scholarly journals Multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of staghorn stones

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aso Omer Rashid ◽  
Sarwar Noori Mahmood ◽  
Aram Karim Amin ◽  
Rawa Bapir ◽  
Noor Buchholz
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Unit ◽  
First Line ◽  
Combination Treatments ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Calculus ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Patient Stone ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Stones

Abstract Background Staghorn stones are difficult to manage with a risk of significant renal impairment and urosepsis. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the first-line treatment for staghorn stones. Often, multiple access tracts are needed to render the patient stone-free. PCNL has been combined with SWL, flexible URS (ECIRS), and mini-PCNL to access residual fragments without the need of additional tracts. However, in a country with limited access to technology and a restraint on resources, multitract PCNL still is the preferred option. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of multitract PCNL in such an environment. Methods We analyzed data on sixty-five patients with staghorn calculus who underwent multitract PCNL for a staghorn calculus. Data included demographics, stone parameters, intraoperative parameters, complications and clinical outcomes. Hb-drop and creatinine changes were assessed pre- and post-OP. Complications were graded according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Results In a total of 65 patients [47 males (72%)], 154 percutaneous access tracts were used in 66 renal units. The number of tracts varied between 2 and 4 in a single renal unit. The stone-free rate was 85%. 20% of patients developed grade I, 14% grade II, and 3% grade III b complications. There were no grade IV and V complications. Conclusion Multitract PCNL is safe and efficient, with a good stone-free rate and an acceptable complication rate. When auxiliary combination treatments are not available, multitract standard PCNL remains an option.

scholarly journals Prediction of the stone free rate by using the guy's stone score after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-200
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shafikul Islam ◽  
Muhammad Hossain ◽  
Md. Saiful Islam ◽  
AKM Khurshidul Alam ◽  
Md. Habibur Rahman Dulal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Normal Body Mass Index ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Residual Stone ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: Urolithiasis is one of the common diseases of the urinary system, with an incidence of approximately 5-10% among the general population. Among the minimally invasive surgeries, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard therapy for large and/or complex renal stones. Objective: The study was carried out to predict the stone-free rate after PCNL by using the Guy's stone score. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, (BSMMU), Dhaka from February 2016 to January 2017. The patients with renal stone attending the outpatient department who met the criteria of standard PCNL. Results: Atotal of 52 patients with renal stone were included in this study.  The mean age was to be found 45.3±14.0 with range of 18 to 73 years. Male to female ratio was 3.3:1. Almost three fourth (74.5%) patients had normal body mass index. All patients had normal anatomy. More than half 27 of the (51.9%) patients had found grade I, 10 (19.2%) Grade II, 11(21.2%) Grade III and 4 (7.7%) Grade IV. Nearly two third 34 (65.4%) patients were found total stone cleared and 18(34.6%) had residual stone. Cleared stone was found 23(85.2%) in grade I, 7(70.0%) grade II, 3(27.3%) in grade III and 1(25.0%) in grade IV. Conclusion: Based on the study findings, it may be concluded that higher the GSS less the stone free rate.It will help in better patient counseling preoperatively, and to predict the need for ancillary treatment.

scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for treatment of staghorn stones in pediatric patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed R. EL-Nahas ◽  
Ahmed A Shokeir ◽  
Ahmed M Shoma ◽  
Ibrahim Eraky ◽  
Osama M Sarhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Stones

Introduction: We compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery in the treatment of staghorn stones in children.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic records of children who underwent treatment for staghorn stones between September 2000 and August 2013. They were divided between Group 1 (patients who underwent PCNL) and Group 2 (patients who underwent open surgery). We compared stone-free and complications rates, need for multiple procedures, and hospital stay.Results: The study included 41 patients (35 boys and 6 girls), with mean age 7.4 ± 3.1 years (range: 2–15). Of these 41 patients, 26 had unilateral renal stone and 15 had bilateral renal stones. The total number of treated renal units was 56: 28 underwent PCNL and 28 underwent open surgery. The complication rate was comparable for both groups (32% for open surgery vs. 28.6%, p = 0.771). Multiple procedures were more needed in PCNL group (60.7% vs. 32% in open surgery, p = 0.032). The stone-free rate was 71.4% after PCNL and 78.6% after open surgery (p = 0.537). A significant difference was observed in shorter hospital stay after PCNL (5 vs. 8.8 days, p < 0.001). Our study’s limitations include its retrospective design and relatively small sample size.Conclusions: For the treatment of staghorn stones in children, PCNL was comparable to open surgery in complication and stone-free rates. PCNL had the advantage of a shorter hospital stay and open surgery showed a decreased need for multiple procedures. 

scholarly journals Differences Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Open Surgery in Staghorn Stone Patients: Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 381-385
Author(s):  
Ramandita Duta Dewangga ◽  
Tarmono Djojodimedjo ◽  
Dyah Erawati
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Additional Therapy ◽  
Staghorn Stone ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Stones

This study purpose to analyze the differences in the effectiveness of PCNL and open surgery in patients with staghorn stones. We searched the literatures from PubMed and ScienceDirect from year 2005 until 2020. The method used in this study was a systematic review with a quantitative statistical approach (meta-analysis) using primary research data. From 4 studies there were 148 cases of PCNL and 98 cases of open surgery. PCNL had lower postoperative stone-free rate than open surgery (OR 0.168). PCNL had a lower final stone-free rate than open surgery (OR 0.603). The number of patients who had complications with PCNL was lower than open surgery (OR 0.451). The number of patients receiving blood transfusions on PCNL was lower than for open surgery (OR 0.494). Patients who received PCNL procedure required a shorter hospital stay than open surgery (MD -3,234). The number of patients who received additional therapy modalities on PCNL was lower than open surgery (OR 1.917). The conclusions obtained in this study indicate that there are differences in the effectiveness of PCNL and open surgery for patients with staghorn stones. Keywords: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; open surgery; staghorn stone

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Simultaneous Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 114-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Bahadur Adhikari ◽  
Sumeet Karna ◽  
Atul Kasaju
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy in one tertiary hospital in Nepal.Methods: Retrospective study was done for all patients that underwent bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our center from January 2010 to December 2017. The study included 36 male and 16 female patients with totalof 104renal units at an average age of 37 years (range 3 -65 years). Five patients were planned for bilateral simultaneous Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, but intraoperatively the procedure was aborted after completion of only one side due to various factors. All PCNL were performed in prone position under general anesthesia.Results: In91.2% of the patients, bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy could be performed as planned. Average time required for bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 94 ± 38.8mins (range 25 – 170 mins) with average hemoglobin drop of 1.85 ± 1.30gm% (range 0.1 - 4.2gm%) and no significant change in serum creatinine levels. Multiple access tracts (>1) had to be created in 3 renal units. Most of the renal stones were Guy’s stone score (GSS) 1 and 2 whereas 15.4% were GSS of 3 and 4.Overall stone free rate was 94% with significant residual stones (>4mm) in 6 renal units which were subjected to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) on a later date (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-a). Bladder clot evacuation was done in one patient (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-b). Blood transfusion was required in two patients and two patients developed postoperative sepsis (Clavien-Dindo Grade: II). One patient developed hydrothorax which was managed successfully (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-a). Conclusions: Bilateral simultaneous Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is feasible and safe procedure, given that the patients are appropriately selected based upon Guy’s stone score, stone burden, pelvi-calyceal anatomy and overall health status.Keywords: Bilateral simultaneous;endourology; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; urolithiasis.

scholarly journals BODY MASS INDEX RELATIONS WITH THE DIFFICULTIES AND COMPLICATIONS OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fauriski Febrian Prapiska ◽  
Sunaryo Hardjowijoto ◽  
Doddy M Soebadi ◽  
Tarmono Djojodimedjo
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Kidney Stone ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Right ◽  
Free Rate

Objective: To identified outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients of various body mass indices (BMI) to determine the safety of this procedure in patients with elevated BMI.Material & methods: The analytic observational prospective study of patients who underwent PCNL between February to July 2015 in the operating room Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya. Specifically, BMI, stone-free rates, difficulties duringsurgery, complications, and Clavien score were assessed. We evaluate the independent contribution of BMI as a predictor of outcomes. Results: There were 35 selected patients with kidney stone and planned to PCNL, 20 patients were included and 15 patients were excluded from this study. The patients consisted of 10 men (50%) and 10 women (50%). Mean age was 47.55 years (range 33-75). There were 4 patients with diabetes (20%), and 10 patients with hypertension (50%). Mean stone size was 23.30 mm. Stone location was 11 patients (55%) in the right kidney, and 9 patients (45%) in the left. There were 12 patients (60%) with a single stone, and 8 patients (40%) with multiple stones. BMI values were distributed as follows,underweight 1 patient (5%), normoweight 7 patients (35%), overweight 6 patients (30%), obesity 6 patients (30%). Mean skin to stone distance (SSD) was 87.56 mm. Stone free rate was 55%, and difficulties during surgery only seen in 1 patient (5%) bleeding profusely and open surgery was performed. Clavien score in these patients were grade I in 11 patients (55%), grade II in 7 patients (35%), and grade IIIB in 2 patients (10%). The BMI had no significant effect with Intra operative and postoperative difficulties (0.390. p <0.05. CI 95%). However the lower stone free rate had significant effect (0.040. p <0.05. CI 95%).Conclusion: BMI had no significant effect with Intraoperative and postoperative difficulties in PCNL.However, the lower stone-free rate risk associated with elevated BMI was significant.

scholarly journals Ultrasound for kidney access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a contemporary review

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Alexandru Iordache ◽  
Catalin Baston ◽  
Guler-Margaritis Silviu-Stelian ◽  
Emil Angelescu ◽  
Vasile Cerempei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Calculus ◽  
Comparable Method ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Kidney Access

Nowadays percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard of care for renal staghorn calculus or large (>20 mm) pelvic or caliceal stones, as well as for the failure of other treatment options. This review aims to evaluate the contemporary use of ultrasound imaging in PCNL, by comparing it to conventional fluoroscopy, reviewing data regarding the complication and success rate of nephrostomy tract creation and stone free rate (SFR), as well as data concerning the learning curve for these procedures and cost indicators. The evidence acquired shows that the ultrasound guided access (USGA) is a comparable method with the classic fluoroscopic guided access (FGA), with a similar safety profile, with a significant reduction in radiation exposure, up to radiation free complete PCNL. USGA PCNL seems to lead to decreased bleeding and need for transfusion, especially when the Doppler mode is used, and also to a slightly higher SFR than conventional FGA PCNL. USGA PCNL reduces the overall costs of the procedure by about 30% and can be safely learnt and performed by urologists. For an experienced endourologist, familiar withFGA PCNL, the learning curve for shifting to USGA PCNL is of approximately 20 procedures. 

scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrolithotomy-a versatile technique for both simple and complex renal stone

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
TMS Hossain ◽  
M Asaduzzaman ◽  
MN Uddin ◽  
MH Rahman ◽  
MU Jahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
First Line ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Versatile Technique ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Puncture Technique

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is currently the preferred first line treatment for simple & complex renal calculi. The technique also being used increasingly for smaller stones that have failed ESWL. Aim of the study is to share our experience in PCNL in course of time. This study was conducted from January 2009 to December 2012, 131 patient’s with 142 renal units of 5-75 yrs of age, PCNL were performed in NIKDU, BSMMU & JBFH. Stone were classified into simple (isolated renal pelvis or isolated calyceal stones) or complex (partial or complete staghorn stones, renal pelvic stone with accompanying calyceal stones). The stone size was 1.5-5cm approximately. We asses our initial puncture technique, need for multi-tract, supra 12th rib access, stone free rate, operative duration, postoperative complication, number of transfusion and hospital stay. Operative durations were 60 min -180 minutes. Puncture technique improved in course of time. 14 patients need multi-puncture and tract, all are supra 12th access. Out of 142 renal units 120 (83%) were stone free after first procedure, another 22 need and auxiliary procedure, (5 2nd look PCNL, 6 URS, 11 ESWL) to become stone free result in a 95% stone free rate. Complications occurred in 17 procedures which dealt accordingly. This study revealed PCNL is an effective, versatile safe and cosmetically acceptable procedure for all age groups in simple and complex renal stone. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v39i3.20308 Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2013; 39: 99-103

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 030006052098313
Author(s):  
Tie Mao ◽  
Na Wei ◽  
Jing Yu ◽  
Yinghui Lu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Complementary Treatment ◽  
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Background We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for treating renal stones larger than 2 cm. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for studies that compared the surgical outcomes of LPL and PCNL. We conducted a meta-analysis of the retrieved studies, expressed as weighted mean difference or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results We included 25 studies (1831 patients). LPL was associated with a significantly higher stone-free rate, lower rates of blood loss, complementary treatment, blood transfusion, and complications, and less reduction in hemoglobin level compared with PCNL. LPL and PCNL were similar in terms of duration of hospital stay, conversion rate, changes in glomerular filtration rate and creatinine level, and mean time of postoperative analgesia. However, LPL was associated with a longer operation time than PCNL. Conclusion LPL appears to be more effective and safer than PCNL in patients with large renal stones, by increasing the stone-free rate and reducing blood loss, complementary treatment, blood transfusion, and complications compared with PCNL. LPL may thus be a useful modality for treating patients with large renal stones.

scholarly journals Impact of weight on stone-free rate during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdrabuh M. Abdrabuh
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
World Health ◽  
Fluoroscopy Time ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Morbid Obese ◽  
Free Rate

Abstract Background To assess Impact of weight on stone-free rate during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods Hundred and twenty-three PNL procedures were done between January 2016 and July 2017. The patients were divided into four groups according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of body mass index (BMI): < 25 ((group 1, average)), 25–29.9 (group 2, overweight), 30–39.9 (group 3, obese), and ≥ 40 kg/m2 (group 4, morbidly obese). All groups were compared as regarding preoperative variables, intra-operative procedure and postoperative results. Results The non-obese groups were younger in age than obese and morbid obese groups (P = 0.005). The difference in BMI was statistically significant between non-obese and obese groups (P = 0.0001). Most of females gender were obese and morbid obese (P = 0.0001) and most of the obese patients had left-sided renal stone (P = 0.001). Most of overweight and obese groups had radiopaque stones (P = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences between all groups as regarding co-morbidity, stone size, stone locations, and hydronephrosis grade. Operative time (P = 0.034), length of hospital stay (P value = 0.014) and fluoroscopy time (P = 0.0001) were statistically significant differences between all groups. Number of accesses, access site, postoperative hemoglobin drop, post- operative complications, fate of residual stones and stone-free rate were not statistically significant differences between all groups. BMI was correlated with mean fluoroscopy time and mean hospitalization duration in our study as the time of hospitalization and time of x-ray exposure increase with obesity. Conclusion PNL is a safe and effective procedure for obese patients. BMI do not predict clearance post PNL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document