A Naive NK Cell Repertoire in the Circulation of Haploidentical Stem Cell Donors Pre Mobilization Predicts Rejection of Cord Myeloid Cells in Patients Undergoing Combined Haploidentical and Unrelated Cord Blood HSCT

Abstract Background: For patients (pts) with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) lacking an HLA identical donor, outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using unrelated cord blood (UCB) units or haplo-identical donors (HDs) have historically been associated with high graft failure rates and poor survival. In an ongoing clinical trial at the NHLBI, we have observed excellent engraftment (100%) and survival (91%) in SAA pts (n=27) receiving a transplant that co-infuses a single UCB unit with CD34-selectedCD3-depletedcells from a haplo-identical relative. Although cord myeloid engraftment(defined as cord ANC >500/μL) occurred at<day 100 in the majority of pts, a significant fraction of pts had delayed (>day 100) or no cord myeloid engraftment. In this analysis, we investigated factors that may have impeded cord myeloid engraftment following UCB/HD transplantation. Methods: Flow-based NK cell phenotyping using a BD Fortessa II instrument was performed on blood obtained pre-transplant from HDs used for the first 18 SAA pts undergoing UCB/HD transplantation. Lineage specific chimerism was measured by PCR of microsatellites (PowerPlex 16 HS Systemkit/Promega) using DNA from flow sorted cells (BD FACSAria) collected multiple time points post-transplant.KIR-ligand incompatibility in the HD vs UCB directionwas defined using high-resolution HLA typing. Results: 13/18 (72%) pts had cord myeloid engraftment before day 100 while 5/18 (28%) had delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment. Remarkably, delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment occurred exclusively in pts transplanted with KIR-ligand incompatibility in the HD vs UCB direction (n=9) (Figure 1A). In contrast, all 9 pts transplanted with KIR-ligand compatibility in the HD vs UCB direction achieved cord myeloid engraftment by ²day 48 (median day 35) post-transplant. Chimerism analysis performed on blood obtained 30+ days post-transplant revealed NK cell chimerism was ³ 90% cord in origin in all 9 pts transplanted with KIR-ligand compatible grafts. In contrast, amongst the 9 pts receiving a KIR-ligand incompatible transplant, NK cell chimerism was predominantly HD in origin with only a minor fraction of cord NK cells detected 30-200 days post-transplant (Figure 1B). Predominant HD NK cell chimerism in pts receiving a KIR-ligand incompatible transplant was associated with lower degrees of cord myeloid chimerism compared to KIR-ligand compatible recipients. Further analysis of the KIR-ligand incompatible cohort revealed distinct heterogeneity in the time to cord myeloid engraftment (Figure 1A). Although delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment was observed in 5/9 recipients of KIR-ligand incompatible transplants, 4/9 pts in this cohort had cord engraftment at a similar time as pts transplanted with KIR-ligand compatible grafts (median 35 vs. 35 days). This variability in time to cord myeloid engraftment was not associated with stem cell dose, degree of HD NK cell chimerism, type of KIR-ligand incompatibility or KIR haplotype. However, we observed a strong correlation between the proportion of naive NK cells in circulation of HDs before stem cell mobilization with delayed or no myeloid cord engraftment (Figure 1C). With the exception of one patient who had failed HD engraftment, only transplants of CD34+ cells from HDs with a predominantly naive NK cell repertoire, expressing high frequencies of the NKG2A receptor concomitant with low frequencies of NKG2C, Lir-1 and CD57 resulted in delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment (p<0.05). Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that NK cells from engrafting CD34+ cells from selected HDs can significantly delay or completely inhibit cord myeloid engraftment following UCB/HD transplantation. Suppression of cord hematopoiesis appears to be restricted to NK cells originating from HDs withHD vs UCB KIR-ligand incompatibility who have a large naive NK cell repertoire in their circulation prior to stem cell mobilization. The myelosuppressive effects of these NK cells are consistent with recentlypublished data showing a naive NK cell repertoire in stem cell donors predicts a reduced risk of AML relapse post-allogeneic HSCT.Further studies defining the mechanisms through which naive NK cells suppress cord hematopoiesis followingUCB/HDtransplantation could shed insights into methods to optimize NK cell mediated graft-vs-leukemia followingallogeneicHSCT of myeloid leukemias. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Daily Measurements of Blood CD34+ Cells After Stem Cell Mobilization Predict Stem Cell Yield and Posttransplant Hematopoietic Recovery

Journal of Hematotherapy ◽

10.1089/scd.1.1997.6.13 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 13-19 ◽

Cited By ~ 33

Author(s):

KARI REMES ◽

IRMA MATINLAURI ◽

SEIJA GRENMAN ◽

MAIJA ITÄLÄ ◽

MARJUT KAUPPILA ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Yield ◽

Hematopoietic Recovery ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Download Full-text

Up-Regulation of NK Cell Activating Receptors Associated with Elevated IL-15 Levels Post-Transplant.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.1417.1417 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 1417-1417

Author(s):

Michael Boyiadzis ◽

Jesse Carson ◽

Kenton Allen ◽

Sarfraz A. Memon ◽

Robert A. Dean ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Nk Cells ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Receptor Expression ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Lectin Receptors ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Activating Receptors ◽

Cytokine Milieu

Abstract NK cells express diverse activating and inhibitory receptors, which collectively determine the NK cytotoxic response. Because NK cells can be potent anti-tumor effectors in the post transplant period of minimal residual disease, we investigated the receptor expression on NK cells following non-myeloablative, HLA-matched, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). We focused on activating receptors, comparing the expression of natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCR) and C-type lectin receptors on circulating NK cells at one, three, six and twelve months following HSCT with that of the donor-derived mobilized stem cell apheresis. During the first post-transplant month, the absolute numbers of NK cells recovered to normal levels in the 14 patients studied, but the subpopulation of CD56++(bright) CD16− NK cells increased disproportionately compared to the more common CD56+(dull) CD16+ NK cells. By six months the proportions of the NK cell subsets normalized to pre-transplant levels. At one month post transplant, the median percentage of NK cells expressing the anti-tumor NCR NKp46 increased from 15 to 64% and that expressing NKp30 increased from 23 to 40% as compared to the donor’s NK cells; expression remained elevated during the first year. Expression of NKG2D, the homodimeric activating C-type lectin receptor, similarly increased post-transplant. CD94 was also upregulated on NK cells, but the activating heterodimeric partner of CD94, NKG2C, did not change significantly. To investigate these shifts in NK populations and receptor expression, we investigated the effect of cytokine milieu post transplant on these shifts in NK populations and receptor expression. We have determined that plasma levels of IL-15, a cytokine critical in NK differentiation and expansion, increase more than 50-fold in these HSCT patients from pretreatment to the day of transplant and decline in the first weeks post transplant, inversely proportional to NK recovery. When NK cells were cultured with rIL-15, we observed a disproportionate expansion of CD56++ NK cells and a rapid up-regulation of the NCR and NKG2D receptors, similar to the changes observed post-transplant. These data suggest that the cytokine milieu of transplant, in particular elevated levels of IL-15, may contribute to anti-tumor efficacy post transplant by affecting the recovery of NK subsets and modulating expression of activating receptors.

Download Full-text

Clinical Impact and Resource Utilization After Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2142.2142 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2142-2142

Author(s):

Morie A Gertz ◽

Robert Wolf ◽

Ivana N. Micallef ◽

Dennis A. Gastineau

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Growth Factors ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Resource Utilization ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Hodgkin Disease ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 2142 Poster Board II-119 High-dose chemotherapy in conjunction with autologous SCT is the preferred treatment of relapsed Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Failure to achieve optimal stem cell mobilization results in multiple subsequent attempts, which consumes large amounts of growth factors and potentially requires antibiotics and transfusions. We retrospectively reviewed the natural history of stem cell mobilization attempts at our institution from 2001 through 2007 to determine the frequency of suboptimal mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing autologous transplant and analyzed the subsequent resource utilization in patients with initially failed attempts. Of 1,775 patients undergoing mobilization during the study period, stem cell collection (defined by the number of CD34+ cells/kg) was “ optimal” (≥5×106) in 53%, “low” (≥2 to 5×106) in 25%,“ poor” (<2×106) in 10%, and “failed” (<10 CD34+ cells/mL) in 12%. In the 47% of collections that were less than optimal, increased resource consumption included increased use of growth factors and antibiotics, subsequent chemotherapy mobilization, increased transfusional support, more apheresis procedures, and more frequent hospitalization. Other costs often omitted include the need for hospitalization, which was seen in 5% to 11% of the patients in our study. Parenteral antibiotics were needed when fever developed in 7% of patients with Hodgkin disease, 4% with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 24% with multiple myeloma who underwent mobilization using a chemotherapy pulse. When stem cell mobilization was not immediately optimal, subsequent attempts to mobilize failed completely in 3 of 42 patients (7%) with Hodgkin disease (3% of the original Hodgkin disease cohort), 56 of 157 (36%) with multiple myeloma (6% of the original myeloma cohort), and 50 of 328 (15%) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (7% of the original non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohort). These usually unappreciated costs of stem cell mobilization failure highlight the need for more effective mobilization strategies. Disclosures: Gertz: genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Cryopreservation of Autologous Stem Cell Grafts: Impact of Patient Age, Initial Collection, and Stem Cell Mobilization Regimen.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1178.1178 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1178-1178

Author(s):

Hien Duong ◽

Carol Dumont ◽

Paul Elson ◽

Edward A. Copelan ◽

Brian J. Bolwell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Recovery ◽

Storage Duration ◽

Patient Age ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Patient Âgé ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 1178 Background: Effectively cryopreserving hematopietic peripheral blood progenitor cells (HPC(A)) until time of transplant is critical for successful autologous stem cell transplant. It is important to demonstrate long-term HPC(A) viability and recovery and also to identify patient characteristics that may influence this. We evaluated HPC(A) products cryopreserved over 16 year period. We analyzed potential correlations between total nucleated cell (TNC) and CD34+ recovery and viability and patient age, initial collection, and impact of stem cell mobilization regimen. Method: Samples were obtained from expired patients, chosen based on storage duration but randomly selected in regard to patient and product characteristics; 23 samples were obtained from 18 patients. Five patients had 2 samples each; for duplicate samples, data were averaged (collection dates and thaw dates were similar). All HPC(A) products were frozen in autologous plasma and 10% DMSO, then stored in liquid phase or vapor phase nitrogen. Products were uniformly thawed and washed to remove DMSO. Analysis included 7-Amino-actinomycin D viability, TNC and CD34+ cell counts and recovery. Some samples had post-thaw CD34+ cell counts that exceeded pre-thaw count; for these, the recovery was set to 100%. Spearman rank correlations were used to analyze association between the different parameters. Wilcoxon rank sum test and analysis of covariance were used to compare patient groups. Result: Median patient age at time of stem cell collection was 54 (range 2–75) years. A majority of patients had lymphoma (61%) or multiple myeloma (22%). Most (56%) were mobilized using G-CSF+VP16, 33% with G-CSF alone, and 11% other. Samples were cryopreserved for a median of 8 years (range 1–16). Median (range) for total CD34+ × 106 collected was 547 (43-5845). Median (range) for CD34+/kg × 106 was 8 (1-59). Median (range) count/bag for TNC × 108 was 144 (37-285) and for CD34+ × 106 was 105 (8-805). Median (range) recovery and viability were 85% (32-213%), and 70% (46-85%) respectively for TNC; and 97% (16-359%) and 80% (61-98%), respectively for CD34+ cells. Pre- and post- thaw TNC and CD34+ counts were both highly correlated (r=0.95, p<.0001 in both cases – figures 1a and b). There was no significant association between TNC recovery and viability (r=-0.07, p=.79) or between CD34+ cell recovery and viability (r=-0.21, p=.41). Storage duration did not impact CD34+ recovery or viability (r=-0.01, p=.98 and -0.18, p=.47, respectively); or TNC viability (r=-0.13, p=.62). There was, however a significant positive correlation between the storage duration and TNC recovery (r=0.81, p<.0001). Age did not significantly impact TNC or CD34+ recovery (r=-0.05, p=0.86, and r=-0.26, p=0.29, respectively); however there was suggestion of negative impact on viability (r=-0.45, p=0.06 and r=-0.42, p=0.08, respectively, figures 1a and 1b). Overall, there did not appear to be a correlation between the initial TNC count/bag or total CD34+ cell dose on recovery or viability (r=0.29, r=-0.22, r=0.18, r=-0.38, respectively; all p>0.12). However, when patients were stratified according to total collection >25×106 CD34+ cells/kg or ≤25 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, there was better %CD34+ cell count recovery between groups (p = 0.07, median recovery 81% for 13 patients with ≤25 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg and 100% for 5 patients with >25×106 CD34+ cells/kg). For mobilization regimen, there was no significant difference in TNC recovery or viability (p = 0.19 and p=0.76, respectively) or CD34+ viability (p = 0.53), however there was suggestion that CD34+ recovery was greater with G-CSF+VP16 (p=0.06, see figure 2), independent of storage time. Conclusion: Products cryopreserved for 16 years retain acceptable recovery and viability. Unexpectedly, storage duration positively correlated with TNC recovery, and CD34+ cell recovery of >100% was noted in several samples. Reasons for this are unclear, but are likely related to changes in enumeration method or use of methods validated for counting fresh cells. Patient age was suggested to negatively impact post-thaw HPC(A) viability. Our data also suggested that the mobilization regimen or the CD34+ cell collection yield may affect the CD34+ cell recovery, possibly reflecting differences in graft characteristics. The number of patients included is relatively small and these findings warrant further studies for validation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

High Number of Successful Mobilizations Associated with the Use of Plerixafor and Colony Stimulating Factors In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Lymphoma Treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2263.2263 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2263-2263

Author(s):

Nelly G. Adel ◽

Mathew Sherry ◽

Stephen J. Harnicar ◽

Emily Mccullagh ◽

Heather Landau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Published Data ◽

First Line ◽

Colony Stimulating Factors ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 2263 Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the only curative option for many lymphoma patients and it is an integral component of treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Stem cell mobilization has most commonly been performed using either chemotherapy and colony-stimulating factors or colony stimulating factors alone. This approach was challenged by the inability to collect enough CD 34 cell count to perform an ASCT. Plerixafor (Mozobil ®) previously known as AMD3100, a selective antagonist of CXCR4, has recently been approved for ASCT mobilization in combination with granulocyte- colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for both multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients and is effective for patients who failed to mobilize enough CD34 cells with other modalities. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study examines all adult patients with MM and lymphoma who received plerixafor as a mobilization agent for ASCT at Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center between January 1st, 2009 and August 1st, 2010. Patient's information was obtained from the pharmacy data base and electronic medical records. Data included demographics, diagnosis, first line mobilization regimen, second and third line regimens, doses of plerixafor received, number of pheresis sessions and CD34 cells per kg collected per each session. The primary objective was to determine how many patients failed stem cell collection following mobilization at our center. Results: Fifty-six adult patients with lymphoma (N=23) and MM (N=33) were identified. Patients were excluded if they were treated for a pediatric malignancy or an alternate diagnosis. The average number of pheresis and CD34 cells/kg collected in each group are shown Table 1. Forty-three percent (10/23) patients with lymphoma received plerixafor and G-CSF as the first line option for mobilization and 57% (13/23) received plerixafor and G-CSF after failing other regimens. A total of 5 (22%) patients with lymphoma failed collection following mobilization with plerixafor, 1 as a primary mobilization failure and 4 having failed other mobilization strategies. Thirty-nine percent (13/33) of patients with MM received plerixafor and G-CSF as the first line option for mobilization and 61% (20/33)after failing other regimens, including cyclophosphamide (N=15) and G-CSF alone (N=5). Among the patients mobilized with plerixafor, 6% (2/33) failed collection, 1 who received plerixafor and G-CSF for primary mobilization and only 1 after failing other regimens. Conclusion: In lymphoma and MM patients plerixafor in combination with G-CSF is effective for stem cell mobilization and in this study we report higher success rates than in previously published data. The few number of failures with plerixafor plus G-CSF given as a primary mobilization regimen, supports its use in this setting and is attractive considering that it can reduce patient's exposure to chemotherapy. Disclosures: Matasar: Genzyme Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Plerixafor and G-CSF For Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization In AL Amyloidosis: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4516.4516 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4516-4516

Author(s):

Esha Kaul ◽

Gunjan L Shah ◽

Chakra P Chaulagain ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

High Dose ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Background Risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (SCT) is standard initial therapy for a minority of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (Blood 2013;121: 5124; Blood 2011;118: 4298). Stem cell mobilization is often accomplished with high dose G-CSF (16μg/kg/d) (Blood 2011;118:4346). In the current era with effective new agents such as bortezomib, many AL patients are receiving initial therapy and achieving profound rapid cytoreduction with organ improvement (Blood 2012;119:4391; Blood 2011;118:86). But not all patients respond and in some cases the duration of response is limited. In addition, the use of SCT for consolidation after an initial response, although reasonable, has not been systematically evaluated. Whether SCT is employed as consolidation or as a second- or third-line option, the efficacy and tolerance of mobilization become important issues. Because AL patients have organ involvement limiting chemotherapy-based mobilization options, we decided to explore the option of Plerixafor and G-CSF for stem cell mobilization, based on the phase III experience in MM (Blood 2009;113:5720). We now report the first experience with this mobilization approach in AL. Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by standard criteria including, in all cases, tissue biopsies showing amyloidosis. They were mobilized and collected between 4/16/12 and 6/19/13 with G-CSF 10μg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) for 5 days (continued through collection process) and Plerixafor adjusted for renal function starting on day 4 and continuing until collection was completed. Results We report on 10 patients whose median age at mobilization was 58 years (range 46-72), 60% of whom were men. Median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-3). Heart and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs (7 patients in each group). Median time from diagnosis to mobilization was 9 months (range 2-123). Eight patients had received prior bortezomib-based therapy. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6). One had received a prior MEL 140 transplant 10 years prior and had relapsed, and 2 were treatment naïve, one of whom was 1 year status post orthotopic heart transplant. At the time of mobilization, 3 patients had non-responsive hematologic disease, 3 had achieved PR, 1 VGPR and 1 had achieved CR. Five patients had a creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL including 2 patients on hemodialysis. The target cell dose was 10x106CD34/kg for all but one patient (with previous history of transplantation). The median number of collections was 2 (range 2-3). On day one, the median number of CD34+ cells collected per kg was 3.6 x106 (0.4-6x106) and on day two 6.4 x106 (2.7-19x106). The median total CD34+ cells collected per kg was 12.5x106 (5-18x106). Two patients had grade 1 bleeding from the catheter site during apheresis and one patient had dyspnea with suspected fluid overload which responded to a single dose of intravenous furosemide. There were no significant toxicities observed with Plerixafor in mobilization. All patients went on to receive high dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant. The median length of hospital stay was 25 days (18-32). The median stem cell dose infused was 7.6x106CD34/kg and median days to ANC > 500 was 11 (10-22), to platelets > 20K untransfused 22 (15-44) and to lymphocytes > 500/μl 14.5 (11-25). One patient who had VOD and persistent thrombocytopenia was given the remainder of his stem cells on day +31 with full recovery and normalization of the blood counts by day +65. Conclusions In the era of more effective initial therapies, an era in which AL patients are living longer, many with moderate organ damage, mobilization with Plerixafor and G-CSF was well tolerated and made it possible to collect ample numbers of CD34+ cells with limited leukaphereses in previously treated patients and in those with advanced renal failure. This approach not only allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells for optimal immediate stem cell dosing but also permitted the cryopreservation of aliquots for post-SCT boost and potentially for future cell-based therapies. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Non Interventional Prospective Clinical Study on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Relapsed Lymphomas

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3852.3852 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3852-3852

Author(s):

Gwendolyn van Gorkom ◽

Herve Finel ◽

Sebastian Giebel ◽

David Pohlreich ◽

Avichai Shimoni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Clinical Study ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Prospective Clinical Study ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Relapsed Lymphoma ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for many patients with relapsed chemosensitive lymphoma. Peripheral blood stem cells have become the main source for the ASCT worldwide, because of its advantages over bone marrow. Several risk factors have been identified for poor stem cell mobilization, and diagnosis of lymphoma is one of the most important ones, with an inadequate stem cell harvest reported in 4 to 25% of the cases. Even though stem cell mobilization in relapsed lymphoma patients can be relatively difficult, mobilization strategies have not been standardized and there is a significant variation amongst centers. The aim of this non-interventional prospective clinical study was to review the mobilization strategies used by EBMT centers in relapsed lymphoma and to evaluate the failure rates. Methods: All EBMT centers were invited to participate in this non-interventional prospective clinical study that was started in 2010 and ended in 2014. Centers were requested to collect data on all consecutive patients with relapsed lymphoma considered to be candidates for an ASCT and were 18 years of age or older. Data collected included age, sex, diagnosis, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, mobilization regimen, collected CD34+ cells and marrow harvests. Results: In total, 275 patients with relapsed lymphoma from 30 EBMT centers were registered for this study. There were 158 males and 117 females with a median age of 51 (range 18 – 77) years; 181 patients (66%) with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) (DLBCL 28%, FL 17%, MCL 6%, PTL, 3%, other 12%) and 94 patients (34%) with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). The median number of chemotherapy lines received before this relapse was one (range 1 – 8). 263 patients (96%) were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF being DHAP (43%) and ESHAP (11%) the most frequent protocols, and 12 patients (4%) were mobilized with G-CSF alone. Thirteen patients (5%) who were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF, received additional PLX in the first mobilization. These were all patients that were mobilized with chemotherapy as part of the mobilization regimen. Thirty patients (11%) failed to mobilize adequate stem cells (<2 x 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg) during first mobilization despite the use of PLX in four patients. The median number of stem cells collected at first mobilization was 5.6 x 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg (range: 0 – 82). In 255 patients (92.7%) only one mobilization course was given, 18 patients (6.5%) had two mobilization courses, 2 patients (0.7%) underwent three mobilization courses. Three patients had a mobilization failure after only G-CSF; they all were successfully harvested in a second attempt after chemotherapy + G-CSF. Five of the patients failing the first mobilization with chemotherapy + G-CSF received PLX at second mobilization, but only three succeeded. One patient failed both first and second mobilization and received PLX at third mobilization without success. 22 patients (8%) still had an inadequate amount of stem cells in the end. Of those, only 4 patients (1.5%) underwent bone marrow harvest. Conclusion: In the EBMT centers participating in this study, a primary mobilization strategy based on the combination of salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF was used for virtually all patients with relapsed lymphoma. PLX was used in only 5% of the mobilization procedures during the time period analyzed. With 11% after the first mobilization attempt and 8% after several attempts, the failure rate was relatively low. Disclosures van Gorkom: Sanofi: Research Funding. Sureda:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Autologous transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor–primed bone marrow is effective in supporting myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies and poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2003-02-0440 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 102 (5) ◽

pp. 1595-1600 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Roberto M. Lemoli ◽

Antonio de Vivo ◽

Daniela Damiani ◽

Alessandro Isidori ◽

Monica Tani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽

High Dose Chemotherapy ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

High Dose ◽

Myeloablative Chemotherapy ◽

Hematopoietic Recovery ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Stimulating Factor

AbstractWe assessed the hematopoietic recovery and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) of patients who had failed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and subsequently received high-dose chemotherapy supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–primed bone marrow (BM). Studied were 86 heavily pretreated consecutive patients with acute leukemia (n = 21), refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 41) and Hodgkin disease (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 7). There were 78 patients who showed insufficient mobilization of CD34+ cells (< 10 cells/μL), whereas 8 patients collected less than 1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. BM was primed in vivo for 3 days with 15 to 16 μg/kg of subcutaneous G-CSF. Median numbers of nucleated cells, colony-forming unit cells (CFU-Cs), and CD34+ cells per kilogram harvested were 3.5 × 108, 3.72 × 104, and 0.82 × 106, respectively. Following myeloablative chemotherapy, median times to achieve a granulocyte count higher than 0.5 × 109/L and an unsupported platelet count higher than 20 and 50 × 109/L were 13 (range, 8-24), 15 (range, 12-75), and 22 (range, 12-180) days, respectively, for lymphoma/myeloma patients and 23 (range, 13-53), 52 (range, 40-120), and 90 (range, 46-207) days, respectively, for leukemia patients. Median times to hospital discharge after transplantation were 17 (range, 12-40) and 27 (range, 14-39) days for lymphoma/myeloma and acute leukemia patients, respectively. TRM was 4.6%, whereas 15 patients died of disease. G-CSF–primed BM induces effective multilineage hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and can be safely used in patients with poor stem cell mobilization.

Download Full-text

G-CSF Plus Preemptive Plerixafor Versus Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5823.5823 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5823-5823

Author(s):

Ahmad Antar ◽

Zaher Otrock ◽

Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja ◽

Hussein Abou Ghaddara ◽

Nabila Kreidieh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Yield ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

High Dose ◽

Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: The optimal stem cell mobilization regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined. Most transplant centers use either a chemo-mobilization strategy using cyclophosphamide (CY) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or a steady state strategy using G-CSF alone or with plerixafor in case of mobilization failure. However, very few studies compared efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide (CY) and G-CSF versus G-CSF with preemptive plerixafor. In this study, we retrospectively compared our single center experience at the American University of Beirut in 89 MM patients using fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF as our past preferred chemo-mobilization strategy in MM patients with our new mobilization strategy using G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor. The change in practice was implemented when plerixafor became available, in order to avoid CY associated toxicity. Patients and methods: Patients in the CY group (n=62) (Table 1) received either fractionated high-dose CY (n=56) (5g/m2 divided in 5 doses of 1g/m2 every 3 hours) or CY at 50mg/kg/day for 2 doses (n=6). G-CSF was started on day +6 of chemotherapy at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours. All patients in the plerixafor group (n=27) (Table 1) received G-CSF at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours daily for 4 days. On day 5, if peripheral blood CD34+ was ≥ 20/µl, apheresis was started immediately. Plerixafor (240 µg/kg) was given 7-11 hours before the first apheresis if CD34+ cell count on peripheral blood on day 5 was <20/µl and before the second apheresis if CD34+ cells on the first collect were <3х106/kg. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-3) in both groups. Results: Compared with plerixafor, CY use was associated with higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ counts (35 vs 111 cells/µl, P= 0.000003), and total CD34+ cell yield (7.5 х 106 vs 15.9 х 106 cells/kg, P= 0.003). All patients in both groups collected ≥4x106 CD34+ cells/Kg. Moreover, 60 (96.7%) and 46 (74.2%) patients in the CY group vs 24 (88.8%) and 6 (22%) patients in the plerixafor group collected >6х106 and >10x106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (P=0.16; P<0.00001). Only 4 (6.4%) patients required two apheresis sessions in the CY group compared to 11 (40%) in the plerixafor group (P=0.0001). Conversely, CY use was associated with higher frequency of febrile neutropenia (60% vs 0%; P<0.00001), blood transfusions (27% vs 0%; P<0.00001), platelets transfusion (25% vs 0%; P<0.00001) and hospitalizations (64% vs 0%; P<0.00001). No one required intensive level of care and all recovered. Autografting was successfully performed in all patients using high-dose melphalan with a median time from mobilization to the first transplant of 31 days (range: 16-156) in the CY group compared to 13 days (range: 8-40) in the plerixafor group (P=0.027); and median infused CD34+ cells were 7х106/kg (range: 3.1-15.3) versus 5.27 (2.6-7.45), respectively (P=0.002). The average total cost of mobilization using the adjusted costs based on National Social Security Fund (NSSF) prices in Lebanon in the plerixafor group was slightly higher compared with the CY group ($7964 vs $7536; P=0.16). Conclusions: Our data indicate robust stem cell mobilization in MM patients with either fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF or G-CSF alone with preemptive plerixafor. The chemo-mobilization approach was associated with two-fold stem cell yield, slightly lower cost (including cost of hospitalization) but significantly increased toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Comparison of CXCR-4 and Adhesion Molecule Expression in Healthy Bone Marrow with Expression in Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood of Patients Receiving G-CSF Plus AMD3100.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.1974.1974 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 1974-1974

Author(s):

Uta Oelschlaegel ◽

Martin Bornhaeuser ◽

Frank Kroschinsky ◽

Gerhard Ehninger ◽

Uwe Platzbecker

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adhesion Molecules ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Surface Expression ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Qualitative And Quantitative ◽

Healthy Donors ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract It is known that the crosstalk between adhesion molecules, bone marrow microenvironment, and cytokines facilitates the multi step process of stem cell mobilization from bone marrow to peripheral blood. A combination of G-CSF plus AMD3100 - a CXCR-4 antagonist - has been shown to be safe and efficient in stem cell mobilization of healthy donors and cancer patients. Nevertheless, data predicting the efficacy of this approach are still missing. The present study investigated the correlation of the expression of CXCR-4 (CD184) and adhesion molecules with the kinetics and efficacy of stem cell mobilization in nine patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) or NHL, respectively. Steady-state mobilization was performed using a combination of G-CSF (Filgrastim, 10μg/kg/d, 8 am) for 4 days followed by AMD3100 (240μg/kg) on day 4 at 10pm. Autologous aphereses were started on day 5. Bone marrow and peripheral blood (PB) before AMD3100 application (day 4) and PB on day 5 were investigated with a 4-color flow cytometric procedure. Bone marrow aspirates of healthy donors (n=20) served as control. The qualitative (%) and quantitative (mean fluorescence intensity, [MFI]) antigen expression of CXCR-4 in relation to CD34 was assessed as well as the expression of certain adhesion molecules including LFA-1, PECAM-1, VLA-1, L-selectin and CD44. First, the median percentage of CXCR-4 surface expression in healthy bone marrow was significantly higher (92%; range: 52 – 99%) than in patients bone marrow (70%; 30 – 88%; p=0.002), PB before AMD3100 (87%; 35 – 97%; p=0.050) and on day 5 (17%; 2 – 74%; p<0.001), whereas cytoplasmic expression was comparable (91%; 53 – 95%) in all cell compartments. The median quantitative CXCR-4 surface expression was significantly decreased in PB on day 5 compared to pre AMD3100 (14 vs. 95; p=0.003). Furthermore, the qualitative expression of LFA-1 and the quantitative expression of LFA-1, PECAM-1, VLA-1, and CD44 were also downregulated in response to AMD3100 (p<0.010). Second, a median of 63/μl (range: 15 – 132/μl) CD34+ cells was measured in the PB on day 5. Thus, a high absolute count of CD34+ cells in the PB on day 5 significantly correlated with lower qualitative and quantitative CXCR-4 expression in the same material (r=0.833; p=0.015). Evaluating CXCR-4 expression in bone marrow, PB before AMD3100 and on day 5 no significant correlation to CD34+ counts could be detected. However, there was one very poor mobilizing patient (15/μl CD34+ cells on day 5) in whom the quantitative CXCR-4 expression in the bone marrow was significantly higher than the median of all patients (MFI 95 vs. 26). Furthermore, some of the adhesion molecules (L-selectin, VLA-4, and CD44) showed a rather positive correlation with CD34 count. In summary, these preliminary data suggest that the amount of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood after G-CSF plus AMD3100 application seems to be negatively correlated with CXCR-4 expression. A higher quantitative CXCR-4 expression in the bone marrow pre AMD3100 might predict a lower mobilization efficacy.

Download Full-text