scholarly journals Modular titanium alloy neck adapter failures in hip replacement - failure mode analysis and influence of implant material

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M Grupp ◽  
Thomas Weik ◽  
Wilhelm Bloemer ◽  
Hanns-Peter Knaebel
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 4449-4456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaharah A. Ghani ◽  
Che Hassan Che Haron ◽  
Siti Hartini Hamdan ◽  
Ahmad Yasir Md Said ◽  
Siti Haryani Tomadi

Author(s):  
Martin Versen ◽  
Dorina Diaconescu ◽  
Jerome Touzel

Abstract The characterization of failure modes of DRAM is often straight forward if array related hard failures with specific addresses for localization are concerned. The paper presents a case study of a bitline oriented failure mode connected to a redundancy evaluation in the DRAM periphery. The failure mode analysis and fault modeling focus both on the root-cause and on the test aspects of the problem.


2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Miranda ◽  
Luiz Henrique Maykot Prates ◽  
Ricardo de Souza Vieira ◽  
Maria Cristina Marino Calvo

The aims of this study were to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of four adhesive systems applied to primary dentin and enamel and verify, after SBS testing, the failure mode of the adhesive interface. Sixty extracted sound primary molars were selected and crowns were sectioned in a mesial-distal direction. Specimens were randomly assigned into two groups (adhesion to enamel and adhesion to dentin) and then subdivided into four subgroups according to the adhesive system (n=15): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP) – Single Bond (SB) – Clearfil SE Bond (and Adper Prompt LPop (APL) – SBS tests were performed and the obtained values were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<0.05). The failure mode analysis was performed with a Scanning Electron Microscope (XL-30, Philips). SBS mean values on enamel were [MPa (SD)]: SMP – 27.89 (7.49); SB – 23.92 (8.8); CSB – 24.36 (6.69); APL – 25.96 (4.08); and on dentin: SMP – 17.29 (4.25); SB – 18.2 (8.74); CSB – 16.13 (7.14); APL – 6.04 (3.35). The predominant failure mode was cohesive (primarily of the bonding agent). On enamel SBS was statistically similar for all four adhesives. On dentin SBS of APL was lower than the other tested adhesives.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 899-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Lin ◽  
Yalong Li ◽  
Kun Hu ◽  
Bo Yuan ◽  
Genmao Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document