scholarly journals B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (CART-BCMA) for Multiple Myeloma (MM): Initial Safety and Efficacy from a Phase I Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1147-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. Cohen ◽  
Alfred L. Garfall ◽  
Edward A Stadtmauer ◽  
Simon Francis Lacey ◽  
Eric Lancaster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background : BCMA is expressed on MM cells, and CAR T cells targeting BCMA have pre-clinical anti-MM activity. CART-BCMA is an autologous T cell product engineered by lentiviral transduction to express a fully human BCMA-specific CAR with CD3ζ and 4-1BB signaling domains, and then expanded ex vivo using CD3/CD28 beads. Methods: In this ongoing, 3+3 dose-escalation study, relapsed/refractory MM patients (pts) receive CART-BCMA cells as split-dose infusions (10% on day 0, 30% on day 1, and 60% on day 2). Three cohorts are planned: 1) 1-5 x 108 CART cells alone; 2) cyclophosphamide (CTX) 1.5 g/m2 + 1-5 x 107 CART cells; and 3) CTX 1.5 g/m2 + 1-5 x 108 CART cells. Pts need serum creatinine (Cr) <2.5 mg/dL or Cr clearance≥30 ml/min, and adequate hepatic, cardiac, and pulmonary function. BCMA expression on MM cells is analyzed by flow cytometry, though no pre-specified level is required for eligibility. CART-BCMA frequency and activation status are assessed in blood and marrow by flow cytometry. Levels of CAR-transduced cells are also measured by qPCR using a transgene-specific primer/probe pair. Soluble BCMA, BAFF and APRIL levels in serum are assessed by ELISA. Bioactivity of the infusion product and CART-related cytokine release syndrome are analyzed by Luminex. Responses are assessed by IMWG criteria. Results: To date, 11 pts have been screened, and 6 treated in cohort 1. Reasons for not receiving treatment were screen fail (n=2), rapid MM progression/renal failure (n=2), and pt/MD choice (n=1). The 6 treated pts were all IMID/PI-refractory with high risk cytogenetics and median 9 lines of therapy (Table). All expressed BCMA on MM cells, and achieved the minimum target dose of 1x108 CART-BCMA cells. All but 2 received 100% of planned dose, with 2 (pts 01and 03) receiving 40% (3rd infusions held for fever). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 5 patients: 2 grade 3 requiring tocilizumab (pts 01 and 03), 1 grade 2, and 2 grade 1. High-grade CRS was associated with elevated levels of IL-6, IFNg, MCP1, MIG, IL2Ra, and IL-10, as seen in our acute lymphoblastic leukemia CTL019 trial (Teachey et al, 2016). There was 1 DLT: grade 4 PRES (posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome) in pt 03, with severe delirium, recurrent seizures, obtundation, and cerebral edema on MRI. This resolved after anti-epileptics, high-dose methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, without long-term neurologic sequelae. Other grade 3/4 toxicities to date include hypophosphatemia (n=3 pts), hypocalcemia (n=2), and anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypofibrinogenemia, fatigue, pneumonia, UTI, elevated Alk phos and AST, hypokalemia, hypertension, and pleural effusion (n=1 each). CART-BCMA cells were detected in blood and marrow by CAR-specific PCR in all 6 pts, and in 4/6 by flow cytometry, with 2 pts, 01 and 03, having massive CART expansion peaking at 90% and 76% of peripheral CD3+ T cells, respectively. CART-BCMA cells during peak expansion were predominantly CD8+ and highly activated. Pt 01 has ongoing CART-BCMA persistence, with ongoing stringent CR at 7 months and MRD-negative bone marrow by flow cytometry. Pt 03, who had pleural and possible dural MM involvement, had CART-BCMA cells found in pleural fluid and CSF, and achieved VGPR (IF+ only) with resolution of extramedullary disease on PET/CT scan. She progressed at 5 months, associated with significant reduction of CART-BCMA cells and loss of BCMA expression on her MM cells by flow cytometry, suggestive of antigen escape. Two pts (02, 11) had modest CART-BCMA expansion, with 1 minimal response (MR) lasting 2 months, and 1 ongoing MR 1 month post-infusion. Two pts (09, 10) had minimal expansion and no response. Soluble BCMA levels, which were elevated in all pts at baseline, declined in parallel with CART-BCMA expansion and correlated with depth of response, with an accompanying increase in previously suppressed BAFF and APRIL levels in serum. Conclusions: CART-BCMA cells can be manufactured from heavily-pretreated MM pts, and demonstrate promising in vivo expansion and clinical activity, even without lymphodepleting conditioning. Depth of response correlates with degree of CART-BCMA expansion and CRS. Toxicities to date include CRS and in 1 pt, severe reversible neurotoxicity, as described in other CAR T cell studies. Expanded accrual in cohort 1, as well as in cohorts with CTX conditioning, is ongoing, with updated data to be presented at the meeting. Table Table. Disclosures Cohen: Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Garfall:Bioinvent: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy. Stadtmauer:Novartis: Consultancy; Takada: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Lancaster:Janssen: Consultancy; Medimmune, Inc.: Consultancy; Grifols, Inc.: Other: Teaching courses. Vogl:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding. Ambrose:Novartis: Research Funding. Plesa:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kulikovskaya:Novartis: Research Funding. Weiss:Prothena: Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations. Richardson:Novartis: Employment, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Isaacs:Novartis: Employment. Melenhorst:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. June:Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Immunology, Research Funding; University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties; Tmunity: Equity Ownership, Other: Founder, stockholder ; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Immune Design: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Honoraria. Milone:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy with T-Cells Engineered with a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Bearing a Human CD19-Binding Single Chain Variable Fragment for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1415-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Kevin A. Hay ◽  
Alyssa Sheih ◽  
Barbara S. Pender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background We previously reported high response rates and durable remissions in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; Turtle, JCI 2016) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; Turtle, Sci Transl Med 2016) treated with CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T (CD19 CAR-T) cells. In a subset of pts, we identified CD8+ T cell responses to epitopes in the murine CD19-binding single chain variable fragment (scFv) of the CAR that could limit CAR-T cell persistence and responses to subsequent infusions. In an effort to reduce the potential for immune CAR-T cell rejection, the murine CD19-binding scFv of the CAR was replaced with a fully human scFv linked to 4-1BB and CD3z signaling domains (JCAR021; Sommermeyer, Leukemia 2017). Here we report the initial clinical results of immunotherapy with JCAR021. Methods We initiated a phase I trial investigating lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2/d and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d for 3 days (Cy/Flu) followed by infusion of JCAR021 in pts with R/R ALL and aggressive NHL (NCT03103971). Pts were enrolled into 1 of 3 cohorts: high marrow burden ALL (HMB; > 5% blasts in bone marrow [BM] before lymphodepletion); low marrow burden ALL (LMB; ≤ 5% blasts in BM before lymphodepletion); and NHL. The starting dose was 7x104 JCAR021 cells/kg for the HMB ALL cohort, and 7x105 JCAR021 cells/kg in both the LMB ALL and NHL cohorts. Dose escalation/de-escalation follows a modified toxicity probability interval algorithm (Guo, Contemp Clin Trials 2017). Responses in the NHL cohort and in the HMB/LMB ALL cohorts were determined by the Lugano criteria (Cheson, JCO 2014) and the 2018 NCCN guidelines, respectively. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded according to consensus criteria (Lee, Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity was graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results Pt characteristics are detailed in Table 1. As of June 15, 2018, 9 pts were enrolled on the trial. Two pts did not receive JCAR021: one pt was excluded after aggressive NHL was reclassified as indolent after pathology review and one pt had no detectable disease upon pre-treatment restaging. The 7 pts who received JCAR021 had a median age of 63 years (range: 29 - 69). Both pts in the LMB ALL cohort had bulky extramedullary disease (> 5 cm diameter). One patient (LMB ALL cohort) had failed two allogeneic transplants and one patient (HMB ALL cohort) had failed an allogeneic transplant prior to treatment with JCAR021. Four of 4 pts in the NHL cohort and 2 of 2 pts in the LMB ALL cohort received 7x105 JCAR021 cells/kg. The pt treated in the HMB ALL cohort received 7x104 JCAR021 cells/kg. No pt in any cohort developed grade ≥ 3 CRS. All ALL pts developed grade 2 CRS. No pts with NHL developed CRS; one pt in the NHL cohort who had CNS disease prior to CAR-T cell immunotherapy developed grade 3 neurotoxicity in the absence of CRS. We did not observe other neurologic events. No other grade ≥ 3 non-hematopoietic organ toxicity was observed and all 7 treated pts have completed response evaluation. Four weeks after infusion of a low dose of JCAR021, both patients in the LMB ALL cohort had undetectable marrow disease by high resolution flow cytometry and regression of bulky extramedullary disease (1 complete response [CR] and 1 partial response [PR] by PET-CT). One pt treated with a low dose (7x104 cells/kg) of JCAR021 in the HMB ALL cohort did not achieve CR (decrease in BM blasts from 79.8% to 29.5%) but CNS disease was cleared by flow cytometry. In the NHL cohort, we observed objective responses in 2 of 4 patients (1 CR, 1 PR). JCAR021 was detected in blood by flow cytometry and/or quantitative PCR for up to 112 days after infusion. Conclusion JCAR021 appears to have a favorable toxicity profile in R/R ALL and NHL pts. JCAR021 cells expanded in vivo and have persisted in all pts. We observed responses at very low doses of CAR-T cells in ALL pts with bulky disease. This trial continues to enroll to define optimal dosing and determine the safety and efficacy of JCAR021. Disclosures Hirayama: DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Hay:DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Till:Mustang Bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kiem:Homology Medicine: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Shadman:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mustang: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Cassaday:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Acharya:Teva: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding. Riddell:NOHLA: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Maloney:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria. Turtle:Aptevo: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics / Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) after Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CLL

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1983-1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Porter ◽  
Simon F. Lacey ◽  
Wei-Ting Hwang ◽  
Pamela Shaw ◽  
Noelle V. Frey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
Car T ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Guide Intervention

Abstract CTL019 are autologous T cells genetically modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) consisting of an external anti-CD19 domain with the CD3z and 4-1BB signaling domains, and mediate potent anti-tumor effects in patients (pts) with advanced, R/R CLL, ALL and NHL. CRS is the most serious toxicity of CTL019 therapy; symptoms can include fevers, nausea, myalgias, capillary leak, hypoxia, and hypotension. Standard CRS grading criteria are not applicable to CAR T cell therapies. To better capture clinical manifestations of CRS and guide intervention after CTL019, we devised a novel CRS grading scale. that was applied to 40 pts treated with CTL019 for R/R CLL; 14 pts on an initial pilot and 26 pts on an ongoing dose-optimization trial (reported separately). Our new CRS grading system is shown below. Pts were 80% male, a median age of 65 (range 51-78) and received a median of 4 prior therapies (range 1-10). 41% had known mutation at p53. 83% of 24 pts tested had unmutated IgVH. Response rate to CTL019 (CR+PR) was 42%. CRS was the major toxicity and occurred in 57% (23/40) of pts. CRS was gr 1 in 10%, gr 2 in 17%, gr 3 in 15% and gr 4 in 15%. Development of CRS correlated with response; 13/23 (57%) pts with CRS responded versus 4/17 (24%) pts without CRS responded (p=0.05). CRS was associated with elevations in IL-6, IFN-g, and other cytokines; details for 33 pts will be presented. Peak fold-increase over baseline for IL-6 was a median of 10.6x (range 0.28–649) and for IFN- g a median of 32.9x (1–7243x). For pts with CRS, this increase in IL-6 was a median of 23.5x compared to 1.86x in pts without CRS (p=0.001); and in IFN- g was a median of 97.2xin pts with CRS compared to 24.2x without (p=0.018). Increasing CRS severity was associated with peak fold change in IL-6 (p< 0.0001) and IFN- g (p=0.015). Notably, unlike cytokine changes associated with sepsis, TNF-a did not markedly increase during CRS. CRS occurred with a consistent and often dramatic increase in ferritin, C reactive protein (CRP), and hemophagocytosis, suggesting concurrent macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Increasing CRS severity was associated with an increasing trend for peak ferritin (log scale, p<0.001) and peak CRP (p<0.001). The median peak ferritin was 13,463 ng/ml in pts with CRS compared to 378 in pts without (p<0.001). Median peak CRP was 16 mg/dl in pts with CRS compared to 3.86 in pts without (p=0.002). CRS required intervention in 8 pts. 1 pt was successfully treated with corticosteroids. Given marked increases in IL-6, 7 patients received the IL6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab with or without corticosteroids with resolution of CRS. Tocilizumab was given to 1/7 pts with gr 2 CRS, 1/6 pts with gr 3 and 5/6 pts with gr 4. Several pts also received corticosteroids and/or etanercept. All pts had resolution of CRS signs with no TRM from CRS. CRS is the most significant complication of CTL019 and can be life threatening. A novel CRS grading system was needed to identify CRS severity more accurately guide intervention timing. CTL019-related CRS is associated with a unique cytokine profile and has been manageable with anti-cytokine therapy in pts with R/R CLL. CRS appears to correlate with response of CLL to CTL019. Further study is needed to develop reliable methods to predict severity and minimize CRS toxicity without inhibiting anti-leukemia activity of CTL019. New CRS Grading System for CTL019 Abstract 1983. Table Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Mild: Treated with supportive care such as anti-pyretics, anti-emetics Moderate: Requiring IV therapies or parenteral nutrition; some signs of organ dysfunction (i.e. gr 2 Cr or gr 3 LFTs) related to CRS and not attributable to any other condition. Hospitalization for management of CRS related symptoms including fevers with associated neutropenia. More severe: Hospitalization required for management of symptoms related to organ dysfunction including gr 4 LFTs or gr 3 Cr related to CRS and not attributable to any other conditions; this excludes management of fever or myalgias. Includes hypotension treated with IV fluids or low-dose pressors, coagulopathy requiring FFP or cryoprecipitate, and hypoxia requiring supplemental O2 (nasal cannula oxygen, high flow 02, CPAP or BiPAP). Pts admitted for management of suspected infection due to fevers and/or neutropenia may have gr 2 CRS. Life-threatening complications such as hypotension requiring “high dose pressors”, hypoxia requiring mechanical ventilation. Disclosures Porter: Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Genentech (spouse employment): Employment. Off Label Use: Use of genetically modified T cells (CTL019) to treat CLL and use of tocilizumab to treat cytokine release syndrome.. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Hwang:NVS: Research Funding. Frey:Novartis: Research Funding. Chew:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Chen:Novartis: Research Funding. Kalos:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gonzalez:Novartis: Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. Litchman:Novartis: Employment. Shen:Novartis: Employment. Quintas-Cardamas:Novartis: Employment. Wood:Novartis Pharma: Employment. Levine:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. June:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Research Funding.

Pre-Emptive Donor Lymphocyte Infusion with CD19-Directed, CAR-Modified T Cells Infused after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients with Advanced CD19+ Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 862-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Stefan O. Ciurea ◽  
Mary Helen Huls ◽  
Harjeet Singh ◽  
Simon Olivares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
Lymphoid Malignancies ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be curative in a subset of patients with advanced lymphoid malignancies but relapse remains a major reason for treatment failure. Donor-derived, non-specific lymphocyte infusions (DLI) can confer an immune anti-malignancy effect but can be complicated by graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells directed toward CD19 have demonstrated dramatic efficacy in patients with refractory ALL and NHL. However, responses are often associated with life-threatening cytokine release syndrome. Aim: We hypothesized that infusing CAR-modified, CD19-specific T-cells after HCT as a directed DLI would be associated with a low rate of GVHD, better disease control, and a less severe cytokine release syndrome since administered in a minimal disease state. Methods: We employed a non-viral gene transfer using the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon/transposase system to stably express a CD19-specific CAR (designated CD19RCD28 that activates via CD3z & CD28) in donor-derived T cells for patients with advanced CD19+ lymphoid malignancies. T-cells were electroporated using a Nucleofector device to synchronously introduce two DNA plasmids coding for SB transposon (CD19RCD28) and hyperactive SB transposase (SB11). T-cells stably expressing the CAR were retrieved over 28 days of co-culture by recursive additions of g-irradiated activating and propagating cells (AaPC) in presence of soluble recombinant interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-21. The AaPC were derived from K562 cells and genetically modified to co-express CD19 as well as the co-stimulatory molecules CD86, CD137L, and a membrane-bound version of IL-15. Results: To date, we have successfully treated 21 patients with median age 36 years (range 21-62) with advanced CD19+ ALL (n=18) or NHL (n=3); 10 patients had active disease at time of HCT. Donor-derived CAR+ T cells (HLA-matched sibling n=10; 1 Ag mismatched sibling n=1; haplo family n=8; cord blood n=2) were infused at a median 64 days (range 42-91 days) following HCT to prevent disease progression. Transplant preparative regimens were myeloablative, busulfan-based (n=10) or reduced intensity, fludarabine-based (n=11). All patients were maintained on GVHD prophylaxis at time of CAR T-cell infusion with tacrolimus, plus mycophenolate mofeteil for cord, plus post-HCT cyclophosphamide for haplo donors. The starting CAR+ T-cell dose was 106 (n=7), escalated to 107 (n=6), 5x107 (n=5), and currently at 108 (n=3) modified T cells/m2 (based on recipient body surface area). Patients have not demonstrated any acute or late toxicity to CAR+ T cell infusions. Three patients developed acute grades 2-4 GVHD (liver n=1, upper GI n=1, skin=1) which was within the expected range after allogeneic HCT alone. Of note, the rate of CMV reactivation after CAR T cell infusion was 24% vs. 41 % previously reported for our patients without CAR T cell infusion (Wilhelm et al. J Oncol Parm Practice, 2014, 20:257). Nineteen patients have had at least 30 days follow-up post CAR T-cell infusion and are evaluable for disease progression. Forty-eight percent of patients (n=10) remain alive and in complete remission (CR) at median 5.2 months (range 0-21.3 months) following CAR T cell infusion. Importantly, among 8 patients who received haplo-HCT and CAR, 7 remain in remission at median 4.2 months. Conclusion: We demonstrate that infusing donor-derived CD19-specific CAR+ T cells, using the SB and AaPC platform, in the adjuvant HCT setting as pre-emptive DLI may provide an effective and safe approach for maintaining remission in patients at high risk for relapse. Graft-vs-host disease did not appear increased by administration of the donor derived CAR-T cells. Furthermore, the add-back of allogeneic T cells appears to have contributed to immune reconstitution and control of opportunistic viral infection. Disclosures Huls: Intrexon and Ziopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership. Singh:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Olivares:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Su:Ziopharm and Intrexon: Employment. Figliola:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Kumar:Ziopharm and Intrexon: Equity Ownership. Jena:Ziopharm Oncology: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Potential roylaties (Patent submitted); Intrexon: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Potential royalties (Patent submitted). Ang:Intrexon and Ziopharm: Equity Ownership. Lee:Intrexon: Equity Ownership; Cyto-Sen: Equity Ownership; Ziopharm: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals T Cells Expressing an Anti-B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) Chimeric Antigen Receptor with a Fully-Human Heavy-Chain-Only Antigen Recognition Domain Induce Remissions in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3230-3230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lekha Mikkilineni ◽  
Elisabet E. Manasanch ◽  
Norris Lam ◽  
Danielle Vanasse ◽  
Jennifer N. Brudno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
B Cell Maturation ◽  
Car T ◽  
Post Infusion ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells expressing B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) can target and kill multiple myeloma (MM). BCMA was chosen as a target for MM because it is expressed by almost all cases of MM but has a restricted expression pattern on normal cells. CAR antigen-recognition domains made up of monoclonal antibody-derived, single-chain-variable fragments (scFv) are potentially immunogenic. To reduce the risk of recipient immune responses against CAR T cells, we used the sequence of a novel anti-BCMA, fully-human, heavy-chain-only binding domain designated FHVH33. The FHVH33 binding domain sequence was from TeneoBio, Inc. FHVH33 is smaller than a scFv. FHVH33 lacks the light chain, artificial linker sequence, and 2 associated junctions of a scFv, so it is predicted to be less immunogenic than a scFv, especially murine-derived scFvs. We constructed a CAR incorporating FHVH33, CD8α hinge and transmembrane domains, a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, and a CD3ζ T-cell activation domain. The CAR, FHVH33-CD8BBZ, is encoded by a γ-retroviral vector. FHVH33-CD8BBZ-expressing T cells (FHVH-BCMA-T) exhibited a full range of T-cell functions in vitro and eliminated tumors and disseminated malignancy in mice (Lam et al, Blood (ASH abstract) 2017 vol 130: 504). We are conducting the first clinical trial of FHVH-BCMA-T. Patients receive conditioning chemotherapy on days -5 to -3 with 300 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 30 mg/m2 of fludarabine followed by infusion of FHVH-BCMA-T on day 0. This dose-escalation trial has 5 planned dose levels (DL). Twelve patients have received FHVH-BCMA-T on 3 DLs, 0.75x106, 1.5x106 and 3x106 CAR+ T cells/kg of bodyweight. Three patients were enrolled on the trial but not treated. The median age of patients enrolled was 63 (range 52-70); patients received a median of 6 lines of anti-myeloma therapy (range 3-10) prior to treatment with FHVH-BCMA-T. Ten patients out of 12 patients have achieved objective responses (OR). Five patients have obtained CRs or VGPRs to date. One patient achieved a partial remission (PR) 26 weeks after FHVH-BCMA-T infusion through a continued decrease in a measurable plasmacytoma. Five out of 7 patients who had myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics had an OR (Table). ORs occurred in patients with large soft-tissue plasmacytomas. Loss of BCMA expression on myeloma cells after treatment was documented in 2 patients. Two patients who developed progressive MM after CAR T-cell infusion had evidence of minimal residual disease in bone marrow 1-2 months post infusion of CAR T cells (patients 7,8). Eleven out of 12 patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS); CRS grades ranged from 1-3 (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 25 (2019) 625-638). The median peak C reactive protein (CRP) of the patients with CRS was 156.3 mg/L. Of 12 patients, 1 received the interleukin-6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab on day +6 to treat grade 3 CRS with hypotension requiring low-dose pressor therapy, grade 2 ejection fraction (EF) decrease and elevation of creatinine kinase (CK). All parameters returned to baseline by day +10. Patient 12 had a grade 3 decrease in EF which resolved by day +29. Two patients had grade 2 neurotoxicity that resolved without intervention: patient 3 had headaches, dysarthria and word-finding difficulties that resolved after 6 days while patient 6 had headaches on day +4. Patient 12 had grade 3 neurotoxicity with confusion on day +2; she was given dexamethasone with improvement in mental status the same day. After attaining a response, patient 6 died from influenza complications 6 weeks after FHVH-BCMA-T infusion. A median of 10.6% (range 1.1-46) of bone marrow T cells were CAR+ when assessed 14 days after FHVH-BCMA-T infusion. We assessed blood CAR+ cells by quantitative PCR. The median peak level of CAR+ cells was 76.5 cells/µl (range 3-347 cells/µl) and the median day post-infusion of peak blood CAR+ cell levels was 13 (range 9-14). The results from this phase 1 trial demonstrate that FHVH-BCMA-T cells can induce responses at low dose levels. Patients who had no CRS or low-grade CRS achieved objective responses. Toxicity was limited and reversible. Accrual to this trial continues. A maximum tolerated dose has not been determined yet. These results encourage further development of FHVH CAR-T. Table Disclosures Manasanch: Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Skyline Diagnostics: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Quest Diagnostics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Trinklein:Teneobio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Buelow:Teneobio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kochenderfer:Kite and Celgene: Research Funding; Bluebird and CRISPR Therapeutics: Other: received royalties on licensing of his inventions. OffLabel Disclosure: Cyclophosphamide and fludarabine are used in combination for conditioning chemotherapy prior to CAR T-cell infusion

CAR-T Therapy for Lymphoma with Prophylactic Tocilizumab: Decreased Rates of Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome without Excessive Neurologic Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo F Caimi ◽  
Ashish Sharma ◽  
Patricio Rojas ◽  
Seema Patel ◽  
Jane Reese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Car T

INTRODUCTION: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have demonstrated activity against relapsed/refractory lymphomas. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and CAR-T related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES/ICANS) are well-known complications of CAR-T cell therapy. Tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor, is approved for treatment of CRS. Our institutional standard was modified to administer prophylactic tocilizumab before infusion CAR-T cell products. We present the outcomes of subjects treated with locally manufactured antiCD19 CAR-T cells (TNFRSF19 transmembrane domain, CD3Zeta/4-1BB costimulatory signaling) with and without prophylactic tocilizumab. METHODS: Relapsed / refractory (r/r) lymphoma patients (pts) treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells at our institution were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as laboratory results were obtained from our Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Therapy Database. Prior to institution of prophylactic tocilizumab, pts received this agent only if they presented evidence of CRS grade 2 or higher. In May 2019, our institutional practice changed to provide tocilizumab 8mg/kg, 1 hour prior to infusion of CAR-T cell product. CRS was measured according to the ASTCT Consensus Grading, whereas CRES was measured using the CARTOX-10 criteria. Comparisons between groups were done with the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Twenty-three relapsed / refractory lymphoma pts were treated with antiCD19 CAR-T cells; 15 pts received prophylactic tocilizumab. Median follow up was 312 days (range 64 - 679) days. Baseline characteristics are listed in table 1. Both groups were similar: There were no statistically differences in the rate of bulky, refractory disease, prior ASCT or number or prior lines of therapy. Baseline lymphocyte counts, C - reactive protein (CRP) and were also comparable between groups (Table 2). We did not observe immune adverse reactions to tocilizumab infusion. There were no differences in the incidence of cytopenias or infectious complications between groups. CRS of any grade was observed in 6/8 (75%) of pts without prophylactic tocilizumab vs. 6/15 (40%) in pts treated with prophylactic tocilizumab (p = 0.23), whereas CRS grade &gt;1 was observed in 5 pts (62.5%) without prophylactic tocilizumab and in 3 pts (20%) treated with prophylactic tocilizumab (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of all grade CRES (no prophylaxis, 3/8 [38%] pts; prophylaxis 5/15 [30%] pts, p = 0.2969). There was a statistically significant difference in the peak CRP and peak ferritin without difference in the peak lymphocyte count after CAR-T infusion (Table 2, Figure 1). Patients given prophylactic tocilizumab had higher IL-6 plasma concentrations on day 2 after infusion (Figure 2). Complete response was observed in 4/8 (50%) pts without prophylactic tocilizumab vs. 12/15 (80%) pts with prophylactic tocilizumab (p = 0.18). All pts had detectable Anti-CD19 CAR-T cells on day 30, both groups had peak CAR-T expansion on day 14, with no statistically significant differences in expansion rates between groups. All evaluable subjects have had CAR-T persistence on days 60, 90, 180, and 365. CONCLUSIONS: Use of prophylactic tocilizumab prior to infusion of antiCD19 CAR-T cells is associated with reduced incidence of severe CRS and decreased levels of clinical laboratory markers of inflammation, despite increases in plasma concentration of IL-6. This decreased rate of grade ≥2 CRS is not associated with impaired disease control and did not result in increased rates of neurologic toxicity. Prophylactic tocilizumab does not appear to affect CAR-T cell expansion or persistence. Figure 1 Disclosures Caimi: ADC therapeutics: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board; Kite pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board. Worden:Lentigen, a Miltenyi biotec company: Current Employment. Kadan:Lentigen, a Miltenyi biotec company: Current Employment. Orentas:Lentigen Technology, a Miltenyi Biotec Company: Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen, a Miltenyi Biotec Company: Current Employment, Patents & Royalties: CAR-T immunotherapy. de Lima:Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Personal fees, advisory board, Research Funding; Kadmon: Other: Personal Fees, Advisory board; Incyte: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board; BMS: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board. OffLabel Disclosure: Use of tocilizumab as prophylaxis for CRS is not approved, whereas use for treatment is approved and on label.

scholarly journals Cytokine release syndrome and neurological event costs in lisocabtagene maraleucel–treated patients in the TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1695-1705
Author(s):  
Jeremy S. Abramson ◽  
Tanya Siddiqi ◽  
Jacob Garcia ◽  
Christine Dehner ◽  
Yeonhee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated high response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL); however, these therapies are associated with 2 CAR T cell–specific potentially severe adverse events (AEs): cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs). This study estimated the management costs associated with CRS/NEs among patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL using data from the pivotal TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial of lisocabtagene maraleucel, an investigational CD19-directed defined composition CAR T-cell product with a 4-1BB costimulation domain administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells. This retrospective analysis of patients from TRANSCEND with prospectively identified CRS and/or NE episodes examined relevant trial-observed health care resource utilization (HCRU) associated with toxicity management based on the severity of the event from the health care system perspective. Cost estimates for this analysis were taken from publicly available databases and published literature. Of 268 treated patients as of April 2019, 127 (47.4%) experienced all-grade CRS and/or NEs, which were predominantly grade ≤2 (77.2%). Median total AE management costs ranged from $1930 (grade 1 NE) to $177 343 (concurrent grade ≥3 CRS and NE). Key drivers of cost were facility expenses, including intensive care unit and other inpatient hospitalization lengths of stay. HCRU and costs were significantly greater among patients with grade ≥3 AEs (22.8%). Therefore, CAR T-cell therapies with a low incidence of severe CRS/NEs will likely reduce HCRU and costs associated with managing patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. This clinical trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02631044.

scholarly journals B-CLL Mediated Resistance to CAR T Cell Therapy Via Insufficient Activation Is CAR-Independent

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
McKensie Collins ◽  
Weimin Kong ◽  
Inyoung Jung ◽  
Stefan M Lundh ◽  
J. Joseph Melenhorst
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cytokine Production ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a B cell malignancy that accounts for nearly 1/3rd of adult leukemia diagnoses in the Western world. Conventional chemo-immunotherapies initially control progression, but in the absence of curative options patients ultimately succumb to their disease. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is potentially curative, but only 26% of CLL patients have a complete response. CLL-stimulated T cells have reduced effector functions and B-CLL cells themselves are believed to be immunosuppressive. Our work demonstrates that insufficient activation of CAR T cells by CLL cells mediates some of these effects and that the results are conserved between ROR1- and CD19-targeting CARs. Results: In this study we used an in vitro system to model the in vivo anti-tumor response in which CAR T cells serially engage with CLL cells. Multiple stimulations of CD19 or ROR1-targeting CAR T cells with primary CLL cells recapitulated many aspects of known T cell dysfunction including reduced proliferation, cytokine production, and activation. While the initial stimulation induced low level proliferation, subsequent stimulations failed to elicit additional effector functions. We further found that these functional defects were not permanent, and that CAR T cell function could be restored by switching to a stimulus with an aAPC (artificial Antigen Presenting Cell) control cell line. The aAPCs are well-characterized as potent stimulators of CAR T cell effector responses. Flow cytometry revealed that CLL-stimulated CAR T cells retained a non-activated, baseline differentiation profile, suggesting that CLL cells fail to stimulate CAR T cells rather than rendering them non-functional. One mechanism that could dampen activation is immune suppression. We assessed this at a high level by stimulating CAR T cells with CLL cells and aAPCs mixed at known ratios. However, even cultures containing 75% CLL cells stimulated proliferation and cytokine production. Extensive immune-phenotyping revealed high level expression of the IL-2 Receptor on 90% (18/20) of the B-CLL cells tested. Since cytokine sinking via IL-2 receptor expression is a well-known mechanism of regulatory T cell suppression, we hypothesized that CLL cells similarly sink IL-2, blunting T cell activation. To test this, we supplemented IL-2 into CLL/CAR T cell co-cultures and showed that this rescued proliferation but only partially restored cytokine production. In contrast to our hypothesis, analysis of cytokine production by flow cytometry showed that CLL-stimulated CAR T cells did not produce IL-2 following a 6- or 12-hour stimulus, but TNFα was expressed after 12-hours. Similarly, CAR T cell degranulation, a prerequisite for target cell lysis was triggered after CLL recognition. These data again suggested that CLL cells insufficiently stimulate CAR T cell cytokine production, but also showed that cytolytic activity against CLL cells is intact. We further proposed that CLL cells express insufficient levels of co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules to activate CAR T cells. Flow cytometry showed that most CLL cells expressed co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules at low levels; we hypothesized that up-regulating these molecules would enhance CAR T cell targeting of CLL cells. CLL cells were activated with CD40L and IL-4, which increased expression of CD54, CD58, CD80, and CD86. Stimulating CAR T cells with activated CLL cells enhanced CAR T cell proliferation and induced cell conjugate formation, indicating cell activation. Therefore, improving CLL stimulatory capacity can rescue T cell dysfunctions. To assess whether IL-2 addition and CD40 ligation were synergistic, we combined the two assays; however, we saw no additional improvement over IL-2 addition alone, suggesting that the two interventions may act upon the same pathway. Importantly, we also showed that rescue of CAR T cell function via IL-2 addition or CD40 ligation was not CAR-specific, as we observed the functional defects and subsequent rescue with both a ROR1-targeting CAR and the gold standard CD19-targeting CAR. Conclusions: Together, these data show that CAR T cell "defects" in CLL are actually insufficient activation, and improving the stimulatory capacity of CLL cells may enable better clinical responses. Further, this effect is not CAR-specific and these results may therefore be broadly applicable to multiple therapies for this disease. Disclosures Melenhorst: IASO Biotherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Speaker, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Other: Speaker; Simcere of America: Consultancy; Poseida Therapeutics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Combination of NKTR-255, a Polymer Conjugated Human IL-15, with CD19 CAR T Cell Immunotherapy in a Preclinical Lymphoma Model

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2866-2866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassie Chou ◽  
Simon Fraessle ◽  
Rachel Steinmetz ◽  
Reed M. Hawkins ◽  
Tinh-Doan Phi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Board Member ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background CD19 CAR T immunotherapy has been successful in achieving durable remissions in some patients with relapsed/refractory B cell lymphomas, but disease progression and loss of CAR T cell persistence remains problematic. Interleukin 15 (IL-15) is known to support T cell proliferation and survival, and therefore may enhance CAR T cell efficacy, however, utilizing native IL-15 is challenging due to its short half-life and poor tolerability in the clinical setting. NKTR-255 is a polymer-conjugated IL-15 that retains binding affinity to IL15Rα and exhibits reduced clearance, providing sustained pharmacodynamic responses. We investigated the effects of NKTR-255 on human CD19 CAR T cells both in vitro and in an in vivo xenogeneic B cell lymphoma model and found improved survival of lymphoma bearing mice receiving NKTR-255 and CAR T cells compared to CAR T cells alone. Here, we extend upon these findings to further characterize CAR T cells in vivo and examine potential mechanisms underlying improved anti-tumor efficacy. Methods CD19 CAR T cells incorporating 4-1BB co-stimulation were generated from CD8 and CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors. For in vitro studies, CAR T cells were incubated with NKTR-255 or native IL-15 with and without CD19 antigen. STAT5 phosphorylation, CAR T cell phenotype and CFSE dilution were assessed by flow cytometry and cytokine production by Luminex. For in vivo studies, NSG mice received 5x105 Raji lymphoma cells IV on day (D)-7 and a subtherapeutic dose (0.8x106) of CAR T cells (1:1 CD4:CD8) on D0. To determine optimal start date of NKTR-255, mice were treated weekly starting on D-1, 7, or 14 post CAR T cell infusion. Tumors were assessed by bioluminescence imaging. Tumor-free mice were re-challenged with Raji cells. For necropsy studies mice received NKTR-255 every 7 days following CAR T cell infusion and were euthanized at various timepoints post CAR T cell infusion. Results Treatment of CD8 and CD4 CAR T cells in vitro with NKTR-255 resulted in dose dependent STAT5 phosphorylation and antigen independent proliferation. Co-culture of CD8 CAR T cells with CD19 positive targets and NKTR-255 led to enhanced proliferation, expansion and TNFα and IFNγ production, particularly at lower effector to target ratios. Further studies showed that treatment of CD8 CAR T cells with NKTR-255 led to decreased expression of activated caspase 3 and increased expression of bcl-2. In Raji lymphoma bearing NSG mice, administration of NKTR-255 in combination with CAR T cells increased peak CAR T cell numbers, Ki-67 expression and persistence in the bone marrow compared to mice receiving CAR T cells alone. There was a higher percentage of EMRA like (CD45RA+CCR7-) CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells in NKTR-255 treated mice compared to mice treated with CAR T cells alone and persistent CAR T cells in mice treated with NKTR-255 were able to reject re-challenge of Raji tumor cells. Additionally, starting NKTR-255 on D7 post T cell infusion resulted in superior tumor control and survival compared to starting NKTR-255 on D-1 or D14. Conclusion Administration of NKTR-255 in combination with CD19 CAR T cells leads to improved anti-tumor efficacy making NKTR-255 an attractive candidate for enhancing CAR T cell therapy in the clinic. Disclosures Chou: Nektar Therapeutics: Other: Travel grant. Fraessle:Technical University of Munich: Patents & Royalties. Busch:Juno Therapeutics/Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership; Technical University of Munich: Patents & Royalties. Miyazaki:Nektar Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marcondes:Nektar Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Riddell:Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Lyell Immunopharma: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Turtle:Allogene: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Humanigen: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Nektar Therapeutics: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; T-CURX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor with staff from Juno Therapeutics; pending, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member.

Evaluation of Immune Mechanisms to Understand Idelalislib-Associated Diarrhea-Colitis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5588-5588
Author(s):  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Michael Hallek ◽  
Jeffrey P. Sharman ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
Andrew D. Zelenetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
T Cell Subsets ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Temporal Profiles ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA) is a selective, small molecule inhibitor of PI3Kd that has shown significant efficacy in treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). A common adverse event (AE) observed in IDELA studies is diarrhea/colitis (DC): grade ≥3 ~15%. Published preclinical data suggests that PI3Kd plays a critical role in regulating the function and development of regulatory T-cells (T-regs). This biomarker analysis aimed to evaluate possible immune mechanisms that may have contributed to DC in IDELA-treated pts. Methods: Longitudinal absolute peripheral blood T (CD4+ and CD8+), NK (CD16+/CD56+) cell subsets, cytokines, and chemokine levels from patients treated with IDELA were analyzed (Table 1). Since absolute numbers of T-reg cells were not available, we utilized epigenetic qPCR method (Kleen T. et. al. J Immunother Cancer 2015) to assess the status of T-regs by quantifying FOXP3 utilizing banked peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The following cytokines and chemokines were measured: IL-12p40, IL-17A, IFNγ, TNFα, G- CSF, MIP1α (CCL3), CCL5 (RANTES), IL-10, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-15, CRP, and IP-10 (CXCL10). We evaluated the association of changes from baseline of these biomarker(s) with the occurrence and severity of DC events during IDELA treatment. Association of cytomegalovirus (CMV) with DC was not addressed in this study and is being presented separately. Results: There were no differences in absolute numbers of T (CD4+ or CD8+) and NK cells between pts treated with IDELA in both trials with grade ≥3 DC vs those with no DC. Consistently, results from epigenetic qPCR analysis also demonstrated no differences in temporal profiles for peripheral T-cell subsets (CD3+, CD8+, or FOXP3+) in CLL pts treated with IDELA with grade ≥3 DC vs no DC. Baseline and on-treatment changes in peripheral T-cell subsets were not predictive of DC. Analysis of T-cell subsets from the visit immediately prior (t-1) to the first occurrence of grade ≥3 DC was not predictive, and revealed no differences compared to pts with no DC. Lower levels of CD3+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ were noted longitudinally as well as at t-1 visits in grade 1/2 DC vs non-DC pts, but these changes were not predictive of grade 1/2 DC. Increased levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-15, IFN-γ, and CLL5) were noted in both CLL and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) pts treated with IDELA. IL-17A level was significantly higher at the t-1 visit in CLL pts with grade ≥3 DC vs no DC. However, Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis deemed that neither individual cytokine/chemokine or in combination was not predictive for DC occurrence. CLL/iNHL pts with grade ≥3 DC vs no DC were noted to have higher on treatment IL-8. CLL pts presented lower baseline IL-6 and G-CSF levels in patients with grade ≥3 DC vs no DC (Table 2). There were no associations between baseline circulating plasma markers and DC in pts with iNHL. Conclusion: With currently available data, no single circulating immune biomarker is associated with or is predictive for the development of DC during treatment with IDELA. Lower levels of CD3+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ were noted longitudinally in grade 1/2 DC vs no DC pts. No differences were observed in temporal profiles for T-cell subsets in pts with grade ≥3 DC vs those with no DC. However, higher on-treatment IL-8 and lower baseline IL-6 and G-CSF were noted in the relapsed CLL pts with grade ≥3 DC when compared with no DC pts. While quantitative analysis of these T-cell subsets was not associated with grade ≥3 DC, the qualitative function of T-cells may play a role in mediating DC. Functional assays for T-cells were not explored in this study. In addition, our concurrent analysis of colonic biopsies and association with CMV in pts with IDELA associated DC will be presented separately. Disclosures Furman: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hallek:Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sharman:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Zelenetz:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Jurczak:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Munugalavadla:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xiao:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zheng:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rao:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dreiling:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salles:Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Durable Clinical Responses in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results from a Multicenter Study of bb2121 Anti-Bcma CAR T Cell Therapy

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 740-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Yi Lin ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Nikhil Munshi ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have demonstrated robust and sustained clinical responses in several hematologic malignancies. Data suggest that achieving acceptable benefit:risk profiles depends on several factors, including the specificity of the antigen target and characteristics of the CAR itself, including on-target, off-tumor activity.To test the safety and efficacy of CAR T cells in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), we have designed a second-generation CAR construct targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) to redirect T cells to MM cells. BCMA is a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily that is expressed primarily by malignant myeloma cells, plasma cells, and some mature B cells. bb2121 consists of autologous T cells transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding a novel CAR incorporating an anti-BCMA scFv, a 4-1BB costimulatory motif and a CD3-zeta T cell activation domain. Methods: CRB-401 (NCT02658929) is a multi-center phase 1 dose escalation trial of bb2121 in patients with RRMM who have received ≥ 3 prior regimens, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent, or are double-refractory, and have ≥ 50% BCMA expression on malignant cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are collected via leukapheresis and shipped to a central facility for transduction, expansion, and release testing prior to being returned to the site for infusion. Patients undergo lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) daily for 3 days then receive 1 infusion of bb2121. The study follows a standard 3+3 design with planned dose levels of 50, 150, 450, 800, and 1,200 x 106 CAR+ T cells. The primary outcome measure is incidence of adverse events (AEs), including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Additional outcome measures were quality and duration of clinical response assessed according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma, evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD), overall and progression-free survival, quantification of bb2121 in blood, and quantification of circulating soluble BCMA over time. Results: Asof May 4, 2017, 21 patients (median 58 [37 to 74] years old) with a median of 5 (1 to 16) years since MM diagnosis, had been infused with bb2121, and 18 patients were evaluable for initial (1-month) clinical response. Patients had a median of 7 prior lines of therapy (range 3 to 14), all with prior autologous stem cell transplant; 67% had high-risk cytogenetics. Fifteen of 21 (71%) had prior exposure to, and 6 of 21 (29%) were refractory to 5 prior therapies (Bort/Len/Car/Pom/Dara). Median follow-up after bb2121 infusion was 15.4 weeks (range 1.4 to 54.4 weeks). As of data cut-off, no DLTs and no treatment-emergent Grade 3 or higher neurotoxicities similar to those reported in other CAR T clinical studies had been observed. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), primarily Grade 1 or 2, was reported in 15 of 21 (71%) patients: 2 patients had Grade 3 CRS that resolved in 24 hours and 4 patients received tocilizumab, 1 with steroids, to manage CRS. CRS was more common in the higher dose groups but did not appear related to tumor burden. One death on study, due to cardiopulmonary arrest more than 4 months after bb2121 infusion in a patient with an extensive cardiac history, was observed while the patient was in sCR and was assessed as unrelated to bb2121. The overall response rate (ORR) was 89% and increased to 100% for patients treated with doses of 150 x 106 CAR+ T cells or higher. No patients treated with doses of 150 x 106 CAR+ T cells or higher had disease progression, with time since bb2121 between 8 and 54 weeks (Table 1). MRD negative results were obtained in all 4 patients evaluable for analysis. CAR+ T cell expansion has been demonstrated consistently and 3 of 5 patients evaluable for CAR+ cells at 6 months had detectable vector copies. A further 5 months of follow up on reported results and initial data from additional patients will be presented. Conclusions: bb2121 shows promising efficacy at dose levels above 50 x 106 CAR+ T cells, with manageable CRS and no DLTs to date. ORR was 100% at these dose levels with 8 ongoing clinical responses at 6 months and 1 patient demonstrating a sustained response beyond one year. These initial data support the potential of CAR T therapy with bb2121 as a new treatment paradigm in RRMM. CT.gov study NCT02658929, sponsored by bluebird bio and Celgene Disclosures Berdeja: Teva: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding. Siegel: Celgene, Takeda, Amgen Inc, Novartis and BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Jagannath: MMRF: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau. Turka: bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lam: bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hege: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Morgan: bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Quigley: bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Kochenderfer: Bluebird bio: Research Funding; N/A: Patents & Royalties: I have multiple patents in the CAR field.; Kite Pharma: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document