scholarly journals Central venous catheter-related infection: a cohort study evaluating dedicated central venous catheter packs

Critical Care ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. P22
Author(s):  
S Mukerji ◽  
R Daniels ◽  
K Maung ◽  
A Mattin
1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 494-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Astagneau ◽  
Sylvie Maugat ◽  
Tuan Tran-Minh ◽  
Marie-Cécile Douard ◽  
Pascale Longuet ◽  
...  

Objectives:To evaluate and compare the risk of long-term central venous catheter (CVC) infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and cancer patients.Design:Prospective multicenter cohort study based on active surveillance of long-term CVC manipulations and patient outcome over a 6-month period.Setting:Services of infectious diseases and oncology of 12 university hospitals in Paris, France.Participants:In 1995, all HIV and cancer patients with solid malignancy were included at the time of long-term CVC implantation.Results:Overall, 31.6% of long-term CVC infections were identified in 32% of 201 HIV and 5% of 255 cancer patients. Most were associated with bacteremia, most commonly coagulase-negative staphylococci. The long-term CVC time-related infection risk was greater in HIV than in cancer patients (3.78 vs 0.39 infections per 1,000 long-term CVC days; P<.001). The independent risk factors of long-term CVC infection were as follows: in HIV patients, frequency of long-term CVC handling and neutropenia; in cancer patients, poor Karnofsky performance status; in both HIV and cancer patients, recent history of bacterial infection. The risk of long-term CVC infection was similar for tunneled catheters and venous access ports in each population.Conclusions:Prevention of long-term CVC infection should focus first on better sterile precautions while handling long-term CVC, especially in HIV patients who have frequent and daily use of the long-term CVC.


Critical Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. P80
Author(s):  
J Mitchell ◽  
P Shetty ◽  
F Cox ◽  
P Vuddamalay

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peadar S. Waters ◽  
Andrew W. Smith ◽  
Emer Fitzgerald ◽  
Faraz Khan ◽  
Brendan J. Moran ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Yamashita ◽  
Ayako Takamori ◽  
Akira Nakagawachi ◽  
Yoshinori Tanigawa ◽  
Yohei Hamada ◽  
...  

Abstract To determine the prophylactic effect of using combined 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine gel-impregnated dressings (CGCD) on catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in critically ill patients. This retrospective cohort study was performed in an intensive care unit from November 2009 to August 2014. The CRT incidence diagnosed with ultrasound examination was compared between patients applying CGCD and combined 10% aqueous povidone-iodine and standard transparent dressings (PITD) after central venous catheter insertion into the internal jugular vein for ≥ 48 h. CRT was stratified into early (within 7 days) and late (days 8–14) thromboses. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression models clarified the relationships between early- and late-CRT risks and skin antiseptic and catheter site dressing combinations. CRT occurred in 74 of 134 patients (55%), including 52 with early CRT and 22 with late CRT. Patients receiving CGCD had a significantly lower incidence of early CRT than those receiving PITD (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% confidence interval = 0.07–0.45, p  < .001). No significant association was evident between using CGCD and late CRT (p  = .514). Compared to PITD, CGCD reduced the CRT risk over 7 days in critically ill patients. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000037492.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document