scholarly journals “Was that a success or not a success?”: a qualitative study of health professionals’ perspectives on support for people with long-term conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Owens ◽  
Vikki A. Entwistle ◽  
Alan Cribb ◽  
Zoë C. Skea ◽  
Simon Christmas ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
pp. 174239531983646
Author(s):  
Jessica Young ◽  
Ursula Poole ◽  
Fardowsa Mohamed ◽  
Shona Jian ◽  
Martyn Williamson ◽  
...  

Objectives There is renewed attention to the role of social networks as part of person-centred long-term conditions care. We sought to explore the benefits of ‘care maps’ – a patient-identified social network map of their care community – for health professionals in providing person-centred care. Methods We piloted care maps with 39 patients with long-term conditions in three urban and one rural general practice and two hospital wards. We interviewed the health professionals (n = 39) of these patients about what value, if any, care maps added to patient care. We analysed health professional interview data using thematic analysis to identify common themes. Results Health professionals all said they learned about their patients as a person-in-context. There was an increased understanding of patients’ support networks, synthesising what is known and unknown. Health professionals understood patients’ perceptions of health professionals and what really mattered to patients. There was discussion about the therapeutic value of care maps. The maps prompted reflection on practice. Discussion Care maps facilitated a broader focus than the clinical presentation. Using care maps may enable health professionals to support self-management rather than feeling responsible for many aspects of care. Care maps had ‘social function’ for health professionals. They may be a valuable tool for patients and clinicians to bridge the gap between medical treatment and patients’ lifeworlds.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Wook Kim ◽  
Jason Madan ◽  
Melina Dritsaki ◽  
Carol Bryce ◽  
Vera Forjaz ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Since the introduction of digital health technologies in National Health Service (NHS), health professionals are starting to use email, text, and other digital methods to consult with their patients in a timely manner. There is lack of evidence regarding the economic impact of digital consulting in the United Kingdom (UK) NHS. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to estimate the direct costs associated with digital consulting as an adjunct to routine care at 18 clinics serving young people aged 16-24 years with long-term conditions. METHODS This study uses both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 173 clinical team members on the impacts of digital consulting. A structured questionnaire was developed and used for 115 health professionals across 12 health conditions at 18 sites in the United Kingdom to collect data on time and other resources used for digital consulting. A follow-up semistructured interview was conducted with a single senior clinician at each site to clarify the mechanisms through which digital consulting use might lead to outcomes relevant to economic evaluation. We used the two-part model to see the association between the time spent on digital consulting and the job role of staff, type of clinic, and the average length of the working hours using digital consulting. RESULTS When estimated using the two-part model, consultants spent less time on digital consulting compared with nurses (95.48 minutes; P<.001), physiotherapists (55.3 minutes; P<.001), and psychologists (31.67 minutes; P<.001). Part-time staff spent less time using digital consulting than full-time staff despite insignificant result (P=.15). Time spent on digital consulting differed across sites, and no clear pattern in using digital consulting was found. Health professionals qualitatively identified the following 4 potential economic impacts for the NHS: decreasing adverse events, improving patient well-being, decreasing wait lists, and staff workload. We did not find evidence to suggest that the clinical condition was associated with digital consulting use. CONCLUSIONS Nurses and physiotherapists were the greatest users of digital consulting. Teams appear to use an efficient triage system with the most expensive members digitally consulting less than lower-paid team members. Staff report showed concerns regarding time spent digitally consulting, which implies that direct costs increase. There remain considerable gaps in evidence related to cost-effectiveness of digital consulting, but this study has highlighted important cost-related outcomes for assessment in future cost-effectiveness trials of digital consulting.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Amy Buckley ◽  
Karl Brownlie ◽  
Karl Hill ◽  
Ruby-Rose Hallamore ◽  
Nikita Vijan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205520762094235
Author(s):  
Jackie Sturt ◽  
Caroline Huxley ◽  
Btihaj Ajana ◽  
Caitjan Gainty ◽  
Chris Gibbons ◽  
...  

Background While studies have examined the impact of digital communication technology on healthcare, there is little exploration of how new models of digital care change the roles and identities of the health professional and patient. The purpose of the current study is to generate multidisciplinary reflections and questions around the use of digital consulting and the way it changes the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional. Method We used a large pre-existing qualitative dataset from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication (LYNC) study which involved interviews with healthcare professionals and a group of 16–24 years patients with long-term physical and mental health conditions. We conducted a three-stage mixed methods analysis. First, using a small sample of interview data from the LYNC study, we identified three key themes to explore in the data and relevant academic literature. Second, in small groups we conducted secondary analysis of samples of patient and health professional LYNC interview data. Third, we ran a series of rapid evidence reviews. Findings We identified three key themes: workload/flow, impact of increased access to healthcare and vulnerabilities. Both health professionals and patients were 'on duty' in their role more often. Increased access to healthcare introduced more responsibilities to both patients and health professionals. Traditional concepts in medical ethics, confidentiality, empathy, empowerment/power, efficiency and mutual responsibilities are reframed in the context of digital consulting. Conclusions Our collaboration identified conflicts and constraints in the construction of digital patients and digital clinicians. There is evidence that digital technologies change the nature of a medical consultation and with it the identities and the roles of clinicians and patients which, in turn, calls for a redefinition of traditional concepts of medical ethics. Overall, digital consulting has the potential to significantly reduce costs while maintaining or improving patient care and clinical outcomes. Timely study of digital engagement in the National Health Service is a matter of critical importance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1995-2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Hunter ◽  
Carolyn A. Chew‐Graham ◽  
Susanne Langer ◽  
Jessica Drinkwater ◽  
Alexandra Stenhoff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document