scholarly journals Comparison of short and long co-incubation time of gametes for in vitro fertilization

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4366
Author(s):  
Pallop Pongsuthirak
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Incubation Time ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Fertilization Failure ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Fertilization Failure ◽  
Rescue Icsi

Background: The short and long co-incubation time of gametes for in vitro fertilization are still debatable issues. This study aims to investigate the effects of short and long co-incubation time of gametes on fertilization, polyspermy, embryonic developmental potential, and clinical outcomes.Methods: Sixty-five patients undergoing IVF treatment were invited to participate in the study between May 2017 and March 2019. Ovarian hyperstimulation was prescribed and oocytes were obtained by trans-vaginal aspiration under ultrasound guidance. Sibling oocytes were randomly allocated to short co-incubation for 4 hours (Group I) in 352 oocytes and long co-incubation for 16-18 hours in 363 oocytes (Group II). Rescue ICSI was carried out if total fertilization failure was documented. Fertilization, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes were determined.Results: No significant differences between short and long co-incubation were found in fertilization, polyspermy, cleavage, blastocyst, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates.Conclusions: The present study showed that short co-incubation of gametes had no significant difference in fertilization, polyspermy, embryo development, and pregnancy outcomes when compared to long co-incubation. The short co-incubation with early cumulus cell removal and rescue ICSI may have the potential to help a couple who had total fertilization failure.

scholarly journals Comparison of embryonic competence and clinical outcomes between early and late cumulus cell removal for in vitro fertilization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallop Pongsuthirak
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Embryonic Development ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Cumulus Cell ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Rescue Icsi

Objective: The impact of early mechanical removal of cumulus cells on fertilization and embryonic development is not yet precisely known. This study aimed to investigate the effects of early and late cumulus cell removal on fertilization, polyspermy, embryonic development potential, blastocyst development, and clinical outcomes.Methods: A prospective study was conducted of patients who underwent in vitro fertilization between September 2019 and October 2020. Sibling oocytes were randomly allocated after insemination to early cumulus cell removal at 6 hours (group I) and late cumulus cell removal at 16–18 hours (group II). If total fertilization failure (TFF) was determined to have occurred at early cumulus cell removal, rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed. Fertilization, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes were compared.Results: A total of 912 oocytes were assigned to group I (458 oocytes) and group II (454 oocytes). Fertilization, polyspermy, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between both groups. Rescue ICSI enabled fertilization of 79.2% of the TFF oocytes.Conclusion: Early cumulus cell removal at 6 hours had no significant difference in fertilization, polyspermy, embryo development, or obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared to late removal. Early cumulus cell removal combined with early rescue ICSI may have the potential to help couples with TFF.

scholarly journals Should rescue ICSI be re-evaluated considering the deferred transfer of cryopreserved embryos in in-vitro fertilization cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Paffoni ◽  
Marco Reschini ◽  
Valerio Pisaturo ◽  
Cristina Guarneri ◽  
Simone Palini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Fertilization Failure ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Rescue Icsi

Abstract Background Total fertilization failure represents a particularly frustrating condition for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization. With the aim of reducing the occurrence of total fertilization failure, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become the first choice over conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures although evidence of improved results is still debated and its use in couples without male factor infertility is not recommended. Among the strategies potentially useful to promote the use of conventional IVF, we herein call attention to the late rescue ICSI, which consists in performing ICSI after 18–24 h from conventional insemination on oocytes that show no signs of fertilization. This treatment has however been reported to be associated with a low success rate until recent observations that embryos derived from late rescue ICSI may be transferred after cryopreservation in a frozen-thawed cycle with improved results. The aim of the present study was to assess whether frozen embryos deriving from rescue ICSI performed about 24 h after conventional IVF may represent a valuable option for couples experiencing fertilization failure. Methods A systematic review on the efficacy of late rescue ICSI was performed consulting PUBMED and EMBASE. Results Including twenty-two original studies, we showed that clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate obtainable with fresh embryo transfers after rescue ICSI are not satisfactory being equal to 10 and 5%, respectively. The transfer of cryopreserved rescue ICSI embryos seems to offer a substantial improvement of success rates, with pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate equal to 36 and 18%, respectively. Coupling rescue ICSI with frozen embryo transfer may ameliorate the clinical pregnancy rate for embryo transfer with an Odds Ratio = 4.7 (95% CI:2.6–8.6). Conclusion Results of the present review support the idea that r-ICSI coupled with frozen embryo transfer may overcome most of the technical and biological issues associated with fresh transfer after late r-ICSI, thus possibly representing an efficient procedure for couples experiencing fertilization failure following conventional IVF cycles. Trial registration Prospero registration ID: CRD42021239026.

scholarly journals HYSTEROSCOPY BEFORE IN VITRO FERTILIZATION

2018 ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Dejan Mitić ◽  
Radomir Živadinović ◽  
Marin Bašić ◽  
Aleksandra Petrić ◽  
Milan Trenkić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Similar Rate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pathological State ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

In the last decade, success after in vitro fertilization process (IVF) has remained at a similar rate despite all the improvements implemented in the stimulation protocols and laboratory techniques. Hysteroscopy is a method becoming more widely used with patients after a failed IVF cycle, considering a large incidence of uterus cavum pathological states which have a negative impact on the favorable outcome. Numerous studies have provided different results on the IVF outcome with hysteroscopy performed prior to this treatment in cases with no uterus cavum pathology. The aim of the research was to examine the effect of both diagnostic and surgical hysteroscopy on the outcome of IVF.  Hysteroscopy was performed with 74 patients 30 to 50 days prior to IVF and in 33 of them (group I) some pathological state was noticed, which was treated during the same procedure. The control group (group III) included 151 patients who had IVF performed with no prior hysteroscopy. There is no statistically significant difference in the rate of post hysteroscopy implantation between I and II group when compared to the control group (20.62% vs 23.28% vs 17.31%), nor in the rate of clinical pregnancies (45.45% vs 46.34% vs 34.44%). Following the correctional treatment of uterus cavum pathological states, implantation and pregnancy rates remain at a level comparable to hysteroscopically normal medical findings. Statistically significant higher pregnancy rate is present in group I after the first IVF cycle, compared to the next IVF in the same group and in comparison to the next IVF cycle in the control group (60.00% vs 27.91%, p<0.05). Hysteroscopy is a simple and safe method allowing nearly identical rate of clinical pregnancies after a surgical treatment of uterus cavum pathological states when compared to the control group, but statistically much higher pregnancy rate if the order of IVF procedure is being compared. In cases of normal ultrasound findings and negative hysteroscopical findings, performing hysteroscopy prior to IVF does not provide significantly better results. Therefore, its routine execution is not recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document