CD34+CD38-CD58- leukemia-Propagating Cells at Diagnosis Could Identify Patients at High-Risk for Relapse in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3795-3795
Author(s):  
Yuan Kong ◽  
Lan-Ping Xu ◽  
Yan-Rong Liu ◽  
Ya-Zhen Qin ◽  
Yu-Qian Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Relapse of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) may result from the persistence of leukemia stem cells sometimes termed leukemia-propagating cells (LPCs). We recently found that Ph+ALL LPCs are enriched in the CD34+CD38-CD58- fraction using anti-CD122-conditioned NOD/SCID xenograft assay by intra-bone marrow injection, which translating to adverse clinical outcomes (Kong Y, et al. Leukemia 2014. accepted). Despite the widespread use of abelson tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Ph+ALL, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the best curative option. However, whether the prognostic significance of the identified LPCs phenotype to identify patients at high risk for relapse could retain in Ph+ALL after allo-HSCT, if any, is unknown. Aims: To investigate the prognostic significance of the candidate CD34+CD38-CD58- LPCs in Ph+ALL subjects underwent allo-HSCT. Methods: A total of 80 consecutive adults (18-60 years) with Ph+ALL underwent allo-HSCT were eligible for the study at Peking University Institute of Hematology from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013. Imatinib was routinely administered in subjects pre- and post-HSCT as previously reported. A multi-parameter flow cytometry analysis of CD58-FITC/CD10-PE/CD19-APC-Cy7/CD34-PerCP/CD45-Vioblue/ CD38-APC on gated leukemia blasts of bone marrow was performed at diagnosis. Furthermore, minimal residual disease (MRD) was monitored by BCR/ABL transcripts in bone marrow samples at diagnosis, directly before transplantation, as well as serially at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12,24,36,60 months post-HSCT and at relapse using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Cumulative incidences of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality were calculated using the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Factors at a level of P<0.1 were included as variables in the multivariate Cox regression model. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital. Results: On the basis of blasts phenotypes at diagnosis, subjects were stratified into CD34+CD38-CD58- group (N=15) and other phenotype group (N=65). The demographic and clinical characteristics showed no significant difference between the two phenotype groups. Median follow-up was 25.5 mo (range, 6-65 mo) for all subjects and 33 mo (range, 6-65 mo) for survivors. During the MRD monitoring, significantly higher levels of BCR/ABL transcripts were detected in subjects in CD34+CD38-CD58- group than persons in other phenotype group especially at 3 mo post-HSCT [0.12(0-152.4)% vs. 0(0-100)%, P=0.001]. Additionally, CD34+CD38-CD58- LPCs phenotype directly correlated with higher 3-year CIR (63.2% [58.2-68.1%] vs. 5.3% [5.1-5.5%]; P<0.0001), worse LFS (30.2% [8.1-56.6%] vs. 78.7% [64.5-87.7%]; P=0.001) and OS (37.7% [12.6-63.2%] vs. 82.3% [68.5-90.4%]; P=0.0004). Multivariate analyses indicated that CD34+CD38-CD58- LPCs phenotype at diagnosis and BCR-ABL reduction at 3 mo post-HSCT were independent risk factors for relapse, LFS and OS in adults with Ph+ALL underwent allo-HSCT. Summary/Conclusion: Our data suggest that a candidate CD34+CD38-CD58- LPCs phenotype at diagnosis allows rapid identification of high-risk patients for relapse even after allo-HSCT. Risk-stratification post-HSCT therapy incorporating analysis of CD34+CD38-CD58- LPCs phenotype at diagnosis promises to benefit the adults with Ph+ALL in the future. Acknowledgment: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81370638&81230013), the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Program (grant no. Z141100000214011), and Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Funds (grant no. RDB2012-23). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e2014047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Helbig ◽  
Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis ◽  
Malgorzata Kopera ◽  
Krystyna Jagoda ◽  
Patrycja Rzepka ◽  
...  

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Material and methods. Overall, 128 high-risk ALL patients at a median age of 26 years (range 18-56 years) at diagnosis received AHSCT between 1991-2008. Induction treatment was anthracycline-based in all patients. Conditioning regimen consisted of CAV (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, etoposide) in 125 patients whereas 3 subjects received cyclophosphamide and TBI (total body irridation). Bone marrow was stored for 72 hours in 4oC and re-infused 24 hours after conditioning completion. Bone marrow was a source of stem cells in 119 patients, peripheral blood in 2 and 7 subjects received both bone marrow and peripheral blood. Results. With a median follow-up after AHSCT of 1.6 years (range 0.1-22.3 years), the probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) for the whole group at 10 years was 27% and 23% at 20 years. Transplant-related mortality at 100 days after AHSCT was 3.2%.. There was a strong tendency for better LFS for MRD-negative patients if compared with patients who had positive or unknown MRD status at AHSCT (32% vs 23% and 25%, respectively; p=0.06). There was no difference in LFS between B- and T-lineage ALL as well as between patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) and CR2. LFS at 10 years for patients with detectable BCR-ABL at transplant was 20% and this was comparable with subjects with negative and missing BCR-ABL status (26% and 28%; p=0.97). Conclusions. The results of AHSCT for high-risk ALL remains unsatisfactory with low probability of long-term LFS.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2816-2825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Kiehl ◽  
Ludwig Kraut ◽  
Rainer Schwerdtfeger ◽  
Bernd Hertenstein ◽  
Mats Remberger ◽  
...  

Purpose The role of unrelated allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients is still not clear, and only limited data are available from the literature. We analyzed factors affecting clinical outcome of ALL patients receiving a related or unrelated stem-cell graft from matched donors. Patients and Methods The total study population was 264 adult patients receiving a myeloablative allogeneic stem-cell transplant for ALL at nine bone marrow transplantation centers between 1990 and 2002. Of these, 221 patients receiving a matched related or unrelated graft were analyzed. One hundred forty-eight patients received transplantation in complete remission; 62 patients were in relapse; and 11 patients were refractory to chemotherapy before transplant. Fifty percent of patients received bone marrow, and 50% received peripheral blood stem cell from a human leukocyte antigen–identical related (n = 103), or matched unrelated (n = 118) donor. Results Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 28%, with 76 patients (34%) still alive (2.2 to 103 months post-transplantation), and 145 deceased (65 relapses, transplant-related mortality, 45%). We observed an advantage regarding DFS in favor of patients receiving transplantation during their first complete remission (CR) in comparison with patients receiving transplantation in or after second CR (P = .014) or who relapsed (P < .001). We observed a clear trend toward improved survival in favor of B-lineage ALL patients compared with T-lineage ALL patients (P = .052), and Philadelphia chromosome–positive patients had no poorer outcome than Philadelphia chromosome–negative patients. Total-body irradiation–based conditioning improved DFS in comparison with busulfan (P = .041). Conclusion Myeloablative matched related or matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in ALL patients should be performed in first CR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document