Is preoperative anxiety associated with postoperative delirium in older persons undergoing cardiac surgery? Secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Although many studies have reported numerous risk factors for postoperative delirium, data are scarce about preoperative anxiety as a risk factor. The study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative anxiety and postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods Secondary data analysis of a randomized, observer-blind, controlled trial. A total of 190 patients 65 years or older and admitted to the intensive care unit and cardiac surgery unit of a university hospital scheduled for elective on-pump cardiac surgery were included. State anxiety was measured preoperatively using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale for anxiety. Incidence of delirium was measured during the first 5 postoperative days using the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (when ventilated), or the 3 Minute Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method (when extubated) and by daily chart review. Results Preoperative state anxiety was reported by 31% of the patients and 41% had postoperative delirium. A multiple step logistic regression analyses revealed no association between preoperative anxiety and postoperative delirium. Significant risk factors for postoperative delirium were age (OR = 1.10, 95% CI (1.03–1.18)), activities of daily living (0.69, 95% CI (0.50–0.96)), diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.15, 95% CI (1.42–7.00)) and time on cardiopulmonary bypass (OR = 1.01, 95% CI (1.00 to 1.02)). Conclusions No relationship could be found between preoperative anxiety and postoperative delirium.

Download Full-text

Postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery of elderly patients as an independent risk factor for prolonged length of stay in intensive care unit and in hospital

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research ◽

10.1007/s40520-021-01842-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Andrea Kirfel ◽

Jan Menzenbach ◽

Vera Guttenthaler ◽

Johanna Feggeler ◽

Andreas Mayr ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Postoperative Delirium ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Confusion Assessment

Abstract Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is a relevant and underdiagnosed complication after cardiac surgery that is associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this subgroup study was to compare the frequency of tested POD versus the coded International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) diagnosis of POD and to evaluate the influence of POD on LOS in ICU and hospital. Methods 254 elective cardiac surgery patients (mean age, 70.5 ± 6.4 years) at the University Hospital Bonn between September 2018 and October 2019 were evaluated. The endpoint tested POD was considered positive, if one of the tests Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) or Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), 4 'A's Test (4AT) or Delirium Observation Scale (DOS) was positive on one day. Results POD occurred in 127 patients (50.0%). LOS in ICU and hospital were significantly different based on presence (ICU 165.0 ± 362.7 h; Hospital 26.5 ± 26.1 days) or absence (ICU 64.5 ± 79.4 h; Hospital 14.6 ± 6.7 days) of POD (p < 0.001). The multiple linear regression showed POD as an independent predictor for a prolonged LOS in ICU (48%; 95%CI 31–67%) and in hospital (64%; 95%CI 27–110%) (p < 0.001). The frequency of POD in the study participants that was coded with the ICD F05.0 and F05.8 by hospital staff was considerably lower than tests revealed by the study personnel. Conclusion Approximately 50% of elderly patients who underwent cardiac surgery developed POD, which is associated with an increased ICU and hospital LOS. Furthermore, POD is highly underdiagnosed in clinical routine.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Delirium after Urological Surgery: A Literature Review

Current Urology ◽

10.1159/000499280 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 133-140 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ioannis Leotsakos ◽

Ioannis Katafigiotis ◽

Ofer N. Gofrit ◽

Mordechai Duvdevani ◽

Dionysios Mitropoulos

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Literature Search ◽

Postoperative Delirium ◽

Mini Mental State Examination ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Confusion Assessment ◽

Urological Surgery ◽

State Examination

Purpose: We aimed to thoroughly search and identify studies referring to risk factors associated with postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing open as well as en-doscopic urological surgery. Methods: The review after a systematic literature search included 5 studies. Results: The incidence of POD was reported to be between 7.8 and 30% depending on the type of the urologic surgery, while in the majority of the studies the onset happened on the first postoperative day and the symptoms lasted 3 ± 0.8 days. Seventeen different risk factors for POD were identified and presented in detail. Conclusion: The Mini-Mental State Examination score and older age were significantly associated with the development of POD. However, the Confusion Assessment Method is very well validated against the diagnosis of delirium from the specialists.

Download Full-text

Elevated Procalcitonin and Depression As Risk Factors For Postoperative Delirium In The Elderly After Cardiac Surgery – A Prospective Observational Study.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-94378/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Anna Kupiec ◽

Barbara Adamik ◽

Natalia Kozera ◽

Waldemar Gozdzik

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Postoperative Delirium ◽

Inflammatory Marker ◽

Functional Decline ◽

The Elderly ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Multivariable Logistic Regression Model

Abstract Background One of the most common complications after cardiac surgery is delirium. Determining the origin of this complication from possible pathomechanisms is difficult. The activation of an inflammatory response during surgery has been suggested as one possible mechanism of delirium. The usefulness of the inflammatory marker procalcitonin (PCT) as a predictor of delirium after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) has not yet been investigated. Methods The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the risk of developing postoperative delirium in a group of elderly patients using a multivariate assessment of preoperative (PCT, comorbidities, functional decline, depression) and intraoperative risk factors. 149 elderly patients were included. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Results Thirty patients (20%) developed post-operative delirium: hypoactive in 50%, hyperactive in 33%, mixed in 17%. Preoperative PCT above the reference range (> 0.05 ng/mL) was recorded more often in patients who postoperatively developed delirium than in the non-delirium group (50% vs. 27%, p=0.019). After surgery, PCT was significantly higher in the delirium than the non-delirium group: ICU admission after surgery: 0.08 ng/mL, IQR 0.03-0.15 vs. 0.05 ng/mL, IQR 0.02-0.09, p=0.011), and for consecutive days (day 1: 0.59 ng/mL, IQR 0.25-1.55 vs. 0.25 ng/mL, IQR 0.14-0.54, p=0.003; day 2: 1.21 ng/mL, IQR 0.24-3.29 vs. 0.36 ng/mL, IQR 0.16-0.76, p=0.006; day 3: 0.76 ng/mL, IQR 0.48-2.34 vs. 0.34 ng/mL, IQR 0.14-0.66, p=0.001). Patients with delirium were older (74 years, IQR 70 – 76 vs. 69 years, IQR 67 – 74; p=0.038) and more often had functional decline (47% vs. 28%, p=0.041). There was no difference in comorbidities with the exception of anaemia (43% vs. 19%, p=0.006). Depression was detected in 40% of patients with delirium and in 17% without delirium (p=0.005). In a multivariable logistic regression model of preoperative procalcitonin (OR= 3.05; IQR 1.02-9.19), depression (OR=5.02, IQR 1.67-15.10), age (OR=1.14; IQR 1.02-1.26), functional decline (OR=0.76; IQR 0.63-0.91) along with CPB time (OR=1.04; IQR 1.02-1.06) were significant predictors of postoperative delirium. Conclusion A preoperative PCT test and assessment of functional decline and depression may help identify patients at risk for developing delirium after cardiac surgery.

Download Full-text

Protocol for the electroencephalography guidance of anesthesia to alleviate geriatric syndromes (ENGAGES-Canada) study: A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.19213.1 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 1165 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Alain Deschamps ◽

Tarit Saha ◽

Renée El-Gabalawy ◽

Eric Jacobsohn ◽

Charles Overbeek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Postoperative Delirium ◽

Anesthetic Management ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Minimum Concentration ◽

Confusion Assessment

Background: There is some evidence that electroencephalography guidance of general anesthesia can decrease postoperative delirium after non-cardiac surgery. There is limited evidence in this regard for cardiac surgery. A suppressed electroencephalogram pattern, occurring with deep anesthesia, is associated with increased incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) and death. However, it is not yet clear whether this electroencephalographic pattern reflects an underlying vulnerability associated with increased incidence of delirium and mortality, or whether it is a modifiable risk factor for these adverse outcomes. Methods: The Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENGAGES-Canada) is an ongoing pragmatic 1200 patient trial at four Canadian sites. The study compares the effect of two anesthetic management approaches on the incidence of POD after cardiac surgery. One approach is based on current standard anesthetic practice and the other on electroencephalography guidance to reduce POD. In the guided arm, clinicians are encouraged to decrease anesthetic administration, primarily if there is electroencephalogram suppression and secondarily if the EEG index is lower than the manufacturers recommended value (bispectral index (BIS) or WAVcns below 40 or Patient State Index below 25). The aim in the guided group is to administer the minimum concentration of anesthetic considered safe for individual patients. The primary outcome of the study is the incidence of POD, detected using the confusion assessment method or the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit; coupled with structured delirium chart review. Secondary outcomes include unexpected intraoperative movement, awareness, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, delirium severity and duration, quality of life, falls, and predictors and outcomes of perioperative distress and dissociation. Discussion: The ENGAGES-Canada trial will help to clarify whether or not using the electroencephalogram to guide anesthetic administration during cardiac surgery decreases the incidence, severity, and duration of POD. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02692300) 26/02/2016

Download Full-text

Intraoperative Tight Glucose Control Using Hyperinsulinemic Normoglycemia Increases Delirium after Cardiac Surgery

Anesthesiology ◽

10.1097/aln.0000000000000669 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 122 (6) ◽

pp. 1214-1223 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Leif Saager ◽

Andra E. Duncan ◽

Jean-Pierre Yared ◽

Brian D. Hesler ◽

Jing You ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Blood Glucose ◽

Glucose Control ◽

Postoperative Delirium ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Tight Glucose Control ◽

Double Blind ◽

Mortality And Morbidity ◽

Confusion Assessment

Abstract Background: Postoperative delirium is common in patients recovering from cardiac surgery. Tight glucose control has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity. Therefore, the authors sought to determine the effect of tight intraoperative glucose control using a hyperinsulinemic–normoglycemic clamp approach on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: The authors enrolled 198 adult patients having cardiac surgery in this randomized, double-blind, single-center trial. Patients were randomly assigned to either tight intraoperative glucose control with a hyperinsulinemic–normoglycemic clamp (target blood glucose, 80 to 110 mg/dl) or standard therapy (conventional insulin administration with blood glucose target, <150 mg/dl). Delirium was assessed using a comprehensive delirium battery. The authors considered patients to have experienced postoperative delirium when Confusion Assessment Method testing was positive at any assessment. A positive Confusion Assessment Method was defined by the presence of features 1 (acute onset and fluctuating course) and 2 (inattention) and either 3 (disorganized thinking) or 4 (altered consciousness). Results: Patients randomized to tight glucose control were more likely to be diagnosed as being delirious than those assigned to routine glucose control (26 of 93 vs. 15 of 105; relative risk, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.37; P = 0.03), after adjusting for preoperative usage of calcium channel blocker and American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status. Delirium severity, among patients with delirium, was comparable with each glucose management strategy. Conclusion: Intraoperative hyperinsulinemic–normoglycemia augments the risk of delirium after cardiac surgery, but not its severity.

Download Full-text

Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method in Detecting Postoperative Delirium in Cardiac Surgery Patients

American Journal of Critical Care ◽

10.4037/ajcc2015551 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 24 (6) ◽

pp. 480-487 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

N. Smulter ◽

H. C. Lingehall ◽

Y. Gustafson ◽

B. Olofsson ◽

K. G. Engstrom

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Postoperative Delirium ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Confusion Assessment

Download Full-text

Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol Sedation Reduces Delirium after Cardiac Surgery

Anesthesiology ◽

10.1097/aln.0000000000000951 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 124 (2) ◽

pp. 362-368 ◽

Cited By ~ 149

Author(s):

George Djaiani ◽

Natalie Silverton ◽

Ludwik Fedorko ◽

Jo Carroll ◽

Rima Styra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Absolute Risk ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Absolute Risk Reduction ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Number Needed To Treat ◽

Confusion Assessment ◽

Institutional Ethics ◽

Randomization Code

Abstract Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is a serious complication after cardiac surgery. Use of dexmedetomidine to prevent delirium is controversial. The authors hypothesized that dexmedetomidine sedation after cardiac surgery would reduce the incidence of POD. Methods After institutional ethics review board approval, and informed consent, a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients 60 yr or older undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients with a history of serious mental illness, delirium, and severe dementia were excluded. Upon admission to intensive care unit (ICU), patients received either dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg bolus followed by 0.2 to 0.7 μg kg−1 h−1 infusion) or propofol (25 to 50 μg kg−1 min−1 infusion) according to a computer-generated randomization code in blocks of four. Assessment of delirium was performed with confusion assessment method for ICU or confusion assessment method after discharge from ICU at 12-h intervals during the 5 postoperative days. Primary outcome was the incidence of POD. Results POD was present in 16 of 91 (17.5%) and 29 of 92 (31.5%) patients in dexmedetomidine and propofol groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.92; P = 0.028). Median onset of POD was on postoperative day 2 (1 to 4 days) versus 1 (1 to 4 days), P = 0.027, and duration of POD 2 days (1 to 4 days) versus 3 days (1 to 5 days), P = 0.04, in dexmedetomidine and propofol groups, respectively. Conclusions When compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine sedation reduced incidence, delayed onset, and shortened duration of POD in elderly patients after cardiac surgery. The absolute risk reduction for POD was 14%, with a number needed to treat of 7.1.

Download Full-text

A Systematic Review and Pooled Prevalence of Paediatric Delirium in Critically Ill Children

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1093/ijpp/riab015.038 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 29 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. i31-i32

Author(s):

D Semple ◽

M M Howlett ◽

J D Strawbridge ◽

C V Breatnach ◽

J C Hayden

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Critical Care ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Tools ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Confusion Assessment ◽

Pooled Prevalence

Abstract Introduction Paediatric Delirium (PD) is a neuropsychiatric complication that occurs during the management of children in the critical care environment (Paediatric Intensive Care (PICU) and Neonatal Intensive Care (NICU). Delirium can be classified as hypoactive (decreased responsiveness and withdrawal), hyperactive (agitation and restlessness), and mixed (combined) (1). PD can be assessed using a number of assessment tools. PD has been historically underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed, having many overlapping symptoms with other syndrome such as pain and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (2). An appreciation of the extent of PD would help clinicians and policy makers drive interventions to improve recognition, prevention and management of PD in clinical practice. Aim To estimate the pooled prevalence of PD using validated assessment tools, and to identify risk factors including patient-related, critical-care related and pharmacological factors. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases was undertaken. Eligible articles included observational studies or trials that estimated a prevalence of PD in a NICU/PICU population using a validated PD assessment tool. Validated tools are the paediatric Confusion Assessment Method-ICU (pCAM-ICU), the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD), the PreSchool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (psCAM-ICU), pCAM-ICU severity scale (sspCAM-ICU), and the Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms scale Paediatric Delirium scale (SOS-PD) (1). Only full text studies were included. No language restrictions were applied. Two reviewers independently screened records. Data was extracted using a pre-piloted form and independently verified by another reviewer. Quality was assessed using tools from the National Institutes of Health. A pooled prevalence was calculated from the studies that estimated PD prevalence using the most commonly applied tool, the CAPD (1). Results Data from 23 observational studies describing prevalence and risk factors for PD in critically ill children were included (Figure 1). Variability in study design and outcome reporting was found. Study quality was generally good. Using the validated tools prevalence ranged from 10–66% of patients. Hypoactive delirium was the most prevalent sub-class identified. Using the 13 studies that used the CAPD tool, a pooled prevalence of 35% (27%-43% 95%CI) was calculated. Younger ages, particularly less than two years old, sicker patients, particularly those undergoing mechanical and respiratory ventilatory support were more at risk for PD. Restraints, the number of sedative medications, including the cumulative use of benzodiazepines and opioids were identified as risk factors for the development of PD. PD was associated with longer durations of mechanical ventilation, longer stays and increased costs. Data on association with increased mortality risk is limited and conflicting. Conclusion PD affects one third of critical care admissions and is resource intense. Routine assessment in clinical practice may facilitate earlier detection and management strategies. Modifiable risk factors such as the class and number of sedative and analgesic medications used may contribute to the development of PD. Early mobility and lessening use of these medications present strategies to prevent PD occurrence. Longitudinal prospective multi-institutional studies to further investigate the presentations of the different delirium subtypes and modifiable risk factors that potentially contribute to the development of PD, are required. References 1. Semple D (2020) A systematic review and pooled prevalence of PD, including identification of the risk factors for the development of delirium in critically ill children. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5KFZ8 2. Ista E, te Beest H, van Rosmalen J, de Hoog M, Tibboel D, van Beusekom B, et al. Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms-Paediatric Delirium scale: A tool for early screening of delirium in the PICU. Australian Critical Care. 2018;31(5):266–73

Download Full-text

Do we know if our Patients are Delirious?

Journal of the Intensive Care Society ◽

10.1177/175114370800900322 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 269-269

Author(s):

Callum Kaye

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Critically Ill Patient ◽

Confusion Assessment ◽

Surgical Icu ◽

Symptoms And Signs

Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is a significant cause of morbidity, mortality and increases ICU, as well as hospital length of stay1,2. Furthermore, with so many of the risk factors being present in the critically ill patient in the ICU environment, it's not surprising that other studies have found that up to 80% of patients will be delirious at some point during admission3,4. We performed a small study in a Toronto Medical-Surgical ICU using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)5 to determine the prevalence of delirium in this unit. We concurrently reviewed medical and nursing notes to identify documentation of symptoms and signs that could indicate possible delirium during routine clinical assessment of the patient.

Download Full-text

Serum protein S100 as marker of postoperative delirium after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: secondary analysis of two prospective randomized controlled trials

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) ◽

10.1515/cclm-2015-1012 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 54 (10) ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Layth Al Tmimi ◽

Marc Van de Velde ◽

Bart Meyns ◽

Bart Meuris ◽

Paul Sergeant ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Postoperative Delirium ◽

Artery Bypass ◽

Confusion Assessment Method ◽

Assessment Method ◽

Off Pump ◽

Confusion Assessment ◽

Opcab Surgery ◽

Pump Coronary Artery Bypass

AbstractBackground:To investigate the predictive value of S100 (biochemical marker of neuroglial injury) for the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)-surgery.Methods:We enrolled 92 patients older than 18 years undergoing elective OPCAB-surgery. Serum-levels of S100 were determined at baseline (BL), end of surgery (EOS) and on the first postoperative day (PD1). Postoperatively, all-patients were evaluated daily until PD5 for the presence of POD using the confusion assessment method (CAM) or the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).Results:The overall incidence of POD was 21%. S100-values on PD1 significantly predicted the occurrence of POD during the later hospital stay [area under the curve (AUC)=0.724 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.619–0.814); p=0.0001] with an optimal cut-off level of 123 pg mLConclusions:S100-levels <123 pg mL

Download Full-text