Use and Interpretation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Symptom Indexes in Palliative Research and Treatment: Special Considerations in Ovarian Cancer

Author(s):  
Sally E Jensen
Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4792-4792
Author(s):  
Karen Kaiser ◽  
Sara Shaunfield ◽  
Kimberly Webster ◽  
Karen Keating ◽  
Lara Boyken ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims: Although indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) may occur without symptoms, the presence of symptoms often provides an important signal of disease activity and may negatively affect quality of life. Thus, valid measures of disease symptoms are important for clinical trials and patient care. We aimed to assess whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFLymSI-18) addresses a representative set of iNHL symptoms, treatment side effects, and emotional concerns. Methods: Eligible patients had a confirmed iNHL diagnosis and had received one or more lines of treatment. Patients were recruited during clinic visits; informed consent was obtained from interested patients. Data were collected via face-to-face semi-structured interviews in which patients described their symptoms, treatment side effects, and emotional concerns related to iNHL. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo10 and results were mapped to the NFLymSI-18 to assess content validity. Patient and expert input from the development of the NFLymSI-18 and literature on iNHL symptoms were reviewed to further inform the content validity assessment. Results: Data saturation was obtained by the 18th interview. Mean age of the 18 participants was 66.8 years (range 49-85). Fifty-six percent of the sample was male. Most participants (66.7%) had a college or advanced degree. When asked to describe their iNHL symptoms, patients most often discussed swelling (n=14), fatigue (n=12), and pain (n=8). The following symptoms were also mentioned by three patients each: anxiety, appetite loss, rash, sleep disruption, trouble breathing, and malaise. Treatment side effects spontaneously mentioned most often were fatigue (N=10), nausea (n=9), hair loss (N=8), cognitive problems (N=6), and weight loss (N=6). Emotional responses frequently mentioned included gratitude for life (N=11), worry (N=11), and feeling down (N=8). Mapping of NFLymSI-18 content to these patient concerns showed the instrument includes all of the most frequently-mentioned concerns. Some less frequently-mentioned concerns (i.e., rash, trouble breathing, malaise, fevers, hair loss, feeling down) are not covered by the instrument. Conclusion and Summary: Patients with iNHL reported a wide range of disease related symptoms; however, swelling, fatigue and pain were most common. This study supports the representativeness of existing NFLymSI-18 items for patients with iNHL. In particular, the instrument shows strong validity for the most commonly referenced patient symptoms. The diversity of additional symptoms reported by patients is consistent with the heterogeneous symptomology of iNHL. These less-frequently-endorsed symptoms, side effects, and emotional concerns, could be added to the NFLymSI-18 if one wished to have a more inclusive assessment of concerns associated with iNHL. Disclosures Keating: Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Cella:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Facit.org: Other: President; Alexion, Inc., Astellas, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Evidera, Inc., Exelixis, Fiborgen, Genetech, Helsinn Therapeutics, Inc., Immunogen, Ipsen Pharma, Janssen, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck, Novartis, Onc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (26) ◽  
pp. 2841-2847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexi A. Wright ◽  
Angel Cronin ◽  
Dana E. Milne ◽  
Michael A. Bookman ◽  
Robert A. Burger ◽  
...  

Purpose A 2006 randomized trial demonstrated a 16-month survival benefit with intraperitoneal and intravenous (IP/IV) chemotherapy administered to patients who had ovarian cancer, compared with IV chemotherapy alone, but more treatment-related toxicities. The objective of this study was to examine the use and effectiveness of IP/IV chemotherapy in clinical practice. Patients and Methods Prospective cohort study of 823 women with stage III, optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer diagnosed at six National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions. We examined IP/IV chemotherapy use in all patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 (N = 823), and overall survival and treatment-related toxicities with Cox regression and logistic regression, respectively, in a propensity score–matched sample (n = 402) of patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2012, excluding trial participants, to minimize selection bias. Results Use of IP/IV chemotherapy increased from 0% to 33% between 2003 and 2006, increased to 50% from 2007 to 2008, and plateaued thereafter. Between 2006 and 2012, adoption of IP/IV chemotherapy varied by institution from 4% to 67% (P < .001) and 43% of patients received modified IP/IV regimens at treatment initiation. In the propensity score–matched sample, IP/IV chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved overall survival (3-year overall survival, 81% v 71%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.99), compared with IV chemotherapy, but also more frequent alterations in chemotherapy delivery route (adjusted rates discontinuation or change, 20.4% v 10.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.47 to 5.47). Conclusion Although the use of IP/IV chemotherapy increased significantly at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers between 2003 and 2012, fewer than 50% of eligible patients received it. Increasing IP/IV chemotherapy use in clinical practice may be an important and underused strategy to improve ovarian cancer outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document