Improving Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) Pre-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Does Not Translate into Better Post-Transplant Outcomes for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Abstract Background: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) encompass a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by dysplastic and ineffective blood cell production leading to cytopenia and a variable risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. The natural history of patients (pts) with MDS is variable and several prognostic scoring systems have been developed to guide treatment decisions. The revised IPSS (IPSS-R) score is commonly used in practice to predict outcome in newly diagnosed pts as well as in predicting their transplant outcomes. It remains unclear however whether improving IPSS-R pre allogeneic transplant (allo-SCT), using different therapeutic strategies, is associated with better clinical outcomes post-transplant. Methods: The Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia database was queried to identify all pts with MDS who had undergone an allo-SCT between Feb 1997 and April 2013. Pertinent information on clinical features and outcomes were then retrospectively reviewed. IPSS-R was calculated at MDS diagnosis (dx) and then re calculated prior to transplant. Outcomes of pts who had improvement in IPSS-R were then compared to those with no improvement or worsened IPSS-R score. Overall survival (OS) and Event free survival (EFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a competing risk analysis was used to calculate relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Log-Rank test was used to determine the p value. Results: We identified 138 pts who have undergone allo-SCT with the following characteristics: median age at transplant was 49 years (yrs) (range 17-66); 76 (55%) were male; 121 pts (88%) underwent myeloablative (MA) conditioning, 68 (49%) related donor and 70 (51%) unrelated donors out of which 43 (61%) were matched and 27 (39%) were mismatched. The source of stem cells were: peripheral blood n=101 (73%), bone marrow n=35 (25%) and cord blood n=2 (1%). The median interval from dx to transplant was 128 days. The median follow up (FU) of live pts was 7.3 yrs (range 1.5-17.4). Acute graft vs. host disease (aGVHD) grade 2 or higher was present in 74 (54%), chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD) was present in 94 (68%). During the time of FU 83 (60%) of pts had died. Relapse occurred in 41 (30%). Causes of death were: relapse n=39; GVHD n=20; regimen related n=11; infection n=5 and other causes, n=9. Baseline characteristics of all pts are shown in table 1. In 12 (9%) pts, the IPSS-R could not be calculated either because cytogenetics failed or bone marrow biopsy pre transplant was not done. At the time of transplant 85 (62%) pts had blasts <5%, 38 (28%) had 5-20% and 10 (7%) had blasts >20% and blasts count was unknown in 5 pts. IPSS-R improved in 62 (45%), worsened in 23 (17%), no change 41 (30%) and unknown in 12 (9%). Type of treatment was chemotherapy in 55 (40%), best supportive care in 80 (58%) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in 3 (2%). The OS and EFS for all pts were 34% and 33%, respectively. There was no difference in outcome between pts who have undergone MA vs non-MA, OS 34% and 39% (p=0.63) and EFS 34% and 32% (p=0.86), respectively. OS was not statistically different between pts with improved IPSS-R vs worsened vs unchanged, 30% vs 22% vs 40%, p= 0.63 (see figure 1). EFS was 30% vs 21% vs 40%, p=0.53, respectively. Relapse was 36% vs 53% vs 31%, p=0.35 and non-relapse mortality was 54% vs 57% vs 42%, p=0.75, respectively. There was no difference in OS and EFS between pts treated with chemotherapy vs supportive care with OS of 40% vs 41%, p=0.63 and EFS of 33% vs 32%, p=0.46, respectively. OS and EFS for grade 2 or higher aGVHD were 34% vs 32%, p=0.13 and 32% vs 32%, p=0.22, respectively. Figure 2 shows OS for Pts with blast <5% vs 5-20% vs >20% at transplant. Relapse of pts with blasts <5 vs 5-20 vs >20 at the time of transplant was 23% vs 69% vs 66%, p=0.0004, respectively. On multivariate analysis, only three factors were associated with worse OS and EFS which were: cytogenetics at dx, blast count at transplant and absence of cGVHD. Conclusion: Improving IPSS-R before allogeneic transplant does not translate into better clinical outcome. The IPSS-R cytogenetic risk group at the time of diagnosis and blast count at transplant are highly predictive of post-transplant outcomes. Patient characteristics Patient characteristics Disclosures Gerrie: Roche Canada: Research Funding. Toze:Roche Canada: Research Funding. Song:Janssen: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Song:Janssen: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nevill:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Association of MHC Class I Chain-Related Gene a (MICA) Polymorphisms with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112745 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2075-2075

Author(s):

Sagar S. Patel ◽

Betty K. Hamilton ◽

Lisa Rybicki ◽

Dawn Thomas ◽

Arden Emrick ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Binding Affinity ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Transplant Outcomes ◽

Nkg2d Receptor

Abstract Background MHC class I chain-related gene A (MICA) is a polymorphic ligand of the natural killer (NKG2D) receptor on immune effector cells. The activating NKG2D receptor controls immune responses by regulating NK cells, NKT cells and γδ-T cells. Dimorphisms at sequence position 129 of the MICA gene confers varying levels of binding affinity to NKG2D receptor. MICA previously has been associated with post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) outcomes including graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), infection, and relapse. However, it is unclear how MICA interacts with cytogenetic and somatic mutations in regards to these outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of adult AML patients in first or second complete remission (CR1, CR2), who underwent T-cell replete matched related or unrelated donor alloHCT. Analysis was limited to those who had MICA data available for donors and recipients. In addition to cytogenetic risk group stratification by European LeukemiaNet criteria (Döhner H, et al, Blood 2016), a subset of patients had a 36-gene somatic mutation panel assessed prior to alloHCT by next-generation sequencing. Dimorphisms at the MICA-129 position have previously been categorized as weaker (valine/valine: V/V), heterozygous (methionine/valine: M/V), or stronger (methionine/methionine: M/M) receptor binding affinity. Fine and Gray or Cox regression was used to identify the association of MICA and outcomes with results as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results From 2000 - 2017, 131 AML patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Median age at transplant was 54 years (18-74), with 98% Caucasian. Disease status at transplant included 78% CR1 and 22% CR2. Cytogenetic risk stratification showed 13% of patients as favorable, 56% as intermediate, and 31% as adverse-risk. The five most common somatic mutations were FLT3 (15%), NPM1 (14%), DNMT3A (11%), TET2 (7%), and NRAS (6%). 60% of patients had a related donor. A myeloablative transplant was performed in 84% of patients and 53% had a bone marrow graft source. The most common conditioning regimen used was busulfan/cyclophosphamide (52%). 12% of patients were MICA mismatched with their donor. The distribution of donor MICA-129 polymorphisms were 41% V/V, 53% M/V, and 6% M/M. In univariable analysis, donor-recipient MICA mismatch tended to be associated with a lower risk of infection (HR 0.49, CI 0.23-1.02, P=0.06) and grade 2-4 acute GvHD (HR 0.25, CI 0.06-1.04, P=0.06) but was not associated with other post-transplant outcomes. In multivariable analysis, donor MICA-129 V/V was associated with a higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.02, CI 1.01-4.05, P=0.047) (Figure 1) along with increasing patient age at transplant (HR 1.46, CI 1.10-1.93, p=0.008) and the presence of a TET2 mutation (HR 6.00, CI 1.77-20.3, P=0.004). There were no differences between the V/V and the M/V+M/M cohorts regarding somatic mutational status, cytogenetics and other pre-transplant characteristics and post-transplant outcomes. With a median follow-up of 65 months for both cohorts, 45% vs. 49% of patients remain alive, respectively. The most common causes of death between the V/V and the M/V+M/M cohorts was relapse (38% vs. 62%) and infection (31% vs. 8%), respectively. Conclusion While previous studies have demonstrated associations of somatic mutations and cytogenetics with survival outcomes after alloHCT for AML, we observed mutations in TET2 and the V/V donor MICA-129 polymorphism to be independently prognostic for NRM. Mechanistic studies may be considered to assess for possible interactions of TET2 mutations with NK cell alloreactivity. The weaker binding affinity to the NKG2D receptor by the V/V phenotype may diminish immune responses against pathogens that subsequently contribute to higher NRM. These observations may have implications for enhancing patient risk stratification prior to transplant and optimizing donor selection. Future investigation with larger cohorts interrogating pre-transplant AML somatic mutations with MICA polymorphisms on post-transplant outcomes may further elucidate which subsets of patients may benefit most from transplant. Disclosures Nazha: MEI: Consultancy. Mukherjee:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria; BioPharm Communications: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squib: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEK Consulting: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aplastic Anemia & MDS International Foundation in Joint Partnership with Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute: Honoraria. Advani:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Carraway:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Balaxa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; FibroGen: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gerds:Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Majhail:Incyte: Honoraria; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Atara: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Increased Early Mortality after Fludarabine and Melphalan Conditioning with Peripheral Blood Grafts in Haploidentical SCT with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129872 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4496-4496 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Luke Eastburg ◽

David A. Russler-Germain ◽

Ramzi Abboud ◽

Peter Westervelt ◽

John F. DiPersio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Early Mortality ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Equity Ownership

The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the context of haploidentical stem cell transplant (haplo-SCT) has led to drastically reduced rates of Graft-vs-Host (GvH) disease through selective depletion of highly allo-reactive donor T-cells. Early trials utilized a reduced-intensity Flu/Cy/TBI preparative regimen and bone marrow grafts; however, relapse rates remained relatively high (Luznik et al. BBMT. 2008). This led to the increased use of myeloablative (MA) regimens for haplo-SCT, which have been associated with decreased relapse rates (Bashey et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013). Most studies have used a MA total body irradiation (TBI) based regimen for haplo-SCT. Preparative regimens using fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel), with or without thiotepa, ATG, and/or low dose TBI have also been reported using bone marrow grafts. Reports on the safety and toxicity of FluMel in the haplo-SCT setting with PTCy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts are lacking. In this two-center retrospective analysis, the safety/toxicity of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT was evaluated. We report increased early mortality and toxicity using standard FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for patients undergoing haplo-SCT with PTCy. 38 patients at the University of Rochester Medical Center and the Washington University School of Medicine underwent haplo-SCT with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts between 2015-2019. Outcomes were measured by retrospective chart review through July 2019. 34 patients (89.5%) received FluMel(140 mg/m2). Two patients received FluMel(100 mg/m2) and two patients received FluMel(140 mg/m2) + ATG. The median age at time of haplo-SCT was 60 years (range 21-73). 20 patients were transplanted for AML, eight for MDS, two for PMF, two for NHL, and five for other malignancies. The median Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score was 4 (≥3 indicates high risk). 11 patients had a history of prior stem cell transplant, and 16 patients had active disease prior to their haplo-SCT. Seven patients had sex mismatch with their stem cell donor. Median donor age was 42 (range 21-71). 20 patient deaths occurred by July 2019 with a median follow up of 244 days for surviving patients. Nine patients died before day +100 (D100, "early mortality"), with a D100 non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of 24%. Median overall and relapse free survival (OS and RFS, respectively) were 197 days (95% CI 142-not reached) and 180 days (95% CI 141-not reached), respectively, for the entire cohort. The 1 year OS and NRM were 29% and 50%. The incidence of grades 2-4cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 66%, and 52% of these patients were treated with tocilizumab. CRS was strongly associated with early mortality, with D100 NRM of 36% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS compared to 0% in those with grade 0-1. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 64% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS, and 8% in those without (p < 0.001). 28% of patients with AKI required dialysis. Grade 2-4 CRS was seen in 54% of patients in remission prior to haplo-SCT and in 92% of those with active disease (p = 0.02). Of the 9 patients with early mortality, 89% had AKI, 44% needed dialysis, and 100% had grade 2-4 CRS, compared to 31%, 10%, and 55% in those without early mortality (p = 0.002, p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Early mortality was not significantly associated with age, HCT-CI score, second transplant, disease status at transplant, total dose of melphalan, volume overload/diuretic use, or post-transplant infection. In conclusion, we observed a very high rate of NRM with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for haplo-SCT with PTCy. The pattern of toxicity was strongly associated with grade 2-4 CRS, AKI, and need for dialysis. These complications may be mediated by excessive inflammation in the context of allo-reactive donor T-cell over-activation. Consistent with this, multiple groups have shown that FluMel conditioning in haplo-SCT is safe when using bone marrow or T-cell depleted grafts. Based on our institutional experiences, we would discourage the use of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT with PTCy with T-cell replete PBSC grafts. Alternative regimens or variations on melphalan-based regimens, such as fractionated melphalan dosing or inclusion of TBI may improve outcomes but further study and randomized controlled trials are needed. This study is limited in its retrospective design and sample size. Figure Disclosures DiPersio: WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liesveld:Onconova: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

COMPARISON Among Citology, Histology, and FLOW Cytometry IN Evaluating Blast VALUES IN Myelodysplatic Syndromes (MDS). Survey FROM the Italian “PIEMONTE MDS REGISTRY”

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4028.4028 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4028-4028

Author(s):

Alessandro Levis ◽

Daniela Maria Gioia ◽

Laura Godio ◽

Mauro Girotto ◽

Bernardino Allione ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Laboratory Data ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Blast Count

Abstract Abstract 4028 BACKGROUND. The corner stone of the WHO classification and prognostic scores of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is the blast count in bone marrow. The standard cytology evaluation of at least 500 bone marrow cells is easy to perform, but some concerns arise about reproducibility of this method. Nowadays bone marrow trephine biopsy and flow cytometry are frequently considered for the diagnosis of MDS. However there is so far paucity of data comparing cytology, histology and flow cytometry in quantifying bone marrow blasts in order to differentiate non RAEB from BAEB-I and RAEB-II cases. AIM OF THE WORK. The Aim of the work was to analyse the differences and the prognostic impact of cytology, histology and flow cytometry in differentiating non RAEB from BAEB-I and RAEB-II. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Since 1999, clinical and laboratory data from 1256 new cases of MDS were prospectively recorded into the Piemonte MDS Registry. Blast count could be performed with the three different methods: BMC (bone marrow cytology) has been performed in 844 cases, BMH (bone marrow histology) in 874 cases, and BMF (bone marrow flow cytometry) in 636. In order to quantify blasts, immune-histochemistry evaluation of CD34+ cells was used in BMH, while both CD34+ and CD117+ cells were considered in BMF. Out of the total of the 636 patients analysed by BMF only 420 had an accurate and complete registration of CD34 and CD117 positivity and were considered for the present analysis. In two hundred and thirty six cases all three evaluations were contemporary available. The concordance of each diagnostic method with the others and their prognostic value were evaluated in both univariate and multivariate analyses. A comparison between BMC and BMH was available in 571 cases, between BMC and BMF in 228 cases, and between BMH and BMF in 279 cases. RESULTS. The disagreement in classifying patients as non-RAEB or RAEB-I or RAEB-II between BMC and BMH was 156/571 (27%), with BMH over-evaluating blasts in 114/571 cases (20%) and under-evaluating blasts in 42/571 cases (7%). The disagreement between BMC and BMF was 80/228 (35%), with BMF over-evaluating and under-evaluating blast percentage in comparison to BMC in 53/228 (23%) and in 27/228 (12%) cases respectively. The disagreement between BMH and BMF was present in 113/279 (41%), with BMF over-evaluating and under-evaluating blast percentage in comparison to BMH in 44/279 (16%) and in 69/279 (25%) cases respectively. In univariate analysis all three methods of quantifing blasts and differentiating non-RAEB from RAEB-I and RAEB-II retained an important prognostic value for both leukemic evolution and survival. However when the three models were tested in multivariate analysis in order to define the best predictor of leukemic evolution, BMC retained the best predictive value. CONCLUSIONS. When BMH or BMF are used instead of BMC in order differentiate non-RAEB from RAEB-I and RAEB-II, the shift to a different WHO category is evident in at least 30% of patients and BMH and BMF do not play the same role as BMC. BMC still remain the standard method to quantify blasts for classification and prognostic evaluation of MDS. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib Maintenance (BM) or Consolidation (BC) Following Aggressive Immunochemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): 8 Year Follow up of CALGB 50403 (Alliance)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112655 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 146-146 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Lawrence D Kaplan ◽

Matthew J. Maurer ◽

Wendy Stock ◽

Nancy L. Bartlett ◽

Noreen Fulton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dropout Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Post Induction

Abstract Introduction: Aggressive chemo-immunotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell autografting (ASCT) in CALGB (Alliance) 59909 achieved a median progression-free survival (PFS) in MCL of 5 years (Damon et al JCO, 2009), but late recurrences occurred. Using the CALGB 59909 treatment backbone, we evaluated tolerability and efficacy of adding post-transplant bortezomib consolidation (BC) or maintenance (BM)in a randomized phase II trial. Interim results of CALGB (Alliance) 50403 were previously presented (ASH 2015) demonstrating 5 yr PFS 70% and 69% for the BM and BC arms respectively. We now report final 8 year follow up results from this trial and compare outcomes to CALGB 59909, which differed from CALGB 50403 only by the absence of post-transplant bortezomib. Methods: The primary endpoint was PFS measured from randomization for each treatment arm. Induction therapy was with 2-3 cycles of augmented R-CHOP (2000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide) and methotrexate (300 mg/m2) followed by high-dose cytarabine/etoposide/rituximab(R)/filgrastim (EAR) stem cell mobilization and cyclophosphamide/carmustine/etoposide (CBV) ASCT. After 2 doses of post-transplant R, patients were randomized to BC (1.3 mg/ m2 IV days 1, 4, 8, 11 of a 3-week cycle for 4 cycles) or BM (1.6 mg/m2 IV weekly x4 every 8 weeks for 18 months) beginning at approximately day 90. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was analyzed using patient-specific PCR probes for the bcl-1 / IgH junction or the IgH CDR3 region. Results: 151 patients were enrolled from 10/2006 - 6/2010 at 14 sites; 147 who received treatment are included in this analysis. Median age was 59 years (29-69); stage II (2.7%), III (11.6%), IV (85.0%); MIPI low (52.4%), intermediate (30.6%), high (17.0%); blastoid histology (12.9%); bone marrow involvement (81.0%); Ki67 was evaluated in 86 and was >30% in 17.4% of patients. 118 (80%) underwent ASCT and 102 (68%) were randomized. Most withdrawals (45) were for progression (10) or adverse events (AEs) (19) including 4 treatment-related deaths. Fifty-two patients were randomized to BM and 50 to BC. Following randomization, 34 (65%) completed BM and 33 (66%) completed BC. Withdrawal for AEs occurred in 14 (28%) of BC and 7 (13%) of BM patients (p = 0.09), most for cytopenias or peripheral neuropathy. With a median follow-up 7.8 years from randomization (8.3 from registration), the median PFS from randomization for the BM arm was not reached and was 8.9 years (95% CI 7.2 to not reached) for the BC arm. Both arms had median PFS significantly greater than the null hypothesis setting median PFS to 4 years (p < 0.001; 1-sided test of exponential parameter)The 8-year PFS estimates in the BM and BC arms were 77% (95% CI 66-90%) and 58% (95% CI 44-76%), respectively. Among all 147 patients treated on CALGB 50403, 8-year PFS from time of registration was 43.6% (35.6-53.3%). PFS from registration was not significantly extended in CALGB 50403 compared with CALGB 59909 (log rank p=0.24), but using a landmark analysis from time of transplant, PFS was significantly extended in CALGB 50403 (log rank p=0.005)(fig 1). Baseline patient characteristics in the two studies were not significantly different. In CALGB 50403, 8-year PFS from registration by MIPI was 52.0% (95% CI 41.1-66.0%) in MIPI low risk, 37.5% (95% CI 25.3-55.4%) in intermediate risk, and 28.2% (95% CI 13.7-57.9%) in high-risk. Bone marrow MRD results were collected for 42 patients post-induction therapy; 8-year PFS estimates were 80.2% (95% CI 62.2-100%) (n=17) and 43.2% (95% CI 27.3-68.2%) (n=25) for MRD-negative and MRD-positive patients, respectively (p=0.009). Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy followed by ASCT and either BC or BM was efficacious and tolerable, although BC was associated with more withdrawals for toxicity. PFS was not significantly different between BC and BM. The comparison between studies 50403 and 59909 with long-term follow up continues to suggest a PFS benefit from the addition of BC or BM among patients undergoing transplant. This did not translate into a PFS benefit from time of study enrollment possibly due to the higher pre-transplant dropout rate in 50403. MRD-negativity following induction chemo-immunotherapy is highly associated with improved PFS and the role of ASCT in post-induction MRD-negative patients is currently under investigation in a randomized clinical trial. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00310037 Disclosures Kaplan: Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Maurer:Celgene: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Nanostring: Research Funding. Stock:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Bartlett:Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Blum:Acerta: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy. LaCasce:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Data safety and monitoring board. Leonard:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Biotest: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; United Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sutro: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Cheson:AbbVie, Roche/Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Primary Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas: A Study from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) and the French Study Group on Cutaneous Lymphomas (GFLEC)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119566 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3341-3341 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sarah Faiz ◽

Henry Abi Rached ◽

Edouard Forcade ◽

Noel Milpied ◽

Marie Beylot-Barry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

T Cell Lymphomas ◽

Cutaneous Lymphomas

Abstract Introduction: Primary cutaneous T cell lymphomas (PCTCL) including Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) account for 75% of primary cutaneous lymphomas. The 5-year survival is 18-40% in patients with advanced-stage PCTCL. Management strategies and prognosis of PCTCL depend on the disease stage (affected body surface area, blood, visceral and nodal involvement). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) can be used to treat advanced stages in young adults who are otherwise in good health. However, post-transplant relapse is still an issue with no clear guidelines regarding its management. Here we describe the largest study investigating donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) in patients who relapsed after allo-HCT for PCTCL. Patients and methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, French multicenter study. Between January the 1st 2000 and December the 31st 2017, all patients who underwent an allo-HCT for PCTCL regardless of the subtype and who received DLI for a post-transplant relapse were included. Data were collected using the ProMISE database. As needed, centers were asked to provide additional data. Statistical analyses were carried out by the Lille University Hospital (CHRU Lille) Biostatistics Methodology Unit and were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute version 9.4). Results: All 13 patients who received DLI after allo-HCT for a PCTCL in France were enrolled in the study (Figure 1). Mean duration of follow-up was 718 days. See table 1 for study population characteristics. Four patients (30%) presented acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) following allo-HCT, of which no incidences were superior to grade 2. Those four patients relapsed at day 342, 463, 499 and 659 after allo-HCT. Five patients (38%) presented chronic GVHD of which three had an extensive presentation. Those three patients relapsed at day 1082, 1568 and 1861. Table 2 details relapses and relapse management in our cohort. Table 3 shows parameters relative to allo-HCT, post-therapeutic management, and follow-up. Objective response rates to DLI was 62% (n=8). Five patients (38%) showed complete response and three patients exhibited partial response (32%). Five patients (38%) did not respond to DLI. The median best response duration to DLI was 181 days. Six out of the eight patients who responded to DLI relapsed (75%); the median time before the relapse after DLI was of 405 days. The two patients who have received DLI and did not relapse on January the 1st 2018 had 321 and 1350 days follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 46% at 1 year and 19% at 5 years (Figure 2). Overall survival rates were 100% at 1 year and 59% at 5 years (Figure 3). Six patients (46%) presented GVHD after DLI of which three cases were chronic GVHD. Two of them was an extensive presentation. One patient had received an allo-HCT from a female donor. One patient received bone marrow transplant carrying a 9/10 mismatch. All other patients received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation; two of them received a geno-identical stem cell transplantation from sibling donors and three patients received non-sibling donor HSCT with a 10/10 mismatch. Only three patients received DLI following SFGM-TC guidelines. Four patients died before January the 1st 2018 in our cohort. One patient died because of direct complications of the HSCT and related treatments. Two patients died because of a disease relapse. One patient died from unrelated cause (severe pulmonary). Conclusion: With a 5-year survival rate of 59% from the date of post-transplant relapse, DLI appears to be an effective treatment in cases of patient relapse after allo-HCT for PCTCL. DLI should be considered in the management of post-transplant relapse whenever possible. To our best knowledge, this is the largest study cohort investigating DLI in the post-transplant setting Disclosures Bagot: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peffault De Latour:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Related Conditions: Rates of Discordance between Local and Central Review in the NHLBI MDS Natural History Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116629 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4370-4370 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ling Zhang ◽

Donald M Stablein ◽

Pearlie Epling-Burnette ◽

Alexandra M. Harrington ◽

Lynn C. Moscinski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Natural History ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Diagnostic Errors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Natural History Study ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Blast Count

Abstract Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a collection of hematopoietic disorders with widely variable prognoses and treatment options. Pathologic diagnosis can be challenging and misdiagnosis can impact patient therapy and outcome. How commonly misdiagnosis occurs, and the severity of diagnostic errors, is not known. Here, we report interim analyses of patients (pts) with cytopenia and suspected MDS from the NHLBI National MDS Natural History Study (https://thenationalmdsstudy.net ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02775383) assessing MDS occurrence and rates of agreement on classification of MDS/MDS-related disorders by local and centralized review. Methods Pts with cytopenias and clinically suspected MDS were identified between 6/16 and 6/18 from 84 participating centers in this ongoing multi-Institutional Cooperative Group study, with a goal of recruiting 2000 MDS (WHO 2016 subcategories), MDS/MPN or low blast count acute myeloid leukemia (AML, <30% blasts without core binding factor) and 500 cases with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) from both NCI community oncology research program (NCORP) and lead academic participating sites. Centrally submitted clinical and pathologic data and bone marrow samples were analyzed by pathologists in the central laboratory & biorepository (CL/B) blinded to the original site's diagnosis, with a third-level review for cases with disagreement between the local and CL/B assignment. Disagreements in the 5 categories detailed in Figure 1 were considered clinically meaningful. Cases were assigned to longitudinal (MDS, MDS/MPN, ICUS, low blast count AML) versus cross-sectional (other cytopenias or cancers) cohorts after central classification based on clinical, pathologic, and cytogenetic features. Interrater-agreement was evaluated with the Kappa statistic. Results Of 375 pts for whom data and samples were submitted with completed classification, 88 (23%) had MDS, 15 (4%) MDS/MPN, 12 (3%) ICUS, 23 (8%) AML, and 237 (63%) other cytopenias (Figure 1). The median age of all pts was 71 years (range, 20-92), 44% were female, and median baseline blood counts and other baseline measures are in Figure 2. MDS pts had single lineage dysplasia (SLD, 0), SLD with ring sideroblasts (RS, 9 (10%)), multi-lineage dysplasia (MLD, 17 (19%)), MLD -RS (18 (20%)), excess blasts I (EB, 14 (16%)), EBII (19 (22%)), del(5q) (6 (7%)), and MDS-U (5(6%)). IPSS-R categories were defined in 51 of 88 MDS cases (58%): Very Low (27%), Low (43%), Intermediate (27%), High (16%), and Very High (14%). Overall site/central agreement on diagnosis occurred in 225 cases (60%) with inconsistency associated with recognized site coding errors resolved in 54 cases (14%) without 3rd party review. Seventy-eight others (21%) were referred to 3rd level review; confirmation of CL/B classification occurred in 49/78 cases (63%), agreement with site in 13/78 (17%), and a different diagnosis in 16/78 (21%). Clinically meaningful changes in diagnoses between local and central review occurred 26% of the time (Figure 1, n=97/375 kappa =.53 95% CI (.45, .61)). Site assigned MDS was changed to ICUS or other cytopenia in 35% (n=34/99); and to AML in 3% (n=3/99). For cases with site assignment to other causes of cytopenias (225 of 375 cases, 60%), central assignment identified ICUS in 3, MDS/MPN overlap in 8, AML in 2 and MDS in 22, totaling a change in diagnosis in 16%. Of note, 60% (15/25) of ICUS diagnosed locally were interpreted as reactive marrow or normal according to central review. Within MDS cases diagnosed locally, the greatest discrepancy was observed in the MDS-U classification, reported 31 times (31/99 31%) but confirmed in only 2 cases (6%), with 22 (71%) found to not have MDS. Across the study when compared to local assignment, central review changed the follow-up cohort assignment for 87 pts (23%). Conclusions In this well-characterized series of pts evaluated for MDS with bone marrow biopsy and paired site/central morphologic assessment, 40% of site diagnoses were changed at central review and site coding errors were common. In 26%, the changes were clinically meaningful, potentially affecting patient treatment and prognosis. In particular, site designation of MDS-U was an unreliable classification category, which could only partially be attributed to miscoding errors at the local site. Incorporating genomics data might help refine MDS diagnoses. Disclosures Bejar: Genoptix: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Modus Outcomes: Consultancy; Astex/Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy. Komrokji:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Scott:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sekeres:Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Interactions between Donor Activating Killer Immunoglobulin-like Receptors (KIRs) and Somatic Mutations and Their Association with Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131011 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4599-4599

Author(s):

Sanghee Hong ◽

Lisa Rybicki ◽

Aiwen Zhang ◽

Dawn Thomas ◽

Cassandra M Kerr ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Nk Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Transplant Outcomes ◽

Kir Haplotypes

Background: Graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) responses after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for AML are mediated by alloreactive donor-derived immune effector cells including T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells. The function of NK cells is regulated by inhibitory and activating signals mediated through cell-surface receptors, including KIRs. Various models of NK cell alloreactivity have been associated with post-transplant outcomes, including leukemia relapse. However, these results have varied widely between different investigators employing similar models of NK cell alloreactivity. Assessment of somatic mutations in AML on post-transplant outcomes has not been investigated in the context of KIR profiles. Methods: In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, we investigated KIR haplotypes (haplotype AA vs. Bx [associated with multiple activating KIRs]; Cooley S., et al. Blood. 113:726-732. 2009) in the context of somatic mutations. We included 34 adult patients with AML who underwent alloHCT from a matched related donor from 2006 to 2013. A targeted multi-amplicon deep NGS panel of 79 commonly mutated genes in myeloid neoplasia was performed. Post-HCT outcomes were assessed based on mutational status and KIR haplotype with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: Median age at transplant was 54 (range 31-73). Cytogenetic risk groups were 9% favorable, 56% intermediate, and 35% poor based on 2017 ELN classification. HCT-CI scores included 26% low, 32% intermediate, and 41% high. Disease risk group defined by ASTCT included 71% low, 26% intermediate, and 3% high. Disease status at HCT included 74% CR1 and 26% CR2. Frequencies of somatic mutations prior to HCT were: 21% DNMT3A, 18% IDH2, 9% each for STAG2 and NRAS, 6% each for ASXL1, JAK2, PHF6, RUNX1, TET2, and 3% each for CBL, FLT3, NPM1, and U2AF1. Overall, 53% of patients had at least 1 mutation: 24%, 18%, 9%, and 3% of patients had 1, 2, 3, and 4 mutations, respectively. 41% were carriers of KIR haplotype AA, and 59% were haplotype Bx. Relapse (p=0.40), relapse-free (p=0.33), and overall survival (p=0.30) between haplotypes AA and Bx were not statistically different. However, when considering somatic mutations in the context of KIR haplotypes, those with any somatic mutation (n= 18) present had inferior relapse-free (p=0.002) and overall survival (p=0.002; figures A-B) as compared to those with none. Further assessment of outcomes was then considered for those who had the following poor prognostic mutations (n=12): ASXL1, DNMT3A, FLT3, NRAS, RUNX1, and TET2. KIR haplotype AA with one or more of these mutations was associated with inferior relapse-free (p=0.05) and overall survival (p=0.008). At median follow-up of 83 (range 66-137) months, 38% were alive. Non-relapse mortality rates were 21% (9-36) at 1 year and 29% (15-39) at 3 years. The most common causes of death for all patients were relapse (48%) followed by infection (33%). Conclusion: In presence of somatic mutations, carrying KIR haplotypes Bx was associated with better survival in AML post-alloHCT. The presence of multiple activating KIRs may also help mitigate the worse prognosis associated with some of the more deleterious somatic mutations in AML. These observations may have implications for improving patient risk stratification prior to transplant and optimizing donor selection. Future investigation with larger cohorts interrogating KIR haplotypes in the context of pre-transplant AML somatic mutations on post-transplant outcomes may further elucidate which patients may benefit most from transplant. Disclosures Nazha: Tolero, Karyopharma: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmacutical: Research Funding; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; MEI: Other: Data monitoring Committee. Mukherjee:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Projects in Knowledge: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC (PHAR, LLC): Consultancy; McGraw Hill Hematology Oncology Board Review: Other: Editor; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Advani:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Gerds:Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Imago Biosciences: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Majhail:Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Atara Bio: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Nkarta: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Maciejewski:Novartis: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Experience with Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia Evolving after Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130167 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1226-1226

Author(s):

Hassan Awada ◽

Reda Z. Mahfouz ◽

Jibran Durrani ◽

Ashwin Kishtagari ◽

Deepa Jagadeesh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Viral Infections ◽

De Novo ◽

Post Transplantation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Stat3 Mutations

T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia (T-LGLL) is a clonal proliferation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). T-LGLL mainly manifest in elderly and is associated with autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), B cell dyscrasias, non-hematologic cancers and immunodeficiency (e.g., hypogammaglobulinemia). LGL manifestations often resemble reactive immune processes leading to the dilemmas that LGLs act like CTL expansion during viral infections (for example EBV associated infectious mononucleosis). While studying a cohort of 246 adult patients with T-LGLL seen at Cleveland Clinic over the past 10 years, we encountered 15 cases of overt T-LGLL following transplantation of solid organs (SOT; n=8) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; n=7). Although early studies reported on the occurrence of LGL post-transplant, these studies focused on the analysis of oligoclonality skewed reactive CTL responses rather than frank T-LGLL. We aimed to characterize post-transplantation T-LGLL in SOT and HSCT simultaneously and compare them to a control group of 231 de novo T-LGLL (cases with no history of SOT or HSCT). To characterize an unambiguous "WHO-defined T-LGLL" we applied stringent and uniform criteria. All cases were diagnosed if 3 out of 4 criteria were fulfilled, including: 1) LGL count >500/µL in blood for more than 6 months; 2) abnormal CTLs expressing CD3, CD8 and CD57 by flow cytometry; 3) preferential usage of a TCR Vβ family by flow cytometry; 4) TCR gene rearrangement by PCR. In addition, targeted deep sequencing for STAT3 mutations was performed and charts of bone marrow biopsies were reviewed to exclude other possible conditions. Diagnosis was made 0.2-27 yrs post-transplantation (median: 4 yrs). At the time of T-LGLL diagnosis, relative lymphocytosis (15-91%), T lymphocytosis (49-99%) and elevated absolute LGL counts (>500 /µL; 93%) were also seen. Post-transplantation T-LGLL were significantly younger than de novo T-LGLL, (median age: 48 vs. 61 yr; P<.0001). Sixty% of post-transplantation T-LGLL patients were males. Fifteen% of patients had more cytogenetic abnormalities compared to de novo T-LGLL, had a lower absolute LGL count (median: 4.5 vs. 8.5 k/µL) and had less frequent neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia (27 vs. 43%, 33 vs. 35% and 20% vs. 55%; P=.01). TCR Vb analysis identified clonal expansion of ≥1 of the Vb proteins in 60% (n=9) of the patients; the remaining 40% (n=6) of the cases had either a clonal process involving a Vb protein not tested in the panel (20%; n=3) or no clear expansion (20%; n=3). Signs of rejection were observed in 20% (n=3/15) and GvHD in 13% (n=2/15) of the patients. Post-transplantation, 27% of cases presented with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.5 x109/L; n=4), 33% with thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150 x109/L; n=5) and 25% with anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL; n=3). T-LGLL evolved in 10 patients (67%; 10/15) despite IST including cyclosporine (n=5), tacrolimus (n=4), mycophenolate mofetil (n=5), cyclophosphamide (n=1), anti-thymocyte globulin (n=1), and corticosteroids (n=6). Lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly were seen in 13% (n=2) and 33% (n=5) of the patients. Other conditions observed were MGUS (20%; n=3) and RA (7%; n=1). Conventional cytogenetic showed normal karyotype in 89% (n=11, tested individuals 13/15). Somatic STAT3 mutations were identified in 2 patients. Sixty% of cases (n=9) were seropositive for EBV when tested at different time points after transplant. Similarly, 53% (n=8) were seropositive for CMV, of which, 5 were positive post-transplantation and 3 pre-/post-transplantation. The complexity of T-LGLL expansion post-transplantation might be due to several mechanisms including active viral infections, latent oncogenic viral reactivation and graft allo-antigenic stimulation. However, in our cohort graft rejection or GvHD was encountered in a few patients (2 allo-HSCT recipients). Autoimmune conditions were present in 50% of SOT recipients (n=4/ 8, including RA, ulcerative colitis, systemic lupus erythematosus). Some of our patients also had low immunoglobulin levels. Overt EBV (post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder) and CMV reactivation was diagnosed in only 27% (4/15) of the patients. In sum we report the long term follow up of a cohort of T-LGLL and emphasize the expansion of T-LGLL post-transplant highlighting the difficulty in assigning one unique origin of LGLL. Disclosures Hill: Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celegene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Majhail:Atara Bio: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Nkarta: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Sekeres:Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Impact of Modified Thalidomide Dosing in Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant-Eligible: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122775 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4739-4739

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Adrián Alegre ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Post Induction ◽

Adjusted Indirect Comparison ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: For patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are transplant-eligible, bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTd) is a standard of care (SoC) for induction and consolidation therapy. Clinical practice has evolved to use a modified VTd dose (VTd-mod; 100 mg thalidomide daily), which is reflected in recent treatment guidelines. As VTd-mod has become a real-world SoC, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the VTd-mod dose from recent clinical trials versus the dose included in the label (VTd-label; ramp up to 200 mg thalidomide daily) was performed to understand the effect on efficacy of modified VTd dosing for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. Methods: For each outcome (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], overall response rates [ORR] post-induction and post-transplant, and rate of peripheral neuropathy), a naïve comparison and a MAIC were performed. Data for VTd-label were obtained from the phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study (Rosiñol L, et al. Blood. 2012;120[8]:1589-1596). Data for VTd-mod were pooled from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study (Moreau P, et al. Lancet. 2019;394[10192]:29-38) and the phase 2 NCT00531453 study (Ludwig H, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31[2]:247-255). Patient-level data for PETHEMA/GEM and CASSIOPEIA were used to generate outcomes of interest and were validated against their respective clinical study reports; aggregate data for NCT00531453 were extracted from the primary publication. Matched baseline characteristics were age, sex, ECOG performance status, myeloma type, International Staging System (ISS) stage, baseline creatinine clearance, hemoglobin level, and platelet count. Results: Patients received VTd-mod (n = 591) or VTd-label (n = 130). After matching, baseline characteristics were similar across groups. For OS, the naïve comparison and the MAIC showed that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC HR, 0.640 [95% CI: 0.363-1.129], P = 0.121; Figure 1A). VTd-mod significantly improved PFS versus VTd-label in the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC HR, 0.672 [95% CI: 0.467-0.966], P = 0.031; Figure 1B). Post-induction ORR was non-inferior for VTd-mod versus VTd-label (MAIC odds ratio, 1.781 [95% CI: 1.004-3.16], P = 0.065). Post-transplant, VTd-mod demonstrated superior ORR in both the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC odds ratio, 2.661 [95% CI: 1.579-4.484], P = 0.001). For rates of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy, the naïve comparison and MAIC both demonstrated that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC rate difference, 2.4 [⁻1.7-6.49], P = 0.409). Conclusions: As naïve, indirect comparisons are prone to bias due to patient heterogeneity between studies, a MAIC can provide useful insights for clinicians and reimbursement decision-makers regarding the relative efficacy and safety of different treatments. In this MAIC, non-inferiority of VTd-mod versus VTd-label was demonstrated for OS, post-induction ORR, and peripheral neuropathy. This analysis also showed that VTd-mod significantly improved PFS and ORR post-transplant compared with VTd-label for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. A limitation of this analysis is that unreported or unobserved confounding factors could not be adjusted for. Disclosures Sonneveld: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; SkylineDx: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mateos:Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Adaptive: Honoraria; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech Inc, Mundipharma EDO, PharmaMar, Roche Laboratories Inc, Takeda Oncology: Other: Advisory Committee; Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, GSK, Abbvie, EDO, Pharmar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Takeda Oncology.: Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc: Other: Data and Monitoring Committee. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria. Hashim:Ingress-Health: Employment. Vincken:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kampfenkel:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cote:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125449 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2609-2609

Author(s):

Muhned Alhumaid ◽

Georgina S Daher-Reyes ◽

Wilson Lam ◽

Arjun Law ◽

Tracy Murphy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Behavior

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are rarely reported as an isolated subgroup. Treatments vary little across age groups, and treatment intensity depends upon comorbid conditions and performance status. Optimal treatment strategies focused on disease behavior, biological factors, and the distinct needs of this subset of AML patients remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the characteristics and outcomes of AYA AML patients treated at a specialized adult leukemia cancer center in comparison to older adults with AML (40-60 years). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2008-2018. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were recorded for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and the impact of covariates were assessed using the Log-rank test. Finally, we compared the outcomes of AYA patients treated at our centre between 2015-2018 with older patients. Results: A total of 175 patients aged 18-39 were identified. Patient characteristics are shown in (Table 1). Cytogenetic were available in 163 patients. Based on MRC criteria, 27 (16%) were favorable risk, intermediate in 95 (54%), adverse in 39 (22%), and missing/failed in 14(8%). NPM1 status was available in 110 patients of whom 38 (35%) were positive. FLT3-ITD was available in 67 patients with 24 (36%) positive. Both mutations were present in 13 (54%) patients. There were no significant differences in terms of risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular markers based on age (18-29 vs.30-39) (P= 0.98). Most patients 172 (98%) received induction, 157 (91%) with 3+7, and 15 (9%) with FLAG-IDA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 133 (77%) after first induction [120 (76%) after 3+7 and 11 (73%) after FLAG-IDA]. Induction related mortality was low (2%). Of the 39 who did not achieve CR, thirty-four patients received re-induction (13 FLAG-IDA, 16 NOVE-HiDAC, 5 others) with CR in 21 (62%). Overall, 154 (89.5%) achieved CR1. Sixty-four (42%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in CR1. 59 (38%) patients relapsed in CR1 with 8 (12%) relapsing post HSCT. Fifty-five (5 post HSCT) patients received reinduction with 30 (51%) (2 after HSCT) achieving CR2. Fifteen patients received HSCT in CR2. OS and DFS at 2 years were 62% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and 50% (95% CI 0.41-0.57), respectively. Stratified by cytogenetic risk, OS was 81% for favorable risk, 61% for intermediate, and 50% for adverse risk (P=0.0001), respectively. DFS in these groups was 85%, 57%, and 46 % (P=0.0025), respectively. We further compared outcomes in the 18-29y and 30-39y age groups. The OS was 61.9% compared to 62.5% (P=0.91) and DFS of 52.1% compared to 47% (P=0.65) respectively. On univariate analysis for OS and DFS, cytogenetic risk stratification was the only significant variable (P=0.0004 and P=0.0042). We then compared the outcomes 67 sequential patients aged I8-39 treated from 2014-2018, with those of 176 sequential patients aged 40-60 treated during the same period (table 2). OS at 2 years was not statistically higher in the younger group compared to the older group (66.7% vs. 61.2%, P=0.372). While relapse rate was lower in older patients (15.5% vs. 22.6%, P=0.093), NRM was higher in older patients (29.7% vs. 18.8%,P=0.094). Conclusion: AYA pts. occupy a unique niche amongst AML as a whole. While treatment responses have improved in general, there may be potential for further gains in these patients. Increased tolerance for more intense treatment strategies as well as the incorporation of novel agents into standard treatment protocols may provide a means to optimize care in AYA patients. Finally, research is needed to elucidate biological mechanisms and predictors of disease behavior instead of arbitrary, age-stratified treatment schema. Disclosures McNamara: Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text