scholarly journals Large-scale combining signals from both biomedical literature and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to improve post-marketing drug safety signal detection

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Xu ◽  
QuanQiu Wang
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3202
Author(s):  
Jae-Woo Ju ◽  
Nayoung Kim ◽  
Seong Mi Yang ◽  
Won Ho Kim ◽  
Ho-Jin Lee

We aimed to investigate the incidence of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis in a large Korean population. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis between 2013 and 2019 from the database of the Korea Institute of Drug Safety-Risk Management-Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KIDS-KAERS). We estimated the incidence of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis from the KIDS-KAERS database, assuming that the reporting efficiency was 10%, 50%, and 100%, respectively. We also investigated its annual sales volume in Korea and assumed that the exposure to sugammadex was 95% of the estimated sales volume. During the study period, 1,401,630 sugammadex vials were sold, and 19 cases of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis were identified in the KIDS-KAERS database. The estimated incidence of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis was 0.0143%, 0.00279%, and 0.0014%, assuming a reporting efficiency of 10%, 50%, and 100%, respectively. All patients, except for one with a missing record, fully recovered after anaphylaxis. The incidence of sugammadex-induced anaphylaxis identified in the national pharmacovigilance database was lower than previously reported rates in other countries. Therefore, its use in general anesthesia should not be hindered by concerns about the resulting risk of anaphylaxis in Korea.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 2265-2279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Spachos ◽  
Spyridon Siafis ◽  
Panagiotis Bamidis ◽  
Dimitrios Kouvelas ◽  
Georgios Papazisis

This study sought to detect a potential safety signal of mirtazapine abuse by combining two different sources of surveillance, specifically Google Analytics (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Data from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2017 were collected and analysed. The search interest over time, the frequencies of abuse-related terms in the search analytics domain, and the odds ratio of abuse events in FDA Adverse Event Reporting System were determined. Correlations between the two aforementioned domains using quarterly data from the timeline series were also assessed. Our results suggest a positive correlation between abuse-related searches in the Google domain and abuse-related events in FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. These results indicate that these methods can be used in combination with each other as a pharmacovigilance supplementary tool to detect drug safety signals.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4063-4063
Author(s):  
Beatrice J. Edwards ◽  
Beatrice Nardone ◽  
Dennis W Raisch ◽  
June M. Mckoy ◽  
Steven M Belknap ◽  
...  

4063 Background: In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported on 23 patients who had developed distal esophageal cancer, with alendronate (ALN) within 2 years of initiation of therapy. Similarly, 31 cases of esophageal cancer were reported from Europe and Japan. Esophagitis has been associated with oral BPs. Erosive esophagitis and persistent mucosal abnormalities have been noted with crystalline material (similar to ground ALN). Our objective was to assess the FDA Adverse event reporting system (FDA AERS) for a safety signal. Methods: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database was searched using terms related to esophageal cancer combined with all drug names for bisphosphonates (search period:1996-2010). Disproportionality ratios were calculated: Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and Empiric Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) determining that the esophageal cancer cases were more common with bisphosphonates than with other drugs in the database. Results: We identified 128 cases of bisphosphonate-associated esophageal cancer; 114 (89%) female and 14 male (11%), mean age 72 ± 12 yrs; the drugs included alendronate (n=96, 75%), risedronate sodium (n=14, 11%), ibandronic acid (n=10, 7.8%), zoledronic acid (n=7, 5.4%) and pamidronate (n=1, 1%). Barrett’s esophagus was listed in 3 cases of esophageal carcinoma. A significant safety signal was found only for alendronate with a PRR= 6.4 (95% C.I. 5.29, 7.730; p=0.001), EBGM = 6.3 (95% C.I. 5.1, 7.6 p=0.001). Conclusions: Our analysis of FDA AERS identifies a larger number of cases of esophageal cancer than previously described, and a significant safety signal with alendronate use. Avoidance of oral bisphosphonates in patients with Barrett’s esophagus, and persistent mucosal abnormalities is recommended. Increased awareness and vigilance is needed for patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document