Impact of Somatic Gene Mutations on Response to Lenalidomide (LEN) in IPSS Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Patients (Pts) without Del(5q) and Ineligible for or Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs)

Abstract Background: Somatic gene mutations occur in the majority of MDS pts; specific mutations and high mutation frequency have prognostic relevance (Papaemmanuil et al. Blood. 2013;122:3616-27). Evaluation of somatic mutations may support the diagnosis of MDS and guide treatment (Tx) selection. The phase 3 randomized MDS-005 study compared LEN and placebo (PBO) Tx in red blood cell transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) non-del(5q) lower-risk MDS pts ineligible for or refractory to ESAs. Deletions in chromosome 5q are associated with a high response rate to LEN in MDS pts; however, no mutations have been definitively associated with a predictable clinical response to LEN in non-del(5q) MDS. Aim:To investigate the relationship between somatic gene mutations detected by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and response and overall survival (OS) in lower-risk non-del(5q) MDS pts treated with LEN in the MDS-005 study. Methods: Eligible pts were: RBC-TD (≥ 2 units packed RBCs/28 days 112 days immediately prior to randomization) with International Prognostic Scoring System defined Low-/Intermediate-1-risk non-del(5q) MDS; ineligible for ESA Tx (serum erythropoietin > 500 mU/mL); or unresponsive or refractory to ESAs (RBC-TD despite ESA Tx with adequate dose and duration). 239 pts were randomized 2:1 to oral LEN 10 mg once daily (5 mg for pts with creatinine clearance 40-60 mL/min) or PBO. DNA was isolated from bone marrow mononuclear cells or whole blood collected at screening from a subset of pts who gave informed consent for this exploratory biomarker analysis and had adequate tissue for analysis. Targeted NGS of 56 genes was performed at Munich Leukemia Laboratory; average sequencing coverage was 2,000-5,000-foldand the variant allele frequency detection cutoff was 3%. Target regions varied by gene, including all exons to hotspots. For association tests, mutant variants (heterozygous or homozygous) were scored as 1 (mutant) or 0 (wildtype) for gene-level analyses. A Fisher exact test was used to test association of mutation status with response. Median OS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were determined by a non-stratified Cox proportional hazards model. A log-rank test was used to test treatment effect with OS for single gene mutation status. Results: The biomarker cohort included 198 of 239 pts (83%; LEN n = 130, PBO n = 68). At least 1 mutation was detected in 30/56 (54%) genes and 173/198 (87%) pts. The most frequently mutated genes were SF3B1 (59%), TET2 (33%), ASXL1 (23%), and DNMT3A (14%); the most frequent co-mutations were SF3B1/TET2 (23%), SF3B1/DNMT3A (10%), SF3B1/ASXL1 (10%), and TET2/ASXL1 (9%) (Figure). Of 116 pts with SF3B1 mutations, 115 (99%) had ≥ 5% ring sideroblasts. The 56-day RBC transfusion-independence (RBC-TI) response rate was significantly lower in LEN-treated ASXL1 mutant pts vs wildtype pts (10% vs 32%, respectively; P = 0.031). At 168 days, the RBC-TI response rate was still lower in LEN-treated ASXL1 mutant pts vs wildtype pts (7% vs 22%); however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.101). LEN-treated DNMT3A mutant pts had a higher 56-day RBC-TI response rate vs wildtype pts (44% vs 25%); however, this difference did not reach significance (P = 0.133) due to the small sample size. RBC-TI response rate with LEN was similar regardless of total number of mutations per pt. Higher numbers of mutations were significantly associated (P = 0.0005) with worse median OS. Mutation in any of the genes associated with a negative prognosis reported by Bejar et al. (N Engl J Med. 2011;346:2496-506) was also significantly associated (P = 0.0003) with worse median OS.However, OS was not significantly different in LEN- vs PBO-treated pts based on any single gene mutation status. Conclusions: In this group of lower-risk RBC-TD non-del(5q) MDS pts, somatic mutations in genes recurrently mutated in myeloid cancers were detected in 87% of pts. SF3B1 mutations (alone or in combination) were most frequent and not associated with response to LEN. ASXL1 mutant pts had a significantly lower LEN response rate vs wildtype pts, whereas DNMT3A mutant pts had a trend for improved LEN response. Median OS was influenced by mutations, but not significantly modified by LEN. Determining predictive clinical markers for Tx response in non-del(5q) MDS pts remains challenging; nevertheless, there is a significant need to identify pt subsets who may be responsive to LEN Tx. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Santini: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Other: advisory board; Onconova: Other: advisory board; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Other: advisory board. Fenaux:Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Astex, Teva: Research Funding; Celgene, Novartis, Teva: Honoraria. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Platzbecker:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zhong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mavrommatis:Discitis DX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beach:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hoenekopp:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. MacBeth:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Somatic Gene Mutations Serve As Molecular Biomarkers Predictive for Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy (IST) in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1664.1664 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1664-1664 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Mintallah Haider ◽

Najla H. Al Ali ◽

Jeffrey E Lancet ◽

Qing Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Gene Mutations ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Trisomy 8 ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Somatic Gene ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) yields durable hematologic improvement (HI) in a subset of patients (pts) with lower risk MDS. Age, HLA-DR15+, and duration of transfusion dependence are the strongest independent clinical variables predictive for response. We investigated the impact of somatic gene mutations on response to IST in lower risk MDS pts. Methods MDS pts who received ATG +/- CSA were identified at the Moffitt Cancer Center. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) IST response model was calculated for each pt. Next Generation sequencing (NGS) for somatic gene mutations was conducted using DNA extracted from archived BM prior to therapy. All pts underwent mutation analysis by a 49 myeloid gene panel. The library was generated with the ThunderBolt (RainDance Technologies, Billerica, MA) and sequenced on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Alignment and variant calling was performed with NextGene (Soft Genetics, State College, PA). Results Sixty-six pts treated with ATG +/- CSA were identified. Median age was 61 and the majority of pts had IPSS lower risk disease with favorable risk karyotype. Median time to initiation of IST was 1 year. All pts received ATG (60% rabbit (r-ATG); 32% equine (e-ATG)), and CSA was used in 60% of pts. Overall frequency of HI was 42% with a trend favoring e-ATG vs. r-ATG (52% vs. 39%, p=0.09). Erythroid HI was evaluable in 30 pts with 60% responding, neutrophil improvement was evaluable in 15 pts and 39% responded, while platelet improvement was evaluable in 18 pts with 57% responding. Six of 18 (33%) pts with pancytopenia experienced trilineage response. Mean time from ATG to next therapy was 12 mo (median of 7.7 mo). Neither presence of an LGL clone, hypocellular BM or fibrosis, HLA DR15, trisomy 8, nor age influenced response to IST. Pts classified as IPSS-R Very high or high risk were unresponsive (n= 5), whereas 10 of 19 pts (53%) with intermediate risk responded. Poor risk IPSS karyotype was associated with a trend for lower response rate when compared to intermediate and good risk (25% vs. 41% vs. 44%; p=0.6). The response rate based on the NIH IST model was 38% for low response probability category pts and 45% for high probability category (p=0.5). Response rate to IST was higher if administered within 2 years from diagnosis, with an HI rate of 48% vs. 33% when treated after 2 years (p=0.04). Pts who received ATG as first line treatment or after lenalidomide had a trend for higher response rates than those treated after azacitidine (46%,75%, and 25% respectively). Addition of CSA significantly improved HI rate (51% vs. 27% for ATG alone, p=0.02). Transformation to AML occurred in 10 pts, 7% of responders and 24% of non-responders (p=0.08). Median OS was 67.2 mo with no significant difference based on IST response. Among 40 pts evaluated by NGS, 20 (50%) had at least one demonstrable somatic mutation (SM) and 9 pts (22.5%) had two or more SM. SF3B1 was the most common SM detected (n=9, 22.5%), followed by ASXL-1 (n=7, 17.5%), TET-2 (n= 5, 12.5%), and STAG2, EZH-2 and ZRSR2 (2 pts each, 5%), and 1 pt each with IDH-1, KDM6A, SETBP1, RAD2, GNAS or GATA-2. Absence of a SM was associated with a higher response to IST (70% vs. 40%, p=0.16), whereas number of SM (1 vs. 2+) did not influence response. The presence of an SF3B1 mutation was a significantly associated with IST nonresponse (1/9 SF3B1 SM, 11% vs. 21/31 WT, 68%; p=0.01). All pts with SF3B1 SM had ring sideroblasts >15% (RS) by morphology and the corresponding HI rate was 20% among pts with RS vs 50% for those without RS, p=0.09. Median OS in pts with an SF3B1 SM was 111 mo vs. 54 mo in SF3B1 WT (p=0.016). The two pts with EZH-2 and the single pt with WT-1 S achieved HI. Mean duration of response was 12 mo among pts with no SM vs. 9 mo in those harboring a SM (p=0.09). Rate of AML transformation among pts with a SM other than SF3B1 was higher in pts without SM (4/11 pts, 36%vs. 1/20, 5%; p =0.023, with a corresponding reduced median OS (52 mo vs. 96, p=0.24). Conclusions These findings support an improved response rate to ATG when administered in combination with CSA, and early in the disease course. The presence of an SF3B1 mutation adversely influences response to IST, suggesting a non-immunologic pathogenesis in this molecularly defined subset. The presence of non-SF3B1 somatic mutations adversely affects response duration and probability of AML transformation. SM should be considered in selection of IST in lower risk MDS patients. Disclosures Komrokji: Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy. Lancet:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Kalo-Bios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Padron:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of Ofatumumab, a Novel Human CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, as Single Agent Therapy in Rituximab-Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.935.935 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 935-935 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Anton Hagenbeek ◽

Luis Fayad ◽

Vincent Delwail ◽

Jean Francois Rossi ◽

Eric Jacobsen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 935 Introduction: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who are refractory to rituximab-based therapy have a need for new non-cytotoxic treatment options. Ofatumumab targets a unique small-loop epitope on CD20 and elicits rapid and efficient in vitro cell lysis via complement-dependent cytotoxicity, even in rituximab-resistant B cells that express high levels of complement inhibitory proteins. Ofatumumab as single agent showed activity in relapsed/refractory FL, including in some patients previously exposed to rituximab (Hagenbeek et al, Blood 2008). Here we report preliminary results from an international, single-arm trial assessing ofatumumab monotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory FL. Methods: Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years), with Grade 1 or 2 CD20+ FL considered refractory to rituximab alone or in combination with chemotherapy, were enrolled between Sept 2006 and Sept 2008 (N=116). Refractoriness to rituximab (at least 4 doses) was defined as failure to achieve at least a partial response, disease progression during rituximab treatment, or disease progression following a response within 6 months of last treatment with rituximab-containing regimens. Patients received 8 weekly infusions of ofatumumab (Dose 1, 300 mg; Doses 2–8, 500 or 1000 mg); glucocorticoid premedication was required before infusions 1 and 2, and acetaminophen and antihistamine were administered before every infusion. The primary endpoint was objective response (International Working Group criteria) in the 1000 mg dose group over 6 months from the start of treatment, as assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics; 90% of patients received all 8 ofatumumab doses. The median follow-up time on the study was 4.7 months overall and 5.5 months for the 1000 mg group. The overall response rate (ORR) in the 1000 mg group was 10% (95% CI: 4, 17%), including 1 complete response. Stable disease was observed in 50% of patients. In the 1000 mg group, the median duration of response was 6.0 months (95% CI: 2.8, upper limit not estimable) and median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.9, 9.1). The ORR in the total population was 11% (95% CI: 5, 17%). Among patients who were refractory to prior rituximab monotherapy (n=27), the ORR was 22% (95% CI: 7, 38%). The ORR among patients who were refractory to rituximab maintenance therapy (n=44) and rituximab combined with chemotherapy (n=45) was 9% (95% CI: 1, 18%) and 7% (95% CI: 0, 14%), respectively. During treatment and up to 30 days following the last dose, the most common AEs (>10% of patients) included rash (15%), urticaria (14%), fatigue (14%), pruritis (13%), nausea (12%), pyrexia (11%) and cough (11%); grade 3–4 infusion-related reactions occurred in only 3 patients (all grade 3 events), none of which were considered serious events; grade 3–4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia in 5% of patients, anemia in 3% and thrombocytopenia in 1%; grade 3 infections (sepsis, febrile neutropenia) occurred in 2 patients. Conclusions: The majority of patients with rituximab-refractory FL in this study were heavily pretreated, were also refractory to chemotherapy and had high-risk FLIPI scores. Although response rates were low with single-agent ofatumumab in patients refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy, a higher response rate was observed in patients who were refractory to rituximab monotherapy, indicating activity despite being refractory to single-agent rituximab. Ofatumumab was well tolerated in this heavily-pretreated population. Infusion reactions were manageable and no unexpected toxicities were observed. Further investigations with ofatumumab are warranted, including in combination with other therapies in patients with FL. Disclosures: Hagenbeek: Roche, Bayer Schering Pharma, Genmab: Advisory roles. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an investigational anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma) as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis).. Fayad:GlaxoSmithKline, Genmab: Research Funding. Rossi:GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator on trial funded by GSK. Kuliczkowski:GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator on trial funded by GSK. Link:Genentech: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Radford:GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership. Hellmann:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gupta:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Arning:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Begtrup:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schultz:Genmab: Employment. Bang:Genmab: Employment. Russell:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Czuczman:GlaxoSmithKline: Advisory Board, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Advisory Board, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Mitapivat (AG-348), a Pyruvate Kinase Activator, in Patients with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency: The DRIVE PK Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123406 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3512-3512

Author(s):

Rachael F. Grace ◽

D. Mark Layton ◽

Frédéric Galactéros ◽

Wilma Barcellini ◽

Eduard J. van Beers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

The Core ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Extension Period

Background: Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is a congenital hemolytic anemia caused by mutations in the PKLR gene, leading to a deficiency of the glycolytic enzyme red cell PK (PK-R). Current treatments for PK deficiency are supportive only. Mitapivat (AG-348) is an oral, small-molecule, allosteric PK-R activator in clinical trials for PK deficiency. We previously described results from DRIVE PK, a phase 2, randomized, open-label, dose-ranging study in adults with PK deficiency (N=52) treated with mitapivat for a median of 6 months. Aim: To report long-term safety and efficacy of mitapivat in patients who continue treatment in the ongoing Extension period of the DRIVE PK study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02476916). Methods: Patients were eligible to participate if ≥18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of PK deficiency (enzyme and molecular testing); baseline hemoglobin (Hb) levels ≤12.0 g/dL (males) or ≤11.0 g/dL (females); and if they had not received more than 3 units of red blood cells in the prior 12 months, with no transfusions in the prior 4 months. Patients were initially randomized 1:1 to receive mitapivat 50 mg twice daily (BID) or 300 mg BID for a 6-month Core period. Dose adjustment was allowed during the Core period based on safety and efficacy. Patients experiencing clinical benefit without concerning safety issues related to mitapivat (investigator discretion) could opt to enter the Extension period, with follow-up visits every 3 months. Safety (adverse events [AEs]) and efficacy (hematologic parameters including Hb) were assessed. Protocol amendments during the Extension period required that (1) patients who did not have an increase from baseline Hb of ≥1.0 g/dL for ≥3 of the prior 4 measurements withdraw from the study, and (2) patients treated with mitapivat doses >25 mg BID undergo a dose taper and continue on the dose that maintained their Hb level no lower than 1.0 g/dL below their pre-taper Hb level. Results: Fifty-two patients enrolled in this study and were treated in the 24-week Core period; 43 (83%) patients completed the Core period and 36 (69%) entered the Extension period. Eighteen patients discontinued from the Extension period: investigator decision (n=8), AEs (n=1), consent withdrawal (n=1), noncompliance (n=1), or other (n=7). Thus, 18 patients, all of whom received ≥29 months of treatment with mitapivat (median 35.6, range 28.7-41.9) have continued treatment. Ten of these 18 patients were male, 11 had a prior splenectomy, and 5 had a history of iron chelation. Median age was 33.5 (range 19-61) years; mean baseline Hb was 9.7 (range 7.9-12.0) g/dL. All patients had ≥1 missense PKLR mutation. The doses (post-taper) at which treatment was continued were (BID): ≤25 mg (n=12), 50 mg (n=5), and 200 mg (n=1). Improvements in Hb levels and markers of hemolysis (reticulocytes, indirect bilirubin, haptoglobin) were sustained (Figure). Among the 18 patients, headache was the most commonly reported AE during both the Extension (n=7, 38.9%) and Core (n=10, 55.6%) periods. Reports of insomnia and fatigue during the Extension period (n=5, 27.8% each) were the same as or similar to those during the Core period. There were fewer reports of nausea (2 vs 6) and hot flush (0 vs 5) in the Extension period. Nasopharyngitis was reported in 5 patients in the Extension period vs 1 patient in the Core period. These data are consistent with the AE profile for the 52 patients treated overall in the Core period, in that headache (44%), insomnia (40%), and nausea (38%) were the most commonly reported AEs and were transient (generally resolved within 7 days without intervention). Conclusion: Chronic daily dosing with mitapivat for a median of 3 years was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. Increased Hb levels and improvements in hemolysis markers were sustained at the optimized individual doses. These long-term data support the potential of mitapivat as the first disease-altering therapy for PK deficiency. Two phase 3 trials are underway to further study the effect of mitapivat in patients with PK deficiency. Disclosures Grace: Novartis: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Layton:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cerus Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Galactéros:Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barcellini:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board; Agios: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board. van Beers:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; RR Mechatronics: Research Funding. Ravindranath:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: I am site PI on several Agios-sponsored studies, Research Funding. Kuo:Agios: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Sheth:Apopharma: Other: Clinical trial DSMB; CRSPR/Vertex: Other: Clinical Trial Steering committee; Celgene: Consultancy. Kwiatkowski:bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Apopharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Terumo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Imara: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Hua:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hawkins:Bristol Myers Squibb: Equity Ownership; Infinity Pharma: Equity Ownership; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership. Mix:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Glader:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Northstar-2: Updated Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Lentiglobin Gene Therapy in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia and Non-β0/β0 Genotypes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126046 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3543-3543 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alexis A. Thompson ◽

Mark C. Walters ◽

Janet L. Kwiatkowski ◽

Suradej Hongeng ◽

John B. Porter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Therapy ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) is treated with regular, lifelong red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and despite iron-chelating therapy, carries a risk of serious organ damage from iron overload and other complications. Transplantation with autologous CD34+ cells encoding a βA-T87Q-globin gene (LentiGlobin for β-thalassemia) is being evaluated in patients with TDT. Interim results are presented here from the ongoing, international, single-arm, phase 3 Northstar-2 study (HGB-207; NCT02906202) of LentiGlobin gene therapy in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with TDT (defined by receiving ≥100 mL/kg/yr of RBCs or ≥8 RBC transfusions/yr) and non-β0/β0 genotypes. Methods Patients undergo hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor. Following apheresis, CD34+ cells are transduced with BB305 lentiviral vector and infused into patients after pharmacokinetic-adjusted, single-agent busulfan myeloablation. The primary efficacy endpoint is transfusion independence (TI; weighted average hemoglobin [Hb] ≥9 g/dL without RBC transfusions for ≥12 months). HSC engraftment, βA-T87Q-globin expression, Hb levels, detection of replication competent lentivirus (RCL), and adverse events (AE) are also assessed. Patients are followed for 2 years and offered participation in a long-term follow-up study. Summary statistics are presented as median (min - max). Results Twenty patients were treated in Northstar-2 as of 13 December 2018 and have been followed for a median of 8.1 (0.5 - 22.2) months. At enrollment, median age was 16 (8 - 34) years; 5 patients were <12 years of age. Median drug product cell dose was 8.0 (5.0 - 19.9) x106 cells/kg and vector copy number was 3.2 (1.9 - 5.6) copies/diploid genome. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in the 18/20 and 15/20 evaluable patients was 22.5 (13 - 32) and 45 (20 - 84) days, respectively. Non-hematologic grade ≥3 AEs in ≥3 patients after LentiGlobin infusion included stomatitis (n=12), febrile neutropenia (n=6), pyrexia (n=4), epistaxis (n=3), and veno-occlusive liver disease (n=3). One serious AE of grade 3 thrombocytopenia was considered possibly related to LentiGlobin. No patient died, had graft failure, or had detection of RCL. No insertional oncogenesis has been observed. Gene therapy-derived HbAT87Q stabilized approximately 6 months after infusion. In adolescent and adult patients treated with LentiGlobin, median HbAT87Q at Months 6, 12 and 18 was 9.5 (n=11), 9.2 (n=8), and 9.5 (n=3) g/dL, respectively. The median total Hb without transfusions at Months 6, 12, and 18 were 11.9 (n=11), 12.4 (n=8), 12.3 (n=2) g/dL, respectively. At Month 6, 91% (10/11) of patients had total Hb of >11 g/dL without transfusions. Five adolescent and adult patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint of transfusion independence, 4 (80%) of whom achieved TI. The median weighted average Hb during TI was 12.4 (11.5 - 12.6) g/dL which compared favorably to pre-transfusion nadir Hb levels before enrollment (median 9.1 g/dL [7.5 - 10.0 g/dL]). At time of analysis, the median duration of TI was 13.6 (12.0 - 18.2) months. One patient who did not achieve TI stopped transfusions for 11.4 months but resumed transfusions due to recurrent anemia. This patient had a 71.4% reduction in RBC transfusion volume from Month 6 to Month 18 compared to baseline. Marrow cellularity and myeloid:erythroid (M:E) ratios were evaluated in 8 adolescent and adult patients with ≥12 months follow-up to assess the effect of LentiGlobin treatment on dyserythropoiesis. Seven of 8 patients had improved marrow M:E ratios at Month 12 (0.63 - 1.90) compared with baseline (0.14 - 0.48). In patients who stopped transfusions, soluble transferrin receptor levels were reduced by a median of 72% (58% - 78%) at Month 12 (n=6). Updated outcomes in adolescents and adults and outcomes in pediatric patients will be reported. Summary In this update of the Northstar-2 study of LentiGlobin gene therapy in patients with TDT and non-β0/β0 genotypes, transfusion independence was observed in 4/5 evaluable adolescent and adults and 10/11 treated patients had total Hb of >11 g/dL without transfusion support 6 months after LentiGlobin infusion. HbAT87Q stabilized approximately 6 months after treatment and patients who stopped RBC transfusions had improved erythropoiesis. A safety profile consistent with busulfan conditioning was observed after LentiGlobin gene therapy. Disclosures Thompson: bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding. Walters:TruCode: Consultancy; AllCells, Inc: Consultancy; Editas Medicine: Consultancy. Kwiatkowski:bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Terumo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Imara: Consultancy; Apopharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Porter:Protagonism: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; La Jolla: Honoraria; Vifor: Honoraria; Silence therapeutics: Honoraria. Thrasher:Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orchard Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generation Bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 4BIOCapital: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thuret:BlueBird bio: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Celgene: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Novartis: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Apopharma: Consultancy. Elliot:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tao:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Colvin:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1951.1951 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1951-1951 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Subset Analysis of Response to Treatment of Chronic Phase CML in a Phase 1 Study of Ponatinib in Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.602.602 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 602-602 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Neil Shah ◽

Dale Bixby ◽

Michael J. Mauro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 602 Background: Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Initial findings of a phase 1 trial in patients (pts) with refractory hematologic malignancies have been reported. The effect of duration of treatment, prior treatment, and mutation status on response to treatment was examined in CML chronic phase (CP) pts who responded to ponatinib. Methods: An open-label, dose escalation, phase 1 trial of ponatinib in pts with hematologic malignancies is ongoing. The primary aim is to assess the safety; anti-leukemic activity is also being investigated. Pts resistant to prior treatments or who had no standard treatment available were enrolled to receive a single daily oral dose of ponatinib (2 mg to 60 mg). Subset analyses of factors impacting cytogenetic and molecular response endpoints (MCyR and MMR) were performed for pts with CP-CML. Data are presented through April 15, 2011. Results: In total, 81 pts (54% male) received ponatinib. Overall, 43 pts had CP with 34 ongoing at analysis. MCyR was observed as best response in 31/43 (72%), 27 (63%) CCyR. The median time to MCyR was 12 (3 to 104) wks. Response rates were assessed by duration of treatment (1 pt in CCyR at entry was excluded; 6 pts in PCyR had to achieve CCyR). At the 3 month assessment, 22/42 (52%) CP pts achieved MCyR; at 6 months, 24/42 (57%); at 12 months, 29/42 (69%) had MCyR. The impact of prior treatment on response and time to response was assessed. 42 pts (98%) had >2 prior TKIs and 28 (65%) ≥3 prior TKIs, including investigational agents. Of approved TKIs, all pts were previously treated with imatinib, 19 dasatinib or nilotinib after imatinib, and 21 both dasatinib and nilotinib after imatinib. MCyR rate decreased with number of prior TKIs (2 prior TKIs 13/14 [93%], ≥3 prior TKIs 17/28 [61%]) and number of approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 17/19 [90%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 12/21 [57%]). Time to response was prolonged in pts more heavily treated with prior TKIs. Median time to MCyR increased with the number of prior TKIs and approved TKIs (2 TKIs 12 wks, ≥3 TKIs 32 wks). The effect of mutation status on response and time to response was also evaluated. At entry, 12 pts had the T315I mutation, 15 had other BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, 12 had no mutations detected, 4 did not allow sequencing. MCyR response rate for CP pts with T315I was 11/12 (92%); for other mutations, 10/15 (67%); and no mutation, 7/12 (58%). Similarly, mutation status had an impact on time to response: median time to MCyR was 12 wks for those with T315I or other mutations and 32 wks in resistant pts with no mutation. All CP patients were evaluable for MMR. At analysis, MMR was 17/43 (40%). MMR rate was inversely related to number of prior TKIs (2 TKIs 10/14 [71%], ≥3 TKIs 6/28 [21%]), approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 12/19 [63%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 4/21 [19%]), and was higher for T315I pts (7/12, 58%) and those with other mutations (7/15, 47%) compared with no mutation (2/12, 17%). Median time to MMR for CP pts was 97 wks; median time to MMR was shorter for pts who were less heavily treated (2 prior TKIs 24 wks) and those with T315I or other mutations (63 wks). Conclusion: In this subset analysis of the phase 1 data, ponatinib had substantial activity in all subgroups analyzed. Time on treatment, less prior therapy and kinase domain mutations were associated with higher response rates and early responses in CP pts. Cytogenetic responses improved over the first 12 months of treatment and were higher in less heavily treated pts. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Shah:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bixby:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:ARIAD: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD: Research Funding. Hu:ARIAD: Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Druker:MolecularMD: OHSU and Dr. Druker have a financial interest in MolecularMD. Technology used in this research has been licensed to MolecularMD. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU Conflict of Interest in Research Committee and t. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide (POM) with Low-Dose Dexamethasone (LoDEX) in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Outcomes Based on Prior Treatment Exposure

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4070.4070 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4070-4070 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ravi Vij ◽

Craig C. Hofmeister ◽

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

David S. Siegel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Prior Exposure ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4070 Background: There are currently limited effective treatment options for patients (pts) with RRMM with prior exposure to lenalidomide (LEN), bortezomib (BORT) and chemotherapy. In a multicenter, randomized phase 2 study, POM with or without LoDEX (n=221) was active in RRMM pts who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including LEN and BORT (Richardson PG, et al. Blood 2011;118:abs 634); activity was also observed in those with disease refractory to LEN, BORT, or both (Vij R, et al. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:abs 8016). Here we characterize outcomes in the POM+LoDEX group (n=113) according to the prior treatment exposure. Methods: Pts with RRMM who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including LEN and BORT, and had progressive disease (PD) within 60 days of their last treatment were randomized (1:1 ratio) to POM+LoDEX (POM, 4 mg/day for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle; LoDex, 40 mg/week) or POM alone. At randomization, pts were stratified by age, prior number of treatments, and prior thalidomide exposure. At progression, pts receiving POM alone could receive POM+LoDEX at investigator's discretion. All pts received thromboprophylaxis (daily low-dose aspirin). The endpoints in this study were progression-free survival (PFS), response rates (using European Bone Marrow Transplantation [EBMT] criteria), duration of response, time to response, overall survival (OS), and safety. Response data according to prior therapy were assessed by investigator assessment. Results: All 113 pts assigned to POM+LoDEX had prior exposure to LEN (100%), BORT (100%), and steroids (100%). Most pts had also received prior alkylator therapy (93%), stem cell transplant (SCT) (73%), and thalidomide (THAL) (68%); 49% had received prior anthracyclines. Regimens immediately prior to study entry included BORT (50%), LEN (39%), cyclophosphamide (13%), THAL (8%), vorinostat (8%), carfilzomib (5%), and melphalan (5%). The median number of exposures to LEN and BORT in prior lines was once (range 1–4) and twice (range 1–6), respectively. The majority of pts (80%) had received >3 prior therapies. The overall response rate (ORR) was 48% and 30% in pts who had received ≤3 and >3 prior therapies, respectively. Of the pts who had ≤3 vs > 3 prior therapies, 9% vs 1% pts achieved complete response (CR), 39% vs 29% pts achieved partial response (PR), 9% vs 12% pts achieved minimal response (MR) and 44% vs 36 % pts achieved stable disease (SD), respectively. ORR was 34% and appeared similar regardless of prior exposure to alkylators (33%), anthracyclines (35%), SCT (35%), or THAL (35%). Median duration of response was also similar in pts who had received prior alkylators (8.4 mos), anthracyclines (10.1 mos), SCT (7.7 mos), and THAL (7.7 mos). Of the 69 pts who had a best response of SD or PD to their last prior antimyeloma therapy, 21 pts (12 SD and 9 PD) achieved a PR and 3 pts (1 SD and 2 PD) achieved a CR with POM+LoDEX treatment. Responding pts had longer time to progression (TTP; 11.1 mos) with POM+LoDex compared with the TTP (4.4 mos) observed with their last antimyeloma regimen prior to study. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events in the POM+LoDEX group were neutropenia (41%), anemia (22%), pneumonia (22%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and fatigue (14%). The incidence of at least 1 grade 3–4 adverse event was 100% in pts with ≤ 3 prior therapies, and 88% in pts with >3 therapies. Conclusions: The combination of POM+LoDEX has demonstrated an ORR of 34% in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM who have been previously exposed to LEN, BORT, steroids, and other treatments. Early treatment of POM+LoDEX (≤3 prior therapies) achieved better ORR (48%) compared with pts who received POM+LoDex later (>3 prior therapies; ORR, 30%). Disclosures: Vij: Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is an investigational drug and is not approved for the treatment of patients with any condition. Hofmeister:Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria. Richardson:Celgene, Millennium, Johnson & Johnson: Advisory Board Other. Jagannath:Onyx Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Onyx: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharma: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baz:Celgene, Millennium, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Research Funding. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Larkins:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.801.801 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 801-801 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Francisco Cervantes ◽

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Dietger Niederwieser ◽

Andres Sirulnik ◽

Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Extension Phase ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

The Safety and Activity of BMS-906024, a Gamma Secretase Inhibitor (GSI) with Anti-Notch Activity, in Patients with Relapsed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL): Initial Results of a Phase 1 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.968.968 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 968-968 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Patrick A. Zweidler-McKay ◽

Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽

Dan Douer ◽

Hervé Dombret ◽

Oliver G. Ottmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Response Data ◽

Notch Receptors ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Count Recovery

Abstract Background: Activating mutations in Notch receptors are found in multiple hematopoietic malignancies, including > 50% of patients with T-ALL, making it the most common genetic abnormality in this disease. GSIs block activation of Notch receptors and limit growth and survival in pre-clinical T-ALL models. However, various GSIs evaluated in clinical trials have had on target toxicities and have not been reported to show significant responses. CA216002 is a multicenter phase 1 trial designed to assess the safety of a novel intravenous GSI BMS-906024 in patients with relapsed or refractory T-ALL and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL). We are presenting the initial toxicity profile and response data on this trial. Methods: Adults with relapsed/refractory T-ALL or T-LL were enrolled and received BMS-906024 intravenously weekly at doses of 0.6 mg, 4 mg, and 6 mg. Due to the rapid progression of T-ALL in many cases, administration of glucocorticoids or other agents was permitted and dosing guidelines for dexamethasone were provided in the protocol. Results: As of July 2, 2014, safety and response data are available on 25 patients (age 18-74 yrs) with relapsed/refractory T-ALL/T-LL that received at least one dose of BMS-906024, at doses of 0.6 mg (n=1), 4 mg (n=10), and 6 mg (n=14). Seven patients did not complete the first 4-week cycle due to rapid disease progression or disease-related death (n=5), infusion reaction (n=1), or an unrelated adverse event (n=1). Safety: The drug-related grade 3-5 adverse events included grade 4 events of anemia, hypophosphatemia, and thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 events of diarrhea, febrile bone marrow aplasia, hepatotoxicity, hypophosphatemia, pancytopenia, and tumor lysis syndrome (n=1 each). Drug-related diarrhea was common (n=11, 44%), consistent with expectations for Notch inhibition, but was generally grade 1-2 with only one grade 3 event. One dose-limiting toxicity involving grade 3 elevations of ALT and AST without bilirubin elevation (reported as grade 3 hepatotoxicity) occurred at the 4 mg dose level. One death not related to disease progression occurred, due to GI and post-surgical hemorrhage associated with pancytopenia; hemorrhage was considered not related, but pancytopenia was considered related to study drug. Responses: Eight patients (32%; 4 at 4 mg and 4 at 6 mg) had at least 50% reduction in bone marrow (BM) blasts, including one formal CR and one PR (both at 6 mg), and three of these eight had 98-100% clearance of BM blasts. (One patient, marked “*” below, began the study with 0.1% BM blasts and is not included in the eight.) The patient who achieved a CR began the study with 85% BM blasts and an absolute peripheral blood (PB) blast count of 38 k/mcL. By the end of the first cycle the BM and PB were cleared of blasts, and by the end of the second cycle there was count recovery. This patient received dexamethasone during the first cycle only, and left the study after 3 cycles in CR for an allogeneic transplant. The patient who achieved a PR began with 32% BM blasts, and by the end of the first cycle the BM blasts had decreased to 7% with improvement in ANC. The additional six patients with 50-100% decreases in BM blasts had residual lymphadenopathy, had incomplete count recovery or failed to meet other criteria which prevented them from being considered CR or PR based on the protocol definitions. One of these six patients also received hydroxyurea beginning on study day 16. Biomarkers: The figure shows change in BM blasts in 12 patients with paired BM assessments and Notch mutation status available. BM responses occurred in both Notch mutant and wildtype patients. Conclusions: Overall 8 of the 25 patients (32%) showed at least 50% reduction in BM blasts including one CR and one PR. Although the contribution of concurrent glucocorticoid therapy to the improvement in some patients is not clearly defined, the multiple responses on this trial suggest anti-leukemia activity of BMS-906024. This represents the first Notch targeting trial leading to multiple responses in relapsed/refractory T-ALL. BMS-906024 was relatively well tolerated, with minimal diarrhea in this population. The weekly dosing of this long-acting GSI shows promise for targeting Notch in T-ALL. Pharmacokinetic and additional biomarker data will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Maximum Percent Reduction from Baseline of BM Blasts in Patients with Paired BM Assessments and Known Mutation Status Disclosures Zweidler-McKay: BMS: Research Funding. Off Label Use: BMS-906024 is in early Phase I clinical trials, and does not yet have an FDA-approved indication.. Douer:BMS: Research Funding. Ottmann:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Vey:BMS: Honoraria. Thomas:BMS: Research Funding. Zhu:BMS: Employment. Huang:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bajaj:BMS: Employment. Fischer:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Defining the Incidence and Clinical Impact of Genomic Alterations Across Different Histologic Types of Lymphoma Using a Clinically Validated Comprehensive Targeted Sequencing Assay

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2668.2668 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2668-2668

Author(s):

Connie Batlevi ◽

Franck Rapaport ◽

Andrew M. Intlekofer ◽

Anne Reiner ◽

Craig H Moskowitz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Clinical Relevance ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Genomic Sequencing ◽

Genomic Alterations ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Lymphoma is a clinically and molecularly heterogenous disease. Next generation sequencing of primary lymphoma samples has identified common recurring genomic alterations (GAs). The distribution and frequency of recurring GAs across lymphoma subtypes remains unknown because prior studies vary in sequencing methods, depth of coverage, and specimen source. In this study, we benchmark the distribution of GAs across different lymphoma subtypes by prospectively analyzing lymphoma cases and performing comprehensive DNA/RNA targeted sequencing of genes commonly found in hematologic malignancies using the Foundation One Heme (F1H) clinical assay. Methods: After obtaining proper consent, archived specimens from 183 samples [formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) N=141, peripheral blood N=28, BM aspirate N=14] distributed across lymphoma subtypes (including 62 DLBCL, 38 T cell lymphoma, 32 FL, 17 CLL, 13 MCL) were sequenced to high, uniform coverage averaging >600x for DNA, >20 million pairs for RNA. GAs were determined, including base substitutions, small insertions and deletions, rearrangements, and copy number alterations. Significant non-synonymous variants were identified as mutations from the COSMIC database, amplifications of established oncogenes, or homozygous deletions and/or clear loss-of-function mutations of known tumor suppressors. Fisher's exact test with Monte Carlo estimation corrected by false discovery rate was used for associations. Results: Samples from prospectively consented patients were banked for a median of 30 days prior to genomic analysis, range 1 day to 6.5 yr. Sequencing data was reported a median of 16 days from sample date receipt. GAs were identified in 95% of samples, with a median of 4 GAs/sample. The most common GAs were TP53 (29%), MLL2 (27%), BCL2 (25%), CDKN2A/B (17%) and CREBBP (14%). Alterations of chromatic modifiers (80%), BCR/NFkB components (51%), and cell cycle pathway (44%) were most common. In our group of unpaired follicular lymphoma samples (N=7 treatment naïve, N=25 treatment exposed), the number of GAs increased with treatment exposure. We found similar gene and biological signatures regardless of prior therapy; however differences emerge in genes of potential clinical relevance. Sequencing profiles augmented or altered the pathologic diagnosis in 11 of 183 (6%) of the cases. Importantly we were able to classify the GAs as actionable, potentially actionable and variants of unclear significance to better define the clinical relevance of targeted genomic sequencing. Conclusions: Integration of comprehensive next generation targeted genomic sequencing and clinical analysis in lymphoma provides an opportunity to describe the spectrum and incidence of GAs across different lymphoma subtypes and provide guidance on application of genomic profiling. This work serves to benchmark GAs across all lymphoma subtypes in a clinically relevant population and enables design of basket trials selecting patients based on shared genomic and biologic similarity instead of lymphoma subtype. To our knowledge, this is the largest repository of clinically annotated genomic sequencing in lymphoma. Table 1. Total Specimens N = 183 Median Age at Diagnosis 57 Range 21 - 84 Median Age at Biopsy 61 Range 21 - 91 Sex • Male • Female 113 70 62% 38% Biospecimen source • Paraffin embedded • Peripheral blood • Marrow aspirate 141 28 14 77% 15% 8% Patient consent • Prospective consent • Retrospective consent 145 38 79% 21% Prospectively consented patients (N=145) Median Days to Result Median Age of Sample 16 30 days 8 - 81 1 day - 6.5 yr Disclosures Palomba: Janssen: Consultancy. Gerecitano:Genentech: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board. Matasar:Spectrum: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Straus:Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. He:Foundation Medicine, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Balasubramanian:Foundation Medicine: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stephens:Foundation Medicine, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miller:Foundation Medicine: Employment. Levine:Loxo Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy. Younes:Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Bristol Meyer Squibb: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda Millenium: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.

Download Full-text