Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Is an Heterogeneous Subgroup of Elderly AML Where Patient’s Fitness Criteria and ELN Prognostic Stratification Can be Applied to Guide Treatment Decisions: An Analysis of 127 Patients By the Network Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 953-953
Author(s):  
Erika Borlenghi ◽  
Chiara Pagani ◽  
Claudia Basilico ◽  
Massimo Bernardi ◽  
Matteo Carrabba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Elderly Aml ◽  
Prognostic Stratification ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: According to the WHO classification, secondary acute myeloid leukemia (s-AML) includes cases occurring in patients (pts) receiving prior antineoplastic treatments as well as cases developing in pts with a history of previous hematology disorders, such as a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or a chronic myeloproliferative disease (MPD). Outcomes for this large group of pts, which has a high median age and a high frequency of unfavourable cytogenetics, has been traditionally considered very poor, compared to AML developing “de novo”, and treatment with intensive chemotherapy (iCT) is not standardized in elderly pts. Indeed pts with s-AML have been excluded from molecular and cytogenetic prognostic stratification defined by the ELN criteria. Aim: Since patients with s-AML actually represent an heterogeneous subgroup of pts a multicenter retrospective study was performed to analyse their outcome in relationship to age, fitness and ELN risk stratification, in order to potentially identify subgroups at different prognosis. Patients and Methods: We evaluated 127 pts, representing 35% of a population-based series of elderly AML, aged > 65 years (y), diagnosed at five Hematology Centers of the Hematological Network of Lombardy in Northern Italy from January 2008 to May 2014. Thirteen pts (10%) had t-AML and 114 (90%) had AML secondary to previous hematological disorders (89 MDS and 25 MPD). Median age was 74 y (range 65-94 y). Performance status (PS) was evaluable in 122 pts (96%) and PS ECOG was >3 in 32 pts (26%). According to “fitness criteria”, (Ferrara et al, Leukemia, 2013), 126 pts (99%) were evaluable: 54 pts (42.5%) were fit to i-CT (FIT), 55 (43.3%) unfit to i-CT (UNFIT), 17 (13.4%) unfit to ni-CT (FRAIL). Intensive CT was given to 34 (27%), ni-CT (low-dose arac, azacytidine or experimental non-myelotoxic drugs) to 26 (20%) and best supportive care (BSC) to 67 pts (53%). Overall concordance between the fitness and the treatment actually received was 78%.The ELN prognostic criteria were applicable in 69 pts (54%), because of lack of complete molecular and cytogenetic data in the others. Six pts (8.5%, all NPM1+) were at low, 14 (20%) at intermediate-1, 11 (16%) at intermediate-2 and 38 (55%) at high risk. Results: The median OS according to fitness was 9,6, 4 and 3 months (ms), in FIT, UNFIT and FRAIL pts, respectively (p=0.0021) (Figure 1). Both the treatment received (i-CT or ni-CT vs BSC) and the risk ELN classification were related to OS (p< 0.0001 and p=0.0089, respectively). In FIT pts the median OS was 8 ms in pts treated with i-CT, 11 ms with ni-CT, and 3 ms with BSC (p<0.0001) (i-CT vs ni-CT : p=0.6) (Figure2). The achievement of CR was related to outcome (median OS 12.7 ms vs 5 ms) (p= 0.0035). AML with antecedent hematological disorder (53.8%) or with t-AML (50%) had similar CR rate (53,8% vs 50%) as well as OS (median OS 11 ms vs 7 ms) (p =0.5). According to ELN risk, OS was better in LR/Int-1/int2 vs HR (median OS 11,4 vs 5 ms, p=0.0035) (Figure 2). Moreover, also the achievement of CR was related to ELN risk: 100% in LR, 57% in Int1/Int2, 14% in HR (p= 0.012), and percentages differed from de novo AML only in HR pts. Prognosis of the subgroup of 34 ELN low/Int1 risk pts treated with i-CT was fair with CR rate of 53%, and 2 y OS 40% compared to 10% in similarly treated Int2/HR pts (p=0.07). Conclusion: Elderly pts with s-AML are an heterogeneous subgroup both according to fitness and to ELN risk stratification and these parameters are significantly related to clinical outcome. Overall prognosis of elderly patients with s-AML is not exceedingly worse than in elderly with de novo AML. Outcome was better using i-CT or ni-CT compared to BSC, with no differences between the two treatment modalities. ELN risk stratification merits to be applied also to patients with s-AML and its integration with fitness criteria can identify a subgroup of patients which may benefit from intensive CT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

FLT3, NPM1 and MLL Mutations Help Risk Stratification in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1574-1574
Author(s):  
Shuhong Shen ◽  
Yin Liu ◽  
JingYan Tang ◽  
Long-Jun Gu
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tandem Duplication ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Pediatric Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 1574 Poster Board I-600 Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease which harbors various genetic alterations. Among theses genetic events, Mutations of FLT3, NPM1, MLL and other genes often predict prognosis, particularly in cases cytogenetic normal (CN-AML). Could these be criteria for risk stratification in Pediatric AML ? Patients and Methods 155 cases of de novo AML were diagnosed routinely according to morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, and molecular biology examination on bone marrow (BM) aspirates between Jan. 2002 and Dec. 2008. All patients received chemotherapy according to the AML-XH-99 protocol, which consist of Daunorubicin, Cytosine arabinoside, Etoposide, Homoharringtonine. For acute promyelocytic leukemia, all-trans retinoic acid and Arsenic trioxide were also included. Meanwhile, total RNA of leukemic cells form all diagnostic BM samples were extracted, and then reverse transcribed. MLL partial tandem duplication (MLL/PTD) fusion transcripts were screened by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD), FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutation (FLT3/TKD) and NPM1 mutation were examined by High resolution melting analysis. Results Of the 155 children with de novo AML, 121(78.1%) had received chemotherapy for more than one week with data available for analysis. Among them, 55(45.5%) was cytogenetically normal (CN-AML). In this total cohort of patients 49(27.09%) had FLT3/ITD (32.70% in CN-AML), 14 (9.03%) had FLT3/TKD (7.30% in CN-AML), 62 (40%) had NPM1 mutation (49% in CN-AML), and additional 8 (5.16%) had MLL/PTD (5.50% in CN-AML). In this cohort of patients 98 (63.22%) had at least one mutation. The clinical outcomes were listed in table 1. Generally, patients with FLT3 mutation (ITD or TKD mutation) usually have worse results after chemotherapy, as reported previously by other researchers. Meanwhile, NPM1 mutations usually predict better prognosis in our cohort of AML patients. MLL/PTD always predicts the worst outcome in AML as other MLL rearrangements in leukemia. Among CN-AML patients, 5-year EFS and OS were similar to whole cohort of patients according to those mutations. Cox regression analysis in a univariate model revealed that the presence of FLT3/ITD and NPM1 was significant prognostic factor of EFS, (P<0.05). We therefore proposed a molecular-risk classification of pediatric AML patients based on the data we got in this study. For the newly classified groups of low, medium and high risk groups, EFS rate was 62.03%±8.42%, 45.42%±4.52%, and 14.85%±2.99%, respectively, P=0.00. CRD for the 3 groups was 27.69±21.34 months, 22.62±19.64 months, 13.26±11.95 months, respectively, p=.022. Our results indicate that combinations of these couple of molecular events may be the useful tool for further classify AML in children. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals De Novo and Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Real World Data on Outcomes from the French Nord-Pas-De-Calais Picardie Acute Myeloid Leukemia Observatory

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4013-4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loïc Renaud ◽  
Olivier Nibourel ◽  
Celine Berthon ◽  
Christophe Roumier ◽  
Céline Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Real World ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background. Population-based registries may provide data complementary to that from clinical intervention studies. Registries with high coverage of the target population reduce the impact of selection on outcome and the subsequent problem with extrapolating data to nonstudied populations like secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Actually, secondary AML are frequently excluded from clinical trials so the registries constitute the only way to fine data for establishing recommendations for the management of these patients in the real world. Method. The French Nord-pas-de-calais Picardie AML observatory containing 1 582 AML patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2015. We compared 974 primary AML to 514 Secondary AML include AML arising from a pre-existing myelodysplastic (n=211), myeloproliferative (n=88) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (n=57) disease and therapy related AML (t-AML) (n=158). Results. Median survival and 5 years overall survival were respectively 420 days [95%IC: 349-491] and 32% for patients with de novo AML; 157 days [95%IC: 118-196] and 7% for patients with secondary AML. 1101 patients were classified according to the MRC as favorable, intermediate and unfavorable, respectively 18(5.2%), 178(51.9%) and 147(42.9%) patients with secondary AML including 100(29.2%) complexes karyotypes and 117(15.4%), 468(61.7%) and 173(22.8%) patients with de novo AML including 121 (15.9%) complexes karyotypes. 987 patients were classified according to the ELN as favorable, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and unfavorable for respectively 35(11.7%), 53(17.7%), 67(22.%) and 144(48.2%) patients with secondary AML and 219(31.8%), 167(24.%), 136(19.8%) and 166(24.1%) patients with de novo AML. The age at diagnosis was significantly different (p < 10-3) with a median of 72.6 years for secondary AML and 63.2 for de novo AML. 206 (40.4%) patients with secondary AML received demethylating agents versus 184 (19%) for de novo AML and 152(29%) received high dose chemotherapy (HDC) versus 619 (63.9%) patients with de novo AML. Best supportive care was the only treatment for 170 (17.5%) de novo AML and 164 (31.9%) secondary AML patients. For patients over than 60 years old, median survival and 5 years overall survival were respectively 182 days [95%IC: 136.5-127.4] and 12.9% for 559 patients with de novo AML; 128 days [95%IC: 95.0-161.0] and <4% for 413 patients with secondary AML. Conclusion. The poor prognosis of secondary and t- AML is confirmed by this registry study. Possible explanations for this worse outcome could be older age at diagnosis and increased frequency of complex karyotypes which lead to less intensive therapy or supportive care only. In this specific population, the choice of demethylating agent therapy was frequently made because of the weak efficacy of HDC and increased frequency of side effects in this vulnerable group. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Complete Molecular Risk Stratification of De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Intermediate Cytogenetics Using an Eight-Gene Panel

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2333-2333
Author(s):  
Maya Thangavelu ◽  
Ryan Olson ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Wanlong Ma ◽  
Steve Brodie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Core Binding Factor ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Molecular Abnormality ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Refining risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using molecular profiling, especially those with intermediate cytogentic risk, is becoming standard of care. However, current WHO and ELN classifications are focused on few markers, mainly FLT3, NPM1, and CEBPA. While these abnormalities are relatively common, not all patients with AML and intermediate or normal cytogenetics will have abnormalities in these genes leaving large percentage of patients without refined risk stratification. We demonstrate that using 8 different AML-related genes are adequate to provide one or more molecular markers to further risk stratify patients with de novo AML. Method: Using direct sequencing we analyzed 211 samples referred from community practice with the diagnosis AML for molecular analysis. All samples were evaluated prospectively for mutations in FLT3, NPM1, IDH1, IDH2, CEBPA, WT1, RUNX1, and TP53 using direct sequencing. Fragment length analysis was used in addition to sequencing for FLT3 and NPM1. Available morphology, cytogenetics, and clinical data along with history were reviewed. Results: Of the 211 samples tested 103 (49%) had at least one or more molecular abnormality adequate for refining the risk classification. The mutations detected in these 103 patients were as follows: 27 (26%) FLT-ITD, 10 (10%) FLT3-TKD, 30 (29%) NPM1, 7 (7%) CEBPA, 14 (14%) IDH1, 13 (13%) IDH2, 10 (10%) WT1, 38 (37%) RUNX1, and 2 (2%) TP53. There was significant overlap and most patients had more than one mutation as illustrated in the graph below. However, if the testing was restricted to FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA and DNMT3A, only 56 (54%) would have had refined risk classification and 46% of patients would have remained without subclassification. The most striking finding was that all the remaining patients, who had no molecular abnormality detected in any of these 8 genes, had either history of MDS evolved to AML, therapy-related AML, or cytogenetic abnormalities other than intermediate (multiplex cytogenetic abnormalities or core-binding factor abnormality). Conclusion: Using FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, and DNMT3A is inadequate for the molecular characterization of patients with AML. Patients with de novo AML and intermediate risk cytogenetics can be adequately prognostically subclassified and molecularly studied by testing only 8 genes. More importantly, this data confirms that the molecular biology driving de novo AML is significantly different from that driving MDS, AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, therapy-related AML, or AML with core binding factor or multiplex cytogenetics. Unlike de novo AML, these entities should be molecularly studied using MDS-specific driver genes. Furthermore, this data suggests that different therapeutic approaches should be developed for MDS and MDS-related AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Heuser ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractThis analysis from the phase II BRIGHT AML 1003 trial reports the long-term efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized (2:1) patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (de novo, n = 38; secondary acute myeloid leukemia, n = 40) or LDAC alone (de novo, n = 18; secondary acute myeloid leukemia, n = 20). At the time of analysis, 90% of patients had died, with the longest follow-up since randomization 36 months. The combination of glasdegib and LDAC conferred superior overall survival (OS) versus LDAC alone; hazard ratio (HR) 0.495; (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.325–0.752); p = 0.0004; median OS was 8.3 versus 4.3 months. Improvement in OS was consistent across cytogenetic risk groups. In a post-hoc subgroup analysis, a survival trend with glasdegib + LDAC was observed in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.720; 95% CI 0.395–1.312; p = 0.14; median OS 6.6 vs 4.3 months) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.287; 95% CI 0.151–0.548; p < 0.0001; median OS 9.1 vs 4.1 months). The incidence of adverse events in the glasdegib + LDAC arm decreased after 90 days’ therapy: 83.7% versus 98.7% during the first 90 days. Glasdegib + LDAC versus LDAC alone continued to demonstrate superior OS in patients with acute myeloid leukemia; the clinical benefit with glasdegib + LDAC was particularly prominent in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01546038.

Antileukemic activity of rapamycin in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 2527-2534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Récher ◽  
Odile Beyne-Rauzy ◽  
Cécile Demur ◽  
Gaëtan Chicanne ◽  
Cédric Dos Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractThe mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key regulator of growth and survival in many cell types. Its constitutive activation has been involved in the pathogenesis of various cancers. In this study, we show that mTOR inhibition by rapamycin strongly inhibits the growth of the most immature acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines through blockade in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. Accordingly, 2 downstream effectors of mTOR, 4E-BP1 and p70S6K, are phosphorylated in a rapamycin-sensitive manner in a series of 23 AML cases. Interestingly, the mTOR inhibitor markedly impairs the clonogenic properties of fresh AML cells while sparing normal hematopoietic progenitors. Moreover, rapamycin induces significant clinical responses in 4 of 9 patients with either refractory/relapsed de novo AML or secondary AML. Overall, our data strongly suggest that mTOR is aberrantly regulated in most AML cells and that rapamycin and analogs, by targeting the clonogenic compartment of the leukemic clone, may be used as new compounds in AML therapy.

Chemotherapy and Venetoclax in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Trial (CAVEAT): A Phase Ib Dose-Escalation Study of Venetoclax Combined With Modified Intensive Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (30) ◽  
pp. 3506-3517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Chyn Chua ◽  
Andrew W. Roberts ◽  
John Reynolds ◽  
Chun Yew Fong ◽  
Stephen B. Ting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE The B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax has an emerging role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with promising response rates in combination with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine in older patients. The tolerability and efficacy of venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy in AML is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with AML who were ≥ 65 years (≥ 60 years if monosomal karyotype) and fit for intensive chemotherapy were allocated to venetoclax dose-escalation cohorts (range, 50-600 mg). Venetoclax was administered orally for 14 days each cycle. During induction, a 7-day prephase/dose ramp-up (days −6 to 0) was followed by an additional 7 days of venetoclax combined with infusional cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1-5 and idarubicin 12 mg/m2 intravenously on days 2-3 (ie, 5 + 2). Consolidation (4 cycles) included 14 days of venetoclax (days −6 to 7) combined with cytarabine (days 1-2) and idarubicin (day 1). Maintenance venetoclax was permitted (7 cycles). The primary objective was to assess the optimal dose schedule of venetoclax with 5 + 2. RESULTS Fifty-one patients with a median age of 72 years (range, 63-80 years) were included. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached with venetoclax 600 mg/day. The main grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicities during induction were febrile neutropenia (55%) and sepsis (35%). In contrast to induction, platelet recovery was notably delayed during consolidation cycles. The overall response rate (complete remission [CR]/CR with incomplete count recovery) was 72%; it was 97% in de novo AML and was 43% in secondary AML. During the venetoclax prephase, marrow blast reductions (≥ 50%) were noted in NPM1-, IDH2-, and SRSF2-mutant AML. CONCLUSION Venetoclax combined with 5 + 2 induction chemotherapy was safe and tolerable in fit older patients with AML. Although the optimal postremission therapy remains to be determined, the high remission rate in de novo AML warrants additional investigation (ANZ Clinical Trial Registry No. ACTRN12616000445471).

Expression of c-mpl mRNA, the receptor for thrombopoietin, in acute myeloid leukemia blasts identifies a group of patients with poor response to intensive chemotherapy.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2262-2268 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wetzler ◽  
M R Baer ◽  
S H Bernstein ◽  
L Blumenson ◽  
C Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Cd34 Expression ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE c-mpl, the human homolog of v-mpl, is the receptor for thrombopoietin. Given that c-mpl expression carries an adverse prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome and given the prognostic significance of expression of other growth factor receptors in other diseases, we attempted to determine whether c-mp/mRNA expression is a prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed bone marrow samples from 45 newly diagnosed AML patients by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS Samples from 27 patients (60%) expressed c-mpl mRNA (c-mpl+); their clinical and laboratory features were compared with those of the 18 patients without detectable levels of c-mpl(c-mpl-). No significant differences in age, sex, leukocyte count, French-American-British subtype, or karyotype group were found. c-mpl+ patients more commonly had secondary AML (41% v 11%; P = .046) and more commonly expressed CD34 (67% v 12%; P = .0004). There was no significant difference in complete remission (CR) rate. However, c-mpl+ patients had shorter CR durations (P = .008; median, 6.0 v > 17.0 months). This was true when only de novo AML patients were considered and when controlling for age, cytogenetics, or CD34 expression. There was a trend toward shorter survival in c-mpl+ patients (P = .058; median, 7.8 v 9.0 months). CONCLUSION These data suggest that c-mpl expression is an adverse prognostic factor for treatment outcome in adult AML that must be considered in the analysis of clinical studies using thrombopoietin in AML.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document