Characterization of Real World Survival Outcomes Among Older Adults with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Receiving Second Line Treatment in the Pre Novel-Agents Era: An Analysis of the 2007-2013 SEER-Medicare Database

Abstract Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia among adults in Western countries with a median age of 72 years at diagnosis. Prior to the introduction of kinase inhibitor therapies, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) combinations, monoclonal antibody monotherapies, and chemotherapy combinations were the predominant therapy regardless of line of CLL treatment. Given the increased frequency of high-risk features (del17p, del11q,) and prior exposure to CIT combinations, shortened disease-free periods and increased short-/long-term toxicities are frequently seen in relapsed CLL setting. However, data from recent randomized clinical trials of novel agents, such as ibrutinib in the relapsed setting, have shown significant improvements in overall survival (OS). While we await real-world data on how novel agents impact real-world CLL outcomes, little is known about the management and survival among CLL patients prior to their availability, particularly in the relapse setting. Our study uses comprehensive prescription and medical insurance claims linked with registry data to describe survival outcomes in older adults with CLL receiving second line treatment between 2007-2013--an era that predates the approvals of ibrutinib, idelalisib, venetoclax and obinutuzumab. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the 2007 to 2013 SEER-Medicare linked database. The sample included patients with first primary tumor site as CLL or SLL (ICD-O histology codes '9670' and '9823') diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. This date of first diagnosis of CLL or SLL defines the index date. Patients aged > 65 years with Medicare fee-for-service coverage in the 12 months pre-index and Medicare fee-for-service and prescription drug coverage in the 6-months post-index period or until death were included. Second line treatment date was defined as the date a treatment was received that was not part of the initial therapy or the date where initial therapy was restarted after a 180+ day gap in treatment. Our primary study outcome was overall survival (OS) from the date of initiation of second line treatment. The association of patient-level characteristics with OS was measured using cox regression analysis. Results: Of the 1047 patients who received any CLL treatment, 387 (37%) patients met the definition for receiving a second line of therapy. The mean age of this second line cohort was 76 years (SD = 6) and 48.3% were male. Only 9 patients who left fee-for-service Medicare during the second line follow up period were excluded from analysis. Of our 387 patient cohort, 25.3% (n=98) received fludarabine as part of their initial treatment, with remaining 74.7% (n=289) receiving a non-fludarabine containing initial therapy. The median time from CLL diagnosis date to second treatment was 664 days (Q1-Q3 390-1159 days). Rituximab containing regimens were the most common second line treatment (n=276, 71.3% of patients), with 118 patients (30.5%) in our second line cohort receiving rituximab monotherapy. Another 35 (9%) patients received chlorambucil monotherapy and the remaining 76 (19.6%) patients received a non-rituximab mono- or combination chemotherapy as their second line treatment. The median follow-up time in the sample from second line treatment was 14.9 months. Median OS for the cohort from initiation of their second line of treatment was 34.3 months, with 72% OS at 1-year and 58% at 2-years (See Figure). Multivariate Cox regression modeling showed OS from second line of treatment was associated with year of CLL diagnosis (2011 vs. 2007, HR 2.2; p=0.02), higher age at time of treatment (70-74 vs 80+, HR 0.67; P=0.04), male gender (HR 1.5; P=0.01), Northeast census region (vs West, HR 1.7; P=0.01),and initial treatment that included fludarabine (HR 1.5; P=0.04). Conclusions: In our real world analysis, over one-third of the newly diagnosed CLL patients who received treatment progressed to second line therapy. We found poor survival in these older adults following initiation of second line CLL therapy treated in the pre-kinase / BCL-2 inhibitor era with about half who died within two years of initiating second line therapy. While available clinical trials suggest novel CLL agents offer significant improvements in OS in relapsed CLL, future studies should examine real world CLL outcomes to correlate how results obtained in recent landmark clinical trials translate into clinical practice. Disclosures Mato: Abbvie, Acerta Pharma, Gilead Sciences, ProNAi, TG Therapeutics, Theradex: Research Funding; Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Pharmacyclics, TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. Mehra:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahler:Janssen Research & Development: Employment. Doshi:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc.: Other: Spouse owns stock in company, Research Funding; Alkermes: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forest Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; National Pharmaceutical Council: Research Funding; PhRMA: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck & Co., Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Spouse owns stock; Sanofi: Research Funding; Humana: Research Funding. Huntington:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Oncosec Medical: Equity Ownership; Exelixis: Equity Ownership; Geron: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Real-World Outcomes for Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone, or Bortezomib and Dexamethasone: An Enhanced Electronic Health Records Database Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111121 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2243-2243

Author(s):

Ajai Chari ◽

Brian Ung ◽

Marc Tian ◽

Amit Agarwal ◽

Kejal Parikh

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: For transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), the only category 1 regimens recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) are lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based, including triplet therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) (NCCN Myeloma v4.2018). Other doublet regimens, such as bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd), are still a first-line option for patients with NDMM, especially for those who are elderly and/or frail. However, the latter population is either excluded or markedly underrepresented in clinical trials. Using an electronic health records (EHRs) database, we compared outcomes when either RVd or Vd were used in the treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM in a real-world practice setting, after adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical differences between the two cohorts. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients with NDMM was conducted using EHRs from a nationally representative database (Flatiron Health). The Flatiron Network database is an enhanced oncology EHR database of patients treated at 265 clinics throughout the USA. Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma, ICD-9 (203.0x) or ICD-10 (C90.xx), between January 2011 and May 2018 who were treated with RVd or Vd and did not undergo stem cell transplantation were included in the analysis. The primary comparison was time to next therapy (TTNT) in the overall population and in a subset of frail patients, as determined by a composite score based on age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Data regarding overall and progression-free survival (PFS) were limited as patient data prior to adoption of the Flatiron Network database were incomplete. Treatment-free interval (TFI) for patients who initiated a second-line therapy was defined as time from start of first-line to start of second-line therapy minus the duration of therapy (DOT). The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods were used to calculate TTNT after adjusting for differences in patient baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Of the 8,470 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM in the database, 2,369 were treated with either RVd (n = 1,309) or Vd (n = 1,060) and met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. Patients treated with Vd were more likely to be older (median age 75 vs 70 years; P < 0.0001), frail (76.3% vs 65.4%; P = 0.0002), have creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min (23.9% vs 10.7%, P < 0.0001), have a higher ECOG PS score (P = 0.0031), and have International Staging System stage III disease (45.1% vs 28.8%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in baseline neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia, or in median CCI. The proportion of patients with high-risk cytogenetics was lower in the Vd group (19.7% vs 26.0%; P < 0.0001). The mean DOT was longer for RVd (11.4 ± standard deviation [SD] 13.3 months) than for Vd (7.7 ± SD 9.7 months). However, the median adjusted TTNT was significantly longer with RVd than Vd (40.9 vs 14.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.55; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients initiating a new treatment was lower in the RVd group (24.8% vs 40.6%; P < 0.0001). Among those who initiated a second-line therapy, the mean TFI for RVd compared with Vd was 42.6 versus 39.3 days, respectively (P = 0.2214). Among the 735 frail patients (416 RVd and 319 Vd), the median TTNT was significantly longer with RVd (32.6 vs 17.1 months; HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.29-0.54; P < 0.0001; Figure). Similar to the overall population, there were no significant differences in TFI (54.9 vs 29.6 days, P = 0.2598) and a significantly higher proportion of Vd patients initiated a new treatment (22.1% vs 36.4%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In this real-world practice setting where PFS cannot be measured directly, triplet therapy with RVd significantly prolonged TTNT compared with Vd by 26.1 months in the overall patient population, and by 15.5 months in frail transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. Disclosures Chari: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Consultancy; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Ung:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tian:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Agarwal:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parikh:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Characterization of Relapse and Second-Line Therapy in Lenalidomide-Refractory, Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Subanalysis of the Phase 3 First Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124557 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3122-3122

Author(s):

Salmon Manier ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

Xavier Leleu ◽

Michel Delforge ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Late Relapse ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Relapse ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Ecog Ps

BACKGROUND: Rd continuous is now a standard treatment option in patients (pts) with transplant-ineligible NDMM based on the results of the large phase 3 registrational FIRST trial showing significant PFS and OS benefits of lenalidomide (LEN) + low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous) vs melphalan + prednisone + thalidomide (MPT). However, pts who relapse on frontline LEN represent a growing population for whom there is limited clinical evidence on subsequent treatment. Factors associated with relapse within 12 mos in Rd- and MPT-treated pts (LDH ≥ 200 U/L, ISS stage III, high-risk cytogenetics, ECOG PS ≥ 2, and baseline platelet count ≤ 150 × 109/L) indicate that the individual risk of progression may involve a combination of disease biology, genetics, and pt-specific factors (Facon, EHA 2019). Physicians may consider these early relapse factors when making treatment decisions. To characterize pts relapsing while receiving frontline LEN, this analysis evaluated Rd-treated pts from the FIRST trial who progressed while receiving LEN based on their time of relapse, type of relapse (CRAB [symptomatic] vs non-CRAB [nonsymptomatic]), and second-line treatment. METHODS: Pts randomized to Rd continuous (n = 535) or Rd for 18 cycles (n = 541) arms and who progressed while receiving LEN or within 60 days of treatment end (per IMWG criteria) were pooled and grouped according to their time of relapse after randomization (< 12 mos = early< 12; 12-18 mos = early12-18, and > 18 mos = late relapse). The data cutoff was January 2016. RESULTS: Of the 389 pts who relapsed, 203 had early< 12 relapse, 69 had early12-18 relapse, and 117 had late relapse. Pts who relapsed within the first 12 mos or between 12 and 18 mos had higher rates of elevated LDH, ISS Stage III disease, and ECOG PS 2 compared with those who relapsed beyond 18 mos (Table). Early< 12 and early12-18 relapses were also associated with poor PFS and OS outcomes. Median PFS in pts with early< 12, early12-18, and late relapse was 6.5, 15.9, and 26.4 mos, and median OS was 26.8, 41.6, and 78.0 mos, respectively (Figure). Pts with late relapse had more dose reductions prior to PD vs those with early relapse and were more likely to experience nonsymptomatic progression. Across the 3 groups, in pts experiencing a nonsymptomatic progression who started second-line treatment, 88% started second-line treatment prior to experiencing CRAB symptoms. The median time from PD to second-line treatment was shorter in those with CRAB relapse (1.4-2.5 mos) vs non-CRAB relapse (2.5-5.9 mos). Second-line treatment was reported in 170 (83.7%), 62 (89.9%), and 99 (84.6%) pts with early< 12, early12-18, and late relapse, respectively. The majority of these pts received bortezomib-based regimens (65.6% overall), most commonly bortezomib + dexamethasone, bortezomib + melphalan + prednisone, or bortezomib + alkylator (cyclophosphamide or bendamustine). Second PFS was similar regardless of time of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis focused on an emerging and clinically relevant population of transplant-ineligible pts relapsing on frontline LEN. Pts with late relapse on LEN more commonly had nonsymptomatic progression vs pts relapsing early. This raises the question on the possible impact of the immune stimulatory effects of LEN in pts able to remain on therapy and achieve a longer OS and warrants further investigation of the biological impact of IMiD agent-based therapies on long-term disease control. The increase in dose reductions in the late- vs early-relapse groups is also an important consideration for continuous treatment. Consistent with the prior analysis of the FIRST study exploring Rd and MPT-treated pts with early< 12 relapse (Facon, EHA), pts relapsing on LEN within 12 mos and between 12-18 mos both appeared to have functionally high-risk disease and represent a population with an unmet need that should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials investigating new therapeutic strategies. Due to the timing of the FIRST trial, limited novel-novel agent combination treatments were available at relapse, and the majority of pts received bortezomib-based second-line regimens. These results highlight the need for effective therapies for pts with early relapse. Further characterization of first- and second-line outcomes according to type of relapse are ongoing and will be reported at the meeting. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Sanofi Oncology: Research Funding. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria. Leleu:Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Carsgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Delforge:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen , Takeda: Honoraria. Weisel:Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Costa:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Robinson:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Clinical Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Among Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT)-Eligible and RCT-Ineligible Patients: Results from the Connect® MM Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126143 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1843-1843

Author(s):

Lynne I. Wagner ◽

Kathleen Toomey ◽

Sikander Ailawadhi ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Cristina Gasparetto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

World Population ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Ecog Ps

Background: MM clinical trials often have stringent eligibility criteria that limit the enrollment of patients (pts) reflective of the general patient population (Shah, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2017). The Connect® MM Registry, a prospective observational study of pts with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) in the US, provided the opportunity to examine differences between pts with MM who were identified as RCT-eligible vs -ineligible, to observe the generalizability of clinical trial results to real-world clinical settings. Differences in baseline characteristics, treatment, clinical outcomes, and HRQoL were examined in RCT-eligible and -ineligible pts from this registry, which represents an unselected, broad real-world population. Methods: Pts with NDMM were enrolled at 250 community, academic, and government sites. Eligible pts were ≥18 y of age with symptomatic MM diagnosed ≤2 months preenrollment per the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. For this analysis, pts were considered ineligible for RCT per the following key exclusion criteria previously described: absolute neutrophil count ≤1.5 × 109/L, platelet count ≤75 × 109/L, creatinine >2.5 mg/dL, AST/ALT >3 times the ULN, peripheral neuropathy grade >2; ECOG PS 3/4; history of myelodysplastic syndromes/other hematologic malignancies, or solid tumors (Shah 2017). Sites administered pt HRQoL questionnaires and provided clinical data at baseline and quarterly during follow-up until death or study discontinuation. Differences in HRQoL at baseline, changes from baseline to 1 and 2 years, and survival outcomes, adjusted for covariates via propensity score, were compared between RCT-eligible/-ineligible pts. Results: Of the 3011 pts enrolled, 2873 pts met the CRAB (hyperCalcemia, Renal failure, Anemia, and Bone disease) criteria per IMWG at enrollment. Of these, 1622 (56.5%) were identified as RCT-eligible and 1251 (43.5%) as RCT-ineligible (data cut-off February 7, 2019). Both groups were similar in median age, sex, race, and ethnicity distribution, although the RCT-ineligible group had more pts aged ≥75 y (26.3% vs 23.2%) and more pts with ECOG PS 3/4 (6.2% vs none). Overall, 34.5% of RCT-ineligible pts received a transplant vs 42.8% of RCT-eligible pts. More RCT-ineligible pts had ISS stage III disease (39.4% vs 19.8%), elevated calcium (≥11.5 mg/dL; 12.7% vs 6.8%), elevated creatinine (>2.0 mg/dL; 40.3% vs 6.5%), and low hemoglobin (<10 g/dL or >2 g/dL <LLN; 60.8% vs 40.3%). Use of triplet treatment (54.2% vs 56.2%) and alkylator (24.9% vs 20.1%) was similar between the RCT-ineligible/-eligible groups. Lenalidomide + bortezomib + dexamethasone (RVd) was the most common initial therapy, and R was the most common maintenance therapy in both groups, but fewer RCT-ineligible pts received RVd as initial therapy (23.9% vs 31.0%) and R as first maintenance regimen (18.1% vs 22.7%). Absolute baseline HRQoL scores were significantly higher, indicating better HRQoL, in RCT-eligible (115.9) vs -ineligible (111.5) pts on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM) Total score (P=0.007), FACT-MM Trial Outcome Index (74.3 vs 70.3, P=0.002), and FACT-MM Subscale (37.3 vs 35.5, P=0.003). Scores were similar for EuroQol-5D Overall Index (0.73 vs 0.72, P=0.5) and Brief Pain Inventory (3.42 vs 3.43, P=0.9). Both RCT-eligible and -ineligible pts showed significant improvement in HRQoL from baseline at years 1 and 2, although the magnitude of improvement was similar between both groups (Fig. 1a and b). RCT-ineligible pts showed significantly shorter median PFS and OS vs RCT-eligible pts (Fig. 2 & 3, respectively). Conclusions: The CONNECT MM registry provided the opportunity to examine key differences between RCT-eligible and -ineligible pts. By applying common RCT eligibility criteria, a substantial proportion of MM pts (43.5%) in this real-world population may have been ineligible to participate in a RCT. RCT-ineligible pts had advanced disease, poor performance status, and poor laboratory parameters at baseline vs RCT-eligible pts, which could affect PFS and OS. These findings enhance our understanding of HRQoL among MM pts, which at present, is largely based on RCT participants. A similar magnitude of HRQoL improvement in both groups at 1 and 2 years suggests the need to evaluate RCT eligibility criteria in MM to help broaden enrollment and maximize external validity. Disclosures Wagner: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; American Cancer Society: Other: Section editor, Cancer journal. Toomey:Celgene: Consultancy. Ailawadhi:Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellectar: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Jagannath:Merck & Co.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Rifkin:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Terebelo:Celgene: Honoraria; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau; Newland Medical Asociates: Employment. Omel:Celgene, Takeda, Janssen: Other: Patient Advisory Committees. Hardin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline plc: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:TechData: Consultancy. Dhalla:Celgene: Employment. Catamero:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Abonour:BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Characterization of Real World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Older Adults with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Pre Novel-Agents Era: An Analysis of the 2007-2013 SEER-Medicare Database

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4773.4773 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4773-4773 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Anthony R. Mato ◽

Jordan Jahnke ◽

Pengxiang Li ◽

Maneesha Mehra ◽

Vrushabh P Ladage ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Initiation ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Novel Agents ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia among adults in Western countries with a median age of 72 years at diagnosis. Data from recent randomized clinical trials of novel agents, such as ibrutinib, have shown significant improvements in overall survival (OS) among older CLL patients. Prior to the introduction of kinase inhibitor therapies, chemoimmunotherapy combinations were the mainstay treatment. However, older individuals and/or those with co-morbid conditions may be less likely to tolerate standard CLL chemoimmunotherapy. While we await real-world outcomes data on how novel agents have continued to change the CLL landscape, little is known about the management and survival among older CLL patients prior to the availability of novel agents in clinical practice. Our study uses comprehensive prescription and medical insurance claims linked with registry data to describe the time to treatment initiation, front line therapy, and survival outcomes in older adults with CLL between 2007-2013--an era that predates the approvals of ibrutinib, idelalisib and obinutuzumab. Methods: The study used the 2007 to 2013 SEER-Medicare linked database. The sample included patients with first primary tumor site as CLL or SLL (ICD-O histology codes 9670 and 9823) diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. This date of first diagnosis of CLL or SLL defines the index date. Patients aged > 65 years with Medicare fee-for-service coverage in the 12 months pre-index and Medicare fee-for-service and prescription drug coverage in the 6-months post-index period or until death were included. Study outcomes included time to first treatment since CLL/SLL diagnosis, type of treatment initiated, and OS since first treatment. The first treatment type was classified into 6 groups (rituximab monotherapy, chlorambucil monotherapy, rituximab + bendamustine, rituximab + fludarabine +/- other treatment, rituximab + other chemotherapy, and other chemotherapy without rituximab). Logistic regression examined factors associated with receiving any treatment within 1- and 2-years of diagnosis. Cox regression examined factors associated with OS. Covariates in both sets of models included age, gender, race, region, low-income subsidy status, anemia/thrombocytopenia at diagnosis, comorbidities, disability status, and year of diagnosis. Cox regressions also included covariates for time to treatment and type of first treatment. Results: We identified 3,214 newly diagnosed CLL/SLL patients. Our sample had a mean age of 78 years (SD: 8), 49% were male, and 30% had anemia and/or thrombocytopenia at diagnosis. Nearly 33% of the patients received at least one CLL treatment over a median follow-up of 1,099 days (IQR: 834-1735 days) from the date of diagnosis. The most common treatments were rituximab monotherapy (26%), fludarabine + rituximab +/- other treatment (23%), and chlorambucil monotherapy (16%). Among those who initiated treatment, the median time to initiation was 791 days (IQR: 127-1344 days) from diagnosis. Logistic regressions indicated that patients aged 75-79 years old (vs. 80+ year olds) and those with anemia and/or thrombocytopenia at diagnosis were significantly more likely to initiate treatment within 1- and 2-years of diagnosis. The median OS from treatment initiation among the 1,047 treated patients was 52.4 months (Figure 1). The estimated 1-year and 2-year OS since treatment initiation was 81% and 69%, respectively. The OS at 2 years was 68% for rituximab monotherapy, 73% for fludarabine + rituximab +/- other treatment, and 59% for chlorambucil monotherapy. Cox regressions showed older age, male gender, disability, higher comorbidity scores, and type of first treatment (chlorambucil monotherapy vs. rituximab as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapies) to be significantly associated with lower OS. Discussion: About one-third of older individuals who were newly diagnosed with CLL initiated treatment over a median follow-up of 3 years. This real world study shows modest 2-year OS in older CLL patients after initiating treatment in the pre-novel therapy era. While available clinical trials suggest novel CLL agents offer significant improvements in survival for older adults with CLL, future studies should examine CLL outcomes in real world settings to correlate how results obtained in recent landmark clinical trials translate into clinical practice. Disclosures Mato: Abbvie, Acerta Pharma, Gilead Sciences, ProNAi, TG Therapeutics, Theradex: Research Funding; Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Pharmacyclics, TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. Mehra:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahler:Janssen Research & Development: Employment. Huntington:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Oncosec Medical: Equity Ownership; Geron: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Exelixis: Equity Ownership. Doshi:Pfizer Inc.: Other: Spouse owns stock in company, Research Funding; Forest Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; PhRMA: Research Funding; National Pharmaceutical Council: Research Funding; Humana: Research Funding; Merck & Co., Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Spouse owns stock; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alkermes: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Northstar-2: Updated Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Lentiglobin Gene Therapy in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia and Non-β0/β0 Genotypes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126046 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3543-3543 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alexis A. Thompson ◽

Mark C. Walters ◽

Janet L. Kwiatkowski ◽

Suradej Hongeng ◽

John B. Porter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Therapy ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) is treated with regular, lifelong red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and despite iron-chelating therapy, carries a risk of serious organ damage from iron overload and other complications. Transplantation with autologous CD34+ cells encoding a βA-T87Q-globin gene (LentiGlobin for β-thalassemia) is being evaluated in patients with TDT. Interim results are presented here from the ongoing, international, single-arm, phase 3 Northstar-2 study (HGB-207; NCT02906202) of LentiGlobin gene therapy in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with TDT (defined by receiving ≥100 mL/kg/yr of RBCs or ≥8 RBC transfusions/yr) and non-β0/β0 genotypes. Methods Patients undergo hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor. Following apheresis, CD34+ cells are transduced with BB305 lentiviral vector and infused into patients after pharmacokinetic-adjusted, single-agent busulfan myeloablation. The primary efficacy endpoint is transfusion independence (TI; weighted average hemoglobin [Hb] ≥9 g/dL without RBC transfusions for ≥12 months). HSC engraftment, βA-T87Q-globin expression, Hb levels, detection of replication competent lentivirus (RCL), and adverse events (AE) are also assessed. Patients are followed for 2 years and offered participation in a long-term follow-up study. Summary statistics are presented as median (min - max). Results Twenty patients were treated in Northstar-2 as of 13 December 2018 and have been followed for a median of 8.1 (0.5 - 22.2) months. At enrollment, median age was 16 (8 - 34) years; 5 patients were <12 years of age. Median drug product cell dose was 8.0 (5.0 - 19.9) x106 cells/kg and vector copy number was 3.2 (1.9 - 5.6) copies/diploid genome. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in the 18/20 and 15/20 evaluable patients was 22.5 (13 - 32) and 45 (20 - 84) days, respectively. Non-hematologic grade ≥3 AEs in ≥3 patients after LentiGlobin infusion included stomatitis (n=12), febrile neutropenia (n=6), pyrexia (n=4), epistaxis (n=3), and veno-occlusive liver disease (n=3). One serious AE of grade 3 thrombocytopenia was considered possibly related to LentiGlobin. No patient died, had graft failure, or had detection of RCL. No insertional oncogenesis has been observed. Gene therapy-derived HbAT87Q stabilized approximately 6 months after infusion. In adolescent and adult patients treated with LentiGlobin, median HbAT87Q at Months 6, 12 and 18 was 9.5 (n=11), 9.2 (n=8), and 9.5 (n=3) g/dL, respectively. The median total Hb without transfusions at Months 6, 12, and 18 were 11.9 (n=11), 12.4 (n=8), 12.3 (n=2) g/dL, respectively. At Month 6, 91% (10/11) of patients had total Hb of >11 g/dL without transfusions. Five adolescent and adult patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint of transfusion independence, 4 (80%) of whom achieved TI. The median weighted average Hb during TI was 12.4 (11.5 - 12.6) g/dL which compared favorably to pre-transfusion nadir Hb levels before enrollment (median 9.1 g/dL [7.5 - 10.0 g/dL]). At time of analysis, the median duration of TI was 13.6 (12.0 - 18.2) months. One patient who did not achieve TI stopped transfusions for 11.4 months but resumed transfusions due to recurrent anemia. This patient had a 71.4% reduction in RBC transfusion volume from Month 6 to Month 18 compared to baseline. Marrow cellularity and myeloid:erythroid (M:E) ratios were evaluated in 8 adolescent and adult patients with ≥12 months follow-up to assess the effect of LentiGlobin treatment on dyserythropoiesis. Seven of 8 patients had improved marrow M:E ratios at Month 12 (0.63 - 1.90) compared with baseline (0.14 - 0.48). In patients who stopped transfusions, soluble transferrin receptor levels were reduced by a median of 72% (58% - 78%) at Month 12 (n=6). Updated outcomes in adolescents and adults and outcomes in pediatric patients will be reported. Summary In this update of the Northstar-2 study of LentiGlobin gene therapy in patients with TDT and non-β0/β0 genotypes, transfusion independence was observed in 4/5 evaluable adolescent and adults and 10/11 treated patients had total Hb of >11 g/dL without transfusion support 6 months after LentiGlobin infusion. HbAT87Q stabilized approximately 6 months after treatment and patients who stopped RBC transfusions had improved erythropoiesis. A safety profile consistent with busulfan conditioning was observed after LentiGlobin gene therapy. Disclosures Thompson: bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding. Walters:TruCode: Consultancy; AllCells, Inc: Consultancy; Editas Medicine: Consultancy. Kwiatkowski:bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Terumo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Imara: Consultancy; Apopharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Porter:Protagonism: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; La Jolla: Honoraria; Vifor: Honoraria; Silence therapeutics: Honoraria. Thrasher:Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orchard Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generation Bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 4BIOCapital: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thuret:BlueBird bio: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Celgene: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Novartis: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Apopharma: Consultancy. Elliot:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tao:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Colvin:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Predictors of Early Relapse Following Initial Therapy for Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2082.2082 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2082-2082

Author(s):

Nidhi Tandon ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Relapse ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder that is characterized by tissue deposits of misfolded insoluble κ or λ light chain derived amyloid fibrils, leading to organ dysfunction. The prognosis of patients depends on the number and severity of organ involvement, especially cardiac involvement. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), if eligible, alkylator (melphalan) and novel drugs like proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulators (IMiD) have improved the overall survival (OS) during the past decades. But still, nearly half of the patients die within a year of diagnosis. We analyzed the factors predicting early relapse / progression or death (within 12 months) after first line therapy for systemic AL amyloidosis. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of all consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Patients who died within 3 months of starting the first line treatment were excluded from analysis. Early relapse (ER) was defined as relapse / progression requiring treatment change / re-institution or death within 12 months of starting first line treatment. Patients in the cohort with ER were compared with patients with a follow up of more than 12 months who had a relapse / progression beyond 12 months or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi - square and Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using Kruskal- Wallis test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression model. Results Seven hundred and eighty six patients with newly diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. Among these, 230 (29.3%) patients had ER within 12 months of starting initial therapy while 556 (70.7%) patients either relapsed after 1 year or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Baseline demographics, organ involvement and type of first line therapy are presented in Table1. The median estimated follow up for the entire cohort from start of initial therapy was 62.9 months (95% CI; 59.9, 67.3). The variables included in the univariate and multivariate analyses for factors predicting ER were age at diagnosis (≤ vs > 70 years ), revised mayo stage (I and II vs III and IV), bone marrow plasma cell percentage (BMPC; ≤ 10% vs > 10%), presence of any chromosomal abnormalities, trisomies or IgH translocations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiorgan involvement [(>1 vs 1) (heart, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, autonomic neuropathy), incorporation of ASCT in initial therapy. In univariate analysis, mayo stage (p<0.0001), multiorgan involvement (p=0.0008) and inclusion of ASCT as part of initial therapy (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with ER, while age (p=0.06), BMPC(p=0.9), FISH abnormalities (p=0.2) were not. However, in multivariate analysis, only mayo stage (III + IV vs I + II; p=0.01) and non-inclusion of ASCT in first line treatment (p=0.0001) were significantly predictive of ER. Conclusions Despite the introduction of ASCT and novel drugs, the early mortality in systemic AL amyloidosis remains high. This study demonstrates that patients with ER are older with higher prevalence of cardiac involvement and multiorgan involvement and higher Mayo stage (III and IV). Incorporation of ASCT as part of the initial therapy was associated with reduced early relapse, but it is difficult to separate the influence of the eligibility for ASCT from the effect of ASCT itself. This will help us in characterizing these patients to better understand their mechanisms of resistance to therapy and gives an insight to the type of initial therapy that benefits them. Disclosures Dispenzieri: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Toxicities and Outcomes of Ibrutinib-Treated Patients in the United States: Large Retrospective Analysis of 621 Real World Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3222.3222 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3222-3222 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Anthony R. Mato ◽

Nicole Lamanna ◽

Chaitra S. Ujjani ◽

Danielle M. Brander ◽

Brian T. Hill ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Retrospective Analysis ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Common Reason ◽

Discontinuation Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Of Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Ibrutinib (Ibr) is a kinase inhibitor (KI) indicated for treating CLL. Clinical trials that led to its approval showed that its unique side effects differ from traditional chemotherapy toxicities. We previously reported (Mato et al, ASH 2015) that intolerance was the most common reason for discontinuation of Ibr in 123 patients treated in a real world setting. Whether reasons for discontinuation reported in clinical trials mirror those encountered in the real world is unknown and has not been studied. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 621 CLL patients treated with Ibr either on clinical studies or commercially. We aimed to compare the type and frequency of toxicities reported in either setting, assess discontinuation rates, and evaluate outcomes. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, retrospective analysis included Ibr-treated CLL patients at 9 US cancer centers or the Connect® CLL Registry. We examined demographics, dosing, discontinuation rates and reasons, toxicities, and outcomes. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) (time from KI treatment to progression, death or last f/u) as determined by the Kaplan Meier method. Comparisons of outcomes data were made using the log rank (LR) test. All other comparisons were descriptive. Results: 621 patients treated with Ibr were identified. Table 1 includes available baseline characteristics stratified by line of therapy. A total of 546 (88%) patients were treated with commercial drug. Clinical trial patients were younger (median age 57 vs. 61 years), had a longer time from diagnosis to Ibr (median 85 vs. 72 months) and were more consistently initiated at 420 mg daily (100% vs. 89%). With a median f/u of 14.5 months, the Ibr discontinuation rate was estimated to be 42% (median time to Ibr discontinuation was 7 months). Reasons for discontinuation are listed in table 2. Notably, Ibr toxicity was the most common reason for discontinuation in all settings. Ibr starting dose (420 mg daily vs. < 420 mg daily) did not impact the proportion of patients who discontinued Ibr due to toxicity (51% vs. 50%). In relapsed CLL, the 5 most common Ibr-related toxicities as a reason for discontinuation included: atrial fibrillation (12.3%), infection (10.7%), pneumonitis (9.9%), bleeding (9%), and diarrhea (6.6%). In front line CLL, the 3 most common Ibr-related toxicities as a reason for discontinuation included arthralgia (41.6%), atrial fibrillation (25%), and rash (16.7%). Median times to discontinuation by toxicity were as follows: bleeding (8 months), diarrhea (7.5 months), atrial fibrillation (7 months), infection (6 months), arthralgia (5 months), pneumonitis (4.5 months), and rash (3.5 months). Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached (median f/u 17 months) respectively. Figure 1 describes PFS for Ibr treated patients stratified by line of therapy (A), reason for discontinuation (B), clinical trial participation (C) and depth of response (D). In a multivariable model, complex karyotype was validated as an independent predictor of PFS (HR 1.6, CI 1.1-2.5 p=.04) but not OS (HR 1.6, CI .9-3.1 p=.1). Conclusions: In the largest reported series on Ibr-treated CLL patients, we show that 40% of patients have discontinued Ibr during this observation period. Intolerance as opposed to CLL progression or transformation was the most common reason for discontinuation. As compared to previous reports from clinical trials, the discontinuation rate appears to be higher suggesting (1) a learning curve in terms of toxicity management, (2) a higher incidence of toxicity in clinical practice, (3) or a lower threshold for discontinuation given alternative choices. Outcomes remain excellent and were not impacted by line of therapy and whether patients were treated on studies or commercially. These data strongly argue to find strategies to minimize Ibr intolerance so that efficacy can be further maximized. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mato: Abbvie, Acerta Pharma, Gilead Sciences, ProNAi, TG Therapeutics, Theradex: Research Funding; Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Pharmacyclics, TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. Lamanna:Acerta: Research Funding; TGR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; TGR Therapeutics: Research Funding. Ujjani:Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Brander:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. Howlett:Sandoz: Honoraria; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria. Skarbnik:Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Cheson:Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kiselev:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nasta:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Schuster:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Hoffman-LaRoche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Genentech: Employment. Nabhan:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Barr:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Management of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease - a Survey By the Transplant Complications Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152305 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2884-2884

Author(s):

Zinaida Peric ◽

Helene Schoemans ◽

Christophe Peczynski ◽

Christian Koenecke ◽

Ivan S. Moiseev ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Working Party ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prospective Trials ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: As there is limited evidence to guide management of patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) there is a broad variability of clinical practices. To document the current practice and assess the impact of emerging new drugs in SR-GVHD, Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP) of the EBMT performed a survey among EBMT centers that covered specific treatment decisions on first- and second-line treatment of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD). Methods: The survey was conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 among EBMT centers. A questionnaire was developed by the study authors and used for data collection. It consisted of 40 questions focused on general approach in the first-line treatment, preferred second-line treatment in SR-GVHD and ancillary care in aGVHD and cGVHD. Results: 145 centers from 33 countries agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire. First-line treatment of aGVHD was reported as rather homogenous; with most centers (68%) starting with lower doses of corticosteroids (CS) (<2mg/kg) in lower grade aGVHD (grade 2a) and most centers (88%) starting with higher doses (2mg/kg) in aGVHD grades >2b. On the other hand, the evaluation of response to CS was more heterogeneous: at 3 days in 33%, at 5 days in 30%, at 7 days in 15% of centers and depending on severity of aGVHD in most other centers. In the presence of SR-aGVHD, 50% of centers consider inclusion of patients in clinical trials. Although as much as 85% of centers reported to have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SR-aGVHD management, only 45% (n=66) have an established one or 2-agent second-line treatment; most frequently ruxolitinib (n=46) and/or extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) (n=29). All other centers reported a very heterogeneous practice and listed multiple agents (range, 3-10) as second-line treatment options. In total, the most used agents for SR-aGVHD as shown in Figure 1A are ruxolitinib in 68%, ECP in 59%, mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) in 27%, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in 25%, high-dose CS (>2mg/kg) in 15%, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in 14%, etanercept in 13%, infliximab in 11% and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in 10% of centers. Clinical practice in first-line treatment of cGVHD again appeared relatively homogeneous; 58% of centers reported to treat mild forms with topical treatment only, unless affected organs could not be reached topically. In moderate/severe cGVHD, the majority (71%) of centers start with 0.5-1mg/kg of CS, in 45% with addition of CNI, while others use higher doses of CS +/- other agents. The evaluation of response was done before 4 weeks in 41% of centers, between 5-8 weeks in 41%, while a minority performed later response assessment or based the latter on organ affection/severity. In case of SR-cGVHD, 56% of centers would consider the inclusion in clinical trials, while only 65% have a SOP on management of these patients. One third of centers (35%) has an established multidisciplinary cGVHD team. Practices for SR-cGVHD again varied significantly, with most centers reporting on the use of more than 2 agents (range, 3-13) as second-line and with most applied agents as depicted in Figure 1B; ruxolitinib and ECP in 68% of centers, CNI in 40%, MMF in 37%, rituximab in 27%, imatinib in 25%, mTOR inhibitors in 23%, ibrutinib and methotrexate (MTX) in 19%, pulse of CS in 17%, MSC in 12% and PUVA therapy in 10% of centers. Conclusions:In summary, this survey revealed a rather homogenous first-line management of aGVHD and cGVHD based on steroids in the majority of centers. However, when first-line fails, the definition of SR-GVHD remains highly variable and SR-GVHD is still treated with a seemingly "trial and error" approach as demonstrated by significant variability of clinical practices among EBMT centers for second-line treatment. However, in line with recently published prospective trials, ruxolitinib comes forth as one of the most used therapeutic modalities in both SR-aGVHD and cGVHD, together with already widely administered ECP. On the contrary, ibrutinib has not emerged as standard of care in this setting. Future efforts should be invested in finding a standardized approach in SR-GVHD by directly comparing most applied second-line agents in prospective trials as well as evidence-based personalized treatment approaches. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Peric: Therakos, Servier, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer: Honoraria. Schoemans: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees , Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants and personal fees; Gilead: Other: travel grants; CIBMTR: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants and personal fees , Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees; Takeda: Other: personal fees. Koenecke: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy. Basak: Saventic Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Greinix: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Therakos: Consultancy. Penack: Omeros: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Priothera: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Therakos: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Overall Survival Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Newly Diagnosed with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130973 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3492-3492

Author(s):

Anne Shah ◽

Allison Petrilla ◽

Mayvis Rebeira ◽

Joseph Feliciano ◽

Thomas W. LeBlanc ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Brentuximab Vedotin ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Fee For Service ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Medicare Beneficiaries ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare and heterogeneous group of lymphoid malignancies characterized by a clinically aggressive course with poor prognosis. A majority of PTCL patients are ≥60 years of age and typically present with advanced stage disease and multiple comorbidities. There remains no consensus standard of care for patients with most PTCL subtypes. Multi-agent chemotherapy, consisting of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or CHOP with etoposide (CHOEP), are guideline recommended options for nodal subtypes. Limited contemporary real-world data exist on the treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) of PTCL patients treated with CHOP or non-CHOP regimens in the United States before the FDA approval of brentuximab vedotin in combination with chemotherapy in November 2018 based on the ECHELON-2 trial. Objective: To evaluate treatment patterns and OS prior to the approval of brentuximab vedotin among Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries newly diagnosed with PTCL. Methods: The 100% sample of Medicare FFS claims (Parts A/B/D) was used to identify patients aged ≥65 years with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 distinct outpatient diagnosis claims for PTCL (index event) from January 2011 to December 2017. Patients were required to have a least 6 months prior and 12 months post-index continuous Medicare enrollment, and were followed until disenrollment, death, or the end of the study period, whichever occurred first. OS, defined as the time from initial episode or treatment start date to the validated date of death, was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method; patients without a death date were assumed to be alive at the time of analysis and were censored. Results: A total of 2551 Medicare FFS beneficiaries with a PTCL diagnosis met study criteria and were included for analysis. The majority of patients were white (86.9%), over half were male (52.9%), and mean age was 75 years. Patients had multiple comorbidities at diagnosis (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 4.47), including hypertension (77.3%), diabetes (32.9%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.1%). Among the 2551 patients in the study cohort, 62.4% (n=1593 of 2551) received at least one identifiable drug regimen; 25.5% of treated patients received CHOP (n=407), 3.1% CHOEP (n=50) and 71.2% (n=1134) other regimens. Of patients treated with other regimens, 37.7% (n=427) received steroids only, 22.4% (n=254) steroids with unidentifiable chemotherapy, 6.9% (n=78) cyclophosphamide, 6.2% (n=70) methotrexate, 4.6% (n=52) brentuximab vedotin, 3.6% (n=41) bendamustine, 3.5% (n=40) romidepsin, and 15.2% (n=172) other therapy combinations. Among patients who were treated with CHOP, 16.6% (n=66) received an identifiable second line of therapy (LoT), 48.7% (n=194) an unidentifiable second LoT, and the remainder (34.7%, n=138) had no evidence of further anti-cancer treatment. The median time from CHOP initiation to a subsequent LoT was 5.6 months. The mean baseline CCI score for patients treated with CHOP was 4.33 (±2.93) compared with 4.76 (±2.97) for patients treated with other therapies (p=0.0118). In patients receiving an identifiable first LoT, median OS among CHOP and non-CHOP recipients was 4.8 years (95% CI 3.0-6.1) and 4.4 years (95% CI 3.0-4.9), respectively (Table). The 5-year OS estimate was 49% in patients receiving CHOP compared with 46% for non-CHOP recipients. Conclusions: Fewer than 30% of Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with PTCL were treated with intensive chemotherapy as first LoT. Acknowledging a possible selection bias for more fit PTCL patients receiving CHOP, this group had increased OS compared with patients receiving non-CHOP therapy. However, the 5-year OS across all cohorts was less than 50%. New therapies such as brentuximab vedotin may fill the need for PTCL Medicare beneficiaries who may not be able to tolerate CHOP or CHOP-based regimens. Disclosures Shah: Avalere Health, An Inovalon Company: Employment. Petrilla:Avalere Health, An Inovalon Company: Employment. Rebeira:Seattle Genetics: Employment. Feliciano:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. LeBlanc:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Duke University: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Consultancy; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NINR/NIH: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; CareVive: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Flatiron: Consultancy; American Cancer Society: Research Funding; Heron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medtronic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy. Lisano:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease (PAOD) In Patients (Pts) Receiving Dasatinib: Experience Across Multiple Clinical Trials

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1489.1489 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1489-1489 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Philipp D. le Coutre ◽

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Francois-Xavier Mahon ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Juan Luis Steegmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Line ◽

Related Event ◽

First Line ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dasatinib Treatment

Abstract Background The introduction of BCR-ABL inhibitors revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) which is now a manageable, chronic disease. As BCR-ABL inhibitors are used more widely and for longer, some distinctly different or late occurring adverse events (AEs) have become apparent from clinical studies and literature reports (e.g. pulmonary arterial hypertension, PAOD). PAOD has been described in a varying percentage of pts receiving nilotinib across the ENESTnd phase 3 trial of nilotinib versus imatinib (1.2%) and the literature (0.5%–12.5%). Arterial thrombotic events have also been reported in pts receiving ponatinib (11%). To assess whether PAOD may be a class effect, a pooled database of over 2700 pts in clinical trials of dasatinib was assessed. Methods Bristol-Myers Squibb clinical trial safety databases were examined using specific search-terms to identify cases of PAOD or PAOD-related events based on the mapped MedDRA preferred terms. In total, 11 clinical trials of first-line (n=2) and second-line (n=9) single-agent dasatinib in pts with CML (any phase) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia were evaluated. Dasatinib 100 mg once daily (QD) was received in first-line trials while doses received in second-line trials varied: 15–240 mg QD or twice daily (BID), 20 mg BID, 50 mg BID, 70 mg BID, 100 mg QD, 140 mg QD. Results Across 11 clinical trials, 2705 pts received dasatinib with a cumulative 5890 pt years exposure. 6 pts (0.2%) were identified with either PAOD (n=1) or a PAOD-related event (n=5). See Table for details. In the dasatinib and imatinib arms of the phase 3 DASISION study (the only study with an imatinib control arm using the standard 400 mg QD dose) no cases of PAOD or related events were identified. For the 6 pts receiving dasatinib with PAOD or a related event the median age was 67.5 years (range: 54.0–80.0). All pts received dasatinib following imatinib resistance (n=4) or intolerance (n=2) after 20.0 months median duration of prior imatinib therapy (range: 2.4 – 53.1). Pts received dasatinib treatment for a median of 39.1 months (range: 9.9 – 74.4); 5/6 received a starting dose of 70 mg BID. All of the 6 PAOD or related events were grade 3 or lower in severity; no grade 4 or serious AEs were reported. None of the 6 pts discontinued dasatinib due to PAOD or a related event. Dose interruptions occurred in 2/6 pts; the remaining pts continued to receive dasatinib. All pts had risk factors for PAOD including cardiovascular events (n=3) such as coronary/ischemic heart disease, tricuspid regurgitation, hypertension, and heart failure; endocrine/metabolic events (n=2) such as obesity and diabetes mellitus; or other events such as hyperlipidemia (n=1). 3/6 pts were or had been smokers. PAOD or related events were newly diagnosed in 5/6 pts; 1 pt with femoral artery occlusion had a prior history of right leg angioplasty indicating a preexisting condition (pt 5 in the Table). Common concomitant medications included acetylsalicylic acid (n=3) and erythropoietin (n=3). Conclusion The incidence of PAOD in pts receiving dasatinib is low and as expected for the target population. In the dasatinib clinical trials assessed here, PAOD occurred in pts who had received prior imatinib treatment and had significant predisposing risk factors for PAOD. These results suggest that PAOD is most likely not an effect of dasatinib treatment. In conclusion, confronting possible vascular AEs, pt baseline risk factors, AE profiles, and off-target profiles of therapeutic alternatives should be considered individually when choosing the most appropriate BCR-ABL inhibitor. Disclosures: le Coutre: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Hughes:Ariad: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mahon:Ariad: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Ilyang: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Support for travel to meetings Other. Steegmann:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wallis:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Cortes:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Tragara: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ambit: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Download Full-text