Evaluation of the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) in an Independent Cohort of Unselected Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Abstract The International Staging System (ISS), which is based on beta2-microblobulin (β2M) and serum albumin, has been widely used for the risk stratification of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, since 2003. Chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by iFISH have been also recognized as strong prognostic factors, while elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has been consistently associated with poor prognosis. In order to improve the prognostic power of ISS, IMWG has revised ISS (R-ISS) by adding high risk cytogenetics by iFISH and serum LDH: R-ISS-1 includes patients with ISS-1 (serum β2M level <3.5 mg/L and serum albumin level ≥3.5 g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)] and normal LDH levels (below the upper limit of normal (UNL)); R-ISS-3 includes patients with ISS-3 (serum β2M level >5.5 mg/L) and either high-risk CA or high LDH level; and R-ISS-2 includes all the other possible combinations. R-ISS was based on the data of 3,060 patients who had participated in clinical trials. However, it has not been validated in an independent cohort of unselected patients. Our aim was to evaluate R-ISS in consecutive, unselected patients, treated in a single center. Our study included 475 patients with available data for cytogenetics [t(4;14) and del17p by iFISH], LDH and ISS. Median age was 67 years (range 27-91); 53% were >65 years and 25% >75 years of age. Only 8.6% did not receive new drugs as primary therapy; 42% received IMiDs (19% thalidomide-based, 23% lenalidomide-based) and 49% bortezomib-based primary therapy, while 36% received ASCT. In the IMWG cohort, 65% had received ASCT, 6% no new drugs, 44% proteasome inhibitors and 66% IMiDs. Per ISS, 24% were ISS-1, 34% ISS-2 and 42% ISS-3. High risk cytogenetics (either t(4;14) or del17p) were present in 23.5% and elevated LDH in 15%. In the IMWG cohort used for the formulation of R-ISS, 38% were ISS-1, 38% ISS-2 and 24% ISS-3; thus, our patients had more often ISS-3 and less often ISS-1 disease. High risk CAs and elevated LDH were not different compared to our cohort of patients (24% and 13%, respectively). The difference in ISS disposition between the two cohorts probably reflects the unselected nature of our population, which also included patients with severe renal impairment who often are excluded from clinical trials. Per R-ISS, 85 (18%) patients had R-ISS-1, 83 (17.5%) had R-ISS-3 and 306 (64.5%) had R-ISS-2. The disposition in the original cohort was 28% for R-ISS-1, 62% for R-ISS-2 and 10% for R-ISS-3. This difference was due to the higher proportion of patients with ISS-3 disease in our cohort. The R-ISS disposition in those ≤65 years, was 21%, 60% and 19% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3; among patients 66-75 years it was 19%, 63% and 18%, and among those >75 years it was 11%, 74% and 15%, respectively (p=0.128). The median follow up was 40 months; 57% of patients progressed or died and 63% have remained alive. Median PFS was 27 months and estimated median OS was 63 months. Median PFS for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3 was 34, 28 and 17 months, respectively (p<0.001). According to R-ISS, the probability of 3-year OS was 83%, 69% and 45% and of 5-year OS 77%, 53% and 19% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3, respectively (p<0.001). In patients treated with ASCT, the probability for 5-year OS per R-ISS stage was 93%, 77% and 32%, respectively (p<0.001), while for patients not treated with HDM it was 64%, 41% and 13% (p<0.001). The probability for 5-year OS for patients treated with bortezomib was 95%, 69% and 18% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3 (p<0.001) and for those treated with IMiDs, it was 68%, 41% and 23%, respectively (p=0.002). We evaluated the performance of R-ISS in patients ≤65, 66-75 and >75 years. In patients ≤65 years, the probability for 5-year OS was 84%, 71% and 29%, for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3 (p<0.001); for patients 66-75 years, it was 73%, 43% and 18% (p=0.001), while in patients >75 years, the median OS was >5 years, 35 and 29 month, respectively (p=0.122). Thus, R-ISS identified a group of patients >75 with favorable prognosis, although there was no significant difference in the OS for R-ISS-2 vs -3, probably due to the impact of other comorbidities and performance status of the very elderly. In conclusion, our data in consecutive, unselected patients, with differences in the characteristics and treatment approaches compared to the original IMWG cohort, verified that R-ISS provides significant prognostic information and it allows the identification of three different patient groups with clearly different outcome. Disclosures Terpos: Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel expenses; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Combination of Frailty and ISS Scores Identifies a Simple Prognostic Index for Overall Survival in Elderly Patients Treated with Novel Agents-Based Induction Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4740.4740 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4740-4740

Author(s):

Alessandra Larocca ◽

Sara Bringhen ◽

Roman Hajek ◽

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Massimo Offidani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Intensity ◽

Staging System ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Frail Patients ◽

International Staging System ◽

Frailty Score

Abstract Background: Several biological parameters define patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at high-risk of progression or death. The well-known International Staging System (ISS), as well as age per se, are insufficient to explain differences of overall survival (OS) in patients over 65 years, who are 2/3 of newly diagnosed (ND) MM patients. We have recently showed that a frailty score combining age, functional status (Activity of Daily Living and Instrumental Activity of Daily living scores) and comorbidities (Charlson index) defines 3 categories of patients - fit, intermediate-fitness, frail - with significantly differences in OS and progression-free survival (Larocca A, et al. Blood 2013 122:687). Here we assess the causes of the different mortality in intermediate-fitness and frail groups compared to fit ones and present a final prognostic score based on the combination of ISS and frailty scores. Methods: NDMM patients over 65 years enrolled in 3 clinical trials, receiving either lenalidomide, bortezomib or carfilzomib were included in the analysis. Details on treatment regimens and results of these studies have previously been reported (Palumbo A, et al. Blood 2013 122:536; Larocca A, et al. Blood 2013 122:539, Bringhen S et al. Blood 2014 Jul 3;124(1):63-9). The cumulative incidences of discontinuation and toxicities were calculated using the Fine & Gray model. The frailty score was combined with ISS with the CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method used as an iterative decision tree. Results: 869 patients (median age 74 years) were included in the analysis; 260 (30%) were frail, 269 (31%) intermediated-fitness and 340 (39%) fit. The 3-year OS was 57% in frail, 76% in intermediated-fitness and 84% in fit patients. Overall, 143 patients (16%) died, 70 (27%) frail, 39 (14%) intermediate-fitness and 34 (10%) fit. The causes of death were: disease progression [35 (13%) in frail, 22 (8%) in intermediate-fitness and 18 (5%) in fit patients] and toxicity [21 (8%), 10 (4%) and 11 (3%), respectively]. The higher risk of death for progression was related with the lower dose-intensity due to the higher rate of drug discontinuation and/or dose reduction. The average dose intensity was lower in frail (74%, p=0.0006) and intermediate-fitness patients (80%, p=0.07) compared with fit patients (85%). The cumulative incidence of drug discontinuation for any cause, excluding progression and death, was higher in frail (25%; HR 2.21, p<0.001) and intermediate-fitness (22%; HR: 1.41, p=0.052) patients compared with fit ones (17%). The most frequent reasons for toxicity-related death were cardiac events [11 (4%) in frail patients, 2 (1%) in intermediate-fitness, 3 (1%) in fit] and infections [8 (3%), 2 (1%) and 2 (1%), respectively]. When we combined the frailty score with the ISS, 6 groups of patients and 4 risk categories were identified: fit patients with ISS I at low risk (15%; 3-year OS: 94%), fit patients with ISS stage II or III and intermediate-fitness patients with ISS I, II or III at intermediate risk (55%; 3-year OS: 75-77%.), frail patients with ISS stage I or II at high risk (19%; 3-year OS: 61%) and frail patients with ISS stage III at very-high risk (11%, 3-year OS: 55%) (Figure 1). Conclusion: The inferior survival observed among intermediate-fitness and in frail patients as compared to fit ones, is related to a higher rate of toxic deaths and disease progression, due to a lower dose intensity. The combination of the frailty score, evaluating the patient's status, and the standard ISS, taking into account the biological characteristics of the disease, can predict survival and enhances the single predictive values of the scores, thus representing a valuable tool for treatment-decision in the clinical practice. Figure 1. Overall survival of patients classified into 6 categories according to the recursive partitioning analysis by combining the frailty score and the International Staging System. Figure 1. Overall survival of patients classified into 6 categories according to the recursive partitioning analysis by combining the frailty score and the International Staging System. Disclosures Larocca: Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use off-label of lenalidomide (immunomodulatory drug), carfilzomib (proteasome inhibitor), subcutaneous bortezomib (proteasome inhibitor) in terms of schedule used and combination.. Bringhen:Onyx: Consultancy; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen and Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Hajek:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Offidani:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Maracci:Mundipharma: Honoraria. Gay:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marasca:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Giuliani:Celgene: Research Funding. Musto:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Combining Information Regarding Chromosomal Aberrations t(4;14), Del(17p13) and the Copy Number of 1q21 with the International Staging System Classification Allows Stratification of Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results From the HOVON-65/GMMG HD4 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.332.332 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 332-332

Author(s):

Kai Neben ◽

Henk M. Lokhorst ◽

Anna Jauch ◽

Uta Bertsch ◽

Thomas Hielscher ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Risk Group ◽

Staging System ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Low Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

International Staging System

Abstract Abstract 332 PURPOSE : In Multiple Myeloma (MM), the combination of serum beta-2-microglobulin level with serum albumin concentration has been proposed as an outcome predictor in the International Staging System (ISS). More recently, subgroups of MM defined by genetic and cytogenetic abnormalities have been associated with unique biologic, clinical, and prognostic features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic value of 12 chromosomal abnormalities by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in a series of 354 MM patients treated within the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial. Patients with newly diagnosed MM were randomized to receive either three cycles of VAD (arm A; vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone) or PAD (arm B; bortezomib, adriamycin, dexamethasone). All patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by maintenance therapy with thalidomide 50 mg daily (arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks (arm B), respectively. In addition, a second cohort of patients was analyzed as a control group (n=462), undergoing ASCT at the University of Heidelberg between September 1994 and December 2010. RESULTS: For the entire group of patients treated within the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial, we identified 233 patients with 2 copies (67.7%), 95 patients with 3 copies (27.6%) and 16 patients (4.7%) with more than three copies of the chromosomal region 1q21. In addition to del(17p13) and t(4;14), we added +1q21 (>3 copies) to the group of high-risk aberrations, since the outcome of these patients was almost as poor as it was observed for patients with del(17p13). Subsequently, we analyzed whether combining the ISS score with information on the presence of high-risk aberrations could improve the prognostic value with regard to patients' outcome. A combination of the presence or absence of del(17p13), t(4;14), or +1q21 (>3 copies) with the ISS score allowed patients to be stratified into three distinct groups: low-risk [absence of del(17p13)/t(4;14)/+1q21 (>3 copies) and ISS I], high-risk [presence of del(17p13)/t(4;14)/+1q21 (>3 copies) and ISS II/III], and intermediate-risk (all remaining patients). Most of the patients belonged to the low- (33%) and intermediate-risk (49%) groups, whereas 18% were allocated to the high-risk group. The median PFS times for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 41.9 months, 31.1 months (HR=1.7; p=0.0018) and 18.7 months (HR=3.6; p<0.0001), respectively. The 3yr-overall survival (OS) decreased from 94% in the low-risk group to 80% (HR=4.6; p=0.0001) and 43% (HR=12.8; p<0.0001) in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. These results were confirmed in the independent cohort of patients: From date of first ASCT, the median PFS times for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 43.3 months, 23.0 months (HR=1.5; p=0.015) and 13.8 months (HR=2.4; p=0.0003), respectively. The 4yr-OS decreased from 84% in the low-risk group to 71% (HR=2.1; p=0.0043) and 49% (HR=3.84; p<0.0001) in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our series, the ISS/FISH-based score/algorithm predicted PFS and OS much better than the ISS alone. Our results with molecular cytogenetic techniques may already have implications for the risk-adapted clinical management of patients with MM particularly in younger patients. Disclosures: van de Velde: Ortho Biotech Oncology Research & Development: Employment. Sonneveld:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Evolving Unmet Need in Patients Refractory to Lenalidomide: Overview of the Clinical Trials in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142642 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 22-23

Author(s):

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Rohan Medhekar ◽

Istvan Majer ◽

Mehmet Turgut

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Literature Review ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Of Therapy

Introduction: The majority of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients are currently treated with lenalidomide-based regimens as their first line of therapy. This trend is likely to continue in the coming years. Typically, lenalidomide is administered until disease progression and has significantly contributed to better outcomes in these patients. However, most patients relapse, and prognosis worsens with each relapse. The choice of optimal treatment for patients who relapse while receiving lenalidomide as first line of therapy is unclear. Moreau et al (Blood Cancer J. 9, 38 [2019]) concluded that there is limited data on approved combinations for treating these patients and are restricted by the low number of lenalidomide-refractory patients enrolled in the pivotal trials. Results from the ongoing clinical trials of the combination of carfilzomib and anti-CD38 antibodies were not available at the time of the Moreau et al publication. The aim of this targeted literature review was to include this new data and to summarize currently available evidence on progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment of RRMM patients who progressed on lenalidomide-based regimens. Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify registrational clinical trials in patients with RRMM reporting PFS outcomes. PubMed, congress proceedings, and product labels were searched between Jan 2014 to July 2020. In addition to PFS, demographic, disease characteristics and treatment history were extracted for the trial populations to contextualize potential variations in study outcomes. The regimens studied in these trials were classified as lenalidomide-based, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based and pomalidomide-based. Number of prior lines of therapy, prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide and bortezomib were reported. Results: Twelve registrational trials were identified based on the search criteria (Table 1). Most pivotal trials assessing lenalidomide-based regimens (POLLUX, ELOQUENT-II, TOURMALINE-MM1) except the ASPIRE trial excluded patients who were refractory to lenalidomide. Trials evaluating PI-based regimens (e.g., CANDOR) or pomalidomide-based regimens (e.g., OPTIMISMM) included these patients, with more recent studies enrolling a larger proportion. Percentage of lenalidomide-exposed (and lenalidomide refractory) ranged from 40% (32%) in CANDOR to 98% (90%) in ELOQUENT III. These studies also enrolled a larger proportion of patients who were bortezomib-exposed, although most of these patients were at first relapse, with the exception of ELOQUENT III and ICARIA where most patients were at third relapse. Among lenalidomide-refractory patients, the median-PFS (mPFS) observed for the pomalidomide-based regimens ranged from 9.5 to 10.1 months and that observed for PI-based regimens ranged from 4.9 to 25.7 months. PFS in the lenalidomide-refractory subgroup was considerably shorter than in the ITT population. The mPFS for patients receiving carfilzomib/daratumumab/dexamethasone (KDd; CANDOR) and isatuximab/carfilzomib/dexamethasone (IsaKd; IKEMA) was not reached at median follow-up of 16.9 and 20.7 months respectively. While the mPFS for (KDd) for lenalidomide-refractory patients in CANDOR trial was not yet reached at median follow up of 16.9 months; the mPFS of 25.7 months for KDd in the MMY-1001 trial appears to be the longest among the assessed regimens. Conclusion: Patients refractory to lenalidomide have shorter PFS and represent a population with high unmet need. This targeted literature review suggests that the PI-based KDd regimen provides longer PFS compared to other lenalidomide-sparing regimens in lenalidomide-refractory populations. Heterogeneity across trial populations may limit the comparability of these treatments. Disclosures Mateos: Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar-Zeltia: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Medhekar:Amgen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Majer:Amgen (Europe) GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text

Comprehensive evaluation of the revised international staging system in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents as a primary therapy

American Journal of Hematology ◽

10.1002/ajh.24891 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 92 (12) ◽

pp. 1280-1286 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Hyungwoo Cho ◽

Dok Hyun Yoon ◽

Jung Bok Lee ◽

Sung-Yong Kim ◽

Joon Ho Moon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Comprehensive Evaluation ◽

Staging System ◽

Novel Agents ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

International Staging System

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117871 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 804-804 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Mark Bustoros ◽

Chia-jen Liu ◽

Kaitlen Reyes ◽

Kalvis Hornburg ◽

Kathleen Guimond ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Rna Sequencing ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background. This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods. Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al., Blood 2014. The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and Dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This induction phase is followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle is defined as 28 consecutive days, and therapy is administered for a total of 24 cycles total. Bone marrow samples from all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Stem cell collection is planned for all eligible patients. Results. In total, 26 of the planned 56 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2017 to April 2018. The median age of the patients enrolled was 63 years (range, 41 to 73) with 12 males (46.2%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 18 patients. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 11 patients (61.1%). The median number of cycles completed was 8 cycles (3-15). The most common toxicities were fatigue (69.6%), followed by rash (56.5%), and neutropenia (56.5%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8.7%). One patient had grade 4 neutropenia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 hyperglycemia occurred in another patient. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who had at least 3 cycles of treatment was 89% (23/26), with 5 Complete Responses (CR, 19.2%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 34.6%), 9 partial responses (34.6%), and 3 Minimal Responses (MR, 11.5%). None of the patients have shown progression to overt MM to date. Correlative studies including WES of plasma cells and single-cell RNA sequencing of the bone microenvironment cells are ongoing to identify the genomic and transcriptomic predictors for the differential response to therapy as well as for disease evolution. Furthermore, we are analyzing the cfDNA and CTCs of the patients at different time points to investigate their use in monitoring minimal residual disease and disease progression. Conclusion. The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma. The high response rate, convenient schedule with minimal toxicity observed to date are promising in this patient population at high risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Further studies and longer follow up for disease progression are warranted. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Primary Therapy of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) with Weekly Bortezomib, Low-Dose Dexamethasone and Rituximab (BDR): A Phase II Study of the European Myeloma Network

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1941.1941 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1941-1941 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Ramón García-Sanz ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Pierre Morel ◽

Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Herpes Zoster ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Single Agent ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Ortho Biotech ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1941 Rituximab and bortezomib are active agents in the treatment of WM. Based on preclinical studies which indicated synergism between bortezomib and rituximab, in 2006 we designed a large phase II multicenter trial to evaluate the combination of these agents in previously untreated patients with WM requiring therapy based on consensus recommendations (Kyle et al, Sem Oncol 2003;30:116). This trial was conducted by the European Myeloma Network in 10 centers. In order to prevent the “IgM flare effect” seen with rituximab-based regimens, one course of single agent bortezomib was first administered at a standard dose of 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8 and 11. Ten days later, the patients received four courses of 35 days duration each. In courses 2 to 5, bortezomib was administered weekly at a dose of 1.6 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. During courses 2 and 5, immediately after the administration of bortezomib, patients received dexamethasone 40 mg IV followed by rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV. Patients received a total of 8 infusions of rituximab. Bortezomib was administered weekly in order to reduce the incidence of neurotoxicity which can be significant in WM patients treated with standard schedule bortezomib (Treon et al, Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:3320). A single dose of dexamethasone was given before each dose or rituximab in order to take advantage of potential synergism with rituximab and to reduce allergic reactions but to avoid steroid-induced complications. During treatment, valacyclovir prophylaxis for herpes zoster was prescribed. After completion of treatment, patients with CR, PR, MR or SD according to consensus criteria (Kimby et al, CLM 2006;3:380) were followed without further therapy until there was evidence of progressive disease. Dose modifications for toxicity were allowed and bortezomib could be reduced from 1.6 mg/m2 to 1.3 mg/m2 to 1.0 mg/m2. The trial was initiated in March 2007, 61 patients were scheduled to be enrolled and the study completed accrual in June 2010. Patients characteristics included: age >65 years in 60% of patients, hemoglobin <11.5 g/dL in 82%, platelet count <100×109/L in 17%, β2-microglobulin >3 mg/dL in 63%, serum monoclonal protein >7 g/dL in 3.4%, lymphadenopathy in 42%, splenomegaly in 29%, and B-symptoms in 42% of patients. According to IPSS for WM, 18% of patients were rated as low risk, 23% as intermediate risk and 59% as high risk. The main reasons to start treatment included cytopenias in 43% of patients, hyperviscosity in 22%, presence of B-symptoms in 18% and lymphadenopathy in 8%. So far, 54 patients are evaluable for response. On an intent to treat, response rating include CR in 2 (4%), PR in 33 (61%), MR in 8 (15%), SD in 5 (9%) and PD in 6 (11%) patients. In responding patients, at least MR occurred within 2.3 months of treatment and the median time to best response is 4.8 months. Plasmapheresis was not required in any patient before or after treatment with BDR. An “IgM flare phenomenon” was not seen and this was attributed to the initial course of single agent bortezomib. Median follow up for all patients is 12 months, and so far 10 patients have progressed. Eight patients have died, 5 due to causes unrelated to WM or complications of treatment. Toxicities include: neutropenia (grade ≥3) in 13% of patients; thrombocytopenia (grade ≥3) in 5%; peripheral sensory neuropathy, grade 1,2 in 30%, but grade ≥3 in only 5%; neuropathic pain in 17%, but grade ≥3 in only 2%, gastrointestinal toxicity, grade 3 in 7%; and infections in 17% (grade ≥3 in 7%). One patient died of septic shock in absence of neutropenia. Three patients (5%) experienced pulmonary toxicity (grade 3/4) which was attributed to bortezomib and consisted of dyspnea, decrease of O2 saturation and diffuse pulmonary infiltrates on chest CT scan. This toxicity resolved completely after administration of steroids and 2 of 3 patients continued treatment as per protocol. Only one patient (who had discontinued valacylovir prophylaxis) developed herpes zoster. The dose of bortezomib was reduced in 30% of patients primarily because of peripheral neuropathy. This is the largest trial that has evaluated the role of a bortezomib-containing regimen in the frontline setting of symptomatic patients with WM, most of whom were rated as high risk according to IPSS. We conclude that the BDR regimen is active. An update on response, toxicity and time to progression will be performed in November 2010. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Ortho-Biotech: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bortezomib for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. García-Sanz:Ortho-Biotech: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Merlini:Millennium: Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech: Honoraria. Sonneveld:Ortho-Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

New US Myeloma Registry (Connect MM® – The Multiple Myeloma Disease Registry): Features of Newly Diagnosed Patients In 2010

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.5032.5032 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 5032-5032

Author(s):

Brian G. M. Durie ◽

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Rafat Abonour ◽

Cristina Gasperetto ◽

Jayesh Mehta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Staging System ◽

Bone Lesions ◽

Case Report Form ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Community Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prior Therapy

Abstract Abstract 5032 Background: In the past decade, with the availability of novel therapies, the paradigm for myeloma management has changed. In 2010 it is especially important to understand baseline features and initial treatment decisions. The goal of the Connect MM® registry is to characterize patients with newly diagnosed active myeloma from 200 US sites. Approximately 80% of the patient population will be enrolled from community-based practices and 20% from academic centers. An electronic case report form was developed to collect clinical data, physician choices, patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and response, as well as data on survival end points. This is a prospective, observational, longitudinal study with a target accrual of 1,500 patients in 3 years, with a 5 year follow-up from the time of informed consent. There are no mandated treatments or clinical assessments. However, there are data collection requirements for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Results: Since late 2009, 340 patients from 135 sites have been accrued and were included in this interim analysis. Current study demographics include: 60% male, 83% white, and 14% black, with a median age of 67 years. Thus far, 97% have been enrolled from community-based practices. All patients met study enrollment criteria and had active myeloma at entry; prior monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) was reported in 13% and smoldering MM in 8%. International Staging System (ISS) staging for evaluable patients were 26.3%, 36.4%, 37.3% for stages I, II, and III, respectively. Durie-Salmon Stage (A or B) were 13%, 35%, 52% for stages I, II, and III, respectively. Staging procedures included 82% skeletal survey; 44% computed tomography (CT); 40% magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 7% positron emission tomography (PET); 2% PET/CT; and 4% had no imaging. International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) CRAB criteria were assessed in all enrolled patients; 9% had hypercalcemia, 18% renal insufficiency, 36% anemia, and 66% had bone lesions. Median values were: calcium 9.5 mg/dL; serum creatinine 1.1 mg/dL; hemoglobin 10.9 gm/dL. Only 9% of patients had 3 or 4 CRAB features, while 49% had only 1 feature and 26% were asymptomatic (ECOG=0). The incidence of baseline peripheral neuropathy was 6%. Initial pain led to radiation therapy for 10% of patients, with 16% having vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Cytogenetic studies were performed at baseline in 64% of patients and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies in 54%. Cytogenetics and FISH were normal in 27% of patients, while in 20% both were abnormal in patients who had both performed. FISH was abnormal with normal cytogenetics in 41% and only 2% had normal FISH but abnormal cytogenetics. The most common FISH abnormalities were: 13 q- (31%), 17 p- (28%), t(4; 14) (16%). Freelite® testing was performed in 56% of patients with an abnormal ratio in 94% [rFLC]. Of evaluable patients receiving frontline therapy 98% of patients received a novel agent and only 3 patients (1.4% of treated patients) received melphalan/prednisone. Two drug combinations were used in 53%, 3 drugs in 26%, 4 drugs in 1.3%, and single agents were used in 21% of the patients. The most common regimens were: bortezomib+dexamethasone (28%), lenalidomide+dexamethasone (20%), and bortezomib+lenalidomide+ dexamethasone (15%). Conclusion: These baseline features and treatment choices characterize myeloma patients primarily in community-based practices in the US in 2010. As academic centers enroll more patients, we will be able to further characterize that population. Of particular note, 26% of patients were asymptomatic at baseline but had biochemical evidence of myeloma and met enrollment criteria; conversely 95% had an abnormal rFLC and 73% had abnormal chromosome results. The Connect MM® registry will provide data regarding patient features as they pertain to patterns in testing and treatment in the clinical practice setting, as well as response and survival outcomes. Disclosures: Durie: Celgene & Millennium: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Revlimid (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Abonour:Celgene & Millennium: Honoraria. Gasperetto:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Mehta:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding. Pashos:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Swern:Celgene: Employment. Street:Celgene: Employment. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rifkin:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau; Dendreon: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Treated With Lenalidomide Induction and Maintenance Show a Low Incidence Of Second Primary Malignancies (SPMs)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2074.2074 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2074-2074

Author(s):

Annamaria Brioli ◽

Charlotte Pawlyn ◽

Walter Gregory ◽

Samantha Hinsley ◽

Samantha Marshall ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Incidence Rate ◽

Maintenance Treatment ◽

New Drugs ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Non Invasive ◽

To Receive

Abstract Introduction New drugs have significantly improved the outcome of MM patients (pts) increasing both progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among new drugs lenalidomide (LEN) due to its oral availability and favourable toxicity profile is an attractive option both as an induction and as a maintenance treatment, with different studies demonstrating its effectiveness. Long term therapy with LEN, however, has been associated with an increased risk of developing SPMs. Aims We are conducting a large phase III study to evaluate the use of LEN as induction and/or as maintenance therapy. The primary end points of the study are OS and PFS. Secondary end points are response and toxicity. Methods Pts are treated following an intensive or a non intensive pathway based on their eligibility for high dose Melphalan (HDM) and stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and are randomised to receive induction therapy with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone combined with either LEN (CRD) or thalidomide (CTD). Pts failing to achieve an optimal response are randomised to receive additional therapy with cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone and bortezomib (CVD) or no extra therapy. Pts with minimal or no response will automatically receive further therapy with CVD. A randomisation between LEN maintenance and no maintenance is also performed. Data on the occurrence of SPMs are being routinely collected as part of safety assessment during all protocol phases and follow up. Analyses were performed on treatment actually received. Results As per cut off of the 23rd July, 2371 pts have undergone the induction randomisation, of which 2368 are eligible for the safety analysis; 794 pts entered maintenance randomisation. The median follow up is 1.36 years from initiation of the study and 1.06 years from maintenance randomisation. Localised skin cancer other than melanoma were considered as non-invasive SPMs. At the time of the present analysis 17 SPMs have been reported with a cumulative incidence rate of 0.7% (cumulative rate of 0.6% for invasive SPMs and 0.1% for non-invasive SPMs); four additional patients, reported as having a SPM, were excluded, after central review of the data, either due to a previous history of malignancy or because of the evidence of a pre-existing tumour other than MM at the time of study entry. The median age at the time of SPMs development is 72 years (range 61-92), and the median time from trial entry to development of SPMs is 11 months (range 2.1-27.0). The most common SPMs reported were squamous cell carcinoma (4 pts, 2 invasive and 2 non invasive), breast cancer (3 pts), colon cancer (2 pts) and prostate cancer (2 pts). No haematological SPM has so far been reported. One patient, treated according to the intensive arm with LEN both as induction and maintenance, was reported as having a suspect myelodysplasia (MDS) due to anaemia and thrombocytopenia 2.7 months after entering the maintenance randomisation. No clear histological sign of MDS was found and the values improved after stopping maintenance treatment; these data fit with treatment related toxicity and not with the development of a MDS, and the patient was excluded from this analysis. Ten out of 17 SPMs developed during maintenance treatment or follow up phase, with 7 patients having received LEN maintenance. Median time from maintenance randomisation to SPMs development is 7 months (range 2-20.6 months). The remaining 7 were diagnosed during or immediately after induction. About half of the patients (8/17) were randomised to receive LEN induction; 3 patients received LEN both as induction and as maintenance. Interestingly only one of those 3 pts had been treated according to the intensive arm. With a median follow up of 1.36 years the estimated incidence rate at 1 and 2 years are 0.70% (95% CI .40-1.22)and 1.17% (95% CI .70-1.96) respectively (Figure 1). Conclusions Our data do not confirm previous findings of an excess risk of SPMs in association with the use of LEN and HDM in presenting patients, with 12/17 pts developing SPMs treated on the non intensive pathway that does not contain HDM. Most importantly only 0.4% of the patients enrolled within the intensive pathway developed a SPM, with only 2 of them receiving LEN maintenance. Longer follow up will help to further elucidate the risk of LEN associated SPMs. On behalf of the NCRI Haemato-Oncology subgroup Disclosures: Brioli: Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: The presentation include the use of Lenalidomide as induction and as maintenance treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Cook:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morgan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Persistent Improvement In Clinical Outcomes With Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone Vs Thalidomide-Dexamethasone Incorporated Into Double Autologous Transplantation For Multiple Myeloma: An Updated Analysis Of Phase 3 Gimema-MMY-3006 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2090.2090 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2090-2090 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michele Cavo ◽

Monica Galli ◽

Annalisa Pezzi ◽

Francesco Di Raimondo ◽

Claudia Crippa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Low Risk ◽

Standards Of Care ◽

Consolidation Therapy ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Over the last years, incorporation of novel agents into autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has improved markedly the outcomes of younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Superior results with experimental treatments vs previous standards of care have been frequently reported after preliminary analyses and need to be confirmed with longer follow up. The randomized phase 3 GIMEMA-MMY-3006 study was designed to compare bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) vs thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, double ASCT. Data from the initial analysis, with a median follow up of 36 months, demonstrated that patients randomized to the VTD arm enjoyed superior complete/near complete response (CR/nCR) rates after both induction and consolidation therapy, and had a significantly longer PFS compared to those prospectively assigned to the TD arm. We performed an updated analysis of the study after a median follow up of 59 months and results are herein reported. A persistent TTP and PFS benefit with incorporation of VTD into ASCT was confirmed. On an intention-to-treat analysis of 236 patients randomized to the VTD arm, median TTP was 62 months and median PFS was 57 months. The median values for 238 patients randomly assigned to the TD arm were 45 months for TTP (HR=0.64, p=0.001) and 42 months for PFS (HR=0.66, p=0.001) (Fig. 1). With the longer follow up of this analysis, an initial divergence between OS curves could be appreciated after 4 years, although the difference was not yet statistically significant at 6 years (75% for VTD vs 69% for TD). Superiority of VTD over TD for TTP and PFS was retained across prespecified subgroups of patients with high risk and low risk disease. In particular, PFS benefit with VTD was seen for patients age >60 years (HR=0.62, p=0.013) and younger than 60 years (HR=0.70, p=0.026), with ISS stage 1 (HR=0.59, p=0.009) and ISS stage 2-3 (HR=0.69, p=0.018), and for those with t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR=0.43, p<0.001) and with t(4;14) alone [t(4;14) positivity but lack of del(17p)] (HR=0.41, p=0.001). In comparison with patients with t(4;14) positivity who were randomized to TD, those assigned to the VTD arm had significantly longer PFS (median: 24 vs 53 months, HR=0.41, p=0.0007) (Fig. 2) and a trend towards longer OS (4-year estimates: 66% vs 81%, p=0.052). By the opposite, similar PFS curves were seen for patients in the VTD group regardless of the presence or absence of t(4;14) (Fig. 3). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, randomization to the VTD arm was an independent factor predicting for prolonged PFS (HR=0.64, P=0.001). Additional disease- and treatment-related variables independently affecting PFS included attainment of CR/nCR after both induction (HR=0.64, p=0.010) and consolidation therapy (HR=0.57, p<0.001), β2-m >3.5 mg/L (HR=1.7, p<0.001) and presence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR=2.0, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, β2-m, cytogenetic abnormalities and attainment of CR/nCR after consolidation therapy were independently associated with OS. With an updated median follow-up of 49 months from the landmark of starting consolidation therapy, median PFS was 50 months for patients receiving VTD consolidation and 38 months for those treated with TD (HR= 0.69, P=0.015) (Fig. 4). Superior PFS with VTD vs TD consolidation therapy was observed for patients who failed CR/nCR after the second ASCT (HR=0.48, P=0.003) and was retained in both low risk and high risk subgroups. Finally, duration of OS from relapse or progression was similar between the two treatment groups (median, 42 for VTD vs 35 months for TD, p=0.47), even when bortezomib was incorporated into salvage therapy. In conclusion, this updated analysis of the GIMEMA-MMY-3006 study demonstrated: 1) a persistent PFS benefit with VTD vs TD in the overall population, as well as in subgroups of patients with high risk and low risk MM; 2) the ability of VTD, but not of TD, incorporated into double ASCT to overcome the adverse prognosis related to t(4;14); 3) the significant contribution of VTD consolidation to improved outcomes seen for patients randomized to the VTD arm; 4) the lack of more resistant relapse after exposure to VTD as induction and consolidation therapy compared to TD. A longer follow up is required to assess the OS benefit, if any, with VTD plus double ASCT. Disclosures: Cavo: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tacchetti:Janssen and Celgene: Honoraria. Zamagni:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Caravita:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Brioli:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Multiple Myeloma (MM): Impact of Immunoglobulin Isotype on the Speed of Response

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4191.4191 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4191-4191 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Helene Caillon ◽

Michel Attal ◽

Philippe Moreau ◽

Thomas Dejoie

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Speed Of Response ◽

Measurable Disease ◽

Multiple Myelomas ◽

The Impact ◽

Monoclonal Components

Abstract Background: Detection and/or measurement of monoclonal components by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is essential for evaluation of response in multiple myeloma according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Patient peak on SPE has a single presentation due to the extreme heterogeneity of monoclonal components based on isotype of immunoglobulin (Ig), charge, polymerization, viscosity, precipitation … Regarding the Ig isotype, distribution of myelomas has been known for a long time with about 55 % of IgG myelomas, 25 % of IgA myelomas, and 15% of light chain multiple myelomas (LCMM). Therefore differences in terms of various physical and chemical characteristics are observed according to isotype such as half-lives (IgG : 7-21 days ; IgA : 6 days ; only a few hours for light chains of Ig). Considering both differences about frequency and clearance according to Ig isotype, we addressed the question of the impact of isotype on the speed of response in multiple myeloma. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess if the different isotypes of monoclonal components involved in multiple myeloma have an impact on the velocity and the depth of response. Design and methods: Data from two recent clinical trials conducted by IFM were analysed. The first analysis was based on patients enrolled in the IFM DFCI 2009 clinical trial who benefited of each of the three MRD points planned in this trial (after induction and autograft for one arm, pre-maintenance and post-maintenance). Patients were categorized on the isotype of the monoclonal component involved : IgG, IgA or IgD intact immunoglobulin multiple myelomas (IIMM) with serum measurable disease according to IMWG criteria (i.e. serum monoclonal peak ≥ 10 g/L), LCMM, and IIMM without any serum measurable disease (i.e. serum monoclonal peak < 10 g/L).The percentage of patients who achieved at least a very good partial response (VGPR) was evaluated globally as well as for each category defined. The same analysis was carried out for the IFM 2013-04 clinical trial with one response assessment, after four induction cycles. Results: Concerning IFM DFCI 2009 trial, 398 patients evaluated on the three MRD points could be included in this analysis, divided into 185 and 213 in each arm of treatment. Within the total enrolment, two types of response kinetics could be distinguished : for IgA, IgD IIMM, IIMM without serum measurable disease and LCMM, the gain of response between post-induction +/- autograft and post-maintenance is on average 11,1 points (6,7 - 15) when IgG myelomas presented a difference of VGPR percentage of 27,9 points. The same observation could be made for each arm of treatment : 16,6 and 5,8 points of VGPR percentage gained in each arm for the "faster response" group as defined previously, whereas 33,3 and 23,3 points were gained for IgG myelomas. Apart from this difference of kinetics, we notably observed that IgG myelomas never reached VGPR rates obtained with other isotype myelomas. About IFM 2013-04 trial, 264 patients could be evaluated in our analysis after four cycles of VTD (131) or VCD (133) for induction. 98,0% of IgA myelomas achieved at least VGPR after induction (96,3% for VTD arm and 100% for VCD arm) whereas only 50,6% for IgG myelomas (57,3% and 43,2%) and 68,3% for LCMM (46,7% for VTD arm and 80,8 for VCD arm). Conclusion: This study shows that time of evaluation is a key factor regarding the different speed of response for each isotype of Ig. IgA myelomas and LCMM have a faster response than IgG myelomas. IgG myelomas have a lower biochemical response than other isotype myelomas. Consequently, for an accurate interpretation of data in clinical trials, patients should be equally distributed in each arm of treatment according to their isotype. Ideally, to be compared, clinical trials should always have the same isotype distribution, especially when an early evaluation is performed such as after induction. Disclosures Attal: jansen: Honoraria; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text