scholarly journals What Are the Most Important Symptoms and Concerns of Patients with Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma? Content Validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFLymSI-18)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4792-4792
Author(s):  
Karen Kaiser ◽  
Sara Shaunfield ◽  
Kimberly Webster ◽  
Karen Keating ◽  
Lara Boyken ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims: Although indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) may occur without symptoms, the presence of symptoms often provides an important signal of disease activity and may negatively affect quality of life. Thus, valid measures of disease symptoms are important for clinical trials and patient care. We aimed to assess whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFLymSI-18) addresses a representative set of iNHL symptoms, treatment side effects, and emotional concerns. Methods: Eligible patients had a confirmed iNHL diagnosis and had received one or more lines of treatment. Patients were recruited during clinic visits; informed consent was obtained from interested patients. Data were collected via face-to-face semi-structured interviews in which patients described their symptoms, treatment side effects, and emotional concerns related to iNHL. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo10 and results were mapped to the NFLymSI-18 to assess content validity. Patient and expert input from the development of the NFLymSI-18 and literature on iNHL symptoms were reviewed to further inform the content validity assessment. Results: Data saturation was obtained by the 18th interview. Mean age of the 18 participants was 66.8 years (range 49-85). Fifty-six percent of the sample was male. Most participants (66.7%) had a college or advanced degree. When asked to describe their iNHL symptoms, patients most often discussed swelling (n=14), fatigue (n=12), and pain (n=8). The following symptoms were also mentioned by three patients each: anxiety, appetite loss, rash, sleep disruption, trouble breathing, and malaise. Treatment side effects spontaneously mentioned most often were fatigue (N=10), nausea (n=9), hair loss (N=8), cognitive problems (N=6), and weight loss (N=6). Emotional responses frequently mentioned included gratitude for life (N=11), worry (N=11), and feeling down (N=8). Mapping of NFLymSI-18 content to these patient concerns showed the instrument includes all of the most frequently-mentioned concerns. Some less frequently-mentioned concerns (i.e., rash, trouble breathing, malaise, fevers, hair loss, feeling down) are not covered by the instrument. Conclusion and Summary: Patients with iNHL reported a wide range of disease related symptoms; however, swelling, fatigue and pain were most common. This study supports the representativeness of existing NFLymSI-18 items for patients with iNHL. In particular, the instrument shows strong validity for the most commonly referenced patient symptoms. The diversity of additional symptoms reported by patients is consistent with the heterogeneous symptomology of iNHL. These less-frequently-endorsed symptoms, side effects, and emotional concerns, could be added to the NFLymSI-18 if one wished to have a more inclusive assessment of concerns associated with iNHL. Disclosures Keating: Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Cella:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Facit.org: Other: President; Alexion, Inc., Astellas, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Evidera, Inc., Exelixis, Fiborgen, Genetech, Helsinn Therapeutics, Inc., Immunogen, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck, Novartis, Onc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ijaz Masood ◽  
RABEETA SHEIKH ◽  
RANA ATIQUE ANWER

Objective: The aim of study was to assess the effect of Biobran in reducing of chemotherapy induced side effects in termsof tiredness, anorexia, vomiting and hair loss and quality of life in terms of weight loss. Setting: Radiotherapy Department, NishtarHospital Multan. Material and Methods: Fifty patients of breast cancer were enrolled randomly in two groups. Group-A patients weregiven 3 gram dose of Biobran MGN-3 per day one week before and one week after chemotherapy. Group-B patient were givenchemotherapy alone. Total six cycles of chemotherapy were given. No multivitamin or food supplements were given during this study.Chemotherapy induced side effects (tiredness, anorexia, and vomiting, hair loss) were assessed by questionnaire to the patients beforestart of each cycle. Weight was checked before each cycle to assess weight gain or loss. White blood cells were checked by completeblood count just before and one week after chemotherapy. Results: Between six months, 50 patients were enrolled in RadiotherapyDepartment, Nishtar Hospital Multan. There was a significant reduction in tiredness and anorexia in group-A patients. 20 (80%) patients ofgroup-A felt increase in their diet and no tiredness without any appetizer or multivitamin. But group-B patients demanded for appetizer dueto severe anorexia after chemotherapy except 3 (12%) patients who didn’t use any appetizer or food supplement. In group-A, 15 (60%)patients didn’t need any anti-emetic as compared to group-B all patient (100%) experienced severe nausea during and afterchemotherapy. Group-A patients experienced less hair fall 7 (28%) patients as compared to other group which is 25 (100%) patients.Conclusions: The study showed that, by helping to optimize the immune system, Biobran MGN-3 can not only help maximize treatmentsuccess, but also minimize treatment side effects and improve quality of life during treatment and in recovery.


2005 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen J. Yost ◽  
Susan E. Yount ◽  
David T. Eton ◽  
Cheryl Silberman ◽  
Anne Broughton-Heyes ◽  
...  

Clinics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 1247-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franceschini Juliana ◽  
José R. Jardim ◽  
Ana Luisa Godoy Fernandes ◽  
Sérgio Jamnik ◽  
Ilka Lopes Santoro

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20527-e20527
Author(s):  
Susan Yount ◽  
Karen Kaiser ◽  
Jennifer L Beaumont ◽  
Kimberly Webster ◽  
Lynne I. Wagner ◽  
...  

e20527 Background: Anti-angiogenesis therapies represent a significant and promising advancement in cancer treatment. Side effects from angiogenesis inhibitors, although generally milder than chemotherapy side effects, have the potential to impact Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation. Currently, there are no patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures that specifically assess HRQOL related to anti-angiogenesis therapy. This study describes the development and validation of a PRO questionnaire for anti-angiogenesis therapy, the FACT-AntiA. Methods: Scale development included identification of 59 anti-angiogenesis side effects from the literature and clinician and patient input. Patient and clinician ratings of the importance of these side effects led to the development of a 24-item scale. Cognitive interviews with 10 patients confirmed item wording and meaning. To assess psychometric properties of the scale, 132 kidney cancer patients completed the FACT-AntiA and other PRO measures including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Cancer Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19), and PROMIS Global Health at 3 time points. Patient responses to the FACT-AntiA were analyzed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change in clinical status. Results: FACT-AntiA side-effect subscales scores and total score were found to have good internal consistency reliability (most Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70). Test-retest reliability was greater than 0.70 for most subscales and individual items. All single items (except nosebleeds), subscales, and the total score significantly differentiated between groups defined by level of side effect bother. Conclusions: The number of patients who reported a change in their side effect bother was small so evaluation of FACT-AntiA responsiveness to change requires further study. The FACT-AntiA was developed and validated as a tool to enhance treatment decision-making and side effect management for patients receiving anti-angiogenesis therapies and is a reliable and valid index for evaluation of therapy side effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document