorror Blood 2005) as the elements can be abstracted retrospectively. Results: 607 patients were identified; 14% were >60 years and 6% were age >70. Baseline characteristics are outlined in table 1. Patients >70 presented more frequently with high-risk HCT-CI and worse ECOG PS. Patients > 60 presented more frequently with advanced stage (61-70 age group: 40%; >70 years: 46%). 65% of the patients age >70 presented with an IPS of >3. Chemotherapy alone approaches were used more commonly in older patients (age 61-70: 40%; age 70+: 51%) than in those <60 years (25%). Within the whole cohort 12 patients received non-anthracycline based treatment (<60: n=4; 61-70: n=1; and >70: n=7).For patients <60 and >70 this decision was made due to prior comorbidities that precluded the use of standard treatment, and for the patient in the 61-70 was because of acute toxicity with ABVD-based chemotherapy. Treatment was discontinued in 33% of the patients > 70 (77% due to toxicity), 21% in the 61-70 years group (30% toxicity) and 6% in patients <60 (29% toxicity). Patients > 70 had higher rates of grade 3-5 febrile neutropenia (28% versus 15% [age 61-70] and 7% [age <60]). Bleomycin toxicity was more common in older patients (age >70: grade 3-4 events 12% of the patients with discontinuation in 66%; age 61-70: 13% with discontinuation rate of 20%) compared to a 1% rate of grade 3-5 events in age <60. There was a grade 5 episode of febrile neutropenia in >70 group and 1 death related to bleomycin in age <60. With a median follow up of 8.6 years, the 10-year OS and PFS were 80.5% and 71.2%, respectively. By age-group, the 10-year OS was 88% (<60 years), 57% (61-70 years) and 15% (age >70 years); (p<0.001) (Figure 1a-b). In multivariable analysis for OS, age 61-70 (HR 2.44, p=0.002) and age >70 (HR 5.72, p=0.001), non-anthracycline based chemotherapy (HR 3.69, p<0.001), high-risk HCT-CI (HR 3.03, p=0.001) and ECOG 2-4 (HR 1.8, p=0.017), were significant. Age >70, type of chemotherapy, high-risk HCT-CI, and advanced stage were significant for PFS in the multivariable analysis (Table 2a-b). Death due to disease or toxicity at 10 years was 13.6% (age <60: 9.7%, 61-70 years: 23.2%; and for age > 70: 50.7%; [p=<0.001]) (Figure 2a-b). Multivariable analysis for cause-specific survival identified age >70 years (HR 4.04, p=<0.001), extranodal disease (HR 2.57, p=0.001) and ECOG 2-4 (HR 2.10, p=0.010) as significant predictors(Table 3). Conclusions: Age >70 years is a clinically relevant age cutoff as it has additional prognostic significance and greater rates of treatment discontinuation and toxicity compared to age 60. The HCT-CI is a useful predictor of outcome in cHL and should be validated prospectively. In multivariable analysis, age, type of treatment, comorbidity and ECOG performance status are independent predictors of OS. Further studies are ongoing to validate these findings and assess biologic differences in older versus younger cHL patients. Disclosures Tsang: Nordic Nanovector: Research Funding. Kridel:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Prica:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Kuruvilla:Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Older Age As a Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival for Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Upfront Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114200 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2144-2144

Author(s):

David M. Cordas Dos Santos ◽

Rima M. Saliba ◽

Romil Patel ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

Chitra Hosing ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Older Age ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Cart Analysis ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is considered the standard of care for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Due to improvements in induction, stem cell mobilization, and dose adjustment of the conditioning regimen, auto-HCT is increasingly used in older MM patients, with several retrospective analyses showing similar clinical outcomes compared to younger patients. Methods To further confirm these results, we performed a single-center retrospective analysis of MM patients undergoing auto-HCT between January 2006 and December 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: older (> 70 years) and younger (≤ 70 years). Results 1128 patients (182 older, 946 younger) were included in this analysis. Patient characteristics are summarized in the attached Table. More patients (59% vs. 45%, p = 0.01) in the older cohort had ISS stage II or III disease. Older cohort was more likely to receive reduced-dose melphalan (140 mg/m²) as conditioning regimen (32% vs 3%, p = <0.0001). There was no significant difference in high-risk cytogenetics, induction regimens, and response to induction, or post-transplant maintenance between the older and younger cohorts. The overall median follow-up among survivors was 49 months in the older and 52 months in the younger group. One-hundred-day non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2/182 (1.1%) and 6/946 (0.6%) (p = 0.5) in the older and younger groups, respectively. However, 1-year NRM was significantly higher in the older vs. younger cohort (7 /182 (4%; unknown 3, pneumonia or respiratory failure 4) vs. 9/946 (1%; unknown 2, pneumonia or respiratory failure 4, cardiac failure 3), HR 4.1, p = 0.005). Post-transplant, 75 (41%) and 431 (45%) achieved complete remission (CR) in the older and younger groups, respectively (p = 0.29). There was no significant difference in the rate of disease progression post-transplant between older (31%) and younger (30%) groups (p = 0.3). The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) was 24% and 37% in the older and younger groups, respectively (HR 1.3, p = 0.02). Similarly, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 56% and 73% in the older and younger groups (HR 1.8, p = <0.001). In univariate analyses, age > 70 years, high-risk cytogenetics, serum creatinine level > 2 mg/dl and ISS stage III were associated with worse PFS and OS. In contrast, melphalan 200 mg/m² for conditioning and achievement of CR after induction therapy were associated with better PFS and OS. These 6 factors were studied in multivariate analyses using a classification and regression tree (CART) method. In CART analysis for PFS, ISS stage II or III, and high-risk cytogenetics were associated with shorter PFS. Similarly, in CART analysis for OS, older age (> 69 years), ISS stage II or III, and high-risk cytogenetics were associated with a shorter OS. Conclusion In this large single-center analysis, there was no difference in 100-day NRM, CR rates and the risk of progression after auto-HCT between the older and the younger patients. However, older age was associated with a shorter PFS and OS due to increased NRM. On multivariate CART analysis, ISS stage II or III and high-risk cytogenetics were associated with a worse PFS and OS, while age > 69 years was associated with a worse OS only. The impact of comorbidities on NRM is being evaluated in ongoing analyses. Disclosures Lee: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel:Abbvie: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Thomas:Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding. Orlowski:BioTheryX, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Superior Outcomes with Fludarabine-Busulfan (Flu/Bu) Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis - a Comparative Analysis By CIBMTR

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147959 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 912-912

Author(s):

Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy ◽

Soyoung Kim ◽

Noel Estrada-Merly ◽

Ronald M. Sobecks ◽

Betul Oran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Transplantation ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Hematopoietic Cell ◽

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapeutic modality for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). However, the optimal conditioning regimen for allo-HCT either in the myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or in the reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) setting is not well known. Methods: Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified adults aged ≥18 years with MF who underwent allo-HCT between the years 2008-2018. Donor types included matched sibling donor (MSD), 8/8 matched unrelated donor (MUD), and 7/8 MUD. Outcomes were compared separately in the MAC and RIC cohorts based on the most common conditioning regimens used in each setting - MAC [(Fludarabine/Busulfan (Flu/Bu) vs. Busulfan/cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy)] or RIC [(Flu/Bu vs. Fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel)]. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) were evaluated. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier method and significant predictors were evaluated using Cox-proportional hazard regression method. Multivariable regression model included main effect (conditioning regimen) and covariates (patient age, gender, race, CMV match, disease subtype, DIPSS at HCT, comorbidities score (HCT-CI), Karnofsky performance status, prior therapy (ruxolitinib use/splenic radiation therapy/splenectomy), interval between diagnosis and transplant, conditioning intensity, stem cell source, donor-recipient HLA-match, GVHD prophylaxis, ATG/alemtuzumab use, transplant year, and center affect). All analyses were performed at a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Results: Of 872 patients who met the study criteria, 379 patients underwent allo-HCT using MAC (Flu/Bu=247, Bu/Cy=132) and 493 patients using RIC (Flu/Bu=166, Flu/Mel=327). Key baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. In multivariable analysis, significant differences in outcomes were observed in the MAC and RIC setting based on the choice of conditioning regimen (Table 2). In the MAC setting, Bu/Cy was associated with a higher risk of acute GVHD (grade 2-4 HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.67-3.25, p<0.01; grade 3-4 HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.52-3.52, p<0.01) and inferior GRFS (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.49-2.53, p<0.01) as compared to Flu/Bu. In the RIC setting, Flu/Mel was associated with inferior OS (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.15-2.81, p<0.01), higher risk of NRM (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.12-2.91, p=0.01) and acute GVHD (grade 2-4- HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.03, p=0.03; grade 3-4 HR 2.21, 95%CI 1.28-3.83, p<0.01) as compared to Flu/Bu. These higher risks associated with Flu/Mel were primarily observed early post-transplant. The results were consistent when the outcomes were evaluated based on the two common melphalan doses employed in the RIC setting (100mg/m 2 vs 140mg/m 2). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the choice of conditioning regimen significantly influences the outcomes of allo-HCT in MF. The results favor Flu/Bu based conditioning in the MAC (lesser acute GVHD and better GRFS) and RIC (better OS, lower NRM, lower acute GVHD) setting. Hence, this aspect should be explored in future studies as the modification of conditioning strategies could lead to improved outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Guru Murthy: TG therapeutics: Other: Advisory board; Cardinal Health Inc.: Honoraria; Qessential: Consultancy; Guidepoint: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy; Cancerexpertnow: Honoraria. Sobecks: CareDX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scott: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Saber: Govt. COI: Other.

Download Full-text

Influence of Stem Cell Source On GvH and NRM: Comparison of 10/10 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) with 9/10 HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor (MMUD) and Unrelated Cord Blood (UCB) Transplants.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3135.3135 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3135-3135

Author(s):

Clémence Granier ◽

Emeline Masson ◽

Lucie Biard ◽

Raphael Porcher ◽

Regis Peffault de la Tour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Hla Typing ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Stem Cell Source ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Cell Source

Abstract Abstract 3135 Background: When an HLA-matched donor is not available for allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT), the use of an alternative HLA-mismatched stem cell source may be considered. In Europe, HLA compatibility for HSCT is calculated for 10 alleles (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare outcomes after transplantation from 10/10 HLA-MUD, 9/10 HLA-MMUD and UCB performed at the Hospital Saint Louis (Paris, Fr). Methods: Patients receiving a first allogeneic transplantation from a 10/10, 9/10 UD or UCB from 2000 to 2011 were included. High resolution HLA typing was performed by PCR SSO and SSP for HLA loci: A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1. The following variables were studied as risk factors for transplant outcomes: disease, disease risk (standard/high risk), age at transplant, gender, donor/recipient sex-matching, ABO matching, donor/recipient CMV status, conditioning regimen, and use of anti-thymoglobulin (ATG). Results: 355 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies were analyzed. One hundred and ninety-six were transplanted with MUD, 84 with MMUD (mismatches for HLA-A: 16%, -B: 16%, -C: 39%, -DRB1: 8%, -DQB1: 21%) and 75 with UCB (52% with single and 48% with two UCB unit; 87% of all UCB transplants were 4–6/6 HLA-matched). Median patient age was 31 (range: 5–55). Patient characteristics differed between the 3 groups: (i) median age at transplant: 36 in MUD, 31 in MMUD, 22 in UCB (p<0.0001), (ii) high risk disease: 37%, 51%, 68% (p<0.0001), (iii) CMV negative donor/positive recipient: 31%, 36%, 60% (p<0.0001), (iv) use of ATG: 37%, 64%, 55% (p<0.0001). Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GvHD disease (aGvHD) were 61% (66% for MUD, 60% for MMUD and 48% for UCB) and 17% (17%, 24% and 15%), respectively. Three-year cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 46% (51% for MUD, 49% for MMUD and 29% for UCB). Three-year NRM was 34% (28% for MUD, 31% for MMUD and 51% for UCB). Graft failure occurred in 15% of UCB patient, 8% in MMUD group and 3% in MUD group (significant difference between UCB and MUD: OR=5.44, 95%CI 1.93–15.3, p=0.001). Multivariate analysis is summarized in table 1. It showed that MMUD tented to have a higher incidence of aGvHD III-IV than MUD and UCB. UCB had a lower incidence of cGvHD than MMUD. No significant effect of HSCT source on NRM was demonstrated. Conclusion: Compared to MMUD, UCB-HSCT induces less cGvHD and non significantly increased NRM. Compared to MUD, MMUD and UCB-HSCT did not result in a clear increase of NRM. UCB and 9/10 HLA-MMUD are both suitable stem cell sources for patients who cannot benefit from 10/10 HLA-MUD transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Transplant Outcomes with Fludarabine and Melphalan in High Risk AML Patients By Donor Types

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134474 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 20-21

Author(s):

Betul Oran ◽

Stefan O. Ciurea ◽

Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽

Amin M. Alousi ◽

Gabriela Rondon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Research Support ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Count Recovery

Background: Fludarabine and melphalan (FM) reduced intensity conditioning regimen has been widely used for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in AML patients not eligible for more ablative regimens. In this study, we looked into a contemporary group of high risk AML patients treated with FM and updated their outcome expectation by donor type. Methods: We included 292 AML patients who had first allo-SCT between January 2010 and December 2019 if their donors were haploidential (haplo, n=142) or matched related sibling (MSD, n=49) or matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=101) and their conditioning regimen was intravenous melphalan given as 100 mg/m2 or 140 mg/m2 in addition to fludarabine. Graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis was either tacrolimus and methotrexate (n=91) or tacrolimus with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) +/- Mycophenolate mofetil (n=201). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS) defined as time to relapse or death whichever happened first. Secondary outcomes was overall survival (OS). Results: The median age was younger in haplo transplants compared with MDS or MUDs (50 vs. 63)(Table 1). There were more patients in first or second complete remission with count recovery (CR1/2) in haplo group compared with MSD (29%) and MUD (37%) but that did not reach significance (p=0.22). High risk disease risk by European Leukemia Net (ELN), advance group, was also distributed similarly between donor groups (21% in MSD, 32% in MUD and 24% in haplo, p=0.5). Hematopoietic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) >2 was frequent in all donor groups (43% in MSD, 46% MUD and 36% haplo, p=0.4). Hematopoietic stem cell source and GvHD prophylaxis differed by donor as expected; all haplo patients but 15 had bone marrow (BM, 89%) while 2% of MSD and 26% of MUD had BM. GvHD prophylaxis was PTCy in all haplo patients but half of the MUD patients (49%) and some of the MSD also received PTCy (20%). The median follow-up of 143 survivors was 24 months (range, 1 to 102 months). RFS at 2 years was 41.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35.5%- 47.6%) and OS was 48.6% (95% CI=42.1%-54.7%). Outcome estimates by donor types are presented in table 2. Considering the haplo patients were younger, we also analyzed RFS for older patients aged >50 and >60 separately (Figure). Causes of death was mostly relapse in all donor types; 54.2% in MSD, 40.4% in MUD and 44.7% in haplo. Cox regression model for RFS revealed that CR1/2 or CR without count recovery (CRi/p) were favorable prognostic variables compared with advanced disease (hazard ratio (HR)=0.35, 95%CI=0.25-0.51, p<0.001 and HR=0.65, 95%CI=0.44-0.96, p=0.03) but ELN adverse risk (HR=1.91, 95%CI=1.37-2.65, p<0.001) and HCT-CI>2 (HR=1.62, 95%CI=1.17-2.23, p=0.003) were poor prognostic markers. Age >50 was not a prognostic factor for RFS. Conclusion: FM remains to be an effective conditioning regimen that is leading to similar RFS after transplant with different donor types. Despite smaller sample size, even older haploidentical patients had RFS that was not significantly different compared with older MSD and MUD patients. However, relapse remains to be the major reason of failure in patients with high risk features including disease status not in CR with count recovery at allo-SCT and/or adverse ELN risk. Innovative strategies either with more ablative regimens or post-transplant maintenance or integration of cellular therapy options are needed to improve outcomes for those AML patients. Disclosures Oran: Celgene: Consultancy; ASTEX: Research Funding; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ciurea:Kiadis Pharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding. Mehta:Incyte: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Alousi:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Therakos: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kebriaei:Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Jazz: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board. Champlin:Actinium: Consultancy; Cytonus: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Maintenance Treatment with Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in High Risk MDS and AML Patients after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134272 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 29-30

Author(s):

Betul Oran ◽

Gheath Alatrash ◽

Amin M. Alousi ◽

Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽

Chitra Hosing ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Bone Marrow Suppression ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Disease Relapse ◽

Interim Analyses ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Count Recovery

Background: Disease relapse remains to be the one of the major reasons of treatment failures after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in AML and MDS patients (pts). SGI-110 is a next generation hypomethylating agent that molecularly is a dinucleotide derivative of decitabine and therefore a more potent inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase activity. We present interim results of a single arm phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of SGI-110 in AML/MDS pts. to improve transplant outcomes. Methods: In this study, there are 3 treatment cohorts defined by disease status after transplant with different primary outcomes of interest. Cohort 1 includes AML/MDS pts. with morphological relapse after transplant; cohort 2 pts with minimal residual (MRD) and cohort 3 pts with no evidence of disease. As of June 2020, 54 pts have enrolled. Herein, we report the interim analyses of 22 pts treated in cohort 3 and received SGI-110 as post-transplant maintenance while in remission. Other cohorts' results will be reported separately. The maintenance cohort includes high risk AML/MDS pts aged 18-75. High risk MDS is defined as having (1) poor or very poor cytogenetics by revised-IPSS or (2) monosomal karyotype or (3) bone marrow blast count > 5% before transplant; high risk AML as (1) adverse risk group by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) or (2) presence of MRD or active disease at transplant. Therapy-related AML/MDS is included. Pts. are excluded in the presence of (1) active acute graft versus host disease (GvHD), (2) uncontrolled systemic infection, or (3) concurrent use of systemic immune suppressive other than calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus. The study intervention includes SGI-110 given as 30 mg/m2/day subcutaneously for 5 consecutive days every 28 days until completion of 12 cycles, disease relapse, or experience of unacceptable toxicity. SGI-110 is initiated between 42 to 100 days following allo-SCT if there is adequate engraftment with absolute neutrophil count >/= 1.0 x 109 /L; platelet >/= 50 x 109 /L and no documented evidence of relapse. Treatment delays up to 70 days and dose reductions are allowed per protocol. The primary endpoint for this cohort is relapse-free survival (RFS) time defined as either time to disease progression or death whichever happened first. The maximum planned sample size is 40. Results: As of June 2020, 22 pts were enrolled; M/F, 12/10, median age, 62 (range 18 to74). Of 11 AML pts., ELN risk category was adverse in 8, intermediate in 2 and favorable in 1. Of 11 MDS pts, 6 had poor/very poor and 4 good and 1 intermediate risk cytogenetic abnormalities by revised-IPSS. Of 22, 6 were in complete remission with count recovery at transplant. Median time to initiation of first cycle of maintenance with SGI-110 was 59.5 days (range, 43 to 114 days). So far, 14 pts of 22 were taken off the study; 6 due to disease relapse, 4 completed planned 12 cycles of treatment, 1 lost insurance, 1 withdrew the consent, 1 had travel issues due to COVID19 pandemic and 1 had pulmonary complications unrelated to study drug. Currently, 8 remain to be on the study. Median number of treatment cycles administered have been 4 (range, 1 to 12). Of 22, 7 pts. required the SGI-110 dose to be reduced down to 20 mg/m2/dayX5 days and 1 patient to 20 mg/m2/dayX3 days to be able to continue the treatment. At a median follow-up of 13.1 months for survivors (n=17), RFS and overall survival at 1-year was 66.3% (95% confidence interval (CI)=42% to 82.3%) and 88.9% (95%CI=61.8 to 92.2%) respectively (Figure) During the study, 353 AEs observed with 125 cycles of SGI-110 treatments. Of 353, 287 (81.3%) were attributable to SGI-110 and 133 of 287 (46.3%) were grade 3 or higher in severity. Most of the grade 3 or higher AEs were related with bone marrow suppression; 71 (25%) thrombocytopenia, 64 (22%) neutropenia, 67 (23%) leukopenia and 8 (2%) anemia. Of 22 pts, 15 had grade 4 neutropenia at least once and 8 pts grade 4 thrombocytopenia. There was 18 episodes of infectious AEs and 11 of 18 were grade 3-4. There were no grade 5 AEs observed attributable to study drug. Conclusion: SGI-110 led to frequent grade 3-4 BM suppression in high risk AML/MDS pts when given as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT. However, bone marrow suppression was not associated with increased risk of infection and it was temporary with count recovery. The efficacy of SGI-110 has been promising with 1-year RFS of 66.3%. The study currently is ongoing. Disclosures Oran: Celgene: Consultancy; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; ASTEX: Research Funding. Alousi:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Therakos: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria. Mehta:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Keer:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Champlin:Actinium: Consultancy; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Omeros: Consultancy; Cytonus: Consultancy; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: The abstract presents interim analyses of a clinical trial investigating efficacy and safety of SGI-110 used as maintenance therapy in high risk AML and MDS patients after transplant.

Download Full-text