Phase 2 Study of Monotherapy Galunisertib (LY2157299 Monohydrate) in Very Low-, Low-, and Intermediate-Risk Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Abstract Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by bone marrow dysplasia and ineffective hematopoiesis. Zhou et al. showed that transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling was constitutively activated in MDS CD34+ cells and that this over-activation and subsequent myelosuppression was based on reduced expression of SMAD7, the natural inhibitor of TGF-β, in MDS CD34+ cells (Zhou L et al. Cancer Res 2011;71:955-963). Galunisertib specifically inhibited the kinase activity of the TGF-β receptor type I (TGF-βRI) also known as ALK5 and its downstream signaling pathway theoretically replaced the SMAD7 function. Galunisertib reversed hematopoietic suppression in human MDS bone marrow assays, and in a murine model of TGF-β derived bone marrow failure. Based on these preclinical studies that demonstrate hematological improvement (HI) in MDS models following galunisertib treatment, a single-arm phase 2 part of a phase 2/3 proof-of-concept study in very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk patients with MDS was conducted. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to estimate the HI rate based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria in patients with very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk MDS by Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), treated with galunisertib. Eligible patients were treated with galunisertib 300 mg/day (150 mg BID) orally for 14 days, followed by 14 days off, constituting a cycle of 28 days. Eligibility criteria permitted any prior therapy, all of which were required to be discontinued at least 28 days prior to initiation of galunisertib. Supportive therapies including ongoing transfusions were allowed. Eligibility criteria included confirmed diagnosis of MDS, anemia with hemoglobin ≤10.0 g/dL, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤2. Safety was assessed and summarized using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). Descriptive statistics were used to report baseline characteristics and response rates. Results: In this phase 2 study, 41 patients received galunisertib orally (N=39, 150 mg BID and N=2, 80 mg BID for PK comparison). Patients were 62% males. The median age was 71 years (range: 52-84), the majority of patients were classified as refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (66.7%) or refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (20.5%) based on WHO MDS classification. ECOG PS was 0/1 in 53.8%/46.2% of patients. Sixty-two percent of the patients received ≥6 cycles of treatment. Among the 39 patients receiving 150 mg BID, a total of 15 (38%) patients discontinued from the study within 6 cycles; one due to AE and 9 due to patient/physician decision. The most common possibly related any grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included fatigue (20.5%), diarrhea (15.4%), pyrexia (10.3%), vomiting (10.3%), anemia (7.7%), nausea (7.7%), urinary tract infection (7.7%), neutrophil count decreased (5.1%), and platelet count decreased (5.1%); 12 (30.8%) patients had grade 3/4 TEAEs, 4 (10.3%) were drug-related. One of the 39 patients was protocol ineligible and was removed from the efficacy analysis. Among the 38 evaluable patients in the ITT population, 14 of whom required fewer than 4 units of transfusion per 8 weeks, 10/38 (26%) patients achieved HI, defined as at least a continuous 8-week response with at least a 4-unit reduction in transfusion requirement from baseline or hemoglobin increase by at least 1.5 g/dL per 8-week period. Of these 10 patients, 4 became transfusion-independent, and 5 had transfusion reduction. In a subgroup of 24/38 patients who had a transfusion requirement of at least 4 units every 8 weeks at baseline, 9 (38%) of these patients achieved a transfusion reduction of at least 4 units. No apparent correlation between cytogenetics or MDS subtype including ringed sideroblasts and response was identified; however, only 14 patients had abnormal cytogenetics. No platelet or neutrophil responses were observed. Conclusion: Galunisertib is well tolerated in this MDS population where this ALK5 inhibitor was investigated for the first time. Patients most commonly discontinued from study treatment due to patient/physician decision and not for toxicity. The clinical endpoint of HI was observed in 26% of the ITT population, and no specific response sub-group was identified. Disclosures Valcarcel: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Boehringer: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Santini:celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Onconova: Honoraria, Research Funding. Díez-Campelo:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding. Schlenk:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Arog: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gaidano:MorphoSys; Roche; Novartis; GlaxoSmithKline; Amgen; Janssen; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards; Celgene: Research Funding. Perez de Oteyza:Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Cleverly:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chiang:Eli Lilly and Copany: Employment. Lahn:Eli Lilly and Company: Other: Former employee. Desiaih:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Guba:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Komrokji:Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparison of a Combination of Vosaroxin (VOS) and Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine (IDAC) with Idac for the Consolidation Therapy of Younger Patients with Favorable- and Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in First Complete Remission (CR): Preliminary Results of a Randomized Phase 2 R4-VOS Study of the French ALFA-Filo AML Intergroup

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137032 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 10-11

Author(s):

Norbert Vey ◽

Corentin Orvain ◽

Christian Recher ◽

Arnaud Pigneux ◽

Marc Bernard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Consolidation Phase

In spite of CR rates of 75-80% currently achieved with anthracycline-cytarabine regimens in younger patients with favorable and intermediate-risk AML, relapse remains a major issue. The French AML intergroup launched the BIG-1 trial in 2015 in order to test different strategies aiming at reducing relapse rate and improving survival. All patients with previously untreated non-APL and non-CBF AML aged 18-60 years are eligible for trial participation which is still ongoing. The trial design includes several randomizations (R): Idarubicin vs daunorubicin for induction (R1), HDAC vs IDAC for consolidation (R2), post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis modalities (R3). R4 consists of nested randomized phase 2-3 trials testing the addition of new drugs to the IDAC or HDAC backbones during the consolidation phase. The protocol was designed to allow the sequential evaluation of several new agents over the trial period. Vosaroxin (VOS) has shown antileukemic activity (Advani, Clin Cancer Res 2010). The combination of VOS and IDAC showed higher CR rate and a non-significant OS benefit as compared to a placebo-IDAC arm in a large phase 3 trial in patients with refractory/relapsed AML (Ravandi Lancet Oncol 2015). We hypothesized that the addition of VOS to IDAC would improve LFS as compared to IDAC alone when given during the consolidation phase. Methods. Eligibility criteria in the BIG-1 trial include: previously untreated AML according to WHO 2016 classification (AML secondary to an untreated myelodysplastic syndrome allowed), age 18-60, ECOG PS 0-2, no cardiac contra-indication to anthracyclines. Patients with APL and patients with CBF-AML are excluded. Eligibility criteria for R4 randomization were: Patients in first CR/CRp/CRi following 1 or 2 courses of induction chemotherapy according to the BIG-1 protocol; ELN2010 favorable- and intermediate-risk groups; ECOG PS ≤ 3; Absence of severe uncontrolled infection. Patients were scheduled to receive Cytarabine: 1.5 gr/m² twice daily on D1, 3, 5 with or without Vosaroxin: 70 mg/m² on D1 and D4 per cycle for a maximum of three cycles at 4-6 weeks intervals. Patients scheduled for allo-SCT or those who had reached CR after 2 induction cycles were to receive only 2 cycles of VOS-IDAC/IDAC. R4-VOS sub-trial was designed to detect an increase of the 18-month LFS from 55% to 75% using a two-step phase 2-3 study. With type I and II errors set at 20% and using a one-sided test, 70 patients had to be randomized. If the predefined statistical objectives were met, study would resume recruiting 130 additional patients in the phase 3 part for a total of 200 patients. Results. 70 patients (35 in each arm), median age 47, ELN 2010 favorable and intermediate risk groups, have been included. 94% had de novo AML with NPM1 mutations in 46% and FLT3-ITD in 20%. As shown in the Table, patients and disease characteristics were not different between the 2 arms except for slightly more patients in CRi in the VOS-IDAC arm. Patients received a median of 4 chemotherapy cycle (including induction; range 3-4) without difference between the treatment arms. 13 patients (18.5%) received an alloSCT (VOS-IDAC: 5, IDAC: 8). Time between cycle 1 and cycle 2 was significantly longer in the VOS-IDAC arm (p= 0.017). Hematologic toxicity was higher in the VOS-IDAC group with a significantly longer neutropenia duration after each cycle, a greater number of RBC and Platelet transfusions, a significantly greater number of days with antibiotics and antifungal therapies and days with fever (during cycle 1). There were also significantly more cutaneous toxicity, mild nausea/vomiting and diarrhea in the VOS-IDAC arm. With a median follow-up of 19 months, 14 and 15 patients relapse in the VOS-IDAC vs IDAC arms respectively. The study primary endpoint has not been reached and LFS was not significantly higher in the VOS-IDAC arm (18-month LFS of 51% vs 46% for VOS-IDAC vs IDAC respectively; see Figure) even after accounting for allo-SCT as a time-dependent variable (p-value=.49). The 2-year CIR was 51% vs 46% (p=NS) and 2-year OS was 88% vs 68% (p=NS). Conclusion, the study's primary endpoint has not been met and results fail to show a significant improvement of 18-month LFS with the addition of VOS to IDAC consolidation of favorable/intermediate-risk AML in first CR. The phase 3 part of the trial will not open. The BIG-1 trial is still ongoing and uses the same design to tests addition of other drugs to the IDAC/HDAC consolidation backbone. Disclosures Guieze: abbvie: Honoraria, Other: advisory board, travel funds; janssen cilag: Honoraria, Other: advisory board, travel funds; roche: Other: travle funds; gilead: Honoraria, Other: travel funds; astrazanecka: Honoraria, Other: advisory board. Dombret:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nova: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Menarini: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Cellectis: Consultancy; Shire-Baxalta: Consultancy; Immunogen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Hunault:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results of a Phase 2 Study of PD 0332991 in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2940.2940 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2940-2940

Author(s):

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Luciano J Costa ◽

Nisreen A. Haideri ◽

Georg Hess ◽

Seema Singhal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

D 20 ◽

Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Simtuzumab in Adult Subjects with Primary, Post Polycythemia Vera (PV) or Post Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2810.2810 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2810-2810

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Michael R. Savona ◽

Ruben A. Mesa ◽

Stephen Oh ◽

Hua Dong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Fibrosis Score ◽

Bone Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Stage 1 ◽

Marrow Fibrosis

Abstract Background: Simtuzumab (SIM) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits lysyl oxidase-like molecule 2 (LOXL2), an extracellular matrix enzyme that catalyzes the covalent cross-linking of collagen and is widely expressed across many fibrotic diseases. In pre-clinical models, inhibition of LOXL2 blocks fibroblast activation, which plays an important role in the development of organ fibrosis. In Phase 1 studies, SIM was well-tolerated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, liver fibrosis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). A Phase 2, open-label study to determine the efficacy of SIM alone (Stage 1) and combined with ruxolitinib (rux) (Stage 2) in pts with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-ET/PV MF was initiated. Methods: Eligible pts had intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high risk disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <2. The primary endpoint was rate of clinical response as defined by a reduction in bone marrow fibrosis score following 24 weeks of treatment with SIM. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 200 mg or 700 mg SIM by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks as monotherapy (Stage 1, n=24) or combined with rux (Stage 2, n=30). Patients received SIM for up to 24 weeks. Bone marrow biopsies and aspirates were performed approximately every 3 months. Bone marrow fibrosis scoring was performed and quantified at local investigator sites using the European Consensus on Grading Bone Marrow Fibrosis. Myelofibrosis symptoms were evaluated using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and changes in hematologic parameters and splenomegaly were assessed. Results: Between 7/14/11 and 9/22/14, 54 pts were randomized and treated (200 mg SIM [n=12], 700 mg SIM [n=12], 200 mg SIM/rux [n=15], and 700 mg SIM/rux [n=15]). In Stage 1, 0 subjects (0%) in the SIM 200 mg group and 2 subjects (16.7%; 90% CI 3.0%, 43.8%) in the SIM 700 mg group showed a reduction in bone marrow fibrosis score from Baseline to Week 24. In Stage 2, 1 subject (6.7%; 90% CI 0.3%, 27.9%) in the SIM 200 mg/rux group and 2 subjects (13.3%, 90% CI 2.4%, 36.3%) in the SIM 700 mg/rux group showed a reduction in bone marrow fibrosis score from Baseline to Week 24. In an exploratory analysis, similar numbers of subjects showed increases in bone marrow fibrosis scores. SIM treatment was not associated with meaningful improvements in hematologic parameters or reductions in MPN-SAF score or spleen size. The most frequent adverse events were those commonly associated with MF, including constitutional symptoms and reductions in hematological parameters. Conclusions: SIM treatment alone or in combination with rux is safe but does not reliably reduce bone marrow fibrosis in pts with MF. The reason for reduction of marrow fibrosis in some patients and increase in others is unclear and may be sampling variability. Clinical studies of SIM in IPF and liver fibrosis are ongoing. Disclosures Savona: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Oh:CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dong:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Thai:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gotlib:Allakos, Inc.: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Interim Results from Fight-203, a Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib (INCB054828) in Patients with Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Rearrangement of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110388 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 690-690 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽

Alessandro Rambaldi ◽

Jason R. Gotlib ◽

Adam J. Mead ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phosphate Binders ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Lymphoid Neoplasms ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms (MLNs) with rearrangement of FGFR1 on chromosome band 8p11 are rare but aggressive neoplasms characterized by heterogeneous presentation with myeloid and/or lymphoid proliferation, extramedullary involvement, and rapid progression to blast phase (Strati P, et al., Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:1672-1676). FGFR1 gets constitutively activated through fusion genes involving various partner genes, most frequently ZMYM2-FGFR1 or BCR-FGFR1 as consequence of a t(8;13)(p11;q12) or a t(8;22)(p11;q11), respectively. Chemotherapy is usually ineffective, effective targeted treatment has not been described, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) is the only potentially curative option. Pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3, has shown efficacy in patients with FGF/FGFR-activated tumors, including cholangiocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. We report interim results from the ongoing fight-203 study (NCT03011372) of pemigatinib in patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLNs. Methods: Fight-203 is a phase 2, open-label study enrolling patients ≥ 18 years of age with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. Patients enrolled in the study must have progressed on ≥ 1 prior treatment and be ineligible for alloHSCT. Patients receive a daily oral dose of pemigatinib 13.5 mg on a 21-day cycle (2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall clinical benefit rate, which includes complete clinical (CR) or partial clinical response (PR), and either complete or partial cytogenetic response (CCyR, PCyR). Secondary endpoints include duration of response/benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety/tolerability. Efficacy is assessed by evaluation of bone marrow histomorphology changes, standard cytogenetic and FISH evaluation of the FGFR1 rearrangement, and PET/CT scan. Results: At data cutoff (July 23, 2018), 14 patients were enrolled. Ten patients who had ≥ 1 response assessment were included in the analysis (Table). Patients received an average of 6.9 cycles of pemigatinib (range, 2-12 cycles). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 0-5), including 2 patients who received alloHSCT. Eight patients (80%) had a major CyR, including 6 patients with CCyR and 2 with PCyR. Eight patients (80%) had a CR or PR in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and extramedullary disease. One patient died of progression to myeloid blast crisis, 2 patients were bridged to alloHSCT, and 7 patients are ongoing. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were hyperphosphatemia (n=7 [70%]), diarrhea (n=5 [50%]) and anemia (n=5 [50%]); hyperphosphatemia was managed with diet and phosphate binders. Nine events in 4 patients (40%) were grade 3/4; 2 of these events (diarrhea and leukopenia) in 2 patients were related to pemigatinib. There were no drug-related AEs leading to dose interruption, dose reduction, or discontinuation. Conclusions: Pemigatinib showed promising efficacy, with an 80% major CyR rate accompanied by complete or partial remission, and was generally well tolerated by patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. The protocol was amended to allow continuous dosing, and the study is currently enrolling. Disclosures Verstovsek: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gotlib:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Kartos: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mead:Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Evotek: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elstar: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hernandez Boluda:Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Asatiani:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lihou:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiter:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Calreticulin Neoepitope-Directed Monoclonal Antibody Can Overcome JAK Inhibitor Resistance and Block TPO-Independent Megakaryocyte Differentation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-154332 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3597-3597

Author(s):

Denis Tvorogov ◽

Chloe AL Thompson-Peach ◽

Johannes Foßelteder ◽

Mara Dottore ◽

Frank Stomski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Liquid Culture ◽

Jak Inhibitor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Nsg Mice ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Calr Mutations ◽

Bone Marrow Engraftment

Abstract Introduction: Mutations within the gene encoding calreticulin (CALR) are the second most common genetic aberration associated with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), observed in 70% of non-JAK2 V617F cases. Importantly, patients with CALR mutations do not effectively respond to JAK inhibitor therapy and no mutation specific therapy is currently in use. Virtually all CALR mutations identified in PMF are small insertions or deletions clustered within exon 9 leading to a neo-epitope peptide sequence which is thought to directly or indirectly activate the thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) by a poorly defined mechanism. Here we engineered a neo-epitope specific monoclonal antobody that has striking biological activity against ruxolitinib persistent cells. Methods TF-1 TpoR cells expressing TpoR were supplemented with 20 ng/mL of TPO. Rats were immunised with a CALR mutant peptide coupled to KLH. Serum from the immunised rats was screened by enzyme linked immunoassay, to verify a strong titre to the peptide immunogen. Primary PMF CD34+ cells were cultured in StemCell Pro with human SCF, IL-6 and IL-9. NSG mice were used to for engraftment studies after 150 cGy irradiation. Results: We engineered a panel of rat monoclonal antibodies after immunization with a 30 amino acid peptide corresponding to the C-terminal mutant CALR neoepitope sequence with an extra cysteine residue. Clone 4D7 showed superior activity of detecting mutant but not wild type CALR protein with a binding affinity of 13.5 pM and dissociation constant of 1.53 nM as measured by I 125-Scatchard. Treatment with 4D7 resulted in a significant (5-7-fold) increase in the amount of full-length mutant CALR protein in conditioned media. 4D7 inhibited Tpo-independent cell growth over 6 days in TF-1 cells expressing MPL and mutant CALR at 2, 10 and 20 µg. 4D7 blocked constitutive factor-independent phospho-STAT5 and phospho-ERK after incubation exclusively in mutant CALR cells but not in TF-1 cells expressing TpoR alone and increased the sub-G 0 fraction was observed compared to IgG control (P = 0.001, n = 3 independent experiments) consistent with induction of an apoptotic response. We tested activity in purified primary CD34+ cells obtained from patients with CALR mutant myelofibrosis using two orthogonal assays: - (i) Tpo-independent megakaryocyte differentiation in liquid culture and (ii) Tpo-independent megakaryocyte colony formation on a collagen-based medium. 4 out of 4 patient samples that displayed robust Tpo-independent growth of CD41+CD61+ megakaryocyte progenitors showed inhibition by 4D7 of at least 50%. Similarly, we saw dramatic reduction in the absolute numbers of primary Tpo-independent megakaryocyte colonies cultured on collagen (colony-forming unit-mega) treated with 4D7 in multiple patient samples (decrease of 46%, P = 0.0001, Student's t-test, n = 4 independent patient samples) Importantly, secretion of mutant CALR protein was neither upregulated nor downregulated by ruxolitinib, indicating ruxolitinib is unlikely to alter mutant CALR trafficking in patients. 4D7 had strong inhibitory activity on cells that were resistant to ruxolitinib, in both liquid culture at 96 hours or colony formation. To test whether 4D7 could block mutant CALR-dependent proliferation in vivo, we developed two distinct xenograft models, a bone marrow engraftment model, which measures mutant CALR dependent proliferation in the bone marrow microenvironment, and a chloroma model, which mimics extravascular infiltration of mutant CALR leukaemia, by injection of TPO-independent TF-1 cells in NSG mice. In the bone marrow engraftment model 4D7 treatment (12 mg/kg twice weekly via intraperitoneal injection) lowered peripheral blood engraftment of human CD33 myeloid cells at 3 weeks, bone marrow engraftment and significantly prolonged survival compared to IgG control (P=0.004, HR=0.2). In the chloroma model, 4D7 treatment resulted in significant decrease in tumour growth measured at 3 weeks (P<0.01) and improved overall survival (P=0.02, HR=0.07) compared to IgG control Conclusion: Together, these results suggest an immunotherapeutic approach may have clinical utility CALR-driven myeloproliferative neoplasms and CALR mutant acute myeloid leukaemia, as well as activity in CALR mutant patients that develop resistance/persistence to ruxolitinib. Disclosures Ross: Bristol Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Keros Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Reinisch: Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

The MP0250-CP201 Mirror Study: A Phase 2 Study Update of MP0250 Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Previously Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129827 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1899-1899 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Norbert Grząśko ◽

Stefan Knop ◽

Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽

Marc S Raab ◽

Jan Dürig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Proteasome Inhibitors ◽

Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Background Bone marrow neovascularization is a hallmark of multiple myeloma and progression is associated with a substantial increase in pro-angiogenic factors that promote bone marrow angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). At present, anti-angiogenic agents are not part of treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, neither alone nor in combination with approved agents. MP0250 is a first-in-class, tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-A and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase plasma half-life. This is a report on early safety and efficacy of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vd) in RRMM patients that have previously been exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM (MiRRoR, NCT03136653). Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarkers for HGF and cMET in bone marrow biopsies are detected by IHC; MM specific markers, circulating HGF and VEGF levels are measured using patient plasma samples. Results As of 01 July 2019, 20 patients (7 ongoing) received a total of 137 doses (1-33 cycles) of MP0250 at the maximum tolerated dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Vd. Median age was 61 years (46-76), median time since diagnosis was 6.7 years. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-9). All 20 patients had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 9 patients received PI-based regimens as their immediate prior line of therapy before start of MP0250 + Vd. Importantly, 6 out of these 9 patients achieved responses ≥ Partial Response (PR). Treatment had been discontinued in 40% of patients due to PD, 15% due to Adverse Event (AE), 5% due to physician's decision and in 1 case at patient's request. The most frequent drug-related grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension in 7/1 patients, thrombocytopenia in 4/1 patients, grade 3 proteinuria in 4 patients and grade 3 anemia in 4 patients. There were no infusion-related reactions. No treatment-related deaths were reported. 20 patients received ≥ 1 dose of MP0250 + Vd and had at least 1 assessment of response and were included in the efficacy analysis. 1 patient (5%) achieved Complete Response, 4 patients achieved Very Good Partial Response (20%) and 3 patients achieved PR (15%) for an ORR of 40%. DOR at cutoff date is 6 months (range, 2-21). Pharmacokinetic data show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days (range, 6-17). No indication of ADA-mediated drug clearance was observed. Summary Combining MP250 at 8 mg/kg with standard doses of bortezomib and dexamethasone was generally well tolerated with discontinuation due to AE in only 15% of patients. No unexpected toxicity was observed and AEs consistent with the toxicity profile of the individual agents. Analysis of the preliminary efficacy results showed an encouraging ORR of 40%. Recruitment to this Phase 2 study is ongoing. Disclosures Knop: Janssen, AMGEN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dürig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel or accommodations, Speakers Bureau. Bringhen:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gamberi:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lang:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

Download Full-text

Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Impact of Intermediate-Risk Vs High-Risk Cytogenetics on Patient Outcomes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.955.955 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 955-955 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lisa Pleyer ◽

Sonja Burgstaller ◽

Reinhard Stauder ◽

Michael Girschikofsky ◽

Werner Linkesch ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bone Marrow Blasts ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Several studies, including retrospective analyses of patient registries1,2 and a subanalysis of the phase III MDS-AZA-001 trial3 suggest that poor-risk cytogenetics negatively impact overall survival (OS) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and World Health Organization (WHO)-defined acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with azacitidine (AZA). There are few data available to indicate whether AZA has improved clinical activity vs conventional care in AML patients with adverse cytogenetics. However, in a subanalysis of MDS-AZA-001 (MDS and AML [20–30% bone marrow blasts]) patients with –7/–7q abnormalities had better OS with AZA than low-dose cytarabine (21.4 vs 3.5 months, respectively) supporting significant activity of AZA in patients with adverse cytogenetics.4 Methods In this retrospective study of the Austrian AZA Registry (N=346), we compared patients with WHO-AML and intermediate- (n=228) vs high-risk (n=74) cytogenetics according to Medical Research Council (MRC) criteria. Outcomes were also assessed with respect to AZA treatment line. Results The intermediate-risk cytogenetics group comprised 228 patients (AZA 1st line, n=109; AZA ≥2nd line, n=119), and the high-risk cytogenetics group comprised 74 patients (AZA 1st line, n=39; AZA ≥2nd line, n=35; Figure 1). Comparison of baseline characteristics of both groups revealed significant differences with regard to prevalence of males and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) >2 for patients with high-risk cytogenetics receiving AZA 1st line, but not in those receiving AZA ≥2nd line. Peripheral blood blasts were present in a significantly larger proportion of high- than intermediate-risk patients (Figure 1). In patients who received AZA 1st line, median number of AZA cycles was 6 for both the intermediate- and high-risk cytogenetic groups (range: 1–46 and 1–25, respectively). Median time from diagnosis to AZA start was <1 month for AZA 1st line and >7.6 months for AZA ≥2nd line. Median time from AZA stop to death was <2 months in all cohorts. In the whole cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) according to International Working Group (IWG) 2003 criteria5 was similar for patients with intermediate- and high-risk cytogenetics (complete response [CR] + CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi] + partial response [PR]: 32.0 vs 20.3%; p=0.106; Figure 1). Rates of hematologic improvement (HI) according to IWG 2006 criteria6 were also not significantly different (54.4 vs 75.6; p=0.063), and when ORR and HI were combined, the difference remained non-significant (47.4 vs 46.0%; p=0.885; Figure 1). Median OS was consistently higher in patients with intermediate- than high-risk cytogenetics (9.8 vs 5.4 months for the total cohort; p=0.046 [Figures 1 and 2a]; 13.5 vs 9.5 months for AZA 1st line [not significant]; and 7.6 vs 3.5 months for AZA ≥2nd line; p=0.005 [Figure 1]). However, median OS for responding patients (CR/CRi/PR/HI) was similar for patients with intermediate- and high-risk cytogenetics, irrespective of treatment line (19.9 vs 19.3 months for all responders; 20.5 vs 21.7 months for AZA 1st line; and 18.5 vs 15.0 months for AZA ≥2nd line). Furthermore, presence of a monosomal karyotype had a significant negative impact on OS (Figure 2b). None of the baseline factors analyzed had an impact on OS in patient subgroups with intermediate- or high-risk cytogenetics, except number of comorbidities >3. Conclusions Here, we compared outcomes of 302 WHO-AML patients with intermediate- vs high-risk cytogenetics treated with AZA. In line with recent data of MDS patients,1 baseline cytogenetics did not seem to have a significant effect on response to AZA. However, in agreement with other studies of AZA in MDS/WHO-AML patients,1–3 high-risk cytogenetics had a negative impact on survival compared with intermediate-risk cytogenetics in WHO-AML treated with AZA. 1. Sebert M, et al. Oral presentation at ASH 2013. Abstract 389 2. Thepot S, et al. Am J Hematol 2014;89:410–6 3. Fenaux P, et al. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:562–9 4. Fenaux P, et al. Br J Haematol 2010;149:244–9 5. Cheson BD, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4642–9 6. Cheson BD, et al. Blood 2006;108:419–25 Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Pleyer: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Vidaza (azacitidine) is indicated for the treatment of adult AML patients who are not eligible for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with 20–30 % blasts and multi-lineage dysplasia, according to WHO classification. This cohort also includes AML-patients with >30% bone marrow blasts.. Burgstaller:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Stauder:Novartis: Research Funding; Ratiopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Girschikofsky:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pfeilstöcker:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lang:Celgene: Consultancy. Sperr:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Phadia: Research Funding. Valent:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Greil:Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Research Funding; Ratiopharm: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Improving Risk Assessment of AML with a Precision Genomic Strategy to Assess Mutation Clearance

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114979 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5277-5277

Author(s):

Meagan Jacoby ◽

David H Spencer ◽

Emma Hughes ◽

Robert S Fulton ◽

Michelle O'Laughlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Time Frame ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Post Induction ◽

Flow Cytometric ◽

Risk Patients

Abstract The persistence of leukemic mutation(s) in AML patients who have achieved a morphologic complete remission (CR) after intensive induction chemotherapy is a strong predictor of early relapse and reduced overall survival (OS) (Klco JAMA, 2015; Morita, J Clin Oncol 2018; Jongen-Lavrencic, NEJM, 2018). There is no clinical consensus as to the optimal consolidation therapy for the ~50% of patients with intermediate-risk AML. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) for patients ≤60 years with ELN intermediate-risk disease is 0.8 years to 1.2 years, with a median OS of 1.2-2.1 years (Mrozek, J Clin Oncol, 2012). We have shown that intermediate-risk patients who clear all leukemia-associated mutations (LAMs) to a variant allele fraction (VAF) of <2.5% in first morphologic CR have a median event-free survival of 25.6 months, vs 8.8 months if they do not (HR 3.32). Median overall survival is 46.8 months if all LAMs are cleared, vs 19.3 months if they are not (HR 2.88). We hypothesized that improved post-remission risk stratification using LAM clearance can further refine risk assessment and optimize alloHCT decisions by identifying patients at lower risk of relapse, who might be expected to do well with standard chemotherapy. Here, we report the development of a pipeline to prospectively determine the persistence of LAMs after remission-induction, and return results in a clinically actionable time-frame. We perform enhanced exome sequencing (EES) of paired skin or buccal swab (normal tissue) and bone marrow DNA to comprehensively identify all LAMs at diagnosis (Day 0) and to assess their clearance post-induction (~Day 30). EES data are generated using a CLIA-compliant assay in the CLIA-licensed environment (CLE) lab at the McDonnell Genome Institute, and results are returned to the treating physician. Intermediate risk patients ≤60 years with clearance of all LAMs (VAFs <2.5%) are assigned to receive consolidation with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) (Cohort A). Patients with persistence of any mutation at a VAF ≥ 2.5% are assigned to the investigator's choice arm, and are treated with HiDAC and/or alloHCT at the discretion of the treating physician (Cohort B). This stratification is part of an ongoing clinical protocol (NCT02756962) whose primary objective is to determine whether the RFS of patients who have cleared all LAM(s) post-induction (VAFs <2.5%) and are treated with HiDAC alone (Cohort A) is significantly higher than expected from a historical intermediate risk group. Measurable residual disease testing by "difference from normal" flow cytometry (lower level of detection of 0.02%, Hematologics, Seattle WA) post-induction will be correlated with clearance or persistence of mutations and clinical outcomes. For the 23 patients sequenced to date, the mean turnaround time to issue sequencing results to the treating physician was 24 days from the time of the remission biopsy. All 23 patients had detectable LAMs at presentation (mean 28 per patient, range, 6 to 43) that could be used to track persistent disease in the day 30 remission sample. Eleven patients (48%) cleared all LAMs and received HiDAC only (Cohort A). There was no flow cytometric evidence of residual AML in Cohort A. Twelve patients (52%) had persistent LAMs (Cohort B, investigator's choice). The number of persistent leukemia-associated variants present in Cohort B ranged between 1 and 14. Surprisingly, 9 of the 12 patients with persistent LAMs by sequencing had no flow cytometric evidence of residual leukemia. Seven of 12 patients on the investigator's choice arm have received an alloHCT, and none have relapsed to date. The median follow-up for all subjects is 378 days (range, 59-683). Neither the median RFS (Fig. 1A) nor the median OS (Fig. 1B) has been reached for either cohort. While preliminary, these results suggest that patients who clear all LAMs to a VAF of <2.5% may have durable responses with HiDAC alone. The encouraging RFS seen in the investigator's choice arm (Cohort B) may reflect the decision to recommend transplant "upfront" in CR1 for patients who have molecular persistent disease. In summary, identifying persistent LAMs after induction chemotherapy is feasible in an actionable time-frame. Early data suggest that using LAM clearance post-induction may improve current risk-stratification for intermediate-risk AML. Accrual of patients and continued follow-up are ongoing. Disclosures Jacoby: NovoNordisk: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Loken:Hematologics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schroeder:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Uy:GlycoMimetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy. Vij:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kahl:Gilead: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Decreased Expression of CD62L and CD54 Correlates with Poor Cytogenetic Risk Group In Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2915.2915 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2915-2915

Author(s):

Canan Alhan ◽

Theresia M. Westers ◽

Claudia Cali ◽

Floortje L. Kessler ◽

Monique Terwijn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

Healthy Volunteers ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Risk Category ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells

Abstract Abstract 2915 Interactions in the bone marrow (BM) between haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) and the BM micro environment are important for the regulation of cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and survival. Expression of both CD62L (L-selectin) and CD54 (ICAM-1) on HPC demonstrated to play a role in signal transduction routes for proliferation and growth regulation. Especially CD54 is involved in uncontrolled proliferation and block of apoptosis. Previously, it was described that decreased expression of CD62L in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was associated with a poor cytogenetic risk profile and an adverse clinical outcome (Graf M et al, Eur J Haematol 2003) Myelodysplastic syndromes are a group of clonal HPC disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and a propensity to evolve into AML. The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) provides information on both survival and risk of development of an AML. The purpose of our study was to evaluate CD62L and CD54 expression on CD34+ cells in MDS patients by flow cytometry and to assess the value of a CD62L/CD54 ratio for prognostication. Bone marrow samples of 30 newly diagnosed MDS patients (3 RA(RS)/18 RCMD(RS), the <5% blasts group; 5 RAEB-1, 4 RAEB-2, the >5% blasts group), 16 AML patients with prior MDS and 26 healthy volunteers were analyzed for CD62L and CD54 expression on CD34+ cells by using flow cytometry. An adhesion index was calculated as a ratio of the percentage and MFI of CD62L and CD54 positive cells (as was reported by Buccisano et al, Eur J Haematol 2007). The CD62L/CD54 ratio was significantly decreased in MDS with <5% blasts (median 79.09 p<0.0001) as compared to healthy volunteers (median 480.4) and even more decreased in high risk MDS (median 14.67 p<0.0001 and p=0.001 as compared to healthy volunteers and MDS with <5% blasts, respectively) and AML with prior MDS (median 12.54, p<0.0001 and p=0.009 as compared to healthy volunteers and MDS with <5% blasts, respectively). The MDS patients were assigned to the good, intermediate or poor IPSS cytogenetic risk category. Cytogenetics was available for 22 MDS patients. The CD62L/CD54 ratio was significantly lower in the cytogenetic poor risk category compared with the good risk category (median 5.4 and median 70.79 respectively, p=0.018). Moreover, a low CD62L/CD54 ratio correlated significantly with poor cytogenetics, p=0.006. In the group of MDS patients with <5% blasts, 4 developed a refractory anemia with excess of blasts or AML within a follow up period of 12 months. There was a trend for a lower CD62L/CD54 ratio for MDS patients who developed an AML compared with patients who did not. In conclusion, the CD62L/CD54 ratio is significantly decreased in MDS compared with healthy volunteers and even more decreased in AML with prior MDS. Both CD62L and CD54 are involved in regulation of proliferation and apoptosis of the HPC. A decreased adhesion ratio in low risk MDS patients might reflect HPC damage at an early stage of the disease with an increased proliferative capacity and a decreased apoptotic profile. Interestingly, a low CD62L/CD54 ratio showed a significant inverse correlation with the IPSS cytogenetic risk category. Due to an absence of metaphases in a proportion of MDS patients, cytogenetics is not always available. The CD62L/CD54 ratio might serve as a surrogate marker for poor prognosis cytogenetics in case no karyotype is available. Low risk MDS patients who developed an AML within 12 months tended to have a lower CD62L/CD54 ratio. Although these results are promising, sample size and follow up period needs to be extended. The CD62L/CD54 ratio might add to prognostication of MDS patients and might identify MDS patients with <5% blasts who are at risk for development of an AML. Disclosures: Ossenkoppele: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Van de Loosdrecht:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell (BM-MSC) Release Microvesicles/Exosomes That Incorporate Into Hematopoietic Cells From MDS Patients and May Modify Their Behaviour

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.863.863 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 863-863 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sandra Muntión ◽

Post Doc Fellowship ◽

Teresa Ramos ◽

Bruno Paiva ◽

Beatriz Roson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

De Novo ◽

Annexin V ◽

Micro Rna ◽

Bioactive Molecules ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Micro Rnas ◽

Cd34 Cells

Abstract A new mechanism of intercellular communication has been proposed consisting in the secretion of exosomes/ microvesicles (MVs). Such mechanism has been shown to modify the functional properties of recipient cells by the transfer of proteins, mRNA, or micro-RNAs. The hypothesis of the present work was that MSC from MDS patients could differentially modify the HPC properties throughout the shedding of MVs when compared with those from controls due to their different content. Material and methods: MVs were isolated from MSC from bone marrow (BM) samples 18 patients diagnosed with ‘de novo’ and untreated low risk MDS and from MSC from 12 healthy BM. BM-MSC at third passage were cultured in DMEM deprived of FCS, and supernatants were collected after 6 or 24 hours. MVs purification was performed in the majority of the experiments (16 MDS/ 9 Controls) using the ExoQuick-TC exosome precipitation solution (ExoQuick; System Biosiences). To confirm the isolation of MVs by exosome precipitation solution, in some cases (2 MDS/3 Controls) the MVs were obtained by ultracentrifugation; MVs identification was done by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as well as by flow cytometry (FC). To evaluate if the micro-RNA content into MSC-MVs from patients and controls was different, expression analysis of miRNAs was done using Megaplex™ RT Primers pool (Applied Biosystems) and 384-well microfluidic cards (TaqMan® MicroRNA Array A) were loaded with retro-transcription product and PCR runs were performed on a 7900HT Fast Real-time PCR system (eight MVs from MDS and 4 from HD).To demonstrate the incorporation of MVs from MSC into human hematopoietic progenitors (HPC: CD34+ cells obtained by immunomagnetic selection) HPC were co-cultured with MVs from MSC. Incorporation of Vybrant Dil-labelled MVs into HPC was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h. by FC. To detect the incorporation of MVs by confocal microscopy (CM) an intracellular primary Ab for CD90 (Santa Cruz, Biotechnology) was used as MVs marker and anti-CD45 to detect HPC. A Zeiss LSM 510 CM connected to a digital camera (Leica DC 100) were used to obtain confocal images. Apoptotic rate of CD34+ cells that had the MVs-MSC from MDS and controls were evaluated by FC by using APC H7 Annexin V DY634 (Immunostep) and 7AAD (BD Biosciences). Results: More than 95% of MVs isolated by ExoKit system from supernatants of cultured MSC from 6 HD and 6 MDS patients showed scatter intensities lower than of 6µm beads. We observed, in all cases, the same FC pattern. Also, MVs/exosomes isolated by ultracentrifugation (3 MDS/ 5 HD) showed the same FC pattern. MVs from MDS and controls isolated by ultracentrifugation were identified by TEM (fig1). When co-cultures of CD34+ HPC and MVs were studied in both HD and MDS, MVs were incorporated into HPC in all cases (fig2). When the content of miRNAS in the MVs from MDS and HD were compared significant differences were observed between both groups. Twenty-one out of 384 evaluated miRNAs were over-expressed in the MVs from patients compared with the controls. To confirm these results, the expression of miR10a and miR-132 was analyzed by RT-PCR. In both cases their expression was significantly increased in MVs from patients. Recently, it has been suggested that the cargo of these structures are bioactive molecules, therefore we explored the possibility that MVs could modify the behavior of the target cell. For this purpose we searched in which pathways the overexpressed miRNAs could be involved and apoptosis was among them. Since it is considered a very important process in MDS pathophysiology we compared apoptosis by FC, after co-culturing CD34+ cells with MVs from MSC of MDS and HD. Interestingly, preliminary results show that the MVs from MDS protected better from apoptosis CD34+ cells than MVs obtained from controls. In summary, in the present study we show that BM-MSC produce MVs/exosomes with different microRNAs content according to their origin, MDS or HD. These structures can be incorporated into HPC and can modify their properties. Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III. PI12/01775. Junta de Castilla y León.GRS 873/A/13. Portuguese FST Grant. SFRH/BD/86451/2012 Disclosures: Diez-Campelo: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. San Miguel:Jansen, Celgene, Onyx, Novartis, Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. del Cañizo:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen-Cilag: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Arry: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text