scholarly journals ICSI diagnostic: a way to prevent total fertilization failure after 4 unsuccessful IUI

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Larbuisson ◽  
Dominique Raick ◽  
Stephanie Demelenne ◽  
Annick Delvigne
Author(s):  
Mingzhao Li ◽  
Miaomiao Jia ◽  
Xiaoli Zhao ◽  
Rong Shi ◽  
Xia Xue

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1155-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inci Kahyaoglu ◽  
Berfu Demir ◽  
Ayten Turkkanı ◽  
Ozgur Cınar ◽  
Serdar Dilbaz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pallop Pongsuthirak

Background: The short and long co-incubation time of gametes for in vitro fertilization are still debatable issues. This study aims to investigate the effects of short and long co-incubation time of gametes on fertilization, polyspermy, embryonic developmental potential, and clinical outcomes.Methods: Sixty-five patients undergoing IVF treatment were invited to participate in the study between May 2017 and March 2019. Ovarian hyperstimulation was prescribed and oocytes were obtained by trans-vaginal aspiration under ultrasound guidance. Sibling oocytes were randomly allocated to short co-incubation for 4 hours (Group I) in 352 oocytes and long co-incubation for 16-18 hours in 363 oocytes (Group II). Rescue ICSI was carried out if total fertilization failure was documented. Fertilization, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes were determined.Results: No significant differences between short and long co-incubation were found in fertilization, polyspermy, cleavage, blastocyst, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates.Conclusions: The present study showed that short co-incubation of gametes had no significant difference in fertilization, polyspermy, embryo development, and pregnancy outcomes when compared to long co-incubation. The short co-incubation with early cumulus cell removal and rescue ICSI may have the potential to help a couple who had total fertilization failure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lun Suo ◽  
Yu xiao Zhou ◽  
Li ling Jia ◽  
Hai bo Wu ◽  
Jin Zheng ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2630-2636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Jiaen ◽  
Nagy Zsolt ◽  
Joris Hubert ◽  
Tournaye Herman ◽  
Smitz Johan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2616
Author(s):  
Tanya L. Glenn ◽  
Alex M. Kotlyar ◽  
David B. Seifer

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was originally designed to overcome barriers due to male factor infertility. However, a surveillance study found that ICSI use in non-male factor infertility increased from 15.4% to 66.9% between 1996 and 2012. Numerous studies have investigated fertilization rate, total fertilization failure, and live birth rate per cycle (LBR), comparing the use of ICSI versus conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) for non-male factor infertility. The overwhelming conclusion shows no increase in fertilization rate or LBR per cycle with the use of ICSI for non-male factor infertility. The overuse of ICSI is likely related to the desire to avoid a higher rate of total fertilization failure in IVF. However, data supporting the benefit of using ICSI for non-male factor infertility is lacking, and 33 couples would need to be treated with ICSI unnecessarily to avoid one case of total fertilization failure. Such practice increases the cost to the patient, increases the burden on embryologist’s time, and is a misapplication of resources. Additionally, there remains conflicting data regarding the safety of offspring conceived by ICSI and potential damage to the oocyte. Thus, the use of ICSI should be limited to those with male factor infertility or a history of total fertilization factor infertility due to uncertainties of potential adverse impact and lack of proven benefit in non-male factor infertility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document