scholarly journals Von Willebrand Disease Screening in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 674-674
Author(s):  
Amanda E. Jacobson ◽  
Sara K. Vesely ◽  
Terah Koch ◽  
Janis Campbell ◽  
Sarah H. O'Brien

Abstract Background Bleeding disorders in women are under-recognized and under-treated. Women are equally as likely as men to have bleeding disorders other than hemophilia and are disproportionately affected by these diseases due to the bleeding challenges of menstruation and childbirth. The most common bleeding disorder identified in women is von Willebrand disease (VWD). Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common symptom in women with VWD, occurring in up to 93% of patients. Among women with HMB, the reported prevalence of VWD ranges from 5─20%. Women with VWD are also more likely to be diagnosed with hemorrhagic ovarian cysts due to ovulation-associated bleeding and endometriosis due to increased retrograde menstruation. As a result, women with bleeding disorders are more likely to undergo hysterectomy and also undergo hysterectomy at an earlier age than women without bleeding disorders. In 2001, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) recommended VWD screening prior to hysterectomy in women with HMB. The actual frequency of VWD screening in clinical practice is unknown. Objectives In this study, we assess patterns of VWD screening in a nationally representative sample of women undergoing hysterectomies for HMB. Methods We used the Truven Health MarketScan® Research Databases which include the medical prescription claims of over 109 million covered lives as well as Medicaid data on 8.6 million patients from 14 states. The MarketScan Databases contain patient demographics, physician and facility claims and pharmacy claims. Procedure codes were used to identify women ages 10-44 years undergoing hysterectomy or hysterectomy alternative (HA) from 2011-2013. Subjects were required to have 12 months of continuous enrollment prior to surgery date. We utilized ICD-9 codes to categorize hysterectomy indications and only included women with a diagnosis of excessive bleeding as the indication for surgery. Women with fibroids, genital tract malignancy, and previously diagnosed bleeding disorders were excluded. We defined VWD screening as a laboratory claim for either VWF:Antigen and/or VWF:Activity within the 12 months preceding hysterectomy. To determine if patient and facility level characteristics impacted access to specialty hematology care and/or screening for VWD, we collected the following information: 1) known bleeding disorder diagnosis and/or endometriosis prior to surgery; 2) age; 3) whether patient was living in metropolitan statistical area (MSA; used as a surrogate marker for urban vs rural inhabitance); 4) number of miles and approximate travel time to nearest Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC). We used ArcMAP® software to calculate distance between the MSA and nearest HTC. MSA data was only available for commercially-insured patients. (Figure 1) Logistic regression was used to assess factors related to the occurrence of VWD screening. Results We identified 13,790 women who underwent hysterectomy/HA for HMB. We excluded 138 with known bleeding disorders leaving 13,652 women in our final analysis (Table 1). Of these, 74 (0.5%) were screened for VWD within 12 months preceding surgery. There were 2,000 women (15%) who underwent other coagulation tests, most commonly prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time. We had MSA data on 11,557 commercially-insured women, of whom 72.4% lived within a MSA. Women living in a MSA were screened more often than those outside of a MSA (p=0.013). For those living within a MSA, the odds of being screened for VWD was lower in women with endometriosis (OR=0.54, 95% CI 0.31, 0.97; p=0.038) and women living >100 miles from the nearest HTC (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.11, 0.81; p=0.017). Discussion This study demonstrated that despite ACOG expert recommendations, the frequency of VWD screening in a nationally-representative population of publically and commercially-insured women undergoing hysterectomy for HMB was very low. Greater distance from a HTC or a prior diagnosis of endometriosis further reduced the likelihood of VWD screening. It is important to increase awareness that a diagnosis of endometriosis does not rule out the presence of a bleeding disorder. This study brings to light the need for the hematology community to improve education and awareness among women's health providers in order to identify women with bleeding disorders and allow for optimal medical management of HMB prior to surgical consideration. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (01) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Halimeh

SummaryIn women, von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Since VWD and other inherited bleeding disorders are autosomal disorders, they affect women and men. Menorrhagia, or heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), is the most common symptom of women with bleeding disorder experience. Objectively, it is defined as bleeding that lasts for more than seven days or results in the loss of more than 80 ml of blood per menstrual cycle. The prevalence of menorrhagia in a woman with a bleeding disorder ranges from 32 to 100% in patients with VWD, from 5 to 98% in patients with a platelet dysfunction and from 35 to 70% in women with a rare factor deficiency. A detailed history and a careful physical exam are the first steps towards a diagnosis in adolescents, adding a PBAC > 100 increased the sensitivity of the screening tool further to 95%. Laboratory testing should be made at the time of menstrual bleeding in an effort to capture the lowest level of VWF : Ag and FVIII : C. Treatment options for menorrhagia in VWD: antifibrinolytic therapy with tranexamic acid, (2) the non-transfusional agent desmopressin (DDAVP), (3) purified blood products that contain factor VIII and VWF concentrated from plasma and (4) hormonal preparations.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Huhmann ◽  
Andrea Zuckerman

Heavy menstrual bleeding is a common presenting problem in the adolescent population. The average age of menarche is between 12 and 13 years. The most common reason for heavy menstrual bleeding soon after menarche is from an immature hypothalamic ovarian access, which spontaneously resolves once cycles become ovulatory. However, the broad differential diagnosis for heavy menses in adolescents includes coagulopathy, thyroid disease, sexually transmitted infections, specifically chlamydia, and chronic medical conditions. Von Willebrand disease is the most common bleeding disorder that can present with heavy menstrual bleeding at menarche or shortly after. A thorough history and physical exam with occasional labs needs to be completed and can assist in narrowing the differential diagnosis. Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding consists of hormonal and nonhormonal options: combination oral contraceptive pills, patches, or rings taken continuously or cyclically; progesterone-only pills; progesterone implants; progesterone intrauterine devices; cyclic tranexamic acid; cyclic aminocaproic acid; and GnRH agonists with add-back therapy. This review contains 3 tables, and 28 references. Key Words: adolescent menses, anovulation, bleeding disorder, heavy menstrual bleeding, immature hypothalamic ovarian axis, menarche, treatment of heavy menses, Von Willebrand disease


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Levine

Coagulopathy can be caused by numerous hereditary or acquired etiologies. Although some of these conditions are known and the patient is aware of the bleeding disorder, other bleeding disorders are diagnosed only after the onset of excessive hemorrhage. This review discusses both hereditary and acquired disorders of coagulopathy. Platelet disorders are discussed elsewhere. This review contains 2 figures, 7 tables, and 72 references. Key words: Coagulopathies; Coagulopathy; Bleeding disorder; Hereditary bleeding disorder; Acquired bleeding disorder; von Willebrand disease; Hemophilia; Coagulation cascade; Hemorrhage; Anticoagulant-associated hemorrhage


Haemophilia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda E. Jacobson‐Kelly ◽  
Sara K. Vesely ◽  
Terah Koch ◽  
Janis Campbell ◽  
Sarah H. O’Brien

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3399-3399
Author(s):  
Andra H James ◽  
Evan R Myers ◽  
Chad Cook ◽  
Ricardo Pietrobon

Abstract Background: Case reports and small case series suggest that women with von Willebrand disease (VWD) are at a very high risk of bleeding complications with hysterectomy. Because the procedure may be beneficial to women who suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding, an understanding of the true risks involved is essential for appropriate decision making. Objectives: To estimate the incidence of bleeding and other complications in women with VWD who undergo hysterectomy. Methods: The United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for the years 1988–2004 was queried for all hysterectomies for nonmalignant conditions. Data were analyzed based on the NIS sampling design. Bivariate analyses were used to examine the differences between women with and without VWD. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders among women who underwent hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Results: 545 of the 1,358,133 hysterectomies were to women with VWD. Women with VWD were significantly more likely to experience intraoperative and postoperative bleeding (2.75% versus 0.89%, p < 0.001) and require transfusion (7.34% versus 2.13%, p < 0.001) than women without VWD. One woman with VWD died (odds ratio = 28.49). Conclusions: While the risk of bleeding complications from hysterectomy in women with VWD is smaller than previously reported, women with VWD did experience significantly more bleeding complications than women without VWD. Nonetheless, for women who have completed childbearing, the risks of hysterectomy may be acceptable.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Genevieve Moyer ◽  
Patricia Huguelet

INTRODUCTION Women with inherited bleeding disorders of all severities often present with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during adolescence. The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH BAT) is a clinician-administered instrument that has become part of the standard initial assessment of individuals with possible bleeding diatheses and for which pediatric normal ranges have been established (Elbatarny, Haemophilila 2014). The Self-BAT is an instrument that has gained popularity due to its ability to be performed independently by the patient either on paper or electronically. While favorable intraclass correlation has been demonstrated between these tools for individuals &gt;18 years of age, the Self-BAT has not been validated in an adolescent population (Punt, HT Open 2019). We therefore sought to compare the results of the physician directed ISTH-BAT with the Self-BAT in a population of biological females &lt;20 years of age. METHODS Eligible subjects included biological females under 20 years of age seen at the University of Colorado's Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center's adolescent bleeding disorder (Spots and Dots) clinic for evaluation of HMB and assessment of either a known or suspected bleeding diathesis. Subjects were administered both an ISTH BAT and Self-BAT within a three-month period. All ISTH BATs were performed and scored by the same hematologist. Each subject used an iPad to enter data for the self-BAT which was collected into REDCap and scored by the same hematologist. Age at the time of assessment and underlying bleeding disorder diagnosis or etiology for HMB were also recorded. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's Correlation coefficient were used to compare the outcomes between the ISTH BAT and the Self-BAT. RESULTS Sixteen biological females met inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis (Table 1). Patients ranged in age from 11 to 19 years. Over 55% of subjects scored higher on the self-BAT than the ISTH BAT. On average, the self-BAT resulted in scores that were 2.5 points higher (range = -2 to 10). Subjects with identifiable inherited bleeding disorders and low VWF on average scored 3.09 points higher on the self-BAT while those with bleeding of unknown cause (BUC) or anovulatory bleeding scored on average 1.2 points higher. The difference in score would have resulted in a different classification in 2 patients (12.5%). The cutaneous (bruising) domain accounted for the largest contribution to higher self-BAT scores, followed by heavy menstrual bleeding (Figure 1). There did not appear to be a clear association between younger age and a greater difference between the two scores (r = 0.25, p = 0.36), though the number of available subjects did not allow for a powered assessment of this. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this study, we feel additional investigation is warranted to validate the tools used to screen for and confirm inherited bleeding disorders in the adolescent population of biological females with heavy menstrual bleeding. The Self-BAT may not be an optimal means of assessment in individuals under the age of 20 years and may overestimate clinical bleeding history. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1216-1216
Author(s):  
Lauren E Amos ◽  
Shannon L Carpenter

Abstract Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in adolescents can be severe and life-threatening. Up to 30% of young women who are hospitalized with anemia due to HMB have a bleeding disorder. Guidelines from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) recommend evaluation for bleeding disorders in such patients. ACOG recommendations include testing for von Willebrand disease (VWD) and specify that consultation with a hematologist may help in interpreting results. NHLBI recommends testing for vWD be done in conjunction with a hematologist. As von Willebrand factor is an acute phase reactant, testing when patients are severely anemic and bleeding may not provide accurate results. ACOG guidelines do not include testing for platelet function disorders (PFD), though PFD may be as prevalent as VWD in females with HMB. Early and accurate diagnosis of bleeding disorders is important for health and quality of life, yet limited data exists on the diagnostic evaluation for bleeding disorders in adolescent females hospitalized for HMB. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic evaluation of bleeding disorders in adolescent females hospitalized for HMB. Methods: A retrospective, single center chart review of female patients aged 9-21 years hospitalized for HMB and anemia at a tertiary care children's hospital from January 1, 2000 until December 31, 2017 was done. HMB was defined as menses ≥7 days in length, use of 8 or more pads or tampons per day during menses, pictorial bleeding assessment chart (PBAC) score greater than 100, or symptomatic anemia. Patients were identified from our Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) registry, review of patients seen at a comprehensive clinic staffed by pediatric hematologists and gynecologists for adolescent females with HMB and bleeding disorders, and by an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) query of admission and discharge diagnoses of HMB and anemia. Data obtained included clinical features, diagnostic evaluation, and laboratory results. Results: 118 patients hospitalized for HMB and anemia were included. Inpatient Hematology consult or outpatient referral occurred in 68 (58%) of the patients; 60/68 (88%) had a bleeding disorder evaluation completed. 34 patients had a hematologic disorder. PFD was the most common (15/34; 44%) followed by VWD (9/34; 26%). 42% (50/118) of the patients did not have a Hematology consult or outpatient referral (Table 1). While hospitalized for HMB and anemia, 29 of the 50 patients had testing for vWD performed and only 4/29 (14%) had testing repeated as an outpatient once hemoglobin normalized. No patients tested for VWD while inpatient had results consistent with the diagnosis. Platelet function testing was performed in 10/50 patients using the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) in 8 patients and platelet aggregometry in 2 patients. Conclusions: Despite national guidelines and the presence of known risk factors such as HMB since menarche and HMB causing severe anemia, the hematology service was not involved in the diagnostic process for a significant number of adolescent females. In these patients, testing often occurred while patients were hospitalized and was not repeated. Testing for platelet function disorders occurred infrequently and mainly consisted of the PFA-100 which lacks sensitivity and specificity. When patients were evaluated by Hematology and tested for bleeding disorders, a large proportion had a bleeding disorder, of which PFD were most common. This study demonstrates the need for standardization of the evaluation of adolescent females hospitalized for HMB. Guidelines should be updated to include testing for PFD. Hematologists should be involved when females are hospitalized for HMB and anemia. Disclosures Carpenter: Genentech Incorporated: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nationwide Children's Hospital: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Kedrion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; HEMA Biologics: Consultancy; American Academy of Pediatrics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; National Hemophilia Foundation (Impact Education): Speakers Bureau; Kane County State's Attorney: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; 4th Judicial District Attorney's Office- Colorado: Consultancy; Kedrion Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (178) ◽  
Author(s):  
AH Khosla ◽  
L Devi ◽  
P Goel ◽  
PK Saha

INTRODUCTION: Puberty menorrhagia is a significant health problem in adolescent age group and severe cases may require admission and blood transfusion. Aim of this study was to evaluate the causes, associated complications and management of puberty menorrhagia. METHODS: Hospital records of all patients of puberty menorrhagia requiring admission were analyzed for etiology, duration since menarche, duration of bleeding, investigation profile and management. RESULTS: There were 18 patients of puberty menorrhagia requiring hospital admission. Etiology was anovulatory bleeding in 11 patients, bleeding disorders in five which included idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura in three and one each with Von-Willebrand disease and leukemia. Two patients had hypothyroidism as the cause. Fourteen patients presented with severe anaemia and required blood transfusion. All except one responded to oral hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Puberty menorrhagia can be associated with severe complications and requiring blood transfusion. Although most common cause is anovulation but bleeding disorder, other medical condition and other organic causes must be ruled out in any patient of Puberty menorrhagia.KEYWORDS: anovulation, bleeding disorder, puberty, menorrhagia, anaemia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda E. Jacobson ◽  
Sara K. Vesely ◽  
Terah Koch ◽  
Janis Campbell ◽  
Sarah H. OʼBrien

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document