scholarly journals Development of a simulation-based curriculum for Pediatric prehospital skills: a mixed-methods needs assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin A. Padrez ◽  
John Brown ◽  
Andy Zanoff ◽  
Carol C. Chen ◽  
Nicolaus Glomb

Abstract Background The assessment and treatment of pediatric patients in the out-of-hospital environment often presents unique difficulties and stress for EMS practitioners. Objective Use a mixed-methods approach to assess the current experience of EMS practitioners caring for critically ill and injured children, and the potential role of a simulation-based curriculum to improve pediatric prehospital skills. Methods Data were obtained from three sources in a single, urban EMS system: a retrospective review of local pediatric EMS encounters over one year; survey data of EMS practitioners’ comfort with pediatric skills using a 7-point Likert scale; and qualitative data from focus groups with EMS practitioners assessing their experiences with pediatric patients and their preferred training modalities. Results 2.1% of pediatric prehospital encounters were considered “critical,” the highest acuity level. A total of 136 of approximately 858 prehospital providers responded to the quantitative survey; 34.4% of all respondents either somewhat disagree (16.4%), disagree (10.2%), or strongly disagree (7.8%) with the statement: “I feel comfortable taking care of a critically ill pediatric patient.” Forty-seven providers participated in focus groups that resulted in twelve major themes under three domains. Specific themes included challenges in medication dosing, communication, and airway management. Participants expressed a desire for more repetition and reinforcement of these skills, and they were receptive to the use of high-fidelity simulation as a training modality. Conclusions Critically ill pediatric prehospital encounters are rare. Over one third of EMS practitioners expressed a low comfort level in managing critically ill children. High-fidelity simulation may be an effective means to improve the comfort and skills of prehospital providers.

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Brown ◽  
Emre Ilhan ◽  
Verity Pacey ◽  
Wendy Hau ◽  
Veronica Van Der Kooi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola Janse van Vuuren ◽  
Eunice Seekoe ◽  
Daniel Ter Goon

Although nurse educators are aware of the advantages of simulation-based training, some still feel uncomfortable to use technology or lack the motivation to learn how to use the technology. The aging population of nurse educators causes frustration and anxiety. They struggle with how to include these tools particularly in the light of faculty shortages. Nursing education programmes are increasingly adopting simulation in both undergraduate and graduate curricula. The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of nurse educators regarding the use of high fidelity simulation (HFS) in nursing education at a South African private nursing college. A national survey of nurse educators and clinical training specialists was completed with 118 participants; however, only 79 completed the survey. The findings indicate that everyone is at the same level as far as technology readiness is concerned, however, it does not play a significant role in the use of HFS. These findings support the educators’ need for training to adequately prepare them to use simulation equipment. There is a need for further research to determine what other factors play a role in the use of HFS; and if the benefits of HFS are superior to other teaching strategies warranting the time and financial commitment. The findings of this study can be used as guidelines for other institutions to prepare their teaching staff in the use of HFS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 100983
Author(s):  
Justin Hunter ◽  
Michael Porter ◽  
Andy Phillips ◽  
Melissa Evans-Brave ◽  
Brett Williams

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Supan ◽  
Lauren Patton ◽  
Julie M Fussner ◽  
Colin Beilman ◽  
Martha Sajatovic

Introduction: University Hospitals Health System (UHHS) has seen an interest by nursing in using simulation and case studies as an adjunct to classroom education to instruct in emergency situations and mock codes. UHHS is currently expanding neuroscience services at 2 community hospitals while maintaining services at the quaternary care hospital. There is a need for further neuroscience education of both experienced nurses who have limited neuroscience exposure and novice nurses employed in neuroscience specialty areas. Patient simulators have been used in a variety of education settings, yet their effectiveness in training nurses to manage neurologic patients and neurologic emergencies has not been widely examined. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the use of high-fidelity simulation on nurses’ assessment skills, critical thinking and comfort in caring for neuroscience patients. Methods: A pre and post survey design was used for this project with nurses completing a survey immediately prior to and after participating in 3 simulation scenarios: intracerebral hemorrhage with intracranial pressure, subdural hematoma with seizures, and brain tumor complicated by pulmonary embolism. After completion of each scenario a debriefing occurred. Surveys allowed nurses to assess their confidence levels in responding to neurologic emergencies using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1= strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Results: Comfort level was assessed in five different categories. Comfort in performing a neurologic assessment improved from a pre-survey average of 4.02 to a post-survey average of 4.59, a variance of 11.4%. Comfort in managing a stroke patient improved from 3.98 to 4.45, a variance of 9.5%. Comfort in administering emergency medications improved from 3.02 to 3.98, a variance of 19.1%. Comfort in identifying neurologic changes improved from 3.82 to 4.43, a variance of 12.3%. Comfort in communicating neurologic changes to the provider improved from 4.00 to 4.66, a variance of 13.2%. There was an overall improvement in the variance in all 5 categories of 13.1%. Conclusion: The use of high-fidelity simulation allowed nurses to gain comfort in assessment, management, and provider communication specific to neuroscience patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-738
Author(s):  
Cindy Chamberland ◽  
Helen M. Hodgetts ◽  
Chelsea Kramer ◽  
Esther Breton ◽  
Gilles Chiniara ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thomas E. Doyle ◽  
David Musson ◽  
Jon-Michael J Booth

The skill of visualization is fundamental to the teaching and learning of engineering design and graphics. Implicit in any skill is the ability to improve with training and practice. This study examines visualization performance using three teaching modalities of a Freshmen Design and Graphics course: 1) Traditional, 2) Project based Dissection, and 3) Simulation based Design. The first and second modalities focused assessment on the part/assembly form, whereas the third modality transitioned the outcome expectations to understanding and function of mechanism design. A shift of focus from Traditional (Form) to Simulation (Function) was expected to positively effect visualization performance. Analogously, medical education and practice also require visualization and high-fidelity simulation has provided numerous positive outcomes for the practice of medicine. Comparison of a random population of 375 from each year indicated a decline in the average visualization scores. Further analysis revealed that highest 100 and 250 exam score populations show improvement in average scores with consistent variance. This paper will examine simulation based learning in medicine and engineering, present our findings on the comparison between teaching modalities, and discuss the reasons for the unexpected bifurcation of results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document