Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with Dacarbazine or Bendamustine for Frontline Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Patients Aged 60 Years and Above: Interim Results of a Multi-Cohort Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 587-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Yasenchak ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Vivian Jean Mikao Cline-Burkhardt ◽  
Rodolfo E Bordoni ◽  
Dipti Patel-Donnelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Older patients (pts) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have inferior outcomes compared to younger pts treated with standard chemotherapy regimens, and tolerate therapy poorly. New therapeutic options that improve both efficacy and tolerability are needed for these pts. Brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®), an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, has durable activity as monotherapy in relapsed HL with a manageable safety profile. For frontline single agent treatment of HL pts aged ≥60 yrs, the objective response rate (ORR) was 92% (73% complete remission [CR]) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (mo) (Forero-Torres 2015). Brentuximab vedotin + dacarbazine (DTIC) demonstrated compelling activity in preclinical models (McEarchern 2010), and brentuximab vedotin + bendamustine (benda) provided an 82% CR rate in pts with relapsed HL (LaCasce 2014). This phase 2, frontline, open-label study examines the efficacy and durability of response of brentuximab vedotin as monotherapy and in combination with DTIC or benda in HL pts aged ≥60 yrs (NCT01716806). Methods Approximately 70 treatment-naïve pts aged ≥60 yrs with HL (30 monotherapy; 20 for each combination) are to be enrolled. Eligible pts have ECOG ≤3 and are ineligible for or have declined conventional treatment. Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg is administered every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles with DTIC (375 mg/m2) and up to 6 cycles with benda (90 or 70 mg/m2). Pts with clinical benefit may receive additional cycles of brentuximab vedotin. Response is assessed after Cycles 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and every 6 cycles thereafter. The primary endpoint is ORR per the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results Thus far, 60 pts have been treated (n=27 monotherapy; 22 DTIC combo; 11 benda combo). Median age for all pts was 76 yrs (range, 62-92), 55% were male, 65% had stage III-IV disease, 40% had B symptoms, 28% had ECOG 2-3, and 70% were deemed ineligible for conventional chemotherapy. To date, a median of 11.5 treatment cycles have been received by DTIC combo pts, compared to 8 cycles by monotherapy pts. Duration of treatment for the benda combo pts will be more clearly defined with additional follow-up time. A total of 45 pts have discontinued therapy. Discontinuations were due to adverse event (AE; n=18, including 15 for Grade 2 or 3 peripheral neuropathy), progressive disease (PD) after complete or partial remission (CR or PR; n=13), or other reasons (see table; n=14). Fifteen pts remain on therapy. For pts treated with the DTIC combo, the ORR was 100% (62% CR). The median PFS has not been reached (median observation time 9.8 mo) and 18/21 pts remain alive without PD. For pts treated with the benda combo, the starting dose of benda was reduced from 90 to 70 mg/m2 to improve tolerability after the first 10 pts were enrolled. The ORR was 100% (78% CR) in the first 9 pts; with limited observation time (median 3.6 mo), 8/9 pts remain alive without PD. Treatment-related AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurred in 43% of pts overall, SAEs were reported for 22% overall, and no pt died within 30 days of last dose. Conclusions This planned analysis demonstrated 100% ORRs for both the DTIC combo and benda combo with acceptable tolerability. Based upon these data, combinations including brentuximab vedotin appear to have promise as frontline therapy in this vulnerable patient population. Ongoing follow-up will define durability, and ultimately the potential role of these combinations as standard options for elderly patients with HL. Table. Monotherapy (N=27) DTIC Combo (N=22) Benda Combo a (N=11) Median treatment cycles (range) Brentuximab vedotin 8 (3, 23) b 11.5 (2, 16) 4 (2, 8) DTIC or benda - 11.5 (1, 12) 4 (1, 6) Pts remaining on therapy, n (%) 0 b 6 (27) 9 (82) Reason for treatment discontinuation, n (%) AE 11 (41) b 7 (32) 0 PD after CR or PR, n (%) 11 (41) b 2 (9) 0 Investigator decision 1 (4) b 4 (18) 1 (9) Pt decision 3 (11) b 2 (9) 1 (9) Completed treatment 0 b 1 (5) 0 Other non-AE reason 1 (4) b 0 0 Efficacy evaluable pts (N) 26 b 21 9 ORR, n (%) 24 (92) b 21 (100) 9 (100) CR rate, n (%) 19 (73) b 13 (62) 7 (78) PFS, median mo (range) 10.5 (2.6+, 22.3+) b - (4.2+, 14.3+) - (1.2+, 6.2+) Median observation time, mo (range) 20.4 (4.6, 30.4) 9.8 (4.9, 14.3) 3.6 (2.3, 7.0) Pts with progression or death, n (%) 16 (62) 3 (14) 1 (11) Treatment-related AE ≥ Grade 3, n (%) 13 (48) b 8 (36) 5 (45) Any SAE, n (%) 6 (22) b 2 (9) 5 (45) aEnrollment is ongoing bForero-Torres 2015 Disclosures Yasenchak: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin is indicated in the US for treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous stem cell transplant or after failure of at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens in patients who are not ASCT candidates. This study evaluates brentuximab vedotin as frontline treatment, both as monotherapy and in combination therapy, in older patients with HL.. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Cline-Burkhardt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Bordoni:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Patel-Donnelly:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Flynn:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fong:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A Phase 2 Study Of Single-Agent Brentuximab Vedotin For Front-Line Therapy Of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Patients Age 60 Years and Above: Interim Results

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4389-4389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Yasenchak ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
Jeff P. Sharman ◽  
Ralph V. Boccia ◽  
Beata Holkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Multi Agent ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in patients aged ≥60 years has disproportionately inferior outcomes as compared to HL in younger patients. This can be mostly attributed to treatment-related factors that compromise cure rates. Comorbidities in older patients are associated with higher rates of treatment-related toxicities and can prevent delivery of standard intensity and/or duration of chemotherapy. A retrospective multicenter analysis showed an increased incidence of bleomycin-associated pulmonary toxicity (32%; with a mortality rate of 25%) in HL patients aged ≥ 60 who received ABVD for frontline therapy (Evens 2012). Novel therapeutic approaches with improved efficacy and tolerability are needed for this population. Brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®) is an antibody-drug conjugate that comprises an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E. Robust antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity has been demonstrated in HL patients who relapse after conventional chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplant. A retrospective analysis of patients aged ≥60 years with relapsed/refractory CD30+ lymphomas across 7 single-agent brentuximab vedotin studies showed antitumor activity and clinical response duration consistent with those observed in younger patients (Fanale 2012). Thus, this ongoing phase 2, single-arm, open-label study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brentuximab vedotin as frontline monotherapy for HL patients aged ≥60 years (NCT01716806). Methods The population to be enrolled includes ∼30 treatment-naïve patients with classical HL (Stages I–IV). Eligible patients must be aged ≥60 years, have an ECOG status ≤3, and be ineligible for or have declined conventional chemotherapy. Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg is administered every 3 weeks by IV infusion. Patients achieving stable disease (SD) or better can receive up to 16 cycles of treatment, after which therapy can be continued for those experiencing clinical benefit. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Response assessments are performed at Cycles 2, 4, 8, 12, and EOT (including PET at Cycles 2, 8, and EOT). Results Thirteen patients with treatment-naïve classical HL have been enrolled to date. Median age was 75 years (range, 64 to 92) and approximately half of the patients were male (54%). Seven patients (54%) had moderate age-related renal insufficiency at baseline (creatinine clearance ≥30 and<60). Thus far, patients have received a median of 5 cycles of brentuximab vedotin treatment (range, 1 to 11). Four patients discontinued treatment, 2 due to progressive disease, 1 due to a serious adverse event (Grade 3 orthostatic hypotension), and 1 due to patient decision. Of the 11 patients with a response assessment (see table), the ORR was 82% (n=9) and the complete remission (CR) rate was 64% (n=7). For the 10 patients who had interim PET scans after 2 cycles of therapy, the mean decrease in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between baseline and Cycle 2 was 83%. Cycle 2 PET scans were negative (Deauville Score 1-3) in 36% of patients, and the range of duration of response was 0.1+ to 20.6+ weeks thus far. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥15% of patients included neutrophil count decreased, peripheral sensory neuropathy, pruritus, and rash (n=2 each); most events were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 treatment-related AEs included neutrophil count decreased, rash, and orthostatic hypotension (n=1 each). No Grade 4 or 5 events have been observed to date. Conclusions In this interim analysis of patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed HL, compelling antitumor activity with single-agent brentuximab vedotin has been demonstrated. To date, a response rate of 82% has been shown in this historically challenging population of patients who either declined or were not eligible for standard chemotherapy. Preliminary safety data demonstrate tolerability in this patient population and the data are consistent with the current safety profile of brentuximab vedotin. Disclosures: Yasenchak: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin is indicated for treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous stem cell transplant or after failure of at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens in patients who are not ASCT candidates and for the treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. Chen:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel expenses Other. Sharman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Boccia:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Holkova:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Rosen:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/scientific board membership Other, Honoraria, Research Funding. Friedberg:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Meara:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

FDG-PET Adapted Sequential Therapy With Brentuximab Vedotin and Augmented ICE Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplant For Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2099-2099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Moskowitz ◽  
Heiko Schoder ◽  
John F. Gerecitano ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Pre-transplant FDG-PET (PET) normalization is the strongest predictor of outcome following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for patients with relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (Moskowitz, AJ. Blood. 2010 Dec 2;116(23):4934-7). Due to its high efficacy in ASCT failures, we aimed to determine whether brentuximab vedotin (BV) can replace ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) salvage therapy, increase rate of PET normalization, and enhance referral to ASCT for patients (pts) who fail front-line HL therapy. Here we present our phase II study evaluating a novel salvage strategy for rel/ref HL, an intent-to-treat study of PET-adapted sequential therapy with BV and augmented ICE (augICE) prior to ASCT. Methods Patients with rel/ref HL who have failed 1 prior regimen are enrolling on this phase II clinical trial. Patients receive weekly brentuximab vedotin (BV) administered at 1.2mg/Kg IV weekly for 3 weeks on and 1 week off for 2 cycles, followed by PET. Patients who achieve normalization of PET (Deauville 2 or less) proceed to ASCT. Patients with PET scores of Deauville 3 or higher receive 2 cycles of augICE prior to consideration for ASCT. Results 41 of planned 46 patients have enrolled; 34 pts completed salvage therapy, of whom 33 proceeded to ASCT. 28 pts are at least 90 days post-ASCT and represent the focus of this report. These 28 pts include 20 (71%) males, 21 (75%) pts with primary refractory or relapse within 1 year of initial treatment, 11 (39%) with B symptoms at enrollment and 11 (39%) with extranodal disease. Median number CD34+ cells/kg collected were 7.44x 10^6 (2.96 - 31.43x10^6). Disease status prior to ASCT was CR (Deauville 2) for 27 pts and PR (Deauville 3) for 1 pt. Salvage therapy for pts in CR prior to ASCT include BV alone (9), BV followed by augICE (16), and BV followed by augICE (with Deauville 4 response) followed by involved field radiation to achieve CR (2). The 1 patient in PR prior to ASCT received BV followed by augICE. Conditioning regimens included BEAM (9), CBV( 9), and high dose chemoradiotherapy (10). Early (within 90 days) transplant-related toxicities include grade 2 pneumonitis (3pts) and grade 3 acute kidney injury (1pt); late toxicities include grade 3 esophageal stenosis (1pt), grade 3 acute kidney injury (1pt), and 1 death (7 months post ASCT) due to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. After a median follow-up of 9.5 months post-ASCT (range 3.3-15.6 months), 2 of 28 pts have progressed (at 2.7 and 4.3 months post ASCT respectively). One achieved a second CR with BV and proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT); the second achieved near CR following GND (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, Doxil) and proceeded to alloSCT. Conclusion PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with BV followed by augICE produces high CR rates, adequate stem cell collection, and facilitates referral to ASCT for virtually all pts. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Moskowitz: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin is approved for treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma following failure of 2 multi-agent regimens or autologous stem cell transplant. This study is evaluating the use of brentuximab vedotin in the pre-transplant setting for Hodgkin lymphoma. Schoder:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics : Consultancy, Honoraria. Horwitz:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Moskowitz:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Phase 1/2 Study Of Brentuximab Vedotin In Pediatric Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory (R/R) Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) Or Systemic Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma (sALCL): Preliminary Phase 2 Data For Brentuximab Vedotin 1.8 Mg/Kg In The HL Study Arm

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4378-4378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Kathleen A Neville ◽  
Angelo Rosolen ◽  
Judith Landman-Parker ◽  
Nathalie Aladjidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Preliminary Phase

Abstract Background Brentuximab vedotin is a CD30-targeted antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E. Pivotal phase 2 studies reported the efficacy and manageable toxicities of the drug, leading to its approval by the US FDA for use in adult patients with R/R HL and R/R sALCL in 2011. Data for brentuximab vedotin in children with these lymphomas are currently limited but promising. This ongoing phase 1/2 prospective, open-label, multicenter study is the first clinical trial of brentuximab vedotin conducted exclusively in pediatric patients with R/R HL or R/R sALCL (NCT01492088). The phase 1 portion established the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of brentuximab vedotin in pediatric patients with R/R HL or R/R sALCL as 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3wk), and complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were reported in 88% of patients at the RP2D. Here, we report preliminary phase 2 response, safety and PK findings for the HL patients receiving the RP2D. Methods The phase 2 portion aimed to enroll 15 response-evaluable HL patients at the RP2D, including those R/R HL patients treated at the RP2D in phase 1 (phase 2 data for the sALCL patients are not reported here). The phase 2 primary objective was overall response rate (ORR; CR + PR) at the RP2D; secondary objectives were time to progression, time to response, duration of response, event-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival, to characterize PK, to further evaluate safety, and to determine immunogenicity of brentuximab vedotin. Patients with R/R HL aged 5 to<18 years, with measurable disease, who were in their second or later relapse, had failed chemotherapy, and were ineligible for, refused, or previously received stem cell transplant, received brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg by IV infusion Q3wk for up to 16 cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Responses will be assessed both by the investigators and independent review facility per IWG revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma; investigator responses are reported here. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected on day 1 (all cycles) immediately before and 5 minutes after the infusion and on prespecified days during cycles 1, 2, and 8. Results 16 patients with R/R HL received at least 1 dose of brentuximab vedotin at the RP2D; median age was 15 years (range, 8–18); 56% were male; Ann Arbor stage at initial diagnosis was 44% stage II, 6% stage III, 44% stage IV, and 6% unknown; median time from initial diagnosis was 16.7 months (range, 0–38) and 50% had B symptoms at baseline. At data cut-off (June 20, 2013), patients had received a median of 3 cycles of treatment (range, 1–16); 10 (63%) patients had discontinued treatment due to: progressive disease (n=7), AEs (n=2), and allogeneic transplant (n=1). Response data were available for 14 patients at data cut-off. The ORR was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35, 87); 3 (21%; 95% CI: 5, 51) patients achieved CR and 6 (43%; 95% CI: 18, 71) achieved PR. Reponses were typically observed at C2. 12 of 16 (75%) patients had ≥1 AE, and 7 (44%) had grade ≥3 AEs. The most common (>1 patient) AEs were nausea (38%), pyrexia (31%), neutropenia, paresthesia (each 19%), abdominal pain, upper abdominal pain, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, hepatotoxicity, hypokalemia, leukopenia, myalgia, pharyngitis, and vomiting (each 13%). 7 serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 5 patients; 4 SAEs in 3 patients were considered related to brentuximab vedotin: grade 3 hepatotoxicity and grade 3 febrile neutropenia (n=1); grade 3 anaphylaxis (n=1); and grade 3 pneumonia (n=1). One patient died on C2D4 of unrelated cardiac arrest due to progressive mediastinum enlargement (disease progression). 2 (13%) patients discontinued, 1 due to grade 3 hepatotoxicity on C1D13 and 1 due to grade 3 peripheral neuropathy on C8D4. Preliminary PK data show that brentuximab vedotin remained detectable in the blood just prior to the next infusion over the treatment period; thus, patients remain exposed to brentuximab vedotin from cycle to cycle. Conclusions Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg Q3wk (RP2D) was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients with R/R HL and demonstrated preliminary evidence of activity, with an ORR to date of 64%, including 21% CR. The phase 2 portion is ongoing in pediatric patients with R/R HL and R/R sALCL. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin for the treatment of pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Franklin:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding. Fasanmade:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Wang:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment. Sachs:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment. Mauz-Koerholz:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Brentuximab Vedotin Monotherapy in DLBCL Patients with Undetectable CD30: Preliminary Results from a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 629-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Mitchell R. Smith ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Tatyana Feldman ◽  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor outcome. In pts who progress <1 year after frontline treatment with rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy, response rates to salvage therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) are 46–51% with a 3-year event-free survival of ~20% (Gisselbrecht 2010). For pts ineligible for transplant, no standard of care exists and median overall survival for pts not responding to second-line therapy is only 4 months (Elstrom 2010). Novel therapeutic options are needed for these pts. A phase 2, open-label study was initiated to assess antitumor activity of brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®), an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, in relapsed/refractory CD30+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including DLBCL. Significant antitumor activity was observed in DLBCL over a wide range of CD30 expression, including very low levels (<1–10%) as assessed by pathology at participating sites. As previously reported, 41% of DLBCL pts achieved an objective response (16% CR), regardless of CD30 expression (Bartlett, ASH 2013, Abstract 848). Subsequently, the trial was amended to investigate the antitumor activity of brentuximab vedotin in ~50 DLBCL pts with undetectable CD30 expression using standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) (NCT01421667). Preliminary results for this planned subset analysis of those pts are now available. Methods Eligible pts must have DLBCL with undetectable CD30 expression on tumor cells by visual assessment using routine IHC (anti-CD30 BerH2 antibody) per local lab. Pts must also have had 1–3 prior therapies and an ECOG performance status ≤2. Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg is administered every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for pts who achieve stable disease or better. The primary endpoint is objective response rate per Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Key secondary endpoints include safety and duration of response. Results Thus far, 27 DLBCL pts with undetectable CD30 expression per local lab have been enrolled and treated. All patients had elevated soluble CD30 at baseline with a median of 166 ng/mL and range of 55–1,696 ng/mL (normal, ≤29 ng/mL). Most pts had advanced stage disease at baseline (78%); median age was 65 years (range, 42–91); and 81% had an ECOG performance status of 1–2. The median number of prior therapies was 2, and 8 pts had 3 prior therapies. Six (22%) pts had received prior autologous SCT. Of 14 pts (52%) with refractory disease at study entry, 11 were also refractory to their frontline treatment. To date, pts have received a median of 2 cycles of brentuximab vedotin (range, 1–10), and 12 (44%) pts remain on treatment. Thirteen pts discontinued treatment due to progressive disease, 1 withdrew consent, and 1 pt died due to an unrelated serious adverse event (SAE) of cardiac arrest. At the time of this analysis, 6 (27%) of 22 pts who have had restaging assessments achieved an objective response, including 1 CR and 5 PRs. The CR began at Cycle 6 and is ongoing after 9 weeks. It is too early to assess median response duration. For the 6 pts who achieved an objective response, undetectable CD30 was confirmed by central review. Peripheral sensory neuropathy and nausea were the most frequently occurring adverse events (AEs; 22% each). AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurring in more than 1 pt included hypokalemia, neutropenia (11% each), dehydration, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting (7% each). All were Grade 3 in severity with the exception of 1 Grade 4 neutropenia. Four deaths occurred within 30 days of last dose; all were disease related except one due to cardiac arrest unrelated to study drug in a pt with prior cardiovascular disease and co-existing risk factors. Conclusions In this interim analysis of DLBCL pts with undetectable CD30, objective responses have been observed in 6 of 22 pts (27%) who have undergone restaging assessments. Safety data are consistent with historic results and pts continue to enroll on study. Activity of brentuximab vedotin in pts with undetectable CD30 by IHC may be explained wholly or in part by one of several factors, including tumor heterogeneity, levels of CD30 on tumor below the level of IHC sensitivity, uptake by cells in the tumor microenvironment that can release the cytotoxic payload, or deletion of repressive cells within the tumor microenvironment. Correlative work to better understand this activity is ongoing. Disclosures Bartlett: ImaginAb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin is indicated in the US for treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous stem cell transplant or after failure of at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens in patients who are not ASCT candidates and for the treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. Smith:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Advani:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda International Pharmaceuticals Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other. Feldman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Savage:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Palanca-Wessels:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Siddiqi:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals A Pilot Study of Brentuximab Vedotin, Rituximab and Dose Attenuated CHP in Patients 75 Years and Older with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Reagan ◽  
Craig A. Portell ◽  
Carla Casulo ◽  
Andrea M. Baran ◽  
Allison Magnuson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Peripheral Sensory

Older patients with hematologic malignancies are underrepresented on prospective clinical trials relative to the incidence of disease in this group (Kanapuru et al, 2020). There are few studies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) focused specifically on older patients. Rituximab and dose attenuated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-miniCHOP) has been studied on a prospective trial in fit patients aged 80 years and older. Seventy-two percent of patients on this study completed 6 cycles of R-miniCHOP. The overall response rate (ORR) was 73%, and the 2-year progression free survival (PFS) was 47% (Peyrade et al, 2011). Novel regimens are needed to improve upon the efficacy of therapy while preserving tolerability. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has demonstrated activity in relapsed and refractory DLBCL (Jacobsen et al, 2015) as well as in combination with chemoimmunotherapy (Svoboda, 2020). This study evaluates the feasibility of BV with dose attenuated chemoimmunotherapy. Methods: Patients with both CD30 positive (cut off 1%) and CD30 negative DLBCL aged 75 years and older were enrolled on the study. Patients received six, 3-week cycles of BV 1.8 mg/kg, cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2, doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, vincristine 1 mg and prednisone 40 mg/m2 days 1-5 (BV R-miniCHP). For the first cycle patients received BV and prednisone as a prephase starting one week prior to cycle 1. All patients received pegfilgrastim. All patients underwent geriatric assessments at screening, following prephase and at the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was feasibility of this regimen in older patients. The regimen was considered feasible if 71% of patients completed 6 cycles of treatment with a 90% confidence interval (CI)=(58.0, 90.6%). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, ORR and complete response (CR) evaluated by positron emission tomography, PFS and overall survival (OS). Response assessments used the Lugano Criteria (Cheson et al, 2014). PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled and started prephase with BV and prednisone. Their baseline characteristics are summarized in the table. Seventy-seven percent (17/22) of patients completed 6 cycles of BV R-miniCHP. Reasons for not completing treatment included progressive disease in 2 patients, myocardial infarction, fatigue, and an unrelated injury in 1 patient each. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response. ORR was 86% (18/21) in all patients, with 67% (14/21) achieving CR. In CD30 positive patients the ORR was 80% (8/10) and the CR rate was 70% (7/10). In CD30 negative patients the ORR was 91% (10/11) and the CR rate was 64% (7/11). With a median follow up of 23 months, median OS and PFS (figure) were not reached. The 2-year PFS was 60.6%, 90% CI=(40.0%, 76.1%), and the 2-year OS was 73.9%, 90% CI=(52.4%, 86.8%). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (82%), anemia (50%), diarrhea (50%), dysgeusia (45%) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (45%). Grade ≥3 AEs seen in more than 2 patients included neutropenia (23%), fatigue (18%), pneumonia (18%), hypoxia (14%), thrombocytopenia (9%) and thromboembolism (9%). Grade ≥3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was seen in 9% of patients. There were two deaths in patients receiving study treatment. These included a myocardial infarction related to treatment, and a bowel obstruction secondary to disease progression. Three other patients have died in follow up with 2 secondary to disease progression and 1 due to an unrelated event. Conclusions: The study met its primary feasibility endpoint with 77% of patients completing 6 cycles of therapy. This regimen was delivered safely in this population and toxicities were consistent with those reported in larger prospective studies with R-miniCHOP or ofatumumab and miniCHOP (Peyrade et al, 2011; Peyrade et al 2017). Peripheral neuropathy is a key AE of interest given the inclusion of BV and while nearly half of patients experienced some peripheral neuropathy, it was severe in only 9% of pts. The ORR and CR rate, as well as the 2-year PFS compare favorably to other prospective studies in a population that included patients with high clinical risk, histologic transformation, and double hit lymphoma. BV and R-miniCHP may be a feasible regimen in older patients, and warrants further study based on these preliminary data demonstrating clinical activity and tolerability. Figure 1 Disclosures Reagan: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Portell:Xencor: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Barr:Gilead: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Abbvie/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy. Friedberg:Acerta Pharma - A member of the AstraZeneca Group, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.: Other; Roche: Other: Travel expenses; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with Nivolumab, Doxorubucin, and Dacarbazine in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2836-2836
Author(s):  
Judah Friedman ◽  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Linda Ho ◽  
Ian W. Flinn
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Bulky Disease

Background For patients with advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), the most common frontline regimen has historically consisted of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), which originated in 1975 (Connors 2018). However, up to 30% of patients treated with ABVD as frontline therapy will relapse or are refractory to treatment (Canellos 1992; Carde 2016; Gordon 2013). Additionally, bleomycin is associated with potentially fatal pulmonary toxicity (Canellos 2004; Martin 2004), and vinblastine is associated with neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Brentuximab vedotin (BV, ADCETRIS®) has been approved for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated Stage III or IV cHL in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine based on the results of the ECHELON-1 study (Connors 2017). Data reported from ECHELON-1 showed patients randomized to the BV + doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) treatment arm had a statistically significant 23% risk reduction in modified PFS events vs patients randomized to the ABVD arm of the study. The combination of BV plus nivolumab was reported as showing potential for the treatment of cHL. The combination was evaluated as a potential frontline treatment option for patients with cHL who are over 60 years of age and ineligible for or declining conventional combination chemotherapy (Friedberg, 2018). The ongoing study reported an ORR of 82% in 11 patients and the regimen appears well tolerated in this population. In another trial in 62 patients in the first salvage setting, the combination produced a 61% CR rate (Herrera 2018) and the patients were able to undergo subsequent stem cell transplant. BV and nivolumab have been combined separately with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine and shown to be active and well tolerated. Furthermore, BV has been evaluated in combination with just doxorubicin and dacarbazine, omitting vinblastine, in 34 patients with previously untreated non-bulky stage I/II cHL and showed 100% complete response rate at end of treatment (EOT) and PFS and OS rates of 100% at last follow up (median=15 months; Abramson 2018). This combination resulted in a low incidence of neutropenia and alopecia, and moderate (Grade 1 or 2) peripheral neuropathy. It is therefore reasonable to expect that the combination of BV, nivolumab, doxorubicin, and dacarbazine (AN + AD) will result in high response rates and be well tolerated, with potentially less toxicity. Study Design SGN35-027 (NCT03646123) is a phase 2 study designed to evaluate growth factor prophylaxis plus BV in combination with AVD in patients with stage III and IV cHL (Part A). A second cohort has been added to the study (Part B), which will evaluate the combination of AN + AD in this patient population. The primary objective of Part B is to estimate the CR rate at EOT with AN + AD in patients with previously untreated advanced cHL. All enrolled patients will be 12 years or older, with an ECOG performance status of ≤2. Patients in Part B will be treatment-naïve with Ann Arbor Stage IIB/III/IV cHL or Stage IIA cHL with bulky disease. Patients must have bidimensional measurable disease, as documented by radiographic technique, and qualifying baseline laboratory data. Patients will be excluded if they have nodular lymphocyte predominant HL or have symptomatic neurologic disease that compromises normal activities of daily living or requires medication. Patients with known cerebral or meningeal disease, including signs or symptoms of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, will also be excluded. Approximately 50 patients will be enrolled in Part B. All patients will be treated with BV 1.2 mg/kg, nivolumab 240 mg, doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2. All study drugs will each be administered separately by IV infusion on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles of treatment. Efficacy will be assessed by PET and CT scans at Cycle 2 and EOT. Disease assessments will be performed during follow-up every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for 2 additional years, and then per institutional standard of care. Disease response and progression will be assessed by investigators using the Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria modification of Lugano Classification Revised Staging System for nodal non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphomas (Cheson 2016). Disclosures Friedman: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lee:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Ho:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Flinn:AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Outcome of Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Brentuximab Vedotin for Relapse after Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: A Retrospective Analysis of the LWP-EBMT

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4018-4018
Author(s):  
Nikesh Dhiraj Chavda ◽  
Stephen Robinson ◽  
Ariane Boumendil ◽  
Irma Khvedelidze ◽  
Hervé Finel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Travel Grant

Around half of patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) who progress or relapse through first line therapy can be cured with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, this leaves approximately 50% of patients that will relapse after ASCT. The pivotal phase II SG035-00303 trial demonstrated that these patients can be successfully treated with Brentuximab Vedotin (BV), and a proportion of them can be long term free of disease without any further intervention. The objective of the current study was to investigate whether these findings were borne out in the real world via interrogation of the EBMT registry. We retrospectively analysed data for 101 patients with HL who had BV as their first treatment for relapse after ASCT from 2012 to 2019. The median age at ASCT was 34 years (range: 19-65), 60% being male and with 62% being in complete response (CR) at the time of ASCT. Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Melphalan (BEAM) was the most common conditioning regimen, having been employed in 72% of the cases. The median time from ASCT to relapse was 10.1 months (interquartile range (IQR): 6.1-25.1). The median time on BV was 3.4 months (IQR: 2.1-5.24). BV treatment resulted in a best overall response rate (ORR) of 59% with a CR rate of 37%. At last follow-up only 2 patients remain on treatment with BV. The main reason for discontinuation of BV was progression which occurred in 37% of the patients. In 32 cases (33%) the treatment was stopped electively to proceed to a second transplant, and overall nearly a quarter (22%) completed the full treatment course. Only 5% of patients stopped due to toxicity (peripheral neuropathy 2 and neutropenia, infusion reaction and other, 1 each). Further therapy was given after BV in over half of evaluable patients (58%), with check point inhibitors (CPIs) being the most common agents used (24% of these). Nearly two thirds (64/101) of the patients received a second transplant, which were nearly all allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT, 59/64), and most of these (49/59) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). 26% of the alloSCT recipients experienced grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) and 25% developed chronic GvHD. At last follow up, 62% of all patients were alive with a median follow-up of 25 months after starting BV. Of these, 27 had received a second transplant, who were mostly in CR at last follow up (26/27) and a further 22 had relapsed. There were 11 patients of the 63 still alive who continued to be responding to BV without further therapy with a median duration of response of 30 months. In conclusion BV use for relapse after ASCT was well tolerated generally, with only a minority of patients stopping treatment due to toxicity. However, although almost two thirds of the patients achieved a response, further treatment was often needed after BV, notably with CPIs and most patients were consolidated with a RIC alloSCT. These results confirm that only a minority of patients can achieve a durable remission with BV alone. Disclosures Brice: Takeda France: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Blaise:Molmed: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre medicaments: Honoraria. Stamatoullas:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Robak:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel grant; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Morphosys AG: Research Funding. Wahlin:Roche and Gilead: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Ixazomib in Previously Untreated Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5326-5326
Author(s):  
Solomon A. Graf ◽  
Ryan C. Lynch ◽  
David G. Coffey ◽  
Mazyar Shadman ◽  
Sandra Kanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Reduction ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Indication For Treatment

Abstract Background: Frontline treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iB-NHL) typically involves intravenously administered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy. Effective and low-toxicity therapies with improved convenience of administration are sought. We hypothesized that ixazomib (Ix) could safely and conveniently induce remissions in patients with untreated iB-NHL. Here we present the first data on frontline use of Ix in untreated iB-NHL. Methods: This single-arm, open-label phase II "window" trial for patients with untreated iB-NHL (NCT02339922) opened to enrollment in May 2016. Eligibility included histopathologically confirmed iB-NHL, measurable disease, a clinical indication for treatment based on NCCN guidelines, and no prior systemic treatment. Ix was administered at 4 mg orally once a week on consecutive 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and four doses of weekly rituximab (R) were added during the 7th cycle, after the initial window period. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed response rate after independent radiology review. Response assessment occurred at every 2 cycles and using standard (Lugano) criteria. Tumor tissue was collected for gene expression profiling and immunohistochemical evaluation of molecular pathways associated with proteasome inhibition. Results: As of July 1, 2018, 15 patients were treated. The median age was 64 years (range, 47 to 81) and 53% were men. Disease histologies included follicular lymphoma (FL, n = 10), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, n = 2), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL, n = 2), and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL, n = 1). At the start of therapy, all had stage III/IV disease and B-symptoms were present in 40%. For patients with FL, 80% had poor risk by FLIPI. Overall, the indication for treatment included symptoms due to disease (40%), steady progression of disease (33%), and cytopenia due to disease (27%). To date, 14 patients were evaluable for response and 13 experienced tumor burden reduction during the Ix-only window (Figure 1). Of patients with FL, 6 completed the Ix-only window phase and, of these, 5 achieved PR. An additional 4 patients with FL have not completed all 6 cycles of Ix monotherapy. Of these, 1 patient achieved a PR after 4 cycles and continues on treatment, 1 patient came off study with stable disease after 4 cycles, and 2 patients have experienced tumor reduction without meeting formal response criteria and continue on treatment (after 2 and 4 cycles, respectively). Of those patients with FL that received R, all achieved formal remission (3 CR, 3 PR). Median progression free survival has not been reached with a median follow up of 7.4 months. No patient with non-FL histology had yet achieved a PR during the Ix-only window or had undergone response assessment after receiving R at the time of the data cut. The most common adverse events (AEs) for all pts were grade 1-2 and included nausea (53%), diarrhea (53%), rash (40%), and fatigue (33%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 20% patients (grade 2 in 7%). A single grade ≥ 3 AE occurred (syncope, grade 3). Conclusions: Data from this interim analysis suggest that Ix monotherapy is well tolerated and highly active in the frontline treatment of FL with all patients demonstrating tumor reduction to date and augmented responses following the addition of R. Non-FL histologies of B-NHL appear less responsive to Ix, but numbers are small. Accrual on study continues. Correlative analyses are underway to determine if Ix or Ix-R may represent a viable frontline option for some patients with iB-NHL. Figure 1. Waterfall plot of response. Number of cycles of treatment received to date indicated for each subject. Four weekly doses of rituximab are added, per protocol, with the 7th cycle of ixazomib. Asterisk indicates treatment on study ongoing. Disclosures Graf: Acerta: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding. Lynch:T.G. Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Johnson Graffe Keay Moniz & Wick LLP: Consultancy. Shadman:Genentech: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Gopal:Pfizer: Research Funding; Aptevo: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Brim: Consultancy; Asana: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 3 Study of Pomalidomide with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Asian Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma (RRMM) - Interim Analysis of a Trial By the Asian Myeloma Network (AMN)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Wee-Joo Chng ◽  
Xinhua Li ◽  
Cindy Lin ◽  
Jin Seok Kim ◽  
Hiroshi Handa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Background Pomalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that has been approved for the treatment of relapse refractory myeloma. A previous small randomized phase 2 study in the United States showed that combination of Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induce a greater response rate than pomalidomide and dexamethasone1. In our prior study, AMN0012, we should that in patients with sub-optimal response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone, the addition of cyclophosphamide can increase response resulting in improvement of progression free survival. In the current study, we seek to randomize Asian patients with RRMM between PCD and PD to confirm the benefit of PCD. Method We conducted a prospective randomized trial of pomalidomide (4mg daily for 21 days followed by 7 days rest) plus dexamethasone 40mg once weekly for 4 weeks with or without cyclophosphamide (400mg once a week) in patients with relapse and refractory myeloma that has to be refractory to lenalidomide and has prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors. Each cycle is 4 weeks. Patients from Singapore, Japan and Korea (NCT03143049) were included in this Asian Myeloma Network trial. The trial was started in Sep 2017 and is still ongoing. To date, 53 patients have been recruited so far. This interim report presents data available up till the data cut-off date of 24 June 2020. Results Forty-six patients have available base line information and safety data and is included in this interim analysis. 50% of patients are male and median age of the cohort is 68 years old. 39% and 28% of patients are International Stage System (ISS) stage 2 and 3 respectively. 20% of patients have abnormal creatinine clearance. Median prior line of treatment is 3. All patients are refractory to lenalidomide and 96% have prior exposure to bortezomib. In addition, 12 patients (26%) and 5 (11%) have been treated with Carfilzomib and Ixazomib respectively. 15 (33%) patients had prior high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant. 20 (44%) patients required dose reduction of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide or dexamethasone. 89% of patients experience adverse events (AEs) of any grade. Of the 297 episodes of AEs, 43% are grade 3 or higher, with 50% of these episodes related to the study drugs. 57% of patients experienced serious AEs (SAEs) of any grade. Of the 74 episodes of SAE, 89% are grade 3 or higher, with 49% of these episodes related to the study drugs. Almost all of these events are related to cytopenias and infections. 20 (44%) of the patients develop grade 3 neutropenic fever and 9 (20%) patients have grade 3 or higher pneumonia. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, 1 patient develop grade 3 pulmonary embolism, 1 patient developed grade 3 venous thromboembolism, and 1 patient experienced grade 3 renal impairment. At a median follow-up of 10.9 months, 9 of the 46 patients have died, and 21 have progressed. Three patients withdrew due to toxicity. While the overall response of the study population is not part of this interim analysis, we assessed the response of patients from the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore which has the highest number of patients recruited to get an idea of the therapeutic efficacy. Of the 14 patients recruited at NCIS, 1 patient achieved CR, 3 VGPR, 7 PR, producing a response rate of 79%. Conclusion In this interim analysis of a prospective randomized study of pomalidomide and dexamethasone with or without cyclophosphamide in Asian patients, we demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of this combination. Longer follow-up and final analysis of the study will be needed to ascertain the therapeutic advantage of PCD over PD in relapse and refractory myeloma that is refractory to lenalidomide. References 1. Baz RC, Martin TG 3rd, Lin HY, Zhao X, Shain KH, Cho HJ, Wolf JL, Mahindra A, Chari A, Sullivan DM, Nardelli LA, Lau K, Alsina M, Jagannath S. Randomized multicenter phase 2 study of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma. Blood. 2016 May 26;127(21):2561-8. 2. Soekojo CY, Kim K, Huang SY, Chim CS, Takezako N, Asaoku H, Kimura H, Kosugi H, Sakamoto J, Gopalakrishnan SK, Nagarajan C, Wei Y, Moorakonda R, Lee SL, Lee JJ, Yoon SS, Kim JS, Min CK, Lee JH, Durie B,Chng WJ. 3. Pomalidomide and dexamethasone combination with additional cyclophosphamide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (AMN001)-a trial by the Asian Myeloma Network. Blood Cancer J. 2019 Oct 8;9(10):83. Disclosures Chng: Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Outcome of Hodgkin Lymphoma after Progression Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2994-2994
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Alina S Gerrie ◽  
Maryse M Power ◽  
Kerry J Savage
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Clinical trials have demonstrated a high level of effectiveness for brentuximab vedotin (BV) for patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL); however, how patients fare in routine clinical practice if their HL recurs after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is less clear. Our primary objective was to characterize overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among a cohort of real-world patients treated with BV after ASCT. The secondary objective was to characterize the outcome of treatment after failure of ASCT or ASCT and BV. Methods We screened the population-based British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) Lymphoid Cancer Database to identify patients with classical HL (excluding lymphocyte predominant HL) who were aged >16 years at initial diagnosis, staged and treated in BC, had primary treatment with ABVD or equivalent chemotherapy, underwent ASCT as part of first treatment for refractory or relapsed disease and relapsed again after ASCT. We excluded patients who have been treated at any time with a checkpoint inhibitor. We determined Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from the date of the progression that occurred after ASCT and, for those treated with the agent, after subsequent BV. Therapies given in sequence without a pause between therapies were considered part of the same line of therapy. Results Between 1986 and 2015 93 patients experienced recurrence of HL after ASCT. Their median age at initial diagnosis was 30 years and 51% were male. After failure of ASCT 23 (25%) received radiation monotherapy and 61 received chemotherapy (66%), either as a single agent or in various combinations and of these 9 (10%) also received radiation; 6 (6%) received a second transplant (5 allogeneic and 1 repeat ASCT); and 5 refused or were too frail for treatment other than with corticosteroids. The median PFS and OS from the time of relapse after ASCT for these 93 patients were 7.1 (range 0.2-352) and 16.2 months (range 0.2-352), respectively. Of those 93, 17 patients received BV alone or BV+bendamustine at some point following ASCT. The median age of BV-treated patients was 33 years at the time of their original diagnosis and 29% were male. Among those 17 patients, 9 received single agent BV and 8, BV+bendamustine as part of a clinical trial. The median time from ASCT to the start of BV was 27.5 months. Counting ASCT as 2nd line treatment, 10 individuals received BV as 3rd line, 6 as 4th line and 1 as 5th line therapy. For all 17 patients the subsequent median PFS and OS from the time of BV initiation were 5.1 (range 1.5-34.6) and 18.8 months (range 2.4-40.5), respectively. 12 of these patients relapsed again and their subsequent median PFS and OS were 0.6 (range 0.5-29) and 3 (range 0.5-30) months, respectively. All 9 patients who received single agent BV relapsed again at a median of 2 months (range 1.2-9.7); 5 of the 8 patients treated with BV+bendamustine remain in remission 6 to 36 months later. Conclusions These data highlight the poor prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory cHL, particularly for those whose lymphoma recurs after brentuximab vedotin as well as the highly individualized management of patients whose lymphoma has recurred after ASCT. Future therapies that prevent or significantly delay relapse will help in alleviate the substantial clinical burden due to relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Disclosures Connors: Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document