Phase I/II Trial of Weekly Escalated Dose Bortezomib Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients in First Relapse or Primary Refractory Disease after First Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Background Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide monotherapy, as well as in combination with dexamethasone and chemotherapy, have shown high overall response rates (ORR) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Recently, the combination of Bortezomib (1.0 mg/m2), Lenalidomide (15 mg) and Dexamethasone was reported to show efficacy in RRMM. (Richardson, Blood 2014) Here, we report the long-time follow-up results of a multicenter, dose-escalating phase I-II trial, HOVON86, which evaluated the effect of weekly escalated dose Bortezomib combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone as reinduction treatment followed by Lenalidomide monotherapy for maintenance treatment in patients with RRMM after first line therapy. (Trial EudraCTnr 2007-002533-37) Methods In the dose escalation part of the study, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose level (RDL) of weekly Bortezomib and Lenalidomide with Dexamethasone were determined according to a 3 + 3' dose-escalation scheme. A maximum of 4 dose levels were planned. Bortezomib was administered once weekly by rapid intravenous administration on days 1, 8, and 15, at a starting dose of 1.3 mg/m2 and planned to be escalated to 1.6 mg/m2, Lenalidomide was administered days 1-21 followed by a one-week interval at a starting dose of 10 mg/day and planned to be increased to 15 mg at dose level 3 and 4. Low dose Dexamethasone was added at a fixed dose of 20 mg days 1,2,8,9,15, and 16. Cycles were repeated at 28 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. The MTD was defined as the level with 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) minus 1 level. A phase II part of the study was performed at the MTD level. All patients received Lenalidomide maintenance at a dose of 10 mg/day, days 1-21 in 28 day cycles until relapse or progression. Patients received valaciclovir prophylaxis with Bortezomib and prophylactic salicylic acid throughout treatment. Results 81 patients with a first RRMM were enrolled, 4 patients were non-eligible based on not having measurable disease. The median age of all 77 evaluable patients at enrollment was 66 years (range, 46–84), 64% male, and 26%/5% of patients had ISS II/III disease. In the Phase 1 part, 15 patients received Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone according to dose level 1: 1.3 mg/m2/10mg/20mg (n=3), dose level 2: 1.6 mg/m2/10mg/20mg (n=6) or dose level 3: 1.6 mg/m2/15mg/20mg (n=6). The DLT was reached at the 3rd dose level, due to two grade 3 non-hematological DLT's. There were no DLT's in dose level 1 or 2. Therefore, the RDL for the phase 2 part was established at Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2, Lenalidomide 10 mg, Dexamethasone 20 mg. In the Phase 2 part of the study, the ORR after induction in 70 patients at the RDL of Phase I (n=6) and in Phase II (n=64), was 89%, with 64% CR +VGPR, table 1. The median number of cycles to achieve ≥PR was 1, while the median number of cycles to maximum response was 2. The median duration of response was 28 months. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 19 and 42 months, respectively, Figure 1. The median time to progression was 27 months; the median time to next treatment was 19 months. Prognostic factors associated with PFS included complex karyotype, defined as showing 3 or more abnormalities; no prognostic factors were identified in association with OS. Hematologic toxicity NCI-CTC grade 1-4 occurred in 33/70 (47%) of patients, including 30% grade 3-4. Infectious complications concerned grade 2 in 29% and grade 3 in 16% of patients. Thrombo-embolic events (VTE) occurred in 2 patients (3%). 41/70 (59%) patients developed polyneuropathy (PN) grade ≥ 1; of these 41 patients, 18 patients experienced sensory PN, 2 patients had motor PN, and in 21 cases the type of PN was not further specified. 29 (41%) patients had grade 1-2, and the remaining 12 (17%) patients had grade 3-4 PN. 12/29 (41%) patients received a dose reduction upon development of PN grade 1-2, 11/12 (92%) patients upon development of grade 3-4 PN. 19/29 (66%) patients with grade 1-2 PN showed a complete recovery as compared to 6/12 (50%) patients with grade 3-4 PN. Conclusion Weekly Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 plus Lenalidomide 10 mg/day, combined with low-dose Dexamethason is a feasible, effective treatment for relapsed, refractory patients with manageable toxicity. Table 1 Phase 1: n(%) Phase 2: n(%) Total: n(%) Total 6 64 70 CR+VGPR No 3(50%) 2(34%) 25(36%) Yes 3(50%) 42(66%) 45(64%) ORR: ≥PR No 1(17%) 7(11%) 8(11%) Yes 5(83%) 57(89%) 62(89%) Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Kersten: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vellenga:Janssen: Research Funding. Bos:celgene: Research Funding. Lokhorst:Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Results of Anti-PD-Ligand 1 (Durvalumab) & Lenalidomide in Patients with Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma and Correlation with Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Gene Expression Profile

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126358 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4024-4024

Author(s):

Christiane Querfeld ◽

Xiwei Wu ◽

Tracy Stiller ◽

Joycelynne Palmer ◽

James F Sanchez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

T Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Gene Expression Profile ◽

Dose Level ◽

Expression Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees

Background: T cells in CTCL are functionally exhausted and are characterized by the expression of immune inhibitory molecules such as PD1 and PD-L1 (Cancer Immunol Res 6; 2018). These findings justify the evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibition to reverse T cell exhaustion in CTCL. We initiated a phase 1/2 clinical trial of lenalidomide and durvalumab to determine the safety and efficacy of this regimen. Durvalumab is a human monoclonal antibody with high affinity and selectivity for PD-L1, targeting exhausted T cells and distinct cells within their environment. Lenalidomide, an oral immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and analog of thalidomide, has previously shown activity in CTCL (Blood 123; 2014). Durvalumab may restore an anti-tumor immune response, and the combination of durvalumab and lenalidomide may enhance immune checkpoint blockade-induced immune responses. Associations between immune checkpoints, gene expression profile and the clinical efficacy of durvalumab/lenalidomide combination were evaluated. The primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide in combination with durvalumab and safety with primary endpoint of toxicity (using CTCAE 4.03). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and median duration. Relationships between gene expression profile (GEP), PD-L1 expression, and antitumor activity were exploratory end points. Methods: A Phase 1 portion (NCT03011814) is ongoing to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the durvalumab and lenalidomide combination. Pts are enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive durvalumab (fixed dose at 1500 mg) and dose escalation of lenalidomide (dose level 1 = 10 mg for all cycles; dose level 2 = 10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for all subsequent cycles; dose level 3 =10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for cycle 2, and 20 mg for all subsequent cycles) to characterize safety, efficacy and antitumor activity. Serial skin samples were collected to assess the impact on the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor activity. Results: Ten pts. were evaluable for toxicities. Nine patients were evaluable for response with three patients at each dose level. 8 males/2 females, age 29-59 y, with refractory/advanced CTCL, clinical stages IB (1), IIA (3), IIB (4), IIIA (1), and aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ CTCL (1) and a median of prior systemic treatments of 3 (range, 2-4) have been enrolled. Median follow up time was 12 (range, 3-24+) months. No serious AEs or DLTs were observed during the DLT evaluation period (cycles 1-3). The most frequently reported AEs were fatigue (n=7), skin pain (n=4), chills (n=3), anemia (n=3), and leukopenia (4). One grade 3 maculopapular rash (possibly due to lenalidomide) was observed, all other treatment-related AEs were grade 1/2 in severity. Median cycles of treatment were 7 (range, 3-20+) months. Median duration of response was 4 (range, 1- 21+) months. Six pts achieved PR, while 3 pts maintained stable disease. Three pts remain on treatment. Expression panels of several checkpoints (PD1, PD-L1 & ICOS) (Cycle1 Day1 vs Cycle 2 Day15) were analyzed. Detectable levels of PD-L1 but low levels of ICOS are observed in responding pts vs. high PD-L1 and ICOS levels in non-responders. GEP highlights downregulation of TNF-alpha signaling via NFkB, IFN-gamma, and PI3-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways among other pathways. Conclusions: Durvalumab/lenalidomide has significant clinical activity in refractory/advanced CTCL, which will be formally evaluated in the Phase 2 portion. Responses were durable and ongoing, and treatment was well tolerated. Dose escalation is up to lenalidomide 20 mg daily. Our preliminary results from pts on trial demonstrated that immune signatures on skin biopsies at baseline may be predictive of response to checkpoint blockade and yield insights into mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. Disclosures Querfeld: Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Soligenix: Other: Investigator; Celgene: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; City of Hope Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute: Employment; Medivir: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; miRagen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Eisai: Other: Investigator; Elorac: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Helsinn: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator. Palmer:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Combination Treatment of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib and Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Initial Results from a Multicenter Phase 1/2b Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.377.377 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 377-377 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ajai Chari ◽

Saurabh Chhabra ◽

Saad Usmani ◽

Sarah Larson ◽

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Recent advances have improved outcomes for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM); however, novel agents targeting different pathways are still needed. Ibrutinib (ibr) is a first-in-class, once-daily, oral, covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), an enzyme overexpressed in malignant plasma cells, whose expression may positively regulate the myeloma stem cell-like population (Yang 2015). Clinical activity was observed at the 840-mg dose of ibr in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), when combined with weekly dexamethasone (dex) (Vij 2014). Furthermore, BTK-mediated upregulation of NF-κB p65 contributes to proteasome inhibitor (PI) resistance in MM cell lines; thus, BTK inhibition with ibr may help overcome PI resistance (Murray 2015). In vitro, ibr has demonstrated synergy with PIs in MM (Rushworth 2013) and mantle cell lymphoma cells (Ou 2013). PCYC-1119 (NCT01962792) is an ongoing phase 1/2b study of ibr + carfilzomib (CFZ) ± dex in RRMM. Methods: Eligible pts received ≥2 prior therapies, including bortezomib (BTZ) and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and had either no response or documented disease progression following the most recent treatment. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design, followed by expansion of 2 cohorts (Table). Phase 1 primary objectives were maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) determination and safety. Results: As of July 8, 2015, 40 pts were enrolled and received ibr combined with CFZ ± dex across multiple dose levels during the phase 1 portion. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and cohorts 2b and 3b were chosen for expansion to further evaluate safety and efficacy. Pts had a median age of 63 y (range, 44-83) and a median time from diagnosis of 4.3 y (range, 0.5-25.3). Cytogenetic assessment by FISH identified that 20% and 8% of pts had t4;14 and del17p, respectively. Overall, pts received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 2-11), including 10% prior CFZ, 25% pomalidomide, 25% thalidomide, 73% autologous stem cell transplant, and 100% BTZ and lenalidomide. Moreover, 88% of pts were refractory to their last therapy, with 73% refractory to BTZ, 73% refractory to lenalidomide, and 58% refractory both to IMiD and PI. No relevant differences were observed across cohorts. Thirty-six pts were evaluable for efficacy. With early follow-up, the initial objective response rate (ORR) was 58% and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 67%. In cohort 3b, the ORR and CBR were 65% and 77%, respectively, including 3 very good partial responses (VGPRs) and 1 stringent complete response (sCR). No clinically meaningful tolerability differences were seen between cohorts, and no new safety findings were observed. Across all cohorts, the most common all-grade nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (43%), cough (35%), constipation and fatigue (30% each), and nausea (28%). Grade ≥3 hematologic AEs included thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (13%), and neutropenia (5%). Grade ≥3 nonhematologic AEs occurring in ≥10% of pts were pneumonia and hypertension (15% each), diarrhea (13%), and fatigue (10%). Eleven pts reported treatment related SAEs. No clinically relevant differences in AEs were observed across cohorts. Ten pts discontinued study treatment due to progressive disease; an additional 6 pts discontinued due to an AE, and 6 pts discontinued due to investigator or pt decision. Duration of treatment ranged from 0.3 to 13.6 months, and 17 pts remain on treatment. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: The initial phase 1 data indicated promising clinical potential for ibr + CFZ + dex, as it is well tolerated with no DLTs, no new toxicities, and no increase in the severity of known toxicities for the individual agents. The preliminary ORR of 58%, with 1 sCR and 3 VGPRs in cohort 3b, is encouraging in this mostly refractory patient population, especially with the high number refractory to BTZ. Cohort 3b was established as the RP2D and will be further evaluated in the phase 2 portion of the study. Table. Dosing Cohorts Cohort ibr* mg/qd CFZ† mg/m2 dex‡ mg 1(n=3) 560 20/27 - 2a(n=5) 560 20/36 - 2b(n=14) 560 20/36 20 3b(n=18) 840 20/36 20 *Starts on Day (D) 8 of Cycle (C) 1; continuous thereafter. †D1-2, 8-9, 15-16 through C12; thereafter D1-2, 15-16. ‡D1-2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23; 10 mg for pts age ≥75 y; 4 mg prior to CFZ during C1 only (cohorts 1 and 2a) with re-initiation as needed. Disclosures Chari: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ibrutinib in relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Usmani:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Larson:BMS: Consultancy. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Matous:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Holkova:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lunning:TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Valent:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Kwei:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chang:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Graef:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Bilotti:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. McDonagh:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Multicenter Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) or Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2737.2737 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2737-2737 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Naokuni Uike ◽

Michinora Ogura ◽

Yoshitaka Imaizumi ◽

Norio Asou ◽

Atae Utsunomiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2737 Introduction: ATL is prevalent in Japan and has the worst prognosis among T-cell malignancies. PTCL also has a poor prognosis with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens, and both would benefit from better treatment modality. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity, and is approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone after at least 1 prior therapy and for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with 5q deletion. We conducted a phase 1 study of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed ATL or PTCL to establish the recommended dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed advanced ATL or PTCL. Dose-escalation was conducted according to the standard 3+3 design. Up to one PTCL patient was allowed to be included in each cohort of 3 patients. Patients in Cohort 1 received oral lenalidomide 25 mg daily on Days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received 25 and 35 mg/day, respectively, on each day of the 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia lasting 5 or more days; thrombocytopenia (platelets <10,000/uL or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion); ALT/AST elevation of Grade 4 or that of Grade 3 lasting 7 or more days; and/or clinically unacceptable Grade 3 or higher other non-hematological adverse events (AEs). Treatment was continued until the development of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease (PD). Response was assessed by internationally accepted standard criteria for ATL and PTCL. Results: From July 2010–June 2012, 13 Japanese patients (9 ATL and 4 PTCL; age 32–74 years [median, 64]; 1–11 prior therapies [median, 1]) were enrolled: 3 in Cohort 1, 6 in Cohort 2, and 4 in Cohort 3. The 3 patients in Cohort 1 received lenalidomide for 21, 103, and 637 days, respectively, until PD with no instances of DLT. In Cohort 2, 1 patient experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL) and 4 patients received lenalidomide for 37, 56, 138, and 387 days, respectively, until PD in 3 patients and unrelated death in one. The sixth patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 28+ days without a DLT. In Cohort 3, 2 patients had DLTs (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL in one patient and Grade 3 prolongation of QTc interval in one patient on concomitant fluconazole with preexisting cardiac disease and grade 1 QTc prolongation at baseline), 1 patient received lenalidomide for 71 days before withdrawal of consent, and 1 patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 323+ days without a DLT. Based on these results, 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle was regarded as the MTD. Other Grade 3/4 non-DLT AEs occurring in 2 or more patients included neutropenia (n=8), lymphocytopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=3), skin rash (n=3), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and increased ALT/AST (n=2). Among the 9 ATL patients, 3 achieved partial responses (PR) with hematological complete response in 2 patients, including the disappearance of skin lesions in 1 patient. These responses occurred between 54 and 57 days, and lasted for 92, 279+ and 505 days. Among the 4 PTCL patients, 1 achieved a PR at day 106 with >75% reduction in lymph nodes, which lasted for 282 days. PK profiles of patients in the study were generally consistent with that observed in Japanese MM patients. Plasma exposure of lenalidomide increased with increasing dose with a mean Cmax on Day 1 for 25 mg and 35 mg of 493 ng/mL and 628 ng/mL, respectively, and a mean AUC24 of 2774 ng/mL and 3062 ng/mL, respectively. There was no evidence of accumulation following multiple dosing for 8 days. Conclusions: This phase 1 study identified lenalidomide 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle as the dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study in patients with ATL or PTCL. Based on the preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in ATL and PTCL patients, a phase 2 study in patients with relapsed ATL in Japan is planned. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide (CC-5013) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult ATL patients. Tobinai:Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomedics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Chugai/Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of a Novel Conditioning Regimen Utilizing Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) with Fludarabine-Melphalan for Patients with Relapsed Hematologic Malignancies Undergoing Second Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-SCT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138554 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Hongtao Liu ◽

Bulent Aydogan ◽

Yasmin Hasan ◽

Amy Wang ◽

Kamil Yenice ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Normal Tissues ◽

Total Marrow Irradiation ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Relapse Rates

Background: Treatment options for relapse after allo-SCT remain limited with poor outcomes. Second Allo-SCT provides benefit to a small subset of patients (pts). However, relapse rates after second Allo-SCT are high and novel approaches to improve outcomes after second Allo-SCT are needed. Conventional total body irradiation (TBI) can reduce relapse rates, but greater radiation doses cannot be delivered safely without increasing the toxicity to surrounding normal tissues and organs. Total marrow irradiation (TMI) techniques permit dose escalation while substantially reducing doses delivered to normal tissues relative to conventional TBI. We conducted a phase I study to assess the feasibility of combining TMI with a fludarabine-melphalan conditioning regimen for second or beyond Allo-SCT to decrease relapse. Methods: Inclusion criteria required a matched/mismatched donor and relapse after previous allo-SCT. GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, plus ATG for mismatched donors (NCT02333162). From December 2015 to May 2020, twenty-two pts with were consented to this 3 + 3 phase I trial design; one pt failed to proceed and was replaced. 21 pts (18 AML, 2 MDS/MPN, one ALL) were treated with linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique using 6 MV photons. TMI was provided twice daily at 1.5 Gy per fraction starting with a total dose of 6 Gy, with dose escalation to 9 Gy and 12 Gy. Mucositis was an adverse event of special interest and assessed by the WHO Mucositis Score on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-transplant to investigate the combined mucosal injury from alkylating chemotherapy and radiation. Results: Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 56 years. All had matched donors except for one mismatched unrelated donor. 6 pts were in CR2, 4 pts in CR3, and 11 pts had refractory disease prior to 2nd SCT. 3 pts treated on dose level 6 Gy had no DLTs. At dose level 2 (9 Gy), the first pt of the cohort of six pts had grade 3 mucositis as a DLT on day 7; it resolved by day 21. The first 2 pts at dose level 3 (12 Gy) had no DLT, but the 3rd pt had DLT of grade 3 mucositis on day 7, resolving by day 14. Two more pts were treated and none had DLT. A sixth pt with refractory disease was treated but had graft failure with concurrent bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. This pt also developed grade 3 mucositis on day 14 that progressed to grade 4 on day 21 but resolved by day 28. Thus, we determined the MTD for TMI was 12 Gy; 9 Gy was an alternative dose for less fit or older pts. SCT outcomes were listed in Table 1. As mentioned above, 1 pt had primary graft failure, and one pt failed to have platelet engraftment due to early relapse. 11 pts developed aGVHD with cumulative aGVHD at 58%, and 4 pts developed cGVHD with cumulative cGVHD at 33%. With median follow up of 11 months (1 - 30 months), 6 pts had disease relapse after a median of 205 days (46-464 days); 10 pts have died (5 from PD; 2 from infection, 1 from GVHD, 1 from PTLD, 1 from second malignancy). Two year PFS and OS were 48% and 50% respectively, which compare favorably to the 2 years PFS and OS of 17.5% and 22.6% from our historical data with 65 pts who had 2nd Allo-SCT prior to this TMI trial at our center (Fan et al. Exp Hematol Oncol 2019). Conclusion: We recommend 12 Gy of VMAT-TMI as the MTD combined with fludarabine-melphalan (140mg/m2) as a conditioning regimen for second allo-SCT. Grade 3-4 mucositis was transient, peaking at days 7-14, and resolving by day 21-28. 9 Gy may be appropriate for less fit or older pts. The 2 year PFS and OS of 48% and 50% after second Allo-SCT for this novel TMI-based regimen are sufficiently encouraging to warrant further study. Table 1 Disclosures Liu: Agios: Honoraria, Other: Regional Advisory board meeting; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Stock:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Research to Practice: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; American Society of Hematology: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Larson:Novartis, Takeda, CVS/Caremark, Celgene, Amgen, Epizyme: Consultancy; Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Cellectis, Forty Seven: Research Funding. Kline:Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding. Riedell:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; Morphosys: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria. Bishop:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CRSPPR Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Weekly Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (wCCd) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Phase I- II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.175.175 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 175-175 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Davide Rossi ◽

Sara Bringhen ◽

Alessandra Larocca ◽

Fabiana Gentilini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Carfilzomib is a novel second generation proteasome-inhibitor with significant anti MM activity and favorable toxicity profile, including very limited neurotoxicity and neutropenia. This Phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once weekly carfilzomib combined with cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (wCCd) and to assess safety and efficacy of this combination in elderly patients with newly diagnosed MM. Here we report the first findings from the Phase I dose-escalation and expansion portions. Enrolment in the phase II portion is ongoing. Methods In the Phase I, the standard 3+3 dose-escalation scheme was adopted, with Carfilzomib as the only escalating agent starting at 45 mg/m2 (level 0), maximal planned dose 70 mg/m2 (level 2), and 36 mg/m2, if needed (level -1), given IV on days 1, 8, 15 in 28-day cycles. Oral cyclophosphamide was administered at 300 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and oral dexamethasone at 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22 for all dose levels. Dose escalation of Carfilzomib was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. After completion of 9 cycles, patients receive 28-day maintenance cycles with Carfilzomib (days 1, 8, 15) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) defined by the Phase I study until disease progression or intolerance. The objectives were to determine the MTD and assess activity and safety. Results As of June 15, 2014, 28 newly diagnosed MM patients were enrolled. Median age was 74 years, 29% of patients were older than 75 years, 36% had ISS stage III, 24% had unfavorable FISH profile [t(4;14) or t (14;16) or del17p]. Twelve patients were enrolled in the Phase I portion of the study. At dose level 0 (Carfilzomib 45 mg/m2) no DLT was reported; at dose level 1 (Carfilzomib 56 mg/m2), 1 of 6 patients experienced DLT, consisting of grade 3 creatinine increase; at dose level 2 (Carfilzomib 70 mg/m2) no DLT occurred. The MTD of weekly Carfilzomib was thus established as 70 mg/m2. Toxicity and response data are available for 25 patients, who have completed at least the first cycle; 3 patients are currently receiving their first cycle of treatment. Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events occurred in less than 15% of patients and included neutropenia (12%, 3 patients), anemia (12%, 3 patients), acute pulmonary edema (8%, 2 patients), pulmonary embolism (4%, 1 patient), creatinine increase (4%, 1 patient), nausea (4%, 1 patient), and fatigue (4%, 1 patient). No peripheral neuropathy was observed. Overall, the wCCd regimen was well tolerated, 3 patients (12%) required Carfilzomib dose reduction (grade 3 creatinine increase, grade 3 transaminase increase and grade 2 fever) and 3 patients (12%) required drug discontinuation due to adverse events (2 acute pulmonary edemas and 1 creatinine increase). Patients received a median of 5 cycles (range 1-9). After 4 induction cycles, 83% of patients achieved at least partial response, 39% at least very good partial response, and 22% complete response. Responses improved over time, as shown in table 1. During the study, only 2 patients progressed and 1 patient died, due to acute pulmonary edema considered probably related to treatment. Conclusions This is the first prospective study evaluating once weekly carfilzomib in treatment-naïve MM. wCCd therapy appears safe and effective in newly diagnosed MM patients. Responses became deeper with subsequent cycles and toxicities were manageable. The response rate observed with weekly carfilzomib compares favorably with similar studies with standard twice weekly carfilzomib infusion. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Table 1 2nd cycle 4th cycle 6th cycle Complete Response 5% 22% 27% At least Very Good Partial Response 9% 39% 63% At least Partial Response 73% 83% 91% Disclosures Palumbo: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use off-label of Carfilzomib (proteasome inhibitor).. Bringhen:Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen and Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy. Larocca:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cavallo:Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gaidano:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Final Results of a Phase 1/2 Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of Evofosfamide, a Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug, and Dexamethasone with or without Bortezomib in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2122.2122 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2122-2122

Author(s):

Jacob P. Laubach ◽

Noopur Raje ◽

Andrew J. Yee ◽

Philippe Armand ◽

Robert L. Schlossman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Median Number ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Purpose: This phase 1/2 study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of the hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide (TH-302) and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Patients & Methods: Patients were enrolled to stage A (evofosfamide + dexamethasone) followed by stage B (evofosfamide + bortezomib + dexamethasone). Stage A enrollment began in March 2012 and ended in May 2014. In total 34 patients were enrolled to stage A, with 31 patients being treated. Stage B enrollment began in June 2014 and ended in July 2015. In total 28 patients were enrolled and treated on stage B. Patients enrolled on study were diagnosed with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), had adequate hepatic, renal, and hematologic function, as well as an ECOG performance status of ≤2, and had all received at least 2 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. In stage B, patients previously receiving bortezomib must not have discontinued due to toxicity. Patients must have had measureable disease as determined by the International Working Group (IMWG) criteria. In stage A, evofosfamide was administered IV in conjunction with a fixed oral dose of 40 mg dexamethasone on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. In stage B, evofosfamide was administered in conjunction with a fixed oral dose of 40 mg dexamethasone and a fixed IV or SC dose of 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib. Stage A dose escalation began at a dose of 240 mg/m2 evofosfamide and increased stepwise in a 3+3 design until reaching the MTD of 480 mg/m2. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was set at 340 mg/m2 and a dose expansion cohort of 15 treated patients were treated at the RP2D. Stage B dose escalation began at a dose of 240 mg/m2 and concluded at the 340 mg/m2 RP2D of stage A. There were no DLTs observed in this cohort. A total of 24 patients were treated at the RP2D. Results: Of the 31 patients treated on stage A, the median age was 65, with a range of 53-86. The median number of prior treatments was 6 (range: 2-13). Of the 28 patients treated on stage B, the median age was 62, with a range of 45-83. The median number of prior treatments was 8 (range: 3 - 16). All patients had prior bortezomib exposure with a median number of bortezomib containing regimens in stage B of 3 (range: 1-6). The most common stage A grade 3/4 events were anemia (36%), neutropenia (32%), thrombocytopenia (39%), leukopenia (23%), cellulitis (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Four pts (13%) discontinued due to an adverse event. The most common Arm B grade 3/4 events were thrombocytopenia (61%), neutropenia (32%), anemia (25%), leukopenia (18%) and pneumonia (14%). Two patients (7%) discontinued due to an adverse event. Of the 31 patients evaluable for response in stage A, 4 Partial Responses and 2 Minimal Responses were reported for a clinical benefit rate of 19%. Twenty patients (65%) in stage A had stable Disease. Of the 28 patients evaluable for response in stage B, 1 Complete Response, 2 Partial Responses and 2 Minimal Responses were reported for a clinical benefit rate of 18%. Eighteen patients (64%) in stage B had Stable Disease. Conclusion: A 340 mg/m2 twice a week dose of the hypoxia- activated agent evofosfamide was established as the recommended Phase 2 dose when combined with dexamethasone with or without bortezomib. Clinical activity was noted along with a majority of patients having stable disease or better even in this heavily pre-treated refractory population of MM. The use of hypoxia-activated agents holds promise as a novel therapeutic target in MM. Disclosures Raje: Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Armand:Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sequenta Inc: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosenblatt:BMS: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; DCPrime: Research Funding. Shain:Amgen/Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Oncopep: Other: Scientific Founder; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Other: Scientific Founder; Sonofi Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Noxxon: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Vorinostat in Combination with Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) and Bortezomib (B) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (R/R MM): Final Results of a Phase I Study,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3985.3985 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3985-3985

Author(s):

Peter M. Voorhees ◽

Cristina Gasparetto ◽

Keren Osman ◽

Kristy L. Richards ◽

Madlyn Ferraro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Systolic Dysfunction ◽

Median Number ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Level 3 ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3985 Introduction: Although the combination of PLD and B improved time to progression (TTP) compared with B alone in patients (pts) with R/R MM, the overall response rate (ORR) of the regimen was only 44%, while TTP was 9.3 months. As such, strategies that build upon the efficacy of this regimen are needed. Vorinostat (V) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has demonstrated additive to synergistic activity with proteasome inhibitors and anthracyclines in preclinical models of MM. We therefore conducted a phase I study evaluating the safety and preliminary efficacy of V when combined with the PLD/B backbone. Patients and Methods: Pts were treated with standard doses of B and PLD (B 1.3mg/m2 on D1, 4, 8, 11, and PLD 30mg/m2 on D4) and escalating doses of V from either D4-11 or D1-14 of a 3-week cycle. Dose escalation followed a standard 3 + 3 design. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM, absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0×109/L, platelets ≥100×109/L, creatinine clearance ≥30mL/min, and adequate hepatic and cardiac function. The primary objective was to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the regimen and the secondary objective was to assess preliminary efficacy. Results: 32 pts were enrolled at the following dose levels: The median age was 61 (39–75) and median β2-microglobulin 3.57 mcg/mL (1.26–10.6). 69% of the pts were male, 31% female. The median time from diagnosis was 46 months (13–155) and median number of prior lines of therapy 2 (1–9). 78% of pts had received prior B, 56% PLD or doxorubicin, 91% thalidomide and/or lenalidomide, and 66% autologous and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. 44% (11 of 25 pts) had disease refractory to prior B-based therapy. The median number of complete cycles administered was 6 (0–15). No patients on dose level 1 or 2 suffered DLTs. One of 6 pts on dose level 3 had a DLT consisting of grade 4 systolic dysfunction in the setting of atrial flutter, which subsequently resolved. Two of 6 pts at dose level 4 experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia in cycle 1, establishing dose level 3 as the MTD. Nine pts experienced serious adverse events at least possibly attributable to protocol therapy, including the 1 case of systolic dysfunction/atrial flutter noted above, 2 cases of nausea and vomiting with dehydration, and diarrhea, diastolic dysfunction, upper respiratory infection, syncopal episode and hypertension in 1 pt each. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 34% of pts (3% grade 4). 4 pts had grade 3 infections (1 attributed to protocol therapy), but no grade 4 infections were seen regardless of attribution. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was documented in 16% and 34%, but no serious hemorrhagic events were seen. Non-hematologic toxicity at least possibly attributable to therapy included fatigue in 63% (16% grade 3, 0% grade 4). GI toxicity was common with anorexia, constipation, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting occurring in 47% (3% grade 3), 50%, 81% (16% grade 3, 3% grade 4), 78% (9% grade 3) and 50% (9% grade 3) of pts, respectively. Peripheral neuropathy at least possibly attributable to therapy was seen in 38% of pts (6% grade 3), while hand-foot syndrome was seen in 25% (9% grade 3). There were no deaths on study. Among 31 evaluable pts, the ORR using International Uniform criteria was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45–81%), and the ≥very good partial remission (VGPR) rate was 29% (95% CI: 14–48%). The ORR + minimal response (MR) rate was 74% (95% CI: 55–88%). Of 14 pts with B-sensitive disease, there was 1 MR, 5 PRs and 5 VGPRs. Two PRs, 2 VGPRs and 1 complete remission (CR) were documented in 6 pts with B-naïve disease. Notably, there were 2 MRs, 4 PRs and 1 CR out of the 11 pts with B-refractory disease. Conclusions: The MTD of vorinostat when added to the PLD/bortezomib backbone is 400 mg administered daily on days 4–11. The ORR is highly promising, with responses seen in pts with bortezomib-naïve, -sensitive and -refractory disease. Although serious toxicities were infrequent, constitutional and GI side effects were highly prevalent. All together, our data support further development of this combination in pts with MM, with special attention to developing strategies and guidelines to better ameliorate toxicity. Disclosures: Voorhees: Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; MedImmune: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Vorinostat for the treatment of relapsed and relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Gasparetto:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richards:Merck: Consultancy. Garcia:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Sigma-Tau: Speakers Bureau. MacLean:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Orlowski:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of Systemic Administration of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Genetically Engineered to Express NIS and Human Interferon, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM), Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), and T-Cell Neoplasms (TCL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119444 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3268-3268

Author(s):

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

Kah-Whye Peng ◽

Stephen J. Russell ◽

Amylou C. Dueck ◽

Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tumor Burden ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Level 1 ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Level 2

Abstract Background: We previously reported successful treatment of myeloma with an oncolytic virus, MMV-NIS. Preexisting immunity against measles made use of that virus unsatisfactory. The Indiana strain of Vesicular Stomatitis Viruses (VSV) are being developed as anticancer drugs for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. To ensure tumor selective replication and spread, we designed the VSV to encode interferon beta. Expression of IFNβ also serves as a STING agonist to activate host immunity against the cancer. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is inserted as a reporter gene into the viral genome to enable noninvasive monitoring of viral spread using PET/CT imaging. We report a Phase I clinical trial of intravenous administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS for relapsed hematological malignancies including MM, AML, and TCL. Methods: Arm A consisted of patients with low tumor burden. Arm B included patients with high tumor burden. Both arms consisted of a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5x10^9 TCID50 (dose level 1) through 5x10^11 TCID50 (dose level 4), given as a single IV dose. In order to obviate potential toxicity from high interferon levels, Arm B received ruxolitinib 15 mg twice daily for 10 days beginning on day -1. The primary objective was determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VSV-IFNβ-NIS alone and in combination with ruxolitinib; secondary objectives include estimating the safety profile and preliminary efficacy. Correlative objectives include monitoring the pharmacodynamics of viral replication through SPECT/CT imaging with NIS gene, viremia, virus shedding, changes in the immune profile of peripheral blood leukocytes, and immunohistochemistry for immune cell infiltrates in tumors. Adverse events (AEs) are reported herein based on CTCAE v4 with the exception of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) which is based on Lee (Blood 2014; 124(2):188-195) criteria. Results: To date, 10 patients have received IV VSV-IFNβ-NIS; 8 in Arm A and 2 in Arm B. In Arm A, 3 patients were treated at dose level 1, 3 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3. At dose level 1, there were three grade 3 hematologic AEs (neutropenia [1], lymphopenia [2]), and no grade 3+ non-hematologic AEs. At dose level 2, there were two grade 3 hematologic AEs (anemia [1], lymphopenia [1]), and two grade 3 non-hematologic AEs (nausea [1], dehydration [1]). A grade 2 CRS by Lee criteria was also observed. At dose level 3, 2 patients have been enrolled and data are maturing for DLT evaluation. In Arm B (VSV + rux), 2 patients have been enrolled and data are maturing for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation. Other grade 1 and 2 toxicities have included fever, hypertension, headache, electrolyte abnormalities, nausea, vomiting, transient elevation of liver function tests and creatinine. All grade 1 and 2 toxicities resolved within 72 hours. Among the 6 patients evaluable for response, there was one partial remission (TCL patient treated at dose level 2), and 5 with progressive disease. Multiple cytokines increased at 4h post infusion of virus, but most returned to baseline levels by 24h.Viremia was detectable in all patients at the end of infusion, and to varying levels at 30 mins, 1, 2, 4, 24, 48h or 72 hours post virus infusion. No persistent viremia was observed. No infectious virus was recovered in buccal swabs or urine and neutralizing anti-VSV antibodies were present by day 29. Extensive immune phenotyping and ELIspot assays for shared antigens are ongoing. Conclusion: In the lowest dose levels tested to date, VSV-IFNβ-NIS has not led to any observed dose limiting toxicity. Dose escalation is ongoing and updated results will be reported. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Peng:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Russell:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Dueck:Bayer: Employment; Phytogine: Employment; Pfizer: Honoraria. Witzig:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Gertz:spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Alnylam: Honoraria. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Novartis: Research Funding. Naik:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Kumar:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Result of a Phase 1 Study of Selinexor in Combination with High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131321 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3314-3314 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Taiga Nishihori ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Jose Ochoa ◽

Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini ◽

Rachid Baz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

High Dose ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Level 3 ◽

Autologous Hct ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Background: High-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a crucial treatment modality for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Strategies to improve the conditioning regimen have been explored with addition of novel targeted therapies previously with limited success. Selinexor, an orally available selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), targeting Exportin-1 (XPO-1), was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for relapsed/refractory MM. Our pre-clinical data show synergy between selinexor and bifunctional alkylating agents in several MM models. Therefore, we hypothesized that the addition of selinexor to high-dose melaphalan would be safe and improve outcomes of autologous HCT in MM. Methods: We designed a single institution, standard 3+3 dose escalation phase 1 study to evaluate the combination of selinexor (given at 40 mg po (dose level 1); 60 mg (dose level 2); and 80 mg (dose level 3) on days -3 and -2 before melphalan) and high-dose melphalan (100 mg/m2 IV on days -3 and -2) as a conditioning regimen for autologous HCT in patients with MM achieving either partial response (PR) or very good partial response (VGPR) after less than 4 lines of systemic anti-myeloma chemotherapy (NCT02780609). The primary objective was to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and identify a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Results: From 08/2017 to 03/2019, a total of 12 MM patients (pts) received autologous HCT under the phase 1 protocol at Moffitt Cancer Center. Baseline characteristics included: a median age of 57 (range, 43-69); M:F = 7:5; IgG subtype=9, light chain type=2, IgD subtype=1; 92% with Durie-Salmon stage 3; 22% with high-risk disease based on del17p/t(4;14) (2/9, n=3 with unknown risk); a median number of induction=1 (range, 1-2); all received bortezomib-based induction, 83% received immunomodulatory agent, 17% received daratumumab. Pre-HCT responses were PR=4; VGPR=8. Pts received a median of 4.16 (range, 2.16-5.73) million CD34+ cells/kg. Neutrophil engraftment occurred with a median of 11 (range 11-12) days, and a platelet engraftment with a median of 15 (range, 10-36) days. Three pts each entered in dose level 1 and 2; and 6 pts at dose level 3. One pt in dose level 2 did not receive dexamethasone on day -1 due to grade (G) 3 hyperglycemia. One pt in dose level 3 (80 mg selinexor) did not receive day -2 dose of selinexor due to liver function test (LFT) abnormality (ALT > 2x ULN) which was considered as dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) as second dose of selinexor was not given. LFTs normalized after HCT. Dose level 3 was expanded to 3 additional pts and no additional DLTs were observed. Treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) included: G3 febrile neutropenia=3, G3 diarrhea=1, G3 nausea=1, G3 small bowel obstruction=1, G3 acute kidney injury=1, G3 lung infection=1. Post-HCT responses at day +90 were complete response (CR)=2, VGPR=6, PR=3, and progression=1. CR conversion rate was 16.7% though phase 1 portion of the study was not powered to evaluate the CR rate. Therefore, RP2D was established as selinexor 80 mg on days -3 and -2. The study is proceeding to the phase 2 portion to assess the efficacy of this combination. Conclusions: The combination with selinexor 80 mg po with high-dose melphalan at 100 mg/m2 on days -3 and -2 (dose level 3) was well tolerated and engraftment kinetics were not altered. A phase 2 study of selinexor 80 mg with high-dose melphalan and autologous HCT is ongoing (NCT02780609). Disclosures Nishihori: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Alsina:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Baz:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Shain:Sanofi Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brayer:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sullivan:Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Selinexor in combination with high-dose melphalan

Download Full-text

Novel Three– and Four–Drug Combinations of Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, and Lenalidomide, for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Encouraging Results From the Multi-Center, Randomized, Phase 2 EVOLUTION Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.127.127 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 127-127 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Shaji Kumar ◽

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Parameswaran N. Hari ◽

Natalie Callander ◽

Stephen J. Noga ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Highly Active ◽

Evolution Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 127 Two- and three-drug regimens incorporating bortezomib (Velcade®, Vc), lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Rev), dexamethasone (Dex), and cyclophosphamide (Cy) (Vc–Dex, Rev–Dex, Vc–Dex–Rev [VDR], and Vc–Dex–Cy [VDC]), have been shown to be effective and well tolerated in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM). Combining Vc and Dex with Rev and Cy in a novel four-drug regimen (VDCR) may result in even greater activity with improved quality and duration of response. Results from the phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the multi-center EVOLUTION study showed that the VDCR regimen is a highly active and generally well-tolerated induction therapy in previously untreated MM patients (pts). Here we report the efficacy and safety of VDR, VDC, and VDCR from the non-comparative phase 2 portion of the study. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive up to eight 21-d cycles of VDR (Vc 1.3 mg/m2 d 1, 4, 8, 11; Dex 40 mg d 1, 8, 15; Rev 25 mg d 1–14) or VDC (VD as in VDR, plus Cy 500 mg/m2 d 1, 8) or VDCR (VDC plus Rev 15 mg d 1–14) as induction therapy, followed by Vc 1.3 mg/m2 (d 1, 8, 15, 22) for four 42-d maintenance cycles in all treatment arms. Pts received prophylactic antibiotics, acyclovir, transfusion support, and anticoagulants as required. Eligible pts wishing to undergo autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) could undergo stem cell mobilization any time after cycle 2, and undergo ASCT any time after cycle 4. Response categories were based on the IMWG Criteria with the addition of near complete response (nCR). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the CTCAE v3.0. Results: In the VDR, VDC, and VDCR arms 42, 32, and 43 pts (including 6 pts treated at the maximum planned dose of Cy (500 mg/m2) from phase 1) have been treated, and 42, 31, and 33 are evaluable for response, respectively, as of data cut-off (31 July 2009). Median ages in the VDR, VDC, and VDCR arms were 60, 62, and 62 years, respectively; 62%, 63%, and 66% had International Staging System stage lI/III disease, and 38%, 25%, and 33% had Karnofsky Performance Status ≤80%, respectively. The median number of VDR, VDC, and VDCR cycles received is 4.5, 6, and 4, respectively (range 1–12). Best unconfirmed response rates are shown in the Table; patients categorized as very good partial response (VGPR) include those who have no measurable M-protein but have not yet had bone marrow assessments to confirm CR/nCR status. The overall rates of treatment-emergent AEs were 95%, 97%, and 88% for the VDR, VDC, and VDCR arms, respectively, with ≥grade 3 reported in 67%, 59%, and 65%. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was reported as grade 2/3 in 12%/12% in the VDR, 31%/3% in the VDC, and 12%/9% in the VDCR arms; there was no grade 4 PN reported. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 5%/5%, 28%/13%, and 23%/9% of pts in the VDR, VDC, and VDCR arms, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 5%/2%, 9%/0%, and 5%/0% of pts, respectively. One case of grade 3 deep-vein thrombosis was reported in the VDCR arm. Overall rates of serious AEs were 24%, 13%, and 37% in the VDR, VDC, and VDCR arms, respectively. Two pts have died in the VDCR arm, both due to renal failure, considered possibly treatment-related. To date, 6 pts have undergone ASCT in the VDR arm, 5 in the VDC arm, and 3 in the VDCR arm. Median CD34+ yield was 4.7, 6.3, and 6.8 × 106/kg in the VDR, VDC, and VDCR arms, respectively. Conclusions: VDR, VDC, and VDCR are highly active and generally well-tolerated regimens in previously untreated MM. Response rates in the VDCR arm appeared somewhat higher than in the VDR and VDC arms at this early time point, although there also appeared to be higher rates of serious AEs, including possible treatment-related mortality in the VDCR arm. Following an interim analysis, dosing in the VDC arm was modified to include Cy on day 15 to examine if this will improve CR rates. Ten pts have been enrolled to date. Disclosures: Kumar: CELGENE: Research Funding; MILLENNIUM: Research Funding; BAYER: Research Funding; GENZYME: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding. Flinn:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hari:Milennium Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Callander:Millenium: Research Funding. Noga:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stewart:Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria. Raje:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Rifkin:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Shi:Millennium Pharmaceutical Inc.: Employment. Webb:Millennium: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text