scholarly journals The Combination of Frailty and ISS Scores Identifies a Simple Prognostic Index for Overall Survival in Elderly Patients Treated with Novel Agents-Based Induction Therapy

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4740-4740
Author(s):  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Massimo Offidani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
International Staging System ◽  
Frailty Score

Abstract Background: Several biological parameters define patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at high-risk of progression or death. The well-known International Staging System (ISS), as well as age per se, are insufficient to explain differences of overall survival (OS) in patients over 65 years, who are 2/3 of newly diagnosed (ND) MM patients. We have recently showed that a frailty score combining age, functional status (Activity of Daily Living and Instrumental Activity of Daily living scores) and comorbidities (Charlson index) defines 3 categories of patients - fit, intermediate-fitness, frail - with significantly differences in OS and progression-free survival (Larocca A, et al. Blood 2013 122:687). Here we assess the causes of the different mortality in intermediate-fitness and frail groups compared to fit ones and present a final prognostic score based on the combination of ISS and frailty scores. Methods: NDMM patients over 65 years enrolled in 3 clinical trials, receiving either lenalidomide, bortezomib or carfilzomib were included in the analysis. Details on treatment regimens and results of these studies have previously been reported (Palumbo A, et al. Blood 2013 122:536; Larocca A, et al. Blood 2013 122:539, Bringhen S et al. Blood 2014 Jul 3;124(1):63-9). The cumulative incidences of discontinuation and toxicities were calculated using the Fine & Gray model. The frailty score was combined with ISS with the CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method used as an iterative decision tree. Results: 869 patients (median age 74 years) were included in the analysis; 260 (30%) were frail, 269 (31%) intermediated-fitness and 340 (39%) fit. The 3-year OS was 57% in frail, 76% in intermediated-fitness and 84% in fit patients. Overall, 143 patients (16%) died, 70 (27%) frail, 39 (14%) intermediate-fitness and 34 (10%) fit. The causes of death were: disease progression [35 (13%) in frail, 22 (8%) in intermediate-fitness and 18 (5%) in fit patients] and toxicity [21 (8%), 10 (4%) and 11 (3%), respectively]. The higher risk of death for progression was related with the lower dose-intensity due to the higher rate of drug discontinuation and/or dose reduction. The average dose intensity was lower in frail (74%, p=0.0006) and intermediate-fitness patients (80%, p=0.07) compared with fit patients (85%). The cumulative incidence of drug discontinuation for any cause, excluding progression and death, was higher in frail (25%; HR 2.21, p<0.001) and intermediate-fitness (22%; HR: 1.41, p=0.052) patients compared with fit ones (17%). The most frequent reasons for toxicity-related death were cardiac events [11 (4%) in frail patients, 2 (1%) in intermediate-fitness, 3 (1%) in fit] and infections [8 (3%), 2 (1%) and 2 (1%), respectively]. When we combined the frailty score with the ISS, 6 groups of patients and 4 risk categories were identified: fit patients with ISS I at low risk (15%; 3-year OS: 94%), fit patients with ISS stage II or III and intermediate-fitness patients with ISS I, II or III at intermediate risk (55%; 3-year OS: 75-77%.), frail patients with ISS stage I or II at high risk (19%; 3-year OS: 61%) and frail patients with ISS stage III at very-high risk (11%, 3-year OS: 55%) (Figure 1). Conclusion: The inferior survival observed among intermediate-fitness and in frail patients as compared to fit ones, is related to a higher rate of toxic deaths and disease progression, due to a lower dose intensity. The combination of the frailty score, evaluating the patient's status, and the standard ISS, taking into account the biological characteristics of the disease, can predict survival and enhances the single predictive values of the scores, thus representing a valuable tool for treatment-decision in the clinical practice. Figure 1. Overall survival of patients classified into 6 categories according to the recursive partitioning analysis by combining the frailty score and the International Staging System. Figure 1. Overall survival of patients classified into 6 categories according to the recursive partitioning analysis by combining the frailty score and the International Staging System. Disclosures Larocca: Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use off-label of lenalidomide (immunomodulatory drug), carfilzomib (proteasome inhibitor), subcutaneous bortezomib (proteasome inhibitor) in terms of schedule used and combination.. Bringhen:Onyx: Consultancy; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen and Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Hajek:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Offidani:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Maracci:Mundipharma: Honoraria. Gay:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marasca:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Giuliani:Celgene: Research Funding. Musto:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Combining Information Regarding Chromosomal Aberrations t(4;14), Del(17p13) and the Copy Number of 1q21 with the International Staging System Classification Allows Stratification of Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results From the HOVON-65/GMMG HD4 Trial

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 332-332
Author(s):  
Kai Neben ◽  
Henk M. Lokhorst ◽  
Anna Jauch ◽  
Uta Bertsch ◽  
Thomas Hielscher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
International Staging System

Abstract Abstract 332 PURPOSE : In Multiple Myeloma (MM), the combination of serum beta-2-microglobulin level with serum albumin concentration has been proposed as an outcome predictor in the International Staging System (ISS). More recently, subgroups of MM defined by genetic and cytogenetic abnormalities have been associated with unique biologic, clinical, and prognostic features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic value of 12 chromosomal abnormalities by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in a series of 354 MM patients treated within the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial. Patients with newly diagnosed MM were randomized to receive either three cycles of VAD (arm A; vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone) or PAD (arm B; bortezomib, adriamycin, dexamethasone). All patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by maintenance therapy with thalidomide 50 mg daily (arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks (arm B), respectively. In addition, a second cohort of patients was analyzed as a control group (n=462), undergoing ASCT at the University of Heidelberg between September 1994 and December 2010. RESULTS: For the entire group of patients treated within the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial, we identified 233 patients with 2 copies (67.7%), 95 patients with 3 copies (27.6%) and 16 patients (4.7%) with more than three copies of the chromosomal region 1q21. In addition to del(17p13) and t(4;14), we added +1q21 (>3 copies) to the group of high-risk aberrations, since the outcome of these patients was almost as poor as it was observed for patients with del(17p13). Subsequently, we analyzed whether combining the ISS score with information on the presence of high-risk aberrations could improve the prognostic value with regard to patients' outcome. A combination of the presence or absence of del(17p13), t(4;14), or +1q21 (>3 copies) with the ISS score allowed patients to be stratified into three distinct groups: low-risk [absence of del(17p13)/t(4;14)/+1q21 (>3 copies) and ISS I], high-risk [presence of del(17p13)/t(4;14)/+1q21 (>3 copies) and ISS II/III], and intermediate-risk (all remaining patients). Most of the patients belonged to the low- (33%) and intermediate-risk (49%) groups, whereas 18% were allocated to the high-risk group. The median PFS times for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 41.9 months, 31.1 months (HR=1.7; p=0.0018) and 18.7 months (HR=3.6; p<0.0001), respectively. The 3yr-overall survival (OS) decreased from 94% in the low-risk group to 80% (HR=4.6; p=0.0001) and 43% (HR=12.8; p<0.0001) in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. These results were confirmed in the independent cohort of patients: From date of first ASCT, the median PFS times for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 43.3 months, 23.0 months (HR=1.5; p=0.015) and 13.8 months (HR=2.4; p=0.0003), respectively. The 4yr-OS decreased from 84% in the low-risk group to 71% (HR=2.1; p=0.0043) and 49% (HR=3.84; p<0.0001) in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our series, the ISS/FISH-based score/algorithm predicted PFS and OS much better than the ISS alone. Our results with molecular cytogenetic techniques may already have implications for the risk-adapted clinical management of patients with MM particularly in younger patients. Disclosures: van de Velde: Ortho Biotech Oncology Research & Development: Employment. Sonneveld:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Overall Survival and Subgroup Analysis from a Randomized Phase III Study of Intravenous Rigosertib Versus Best Supportive Care (BSC) in Patients (pts) with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (HR-MDS) after Failure of Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 163-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
Maria R. Baer ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background: No approved treatment options are available to HR-MDS pts after HMA therapy. Study 04-21 (“ONTIME” trial) was a Phase III, randomized, controlled study of the efficacy and safety of rigosertib, a novel small molecule inhibitor of PI3-kinase and PLK pathways, in a heterogeneous population of MDS pts who had relapsed after, failed to respond to, or progressed during administration of HMAs. The study was conducted at 87 sites in the United States and 5 European countries. Methods:From Dec 2010 to Aug 2013, 299 HR-MDS pts [<30% bone marrow blasts (BMBL)] who had progressed on (37% of total enrollment), failed to respond to (25%), or relapsed after (38%) HMA treatment were stratified on BMBL count and randomized 2:1 to receive rigosertib (199 pts) or BSC (100 pts). Rigosertib was administered at 1800 mg/24 hr for 72-hr as a continuous intravenous (CIV) ambulatory infusion, every 2 weeks for the first 16 weeks, and then every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), analyzed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis using the Kaplan-Meier method stratified on BMBL (5% to 19% vs. 20% to 30%). The trial had a 95% power to detect a 13-wk increase in median OS from 17 wks on BSC, with a 2-sided alpha = 0.05. The following results are based on 242 deaths: 161 in the rigosertib arm and 81 in the BSC arm. Results : Overall, the 2 arms were balanced in terms of baseline characteristics, with the majority of pts being male (66%), and White (82%). Age ranged from 50-90 yrs in the rigosertib arm and 55-86 years in the BSC arm (median, 74 yrs). The majority of pts (85%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1. The median duration of the last HMA therapy was 8.8 months (mo) in the rigosertib arm and 10.3 mo in the BSC arm; 127 (64%) of rigosertib pts and 57% of BSC pts were classified as “primary HMA failure” (ie, they failed to respond to or progressed during HMA therapy, as defined by Prebet et al, J Clin Oncol, 2011). A 2.3-mo improvement in median OS was found in the overall (ITT) population (8.2 mo rigosertib vs. 5.9 mo BSC) (Figure 1). The ITT survival for rigosertib was similar to that noted in Phase I/II studies (35 weeks). The stratified log-rank p-value was 0.33. The stratified hazard ratio was 0.87, which was quite different from the ratio of medians (5.9/8.2 = 0.72), due to the fact that the 2 survival curves converged at 15 mo. Notably, among the 184 patients with primary HMA failure, the median OS was 8.6 mo in the rigosertib arm (N = 127) vs. 5.3 mo in the BSC arm (N = 57), HR= 0.69, p= 0.040 (Figure 2). Multivariate Cox regression, adjusting for pretreatment prognostic factors, showed little change in the treatment effect. The following subgroups were correlated with better OS: pts with failure of/progression on HMA treatment, pts with duration of HMA treatment ≤ 9 mo, pts < 75 years of age, and pts with very high risk per IPSS-R (Figure 3). Rigosertib was well tolerated, with a median dose intensity of 92%. There were no significant compliance or operations issues related to ambulatory continuous infusion. Protocol-defined dose reductions were reported in 5% of pts, with 24% experiencing dose delays of >7 days, mostly due to unrelated adverse events (AEs). No obvious differences between rigosertib and BSC were found in the incidence of AEs (rigosertib, 99%; BSC, 85%) or of ≥ Grade 3 AEs (rigosertib, 79%; BSC, 68%). In the rigosertib arm, AEs reported by ≥ 20% of pts, irrespective of severity or causality, were nausea (35%), diarrhea (33%), constipation (31%), fatigue (30%), fever (27%), anemia (22%), and peripheral edema (21%). Rigosertib had low myelotoxicity, consistent with previous clinical experience. Conclusions:Although the primary endpoint in this Phase III study of rigosertib vs BSC in pts with HR-MDS did not reach statistical significance in the ITT population, encouraging rigosertib treatment-related improvement in OS was noted in several subgroups of MDS pts, including those with “primary HMA failure and in patients in the IPSS-R Very High Risk category. CIV therapy with rigosertib had a favorable safety profile in this orphan population of elderly pts with MDS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Fenaux: Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roboz:Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Teva Oncology: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy. Wilhelm:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wilhelm:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Azarnia:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Maniar:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRD) Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma; The Mayo Clinic Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2147-2147
Author(s):  
M Hasib Sidiqi ◽  
Mohammed A Aljama ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Eli Muchtar ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract We retrospectively reviewed all patients receiving bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) within 12 months of diagnosis for multiple myeloma at the Mayo Clinic. 243 patients treated between January 2010 and April of 2017 were included in the study. Median age was 61 (interquartile range, 55-67) with 62% of patients being male. High risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) were present in 34% of patients. 166 (68%) patients received some form of maintenance/other therapy post transplant (no maintenance (NM, n=77), lenalidomide maintenance (LM, n=108), bortezomib maintenance (BM, n=39) and other therapy (OT, n=19)). Overall response rate was 99% with complete response (CR) rate of 42% and 62% at day 100 and time of best response post transplant respectively. The four cohorts categorized by post transplant therapy were well matched for age, gender and ISS stage. HRA were more common amongst patients receiving bortezomib maintenance or other therapy post transplant (NM 18% vs LM 22% vs BM 68% vs OT 79%, p<0.0001). Two year and five year overall survival rates were 90% and 67% respectively with an estimated median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of 96 months and 28 months respectively for the whole cohort. OS was not significantly different when stratified by post-transplant therapy (Median OS 96 months for NM vs not reached for LM vs 62 months for BM vs not reached for OT, p=0.61), however post-transplant therapy was predictive of PFS (median PFS 23 months for NM vs 34 months for LM vs 28 months for BM vs 76 months for OT, p=0.01). High risk cytogenetics was associated with a worse OS but not PFS when compared to patients with standard risk (median OS: not reached for standard risk vs 60 months for HRA, p=0.0006; median PFS: 27 months for standard risk vs 22 months for HRA, p=0.70). In patients that did not receive maintenance therapy presence of HRA was a strong predictor of OS and PFS (median OS: not reached for standard risk vs 36 months for HRA, p<0.0001; median PFS: 24 months for standard risk vs 7 months for HRA, p<0.0001). Patients receiving maintenance therapy appeared to have a similar PFS and OS irrespective of cytogenetics (median OS: not reached for standard risk vs 62 months for HRA, p=0.14; median PFS: 35 months for standard risk vs 34 months for HRA, p=0.79).On multivariable analysis ISS stage III and achieving CR/stringent CR predicted PFS whilst the only independent predictors of OS were presence of HRA and achieving CR/stringent CR. The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by ASCT is a highly effective regimen producing deep and durable responses in many patients. Maintenance therapy in this cohort may overcome the poor prognostic impact of high risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Table Table. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gertz:Abbvie: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; Teva: Consultancy; Alnylam: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Utilizing Organ-Sparing Marrow Irradiation to Condition Patients Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant with High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies: Results of a Pilot Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2856-2856
Author(s):  
Sumithira Vasu ◽  
Meghan Kromer ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Hannah Choe ◽  
Karilyn Larkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Background: Total body irradiation (TBI) has long been incorporated as part of the conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). While the myeloablative TBI conditioning is associated with a lower relapse rate in high risk diseases such as Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), it is also associated with substantial toxicities, and increased NRM so use of this regimen is limited to young patients with excellent performance status. In this study, we used a linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique to deliver standard myeloablative radiation to high risk body sites while sparing radiation sensitive organs (Organ Sparing Marrow Targeted Irradiation, OSMI). We hypothesized that this technique would be feasible and safe in patients who are older or who have higher transplant specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI), typically ineligible for standard TBI conditioning. Methods: This is a single-arm prospective study. Patients from age 18-75 with high risk AML, MDS or ALL were eligible. There are 3 cohorts: (1) age 18-50 with HCT-CI of 3/4; (2) age 51-65 with HCT-CI of ≤ 3; and (3) age 66-75 with HCT-CI of ≤ 2. Patients receive OSMI to a total dose of 1200 cGy delivered twice daily for 6 fractions for a total of 7200 cGy. Clinical tumor volume includes total skeletal bone marrow and any sanctuary or high-risk areas. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis originally was tacrolimus and methotrexate. Given high incidence of bacterial infections related to mucositis, prophylaxis was changed to tacrolimus and sirolimus without methotrexate. All patients received Keratinocyte growth factor for prevention of mucositis. The primary objective was to assess feasibility and tolerability of OSMI based HSCT as defined by transplant-related mortality (TRM) at day 30 (D30) as well as rate of grade II/III organ toxicity (defined by Bearman Regimen-Related Toxicities Scale) attributable to conditioning occurring within 30 days. Results: Patient demographics for the 24 patients are shown in Table 1. Median age of recipients was 56.5 years. No graft failures were observed. The most common grade II or III Bearman toxicities include mucositis (grade 2: n=4), and diarrhea (grade 2: n=4). Clinical outcomes are shown in Figure 2. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) at 2 years was 78% and 74% respectively. Among the 5 patients who were not in complete remission at the time of transplant, 2-year OS and RFS rate was 40%. Incidence of Grades II-IV acute GVHD was 79% and Grades III-IV GVHD was 30%. Relapse incidence was 4% at 2 years. Incidence of Thrombotic microangiopathy by day 100 (TMA) as defined by Jodele's criteria was 17%. Incidence of chronic GVHD was 45% and severe chronic GVHD was 16%. One year non-relapse mortality was 22%, likely due to higher incidence of GVHD. Conclusions: Selected patients who are older or with higher HCT-CI, who are typically not candidates for standard TBI conditioning, were able to receive a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning regimen with 2 year overall survival rates of 78%. We observed a high incidence of TMA, possibly related to use of tacrolimus and sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis, and a high incidence of Grade II-IV acute GVHD. Low incidence of relapse was observed. OSMI-based conditioning was feasible in this cohort with median age of 56 years and was associated with low rates of relapse and favorable 2 year overall survival. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Vasu: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy. Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding.

Trial in Progress: A Phase I Trial of BTX-A51 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML or High-Risk MDS

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Brian J. Ball ◽  
Anthony S. Stein ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Crystal Murray ◽  
Karin Kook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase

Background: For patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), low response rates and poor overall survival remain unmet clinical needs. AML cells evade apoptosis through overexpression of antiapoptotic genes and inactivation of p53. The antiapoptotic gene Mcl1 is overexpressed in AML cell lines resistant to venetoclax. Similarly, the sensitivity of AML patients' samples to venetoclax inversely correlates with the presence of a TP53 mutation or low expression of p53. In AML, p53 inactivation more commonly results from overexpression of its negative regulators, Mdmx and Mdm2. BTX-A51 is a novel, oral, direct inhibitor of Casein kinase 1α (CK1α), cyclin dependent kinase 7 (CDK7), and CDK9. CK1α phosphorylates Mdmx and Mdm2 leading to enhanced binding and degradation of p53. CDK7 and CDK9 phosphorylate RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to enable transcriptional initiation and elongation, particularly at large clusters of transcriptional enhancers termed super-enhancers (SE). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that BTX-A51 robustly increased p53 protein levels via CK1a inhibition and Mdm2 downregulation while preferentially decreasing SE transcription of key oncogenes such as Myc andMcl1, enabling selective apoptosis of leukemia cells. The combination of CK1α, CDK7, and CDK9 inhibition was synergistic and prolonged survival in multiple genetic and patient-derived xenograft AML models. Study Design and Methods: This is an open-label, multi-center, first-in-human Phase 1 study evaluating the safety of BTX-A51 in patients with R/R AML or high-risk MDS. The trial will be performed in two phases, a dose escalation (phase 1a) and dose expansion (phase 1b). Phase 1a utilizes a hybrid accelerated titration with single patient cohorts and a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design to assess 8 potential dosing cohorts. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be the dose for which the isotonic estimate of the toxicity rate is closest to the target toxicity rate of 0.3. Up to a maximum of 35 patients will be enrolled in the dose escalation phase of the study at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and City of Hope Cancer Center. Following determination of the MTD, 15 patients will be enrolled in the dose expansion phase for further evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and for preliminary evidence of efficacy. BTX-A51 will be dosed 3 weeks on drug, followed by 1 week off drug over a 28-day cycle. For the first cycle, patients will receive tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis with allopurinol and intravenous fluids and be closely monitored. Key inclusion criteria are age ³ 18 years, R/R AML or R/R high-risk MDS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) £ 2 and life expectancy of ³ 6 weeks, and adequate kidney and liver function. Key exclusion criteria are receipt of cancer chemotherapy (other than hydroxyurea) within 2 weeks prior to the start of study drug, transplantation within 3 months prior to screening, active graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic immunosuppressive medications, and a white blood cell count &gt; 20 × 109/L. The primary objective for the Phase 1 study is to determine the MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BTX-A51. Secondary objectives include evaluating overall response (complete remission, complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, and partial remission) according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 criteria (Döhner et al. Blood. 2017), survival (overall survival and event-free survival) and pharmacokinetics. Correlative objectives include determining the changes in SEs and SE-driven expression of antiapoptotic genes by chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA-sequencing. Recruitment is ongoing and this trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04243785 Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Borthakur:BioLine Rx: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; FTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; BioTherix: Consultancy; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BioLine Rx: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Nkarta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy. Murray:Salamandra: Current Employment. Kook:Salamandra: Current Employment. Chan:BioTheryx: Current Employment. Stein:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Biotheryx: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Phase II Study with R-FND Followed by 90-Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Radioimmunotherapy and Rituximab Maintenance for Untreated High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Nathan H. Fowler ◽  
Sattva S. Neelapu ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Maria A. Rodriguez ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Ibritumomab Tiuxetan ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance

Abstract Abstract 99 Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients (pts) with high-risk features using the FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) have an expected 5-year survival of approximately 50% with conventional chemotherapy. The incorporation of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy has improved results in this poor risk subgroup. (Buske, Blood 2006;108:1504) We have previously demonstrated that R-FND (rituximab, fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone) is an effective regimen for indolent lymphoma, capable of inducing molecular remissions. (McLaughlin, ASCO 2003;102:564). Both extended dosing of rituximab following induction, and consolidation of first remission with 90-Y ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmnotherapy (RIT) can improve complete response rates and progression free survival (PFS) rates for patients with advanced FL. (Morschhauser, JCO 2008;32:5156; Salles, Lancet 2011;377:42) This is the first report of a chemoimmunotherapy approach followed by both RIT consolidation and rituximab maintenance. Methods: Untreated patients with FL (grade 1–3), with high risk disease (FLIPI score ≥ 3) who had adequate hematologic function and extensive stage (III/IV) disease were eligible for study entry. Patients received rituximab (375mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of cycle 1, and day 1 of subsequent cycles) fludarabine (25mg/m2 days 1–3), mitoxantrone (10mg/m2 day 1), and dexamethasone (20mg days 1–5) for four 28 day cycles. RIT was given 12–16 weeks following R-FND pending hematologic recovery. Six weeks following RIT, patients received rituximab 375mg/m2 every two months for one year. The primary objective of the study was to determine the PFS rates based on 1999 International Working Group criteria. The secondary objectives included assessing the safety and tolerance of RIT and maintenance rituximab after R-FND, assessing the CR and overall response rates, and determining the overall survival following treatment. Results: Forty nine patients were enrolled and 47 received treatment between October 2004 and April 2009. Forty-six patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The median age was 61 (37–78), 80% had bone marrow involvement, and all had stage III/IV disease. Twenty four (51%) patients had bulky disease (>5cm) and 42 (91%) had elevated β2M. Thirty six patients completed all planned courses of treatment. Eight patients did not receive RIT, two due to neutropenia after R-FND. One patient had progressive disease while on treatment. Following R-FND, the complete (CR + CRu) and partial response rates were 87% and 13%. With RIT consolidation, the CR rate increased to 91%. At a median follow up of 50 months, the projected five year overall survival and PFS rates were 93% and 74%. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 57% and 35% of patients respectively. Thirty seven patients required growth factors and 17 patients required transfusions. The median time to hematologic recovery following RIT was 10 weeks. The most common non-hematologic adverse events (≥Gr 3) were fatigue (17%), dypsnea (13%), and myalgia (11%). There were 3 cases of myelodysplasia (MDS), one in a patient who did not receive RIT. Conclusions: The combination of R-FND followed by RIT intensification and rituximab maintenance results in OS and PFS outcomes that are better than traditional combinations in this high risk population. Given the potential for serious toxicity (eg. MDS) seen in this trial and other intensive treatment strategies, this approach may be most appropriate in high-risk FLIPI patients whose outlook with standard therapy is poor. Acknowledgments: This study was sponsored by Genentech and Spectrum. Disclosures: Fowler: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Younes:Genentech, SBIO, Seattle Genetics, Syndax, Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Impact of Hypomethylating Agent Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Chromosome 3 Abnormalities

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1705-1705
Author(s):  
David Sallman ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Amy E. DeZern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chromosome 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Monosomy 3 ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), abnormalities of chromosome 3 (i.e. inversion 3 (inv(3)), translocation 3q (t(3q)), or deletion 3q (del(3q)) represent a poor-risk karyotype in the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with 3q abnormalities, patients with inv(3)/t3;3 represented the most unfavorable group with a median overall survival (OS) of 10.3 months (Lugthart et al., 2010). We previously presented a single institution experience regarding outcomes of MDS patients with chromosome 3 abnormalities. Here, we sought to further define outcomes of chromosome 3 abnormalities in MDS and address the impact of hypomethylating agents (HMA) on outcome in multiple institutions. Patients and Methods Patients were identified through the MDS Clinical Research Consortium and were included if they had a WHO diagnosis of MDS, MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), therapy related MDS (t-MDS), or AML (20-30% myeloblasts) and had any karyotypic abnormality involving chromosome 3. Data analyzed included baseline demographics, disease characteristics, IPSS/IPSS-R scores, treatment and outcome. Responses to HMA therapy were evaluated using International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for overall survival. Results A total of 413 patients were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. WHO classification was as follows: 9% RA/RARS, 12% RCMD, 26% RAEB-1, 31% RAEB-2, 2% MDS/MPN, 7% MDS Unclassified, 13% AML; 34% had t-MDS. Overall, 97% of patients were higher risk by IPSS-R (i.e., intermediate to very high risk) with a median blast % in bone marrow of 8%. Distribution of cytogenetic abnormalities were inv(3) (10%), del(3q) (12%), t(3q) (18%), monosomy 3 (22%), 3p abnormalities (22%), and other chromosome 3 changes (17%). Median OS for the cohort was 12.0 months (95% C.I. 10.8 to 13.9 months) and 31% of patients without AML transformed to AML. IPSS-R was predictive of median OS across subgroups (P < 0.00001). The specific cytogenetic abnormality was predictive for survival (P < 0.00001) with median OS for t(3q) 19 months, inv(3) 13 months, del(3q) 13 months, 3p 10 months, monosomy 3 9 months, and other 3 abnormalities 11 months. There was no survival difference between patients with translocations of 3q21 versus 3q26 (median OS 18 months versus 18.6 months, P = 0.96). Patients with an isolated chromosome 3 abnormality had significantly improved OS (25.1 months versus 10.9 months (P < 0.00001). Complex karyotype (>/= 3 abnormalities) was observed in 74% of patients and was associated with decreased OS (11 months versus 21 months, P < 0.00001). Of patients who received HMA therapy (48%), the overall response rate was 46% (17% hematological improvement (HI), 7% PR, 20% CR, 2% marrow CR (CRm) with stable disease in 23%). Median OS with and without HMA was 15.5 months versus 8.4 months (p=0.038). In int-2/high risk patients by IPSS, HMA treated patient had a median OS of 14.0 months versus 7.6 months for patients not treated with HMAs (P = 0.005) with no benefit for HMAs in lower-risk patients (median OS 24.5 months with HMA versus 38.7 months without; P =0.41). Cox regression modeling with HMA therapy, IPSS and clinical site confirmed the HMA OS benefit in higher-risk patients (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; P = 0.005), but showed decreased OS in lower-risk patients (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.03-3.92; P = 0.04). Allogeneic transplantation was performed in 18% (n=75) of patients, with median OS of 18 months versus 10 months in non-transplanted patients (P < 0.00001). Conclusion In this large cohort of patients with MDS and oligoblastic AML associated with chromosome 3 abnormalities, survival was heterogeneous but overall poor, with isolated chromosome 3 abnormality and t(3q) patients having a more favorable OS than patients with other chromosome 3 anomalies. MDS patients with 3p changes have poor outcomes. Although some patients with chromosome 3 respond to HMA therapy, the overall survival remains poor and novel approaches are needed. Disclosures Sekeres: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Steensma:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Lancet:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Kalo-Bios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Komrokji:Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau.

Evaluation of the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) in an Independent Cohort of Unselected Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3045-3045
Author(s):  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
Magdalini Migkou ◽  
Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Staging System ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
International Staging System ◽  
Independent Cohort

Abstract The International Staging System (ISS), which is based on beta2-microblobulin (β2M) and serum albumin, has been widely used for the risk stratification of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, since 2003. Chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by iFISH have been also recognized as strong prognostic factors, while elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has been consistently associated with poor prognosis. In order to improve the prognostic power of ISS, IMWG has revised ISS (R-ISS) by adding high risk cytogenetics by iFISH and serum LDH: R-ISS-1 includes patients with ISS-1 (serum β2M level <3.5 mg/L and serum albumin level ≥3.5 g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)] and normal LDH levels (below the upper limit of normal (UNL)); R-ISS-3 includes patients with ISS-3 (serum β2M level >5.5 mg/L) and either high-risk CA or high LDH level; and R-ISS-2 includes all the other possible combinations. R-ISS was based on the data of 3,060 patients who had participated in clinical trials. However, it has not been validated in an independent cohort of unselected patients. Our aim was to evaluate R-ISS in consecutive, unselected patients, treated in a single center. Our study included 475 patients with available data for cytogenetics [t(4;14) and del17p by iFISH], LDH and ISS. Median age was 67 years (range 27-91); 53% were >65 years and 25% >75 years of age. Only 8.6% did not receive new drugs as primary therapy; 42% received IMiDs (19% thalidomide-based, 23% lenalidomide-based) and 49% bortezomib-based primary therapy, while 36% received ASCT. In the IMWG cohort, 65% had received ASCT, 6% no new drugs, 44% proteasome inhibitors and 66% IMiDs. Per ISS, 24% were ISS-1, 34% ISS-2 and 42% ISS-3. High risk cytogenetics (either t(4;14) or del17p) were present in 23.5% and elevated LDH in 15%. In the IMWG cohort used for the formulation of R-ISS, 38% were ISS-1, 38% ISS-2 and 24% ISS-3; thus, our patients had more often ISS-3 and less often ISS-1 disease. High risk CAs and elevated LDH were not different compared to our cohort of patients (24% and 13%, respectively). The difference in ISS disposition between the two cohorts probably reflects the unselected nature of our population, which also included patients with severe renal impairment who often are excluded from clinical trials. Per R-ISS, 85 (18%) patients had R-ISS-1, 83 (17.5%) had R-ISS-3 and 306 (64.5%) had R-ISS-2. The disposition in the original cohort was 28% for R-ISS-1, 62% for R-ISS-2 and 10% for R-ISS-3. This difference was due to the higher proportion of patients with ISS-3 disease in our cohort. The R-ISS disposition in those ≤65 years, was 21%, 60% and 19% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3; among patients 66-75 years it was 19%, 63% and 18%, and among those >75 years it was 11%, 74% and 15%, respectively (p=0.128). The median follow up was 40 months; 57% of patients progressed or died and 63% have remained alive. Median PFS was 27 months and estimated median OS was 63 months. Median PFS for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3 was 34, 28 and 17 months, respectively (p<0.001). According to R-ISS, the probability of 3-year OS was 83%, 69% and 45% and of 5-year OS 77%, 53% and 19% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3, respectively (p<0.001). In patients treated with ASCT, the probability for 5-year OS per R-ISS stage was 93%, 77% and 32%, respectively (p<0.001), while for patients not treated with HDM it was 64%, 41% and 13% (p<0.001). The probability for 5-year OS for patients treated with bortezomib was 95%, 69% and 18% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3 (p<0.001) and for those treated with IMiDs, it was 68%, 41% and 23%, respectively (p=0.002). We evaluated the performance of R-ISS in patients ≤65, 66-75 and >75 years. In patients ≤65 years, the probability for 5-year OS was 84%, 71% and 29%, for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3 (p<0.001); for patients 66-75 years, it was 73%, 43% and 18% (p=0.001), while in patients >75 years, the median OS was >5 years, 35 and 29 month, respectively (p=0.122). Thus, R-ISS identified a group of patients >75 with favorable prognosis, although there was no significant difference in the OS for R-ISS-2 vs -3, probably due to the impact of other comorbidities and performance status of the very elderly. In conclusion, our data in consecutive, unselected patients, with differences in the characteristics and treatment approaches compared to the original IMWG cohort, verified that R-ISS provides significant prognostic information and it allows the identification of three different patient groups with clearly different outcome. Disclosures Terpos: Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel expenses; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

Sustained Overall Survival Benefit with Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone Versus No Treatment in Patients with Smoldering Myeloma at High Risk of Progression to Myeloma: Long Term Analysis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3308-3308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Miguel-T Hernandez ◽  
Pilar Giraldo ◽  
Javier De La Rubia ◽  
Felipe De Arriba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: For patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), the standard of care is observation. However, high-risk patients may benefit from early intervention. Methods: In this phase 3 trial, 119 patients with high-risk SMM were randomized to treatment or observation. The high risk populationwas defined by the presence of both PC_ 10% and MC_ 3g/dl or ifonly one criterion was present, patients must have a proportionof aPC within the total PCBM compartment by immunophenotypingof 95% plus immunoparesis. Patients in the treatment group received nine 4-week induction cycles (lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg per day on days 1 to 21, plus dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg per day on days 1 to 4 and days 12 to 15), followed by maintenance (lenalidomide at a dose of 10 mg per day on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle) up to 2 years. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP) to myeloma. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rate and safety. Results: After a median follow-up of 75 months (range: 57-100), there was a 57% reduction in the risk of death for the early treatment with lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus not treatment (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.9; P=0.02). Median overall survival has not been reached in either group, but 86% and 62% of patients are alive at 6 years in the early treatment and observation arms, respectively (Figure 1). The benefit in TTP is also highly sustained (hazard ratio: 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.41; P<0.0001). Progression to MM occurred in 53 out of the 62 patients (86%) in the abstention arm while only 22 out of 57 patients (38%) in the len-dex arm. At the time of progression patients received optimized treatments: bortezomib-based combinations were administered to thirteen out of 22 patients (59%) in the len-dex arm and to 23 out of 53 patients (43%) in the observation arm; lenalidomide-based combinations to 3 out of 22 patients (14%) in the experimental and to 8 out of 53 patients (15%) in the control arm; two out of 22 patients in the len-dex arm (9%) received bortezomib plus immunomodulatory agents whilst 16 out of 53 patients (30%) in the observation group received this combination; four out of 22 patients (18%) and six out of 53 patients (11%) in the len-dex and observation groups, respectively, were treated with chemotherapy; four patients (18%) in the experimental arm and 15 (28%) in the observation groups received an ASCT. Most patients responded to rescue therapies in both arms, resulting in overall response rates of 78% (17/22) and 86% (45/53) in the experimental and control arm, respectively. We compared survival from start of subsequent therapy in the patients population who progressed to active disease; the outcome was similar in both arms: at 6 years, 62% (16/22) of the patients in the len-dex arm remain alive and 49% (31/53) in the observation arm (P=0.50; Fig. 2C). The survival benefit observed was independent of the classification model used for defining high risk SMM ( Mayo Clinic and Spanish model) Conclusion: This long term follow-up analysis confirms that early treatment with lenalidomide-dexamethasone for high-risk SMM translates into a significant benefit in TTP but also in a sustained significant prolongation of the OS. The early exposure to lenalidomide-dexamethasone does not induce more resistant relapses. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mateos: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. De La Rubia:Amgen, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy. Paiva:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; EngMab: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Binding Site: Research Funding. Oriol:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Expected Survival in Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma and Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4497-4497
Author(s):  
Moritz Binder ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Arjun Lakshman ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
General Population ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Excess Mortality ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Similar Survival

Abstract Background: The introduction of novel therapeutics has led to improved outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). MM and its precursor lesion smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) have traditionally been associated with increased mortality despite treatment. We aimed to assess the impact of a diagnosis of SMM and MM compared to the general population in the context of established prognostic factors. Methods: We studied the overall survival of 1697 patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM, n = 582) and multiple myeloma (MM, n = 1115) diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 01/2005 and 12/2015. Expected survival accounting for age and sex was calculated using the United States general population (US) as the reference group. Observed and expected overall survival was expressed as the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of observed to expected deaths. Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates were calculated and the log-rank test was used to compare overall survival in subgroups. The subgroups of interest were based on the International Staging System (ISS) and the presence of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) high-risk cytogenetics: t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and del(17p). Proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the associations between the aforementioned prognostic factors and overall survival. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The median age at diagnosis in patients with SMM and MM was 65 (32 - 92) and 63 years (24 - 90), respectively. Two hundred forty-nine patients (57%) and 663 (60%) were male. The median follow-up in patients with SMM and MM was 4.7 (0.1 - 11.0) and 2.6 years (0.2 - 9.5). The median overall survival for patients with SMM and MM was 9.0 (95% CI 8.4 - 9.7) and 7.9 years (6.4 - 8.7). With age- and sex-matched population controls as the reference, the SMRs in patients with SMM and MM were 2.6 (95% CI 2.2 - 3.0) and 4.6 (4.1 - 5.2). Among those MM patients with available data on ISS staging and FISH cytogenetics, 30% (236/780) had ISS III and 21% (188/878) had high-risk cytogenetics. Patients with MM (compared to SMM) experienced worse overall survival (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.8, p < 0.001, n = 1697). Patients with ISS I/II MM (compared to SMM) experienced similar survival (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8 - 1.3, p = 0.698, n = 1131). Patients with ISS III MM (compared to MM with high-risk cytogenetics) experienced similar survival (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9 - 2.0, p = 0.128, n = 329). Conclusions: Patients with SMM and MM in this cohort experienced excess mortality compared to the general population. In the absence of universal screening the true morbidity and mortality of patients with SMM and MM remains unknown and is likely overestimated in hospital-based cohorts. Overall survival in patients diagnosed with SMM and patients with ISS I/II MM receiving contemporary anti-myeloma therapy was clinically indistinguishable. Patients treated for ISS III MM experienced overall survival similar to patients with cytogenetic high-risk disease. MM remains associated with excess mortality, the magnitude of which varies considerably based on the presence of additional tumor and host factors. The outcomes with modern therapy among the ISS I/II patients highlight the potential for improving outcomes of SMM by early intervention, especially for the higher risk patients. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:Medscape: Consultancy; Alnylam: Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Honoraria; annexon: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Consultancy. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Russell:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document