MAGNIFY: Phase IIIb Randomized Study of Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab (R2) Followed By Lenalidomide Vs. Rituximab Maintenance in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular, Marginal Zone, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1798-1798 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Andorsky ◽  
Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽  
Jacob D. Bitran ◽  
Jason Melear ◽  
Heather D. Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance ◽  
Phase Iiib ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background:Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct and immune-mediated mechanisms of action, as well as clinical activity in NHL. Recent studies in frontline and relapsed/refractory NHL show high activity for lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2), supporting further study of this combination. Methods: MAGNIFY (NCT01996865) is a phase IIIb, multicenter, open-label study of subjects with grades 1-3b FL (including transformed lymphoma [TL]), MZL, or MCL who received >=1 prior therapy and had stage I-IV, measurable disease (>1.5 cm). Subjects received 12 cycles of R2 induction, consisting of oral lenalidomide 20 mg/day, days 1-21 per 28-day cycle (d1-21/28) plus intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 (28-day cycles). Subjects with stable disease (SD) or better after induction were then were randomized 1:1 to R2 vs. rituximab maintenance. Stratification to the 2 maintenance arms was based on histology (FL grade 1-3b and TL vs. MZL vs. MCL), number of prior lines of antilymphoma therapy (<=2 vs. >2), and age (<65 vs. >=65 years).Maintenance R2 consisted of lenalidomide 10 mg/day, d1-21/28, cycles 13-30 plus rituximab 375 mg/m2, day 1 of cycles 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, and 29 (Arm A). Rituximab maintenance alone was on the same schedule (Arm B). Subjects receiving R2 maintenance after 18 cycles are eligible to continue maintenance lenalidomide monotherapy 10 mg/day, d1-21/28 (optional per subject and/or investigator discretion) until disease progression as tolerated. The primary endpoint isprogression-free survival (PFS) comparing maintenance arms using a two-sided test with alpha=0.05 and HR=0.67. Secondary endpoints include safety, overall survival, and response rates. Efficacy is evaluated per modified 1999 IWG criteria and safety per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results: As of Jan 11, 2016, 135 subjects have been enrolled, including 91 (67%) with FL, 24 (18%) with MZL, 19 (14%) with MCL, and 1 (1%) with TL. At the time of enrollment, subjects had a median age of 66 years (range, 41-91); 81% had stage III/IV disease. Subjects had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-10), with 36% refractory to rituximab (defined as SD/PD to or PR/CR for <6 months with prior rituximab). The most common prior regimens were rituximab (41%), BR (25%), R-CHP (14%), R-CHOP (11%), and R-CVP (7%). At data cut-off, 45 (33%) subjects discontinued treatment before the maintenance period. Primary reasons for discontinuation of lenalidomide and/or rituximab, respectively, were due to AEs in 16 (12%) and 14 (10%) subjects, PD in 15 (11%) subjects for either treatment, withdrawal by subject in 6 (4%) and 7 (5%) respectively, and death 3 (2%) in either treatment. In the safety population (n=124), treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) during induction that led to dose reduction/interruption of lenalidomide or rituximab occurred in 55% or 24% of subjects, respectively, mainly due to neutropenia for lenalidomide and infusion-related symptoms for rituximab. The most common grade 3/4 AEs during induction were 27% neutropenia, 9% leukopenia, 6% thrombocytopenia, and 5% fatigue. 11 subjects have died (5 due to PD, 3 AEs, 3 other). At a median duration of 23.1 weeks (range, 0.1-51.1) of induction, 90 subjects were evaluable for response. Best responses to induction were 56 (62%) subjects with ORR, 8 (9%) CR, 12 (13%) CRu, 36 (40%) PR, and 22 (24%) SD. Responses with R2 treatment were observed in all histologies (Table 1). At data cut-off, 19 subjects have completed induction and 18 have proceeded to maintenance (n=7 R2, n=11 rituximab alone). Continued study and follow-up are ongoing to enroll more subjects in the induction and maintenance arms. Conclusions: R2 induction therapy shows favorable activity and a tolerable safety profile in subjects with advanced-stage, relapsed/refractory FL, MZL, MCL, and TL. Continued study is ongoing to determine the effect of R2 vs. rituximab maintenance following 1 year of R2 induction. Disclosures Andorsky: Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding. Yacoub:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria. Bitran:Oncology Specialists: Employment. Melear:Texas Oncology: Employment. Foon:Celgene: Employment. Rizvi:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Llorente:Celgene: Employment. Li:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharman:Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy.

Final Phase I Results of Perifosine In Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3064-3064
Author(s):  
Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽  
Paul G Richardson ◽  
Todd M Zimmerman ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Final Phase ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Ortho Biotech ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3064 Introduction: Perifosine (Peri) a novel, oral signal transduction modulator with multiple effects including inhibition of Akt and activation of JNK, has demonstrated clinical activity when combined with dexamethasone (Dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM (ASH 2007 #1164). Lenalidomide (Revlimid , Rev) a novel, oral immunomodulatory drug has activity against MM when combined with Dex. We previously reported encouraging safety data and observed clinical activity of the oral triplet combination (ASH 2008 # 3691). We now report the final phase I results of this study which aimed to determine the MTD and to evaluate activity of Peri + Rev + Dex, as an oral combination in pts with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Four cohorts ( 6 pts each) were planned, dosing Peri at 50 or 100mg (daily), Rev 15 or 25mg (d 1–21) and Dex 20mg (d 1–4, 9–12 and 17–20 for 4 cycles, then 20 mg d 1–4) in 28-d cycles. To limit dex-related toxicities, the protocol was amended to use weekly dex (40 mg), applying to cohorts 3, 4, and the MTD cohort. Toxicity was assessed using NCI CTCAE v3.0; DLT was defined as grade (G) 3 non-hematologic toxicity, G4 neutropenia for 5 d and/or neutropenic fever, or platelets <25,000/mm3 on >1 occasion despite transfusion. Response was assessed by modified EBMT criteria. Pts had to have received at least 1 prior therapy and no more than 4. Pts refractory to Rev/Dex were excluded. Results: 32 pts (17M/15F, median age 64 y, range 37 – 79) were enrolled; 6 pts in cohort 1 (Peri 50mg, Rev 15mg, Dex 20mg); 6 pts in cohort 2 (Peri 50mg, Rev 25mg, Dex 20mg); 8 pts in cohort 3 (Peri 100mg, Rev 15mg, Dex 40mg/wk); 6 pts in cohort 4 (Peri 100mg, Rev 25mg, Dex 40mg/wk) and 6 pts at MTD (Cohort 4). Median prior lines of treatment was 2 (range 1–4) with a median PS of 1. Relapsed (53%), Refractory to last therapy prior to study entry (47%). Prior therapy included dex (94%), thalidomide (75%), bortezomib (44%), and stem cell transplant (72%). Two pts (6%) were previously treated with Rev. 63% (15/24) of the prior thalidomide + dex (Thal/Dex) treated pts had progressed on a Thal/Dex regimen while 43% (6/14) of the prior bortezomib (Vel) treated pts had progressed on a prior Vel based regimen. Two pts did not complete one full cycle (non-compliance and adverse event not related to study drugs – both in cohort 3) and were not included in the efficacy analysis. 31/32 pts were evaluable for safety (non-compliant patient never took study drug and was excluded). The most common grade 1/2 events (any causality) included fatigue (48%), diarrhea (45%), upper respiratory infection (35%), nausea (32%) and hyperglycemia (32%). Grade 3/4 events > 10% included neutropenia (26%); hypophosphatemia (23%); thrombocytopenia (16%) and leucopenia (13%). There was one reported DLT in cohort 3 (Nausea). No grade 3/4 events of peripheral neuropathy or DVT were reported. Rev dose was reduced in 11 pts, Peri reduced in 9 pts and Dex reduced in 7 pts: 30 pts are evaluable for response, with best response as follows: Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all pts was 10.8 mos (CI: 4.6, 27.7) and 7 pts have not progressed. The median overall survival (OS) was 30.6 mos (CI: 16.7, NR) with 15/30 pts still alive. Of the 8 thalidomide naïve pts, 4 have progressed with a median projected PFS of 30 mos and all 8 pts remain alive (range 28 – 43 mos). Conclusions: Pts have tolerated Peri + Rev + Dex well with manageable toxicity, and with promising clinical activity demonstrated by an ORR (≥ PR) of 50%, an extended PFS and OS. Given that most pts were exposed to Thal/Dex with more than half refractory to a prior Thal/Dex regimen, the encouraging response rates and survival appear to suggest benefit with the addition of perifosine to Rev/Dex. This data thus warrants further study, including a potential randomized trial to confirm the activity of perifosine added to Rev/Dex. A randomized phase III trial of Peri/Vel/Dex vs. Vel/Dex is underway for previously Vel exposed MM patients. Disclosures: Jakubowiak: Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson Ortho-Centocor: Honoraria; Millennium, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium, Celgene, Centocor-Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Perifosine in combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zimmerman:Millennium, Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding. Kaufman:Celgene, Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene, Merck: Research Funding. Sportelli:Keryx Biopharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gardner:Keryx Biopharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

A Phase I/II Trial of the KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1959-1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Sheeba Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ksp Inhibitor

Abstract Abstract 1959 Background: Kinesin Spindle Protein (KSP) is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Inhibition of KSP induces mitotic arrest and cell death. ARRY-520 is a potent, selective KSP inhibitor. Cancers such as multiple myeloma (MM) which depend on the short-lived survival protein MCL-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520. ARRY-520 shows potent activity in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARRY-520 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 2 q 2 weeks without/with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM with 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent, unless ineligible for or refusing to receive this therapy) were eligible. Cohorts of at least 3 pts were enrolled in a classical 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Pts were treated for 2 cycles (4 weeks) to evaluate safety prior to dose escalation. Results: Twenty five pts have been treated to date, with a median age of 60 years (range 44–79) and a median of 5 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received prior bortezomib or carfilzomib, 21 pts received prior lenalidomide, 17 pts prior thalidomide, and 18 pts had a prior stem cell transplant. Pts received ARRY-520 without G-CSF at 1 mg/m2/day (n = 3), and at 1.25 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Grade 4 neutropenia was observed at 1.25 mg/m2/day, and this was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the DLT, dose escalation with prophylactic G-CSF support was initiated, at doses of 1.5 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable), 2.0 mg/m2/day (n = 6) and 2.25 mg/m2/day (n = 2) with G-CSF. Both the 2.0 mg/m2/day and 2.25 mg/m2/day dose levels were determined to be non-tolerated, with DLTs of febrile neutropenia (FN) (2 pts at 2.0 mg/m2/day and both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day) and Grade 3 mucositis (both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day). One out of 6 evaluable pts at 1.5 mg/m2/day also developed a DLT of FN. In an attempt to optimize the Phase 2 dose, an intermediate dose level of 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF is currently being evaluated. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) include those observed with other KSP inhibitors, such as hematological AEs (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia), fatigue, mucositis and other gastro-intestinal AEs. Pts displayed linear PK, a low clearance and a moderate volume of distribution, with moderate-to-high inter-individual variability in PK parameters. The median terminal elimination half life is 65 hours. The preliminary efficacy signal as a single agent is encouraging with 2 partial responses (PR) observed to date per IMWG and EBMT criteria in a heavily pretreated population (23 evaluable pts). A bortezomib-refractory pt with 8 prior lines of therapy, including a tandem transplant, treated at 1 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520 obtained a PR after Cycle 6, with urine protein and kappa light chain levels continuing to decline over time. He remains on-study after 15 months of ARRY-520 treatment. A pt with 2 prior lines of therapy, including prior carfilzomib, has obtained a PR after Cycle 8 at 2 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520, and she is currently ongoing after 4.5 months on therapy. Fifteen pts had a best response of stable disease (SD), including 1 pt with a thus far unconfirmed minimal response, and 6 had progressive disease. A total of 10 pts (43%) achieved a PR or SD lasting > 12 weeks. Several additional pts have shown other evidence of clinical activity, with decrease in paraproteins, increase in hemoglobin levels and regression of plasmacytomas. The median number of cycles is 4 (range 1–28+). Treatment activity has not correlated with any baseline characteristics or disease parameters to date. Conclusions: : The selective KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 has been well tolerated, and shows promising signs of single agent clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with RR MM. Prophylactic G-CSF has enabled higher doses to be tolerated. No cardiovascular or liver enzyme toxicity has been reported. Enrollment is ongoing at 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support, and a planned Phase 2 part of the study will be initiated as soon as the MTD is determined. Complete Phase 1 data will be disclosed at the time of the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Revlimid (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Zonder:Millennium: Consultancy, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event, Research Funding; Celgene:; Novartis:; Proteolix: . Weber:novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy. Walker:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Freeman:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rush:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ptaszynski:Array Biopharma: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Final Results of Open-Label Treatment with Eltrombopag During ENABLE 1: A Study of Eltrombopag As An Adjunct for Antiviral Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Associated with Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2232-2232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Dusheiko ◽  
Nezam H Afdhal ◽  
Edoardo Giannini ◽  
Pei-Jer Chen ◽  
Kwang-Hyub Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 2232 Introduction: Thrombocytopenia (TCP) is a common complication of cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections (Louie et al 2011); the presence of TCP impairs the ability to initiate peginterferon alpha (PEG) therapy and necessitates PEG dose reduction or discontinuation, thus reducing the potential for sustained virologic response (SVR). Eltrombopag, an oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia, increases platelet counts in patients with TCP due to HCV-related cirrhosis (McHutchison et al 2007). ENABLE 1 was a phase 3, multicenter, two-part study of eltrombopag for the treatment of HCV-associated TCP. Part 1 involved open-label, pre-antiviral treatment with eltrombopag. Patients achieving platelet counts ≥90,000/μL were randomized in Part 2 to receive eltrombopag or placebo in combination with antiviral therapy (PEG-2a plus ribavirin). Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag during the open-label, pre-antiviral treatment phase (Part 1) of ENABLE 1 in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Patients with chronic HCV and a baseline platelet count <75,000/μL were enrolled. In Part 1, all patients received open-label oral eltrombopag (25 mg daily with dose escalations every 2 weeks to a maximum dose of 100 mg) for up to 9 weeks or until platelet counts reached ≥90,000/μL. Patients who failed to achieve platelet counts ≥90,000/μL following 3 weeks of eltrombopag 100 mg daily did not enter Part 2 and attended scheduled follow-up visits. Patients achieving these counts were randomized 2:1 to eltrombopag or placebo (Part 2) at the final dose received in Part 1, in combination with antiviral therapy for up to 48 weeks. Results: A total of 716 patients were enrolled; 1 patient withdrew due to a protocol deviation, and 715 entered the open-label pre-antiviral phase. At study entry, most patients were male (62%) and Caucasian (72%); 17% were of Japanese/East Asian heritage. The median age was 52 years (range, 19–76). 488 patients (68%) had cirrhosis (FibroSURE™ score equivalent to METAVIR F4). The median duration of treatment during Part 1 was 20 days and the median of the mean daily dose was 25 mg (range, 0.8–75 mg). Median baseline platelets were 59,000/μL; these increased to 89,000/μL by week 2 and remained consistently elevated throughout open-label treatment (Figure). Following a median of 2 weeks of treatment (range, 0.1–9.6 weeks), 691 patients (97%) achieved platelet counts ≥90,000/μL. Treatment was discontinued during Part 1 for 33 patients (5%): platelets <90,000/μL (11); adverse events (AEs, 9); investigator discretion (7); patient decision (3); loss of follow-up (2); or a protocol deviation (1). During Part 2, 682 patients (95%) were randomized, 2 patients withdrew consent following randomization, and 680 patients (95%) initiated antiviral treatment. Of the patients who initiated treatment, 451 (66%) did so within 2 weeks and 627 (92%) did so within 4 weeks. The most common AEs observed during the open-label treatment phase were headache (7%), fatigue (4%), nausea (3%), and diarrhea (3%). Ninety-five patients (13%) experienced platelet counts >200,000/μL. No thromboembolic events were observed during open-label treatment. Conclusions: Eltrombopag was generally well-tolerated and resulted in sustained increase in platelet counts during the open-label, pre-antiviral treatment phase. Platelet count increases were seen as early as 2 weeks following initiation of treatment. The vast majority of patients (97%) achieved platelet count increases to ≥90,000/μL, the threshold for initiating PEG-2a plus ribavirin therapy, and most did so within 4 weeks of initiating eltrombopag treatment. Disclosures: Dusheiko: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Eltrombopag, inteferon and Ribavirin; eltrombopag is a thrombopoetin receptor agonist. Its efficacy and safety in raising platelet counts in hepatitis C positive patients (most with cirrhosis) and thrombocyotopaenia was studied in this protocol. Afdhal:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Vertex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Idenix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Springbank: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmasett: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbott: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Giannini:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Hoffman-LaRoche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Chen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Mostafa Kamel:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brainsky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Geib:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Vasey:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Patwardhan:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, company shares. Campbell:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Theodore:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

A Phase 2a, Open-Label, Dose-Finding Study To Determine The Safety and Tolerability Of Sotatercept (ACE-011) In Adults With Beta (β)-Thalassemia: Interim Results

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3448-3448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Domenica Cappellini ◽  
John Porter ◽  
Raffaella Origa ◽  
Gian Luca Forni ◽  
Adberrahmane Laadem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Total Bilirubin Level ◽  
Thalassemia Major ◽  
Hemoglobin Level ◽  
Thalassemia Intermedia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Beta (β)-thalassemia is characterized by ineffective erythropoiesis leading to anemia, bone marrow erythroid hyperplasia, iron overload, and organ failure. Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a novel and first-in-class activin type IIA receptor (ActRIIA) fusion protein that increases the release of mature erythrocytes into circulation by acting mainly on late-stage erythropoiesis (Carrancio S, et al. Blood. 2012;120:abstract 372). Clinical data in healthy volunteers have shown that treatment with sotatercept results in increased red blood cell (RBC) parameters, including hemoglobin level (Ruckle J, et al. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:744-52). RAP-011, a murine ortholog of sotatercept, was efficacious in a mouse model of β-thalassemia intermedia, reducing ineffective erythropoiesis as well as significantly improving anemia and decreasing bilirubin levels, supporting the clinical development of sotatercept (Dussiot M et al. Blood 2012;120:abstract 247). Methods This is an ongoing phase 2a, multicenter, open-label, dose-finding study to determine a safe and active dose level of sotatercept in adult patients with RBC-transfusion dependent (TD) β-thalassemia major or patients with β-thalassemia intermedia who are either TD or non-transfusion dependent (NTD). The dose levels of sotatercept studied to date are 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg/kg, given subcutaneously once every 3 weeks. Safety is assessed according to NCI-CTC grading. Efficacy is assessed by hemoglobin increase from baseline and/or reduction in transfusion burden. Secondary endpoints include assessment of biomarkers for erythropoiesis, hemolysis, iron metabolism, and bone metabolism, as well as in vitro dyserythropoiesis. Dose escalation to higher dose levels is planned contingent on data review and favorable safety profile as determined by the Steering Committee. Results Patient demographics. A total of 25 patients have been enrolled as of July 26, 2013; 8 in the 0.1 mg/kg cohort, 9 in the 0.3 mg/kg cohort, and 8 in the 0.5 mg/kg cohort. Treatment and analysis for the 0.5 mg/kg cohort is underway and will be updated and presented. In the 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg cohorts, 3 (18%) patients had β-thalassemia major and 14 (82%) had β-thalassemia intermedia (12 of whom were NTD and 2 of whom were TD). Of the 12 NTD β-thalassemia intermedia patients, 6 were treated at the 0.1 mg/kg dose level and 6 at the 0.3 mg/kg dose level. Median baseline hemoglobin for these NTD patients was 8.6 g/dL (range 5.8 to 10.7 g/dL). Median number of sotatercept doses administered was 4 (range 2 to 7) in the 0.1 mg/kg cohort and 8 (range 3 to 9) in the 0.3 mg/kg cohort; 13/17 (76%) patients remained on treatment. Safety.Sotatercept was generally well tolerated. There were no dose-limiting toxicities reported. Two serious adverse events were reported in the 0.1 mg/kg cohort: a grade 2 phlebitis in an NTD patient with a history of high D-dimer at baseline, and a worsening grade 3 bone pain in a TD β-thalassemia major patient with a history of osteoporosis; both were considered possibly study drug-related. Hemoglobin levels/transfusion requirements. Among NTD patients, preliminary data showed that 1 (17%) patient in the 0.1 mg/kg cohort and all 6 (100%) patients in the 0.3 mg/kg cohort had at least a 1 g/dL increase in hemoglobin level from baseline; among these, 1 patient treated with sotatercept 0.3 mg/kg showed a 2 g/dL hemoglobin level increase from baseline as well as a decrease in total bilirubin level from 2.7 × upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline to 1.8 × ULN. No other relevant decrease in total bilirubin level was reported at the lower dose levels (0.1 mg/kg or 0.3 mg/kg). Three TD patients were still receiving treatment (2 β-thalassemia intermedia and 1 β-thalassemia major). There had been no appreciable reduction in transfusion burden in the 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg cohorts to date; however further follow up is warranted and an update will be presented. Conclusion Based on these preliminary data, sotatercept administered subcutaneously every 3 weeks may improve anemia via a novel mechanism of action with a favorable safety profile, thereby addressing a significant unmet medical need for patients with NTD β-thalassemia intermedia. The current data suggest a dose-dependent response that supports further evaluation of the exposure–effect relationship of sotatercept in patients with NTD β-thalassemia intermedia. The first, second, and last authors contributed equally to this abstract. Disclosures: Cappellini: Genzyme: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Sotatercept is an investigational agent that is being assessed for efficacy and safety in beta-thalassemia. Porter:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Forni:Celgene: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Novartis Pharma: Research Funding. Laadem:Celgene Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Galacteros:Celgene: Consultancy. Miteva:Celgene Corp.: Employment. Sung:Celgene Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chopra:Celgene Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Klesczewski:Celgene Corp.: Employment. Attie:Acceleron Pharma: Employment. Hermine:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Ublituximab + TGR-1202 Demonstrates Activity and a Favorable Safety Profile in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell NHL and High-Risk CLL: Phase I Results

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1538-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Lunning ◽  
Julie Vose ◽  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Loretta Nastoupil ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Favorable Safety ◽  
Higher Doses

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel anti-CD20 mAb that has been glycoengineered for enhanced ADCC. TGR-1202 is a novel once daily oral PI3Kδ inhibitor with clinical activity in B-cell lymphoma and a notably differentiated tolerability profile compared to similar agents. The combination of UTX + TGR-1202 showed strong synergistic activity in-vitro (Lugano 2013). Herein we report the results from the Phase 1 (dose-escalation) and updated results from the Phase Ib (dose-expansion) evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of UTX + TGR-1202 in patients (pts) with heavily pre-treated rel/ref NHL and CLL. Methods: A 3+3 design was utilized with rel/ref NHL and CLL pts accruing independently and no limit on the number or type of prior therapies. Patients refractory to prior PI3K or BTK inhibitors were eligible. UTX was administered D1, 8, 15 of Cyc 1 & 2, followed by D1 of Cyc 4, 6, 9 & 12. TGR-1202 was administered orally once-daily starting on D1 of Cyc 1. Primary endpoints: Safety and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints: Efficacy (ORR, CR rate). Results: 56 patients have been enrolled to date and are evaluable for safety: 16 CLL/SLL, 16 FL, 16 DLBCL, 5 MZL, 2 MCL and 1 Richter's transformation. Med age 64 yo (range 29-86); 37 M/19 F; median # prior treatment regimens = 3 (range 1-9). Day 1 infusion reactions (2% G 3/4), neutropenia (23% G 3/4), diarrhea (2% G 3/4), and nausea (0% G 3/4) were the most commonly reported adverse events considered at least possibly related to either study drug. One patient (CLL cohort 1) with baseline Gr 3 neutropenia at study entry worsened to Gr 4 resulting in a dose delay which necessitated enrollment of an additional 3 pts at that dose level. Dose escalation continued into all planned subsequent NHL and CLL cohorts (up to 1200 mg). No MTD was observed in the Phase I portion and subtype specific expansion cohorts (Phase Ib) with 800 and 1200 mg dose of micronized TGR-1202 followed. Activity was observed at all dose levels; however a possible dose-response relationship was observed with TGR-1202 at higher doses compared to the lower doses. Of the 37 evaluable pts treated at the higher doses of TGR-1202 (1200 mg original formulation or > 600 mg micronized), overall response was as follows: CLL/SLL (5/7); FL/MZL (10/15); DLBCL (5/12); MCL (0/2) and Richter's (1/1). No CLL pts progressed at the first efficacy assessment, despite 4/5 having high-risk cytogenetics. Two CLL pts with SD include a 17p del, ibrutinib refractory patient who eventually progressed on treatment and the other remains on study awaiting future assessments. Of interest, 7 of the DLBCL pts were GCB subtype of which 71% were rituximab refractory, with 3/7 achieving an objective response, 2 remaining in stable disease (4+ and 5+ mos each), and 2 having progressed to date (avg time on study 7 mos, range 2 - 16+ mos). Conclusions: The combination of UTX + TGR-1202 is active and well tolerated in pts with both indolent and aggressive rel/ref NHL and CLL. The Phase I portion is complete and enrollment remains open in expansion cohorts for CLL, FL/MZL and DLBCL pts evaluating TGR-1202 micronized doses at 800 to 1200 mg in combination with UTX. Given the favorable safety profile and clinical activity observed, Phase 3 programs are planned with UTX + TGR-1202. Disclosures Lunning: BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. Vose:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nastoupil:Genentech: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Burger:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Siddiqi:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics/Jannsen: Speakers Bureau; Kite pharma: Other: attended advisory board meeting. Flowers:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Celegene: Other: Unpaid consultant, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Spectrum: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celegene: Other: Unpaid consultant, Research Funding. Cutter:Clearview Cancer Center: Employment. Pauli:Clearview Cancer Institute: Employment; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Phase 1/1b Study of the Stapled Peptide ALRN-6924, a Dual Inhibitor of MDMX and MDM2, As Monotherapy or in Combination with Cytarabine for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory AML and Advanced MDS with TP53 Wild-Type

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4066-4066 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Sallman ◽  
Uma Borate ◽  
Elizabeth H. Cull ◽  
William B. Donnellan ◽  
Rami S. Komrokji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Dual Inhibitor ◽  
Stapled Peptide ◽  
Double Minute ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Murine Double Minute ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: ALRN-6924, the first-ever clinical stage stapled peptide, has been structurally stabilized ("stapled") in an α-helical configuration, to mimic the inhibitor-binding region of the intracellular tumor suppressor protein, p53. By mimicking this region, ALRN-6924 binds the two most important endogenous inhibitors of p53, murine double minute-X (MDMX) and murine double minute-2 (MDM2), thereby restoring p53's ability to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in TP53 wild-type (WT) cancer cells. ALRN-6924 is the first known synthetic agent to simultaneously target both of these important p53 inhibitors. In preclinical studies, ALRN-6924 inhibited the proliferation of AML cell lines and primary human AML cells alone and in combination with cytarabine. Preclinical data (Carvajal et al, 2018) demonstrated antiproliferative effects against leukemic stem cells, and complete responses that translated into cures in approximately 40% of mice in xenotransplantation studies. These data also suggested that more frequent dosing may enhance efficacy, and this hypothesis is now being evaluated in the ongoing clinical trial. Methods: ALRN-6924 is being evaluated alone and in combination with cytarabine, using a 3+3 dose escalation design. Using the previously determined RP2D for solid tumors (Meric-Bernstam et al., 2017), the initial cohorts receive 3.1 mg/kg of ALRN-6924 IV over 1 hour on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (QW mono-therapy). In separate cohorts, ALRN-6924 is combined with cytarabine IV over 1 hour (initially 100 mg/m2, later 200 mg/m2 ; QW combo-therapy). Later monotherapy cohorts receive more frequent ALRN-6924 administration on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 of a 21-day cycle (TIW mono-therapy), with an initial dose level of 2.7 mg/kg. Adverse events (AEs) are assessed per CTCAE V4.03; responses are evaluated by the investigators according to IWG (Cheson 2006) and AML Response Criteria (Dohner 2010), for MDS and AML, respectively. Results: Preliminary results are being presented for 13 pts on QW mono- and 19 pts on QW combo-therapy. As of 13 July 2018, 32 QW pts have enrolled, with a median age of 75 years (38-90), 18 pts with de novo or secondary AML and 14 pts with MDS who failed hypomethylating agents. Thus far, pts have received 1-14 cycles. No DLTs have been observed and no MTD has been reached for QW mono-therapy (3.1-5.8 mg/kg) or QW combo-therapy (3.1-4.4 mg/kg ALRN-6924 and 100-200 mg/m2 cytarabine). For QW-treated pts (mono and combo), AEs related to treatment with ALRN-6924 have been reported in 62.5% of pts; most frequent are nausea (25.0%), thrombocytopenia (25.0%), vomiting (25.0%), fatigue (15.6%), and diarrhea (15.6%). Hyperbilirubinemia was reported in 18.8% of pts, representing a known transient effect of ALRN-6924 clearance that has not been associated with liver injury. Thrombocytopenia is the only ≥ grade 3 hematologic AE related to treatment with ALRN-6924 that was reported in ≥5% of pts, with all cases being grade 4 thrombocytopenia (7 pts, 21.9%). SAEs related to treatment with ALRN-6924 have been reported in 2 pts (grade 3 extremity pain and grade 4 angioedema while on concomitant lisinopril). The AE profiles for pts receiving ALRN-6924 QW mono- or QW combo-therapy were not significantly different. Including all QW cohorts (mono and combo), twenty-seven pts are efficacy-evaluable as of July 13, 2018. In preliminary efficacy results across all cohorts, marrow CR was reported in two out of four MDS pts treated with 4.4 mg/kg ALRN-6924 + 200 mg/m2 cytarabine, one of whom went on to transplant. An additional three MDS pts achieved SD. Among AML pts, 1 had a >50% reduction in bone marrow blasts while receiving 3.1 and then 4.4 mg/kg ALRN-6924 plus 100 mg/m2 cytarabine QW. This was durable until the pt succumbed to pneumonia that was unrelated to study drug in cycle 7. For QW-treated pts (mono and combo), main reasons for treatment discontinuation include treatment failure (31.2%), consent withdrawn (25.0%), death (9.4%), MDS transformed to AML (6.2%), and adverse event (6.2%). Accrual to QW combo-therapy with cytarabine in MDS and TIW mono-therapy in AML and MDS continues; updated data for QW mono-, QW-combo as well as TIW mono-therapy will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: ALRN-6924 has shown clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in AML and MDS. Continued development of ALRN-6924 for AML and MDS treatment is warranted. Disclosures Sallman: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Borate:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cull:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Komrokji:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Steidl:Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding. Corvez:Aileron Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Payton:Aileron Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Annis:Aileron Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Pinchasik:Aileron Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Aivado:Aileron Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Fostamatinib, a Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, for the Treatment of Warm Antibody Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: Initial Results of the Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Period of the Soar Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3612-3612 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Kuter ◽  
Richy Agajanian ◽  
Donald M. Arnold ◽  
Michael Boxer ◽  
Catherine Broome ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Period ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Antiglobulin Test ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Extension Period

Abstract Background: Warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) is a rare and often serious disease characterized by antibody-mediated destruction of red blood cells (RBCs). Activation of Fc receptors on macrophages in turn activates spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), which triggers a signaling cascade leading to phagocytosis of the antibody-bearing cells. Fostamatinib, a SYK inhibitor, markedly improved Hgb levels in 9 of 17 (53%) patients with wAIHA during a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study. This abstract reports the results of ongoing fostamatinib treatment as of 2 July 2018 in patients who completed the 24-week treatment period and rolled over into the extension period of the study. Methods: Eligible adult patients had primary or secondary wAIHA and had failed more than one prior treatment for wAIHA. Patients had to have hemoglobin (Hgb) <10 g/dL, an IgG-positive direct antiglobulin test, haptoglobin <10 mg/dL, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >ULN. In order to enter the extension period of the study, patients had to have [1] met the primary efficacy endpoint (Hgb >10 g/dL with an increase of ≥2 g/dL from baseline by Week 24 without rescue therapy or RBC transfusion) OR have shown a beneficial trend during the 24-week treatment period and [2] tolerated study drug. Fostamatinib 150mg BID (or the dose taken at the end of the 24-week treatment period, if a dose reduction had occurred) was taken orally with no food restriction, and patients were seen every 6 weeks during the extension period. Results: Six patients have entered the extension period including 5 who had met the primary efficacy endpoint and 1 who showed a beneficial trend at Week 24 (and had a response at Week 30). One patient had lymphoproliferative disease. Prior AIHA treatment included splenectomy (1), steroids (6), and rituximab (2). The median duration of disease was 1.9 years (range 0.4-15.7). The mean age was 58.7 years (range 30-86), 5 were female, all were white, and 4 were Hispanic or Latino. At baseline the median Hgb was 9.1 g/dL (range: 8.6-9.5); the median lactate dehydrogenase was 273 U/L (range 233-781); the median reticulocyte count was 252.2 x109/L (range 7.8-350.0); and the median haptoglobin was 7.0 mg/dL (range 7.0-9.0). The direct antiglobulin test was positive for IgG in 5 patients at screening. Median Hgb levels increased over the course of the study. See figure. Four of 6 patients had an ongoing response as of the data cutoff date, and none has had rescue therapy or an RBC transfusion. All 6 patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE) during the study, including noninfectious diarrhea in 1 (treatment-related), hepatic disorders in 3 (treatment-related in 2; treatment interrupted in 1), and hypertension in 1 (not related). One patient had a serious AE (inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion), which was not related to fostamatinib. To date, no new safety signals have been detected. Summary/Conclusion: Patients with wAIHA continued to display markedly improved Hgb levels during the extension period of the study. Side effects were manageable and consistent with those previously reported with fostamatinib in other conditions. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Kuter: ONO: Consultancy; Protalex: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Principia: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; Argenx: Consultancy; Syntimmune: Consultancy; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arnold:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; UCB: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Boxer:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Rigel: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau. Broome:Bioverativ: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria. Field:Prolong: Research Funding; Ironwood: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Lowe:Rigel: Consultancy. Tong:Rigel: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zayed:Rigel: Employment, Equity Ownership. Duliege:Rigel: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Safety and Preliminary Clinical Activity of REGN5458, an Anti-Bcma x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3176-3176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Cooper ◽  
Deepu Madduri ◽  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Jingjin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Initial Dose ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bispecific Antibody ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Evaluation Period ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most common hematologic malignancy, is characterized by the expansion of malignant plasma cells which express, the cell surface protein, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Patients (pts) with advanced MM who are refractory to an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) have an expected overall survival of <1 year (Gandhi et al. 2019). Given the therapeutic potential of utilizing BCMA to redirect T-cell effector function on multiple myeloma cells, we generated REGN5458, an anti-BCMA x anti-CD3 bispecific antibody that binds to both BCMA on plasma cells and to CD3 on T-cells. Here we describe the safety and clinical activity in relapsed/refractory MM patients treated on the initial dose level of REGN5458 in trial (NCT03761108). Methods The primary objectives of the Phase 1 portion of the study are to determine the safety, tolerability and occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of REGN5458. The primary objective of the Phase 2 portion is to assess the preliminary anti-tumor activity of REGN5458. Key secondary objectives include assessment of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics. Eligible pts with MM must have >3 prior lines of therapy including a PI, IMiD and anti-CD38 antibody or progression on or after an anti-CD38 antibody and refractory to a PI and IMiD. Treatment consists of 16 weekly doses of REGN5458, followed by a maintenance phase of 12 doses administered every 2 weeks. Pts with progressive disease after initial response are eligible for retreatment. Response was assessed per the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results As of July 12, 2019, three pts have been treated at the initial dose level of 3 mg REGN5458. All pts had an ECOG score of 1. Pt 1, an 81-year-old male who had medullary plasmacytomas and cutaneous extramedullary plasmacytomas (EMPs), had received four prior lines of therapy. He experienced Grade (Gr) 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that was treated with tocilizumab and corticosteroids because of persistent debilitating fever. This patient also experienced Gr 3 TEAEs including anemia, pain in both extremities (location of multiple sites of disease), and worsening hypertension within the DLT evaluation period. Subsequent to the DLT evaluation period, he had Gr 3 fatigue, Gr 3 febrile neutropenia, Gr 3 lung infection, Gr 3 atrial fibrillation, and Gr 4 septic shock. Pt 1 reached a partial response at Week 8 and a very good partial response (VGPR) as of Week 16 despite interruption of study drug at Week 14 due to TEAEs. This pt has IgG lambda myeloma and showed rapid decreases in both lambda free light chain and M-protein (Figure 1A) and resolution of medullary and cutaneous plasmacytomas following the Week 12 dose (Figure 1B and 1C). Pt 1 had transient cytokine elevations of interferon gamma, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-10 following dosing through Week 5, consistent with mild CRS. Peripheral blood immune monitoring revealed increases in CD8 effector memory T-cells through Week 11, relative to other subsets which remained unchanged during the treatment period. Pt 1 remains in the treatment phase of the study. Pt 2 is a 76-year-old female who had received four prior lines of therapy and had extensive intra-abdominal EMPs. She had no ≥ Gr 2 TEAEs. Pt 2 had disease progression at first assessment and is in the follow-up phase of the study. Pt 3 is a 78-year-old female with seven prior lines of therapy. She experienced Gr 2 decreases in both platelets and neutrophils within the DLT evaluation period. Pt 3 had stable disease (SD) at first assessment and remains in the treatment phase of the study. No DLTs were reported. No pt experienced infusion-related reactions. No pt had Gr 5 TEAEs or discontinued treatment due to AEs. Additional PK and biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions/Summary In this FIH study of REGN5458, no DLTs were recorded in the first three pts treated with the initial dose. One pt responded with a VGPR and another had SD. The study is ongoing and recruiting pts at higher doses. Gandhi UH et al. Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy. Leukemia; 2019; DOI:10.1038/s41375-019-0435-7 Disclosures Madduri: Celgene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Lentzsch:Bayer: Consultancy; Columbia University: Patents & Royalties: 11-1F4mAb as Anti-Amyloid Strategy; Janssen: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Crossfires in hematologic Malignancies: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Honoraria; Multiple Myelopma Research Foundation: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Proclara: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy. Jagannath:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Merck & Co.: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy. Li:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boyapati:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adriaens:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chokshi:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lowy:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weinreich:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yancopoulos:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharma:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Karasarides:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternberg:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: The data described in the abstract will report on use of REGN5458 in a first-in-human trial in patients with multiple myeloma.

scholarly journals Interim Results from Fight-203, a Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib (INCB054828) in Patients with Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Rearrangement of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 690-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Jason R. Gotlib ◽  
Adam J. Mead ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Lymphoid Neoplasms ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms (MLNs) with rearrangement of FGFR1 on chromosome band 8p11 are rare but aggressive neoplasms characterized by heterogeneous presentation with myeloid and/or lymphoid proliferation, extramedullary involvement, and rapid progression to blast phase (Strati P, et al., Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:1672-1676). FGFR1 gets constitutively activated through fusion genes involving various partner genes, most frequently ZMYM2-FGFR1 or BCR-FGFR1 as consequence of a t(8;13)(p11;q12) or a t(8;22)(p11;q11), respectively. Chemotherapy is usually ineffective, effective targeted treatment has not been described, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) is the only potentially curative option. Pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3, has shown efficacy in patients with FGF/FGFR-activated tumors, including cholangiocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. We report interim results from the ongoing fight-203 study (NCT03011372) of pemigatinib in patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLNs. Methods: Fight-203 is a phase 2, open-label study enrolling patients ≥ 18 years of age with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. Patients enrolled in the study must have progressed on ≥ 1 prior treatment and be ineligible for alloHSCT. Patients receive a daily oral dose of pemigatinib 13.5 mg on a 21-day cycle (2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall clinical benefit rate, which includes complete clinical (CR) or partial clinical response (PR), and either complete or partial cytogenetic response (CCyR, PCyR). Secondary endpoints include duration of response/benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety/tolerability. Efficacy is assessed by evaluation of bone marrow histomorphology changes, standard cytogenetic and FISH evaluation of the FGFR1 rearrangement, and PET/CT scan. Results: At data cutoff (July 23, 2018), 14 patients were enrolled. Ten patients who had ≥ 1 response assessment were included in the analysis (Table). Patients received an average of 6.9 cycles of pemigatinib (range, 2-12 cycles). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 0-5), including 2 patients who received alloHSCT. Eight patients (80%) had a major CyR, including 6 patients with CCyR and 2 with PCyR. Eight patients (80%) had a CR or PR in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and extramedullary disease. One patient died of progression to myeloid blast crisis, 2 patients were bridged to alloHSCT, and 7 patients are ongoing. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were hyperphosphatemia (n=7 [70%]), diarrhea (n=5 [50%]) and anemia (n=5 [50%]); hyperphosphatemia was managed with diet and phosphate binders. Nine events in 4 patients (40%) were grade 3/4; 2 of these events (diarrhea and leukopenia) in 2 patients were related to pemigatinib. There were no drug-related AEs leading to dose interruption, dose reduction, or discontinuation. Conclusions: Pemigatinib showed promising efficacy, with an 80% major CyR rate accompanied by complete or partial remission, and was generally well tolerated by patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. The protocol was amended to allow continuous dosing, and the study is currently enrolling. Disclosures Verstovsek: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gotlib:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Kartos: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mead:Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Evotek: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elstar: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hernandez Boluda:Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Asatiani:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lihou:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiter:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals First in Human Study with GSK2857916, an Antibody Drug Conjugated to Microtubule-Disrupting Agent Directed Against B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results from Study BMA117159 Part 1 Dose Escalation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1148-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. Cohen ◽  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Paul G Richardson ◽  
Ed N. Libby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Surface Receptor ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ocular Toxicity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Expression of BCMA, a cell surface receptor in the TNF superfamily, is restricted to B cells at later stages of differentiation and is requisite for the survival of long lived plasma cells. BCMA is expressed on MM cells at variable levels. GSK2857916 is a humanized IgG1 anti-BCMA antibody conjugated to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin-F via a stable, protease-resistant maleimidocaproyl linker. Upon binding to BCMA, GSK2857916 is rapidly internalized and active drug is released within the cell. GSK2857916 also exhibits enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity resulting from afucosylation of the FC domain which increases affinity to FCγRIIIa expressed on immune effector cells. The rationale for investigating GSK2857916 in MM is supported by the restricted pattern of BCMA expression and by evidence from preclinical studies. Methods BMA117159 (NCT02064387) is a Phase I open-label study investigating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), antidrug antibodies (ADA) and clinical activity of GSK2857916 in relapsed/refractory MM and other hematologic malignancies expressing BCMA. Dose escalation (Part 1) is conducted exclusively in MM patients; primary objective is safety, determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose. GSK2857916 is administered every 3 weeks as a1 hr intravenous infusion with no mandatory prophylaxis for infusion related reactions (IRR). Bayesian Logistic Regression Model is applied for dose recommendations. Eligible MM patients must have prior treatments with alkylators, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators and stem cell transplantation, if transplant eligible, and have documented disease progression on or within 60 days of last therapy. Additional key inclusion criteria include: ANC >1x109/L; hemoglobin >8 g/dL; PLT >50x109/L; INR <1.5; PTT <1.5xULN; total bilirubin ≤1.25xULN; AST and ALT <1.5xULN; serum creatinine <1.2xULN or calculated creatinine clearance >60 mL/min; albuminuria <500mg/24hr; LVEF >50% and troponin <1xULN. Patients remain on treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or completing 16 treatment cycles. Blood is collected for PK and ADA analyses; blood and bone marrow aspirates are collected for PD analyses. Results To date 24 MM patients have enrolled and completed the 21 day DLT observation period. Patients were enrolled at the following 8 dose levels: 0.03 (n=1); 0.06 (n=1); 0.12 (n=4); 0.24 (n=4); 0.48 (n=4); 0.96 (n=3); 1.92 (n=4), and 3.4 mg/kg (n=3). The median age is 60 years (range 39-71); 50% are male. Eighty-three percent received ≥4 prior lines. Sixty-three percent had IgG and 29% had IgA types. Seven patients (29%) had adverse cytogenetics defined as del17p13, or t(4;14) . Overall, 23 patients (96%) experienced adverse events (AE); the most frequent (≥20%) regardless of cause were nausea (42%), fatigue (38%), anemia (29%), chills (29%), pyrexia (29%), thrombocytopenia (29%), dry eye (21%), and hypercalcemia (21%). Grade 3/4 AEs reported in ≥10% of patients were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. Eight serious AEs were reported in 6 patients with 1 event of limbal stem cell dysfunction considered drug related; this event has not resolved. There were no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Four patients required dose reduction due to AEs: ocular toxicity (n=1), corneal disorder/ocular toxicity (n=1), dry eyes (n=1), and keratitis (n=1). IRRs (all Grade 1 or 2) were reported in 7 patients (29%) across dose levels and occurred with the first dose administration. The most frequent symptoms were chills. No DLTs were reported. Sixteen patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression (n=14), patient decision (n=1), completing 16 cycles of scheduled treatment (n=1); 8 patients are ongoing. There was1 MR at 0.24 mg/kg, and 1 VGPR, 3 PR, and1 MR at doses ≥0.96 mg/kg; resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 25% (unconfirmed responses). Conclusion GSK2857916 was well tolerated with no DLTs up to 3.4mg/kg q3w; MTD was not reached. AEs were manageable with ocular toxicity emerging as the most frequent reason for dose modifications. Clinical activity has been seen at higher doses. Complete safety, ADA, PD, and clinical activity data from all dose levels evaluated in Part 1 for q3w schedule will be presented. Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline; drug linker technology is licensed from Seattle Genetics Disclosures Cohen: Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Trudel:Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Oncoethix: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN/Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Speakers Bureau. DeWall:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ellis:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mazumdar:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Opalinska:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Voorhees:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene, BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document