Phase 1 Results of Anti-PD-Ligand 1 (Durvalumab) & Lenalidomide in Patients with Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma and Correlation with Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Gene Expression Profile

Background: T cells in CTCL are functionally exhausted and are characterized by the expression of immune inhibitory molecules such as PD1 and PD-L1 (Cancer Immunol Res 6; 2018). These findings justify the evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibition to reverse T cell exhaustion in CTCL. We initiated a phase 1/2 clinical trial of lenalidomide and durvalumab to determine the safety and efficacy of this regimen. Durvalumab is a human monoclonal antibody with high affinity and selectivity for PD-L1, targeting exhausted T cells and distinct cells within their environment. Lenalidomide, an oral immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and analog of thalidomide, has previously shown activity in CTCL (Blood 123; 2014). Durvalumab may restore an anti-tumor immune response, and the combination of durvalumab and lenalidomide may enhance immune checkpoint blockade-induced immune responses. Associations between immune checkpoints, gene expression profile and the clinical efficacy of durvalumab/lenalidomide combination were evaluated. The primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide in combination with durvalumab and safety with primary endpoint of toxicity (using CTCAE 4.03). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and median duration. Relationships between gene expression profile (GEP), PD-L1 expression, and antitumor activity were exploratory end points. Methods: A Phase 1 portion (NCT03011814) is ongoing to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the durvalumab and lenalidomide combination. Pts are enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive durvalumab (fixed dose at 1500 mg) and dose escalation of lenalidomide (dose level 1 = 10 mg for all cycles; dose level 2 = 10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for all subsequent cycles; dose level 3 =10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for cycle 2, and 20 mg for all subsequent cycles) to characterize safety, efficacy and antitumor activity. Serial skin samples were collected to assess the impact on the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor activity. Results: Ten pts. were evaluable for toxicities. Nine patients were evaluable for response with three patients at each dose level. 8 males/2 females, age 29-59 y, with refractory/advanced CTCL, clinical stages IB (1), IIA (3), IIB (4), IIIA (1), and aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ CTCL (1) and a median of prior systemic treatments of 3 (range, 2-4) have been enrolled. Median follow up time was 12 (range, 3-24+) months. No serious AEs or DLTs were observed during the DLT evaluation period (cycles 1-3). The most frequently reported AEs were fatigue (n=7), skin pain (n=4), chills (n=3), anemia (n=3), and leukopenia (4). One grade 3 maculopapular rash (possibly due to lenalidomide) was observed, all other treatment-related AEs were grade 1/2 in severity. Median cycles of treatment were 7 (range, 3-20+) months. Median duration of response was 4 (range, 1- 21+) months. Six pts achieved PR, while 3 pts maintained stable disease. Three pts remain on treatment. Expression panels of several checkpoints (PD1, PD-L1 & ICOS) (Cycle1 Day1 vs Cycle 2 Day15) were analyzed. Detectable levels of PD-L1 but low levels of ICOS are observed in responding pts vs. high PD-L1 and ICOS levels in non-responders. GEP highlights downregulation of TNF-alpha signaling via NFkB, IFN-gamma, and PI3-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways among other pathways. Conclusions: Durvalumab/lenalidomide has significant clinical activity in refractory/advanced CTCL, which will be formally evaluated in the Phase 2 portion. Responses were durable and ongoing, and treatment was well tolerated. Dose escalation is up to lenalidomide 20 mg daily. Our preliminary results from pts on trial demonstrated that immune signatures on skin biopsies at baseline may be predictive of response to checkpoint blockade and yield insights into mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. Disclosures Querfeld: Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Soligenix: Other: Investigator; Celgene: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; City of Hope Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute: Employment; Medivir: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; miRagen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Eisai: Other: Investigator; Elorac: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Helsinn: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator. Palmer:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

The Result of a Phase 1 Study of Selinexor in Combination with High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131321 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3314-3314 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Taiga Nishihori ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Jose Ochoa ◽

Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini ◽

Rachid Baz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

High Dose ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Level 3 ◽

Autologous Hct ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Background: High-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a crucial treatment modality for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Strategies to improve the conditioning regimen have been explored with addition of novel targeted therapies previously with limited success. Selinexor, an orally available selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), targeting Exportin-1 (XPO-1), was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for relapsed/refractory MM. Our pre-clinical data show synergy between selinexor and bifunctional alkylating agents in several MM models. Therefore, we hypothesized that the addition of selinexor to high-dose melaphalan would be safe and improve outcomes of autologous HCT in MM. Methods: We designed a single institution, standard 3+3 dose escalation phase 1 study to evaluate the combination of selinexor (given at 40 mg po (dose level 1); 60 mg (dose level 2); and 80 mg (dose level 3) on days -3 and -2 before melphalan) and high-dose melphalan (100 mg/m2 IV on days -3 and -2) as a conditioning regimen for autologous HCT in patients with MM achieving either partial response (PR) or very good partial response (VGPR) after less than 4 lines of systemic anti-myeloma chemotherapy (NCT02780609). The primary objective was to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and identify a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Results: From 08/2017 to 03/2019, a total of 12 MM patients (pts) received autologous HCT under the phase 1 protocol at Moffitt Cancer Center. Baseline characteristics included: a median age of 57 (range, 43-69); M:F = 7:5; IgG subtype=9, light chain type=2, IgD subtype=1; 92% with Durie-Salmon stage 3; 22% with high-risk disease based on del17p/t(4;14) (2/9, n=3 with unknown risk); a median number of induction=1 (range, 1-2); all received bortezomib-based induction, 83% received immunomodulatory agent, 17% received daratumumab. Pre-HCT responses were PR=4; VGPR=8. Pts received a median of 4.16 (range, 2.16-5.73) million CD34+ cells/kg. Neutrophil engraftment occurred with a median of 11 (range 11-12) days, and a platelet engraftment with a median of 15 (range, 10-36) days. Three pts each entered in dose level 1 and 2; and 6 pts at dose level 3. One pt in dose level 2 did not receive dexamethasone on day -1 due to grade (G) 3 hyperglycemia. One pt in dose level 3 (80 mg selinexor) did not receive day -2 dose of selinexor due to liver function test (LFT) abnormality (ALT > 2x ULN) which was considered as dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) as second dose of selinexor was not given. LFTs normalized after HCT. Dose level 3 was expanded to 3 additional pts and no additional DLTs were observed. Treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) included: G3 febrile neutropenia=3, G3 diarrhea=1, G3 nausea=1, G3 small bowel obstruction=1, G3 acute kidney injury=1, G3 lung infection=1. Post-HCT responses at day +90 were complete response (CR)=2, VGPR=6, PR=3, and progression=1. CR conversion rate was 16.7% though phase 1 portion of the study was not powered to evaluate the CR rate. Therefore, RP2D was established as selinexor 80 mg on days -3 and -2. The study is proceeding to the phase 2 portion to assess the efficacy of this combination. Conclusions: The combination with selinexor 80 mg po with high-dose melphalan at 100 mg/m2 on days -3 and -2 (dose level 3) was well tolerated and engraftment kinetics were not altered. A phase 2 study of selinexor 80 mg with high-dose melphalan and autologous HCT is ongoing (NCT02780609). Disclosures Nishihori: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Alsina:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Baz:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Shain:Sanofi Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brayer:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sullivan:Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Selinexor in combination with high-dose melphalan

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Results of Anti-PD-Ligand 1 (Durvalumab) & Lenalidomide in Patients with Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma and Correlation with Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Gene Expression Profile

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143354 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 20-20

Author(s):

Christiane Querfeld ◽

Ni-Chun Tsai ◽

Joycelynne Palmer ◽

Xochiquetzal U. Martinez ◽

Farah Abdulla ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Antitumor Activity ◽

Gene Expression Profile ◽

Dose Level ◽

Expression Profile ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Level 3 ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2

Background:T cells in CTCL are functionally exhausted and are characterized by the expression of immune inhibitory molecules such as PD1 and PD-L1 (Cancer Immunol Res 6; 2018). These findings justify the evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibition to reverse T cell exhaustion in CTCL. We initiated a phase 1/2 clinical trial of lenalidomide and durvalumab (NCT03011814) to determine the safety and efficacy of this regimen. Durvalumab is a human monoclonal antibody with high affinity and selectivity for PD-L1, targeting exhausted T cells and distinct cells within their environment. Lenalidomide, an oral immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and analog of thalidomide, has previously shown activity in CTCL (Blood 123; 2014). Durvalumab may restore an anti-tumor immune response, and the combination of durvalumab and lenalidomide may enhance immune checkpoint blockade-induced immune responses. Associations between immune checkpoints, gene expression profile and the clinical efficacy of durvalumab/ lenalidomide combination were evaluated. The primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide in combination with durvalumab and safety with primary endpoint of toxicity (using CTCAE 4.03). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and median duration. Relationships between gene expression profile (GEP), PD-L1 expression, and antitumor activity were exploratory end points. Methods:Phase 1 portion to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the durvalumab and lenalidomide combination has completed enrollment. Pts were enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive durvalumab (fixed dose at 1500 mg) and dose escalation of lenalidomide (dose level 1 = 10 mg for all cycles; dose level 2 = 10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for all subsequent cycles; dose level 3 =10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for cycle 2, and 20 mg for all subsequent cycles) to characterize safety, efficacy and antitumor activity. Serial skin samples were collected to assess the impact on the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor activity. Results:Thirteen pts. were evaluable for toxicities and 12 patients evaluable for response. 10 males/3 females, median age 36 (29-72 y), with aggressive or refractory/advanced CTCL, clinical stages IB (2), IIA (3), IIB (6), IIIA (1), and aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ CTCL (1) and a median of prior systemic treatments of 3 (range, 2-8) have been enrolled. Dose level 1 (n=3), dose level 2 (n= 3), dose level 3 (n=4). Median follow up time was 16.1 months (range, 3.7-36.1) months. No serious AEs or DLTs were observed during the DLT evaluation period (cycles 1-3). The most frequently reported AEs were fatigue (n=8), skin pain (n=4), chills (n=3), anemia (n=3), and leukopenia (4). One grade 3 maculopapular rash (possibly due to lenalidomide) was observed, all other treatment-related AEs were grade 1/2 in severity. One patient discontinued treatment due to fatigue. Three patients developed grade 1/2 autoimmune thyroiditis that resolved with treatment. Median cycles of treatment were 7 (range, 1-28). Median duration of response was 6 (range, 1- 28+) months. Nine pts achieved PR, 2 pts maintained stable disease and 2 pts developed PD. Five pts remain on treatment. Gene expression levels for several checkpoints (PD1, PD-L1 & ICOS) (Cycle1 Day1 vs Cycle 2 Day15) were analyzed. Gene expression profile highlights downregulation of TNF-alpha signaling via NFkB, IFN-gamma, and PI3-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways in responders; up-regulation of MYC targets, IL2-, JAK-STAT and pro-inflammatory pathways were seen in PD compared to responders. Conclusions:Anti-PD-L1/lenalidomide has significant clinical activity in refractory/advanced CTCL, which will be formally evaluated in the Phase 2 portion. Responses were durable and ongoing, and treatment was well tolerated. Dose escalation is up to maximum dose of 20 mg lenalidomide daily. Our preliminary results reveal adaptive and innate immune signatures that may be predictive of response to checkpoint blockade and yield insights into mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. Disclosures Querfeld: MiRagen:Consultancy;Stemline:Consultancy;Trillium:Consultancy;Celgene:Research Funding;Kyowa Kirin:Consultancy;Helsinn:Consultancy;Bioniz:Consultancy.Abdulla:Johnson Johnson:Research Funding;Mallinckrodt:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.Rosen:Seattle Genetics:Consultancy;NeoGenomics:Consultancy;Aileron Therapeutics:Consultancy;Novartis:Consultancy;Pebromene:Consultancy;Celgene:Speakers Bureau;paradigm Medical Communications:Speakers Bureau;Abbvie:Speakers Bureau.Zain:Mundi Pharma:Research Funding;Seattle Genetics:Research Funding;Kyowa Kirin:Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Trial of Weekly Escalated Dose Bortezomib Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients in First Relapse or Primary Refractory Disease after First Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4735.4735 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4735-4735

Author(s):

Annemiek Broijl ◽

Marie José Kersten ◽

Wendim Ghidey Alemayehu ◽

Mark-David Levin ◽

Okke de Weerdt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Median Number ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide monotherapy, as well as in combination with dexamethasone and chemotherapy, have shown high overall response rates (ORR) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Recently, the combination of Bortezomib (1.0 mg/m2), Lenalidomide (15 mg) and Dexamethasone was reported to show efficacy in RRMM. (Richardson, Blood 2014) Here, we report the long-time follow-up results of a multicenter, dose-escalating phase I-II trial, HOVON86, which evaluated the effect of weekly escalated dose Bortezomib combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone as reinduction treatment followed by Lenalidomide monotherapy for maintenance treatment in patients with RRMM after first line therapy. (Trial EudraCTnr 2007-002533-37) Methods In the dose escalation part of the study, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose level (RDL) of weekly Bortezomib and Lenalidomide with Dexamethasone were determined according to a 3 + 3' dose-escalation scheme. A maximum of 4 dose levels were planned. Bortezomib was administered once weekly by rapid intravenous administration on days 1, 8, and 15, at a starting dose of 1.3 mg/m2 and planned to be escalated to 1.6 mg/m2, Lenalidomide was administered days 1-21 followed by a one-week interval at a starting dose of 10 mg/day and planned to be increased to 15 mg at dose level 3 and 4. Low dose Dexamethasone was added at a fixed dose of 20 mg days 1,2,8,9,15, and 16. Cycles were repeated at 28 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. The MTD was defined as the level with 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) minus 1 level. A phase II part of the study was performed at the MTD level. All patients received Lenalidomide maintenance at a dose of 10 mg/day, days 1-21 in 28 day cycles until relapse or progression. Patients received valaciclovir prophylaxis with Bortezomib and prophylactic salicylic acid throughout treatment. Results 81 patients with a first RRMM were enrolled, 4 patients were non-eligible based on not having measurable disease. The median age of all 77 evaluable patients at enrollment was 66 years (range, 46–84), 64% male, and 26%/5% of patients had ISS II/III disease. In the Phase 1 part, 15 patients received Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone according to dose level 1: 1.3 mg/m2/10mg/20mg (n=3), dose level 2: 1.6 mg/m2/10mg/20mg (n=6) or dose level 3: 1.6 mg/m2/15mg/20mg (n=6). The DLT was reached at the 3rd dose level, due to two grade 3 non-hematological DLT's. There were no DLT's in dose level 1 or 2. Therefore, the RDL for the phase 2 part was established at Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2, Lenalidomide 10 mg, Dexamethasone 20 mg. In the Phase 2 part of the study, the ORR after induction in 70 patients at the RDL of Phase I (n=6) and in Phase II (n=64), was 89%, with 64% CR +VGPR, table 1. The median number of cycles to achieve ≥PR was 1, while the median number of cycles to maximum response was 2. The median duration of response was 28 months. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 19 and 42 months, respectively, Figure 1. The median time to progression was 27 months; the median time to next treatment was 19 months. Prognostic factors associated with PFS included complex karyotype, defined as showing 3 or more abnormalities; no prognostic factors were identified in association with OS. Hematologic toxicity NCI-CTC grade 1-4 occurred in 33/70 (47%) of patients, including 30% grade 3-4. Infectious complications concerned grade 2 in 29% and grade 3 in 16% of patients. Thrombo-embolic events (VTE) occurred in 2 patients (3%). 41/70 (59%) patients developed polyneuropathy (PN) grade ≥ 1; of these 41 patients, 18 patients experienced sensory PN, 2 patients had motor PN, and in 21 cases the type of PN was not further specified. 29 (41%) patients had grade 1-2, and the remaining 12 (17%) patients had grade 3-4 PN. 12/29 (41%) patients received a dose reduction upon development of PN grade 1-2, 11/12 (92%) patients upon development of grade 3-4 PN. 19/29 (66%) patients with grade 1-2 PN showed a complete recovery as compared to 6/12 (50%) patients with grade 3-4 PN. Conclusion Weekly Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 plus Lenalidomide 10 mg/day, combined with low-dose Dexamethason is a feasible, effective treatment for relapsed, refractory patients with manageable toxicity. Table 1 Phase 1: n(%) Phase 2: n(%) Total: n(%) Total 6 64 70 CR+VGPR No 3(50%) 2(34%) 25(36%) Yes 3(50%) 42(66%) 45(64%) ORR: ≥PR No 1(17%) 7(11%) 8(11%) Yes 5(83%) 57(89%) 62(89%) Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Kersten: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vellenga:Janssen: Research Funding. Bos:celgene: Research Funding. Lokhorst:Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results of a Phase 2 Study of PD 0332991 in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2940.2940 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2940-2940

Author(s):

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Luciano J Costa ◽

Nisreen A. Haideri ◽

Georg Hess ◽

Seema Singhal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

D 20 ◽

Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1/2 Study of Nexi-001 Donor-Derived Multi-Antigen Specific CD8+ T Cells for the Treatment of Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152419 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4819-4819

Author(s):

Monzr M. Al Malki ◽

Sumithira Vasu ◽

Dipenkumar Modi ◽

Miguel-Angel Perales ◽

Lucy Y Ghoda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cd8 T Cells ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Over Time

Abstract Patients who relapse after allogeneic HCT have a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options. Responses to salvage therapy with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are driven by a graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect. However, relapses and moderate to severe graft versus host disease (GVHD) are common. Therapies that increase the GvL effect without inducing GVHD are needed. The NEXI-001 study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 trial designed to characterize the safety, immunogenic, and antitumor activity of the NEXI-001 antigen specific T-cell product. This product is a donor-derived non-genetically engineered therapy that consists of populations of CD8+ T cells that recognize HLA 02.01-restricted peptides from the WT1, PRAME, and Cyclin A1 antigens. These T cells consist of populations with key memory phenotypes, including stem-like memory, central memory, and effector memory cells, with a low proportion (<5%) of potentially allogeneic-reactive T-naïve cells. Patients enrolled into the first cohort of the dose escalation phase received a single infusion of 50 million (M) to 100M cells of the NEXI-001 product. Bridging anti-AML treatment was permitted during the manufacture of the cellular product with a wash-out period of at least 14 days prior to lymphodepletion (LD) chemotherapy (intravenous fludarabine 30 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m 2) that was administered on Days -5, -4, and -3 prior to the infusion of the NEXI-001 product up to 72 hours later (Day1). Lymphocyte recovery to baseline levels occurred as early as three days after the NEXI-001 product infusion with robust CD4 and CD8 T cell reconstitution after LD chemotherapy. NEXI-001 antigen specific T cells were detectable in peripheral blood (PB) by multimer staining and were found to proliferate over time and to traffic to bone marrow. The phenotype composition of detectable antigen specific T cells at both sites was that of the infused product. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing assays revealed T cell clones in the NEXI-001 product that were not detected in PB of patients tested at baseline. These unique clones subsequently expanded in PB and bone marrow (BM) and persisted over time. Neutrophil recovery, decreased transfusion burden of platelets and red blood cells, and increased donor chimerism were observed. Decreases in myeloblasts and reduction in the size of an extramedullary myeloid sarcoma were suggestive of clinical activity. One patient, a 23-year- old with MRD+ disease at baseline, received two doses of 200M NEXI-001 cells separated by approximately 2 months. Following the first infusion, antigen specific CD8+ T cells increased gradually in PB to 9% of the total CD3+ T cell population just prior to the second infusion and were found to have trafficked to bone marrow. By Day 2 following the second infusion, which was not preceded by LD chemotherapy, the antigen specific CD8+ T cells again increased to 9% of the total CD3+ T cell population in PB and remained at ≥5% until the end of study visit a month later. The absolute lymphocyte count increased by 50% highlighting continued expansion of the NEXI-001 T cells. These cells also maintained significant Tscm populations. Treatment related adverse events, including infusion reactions, GVHD, CRS, and neurotoxicity (ICANS), have not developed in these patients who have received 50M to 200M T cells of the NEXI-001 product either as single or repeat infusions. In conclusion, these results show that infusion of the NEXI-001 product is safe and capable of generating a cell-mediated immune response with early signs of clinical activity. A second infusion is associated with increasing the level of antigen specific CD8+ T cells and their persistence in PB and BM. TCR sequencing and RNA Seq transcriptional profiling of the CD8+ T cells are planned, and these data will be available for presentation during the ASH conference. At least two cycles of 200M NEXI-001 cells weekly x 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle is planned for the next dose-escalation cohort. Early data suggest that the NEXI-001 product has the potential to enhance a GvL effect with minimal GVHD-associated toxicities. Disclosures Al Malki: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy. Vasu: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Modi: MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding. Perales: Sellas Life Sciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other; Omeros: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other; Equilium: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medigene: Honoraria; NexImmune: Honoraria; Cidara: Honoraria; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other; Servier: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Other. Edavana: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Lu: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Kim: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Suarez: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Oelke: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Bednarik: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Knight: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Varela: Kite: Speakers Bureau; Nexlmmune: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

CD200 Is a Stem Cell-Specific Immunosuppressive Target in AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114818 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2768-2768

Author(s):

Shelley Herbrich ◽

Keith Baggerly ◽

Gheath Alatrash ◽

R. Eric Davis ◽

Michael Andreeff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

T Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd200 Receptor ◽

Blast Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) stem cells (LSC) are an extremely rare fraction of the overall disease (likely <0.3%), largely quiescent, and capable of both long-term self-renewal and production of more differentiated leukemic blasts. Besides their role in disease initiation, they are also hypothesized as the likely source of deadly, relapsed leukemia. Due to the quiescent nature of the LSCs, they are capable of evading the majority of chemotherapeutic agents that rely on active cell-cycling for cytotoxicity. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches specifically engineered to eradicate LSCs are critical for curing AML. We previously introduced a novel bioinformatics approach that harnessed publically available AML gene expression data to identify genes significantly over-expressed in LSCs when compared to their normal hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) counterparts (Herbrich et al Blood 2017 130:3962). These datasets contain gene expression arrays on human AML patient samples sorted by leukemia stem, progenitor, and blast cells (with normal hematopoietic cell subsets for comparison). We have since expanded our statistical model to identify targets that are both significantly overexpressed in AML LSCs when compared to HSC as well as LSCs compared to their corresponding, more differentiated blast cells. Instead of traditional methods for multiple testing corrections, we looked at the intersection of genes that met the above criteria in 3 independently generated datasets. This resulted in a list of 30 genes, 28 of which appear to be novel markers of AML LSCs. From this list, we first chose to focus on CD200, a type-1 transmembrane glycoprotein. CD200 is broadly expressed on myeloid, lymphoid, and epithelial cells, while the CD200 receptor (CD200R) expression is strictly confined to myeloid and a subset of T cells. CD200 has been shown to have an immunosuppressive effect on macrophages and NK cells and correlates with a high prevalence FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Coles et al Leukemia 2012; 26:2146-2148). Additionally, CD200 has been implicated as a poor prognostic marker in AML (Damiani et al Oncotarget 2015; 6:30212-30221). To date, we have screened 20 primary AML patient samples by flow cytometry, 90% of which are positive for CD200. Expression is significantly enriched in the CD34+/CD123+ stem cell compartment. To examine the role of CD200 in AML, we established two in vitro model systems. First, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to knockout the endogenous CD200 protein in Kasumi-1. Further, we induced CD200 in the OCI-AML3 cell line that had no expression at baseline. Both cell lines did not express the CD200 receptor before or after manipulation, negating any autocrine signaling. In both systems, CD200 manipulation did not affect the proliferation rate or viability of the cells. To examine the immune function of CD200 in AML, we performed a series of mixed lymphocyte reactions. We cultured normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with the CD200+ or CD200- cells from each line both. Cells were incubated in the culture media for 4-48 hours before being harvested and measured by flow cytometry for apoptosis or intracellular cytokine production. The presence of CD200 on the cell surface reduced the rate of immune-specific apoptosis among these leukemia cells. The difference in cell killing was most likely attributable to a CD200-specific suppression of CD107a, a surrogate marker or cytotoxic activity. In the OCI-AML3 model, PBMCs co-cultured with CD200+ cells produced approximately 40% less CD107a when compared to the CD200- co-culture. Additionally, we characterized our new cell lines using RNA sequencing. By comparing the CD200+ to the CD200- cells within each line, we observed that CD200+ cells significantly downregulate genes involved in defining an inflammatory response as well as genes regulated by NF-κB in response to TNFα. This indicates that CD200 may have an undiscovered intrinsic role in suppressing the immune microenvironment of AML LSCs. In conclusion, we have expanded our novel bioinformatics approach for robustly identifying AML LSC-specific targets. Additionally, we have shown that one of these markers, CD200, has a potential role as a stem cell-specific immunosuppressive target by reducing immune-mediated apoptosis and transcriptionally suppressing inflammatory cell processes. We are extending our study to explore CD200 in primary patient samples using a CD200-blocking antibody. Disclosures Andreeff: SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Reata: Equity Ownership; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer ; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ruxopeg, a Multi-Center Bayesian Phase 1/2 Adaptive Randomized Trial of the Combination of Ruxolitinib and Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN)-Associated Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110785 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 581-581 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Juliette Soret-Dulphy ◽

Matthieu Resche-Rigon ◽

Francoise Boyer-Perrard ◽

Fiorenza Barraco ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Interferon Alpha ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Disease Assessment ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allele Burden ◽

Dose Combination

Abstract Background MPN-associated myelofibrosis (MF) is a condition characterized by splenomegaly, anemia, bone marrow (BM) fibrosis and debilitating symptoms. About 80% of patients (pts) harbor a driver mutations in JAK2, CALR or MPL genes that can be used as biomarkers for minimal residual disease assessment. Ruxolitinib (Rux) is a JAK inhibitor approved in intermediate or high risk (HR) MF to improve symptoms and splenomegaly but with little impact on the malignant clone and fibrosis. Interferon alpha (IFNa) can reduce mutant allele burden and fibrosis but is often poorly tolerated in highly symptomatic pts. The RUXOPEG study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of Rux + IFNa in MF (NCT02742324). Methods RUXOPEG is a multi-center Bayesian Phase 1/2 adaptive trial. Phase 1 includes up to 9 cohorts of 3 pts with increasing doses of both drugs. Tested doses of Rux and IFNa are 10, 15 and 20 mg BID, and 45, 90 and 135 mcg/week, respectively. Phase 2 will randomize between the 2 best dose combinations selected from phase 1. Primary objective: identify the most efficacious dose combination that also satisfies safety requirements. Primary tolerance criterion is the occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT) within 45 days; primary efficacy criterion is >50% reduction in spleen length within 6 months. Secondary objectives include molecular response, reduction of BM fibrosis, quality of life and symptoms evolution, event-free and overall survival. The planned total enrollment is 42 pts. Key inclusion criteria are: diagnosis of MF (WHO criteria), intermediate or HR (IPSS), need of active therapy, presence of a driver mutation. Key exclusion criteria: prior treatment (or contra-indication) with Rux or IFNa, eligibility for stem cell transplantation, inadequate liver, cardiac or renal function, autoimmune disease, history of depression. Enrolment in 5 cohorts was completed in June 2018, and the last cohort for phase 1 will be opened in August. This abstract reports the current available data for the 5 cohorts who have completed the primary endpoint, but the presentation will provide the detailed analysis of primary and secondary endpoints of phase 1, which will be available in October 2018. Results Among the 15 pts currently enrolled in phase 1, 6 were females, mean age was 60.9 years (range: 38-72), 8 had primary MF, 5 post ET and 2 post PV MF. Median spleen size was 6 cm (range 0 - 18) by palpation and 18 cm (range 10-25) by imaging. Mean (range) blood counts were: hemoglobin 12 g/dL (8.5 - 13.8), WBC 18.3 G/L (8 - 35.5), platelets 457 G/L (157 - 906) and 6 pts had circulating blasts. 12 pts had JAK2V617F and 2 had CALR mutations; karytotype was normal in 9 pts, abnormal in 5 (very HR in 3). In 10 pts analyzed by NGS so far, 8 had additional mutations (1 in 5 pts, 3 in 1, and 4 in 2) in TET2 (n= 5), ASXL1 (4), DNMT3A (2), TP53 (2), SF3B1 (1) and SRSF2 (1) genes. Safety: No DLT was observed in the 5 cohorts (primary safety criterion), the highest tested dose combination being Rux 15 mg BID + IFNa 135 mcg/week. The last cohort will test Rux 20 mg BID + IFNa 135 mcg/week. 4 serious adverse events have been reported: 1 AML transformation (very HR cytogenetics, 3% circulating blasts at baseline), 1 thrombotic event, 1 squamous cell carcinoma and 1 aggravation of Raynaud's phenomenon. Efficacy: preliminary data show a clear decrease in spleen size at 6 months (median 0 cm by palpation, range 0-9; 12.1 cm by imaging, range 10-21) and improvement in blood counts (mean, range): hemoglobin 10.5 g/dL (9.7 - 12.5), WBC 8.6 G/L (5.4 - 11.1), platelets 267 G/L (80 - 486). According to IWG criteria, all the 10 pts evaluable at time of abstract preparation responded (3 partial response, 7 hematological improvement). JAK2V617F allele burden decreased from a mean of 75% (range 43- 96) at baseline to 46% (range 24 - 84) at 6 months. Encouraging results were also found in a patient with 5 mutations (figure1) with a clear decrease in JAK2V617F, ASXL1, DNMT3A and EZH2 mutations after 12 months of treatment. Conclusion RUXOPEG is the first study to formally assess the safety and efficacy of Rux + IFNa combination in MF patients never exposed to either drugs before. The first 5 dose combinations tested showed no DLT, confirming that this combination was generally well tolerated. Preliminary efficacy results are encouraging, including in patients who received very low doses of both drugs. Full results of the 6 cohorts tested in phase 1 and doses selected for phase 2 will be presented. Disclosures Kiladjian: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Giraudier:Novartis: Research Funding. Cassinat:Novartis: Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Prophylaxis with Concizumab in Patients with Hemophilia a or B with Inhibitors: Results from explorer4, a Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122809 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1139-1139

Author(s):

Amy Shapiro ◽

Giancarlo Castaman ◽

Katarina Cepo ◽

Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen ◽

Christian Hollensen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Research ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Prophylactic Treatment ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Research Protocol ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clinical Research Protocol ◽

On Demand

Introduction Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) monoclonal antibody in clinical development for the subcutaneous prophylactic treatment of hemophilia patients. We present results from the main part (at least 24 weeks) of the concizumab explorer4 phase 2 trial (NCT03196284) in hemophilia A/B with inhibitor (HAwI/HBwI) patients. Methods The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of once-daily subcutaneous concizumab in preventing bleeds in HAwI/HBwI patients. Secondary objectives were the assessment of safety, including concomitant use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), and immunogenicity. Patients were randomized 2:1 to concizumab prophylaxis or rFVIIa on-demand treatment via an interactive web-response system. A concizumab loading dose (0.5 mg/kg) was administered, followed by 0.15 mg/kg daily with potential dose escalation to 0.20 and 0.25 mg/kg. Efficacy was evaluated as the number of bleeding episodes (annualized bleeding rate [ABR]) at last dose level. The number of adverse events (AEs) and the occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), as well as coagulation-related parameters were evaluated. Concizumab and free TFPI plasma levels were measured by ELISA, and peak thrombin generation (TG) potential using a standardized assay. Results 26 patients were randomized; 9 HAwI and 8 HBwI patients were exposed to concizumab, and 9 patients to rFVIIa (7 with HAwI and 2 with HBwI). All 25 patients who completed the main 24-week part of the trial chose to continue to the extension part. The estimated ABR at the last dose level for concizumab prophylaxis was 4.5 (95% CI: 3.2−6.4) and for rFVIIa on demand, 20.4 [95% CI: 14.4−29.1] (Figure 1). There was a 78, 88 and 79% reduction in all treated bleeds and in spontaneous and joint bleeds, respectively, with concizumab prophylaxis compared with on-demand treatment (Figure 1). Concizumab concentration varied considerably between patients on the same dose level. Increasing concizumab dose was associated with lower free TFPI and normalized TG potential (Figure 2). No deaths, thromboembolic events or AE-related withdrawals occurred. No safety concerns with concomitant use of concizumab and rFVIIa were identified. Three patients had positive (very-low to medium-titer) ADA tests (titer range: 1 to 128), but with no apparent clinical effect. As expected, elevated prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimers were observed across all concizumab dose levels, reflecting the hemostatic effect of concizumab. Conclusions In the phase 2 explorer4 trial, concizumab was efficacious and safe as a subcutaneous prophylactic treatment in HAwI patients, as well as in HBwI patients for whom there is currently no prophylactic regimen available. There was no difference in safety and efficacy across hemophilia subtypes, including with the concomitant use of concizumab and the bypassing agent rFVIIa. The phase 2 trial results, which include the explorer5 trial in HA without inhibitors, support further development of concizumab as a prophylactic treatment for all hemophilia patients and have guided selection of the phase 3 dosing regimen. Disclosures Shapiro: Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Novo Nordisk Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; OPKO: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Octapharma: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Prometic Life Sciences: Consultancy; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company, Research Funding; Bayer: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Kedrion Biopharma: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Agios: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Prometic Bio Therapeutics: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; BioMarin: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Glover Blood Therapeutics: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Novartis: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; Pfizer: Other: Clinical Research Protocol with the company; American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Castaman:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Werfen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda (SHIRE): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cepo:Novo Nordisk A/S: Employment. Hvitfeldt Poulsen:Novo Nordisk: Other: Clinical trials - investigator, Funding meetings and congresses; Bayer Health Care: Other: Clinical trials - investigator, Funding meetings and congresses; Pfizer: Other: Funding meetings and congresses; Sobi: Other: Funding meetings and congresses. Hollensen:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Matsushita:Bioverative: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; KM biologists: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Consultancy, Honoraria; uniQure: Consultancy, Honoraria. Young:Bioverativ/Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Freeline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kedrion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; Spark: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Uniqure: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zupancic-Salek:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jimenez-Yuste:Bayer, CSL Behring, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sobi, Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: reimbursement for attending symposia/congresses , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Study of the Response and Safety of P-Bcma-101 CAR-T Cells in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (r/r) Multiple Myeloma (MM) (PRIME)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129562 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3184-3184 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Caitlin L. Costello ◽

Tara K. Gregory ◽

Syed Abbas Ali ◽

Jesus G. Berdeja ◽

Krina K. Patel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T ◽

Equity Ownership

P-BCMA-101 is a novel chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell product targeting B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA). P-BCMA-101 is produced using the piggyBac® (PB) DNA Modification System instead of the viral vector that is used with most CAR-T cells, requiring only plasmid DNA and mRNA. This makes it less costly and produces cells with a high percentage of the favorable T stem cell memory phenotype (TSCM). The higher cargo capacity of PB permits the incorporation of multiple genes in addition to CAR(s), including a safety switch allowing for rapid CAR-T cell elimination with a small molecule drug infusion in patients if desired, and a selection gene allowing for enrichment of CAR+ cells. Rather than using a traditional antibody-based binder, P-BCMA-101 has a Centyrin™ fused to a CD3ζ/4-1BB signaling domain. Centyrins are fully human proteins with high specificity and a large range of binding affinities, but are smaller, more stable and potentially less immunogenic than traditional scFv. Cumulatively, these features are predicted to result in a greater therapeutic index. A Phase 1, 3+3 dose escalation from 0.75 to 15 x 106 P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells/kg (RP2D 6-15 x 106 cells/kg) was conducted in patients with r/r MM (Blood 2018 132:1012) demonstrating excellent efficacy and safety of P-BCMA-101, including notably low rates and grades of CRS and neurotoxicity (maximum Grade 2 without necessitating ICU admission, safety switch activation or other aggressive measures). These results supported FDA RMAT designation and initiation of a pivotal Phase 2 study. A Phase 2 pivotal portion of this study has recently been designed and initiated (PRIME; NCT03288493) in r/r MM patients who have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy. Their therapy must have contained a proteasome inhibitor, an IMiD, and CD38 targeted therapy with at least 2 of the prior lines in the form of triplet combinations. They must also have undergone ≥2 cycles of each line unless PD was the best response, refractory to the most recent line of therapy, and undergone autologous stem cell transplant or not be a candidate. Patients are required to be >=18 years old, have measurable disease by International Myeloma Working Group criteria (IMWG; Kumar 2016), adequate vital organ function and lack significant autoimmune, CNS and infectious diseases. No pre-specified level of BCMA expression is required, as this has not been demonstrated to correlate with clinical outcomes for P-BCMA-101 and other BCMA-targeted CAR-T products. Interestingly, unlike most CAR-T products patients may receive P-BCMA-101 after prior CAR-T cells or BCMA targeted agents, and may be multiply infused with P-BCMA-101. Patients are apheresed to harvest T cells, P-BCMA-101 is then manufactured and administered to patients as a single intravenous (IV) dose (6-15 x 106 P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells/kg) after a standard 3-day cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) / fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) conditioning regimen. One hundred patients are planned to be treated with P-BCMA-101. Uniquely, given the safety profile demonstrated during Phase 1, no hospital admission is required and patients may be administered P-BCMA-101 in an outpatient setting. The primary endpoints are safety and response rate by IMWG criteria. With a 100-subject sample, the Phase 2 part of the trial will have 90% power to detect a 15-percentage point improvement over a 30% response rate (based on that of the recently approved anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab), using an exact test for a binomial proportion with a 1-sided 0.05 significance level. Multiple biomarkers are being assessed including BCMA and cytokine levels, CAR-T cell kinetics, immunogenicity, T cell receptor diversity, CAR-T cell and patient gene expression (e.g. Nanostring) and others. Overall, the PRIME study is the first pivotal study of the unique P-BCMA-101 CAR-T product, and utilizes a number of novel design features. Studies are being initiated in combination with approved therapeutics and earlier lines of therapy with the intent of conducting Phase 3 trials. Funding by Poseida Therapeutics and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). Disclosures Costello: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gregory:Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Ali:Celgene: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding. Berdeja:Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding. Patel:Oncopeptides, Nektar, Precision Biosciences, BMS: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Cellectis, Abbvie: Research Funding. Shah:University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ostertag:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Martin:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ghoddusi:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shedlock:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Spear:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Orlowski:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Cohen:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Combination Treatment of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib and Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Initial Results from a Multicenter Phase 1/2b Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.377.377 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 377-377 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ajai Chari ◽

Saurabh Chhabra ◽

Saad Usmani ◽

Sarah Larson ◽

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Recent advances have improved outcomes for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM); however, novel agents targeting different pathways are still needed. Ibrutinib (ibr) is a first-in-class, once-daily, oral, covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), an enzyme overexpressed in malignant plasma cells, whose expression may positively regulate the myeloma stem cell-like population (Yang 2015). Clinical activity was observed at the 840-mg dose of ibr in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), when combined with weekly dexamethasone (dex) (Vij 2014). Furthermore, BTK-mediated upregulation of NF-κB p65 contributes to proteasome inhibitor (PI) resistance in MM cell lines; thus, BTK inhibition with ibr may help overcome PI resistance (Murray 2015). In vitro, ibr has demonstrated synergy with PIs in MM (Rushworth 2013) and mantle cell lymphoma cells (Ou 2013). PCYC-1119 (NCT01962792) is an ongoing phase 1/2b study of ibr + carfilzomib (CFZ) ± dex in RRMM. Methods: Eligible pts received ≥2 prior therapies, including bortezomib (BTZ) and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and had either no response or documented disease progression following the most recent treatment. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design, followed by expansion of 2 cohorts (Table). Phase 1 primary objectives were maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) determination and safety. Results: As of July 8, 2015, 40 pts were enrolled and received ibr combined with CFZ ± dex across multiple dose levels during the phase 1 portion. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and cohorts 2b and 3b were chosen for expansion to further evaluate safety and efficacy. Pts had a median age of 63 y (range, 44-83) and a median time from diagnosis of 4.3 y (range, 0.5-25.3). Cytogenetic assessment by FISH identified that 20% and 8% of pts had t4;14 and del17p, respectively. Overall, pts received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 2-11), including 10% prior CFZ, 25% pomalidomide, 25% thalidomide, 73% autologous stem cell transplant, and 100% BTZ and lenalidomide. Moreover, 88% of pts were refractory to their last therapy, with 73% refractory to BTZ, 73% refractory to lenalidomide, and 58% refractory both to IMiD and PI. No relevant differences were observed across cohorts. Thirty-six pts were evaluable for efficacy. With early follow-up, the initial objective response rate (ORR) was 58% and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 67%. In cohort 3b, the ORR and CBR were 65% and 77%, respectively, including 3 very good partial responses (VGPRs) and 1 stringent complete response (sCR). No clinically meaningful tolerability differences were seen between cohorts, and no new safety findings were observed. Across all cohorts, the most common all-grade nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (43%), cough (35%), constipation and fatigue (30% each), and nausea (28%). Grade ≥3 hematologic AEs included thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (13%), and neutropenia (5%). Grade ≥3 nonhematologic AEs occurring in ≥10% of pts were pneumonia and hypertension (15% each), diarrhea (13%), and fatigue (10%). Eleven pts reported treatment related SAEs. No clinically relevant differences in AEs were observed across cohorts. Ten pts discontinued study treatment due to progressive disease; an additional 6 pts discontinued due to an AE, and 6 pts discontinued due to investigator or pt decision. Duration of treatment ranged from 0.3 to 13.6 months, and 17 pts remain on treatment. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: The initial phase 1 data indicated promising clinical potential for ibr + CFZ + dex, as it is well tolerated with no DLTs, no new toxicities, and no increase in the severity of known toxicities for the individual agents. The preliminary ORR of 58%, with 1 sCR and 3 VGPRs in cohort 3b, is encouraging in this mostly refractory patient population, especially with the high number refractory to BTZ. Cohort 3b was established as the RP2D and will be further evaluated in the phase 2 portion of the study. Table. Dosing Cohorts Cohort ibr* mg/qd CFZ† mg/m2 dex‡ mg 1(n=3) 560 20/27 - 2a(n=5) 560 20/36 - 2b(n=14) 560 20/36 20 3b(n=18) 840 20/36 20 *Starts on Day (D) 8 of Cycle (C) 1; continuous thereafter. †D1-2, 8-9, 15-16 through C12; thereafter D1-2, 15-16. ‡D1-2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23; 10 mg for pts age ≥75 y; 4 mg prior to CFZ during C1 only (cohorts 1 and 2a) with re-initiation as needed. Disclosures Chari: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ibrutinib in relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Usmani:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Larson:BMS: Consultancy. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Matous:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Holkova:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lunning:TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Valent:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Kwei:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chang:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Graef:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Bilotti:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. McDonagh:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding.

Download Full-text