scholarly journals Cyclosporine v methotrexate for graft-v-host disease prevention in patients given marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of three controlled trials

Blood ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-298
Author(s):  
R Storb ◽  
HJ Deeg ◽  
L Fisher ◽  
F Appelbaum ◽  
CD Buckner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Leukemic Relapse ◽  
Acute Nonlymphoblastic Leukemia

One hundred seventy-nine patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia in first remission (n = 75), chronic myelocytic leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase (n = 48) or leukemia in advanced stage (n = 56) were given HLA-identical marrow grafts and randomized to receive methotrexate or cyclosporine for prevention of graft-v-host disease (GVHD). The current report updates the three prospective trials with follow-ups ranging from 3.2 to 6.2 years after marrow grafting. Results were analyzed separately for each individual study and for all three studies combined. Overall, 40% of patients given cyclosporine and 55% of those given methotrexate developed acute GVHD (P = .13); the incidence of chronic GVHD was 42% and 48%, respectively (P = .67). Twenty-two percent of cyclosporine-treated patients and 30% of methotrexate-treated patients developed interstitial pneumonia of any etiology (P = .25), and the figures for cytomegalovirus pneumonia were 18% and 20%, respectively (P = .41). The overall incidence of leukemic relapse was 31% in cyclosporine-treated patients and 36% in methotrexate-treated patients (P = .75). The probabilities of survival for cyclosporine-v methotrexate-treated patients were comparable for all three study groups: 52% v 48% in patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia (P = .42), 55% v 60% for those with chronic myelocytic leukemia (P = .61), 12% and 12% for those with advanced leukemia (P = .93), and 39% v 38% overall (P = .72). We conclude that cyclosporine and methotrexate are comparable regarding the likelihood of acute/chronic GVHD, interstitial pneumonia, leukemic relapse, and long-term survival.

scholarly journals Cyclosporine v methotrexate for graft-v-host disease prevention in patients given marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of three controlled trials

Blood ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Storb ◽  
HJ Deeg ◽  
L Fisher ◽  
F Appelbaum ◽  
CD Buckner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Leukemic Relapse ◽  
Acute Nonlymphoblastic Leukemia

Abstract One hundred seventy-nine patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia in first remission (n = 75), chronic myelocytic leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase (n = 48) or leukemia in advanced stage (n = 56) were given HLA-identical marrow grafts and randomized to receive methotrexate or cyclosporine for prevention of graft-v-host disease (GVHD). The current report updates the three prospective trials with follow-ups ranging from 3.2 to 6.2 years after marrow grafting. Results were analyzed separately for each individual study and for all three studies combined. Overall, 40% of patients given cyclosporine and 55% of those given methotrexate developed acute GVHD (P = .13); the incidence of chronic GVHD was 42% and 48%, respectively (P = .67). Twenty-two percent of cyclosporine-treated patients and 30% of methotrexate-treated patients developed interstitial pneumonia of any etiology (P = .25), and the figures for cytomegalovirus pneumonia were 18% and 20%, respectively (P = .41). The overall incidence of leukemic relapse was 31% in cyclosporine-treated patients and 36% in methotrexate-treated patients (P = .75). The probabilities of survival for cyclosporine-v methotrexate-treated patients were comparable for all three study groups: 52% v 48% in patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia (P = .42), 55% v 60% for those with chronic myelocytic leukemia (P = .61), 12% and 12% for those with advanced leukemia (P = .93), and 39% v 38% overall (P = .72). We conclude that cyclosporine and methotrexate are comparable regarding the likelihood of acute/chronic GVHD, interstitial pneumonia, leukemic relapse, and long-term survival.

scholarly journals Marrow transplantation for chronic myelocytic leukemia: a controlled trial of cyclosporine versus methotrexate for prophylaxis of graft- versus-host disease

Blood ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 698-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Storb ◽  
HJ Deeg ◽  
ED Thomas ◽  
FR Appelbaum ◽  
CD Buckner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
Total Body

Forty-eight patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia, aged 11 to 47, were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation, followed by infusion of marrow from HLA-identical siblings. They were randomized to receive either methotrexate (MTX) (n = 23) or cyclosporine (CSP) (n = 25) as postgrafting prophylaxis for graft-v-host disease (GVHD). All patients had evidence of sustained hematopoietic engraftment. Seventeen of the 25 patients receiving CSP and 17 of the 23 patients receiving MTX are alive between one and almost four (median, 1.7) years, with an actuarial survival rate at three years of 62% and 66%, respectively (P = .60). Also, with respect to most other parameters studied, the two drugs were identical. The probability of acute GVHD was .42 and .46, respectively (P = .70), that of chronic GVHD, .50 and .63 (P = .44), and that of death from transplant-related causes, .30 and .24 (P = .51). There were no differences in the speed of granulocyte and platelet engraftment (P = .82 and .94, respectively), and the duration of hospitalization was comparable (P = .58). Patients receiving MTX required red cell transfusions for a shorter period of time (P = .02), but had a slightly increased morbidity from early oral mucositis. The leukemia recurrence rates were comparable (P = .60). With the regimens used in this study, we conclude that CSP failed to reduce the incidence of GVHD and improve the survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia when compared to results with standard MTX.

scholarly journals In vivo administration of interleukin 2 plus T cell-depleted syngeneic marrow prevents graft-versus-host disease mortality and permits alloengraftment.

1990 ◽  
Vol 171 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sykes ◽  
M L Romick ◽  
K A Hoyles ◽  
D H Sachs
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Protective Effect ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Disease Mortality

Previous work from this laboratory has demonstrated that T cell-depleted (TCD) syngeneic marrow can delay, but not prevent, the mortality from acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) caused by MHC-mismatched lymphoid cells administered to lethally irradiated mice. We demonstrate here that a protective effect against GVHD is also observed after in vivo treatment with IL-2. Administration of 10,000-50,000 U of IL-2 twice daily for the first 5 d after bone marrow transplantation markedly reduced the mortality from both acute and chronic GVHD induced across complete MHC barriers in lethally irradiated mice, and frequently led to long-term survival. Complete allogeneic reconstitution was demonstrated in all long-term survivors of this treatment regimen. While either IL-2 or TCD syngeneic marrow administered alone was protective in some experiments, the maximal protective effect was observed after administration of both IL-2 and TCD syngeneic marrow, especially when the effects of IL-2 were suboptimal. The timing of IL-2 administration was critical to this beneficial effect, since a delay of 7 d in commencing IL-2 treatment was associated with accelerated GVHD mortality. This new approach to the prevention of GVHD permits the administration of allogeneic T cells, and may therefore avoid the increased incidence of graft failure and loss of antileukemic effects associated with the T cell depletion of allogeneic marrow, which is otherwise required for the prevention of GVHD.

scholarly journals Marrow transplantation for chronic myelocytic leukemia: a controlled trial of cyclosporine versus methotrexate for prophylaxis of graft- versus-host disease

Blood ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 698-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Storb ◽  
HJ Deeg ◽  
ED Thomas ◽  
FR Appelbaum ◽  
CD Buckner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Actuarial Survival ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Myelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Forty-eight patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia, aged 11 to 47, were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation, followed by infusion of marrow from HLA-identical siblings. They were randomized to receive either methotrexate (MTX) (n = 23) or cyclosporine (CSP) (n = 25) as postgrafting prophylaxis for graft-v-host disease (GVHD). All patients had evidence of sustained hematopoietic engraftment. Seventeen of the 25 patients receiving CSP and 17 of the 23 patients receiving MTX are alive between one and almost four (median, 1.7) years, with an actuarial survival rate at three years of 62% and 66%, respectively (P = .60). Also, with respect to most other parameters studied, the two drugs were identical. The probability of acute GVHD was .42 and .46, respectively (P = .70), that of chronic GVHD, .50 and .63 (P = .44), and that of death from transplant-related causes, .30 and .24 (P = .51). There were no differences in the speed of granulocyte and platelet engraftment (P = .82 and .94, respectively), and the duration of hospitalization was comparable (P = .58). Patients receiving MTX required red cell transfusions for a shorter period of time (P = .02), but had a slightly increased morbidity from early oral mucositis. The leukemia recurrence rates were comparable (P = .60). With the regimens used in this study, we conclude that CSP failed to reduce the incidence of GVHD and improve the survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia when compared to results with standard MTX.

scholarly journals Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen before T-Cell Replete Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Advanced Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4614-4614
Author(s):  
Catalina Montes De Oca ◽  
Thomas Pagliardini ◽  
Stefania Bramanti ◽  
Sabine Furst ◽  
Jean Marc Schiano de Collela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Low Incidence

Introduction: allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment for patients with advanced lymphoma. Haploidentical (haplo-SCT) transplantation extended the accessibility to allo-HSCT, overcoming the issue of donor availability. However, alternative donor allo-HSCT is still considered at higher risk of non-relapse mortality due to the HLA disparity and thus an anticipated higher incidence of GVHD. In this context, the use of a non myeloablative conditioning (NMAC) regimen combined with post transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) based GVHD prophylaxis may reduce procedure related toxicity. The aim was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of haplo-SCT using NMAC with PT-Cy in advanced lymphoma patients. Methods: We here report the retrospective experience of a bicentric transplantation program. We analyzed a cohort of lymphoma patients undergoing Haplo-SCT and homogeneously receiving NMAC and PT-Cy. Inclusion criteria were: 1) first allo-HSCT for advanced lymphoma between 2009 and 2018; 2) haploidentical donor; 3) NMAC (fludarabine cyclophosphamide and 2 gray TBI GVHD prophylaxis consisted of PT-Cy day+3 and +4 , cyclosporine A and MMF starting from day +5. Multivariate analyses included age, disease type (NHL vs HL), HCT-CI (< vs ≥ 3), graft source (PBSC vs BM), disease status at haplo-SCT (CR vs other). Results: One hundred forty seven patients (73 NHL; 74 HL) with a median age of 46 years (range: 19-71) were included. PBSC (peripheral blood stem cell) was used as graft source in 96 patients (65%). Patients received a median number of 3 conventional chemotherapy lines before haplo-SCT (1-8). Sixty-five (44%) had relapse after Auto-HCT. At the time of haplo-SCT, 96 patients (66%) were in complete remission. The cumulative incidences of day+100 grade 2-4 and 3-4 acute GVHD were 30% and 3%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 2-year chronic and moderate or severe chronic GVHD were 13% and 8%, respectively. With a median follow up of 39 months (6-114), 2-year NRM was 14%, with a trend for higher risk in patients with HCT-CI ≥ 3 (HR 0.39, 95CI [0.15-1.04] p = 0.061) while age was not associated with an increased risk of NRM (HR 1.01, 95CI [0.98-1.05], p = 0.450). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 21% and 18% in HL and NHL patients, respectively. Disease status at the time of haplo-SCT was strongly associated with relapse (HR 2.99, 95CI [1.41-6.35], p = 0.004) In HL patients, 2-year PFS, OS and GRFS were 65%, 77% and 57%, respectively, while corresponding values in NHL patients were 65%, 69% and 55%, respectively. Two-year PFS and GRFS were significantly higher in patients who underwent haplo-SCT in CR (PFS: CR vs. no CR: 72% vs. 55%, p=0.045; GRFS: CR vs. no CR: 63% vs. 42%, p=0.010). There was a trend for better 2-year OS in CR (OS: CR vs. no CR: 78% vs. 63%, p=0.063. Conclusion: We confirm the feasibility of haplo-SCT using NMAC and PT-Cy with low incidence of GVHD (notably severe forms) and NRM. In addition, we observed a relatively low incidence of relapse (19%) in this cohort of heavily pretreated patients, underlining a potent graft-versus-lymphoma effect after haplo-SCT, leading to promising survivals, including high rate of GRFS (>50%), suggesting a preserved long term quality of life in survivors. We conclude that NMAC haplo-SCT with PT-Cy should be considered as a valuable curative option for advanced lymphoma patients, with a favorable toxicity profile and promising long term survival. Figure Disclosures Stoppa: celgene: Other: travel fees, lecture fees; takeda: Other: travel fees. Carlo-Stella:MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Travel, accommodations; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Genenta Science sr: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Travel, accommodations; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Chabannon:EBMT: Other: Working Party Chair, Board member; Fresenius Kabi: Other: research support; Miltenyi Biotech: Other: research support; Terumo BCT: Other: speaker's fees; Celgene: Other: speaker's fees; Novartis: Other: speaker's fees; Gilead: Other: speaker's fees, hospitalities; Sanofi SA: Other: research support, speaker's fees, hospitalities. Santoro:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Abb-Vie: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Arqule: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Lilly: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Blaise:Sanofi: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Molmed: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pierre Fabre medicaments: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Depletion of donor lymphocytes by counterflow centrifugation successfully prevents acute graft-versus-host disease in matched allogeneic marrow transplantation

Blood ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 1302-1308
Author(s):  
T de Witte ◽  
J Hoogenhout ◽  
B de Pauw ◽  
R Holdrinet ◽  
J Janssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Primary Graft Failure ◽  
Acute Graft

Bone marrow from 22 histocompatible siblings was depleted of 98% of the lymphocytes using a combination of density flotation centrifugation followed by counterflow elutriation. Even with the marrow suppressive influence of methotrexate (MTX), the viability of the hematopoietic stem cells was not affected, as indicated by the normal repopulation after grafting in the evaluable patients. One patient (UPN 9) showed a primary graft failure, possibly resulting from persisting septicemia and long-term antibiotic therapy. Two patients have persistent host lymphocytes, one of whom was examined during relapse; the other remains in remission. Two patients did not receive immunosuppression after bone marrow transplantation (BMT), and acute graft-v-host disease (GVHD) developed in both. Nine patients received MTX as immunosuppression following BMT. GVHD did not develop in any of them, but fatal infections in the immediate posttransplant period developed in five patients. Eleven patients received cyclosporine (CsA) after transplantation. Beginning in week 5 after BMT, CsA was gradually replaced by MTX. Acute GVHD, substantial chronic GVHD, or fatal infections did not develop in any of these patients. Removal of 98% of the lymphocytes by counterflow centrifugation prevents development of acute GVHD, provided that immunosuppression is administered after BMT. Graft rejection was not observed, but the number of evaluable patients is limited at present.

scholarly journals Bone marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia: influence of conditioning and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimens on outcome

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Gluckman ◽  
MM Horowitz ◽  
RE Champlin ◽  
JM Hows ◽  
A Bacigalupo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Severe Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis

Data for 595 patients with severe aplastic anemia receiving HLA- identical sibling bone marrow transplants were analyzed to determine the effect of pretransplant conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis on outcome. Transplants were performed between 1980 and 1987 and reported to the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry. Three conditioning regimens (cyclophosphamide alone, cyclophosphamide plus limited field radiation, and cyclophosphamide plus total body radiation) were studied; none was associated with superior long-term survival. Three GVHD prophylaxis regimens (methotrexate, cyclosporine, and methotrexate plus cyclosporine) were studied. Recipients of cyclosporine with or without methotrexate had a significantly higher probability of 5-year survival (69%, 95% confidence interval 63% to 74%) than patients receiving methotrexate only (56%, 49% to 62%, P less than .003). Higher survival with cyclosporine resulted from decreased risks of interstitial pneumonia (P less than .0002) and chronic GVHD (P less than .005). Additional risk factors adversely associated with survival included infection pretransplant (P less than .004), use of parous or transfused female donors (P less than .005), older patient age (P less than .005), and 20 or more pretransplant transfusions (P less than .006). These data may prove useful in planning randomized clinical trials and in identifying patients at high-risk of treatment failure.

Chronic graft versus host disease is associated with long-term risk for pneumococcal infections in recipients of bone marrow transplants

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 95 (12) ◽  
pp. 3683-3686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samar Kulkarni ◽  
Ray Powles ◽  
Jennie Treleaven ◽  
Unell Riley ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Pneumococcal Infection ◽  
Pneumococcal Infections ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Penicillin Prophylaxis

Abstract Incidences of and risk factors for Streptococcus pneumoniaesepsis (SPS) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were analyzed in 1329 patients treated at a single center between 1973 and 1997. SPS developed in 31 patients a median of 10 months after transplantation (range, 3 to 187 months). The infection was fatal in 7 patients. The probability of SPS developing at 5 and 10 years was 4% and 6%, respectively. Age, sex, diagnosis, and graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis did not influence the development of SPS. Allogeneic transplantation (10-year probability, 7% vs 3% for nonallogeneic transplants; P = .03) and chronic GVHD (10-year probability, 14% vs 4%; P = .002) were associated with significantly higher risk for SPS. All the episodes of SPS were seen in patients who had undergone allograft or total body irradiation (TBI) (31 of 1202 vs 0 of 127;P = .07). Eight patients were taking regular penicillin prophylaxis at the time of SPS, whereas 23 were not taking any prophylaxis. None of the 7 patients with fatal infections was taking prophylaxis for Pneumococcus. Pneumococcal bacteremia was associated with higher incidences of mortality (6 of 15 vs 1 of 16;P = .04). We conclude that there is a significant long-term risk for pneumococcal infection in patients who have undergone allograft transplantation, especially those with chronic GVHD. Patients who have undergone autograft transplantation after TBI-containing regimens also appear to be at increased risk. These patients should receive lifelong pneumococcus prophylaxis. Consistent with increasing resistance to penicillin, penicillin prophylaxis does not universally prevent SPS, though it may protect against fatal infections. Further studies are required to determine the optimum prophylactic strategy in patients at risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document