scholarly journals Psychometric assessment of the family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (fs-icu-24) questionnaire among family members of patients admitted to adult general icus in the united kingdom

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
DA Harrison ◽  
◽  
P Ferrando-Vivas ◽  
SE Wright ◽  
E McColl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Psychometric Assessment ◽  
General Icus ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Family

Psychometric assessment of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire in the United Kingdom

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 346-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Harrison ◽  
Paloma Ferrando-Vivas ◽  
Stephen E Wright ◽  
Elaine McColl ◽  
Daren K Heyland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Psychometric Assessment ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Family

scholarly journals Developing Family Satisfaction with Care in Adult Critical Care Public Hospital Terengganu, Malaysia

2021 ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Wan Nor Aliza Wan Abdul Rahman ◽  
Abdul Karim Othman ◽  
Yuzana Mohd Yusop ◽  
Asyraf Afthanorhan ◽  
Hasnah Zani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Family

In admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU), there is a high possibility of a life-threatening condition and possible emotional distress for family members. When the family is distressed and hospitalized, a significant level of stress and anxiety will be generated among family members, thereby decreasing their ability to make responsible decisions. As a result, the family members need full and up-to-date details, helping them to retain hope, and this contributes to lower stress levels. While there is growing evidence of the effectiveness of shared decision-making for family members who are directly involved in decisions, particularly regarding shared decision-making in the Malaysian context, there is less evidence that supported decisions help overall outcome. This study aims to developing the family satisfaction with decision making in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU)-33 Malay language version of family member’s satisfaction with care and decision making during their stay at the intensive care units. A quantitative, cross-sectional validation study and purposive sampling was conducted from 1st November 2017 and 10 October 2018 to January 2020 among 208 of family members.  The family members of the ICU patients involved in this study had an excellent satisfaction level with service care. Higher satisfaction in ICU care resulting in higher decision-making satisfaction and vice versa.

scholarly journals Family satisfaction with critical care in the UK: a multicentre cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Ferrando ◽  
Doug W Gould ◽  
Emma Walmsley ◽  
Alvin Richards-Belle ◽  
Ruth Canter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Family Member ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
General Icus ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Uk

ObjectiveTo assess family satisfaction with intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK using the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24-item (FS-ICU-24) questionnaire, and to investigate how characteristics of patients and their family members impact on family satisfaction.DesignProspective cohort study nested within a national clinical audit database.SettingStratified, random sample of 20 adult general ICUs participating in the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme.ParticipantsFamily members of patients staying at least 24 hours in ICU were recruited between May 2013 and June 2014.InterventionsConsenting family members were sent a postal questionnaire 3 weeks after the patient died or was discharged from ICU. Up to four family members were recruited per patient.Main outcome measuresFamily satisfaction was measured using the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire.Main resultsA total of 12 346 family members of 6380 patients were recruited and 7173 (58%) family members of 4615 patients returned a completed questionnaire. Overall and domain-specific family satisfaction scores were high (mean overall family satisfaction 80, satisfaction with care 83, satisfaction with information 76 and satisfaction with decision-making 73 out of 100) but varied significantly across adult general ICUs studied and by whether the patient survived ICU. For family members of ICU survivors, characteristics of both the family member (age, ethnicity, relationship to patient (next-of-kin and/or lived with patient) and visit frequency) and the patient (acute severity of illness and receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation) were significant determinants of family satisfaction, whereas, for family members of ICU non-survivors, only patient characteristics (age, acute severity of illness and duration of stay) were significant.ConclusionsOverall family satisfaction in UK adult general ICUs was high but varied significantly. Adjustment for differences in family member/patient characteristics is important to avoid falsely identifying ICUs as statistical outliers.Trial registration numberISRCTN47363549

scholarly journals Consenting patients for elective procedures during the pandemic: Are we consenting for risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection

2021 ◽  
pp. 175045892110452
Author(s):  
CU Menakaya ◽  
M Durand-Hill ◽  
O Okereke ◽  
DM Eastwood
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Referral Centre ◽  
Tertiary Referral ◽  
Tertiary Referral Centre ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The United Kingdom

Introduction: Nosocomial COVID-19 increases morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgical procedures. This study assesses the consenting process in patients admitted for surgical procedures with regard to risks of contracting nosocomial COVID-19 infection during the three lockdown periods in the United Kingdom. Methods: Retrospective review of consecutive surgical patients admitted to our tertiary referral centre for surgical procedures during the lockdown periods in the United Kingdom. Data from our hospital’s electronic theatre database cross-referenced with the online surgical operative, admission and discharge records were reviewed by three independent reviewers. Discussion: A total of 180 patients (104 males and 76 females) were studied. No patients tested positive perioperatively for COVID-19. The first lockdown had a significantly larger proportion of consultants consenting (P < 0.001). Surgeons consented patients for risk of COVID-19 infection in 34.4% of cases, COVID-19-related illness in 33.9%, inpatient Intensive Care Unit (ITU) admission secondary to COVID-19 infection and risk of death due to COVID-19 in 0.0% and risk of death secondary to inpatient COVID infection in 1.1%. Conclusion: As surgical activity continues and COVID-19 persists, surgeons should be vigilant and ensure proper documentation for consent regarding COVID-19-related complications in line with the Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines.

Making a Connection: Family Experiences With Bedside Rounds in the Intensive Care Unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn E. Cody ◽  
Susan Sullivan-Bolyai ◽  
Patricia Reid-Ponte
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Management Style ◽  
Family Management ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Bedside Rounds ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Future

Background The hospitalization of a family member in an intensive care unit can be stressful for the family. Family bedside rounds is a way for the care team to inform family members, answer questions, and involve them in care decisions. The experiences of family members with intensive care unit bedside rounds have been examined in few studies. Objectives To describe (1) the experiences of family members of patients in the intensive care unit who participated in family bedside rounds (ie, view of the illness, role in future management, and long-term consequences on individual and family functioning) and (2) the experiences of families who chose not to participate in family bedside rounds and their perspectives regarding its value, their illness view, and future involvement in care. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was done, undergirded by the Family Management Style Framework, examining families that participated and those that did not. Results Most families that participated (80%) found the process helpful. One overarching theme, Making a Connection: Comfort and Confidence, emerged from participating families. Two major factors influenced how that connection was made: consistency and preparing families for the future. Three types of consistency were identified: consistency in information being shared, in when rounds were being held, and in informing families of rounding delays. In terms of preparing families for the future, families appeared to feel comfortable with the situation when a connection was present. When any of the factors were missing, families described feelings of anger, frustration, and fear. Family members who did not participate described similar feelings and fear of the unknown because of not having participated. Conclusion What health care providers say to patients’ families matters. Families may need to be included in decision-making with honest, consistent, easy-to-understand information.

The Vortex: Families’ Experiences With Death in the Intensive Care Unit

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin T. Kirchhoff ◽  
Lee Walker ◽  
Ann Hutton ◽  
Vicki Spuhler ◽  
Beth Vaughan Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Life Experiences ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Terminal Condition ◽  
Loved One ◽  
The Family ◽  
Downward Spiral ◽  
Eventual Loss

• Background Lack of communication from healthcare providers contributes to the anxiety and distress reported by patients’ families after a patient’s death in the intensive care unit.• Objective To obtain a detailed picture of the experiences of family members during the hospitalization and death of a loved one in the intensive care unit.• Methods A qualitative study with 4 focus groups was used. All eligible family members from 8 intensive care units were contacted by telephone; 8 members agreed to participate.• Results The experiences of the family members resembled a vortex: a downward spiral of prognoses, difficult decisions, feelings of inadequacy, and eventual loss despite the members’ best efforts, and perhaps no good-byes. Communication, or its lack, was a consistent theme. The participants relied on nurses to keep informed about the patients’ condition and reactions. Although some participants were satisfied with this information, they wished for more detailed explanations of procedures and consequences. Those family members who thought that the best possible outcome had been achieved had had a physician available to them, options for treatment presented and discussed, and family decisions honored.• Conclusions Uncertainty about the prognosis of the patient, decisions that families make before a terminal condition, what to expect during dying, and the extent of a patient’s suffering pervade families’ end-of-life experiences in the intensive care unit. Families’ information about the patient is often lacking or inadequate. The best antidote for families’ uncertainty is effective communication.

Timely Family Feedback to Guide Family Engagement in the Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 42-51
Author(s):  
Natalie S. McAndrew ◽  
Laura Mark ◽  
Mary Butler
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Family Engagement ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Family Experience ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
The Family

Background Organizations motivated to provide high-quality care in the intensive care unit are exploring strategies to engage families in patient care. Such initiatives are based on emerging evidence that family engagement improves quality and safety of care. Objective To gather family feedback to guide future nurse-led quality improvement efforts to engage families in the intensive care unit setting. Methods The Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey, which consists of 20 items rated from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), was paired with open-ended questions and administered to families during the intensive care unit stay from March through December 2017. Content analysis was used to identify themes regarding the family experience. Results Responses were collected from 178 family members. The mean (SD) score on the survey was 4.65 (0.33). Five themes emerged regarding the delivery of family care in the intensive care unit: family interactions with the interdisciplinary team, information sharing and effective communication, family navigation of the intensive care unit environment, family engagement in the intensive care unit, and quality of patient care. Conclusions This quality improvement project provided foundational information to guide family engagement efforts in the intensive care unit. Real-time solicitation of feedback is essential to improving the family experience and guiding family-centered care delivery in this practice environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document