Daily Measurements of Blood CD34+ Cells After Stem Cell Mobilization Predict Stem Cell Yield and Posttransplant Hematopoietic Recovery

AbstractWe assessed the hematopoietic recovery and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) of patients who had failed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and subsequently received high-dose chemotherapy supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–primed bone marrow (BM). Studied were 86 heavily pretreated consecutive patients with acute leukemia (n = 21), refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 41) and Hodgkin disease (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 7). There were 78 patients who showed insufficient mobilization of CD34+ cells (< 10 cells/μL), whereas 8 patients collected less than 1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. BM was primed in vivo for 3 days with 15 to 16 μg/kg of subcutaneous G-CSF. Median numbers of nucleated cells, colony-forming unit cells (CFU-Cs), and CD34+ cells per kilogram harvested were 3.5 × 108, 3.72 × 104, and 0.82 × 106, respectively. Following myeloablative chemotherapy, median times to achieve a granulocyte count higher than 0.5 × 109/L and an unsupported platelet count higher than 20 and 50 × 109/L were 13 (range, 8-24), 15 (range, 12-75), and 22 (range, 12-180) days, respectively, for lymphoma/myeloma patients and 23 (range, 13-53), 52 (range, 40-120), and 90 (range, 46-207) days, respectively, for leukemia patients. Median times to hospital discharge after transplantation were 17 (range, 12-40) and 27 (range, 14-39) days for lymphoma/myeloma and acute leukemia patients, respectively. TRM was 4.6%, whereas 15 patients died of disease. G-CSF–primed BM induces effective multilineage hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and can be safely used in patients with poor stem cell mobilization.

Download Full-text

G-CSF Plus Preemptive Plerixafor Versus Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5823.5823 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5823-5823

Author(s):

Ahmad Antar ◽

Zaher Otrock ◽

Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja ◽

Hussein Abou Ghaddara ◽

Nabila Kreidieh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Yield ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

High Dose ◽

Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: The optimal stem cell mobilization regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined. Most transplant centers use either a chemo-mobilization strategy using cyclophosphamide (CY) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or a steady state strategy using G-CSF alone or with plerixafor in case of mobilization failure. However, very few studies compared efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide (CY) and G-CSF versus G-CSF with preemptive plerixafor. In this study, we retrospectively compared our single center experience at the American University of Beirut in 89 MM patients using fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF as our past preferred chemo-mobilization strategy in MM patients with our new mobilization strategy using G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor. The change in practice was implemented when plerixafor became available, in order to avoid CY associated toxicity. Patients and methods: Patients in the CY group (n=62) (Table 1) received either fractionated high-dose CY (n=56) (5g/m2 divided in 5 doses of 1g/m2 every 3 hours) or CY at 50mg/kg/day for 2 doses (n=6). G-CSF was started on day +6 of chemotherapy at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours. All patients in the plerixafor group (n=27) (Table 1) received G-CSF at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours daily for 4 days. On day 5, if peripheral blood CD34+ was ≥ 20/µl, apheresis was started immediately. Plerixafor (240 µg/kg) was given 7-11 hours before the first apheresis if CD34+ cell count on peripheral blood on day 5 was <20/µl and before the second apheresis if CD34+ cells on the first collect were <3х106/kg. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-3) in both groups. Results: Compared with plerixafor, CY use was associated with higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ counts (35 vs 111 cells/µl, P= 0.000003), and total CD34+ cell yield (7.5 х 106 vs 15.9 х 106 cells/kg, P= 0.003). All patients in both groups collected ≥4x106 CD34+ cells/Kg. Moreover, 60 (96.7%) and 46 (74.2%) patients in the CY group vs 24 (88.8%) and 6 (22%) patients in the plerixafor group collected >6х106 and >10x106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (P=0.16; P<0.00001). Only 4 (6.4%) patients required two apheresis sessions in the CY group compared to 11 (40%) in the plerixafor group (P=0.0001). Conversely, CY use was associated with higher frequency of febrile neutropenia (60% vs 0%; P<0.00001), blood transfusions (27% vs 0%; P<0.00001), platelets transfusion (25% vs 0%; P<0.00001) and hospitalizations (64% vs 0%; P<0.00001). No one required intensive level of care and all recovered. Autografting was successfully performed in all patients using high-dose melphalan with a median time from mobilization to the first transplant of 31 days (range: 16-156) in the CY group compared to 13 days (range: 8-40) in the plerixafor group (P=0.027); and median infused CD34+ cells were 7х106/kg (range: 3.1-15.3) versus 5.27 (2.6-7.45), respectively (P=0.002). The average total cost of mobilization using the adjusted costs based on National Social Security Fund (NSSF) prices in Lebanon in the plerixafor group was slightly higher compared with the CY group ($7964 vs $7536; P=0.16). Conclusions: Our data indicate robust stem cell mobilization in MM patients with either fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF or G-CSF alone with preemptive plerixafor. The chemo-mobilization approach was associated with two-fold stem cell yield, slightly lower cost (including cost of hospitalization) but significantly increased toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Plerixafor Administered At 5:00PM for Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma and Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4061.4061 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4061-4061

Author(s):

Jennifer Tornatta ◽

John J. Maciejewski ◽

Sunita Nathan ◽

Bruce Mcleod ◽

Sridevi Palaparthy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Yield ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Dosing Schedule ◽

Pharmacodynamic Profile ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 4061 Background: High-dose chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are effective treatment strategies for patients with life-threatening hematologic malignancies. A critical step to the success of transplantation is achieving adequate mobilization of CD34+ stem cells from the bone marrow into the peripheral blood to provide sufficient cell yield after apheresis for the transplant. Plerixafor combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has proven efficacious in mobilizing CD34+ stem cells in patients with lymphoma and myeloma prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. In the phase 3 clinical trials of plerixafor plus G-CSF for SCM, plerixafor was administered at 10:00 pm on days prior to apheresis. This dosing schedule is based on the peak level of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood (PB) at 11–14 hours after administration; however PB CD34+ cell levels were elevated from 4–18 hours after plerixafor administration. Due to inconvenience in dosing plerixafor at 10:00pm, we took advantage of its pharmacodynamic profile and explored an alternative dosing schedule, giving plerixafor at 5:00 pm. Here, we report our updated experience with the efficacy of this schedule. Method: We performed a retrospective study using our Stem Cell Harvest database. A total of 58 patients (31 lymphoma, 27 myeloma) underwent mobilization with G-CSF + plerixafor, either as front-line (n=51) or as salvage (n=7) mobilization strategies between February 2009 through May 2010. Mobilization consisted of G-CSF 10 μg/kg SC administered daily at 6:00 am day 1 through 4 plus plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg SC given once daily at 5:00 pm in an outpatient clinic beginning on day 4. For patients with renal impairment (ie, creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/min), the dose of plerixafor was lowered by a third to 0.16 mg/kg. Daily apheresis began at 8:30 am on the morning of day 5 and continued for up to 4 days, with a minimum collection goal defined as ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for lymphoma patients and ≥ 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for myeloma patients. Mobilization with G-CSF plus plerixafor and apheresis were halted once the minimum goal was reached between day 2 and 4 of apheresis, or after a single collection achieved the optimal goal which was defined as ≥ 4 × 106 (lymphoma) or ≥ 8 × 106 (myeloma) CD34+ cells/kg. The mobilization strategy was considered a failure if patients did not reach the minimum CD34+ cell collection goal within the 4 days of apheresis. Results: G-CSF + plerixafor mobilization yielded a median 5.13 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range, 0.06–25.8) in a median of 2 apheresis days. Forty-five of 58 (78%) patients achieved the minimum CD34+ cells/kg required for transplantation, including 30 (52%) patients who achieved this goal on the first day of apheresis. Overall, 52 (90%) patients proceeded to transplantation, with median neutrophil and platelet engraftment times of 11 and 18 days, respectively. Conclusion: In summary, the alternative 5:00 pm dosing of plerixafor for stem cell mobilization provided a more convenient dosing schedule while ensuring that a majority of lymphoma and myeloma patients achieved the minimum CD34+ cell yield required to proceed to transplantation. Disclosures: Tornatta: Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Fung:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

The Combination of Cyclophosphamide and Thalidomide During Induction Therapy for Multiple Myeloma Results in a High Rate of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2147.2147 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2147-2147

Author(s):

Holger W Auner ◽

Luca Mazzarella ◽

Lucy Cook ◽

Richard Szydlo ◽

Francesca Saltarelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Drug Combinations ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Yield ◽

High Rate ◽

Control Group ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 2147 Poster Board II-124 In the era of novel therapeutic agents, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an integral component of treatment for multiple myeloma (MM), with a proportion of patients undergoing more than one ASCT during the course of their disease. Therefore, the choice of new drug combinations for induction therapies must take into consideration the requirement to collect a sufficient number of stem cells, which is also reflected in a recently published consensus perspective of the International Myeloma Working Group. The immunomodulatory drug Lenalidomide and the alkylating agent Melphalan have a substantial impact on stem cell mobilization, but the effect of induction therapies containing either Thalidomide or Cyclophosphamide on the stem cell collection yield is negligible. We considered the possibility that the combination of Cyclophosphamide and Thalidomide, which is widely used as an induction regime particularly in the UK as part of the CTD regime (with Dexamethasone), could have an additive impact on the stem cell pool and cause mobilization failures. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell mobilizations in MM patients performed at our institution over a four-year period in patients who had received CTD (n=55), and compared them with a control group of patients (n=56) who had received VAD (Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Dexamethasone; n=30) or Z-Dex (Idarubicin, Dexamethasone; n=26) during the same period. There were no differences between the CTD and control group in terms of age, MM subtype, disease stage, or remission status at the time of stem cell mobilization. All mobilizations were performed with Cyclophosphamide (4g/m2) and G-CSF (5-10μg/kg). Apheresis was attempted when the peripheral blood CD34 count was >10 × 103/ml, and the standard harvest target was 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, with a minimal target of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The total number of CD34+ cells harvested was substantially lower in the CTD group (5.2 vs. 9.7 × 106/kg, p=0.002), and a higher number of patients in the CTD group underwent more than one apheresis procedure (52.8% vs. 32.1%, p=0.012). The number of CD34+ cells harvested on the first day of apheresis and per apheresis procedure were also lower in the CTD group (2.8 vs. 7.3 × 106/kg, p=0.002; 2.6 vs. 6.7 × 106/kg, p=0.002). More patients in the CTD group failed to achieve both the standard (36.4% vs. 16.1%, p=0.021) and minimal (19.2% vs. 5.4%, p=0.036) stem cell harvest target. The failure rate on the first day of apheresis was also higher in the CTD group both for the standard (56.3% vs. 28.6%, p=0.003) and the minimal target (36.7% vs. 16.1%, p=0.041). There was no difference in stem cell yield between the VAD and Z-Dex groups. Age and number of induction chemotherapy cycles did not have an impact on mobilization failure in the entire cohort or the CTD group alone. In the CTD group, 18% of patients underwent re-mobilization with Etoposide (1.6g/ m2) and G-CSF (n=8), or with Plerixafor (240μg/kg) and G-CSF (n=2), which was successful in all patients. These results demonstrate that the CTD induction regime results in a high rate of stem cell mobilization failures, which is associated with the requirement for an increased number of apheresis and re-mobilization procedures. The observations provide novel evidence that drugs with no previously demonstrated significant effect on stem cell mobilization can have a considerable negative impact on the stem cell yield when used in combination. The possible benefit of new drug combinations has to be balanced against the increase in cost, the potentially higher rate of complications, and delays or failures to progress to ASCT resulting from impaired stem cell mobilization. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A Naive NK Cell Repertoire in the Circulation of Haploidentical Stem Cell Donors Pre Mobilization Predicts Rejection of Cord Myeloid Cells in Patients Undergoing Combined Haploidentical and Unrelated Cord Blood HSCT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2199.2199 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2199-2199

Author(s):

Mattias Carlsten ◽

Robert N. Reger ◽

Ritesh Kotecha ◽

Enkhtsetseg Purev ◽

Xin Tian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Cord Blood ◽

Nk Cells ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Repertoire ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Unrelated Cord Blood

Abstract Background: For patients (pts) with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) lacking an HLA identical donor, outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using unrelated cord blood (UCB) units or haplo-identical donors (HDs) have historically been associated with high graft failure rates and poor survival. In an ongoing clinical trial at the NHLBI, we have observed excellent engraftment (100%) and survival (91%) in SAA pts (n=27) receiving a transplant that co-infuses a single UCB unit with CD34-selectedCD3-depletedcells from a haplo-identical relative. Although cord myeloid engraftment(defined as cord ANC >500/μL) occurred at<day 100 in the majority of pts, a significant fraction of pts had delayed (>day 100) or no cord myeloid engraftment. In this analysis, we investigated factors that may have impeded cord myeloid engraftment following UCB/HD transplantation. Methods: Flow-based NK cell phenotyping using a BD Fortessa II instrument was performed on blood obtained pre-transplant from HDs used for the first 18 SAA pts undergoing UCB/HD transplantation. Lineage specific chimerism was measured by PCR of microsatellites (PowerPlex 16 HS Systemkit/Promega) using DNA from flow sorted cells (BD FACSAria) collected multiple time points post-transplant.KIR-ligand incompatibility in the HD vs UCB directionwas defined using high-resolution HLA typing. Results: 13/18 (72%) pts had cord myeloid engraftment before day 100 while 5/18 (28%) had delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment. Remarkably, delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment occurred exclusively in pts transplanted with KIR-ligand incompatibility in the HD vs UCB direction (n=9) (Figure 1A). In contrast, all 9 pts transplanted with KIR-ligand compatibility in the HD vs UCB direction achieved cord myeloid engraftment by ²day 48 (median day 35) post-transplant. Chimerism analysis performed on blood obtained 30+ days post-transplant revealed NK cell chimerism was ³ 90% cord in origin in all 9 pts transplanted with KIR-ligand compatible grafts. In contrast, amongst the 9 pts receiving a KIR-ligand incompatible transplant, NK cell chimerism was predominantly HD in origin with only a minor fraction of cord NK cells detected 30-200 days post-transplant (Figure 1B). Predominant HD NK cell chimerism in pts receiving a KIR-ligand incompatible transplant was associated with lower degrees of cord myeloid chimerism compared to KIR-ligand compatible recipients. Further analysis of the KIR-ligand incompatible cohort revealed distinct heterogeneity in the time to cord myeloid engraftment (Figure 1A). Although delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment was observed in 5/9 recipients of KIR-ligand incompatible transplants, 4/9 pts in this cohort had cord engraftment at a similar time as pts transplanted with KIR-ligand compatible grafts (median 35 vs. 35 days). This variability in time to cord myeloid engraftment was not associated with stem cell dose, degree of HD NK cell chimerism, type of KIR-ligand incompatibility or KIR haplotype. However, we observed a strong correlation between the proportion of naive NK cells in circulation of HDs before stem cell mobilization with delayed or no myeloid cord engraftment (Figure 1C). With the exception of one patient who had failed HD engraftment, only transplants of CD34+ cells from HDs with a predominantly naive NK cell repertoire, expressing high frequencies of the NKG2A receptor concomitant with low frequencies of NKG2C, Lir-1 and CD57 resulted in delayed or no cord myeloid engraftment (p<0.05). Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that NK cells from engrafting CD34+ cells from selected HDs can significantly delay or completely inhibit cord myeloid engraftment following UCB/HD transplantation. Suppression of cord hematopoiesis appears to be restricted to NK cells originating from HDs withHD vs UCB KIR-ligand incompatibility who have a large naive NK cell repertoire in their circulation prior to stem cell mobilization. The myelosuppressive effects of these NK cells are consistent with recentlypublished data showing a naive NK cell repertoire in stem cell donors predicts a reduced risk of AML relapse post-allogeneic HSCT.Further studies defining the mechanisms through which naive NK cells suppress cord hematopoiesis followingUCB/HDtransplantation could shed insights into methods to optimize NK cell mediated graft-vs-leukemia followingallogeneicHSCT of myeloid leukemias. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

When to harvest peripheral-blood stem cells after mobilization therapy: prediction of CD34-positive cell yield by preceding day CD34-positive concentration in peripheral blood.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1996.14.3.970 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 14 (3) ◽

pp. 970-973 ◽

Cited By ~ 94

Author(s):

C Elliott ◽

D M Samson ◽

S Armitage ◽

M P Lyttelton ◽

D McGuigan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Cell Number ◽

Cell Yield ◽

Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Blood Stem Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Wbc Count ◽

Therapy Prediction

PURPOSE To evaluate whether the CD34+ yield from a single peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) harvest could be predicted by measurement of the patient's circulating WBC and CD34+ cell concentrations on the day before harvest. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-nine patients with hematologic or nonhematologic malignancy underwent 41 stem-cell mobilization episodes with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and a total of 63 leukapheresis procedures were performed. Peripheral-blood samples were analyzed for WBC and CD34+ cell concentration both on the day before and the day of leukapheresis. RESULTS The median WBC and CD34+ concentrations on the day preceding leukapheresis were 10.0 x 10(9)/L (range, 0.4 to 44.4) and 24.9 x 10(6)/L (range, 0.1 to 349.4), respectively. On the day of harvest, the corresponding figures were 15.1 x 10(9)/L (range, 1.5 to 52.6) and 29.3 x 10(6)/L (range, 0.1 to 543.1), respectively. The median CD34+ cell number collected in a single leukapheresis was 2.6 x 10(6)/kg body weight (range, 0.1 to 26.1). Both the preceding day (r = .84, P < .001) and harvest day (r = .95, P < .001) CD34+ circulating concentrations correlated significantly with the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram collected at leukapheresis. The correlation between CD34+ cells per kilogram collected and harvest day WBC count was also significant (r = .43, P <.001), but with the preceding day WBC count was nonsignificant. CONCLUSION The number of CD34+ cells harvested in a single leukapheresis can be predicted by measurement of the preceding day peripheral-blood circulating CD34+ concentration, and on the basis of these data a table of probable CD34+ cell yield has been constructed. This correlation may facilitate the efficient organization of leukapheresis procedures.

Download Full-text

Timing of Daratumumab Administered Pre-Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma Impacts Pre-Harvest Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cell Counts and Plerixafor Use

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140811 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 15-16

Author(s):

Danny Luan ◽

Paul J Christos ◽

Michael Ancharski ◽

Danielle Guarneri ◽

Roger Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽

Hematopoietic Recovery ◽

Cell Mobilization

Background: Daratumumab (DARA) is a monoclonal antibody which targets CD38 on plasma cells and B cell progenitors. DARA has been effectively combined with other therapies in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), while DARA-based induction regimens in transplant-eligible patients (pts) are increasingly being used in clinical practice. Given that hematopoietic stem cells also express CD38, DARA may potentially affect stem cell mobilization and hematopoietic reconstitution following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Although no clinically significant impact of DARA on stem cell mobilization or hematopoietic recovery was described in large phase 3 trials of triplet induction regimens +/- DARA in newly diagnosed MM, stem cell yields were lower and plerixafor more commonly used in the DARA-containing arms [Moreau et al, Lancet 2019; Voorhees et al, Blood 2020]. Significantly longer time to neutrophil (PMN) engraftment was also reported in pts receiving DARA-based induction who underwent upfront ASCT [Al Saleh et al, Am J Hematol 2020]. In this study, we examine the impact of timing of DARA administration pre-mobilization on day 4 pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 cell count, stem cell apheresis yield, and post-ASCT engraftment. Methods: Between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2019, newly diagnosed and RRMM pts receiving DARA-based induction regimens with ≥1 dose of DARA administered within 1 month prior to stem cell mobilization were identified retrospectively and compared to matched controls receiving similar induction regimens without DARA. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered per institutional standards and plerixafor added based on day 4 pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 counts. PMN and platelet engraftment post-ASCT was defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with sustained PMN count >500 x 106/L and independence from platelet transfusion in the preceding 7 days with a count >20 x 109/L, respectively. Pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 counts and stem cell apheresis yields were obtained from the Cellular Therapy Laboratory at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital. The study was approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine IRB. Results: We identified 16 pts who received DARA-based induction with ≥1 dose of DARA administered within 1 month of apheresis (DARA group) and 16 non-DARA-containing regimen-matched controls (non-DARA group). Demographics of the DARA and non-DARA groups were well matched (Table 1). DARA pts received their last dose of DARA a mean of 17.3 days prior to the first day of apheresis, with 8 pts receiving their last dose within 2 weeks and the remaining 8 pts between 2 weeks and 1 month prior. Overall, mobilization outcomes were inferior in the DARA group (Table 2). DARA pts had significantly lower day 4 pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 counts compared to non-DARA pts (17.2 vs 35.4 cells/µL; P=0.0146). Institutional algorithm required plerixafor to be given for day 4 CD34 count ≤40 cells/µL. Fifteen of the 16 DARA pts received plerixafor vs. 11 non-DARA pts (P=0.07). Additionally, DARA pts required significantly more apheresis days (2.4 vs 1.6 days; P=0.0279). Differences in stem cell yield were not significant (8 vs 10 x106cells/kg; P=0.1391). Hematopoietic recovery post-ASCT was not affected by DARA administered in the month preceding mobilization. Conclusions: In summary, we report lower day 4 pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 count, increased requirement for plerixafor, and longer apheresis duration in newly diagnosed and RRMM pts receiving DARA within 1 month ofstem cell mobilization. These limitations are largely overcome by plerixafor usage which, combined with G-CSF, resulted in successful stem cell collection in all patients. Limitations in our study include small sample sizes, retrospective control selection, and fewer pts in the DARA group achieving ≥VGPR prior to mobilization. Nevertheless, our findings are consistent with inferior mobilization outcomes reported in the DARA-containing arms of phase 3 trials of triplet induction +/- DARA and highlight the nearly universal requirement for plerixafor usage when DARA is administered within a month prior to apheresis. Prospective study of day 4 pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34 counts and other predictors of stem cell yield should be incorporated into future clinical trials of CD38 monoclonal antibody-based induction regimens for transplant-eligible MM pts. Disclosures Rossi: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Niesvizky:GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosenbaum:Amgen: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Akcea: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical Impact and Resource Utilization After Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2142.2142 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2142-2142

Author(s):

Morie A Gertz ◽

Robert Wolf ◽

Ivana N. Micallef ◽

Dennis A. Gastineau

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Growth Factors ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Resource Utilization ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Hodgkin Disease ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 2142 Poster Board II-119 High-dose chemotherapy in conjunction with autologous SCT is the preferred treatment of relapsed Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Failure to achieve optimal stem cell mobilization results in multiple subsequent attempts, which consumes large amounts of growth factors and potentially requires antibiotics and transfusions. We retrospectively reviewed the natural history of stem cell mobilization attempts at our institution from 2001 through 2007 to determine the frequency of suboptimal mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing autologous transplant and analyzed the subsequent resource utilization in patients with initially failed attempts. Of 1,775 patients undergoing mobilization during the study period, stem cell collection (defined by the number of CD34+ cells/kg) was “ optimal” (≥5×106) in 53%, “low” (≥2 to 5×106) in 25%,“ poor” (<2×106) in 10%, and “failed” (<10 CD34+ cells/mL) in 12%. In the 47% of collections that were less than optimal, increased resource consumption included increased use of growth factors and antibiotics, subsequent chemotherapy mobilization, increased transfusional support, more apheresis procedures, and more frequent hospitalization. Other costs often omitted include the need for hospitalization, which was seen in 5% to 11% of the patients in our study. Parenteral antibiotics were needed when fever developed in 7% of patients with Hodgkin disease, 4% with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 24% with multiple myeloma who underwent mobilization using a chemotherapy pulse. When stem cell mobilization was not immediately optimal, subsequent attempts to mobilize failed completely in 3 of 42 patients (7%) with Hodgkin disease (3% of the original Hodgkin disease cohort), 56 of 157 (36%) with multiple myeloma (6% of the original myeloma cohort), and 50 of 328 (15%) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (7% of the original non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohort). These usually unappreciated costs of stem cell mobilization failure highlight the need for more effective mobilization strategies. Disclosures: Gertz: genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Cryopreservation of Autologous Stem Cell Grafts: Impact of Patient Age, Initial Collection, and Stem Cell Mobilization Regimen.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1178.1178 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1178-1178

Author(s):

Hien Duong ◽

Carol Dumont ◽

Paul Elson ◽

Edward A. Copelan ◽

Brian J. Bolwell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Recovery ◽

Storage Duration ◽

Patient Age ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Patient Âgé ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 1178 Background: Effectively cryopreserving hematopietic peripheral blood progenitor cells (HPC(A)) until time of transplant is critical for successful autologous stem cell transplant. It is important to demonstrate long-term HPC(A) viability and recovery and also to identify patient characteristics that may influence this. We evaluated HPC(A) products cryopreserved over 16 year period. We analyzed potential correlations between total nucleated cell (TNC) and CD34+ recovery and viability and patient age, initial collection, and impact of stem cell mobilization regimen. Method: Samples were obtained from expired patients, chosen based on storage duration but randomly selected in regard to patient and product characteristics; 23 samples were obtained from 18 patients. Five patients had 2 samples each; for duplicate samples, data were averaged (collection dates and thaw dates were similar). All HPC(A) products were frozen in autologous plasma and 10% DMSO, then stored in liquid phase or vapor phase nitrogen. Products were uniformly thawed and washed to remove DMSO. Analysis included 7-Amino-actinomycin D viability, TNC and CD34+ cell counts and recovery. Some samples had post-thaw CD34+ cell counts that exceeded pre-thaw count; for these, the recovery was set to 100%. Spearman rank correlations were used to analyze association between the different parameters. Wilcoxon rank sum test and analysis of covariance were used to compare patient groups. Result: Median patient age at time of stem cell collection was 54 (range 2–75) years. A majority of patients had lymphoma (61%) or multiple myeloma (22%). Most (56%) were mobilized using G-CSF+VP16, 33% with G-CSF alone, and 11% other. Samples were cryopreserved for a median of 8 years (range 1–16). Median (range) for total CD34+ × 106 collected was 547 (43-5845). Median (range) for CD34+/kg × 106 was 8 (1-59). Median (range) count/bag for TNC × 108 was 144 (37-285) and for CD34+ × 106 was 105 (8-805). Median (range) recovery and viability were 85% (32-213%), and 70% (46-85%) respectively for TNC; and 97% (16-359%) and 80% (61-98%), respectively for CD34+ cells. Pre- and post- thaw TNC and CD34+ counts were both highly correlated (r=0.95, p<.0001 in both cases – figures 1a and b). There was no significant association between TNC recovery and viability (r=-0.07, p=.79) or between CD34+ cell recovery and viability (r=-0.21, p=.41). Storage duration did not impact CD34+ recovery or viability (r=-0.01, p=.98 and -0.18, p=.47, respectively); or TNC viability (r=-0.13, p=.62). There was, however a significant positive correlation between the storage duration and TNC recovery (r=0.81, p<.0001). Age did not significantly impact TNC or CD34+ recovery (r=-0.05, p=0.86, and r=-0.26, p=0.29, respectively); however there was suggestion of negative impact on viability (r=-0.45, p=0.06 and r=-0.42, p=0.08, respectively, figures 1a and 1b). Overall, there did not appear to be a correlation between the initial TNC count/bag or total CD34+ cell dose on recovery or viability (r=0.29, r=-0.22, r=0.18, r=-0.38, respectively; all p>0.12). However, when patients were stratified according to total collection >25×106 CD34+ cells/kg or ≤25 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, there was better %CD34+ cell count recovery between groups (p = 0.07, median recovery 81% for 13 patients with ≤25 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg and 100% for 5 patients with >25×106 CD34+ cells/kg). For mobilization regimen, there was no significant difference in TNC recovery or viability (p = 0.19 and p=0.76, respectively) or CD34+ viability (p = 0.53), however there was suggestion that CD34+ recovery was greater with G-CSF+VP16 (p=0.06, see figure 2), independent of storage time. Conclusion: Products cryopreserved for 16 years retain acceptable recovery and viability. Unexpectedly, storage duration positively correlated with TNC recovery, and CD34+ cell recovery of >100% was noted in several samples. Reasons for this are unclear, but are likely related to changes in enumeration method or use of methods validated for counting fresh cells. Patient age was suggested to negatively impact post-thaw HPC(A) viability. Our data also suggested that the mobilization regimen or the CD34+ cell collection yield may affect the CD34+ cell recovery, possibly reflecting differences in graft characteristics. The number of patients included is relatively small and these findings warrant further studies for validation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text