scholarly journals Type 2 diabetes and COPD: treatment in the right healthcare setting? An observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Willink ◽  
Rimke C. Vos ◽  
I. Looijmans-van den Akker ◽  
Huberta E. Hart

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and COPD are chronic medical conditions, for which patients need lifelong healthcare. The aim of this study is to examine in which healthcare setting patients with T2DM and COPD receive their care, and if this is the correct healthcare setting according to guidelines. Method T2DM and COPD patients from five primary care practices were included. Data concerning healthcare setting and patient- and clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical records. Patient profiles treated in primary care were compared with the profiles of those treated in secondary care. In patients treated in secondary care we evaluated whether treatment allocation was according to the guidelines and if back-referral to primary care should take place. Results Of the T2DM and COPD patients 7.6% and 29.6% respectively, were treated in secondary care, and 72.7% respectively 31.4% of these were according to the guideline. T2DM patients treated in primary care were older (63 versus 57 years, p < 0.01, had a shorter diabetes duration (8 versus 11 years, p < 0.01) and lower HbA1c (53.0 versus 63.5 mmol/l, p < 0.01) than those treated in secondary care. Those with COPD treated in primary care used less inhalation medication (75.2 versus 90.1%, p < 0.01) and had better spirometry results (67.39 versus 57.53 FEV1%pred, p < 0.01). Conclusion The majority of the patients with T2DM and COPD were correctly treated in primary care and on average patients with a better health condition were treated in primary care.. Also, those who were treated in secondary care were most of the time treated in the correct treatment setting according to the guidelines.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rimke P Willink ◽  
Rimke C Vos ◽  
Ingrid Looijmans-van den Akker ◽  
Huberta E Hart

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and COPD are chronic conditions, for which patients need lifelong healthcare. The aim of the study is to examine in which healthcare setting patients with T2DM and COPD receive care, and if they are allocated to the correct setting.Method T2DM and COPD patients from five primary care centres were included. Data concerning treatment setting, patient- and clinical characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. The profile of patients treated in primary care was compared with that of those treated in secondary care. For patients treated in secondary care we evaluated whether treatment allocation was according to guidelines and if back-referral to primary care could take place.Results Of the T2DM and COPD patients 7.6% and 29.6% were treated in secondary care of which 72.7% and 31.4% according to the guideline. T2DM patients treated in primary care were older (63 versus 57 years, p = 0.001), had a shorter diabetes duration (8 versus 11 years, p < 0.001) and lower HbA1c (53.0 versus 63.5 mmmol/l, p < 0.001) than those treated in secondary care. Those with COPD treated in primary care used less inhalation medication (75.2 versus 90.1%, p < 0.001) and had better spirometry results (67.39 versus 57.53 FEV1%pred, p < 0.001).Conclusion The majority of the patients with T2DM and COPD were treated in primary care correctly. Patients treated in primary care on average had a better health condition compared to those in secondary care. The majority of the T2DM patients and the minority of COPD patients were treated correctly in secondary care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (669) ◽  
pp. e260-e267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian McMillan ◽  
Katherine Easton ◽  
Elizabeth Goyder ◽  
Brigitte Delaney ◽  
Priya Madhuvrata ◽  
...  

BackgroundDespite the seven-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among females previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GD), annual rates of follow-up in primary care are low. There is a need to consider how to reduce the incidence of progression to T2DM among this high-risk group.AimTo examine the views of females diagnosed with GD to ascertain how to improve primary care support postnatally, and the potential role of technology in reducing the risk of progression to T2DM.Design and settingA qualitative study of a purposive sample of 27 postnatal females leaving secondary care with a recent diagnosis of GD.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 females, who had been previously diagnosed with GD, at around 6–12 weeks postnatally. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analysed thematically.ResultsFacilitators and barriers to engaging in a healthy postnatal lifestyle were identified, the most dominant being competing demands on time. Although females were generally satisfied with the secondary care they received antenatally, they felt abandoned postnatally and were uncertain what to expect from their GP in terms of follow-up and support. Females felt postnatal care could be improved by greater clarity regarding this, and enhanced by peer support, multidisciplinary input, and subsidised facilities. Technology was seen as a potential adjunct by providing information, enabling flexible and personalised self-management, and facilitating social support.ConclusionA more tailored approach for females previously diagnosed with GD may help reduce the risk of progression to T2DM. A need for future research to test the efficacy of using technology as an adjunct to current care was identified.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rie Ueki ◽  
Masao Ichikawa ◽  
Yuri Hiranuma ◽  
Takashi Naito ◽  
Takami Maeno ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 712-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Bray ◽  
Melissa Roupe ◽  
Sandra Young ◽  
Jolynn Harrell ◽  
Doyle M. Cummings ◽  
...  

Purpose Redesigning the system of care for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been well studied in rural communities with a significant minority population and limited health care resources. This study assesses the feasibility and potential for cost-effectiveness of restructuring care in rural fee-for-service practices for predominantly minority patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods This was a feasibility study of implementing case management, group visits, and electronic registry in 5 solo or small group primary care practices in rural North Carolina. The subjects were 314 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age = 61 years; 72% African American; 54% female). An advanced practice nurse visited each practice weekly for 12 months, provided intensive diabetes case management, and facilitated a 4-session group visit educational program. An electronic diabetes registry and visit reminder systems were implemented. Results There was an improvement in the percentage of patients achieving diabetes management goals and an improvement in productivity and billable encounters. The percentage of patients with a documented self-management goal increased from 0% to 42%, a currently documented lipid panel from 55% to 76%, currently documented aspirin use from 25% to 37%, and currently documented foot examination from 12% to 54%. The average daily encounter rate improved from 20.17 to 31.55 on intervention days. Conclusions A redesigned care delivery system that uses case management with structured group visits and an electronic registry can be successfully incorporated into rural primary care practices and appears to significantly improve both care processes and practice productivity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document