CXCL8/CXCR2 signaling mediates bone marrow fibrosis and represents a therapeutic target in myelofibrosis

Pro-inflammatory signaling is a hallmark feature of human cancer, including in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), most notably myelofibrosis (MF). Dysregulated inflammatory signaling contributes to fibrotic progression in MF; however, the individual cytokine mediators elicited by malignant MPN cells to promote collagen-producing fibrosis and disease evolution remain yet to be fully elucidated. Previously we identified a critical role for combined constitutive JAK/STAT and aberrant NF-kB pro-inflammatory signaling in myelofibrosis development. Using single-cell transcriptional and cytokine-secretion studies of primary MF patient cells and two separate murine models of myelofibrosis, we extend this previous work and delineate the role of CXCL8/CXCR2 signaling in MF pathogenesis and bone marrow fibrosis progression. MF patient hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells are enriched in a CXCL8/CXCR2 gene signature and display dose- dependent proliferation and fitness in response to exogenous CXCL8 ligand in vitro. Genetic deletion of Cxcr2 in the hMPLW515L adoptive transfer model abrogates fibrosis and extends overall survival, and pharmacologic inhibition of the CXCR1/2 pathway improves hematologic parameters, attenuates bone marrow fibrosis, and synergizes with JAK inhibitor therapy. Our mechanistic insights provide a rationale for therapeutic targeting of the CXCL8/CXCR2 pathway in MF patients at risk for continued fibrotic progression.

Disseminated tuberculosis with myelofibrosis presentation: a case report

Background Primary myelofibrosis is a rare myeloproliferative disorder in middle-aged and old adults and should be distinguished from secondary and reactive causes of bone marrow fibrosis because, in reactive fibrosis, treatment approaches depend on the underlying etiology. Case presentation Here we report the case of a middle-aged Iranian man who was diagnosed and treated as primary myelofibrosis at presentation, and whose final diagnosis was disseminated tuberculosis with reactive bone marrow fibrosis. Conclusions It is prudent to evaluate the potential causes of myelofibrosis in any patient with the diagnosis primary myelofibrosis. Tuberculosis can be an important etiology of bone marrow fibrosis, especially in endemic areas.

Efficacy and Safety of Extended Use of Romiplostim Treatment for Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Background: Chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is common, adversely impacts chemotherapy relative dose intensity, and may adversely impact cancer control. There is no approved therapy for CIT. In our recent phase II study of solid tumor patients with CIT (Soff et al, J. Clin. Onc., 2019), romiplostim lead to correction of platelet counts in 85% of participants within 3 weeks. While on romiplostim maintenance, only 6.8% of participants experienced chemotherapy dose reduction or delay as a result of recurrent CIT within a minimum of two cycles of chemotherapy or 8 weeks. However, there is a lack of long-term data on the efficacy and safety of romiplostim in CIT. Objectives: This is an extension analysis of the phase II study for patients receiving romiplostim maintenance for 12 months or longer. Patients/Methods: In the phase II study, 44 patients successfully met the primary endpoint of correction of their platelet count within 3 weeks and resumed chemotherapy with romiplostim maintenance. 21 patients (48%) remained on romiplostim for 12 months or longer. Data were collected from one month prior to initiation of romiplostim to one month after the last dose of drug. Data extracted included complete blood count, chemotherapy doses and dates, romiplostim doses and dates, body weight, cancer diagnosis, age, gender, date of death and thrombotic events. Efficacy was demonstrated by persistent maintenance of platelet counts during long-term chemotherapy and avoidance of episodes of reduced chemotherapy dose intensity. Safety was assessed by two methods: tracking the rates of venous or arterial thrombosis; as well as development of marrow fibrosis and/or secondary hematologic malignancy. The mean romiplostim doses and lab values are calculated by month of study participation. Results: All participants had metastatic disease. Breast (N=6) and colorectal (N=6) were the most common cancers. No participant discontinued romiplostim therapy due to an adverse event or futility. One patient received romiplostim at our institution, but chemotherapy at an outside hospital; details of his chemotherapy were not available for this analysis. 14 of the 20 (70%) of the analyzable participants experienced no episode of CIT; 4 subjects experienced a single chemotherapy dose delay due CIT. No patient experienced multiple delays in chemotherapy due to CIT. Two patients required a chemotherapy dose reduction. The mean monthly platelet counts remained controlled throughout the period of analysis. (Figure 1A). The mean romiplostim doses were in the range of 3-5 mcg/kg through 35 months. There were insufficient participants beyond month 36 to allow meaningful interpretation of platelet counts or mean romiplostim doses. There was no evidence of adverse impact on absolute neutrophil count or hemoglobin levels (Figure 1B). No patient developed leukoerythroblastic changes indicative of marrow fibrosis, and no cases of secondary hematologic malignancy were identified. Two participants experienced thrombosis. One individual experienced a deep vein thrombosis. A second participant with an established history of congenital thrombophilia, experienced multiple tumor associated infarctions. The thrombotic events did not lead to discontinuation of participation in the trial for either participant. Of the 44 patients in the phase 2 study who resumed chemotherapy, 21 were alive at 12 months (48%) and 12 were alive at 24 months (27%). Conclusions: In this long-term analysis, romiplostim was effective and safe in the treatment of CIT with no evidence of drug resistance, marrow fibrosis, or secondary hematologic malignancy. The rates of thrombosis were no higher than expected for this patient demographic. There are some limitations to our analysis which includes our inability to accurately capture non-parenteral chemotherapy (oral or investigational agents) which were excluded from our analysis. We are unable to assess an impact on overall survival or cancer progression. However, the fact that half the participants were alive at 12 months and a quarter at 24 months is a reassuring signal. The analysis also is limited to the patients who were eligible for the initial phase 2 trial and corrected their platelet count within 3 weeks. Within these limitations, the extension study provides reassurance for long-term efficacy and safety of romiplostim treatment for CIT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Romiplostim is approved to increase platelet counts in ITP and pre-surgery. We are describing the results of a clinical trial.

Spleen Stiffness By Magnetic Resonance Elastography or Ultrasound Elastography As a Surrogate Marker of Bone Marrow Fibrosis in Myelofibrosis Patients

Introduction Primary myelofibrosis (PM) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterised by bone marrow fibrosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Both clinical findings and laboratory parameters are used for prognostic scores in Myelofibrosis patients. In addition, the degree of bone marrow fibrosis has an important prognostic value and has correlation with overall survival. Recently, bone marrow fibrosis was correlated with degree of splenic stiffness (SS) measured by imaging elastography techniques. 1,2 Despite these findings, there were patients with insignificant measures that could not be classified according to marrow fibrosis. In order to advance knowledge in this field, we studied splenic and hepatic stiffness (HS) in patients with myelofibrosis using elastography by two methods, ultrasonography (EUS) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and its correlation with prognostic scores and bone marrow fibrosis. Study Design and Methods This is a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study in patients from the outpatient clinic for myeloproliferative neoplasms who had given informed consent according to procedures approved by institution´s ethical committee. Patients with PM, as well as post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) or post-polycythemia vera (PV) myelofibrosis, were included in this study. Myelofibrosis patients with diagnosis of other associated pathologies that may alter SS, as portal hypertension or cirrhosis, were excluded from the study. Patients were assessed for splenic stiffness measured by ultrasound conducted by two examiners, with more than 10 years of experience. EUS was performed in US Epiq 7 equipment - Philips - with ARFI elastometry methodology. The SS measurements was reported in m/s. In addition, they were also evaluated for splenic and liver stiffness by MRI technique. All exams were performed in 1.5 T MR equipment (Magneton Aera, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) and the MRI protocol included T2-weighted and gradient-echo MRE sequences using steady-state 60-Hz excitation and an external driver placed on the right side and, on the left side of the abdomen. The measures of SS were also obtained by two experienced examiners Results At this moment we present the results of 16 patients with myelofibrosis (PM: 8 cases; post-PV myelofibrosis: 2 cases; post-ET myelofibrosis: 6 cases). The median age was 69y (41-88y) and 62,5% of participants were male. The JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 9 cases; three cases were CALR positive, and three cases were triple negative. The CBC showed: Hb: 10.9 g/dL (6.5-18.7); WBC (x10 9/L): 9.17 (1.8-44.5) and platelets (x10 9/L): 393 (10-957). Our preliminary results show that bone marrow fibrosis increased according to splenic stiffness by EUS and MRE (Figure 1a; table 1). Patients with osteosclerosis also presented a higher SS by MRE (Figure 1b). We could not find correlation of splenic stiffness with prognostic score DIPSS plus, although Int-2/High risk patients presented a trend to be associated with higher liver stiffness. Conclusion To the moment, our preliminary findings suggest a correlation between SS and degree of bone marrow fibrosis and osteosclerosis, though the correlation between both measures and prognostic scores is still to be determined. We expect to have a better definition for all correlations, as we progress through the assessment of the other patients in our service. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Spleen and Liver Fibrosis Is Associated to Treatment Response and Prognosis in Philadelphia-Negative Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Introduction: Spleen and liver stiffness, investigated by transient elastography (TE), have been associated with marrow fibrosis in patients (pts) with Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) (Iurlo et al, Br J Haematol. 2015; Webb et al, Ultrasound Q. 2015). Morover, spleen stiffness was found to be greater in Myelofibrosis (MF) and Polycythemia Vera (PV) compared to Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) (Benedetti et al, J Clin Med. 2020). Tissue stiffness can be assessed by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE), the two most common techniques being point SWE (pSWE) and bidimensional SWE (2D.SWE). Aims: The aims of this study are: 1) to identify TE differences between MPN pts and healthy volunteers (HV); 2) to evaluate specific TE features in pts with MF, PV and ET; 3) to assess whether spleen/liver stiffness may identify clinical-laboratory features associated with prognosis in MPNs Methods: In this monocentric study, MPN pts and HV received elastometric evaluation of spleen and liver stiffness by pSWE and 2D.SWE with an Esaote MyLab™9 ultrasound system. Spleen area, portal (PVD) and splenic vein diameter (SVD) were measured. Results: A total of 220 pts were included in this study: 142 (64.5%) MPN and 78 (35.5%) HV. MPN pts were affected by MF (63, 44.4%: 39 primary MF), PV (33, 23.2%) or ET (46, 32.4%). Compared to HV, MPN pts had greater median spleen maximal cross sectional area (79 vs 38 cm2, p<0.001), greater spleen stiffness (pSWE 31.3 vs 23.7 kPa, p<0.001; 2D.SWE 25.2 vs 18.7 kPa, p<0.001), and greater liver stiffness (pSWE 6.0 vs 4.9 kPa, p<0.001; 2D.SWE 5.4 vs 4.7 kPa, p<0.001). Additionally, PVD and SVD were significantly larger in MPNs than in HV (PVD 10.9 vs 9.2 mm, p<0.001; SVD 8 vs 6.3 mm, p<0.001). Comparing each MPN to HV, only MF retained all the significant differences; conversely, liver stiffness and PVD were comparable between ET/PV and HV. Clinical and laboratory features of MPN pts are shown in Tab 1. Compared to PV and ET pts, MF pts had higher spleen (p<0.001) and liver stiffness (p<0.001), larger PVD (p<0.001) and SVD (p<0.001). Conversely, ET and PV displayed comparable TE values. Notably, higher median spleen area (p<0.001), larger SVD (p=0.03) and PVD (p=0.02), higher liver (pSWE/2D.SWE, p<0.001/p=0.002) and spleen stiffness (pSWE/2D.SWE, p=0.01/p=0.001) were associated with increased marrow fibrosis grade. Grade 0-1 marrow fibrosis was present in 15 MF, 17 PV and 34 ET pts. Considering only these 66 MPN pts, spleen (40.8 vs 31.3/25.6 in PV/ET, p=0.006) and liver (6.5 vs 5.6/4.7 in PV/ET, p=0.01) stiffness was significantly higher in MF pts. Notably, increased spleen fibrosis was significantly associated with thrombotic history (32.2 vs 24.3 kPa in pts without previous thrombosis, p=0.02). Also, MPN pts with splanchnic vein thrombosis had higher spleen (pSWE: p<0.001; 2D.SWE: p<0.001) and liver stiffness (pSWE: p <0.001), and increased PVD (p=0.02) and spleen area (p=0003). In MF pts, TE data did not correlate with DIPSS risk category. However, a higher spleen stiffness (pSWE/2D.SWE, p=0.09/ p=0.03), liver stiffness (pSWE/2D.SWE, p=0.001/p=0.01), PVD (p=0.002), and SVD (p=0.01) were associated with larger spleen length by palpation. Also, a reduced SVD was associated with the presence of ≥1 high molecular risk mutation (HMR) (p=0.04). As expected, MF pts treated with JAK-inhibitors showed larger spleen area (143.8 vs 83.7 cm 2, p=0.01) and higher spleen stiffness (34.3 vs 24 kPa, p=0.01) compared to pts under cytoreductive therapy. However, pts in spleen response at the time of TE had lower median SVD/PVD (p=0.05/p=0.07) and reduced spleen stiffness (sSWE/2D.SWE: 31.5/25.9 vs 39.0/32.8 in non-responders, p=0.01/p=0.04) In ET/PV, TE data were comparable in pts with/without a complete hematological response. However, IFN was associated with enlarged spleen area and stiffness compared to cytoreduction. Conclusions: TE evaluation effectively distinguishes MF pts from HV and ET/PV, while ET/PV show relevant similarities to each other and to HV. TE data were significantly associated with prognostically relevant features including marrow fibrosis and history of thrombosis in all MPNs, and presence of large splenomegaly and HMR in MF. Finally, TE data were significantly associated with spleen response in MF. Overall, spleen/liver stiffness may help in correct MPN diagnosis, and may provide clinical guidance, being associated with known prognostic factors and treatment outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cavo: Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau. Piscaglia: ESAOTE: Research Funding. Palandri: CTI: Consultancy; AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

IL-1 Signaling Promotes Clonal Expansion and Progression of Bone Marrow Fibrosis in JAK2V617F-Induced Myeloproliferative Neoplasm

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell derived myeloid malignancies characterized by aberrant production of myeloid, erythroid or megakaryocytic lineage cells. JAK2V617F is the most common somatic driver mutation associated with MPN. Interestingly, JAK2V617F mutation can also be detected in healthy individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) who do not exhibit overt changes in blood counts. This suggests that other factors might be involved in association with JAK2 mutation in clonal expansion and initiation/progression of MPN. Chronic inflammation is frequently associated with MPN. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) is a major regulator of inflammation. IL-1 consists of two related cytokines IL-1α and IL-1β. Both IL-1α and IL-1β bind to the IL-1 receptor 1 (IL-1R1) to initiate downstream signaling. Although elevated expression of IL-1α and IL-1β has been observed in MPN, their role in the pathogenesis of MPN has remained elusive. In this study, we investigated the role of IL-1 signaling in JAK2V617F-induced MPN using a Jak2V617F knock-in mouse model. We observed elevated levels of IL-1α and IL-1β in mice expressing heterozygous (Jak2 VF/+) and homozygous Jak2V617F (Jak2 VF/VF) compared with WT control animals. Notably, IL-1α and IL-1β expression was significantly higher in Jak2 VF/VF mice exhibiting extensive bone marrow (BM) fibrosis compared with Jak2 VF/+ mice exhibiting polycythemia vera (PV), consistent with elevated levels of IL-1 in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Since both IL-1α and IL-1β levels were elevated in Jak2 VF/VF mice exhibiting MF, we utilized conditional IL-1R1 knockout (IL-1R1cKO) and Jak2 VF/VF mice to assess the role of IL-1 signaling in the initiation/progression of MF. As expected, Jak2 VF/VF mice exhibited a significant increase in WBC, neutrophil and platelet counts compared to WT control mice. Deletion of IL-1R1in Jak2 VF/VF mice (IL-1R1cKO; Jak2 VF/VF) significantly reduced the WBC, neutrophil and platelet counts to almost control levels. Flow cytometric analysis also showed a significant reduction of myeloid (Gr-1 +) and megakaryocytic (CD41 +) precursors in the BM and spleens of IL-1R1cKO; Jak2 VF/VF mice compared to Jak2 VF/VF mice. Moreover, deletion of IL-1R1 significantly reduced hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) in the BM of IL-1R1cKO; Jak2 VF/VF mice compared to Jak2 VF/VF mice. Spleen weight was significantly reduced in IL-1R1cKO; Jak2 VF/VF mice compared with Jak2 VF/VF mice and they were comparable to control WT mice. More importantly, deletion of IL-1R1 markedly reduced BM fibrosis in Jak2 VF/VF mice. These data suggest an important role of IL-1 signaling in the progression of BM fibrosis in Jak2V617F-induced MPN. To test whether IL-1 signaling contributes to clonal expansion of JAK2 mutant HSPC, we performed competitive transplantation assays by mixing Mx1Cre; Jak2 VF/+ and Mx1Cre; IL-1R1 F/F; Jak2 VF/+ mice BM cells with CD45.1 + WT mice BM cells at a ratio of 1:1 and transplanted into lethally irradiated CD45.1 + recipient animals. At 4 weeks after BMT, the recipient animals were injected with pI-pC to induce Jak2V617F expression and IL-1R1 deletion. We observed significantly higher percentages of total CD45.2 + cells as well as CD45.2 + myeloid (Gr-1 +), B- and T-cells in the peripheral blood of chimeric mice receiving Jak2 VF/+ BM compared with chimeric mice receiving IL-1R1cKO; Jak2 VF/+ BM. We also observed significantly reduced percentages of CD45.2 + LSK, LK, Gr-1 + and CD41 + cells in the BM of chimeric recipient animals receiving IL-1R1cKO; Jak2 VF/+ BM compared with Jak2 VF/+ BM. These results suggest a role of IL-1 signaling in clonal expansion of Jak2V617F mutant HSPC. Additionally, we tested the effects of blocking IL-1R1 using an anti-IL-1R1 antibody in the homozygous Jak2V617F knock-in mouse model of MF. We observed that anti-IL-1R1 antibody treatment significantly reduced peripheral blood WBC and neutrophil counts and decreased HSPC and myeloid precursors in the BM of Jak2 VF/VF mice. Furthermore, anti-IL-1R1 antibody treatment significantly reduced splenomegaly and markedly reduced BM fibrosis in Jak2 VF/VF mice, suggesting that therapies targeting IL-1R1 could be useful for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Overall, our results suggest that IL-1 signaling contributes to clonal expansion of Jak2V617F mutant HSPC and progression of bone marrow fibrosis in MPN. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Dynamic Stromal Changes in Myelofibrosis Patients Pre/Post JAK Inhibition Is Revealed in Clinically Archived Bone Marrow Biopsies By Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA)-CD34 Dual Immunohistochemistry

The natural history of BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is progression towards an overt myelofibrotic (MF) phase with variable risk to develop secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Current treatments include Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) which can temporarily alleviate MF-related symptoms but are non-curative and most patients eventually progress to a more advanced stage. Given the negative prognostic impact of bone marrow fibrosis in MPNs and generally poor outcome post JAKi failure, it would be important to identify in situ biomarkers that address the initiation, perpetuation and early reversal of the fibrotic reaction. The current clinical standard for bone marrow fibrosis assessment involves reticulin/trichrome stains that detect relatively static extracellular matrix products rather than the fibrosis driving cells directly. To address this, we have developed a smooth muscle actin stromal-vascular (SMA-CD34) dual immunohistochemical (IHC) technique amenable to morphologic scoring and complemented with a CellProfiler image analysis pipeline. SMA was prioritized over other validated stromal IHC markers given work by others in experimental models demonstrating SMA+ myofibroblasts to be the differentiated output of critical fibrosis inducing Gli1+ 'driver' mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in MPN. Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility of our translational approach using a clinically annotated cohort of MF patients from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre MPN Registry. After selecting for high quality (>1.0 cm) paired pre and post JAKi biopsies amenable to image and transcriptome-based analysis, the pilot cohort was comprised of 13 cases with 38% high-risk, 54% intermediate-2 and 8% intermediate-1 risk by DIPSS. Driver mutations were JAK2 V617F (77%), CALR (15%) and other (8%). JAKi therapies included ruxolitinib (31%) + pelabresib (23%), momelotinib (15%), itacitinib (15%) and pacritinib (8%). The SMA-CD34 stromal assessment at baseline revealed distinct interstitial myofibroblast patterns and vascular perturbations not captured by conventional clinical hematopathology assessment (e.g. SMA+ dilated sinusoids). A SMA-CD34 scoring system was developed using a 4-point scale representing normal (0 pts), increased vascularity (1 pt), focal interstitial SMA (2 pts), multifocal interstitial SMA (3 pts) and diffuse SMA (4 pts). Scoring was then performed by blinded hematopathologists. A trend towards JAK2 mutated MF cases demonstrating higher SMA grade at baseline was noted. Interestingly, variable trajectories in SMA scores emerged following treatment with JAKi. Specifically, SMA signals had increased in 15%, decreased in 46% and were stable in 38% post-JAKi when using a morphologic SMA grading scheme. When compared to reticulin fibrosis, the severity of SMA signals had diverged in 1/3 of the cases (e.g. SMA grade decreased, reticulin grade stable). To further complement the SMA-CD34 morphologic grading, a CellProfiler image analysis pipeline was developed yielding a non-vessel associated normalized SMA area metric as a supervised correlate of the clinical SMA scoring system (R 2 = 0.68). Additional supervised and unsupervised bioinformatic approaches for clustering of relevant SMA-CD34 features including an algorithm that informs SMA spatial patterns with respect to niche elements such as arterioles (CD34+SMA+), sinusoids (CD34+) and adipocytes is in development. Lastly, Nanostring Fibrosis V2 panel was employed on a subset that met RNA concentration and quality metrics. Exploratory interpretation showed significant differentially expressed genes in pre vs. post JAKi specimens related to lipid metabolism such as ADIPOR1, SCD, ELOVL6 as well as the chemokine CXCL16. This may suggest a link between fatty acid metabolism and inflammatory differentiation along the SMA-vascular axis in the bone marrow modulated by JAKi treatment. SMA-CD34 IHC stratifies MF bone marrow biopsies differentially from standard WHO reticulin/trichome grading providing a practical formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue-based biomarker for assessing fibrosis related bone marrow niche elements from archived clinical samples. While our pilot numbers precluded statistical evaluation by JAKi-type, clinical response and NGS mutational profile at this time, further studies are underway to validate the SMA-CD34 signature on a larger MF cohort. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gupta: Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Outcomes for Myelofibrosis Patients Following Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Using the Orca-T Graft from HLA-Matched Related and Unrelated Donors

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) is the only potentially curative therapy for patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). Allo SCT for MF has historically been challenging as many patients are transplanted with active or advanced disease and immune reconstitution in MF patients is often hindered by inflammation and bone marrow fibrosis. When compared to non-SCT therapies, MF patients who receive allo SCT achieve long-term survival benefits. However, it comes with an upfront cost of an increased risk of non-relapse mortality in the first year after allo SCT (Gowin K et al, Blood Av 2020). Therefore, there is an unmet need to improve on the early outcomes of transplantation for MF. Methods: We reviewed MF patients who underwent myeloablative allo SCT with Orca-T derived from HLA matched donors on NCT01660607 and NCT04013685. Orca-T is an investigational cellular product comprising stem and immune cells that leverages highly purified donor regulatory T cells to control alloreactive immune responses. Single agent GVHD prophylaxis was administered as tacrolimus or sirolimus. Results: We present outcomes for 7 MF patients with DIPSS risk of int-1 (n=1), int-2 or higher risk MF (n=6) treated with the Orca-T graft and compared this to 6 MF patients who underwent standard of care (SOC) allo SCT at Stanford, between 2017 - 2021 (Table 1). All patients were high or very high-risk based on MIPSS70 plus score v, 2.0. All patients had 10/10 HLA-matched donors, except 1 of 7 Orca-T patients who had 9/10 HLA-matched donor. All but 1 patient in both, Orca-T and SOC, recipients had prior Jakafi exposure. All Orca-T recipients had splenomegaly with spleen size of 16.3 - 23 cm. Engraftment occurred at median of D+13 (range 10-29) and 6 of 7 patients had 100% CD3 donor chimerism at D+100. 1 patient was 90% CD3 donor chimerism at D+100 but achieved 100% CD3 donor chimerism at D+180. All patients had significant marrow fibrosis, MF grade 2 or 3, before allo SCT. Regression of marrow fibrosis to MF grade 0 or 1 was noted by D+ 100 in 7 of 7 Orca-T recipients but only in 1 of 6 SOC patients. Orca-T recipients did not have grade 2-4 acute GVHD and 1 of 7 recipients had extensive chronic GVHD. Tacrolimus was tapered off in 3 of 7 patients at D+180. SOC recipients had 2 of 6 recipients with grade 2-4 acute GVHD, 3 of 6 recipients with extensive chronic GVHD and only 1 recipient was taken off tacrolimus at D+180. There were no deaths in Orca-T recipients and 2 deaths in SOC recipients before D+180, cause of death was acute GVHD and relapse. Finally, when compared to standard allo SCT, Orca-T recipients may have a reduced frequency and severity of infections without significant consequences while the SOC patients had severe and often multiple infections. Conclusion: Our data indicates that Orca-T graft was well tolerated and potentially efficacious in MF patients undergoing allo SCT. We observed early regression of marrow fibrosis at D+100 in all Orca-T recipients. This limited data suggests that Orca-T may afford an early resolution of an inflammatory microenvironment that allows for robust immune reconstitution and potentially lower incidence of serious infections. Orca-T is under continued investigation to reduce early non-relapse mortality for MF. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gandhi: CareDx Inc: Honoraria; Gamida Cell: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly: Pfizer, Amgen, Jazz, Medexus, Pfizer: Consultancy; Astellas, Jasper, Adaptive, Baxalta: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services: , Research Funding. Shiraz: Kite Pharma-Gilead: Research Funding. Fernhoff: Orca Bio: Current Employment. McClellan: Orca Bio: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Gotlib: Allakos: Consultancy; Cogent Biosciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair for the Eligibility and Central Response Review Committee, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kartos: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Meyer: Triursus Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; GigaImmune: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Indee, Jura: Consultancy.